Profound LH suppression after GnRH antagonist administration is associated with a significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rate in IVF

Factors associated with the efficacy of mature oocyte production after dual-trigger controlled ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol

BACKGROUND

The number of mature oocytes retrieved plays a significant role in determining embryo development and pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF). However, studies investigating factors predictive of the efficacy of mature oocyte production (EMOP) after dual-trigger controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) are rare. This study aims to identify key predictors of EMOP during dual-trigger COS with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol for IVF.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 359 first-time IVF patients undergoing dual-trigger COS with a GnRH antagonist protocol. EMOP was defined as the ratio of metaphase II (MII) oocyte count to antral follicle count (AFC). Based on EMOP results, patients were divided into two groups: group A (EMOP <70%; n = 232) and group B (EMOP ≥70%; n = 127).

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that day-2 follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), stimulation duration, and total oocyte count were the most significant predictors of EMOP ( p < 0.05; odds ratios: 1.637, 3.400, and 1.530, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that total oocyte count <9.5 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.782; sensitivity, 76.2%; specificity, 69.2%; p < 0.001) and stimulation duration <9.5 days (AUC, 0.725; sensitivity, 63.5%; specificity, 66.7%; p < 0.001) significantly predicted EMOP <70%. Stimulation duration combined with total oocyte count exhibited the highest power in predicting EMOP <70% (AUC, 0.767; sensitivity, 92.3%; specificity, 42.4%).

CONCLUSION

Stimulation duration combined with total oocyte count was identified as the most important factor associated with the EMOP during dual-trigger COS in IVF using a GnRH antagonist protocol.

LH level on ovulation trigger day has a different impact on the outcomes of agonist and antagonist regimens during in vitro fertilization

BACKGROUND

To assess the impact of the luteinizing hormone level on ovulation trigger day (LHOTD) on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and antagonist regimens during fresh embryo transfer cycles.

METHODS

A stepwise, progressive multivariate regression model was introduced to assess the effect of the LHOTD on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. Mantel‒Haenszel stratification analysis was used to examine the association between the LHOTD and clinical outcomes with the antagonist regimen.

RESULTS

The LHOTD had different distributions in the agonist and antagonist regimens. The cycles were assigned into three LHOTD tertile groups. In the agonist regimen, compared with the 1^st tertile (T1), in the 2^nd (T2) and 3^rd (T3) tertiles, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs], P value) were 1.187 (1.047-1.345, 0.007) and 1.420 (1.252-1.610, < 0.001) for clinical pregnancy, respectively, and 1.149 (1.009-1.309, 0.036) and 1.476 (1.296-1.681, < 0.001) for live birth. In the antagonist regimen, there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy and live birth rates among the tertiles. However, in the stratified group of patients aged less than 35 years, the ORs (95% CIs, P value) of T2 and T3 were 1.316 (1.051-1.648, 0.017) and 1.354 (1.077-1.703, 0.009) for clinical pregnancy, respectively, and 1.275 (1.008-1.611, 0.043) and1.269 (0.999-1.611, 0.051) for live birth. Moreover, there was a discrepancy in the results among the subdivided LHOTD T1 groups adopting the antagonist regimen. Compared with that of the < 1.06 mIU/mL subgroup, the ORs (95% CIs, P value) of the > 1.5 mIU/mL subgroup were 1.693 (1.194-2.400, 0.003) for clinical pregnancy and 1.532 (1.057-2.220, 0.024) for live birth after eliminating potential confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

The LHOTD was profoundly suppressed in the agonist regimen, and its level was positively correlated with clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. In contrast, in the flexible antagonist regimen, the LHOTD was significantly higher than that in the agonist regimen and did not correlate with the outcome, except for women in the nonadvanced age group and those with an excessively suppressed LHOTD. Further investigation is required to determine the rationale for these findings.

Supplementation with human menopausal gonadotropin in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles of women with high AMH: Pregnancy outcomes and serial hormone levels

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the value of using both HMG and recombinant FSH (r-FSH) in the GnRH antagonist protocol for women with high AMH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted from January 2013 to December 2018. Of 277 GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles in women with anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) ≥5 μg/L, 170 cycles receiving the combination of r-FSH and HMG (77 with HMG added at the beginning of the GnRH antagonist cycle and 93 with HMG added after GnRH antagonist administration) and 107 cycles receiving r-FSH alone were analyzed. The dynamic hormone profiles and embryonic and clinical outcomes of the patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

We observed significantly lower serum LH levels in the r-FSH + HMG groups during ovarian stimulation. The serum estradiol and progesterone levels were lower in the r-FSH + HMG groups on the trigger day. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences with respect to the number of oocytes retrieved, maturation, fertilization, blastocyst formation rate or ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The implantation and live birth rates were increased in the r-FSH + HMG groups compared with the r-FSH alone group, with no statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

HMG for LH supplementation in the GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with high AMH is not significantly superior to r-FSH alone in terms of ovarian response and pregnancy outcome. Nevertheless, HMG supplementation might be appropriate for women with an initially inadequate response to r-FSH or intracycle LH deficiency.

Predicting suboptimal oocyte yield following GnRH agonist trigger by measuring serum LH at the start of ovarian stimulation

STUDY QUESTION

Are the LH levels at the start of ovarian stimulation predictive of suboptimal oocyte yield from GnRH agonist triggering in GnRH antagonist down-regulated cycles?

SUMMARY ANSWER

LH levels at the start of ovarian stimulation are an independent predictor of suboptimal oocyte yield following a GnRH agonist trigger.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

A GnRH agonist ovulation trigger may result in an inadequate oocyte yield in a small subset of patients. This failure can range from empty follicle syndrome to the retrieval of much fewer oocytes than expected. Suboptimal response to a GnRH agonist trigger has been defined as the presence of circulating LH levels <15 IU/l 12 h after triggering. It has been shown that patients with immeasurable LH levels on trigger day have an up to 25% risk of suboptimal response.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

In this retrospective cohort study, all patients (n = 3334) who received GnRH agonist triggering (using Triptoreline 0.2 mg) for final oocyte maturation undergoing a GnRH antagonist cycle in our centre from 2011 to 2017 were included. The primary outcome of the study was oocyte yield, defined as the ratio between the total number of collected oocytes and the number of follicles with a mean diameter >10 mm prior to GnRH agonist trigger.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The endocrine profile of all patients was studied at initiation as well as at the end of ovarian stimulation. In order to evaluate whether LH levels, not only at the end but also at the start, of ovarian stimulation predicted oocyte yield, we performed multivariable regression analysis adjusting for the following confounding factors: female age, body mass index, oral contraceptives before treatment, basal and trigger day estradiol levels, starting FSH levels, use of highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin and total gonadotropin dose. Suboptimal response to GnRH agonist trigger was defined as <10th percentile of oocyte yield.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The average age was 31.9 years, and the mean oocyte yield was 89%. The suboptimal response to GnRH agonist trigger cut-off (<10th percentile) was 45%, which was exhibited by 340 patients. Following confounder adjustment, multivariable regression analysis showed that LH levels at the initiation of ovarian stimulation remained an independent predictor of suboptimal response even in the multivariable model (adjusted OR 0.920, 95% CI 0.871-0.971). Patients with immeasurable LH levels at the start of stimulation (<0.1 IU/l) had a 45.2% risk of suboptimal response, while the risk decreased with increasing basal LH levels; baseline circulating LH <0.5 IU/L, <2 IU/L and <5 IU/L were associated with a 39.1%, 25.2% and 13.6% risk, respectively.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The main limitation of the study is its retrospective design.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This is the largest study of GnRH agonist trigger cycles only, since most of the previous research on the predictive value of basal LH levels was performed in dual trigger cycles. LH values should be measured prior to start of ovarian stimulation. In cases where they are immeasurable, suboptimal response to GnRH agonist trigger can be anticipated, and an individualized approach is warranted.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

There was no funding and no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

The impact of adding hp-hMG in r-FSH started GnRH antagonist cycles on ART outcome

While luteinizing hormone (LH) activity is believed to play a role in follicle maturation, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) might play an important role in implantation process. We aimed to investigate whether addition of human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in recombinant-follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH) started GnRH antagonist controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) cycles might enhance implantation rate and improve in vitro fertilization (IVF) success. A total of 246 patients undergoing GnRH antagonist IVF cycles were analyzed. One hundred and twenty-three cycles (%50) were treated with only r-FSH and 123 cycles were treated with r-FSH plus hp-hMG combination. Total gonadotropin doses, total number of oocytes retrieved, metaphase 2 (MII) oocytes, top quality embryos, fertilization and implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rates were compared between the groups. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic details and baseline characteristics. Peak estradiol and progesterone levels in hCG trigger day, number of retrieved oocytes and top quality embryo counts, fertilization rates were similar between the groups. In r-FSH + hp-hMG group, significantly higher implantation rates (35.3% vs 24.3%, p=.017), CPRs (51.2% vs 35.8%, p=.015) and lower OHSS rates (1.6% vs 7.4%, p = .03) were observed respectively compared to r-FSH only treated patients. In conclusion, addition of hp-hMG on the day of antagonist initiation might increase CPRs. A better endometrial receptivity associated with higher implantation rates might be achieved due to hCG component in hp-hMG.

Ovarian response in oocyte donation cycles under LH suppression with GnRH antagonist or desogestrel progestin: retrospective and comparative study

Here are investigated the serum hormones in ovarian stimulation cycles of oocyte donors (OD), under endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) suppression with GnRH antagonist (antGnRH) vs. desogestrel (DSG) (progesterone-primed [PP]). OD underwent ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins at a private, university-based, infertility center between January 2017 and March 2018. Endogenous LH peak was controlled with either daily injections of antGnRH or with daily oral 75 mcg DSG (PP) until triggering. LH and progesterone were measured at trigger and the following day. A total of 404 OD cycles were included. There were no differences in age (26.7 ± 4.9 vs. 27.1 ± 4.8 years), AMH (3.7 ± 2.1 vs. 4.1 ± 2.7 ng/ml), and body mass index (BMI) (22.4 ± 2.8 vs. 22.1 ± 3.0 kg/m²) between PP and antGnRH groups, respectively. On the day of trigger, progesterone was lower in PP compared to antGnRH (0.9 ± 0.7, vs. 1.5 ± 1.2 ng/ml, p < .001), whereas no significant differences existed in estradiol or LH. On the day after trigger, lower progesterone in PP vs. antGnRH (10.8 ± 6.0 vs. 13.4 ± 7.9 ng/ml, p=.002) was observed. No differences were observed in the number of retrieved oocytes or the clinical pregnancies among recipients. Our study shows that endocrine response to DSG differs significantly as compared to antGnRH use for the control of endogenous LH without apparent impact on number of retrieved oocytes or the clinical pregnancies among recipients.

Overview of elagolix for the treatment of endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Suppression of sex-steroid secretion is required in a variety of gynecological conditions. This can be achieved using gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists that bind pituitary gonadotropin receptors and antagonize the link-receptor of endogenous GnRH, inhibiting the mechanism of GnRH pulsatility. On the other hand, GnRH antagonists immediately reduce gonadal steroid levels, avoiding the initial stimulatory phase of the agonists. Potential benefits of GnRH antagonists over GnRH agonists include a rapid onset and reversibility of action. Older GnRH antagonists are synthetic peptides, obtained by modifications of certain amino acids in the native GnRH sequence. They require subcutaneous injections, implantation of long-acting depots. The peptide structure is responsible for histamine-related adverse events and the tendency to elicit hypersensitivity reactions.

AREAS COVERED

Research has worked towards the development of non-peptidic molecules exerting antagonist action on GnRH. They are available for oral administration and may have a more beneficial safety profile in comparison with peptide GnRH antagonists. This article focuses on the data of the literature about elagolix, a novel non-peptidic GnRHantagonist, in the treatment of endometriosis.

EXPERT OPINION

Elagolix demonstrated efficacy in the management of endometriosis-associated pain and had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate its non-inferiority in comparison with other endometriosis's treatments.

Serum luteinizing hormone level on the third day after ovarian stimulation in GnRH agonist short protocol is predictive of outcome in poor responders but not in normal responders

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether prognostic value of LH measurement in normal responders (NR) is different from poor responders (POR).

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center study was conducted among patients who underwent ovarian stimulation with short protocol, with 300 NR and 101 POR, according to Bologna Consensus criteria. LH was measured on 3rd and 5th day after stimulation and HCG administration day.

RESULTS

There was significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle initiated among those with LH level on the third day after stimulation (a) below the 25 centile (b) between the 25 and 75 centile and (c) above the 75 centile in women with POR (7.7%, 15.1% vs. 36.4%, p = 0.02) but not in NR. There was significant correlation between LH ranks and clinical pregnancy rate in POR (p = 0.02) but not in NR. Factors associated with clinical pregnancy rate in POR were age and LH on the third of stimulation, while factors in NR were age, AFC and FSH.

CONCLUSION

LH level on the 3rd day of stimulation was predictive of clinical pregnancy in POR but not in NR.

What is the best treatment for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome and high LH/FSH ratio? A comparison among in vitro fertilization with GnRH agonist, GnRH antagonist and in vitro maturation

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether high LH/FSH ratio has a clinical impact on patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with GnRH-agonist/antagonist protocols or in vitro maturation (IVM) treatments.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all PCOS patients with day 3 LH/FSH ratio ≥1.5 who underwent IVF or IVM. The main outcomes measures were embryo quality and pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

A total of 75 cycles were included. Among these, 44 patients underwent long agonist protocol, 16 antagonist protocol and 15 IVM. Age, basal LH and FSH levels, as well as duration of infertility were comparable for all groups. The LH level on the day of hCG administration was significantly lower in the antagonist group (0.9 IU/ml) compared to the long agonist group (1.4 IU/ml, p = 0.01). There was no difference in pregnancy rates among the groups: 27.2 % in the long agonist group, 37.5 % in the antagonist group and 26.6 % among the IVM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

High LH/FSH ratio had no adverse effect on pregnancy rates in all three treatment modes.

Luteinizing hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin: a review of their varied clinical applications in assisted reproductive technology

Luteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) are often viewed as interchangeable from a functional standpoint because they are highly homologous members of the same glycoprotein hormone family that share a common α-subunit and receptor. However, technological advances yielding highly purified and recombinant gonadotropin preparations have revealed that LH and hCG fulfill different roles, both endogenously and when administered exogenously. These differences are becoming more apparent as the individual hormones are incorporated into the treatment of infertility - a therapeutic area that is continually advancing with the introduction of new agents and emerging clinical trial data. This review examines the unique attributes of LH and hCG that drive their distinctive applications in the treatment of female infertility.

Ovarian stimulation for IVF: mild approaches

In contrast to current approaches, the aim of mild stimulation is to develop safer and more patient-friendly protocols in which the risks of the treatment as a whole are minimized. Mild stimulation is defined as the method when exogenous gonadotropins are administered at lower doses, and/or for a shorter duration in GnRH antagonist co-treated cycles, or when oral compounds (antiestrogens, aromatase inhibitors) are used for ovarian stimulation for IVF, with the aim of limiting the number of oocytes obtained to fewer than eight. In this chapter we discuss the relevant physiology of follicle development, the development of milder stimulation protocols, the implications of mild stimulation, the current state of affairs, and future developments.

Is a GnRH antagonist protocol better in PCOS patients? A meta-analysis of RCTs

Objective

To review published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the outcomes of in vitro fertilization/intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) utilization of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists for ovarian stimulation in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients compared with classic luteal long agonist protocols.

Design

A meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials published in English between 2002 and 2013.

Patient(s) and Interventions

Nine RCTs examining PCOS patients undergoing IVF/ICSI including 588 women who underwent long agonist protocols and 554 women who underwent GnRH antagonist protocols.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate.

Result(s)

Nine RCTs were included in this analysis. The CPR-per-embryo transferred was similar in the two groups (relative risk (RR): 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85–1.10). Non-significant estimates comparing the two protocols were found for age, BMI, total dose of gonadotropin administered, number of days of stimulation and number of oocytes retrieved. After meta-analysis of 4 of the RCTs, it was concluded that a GnRH antagonist protocol is better than an agonist long protocol to reduce the rate of severe OHSS (odds ratio (OR): 1.56, 95% CI: 0.29–8.51).

Conclusion(s)

With respect to CPR, a GnRH antagonist protocol is similar to a GnRH agonist long protocol. However, for severe OHSS, a GnRH antagonist protocol is significantly better in PCOS patients.

Early initiation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist treatment results in a more stable endocrine milieu during the mid- and late-follicular phases: a randomized controlled trial comparing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist initiation on cycle day 2 or 6

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of initiating GnRH antagonist (GnRH-a) on cycle day (CD) 2 vs. CD 6 on LH, E₂, and P levels in the mid and late follicular phases.

DESIGN

Nested study within a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Reproductive medicine center in an university hospital.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred sixty patients undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

INTERVENTION(S)

Recombinant FSH (150-225 IU) was administered daily from CD 2 onward. The study group (CD 2) started GnRH-a cotreatment on CD 2, whereas the control group (CD 6) started on CD 6.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The follicular phase endocrine profile.

RESULT(S)

The LH levels on CD 6 were lower in the CD 2 group (0.6 ± 0.4 vs. 1.9 ± 1.4 IU/L). The CD 2 group demonstrated both lower E₂ levels on CD 6 (520.1 ± 429.6 pmol/L vs. 1,071.7 ± 654.2 pmol/L) and on the day of hCG administration (3,341.4 ± 1,535.3 pmol/L vs. 4,573.2 ± 2,445.4 pmol/L). The P levels did not differ on CD 6 or on the day of hCG administration.

CONCLUSION(S)

Early initiation of GnRH-a cotreatment results in a more stable endocrine profile, with more physiological levels of E2 and LH during the follicular phase. The effect on clinical outcomes must be established in larger trials.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00866034.

Clinical effects of a natural extract of urinary human menopausal gonadotrophin in normogonadotropic infertile patients

Purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) is a natural product extracted from the urine of postmenopausal women that contains pituitary follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and a small amount of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG). Here we retrospectively conducted a clinical pharmaceutical study on a cohort of normogonadotropic infertile patients addressed to long GnRH-agonist protocol with serum LH concentration ranging from 0.5 IU/L to 1.5 IU/L during the midfollicle phase, aiming at evaluating the effects of purified HMG supplementation during ovarian stimulation. There was no significant difference in either the basic clinical features of the patients or the pregnancy rate (71.4% versus 66.3%, P > 0.05) or other related indicators of pregnancy outcome. However, there was a higher level of serum oestradiol (E2) on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) (1999.10 ± 860.50 IU/L versus 2883.29 ± 1427.382 IU/L, P = 0.000) but lower fertilization rate (89.1% versus 69.6%, P < 0.000) in patients getting HMG supplementation and a higher risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). We suppose that exogenous LH supplementation is not needed when serum LH concentration of the midfollicle phase is around 0.5-1.5 IU/L during the long GnRH-agonist protocol. Adding exogenous HMG may decrease the fertilization rate and increase the risk of developing OHSS.

Does the degree of hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian recovery after oral contraceptive pills affect outcomes of IVF/ICSI cycles receiving GnRH-antagonist adjuvant therapy in women over 35 years of age?

PURPOSE

To evaluate if the degree of recovery of serum gonadotropins after oral contraceptive pills (OCP) pretreatment has an impact on ovarian response in GnRH-antagonist IVF cycles in women of advanced maternal age.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we included 98 women 35-42 years undergoing their first IVF cycle receiving gonadotropins and a fixed GnRH-antagonist adjuvant protocol. Data analysis was carried out according to changes in serum FSH, LH and estradiol (E(2)) levels (basal and post-OCP) divided in quartiles, and also according to absolute levels. The main outcomes were peak serum E(2), number of mature oocytes retrieved, length of stimulation, and amount of gonadotropins used.

RESULTS

By quartile analysis, patients with the highest levels of serum gonadotropins suppression and also patients with gonadotropin rebound needed larger amounts of LH during the treatment. On the other hand, women with absolute suppression of FSH/LH had increased length of stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study provide data that assist in clinical management. Gonadotropin serum levels after OCP treatment provide information for optimization of supplementation with LH in GnRH-antagonist cycles in women over age 35.

Recombinant human LH supplementation versus supplementation with urinary hCG-based LH activity during controlled ovarian stimulation in the long GnRH-agonist protocol: a matched case-control study

An observational, matched, case-control study was carried out to compare the efficacy of recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hLH) supplementation with that of urinary human menopausal gonadotrophin (u-hMG)-based LH activity during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for assisted reproductive technology (ART) using a long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist protocol. A total of 4719 women, 1573 per group, matched by age, body mass index, indication and number of previous ART cycles, were treated with either recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) and r-hLH in a fixed 2:1 ratio or u-hMG, either alone or in combination with r-hFSH, after down-regulation in a long GnRH-agonist protocol. Compared with the two u-hMG groups (u-hMG alone or in combination with r-hFSH, respectively), r-hFSH consumption was significantly lower (p < 0.001; p < 0.001), and pregnancy rates per cycle (p = 0.006; p = 0.022) and per embryo transfer (p = 0.025; p = 0.008), and implantation rate per embryo transferred (p < 0.001; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the group treated with the fixed combination of r-hFSH and r-hLH. In COS protocols with r-hFSH, supplementation with r-hLH appears to be more effective than supplementation with u-hMG using the long GnRH-agonist protocol for ART.

“Serum and follicular LH, pregnancy prediction and assisted reproduction”

The aim of this study was to determine the mean serum and follicular fluid LH and estradiol values in patients treated by IVF/ET (ICSI) after completed ovarian stimulation and to determine the range of values for these hormones with higher chances of conceiving pregnancies. All patients underwent stimulation in long agonistic protocol. Collected samples of body fluids (serum n = 31, follicular fluid n = 93) were centrifuged and supernatant was separated, aliquoted, frozen and stored at − 20°C. LH and E2 were measured in serum and follicular fluids. Cutoff value of E2 determined using follicular LH and follicular E2 correlation was 2100 nmol/L. If the E2 value was lower than 2100 nmol/L the ratio of results related to pregnancy was 29,4% (15/51). If the follicular E2 values were higher than 2100 nmol/L the ratio of results related to pregnancy was (7,1%, 3/42). The observed differences were significant (p 0.03). Follicular LH values higher than 3.1 IU/L and follicular E2 values < than 2100 nmol/L indicate higher conceiving probability. Our results can be fit in previous findings on negative effects of low LH values in IVF treatment procedures.

Effectiveness of a low gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist dose in preventing premature luteinizing hormone rise during controlled ovarian stimulation

The current prospective randomized study was designed to test the efficacy of a low dose (0.125 mg/day) of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist cetrorelix in preventing premature luteinizing hormone (LH) rise during controlled ovarian stimulation in comparison with the standard dose of 0.25 mg/day. Ovarian stimulation was started with 225 IU of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) on day 2 of the menstrual cycle. Cetrorelix was injected daily from day 6 of gonadotropin administration. Blood was sampled from each woman on day 3 of ovarian stimulation and then daily from day 5 onward up to human chorionic gonadotropin administration for analysis of FSH, LH, progesterone, and estradiol. LH rise was defined as serum LH ≥ 10 mIU/ml. There were 40 patients receiving cetrorelix at 0.25 mg/day and 36 patients receiving cetrorelix at 0.125 mg/day. Premature LH rise was recorded in 10% of patients injecting antagonist at 0.25 mg/day and in 14% of patients administered with antagonist at 0.125 mg/day. These frequencies did not differ statistically. In conclusion, our results suggest that a cetrorelix dose of 0.125 mg/day is effective as the standard dose (0.25 mg/day) in preventing premature LH rise during controlled ovarian stimulation.

[Use of GnRH antagonist for in vitro fertilization]

BACKGROUND

For many patients, the typical treatment protocol for in vitro fertilization (IVF) is both physically and psychologically demanding. An alternative approach to use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonists traditionally used to prevent premature ovulation, is use of GnRH-antagonists. The aim of this article is to describe advantages and disadvantages of using GnRH-antagonists in IVF.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The paper is based on literature identified through a non-systematic search in PubMed, and more than ten years of clinical experience with use of GnRH antagonists in IVF.

RESULTS

To maintain a similar pregnancy rate as that with GnRH-agonists, one can use GnRH-antagonists at an earlier time-point during stimulation of the ovaries and a lower dose of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). A less intensive stimulation implies a lower risk of complications and side effects and a shorter treatment period before egg collection (from four-five weeks to less than two weeks). The main disadvantage of the GnRH-antagonist protocol is that ovarian stimulation cannot be programmed to the same extent as that with use of a GnRH-agonist.

INTERPRETATION

Stimulation with a GnRH-antagonist instead of a GnRH-agonist in IVF, is less physically and psychologically demanding for the patients and maintains the same birth rate.

Who needs LH in ovarian stimulation?

LH plays a key role in the intermediate-late phases of folliculogenesis. Although ovarian stimulation is efficiently achieved in most cases by the administration of exogenous FSH alone, specific subgroups of women may benefit from LH activity supplementation during ovarian stimulation. Some authors have found improved outcome with LH activity supplementation in advanced reproductive age women. Experience suggests that in about 10-12% of young normogonadotrophic patients treated with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long protocol plus recombinant FSH human (r-hFSH), a 'steady response' is observed. In this subgroup of women, a higher number of oocytes is retrieved when daily LH activity supplementation is given from stimulation day 8, if compared with the standard FSH dose increase. Another subgroup of patients who may benefit from LH activity supplementation are those at risk for poor ovarian response treated with GnRH antagonist. Recent data demonstrate that in these women, when GnRH is administered in a flexible protocol, the concomitant addition of recombinant human LH improves the number of mature oocytes retrieved, when compared with the standard GnRH-a flare-up protocol. Thus, well calibrated LH administration improves the ovarian outcome in patients >35 years, in those showing an initial abnormal ovarian response to r-hFSH monotherapy, and in 'low prognosis' women treated with GnRH antagonists.

No association between endogenous LH and pregnancy in a GnRH antagonist protocol: part I, corifollitropin alfa

The relationship between endogenous LH concentrations and ongoing pregnancy rates among normogonadotrophic patients undergoing ovarian stimulation in a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol were examined. In the Engage trial, 1506 patients received corifollitropin alfa (150 μg) or daily recombinant FSH (rFSH) (200 IU) for the first 7 days of stimulation with 0.25mg ganirelix from stimulation day 5. Patients were retrospectively stratified by serum LH percentiles (< 25th, 25th-75th and >75th) on stimulation day 8 and day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration. Odds ratios (OR) with and without adjustment for predictive factors for ongoing pregnancy were estimated. LH concentration was not associated with pregnancy rates in either treatment arm, in contrast to ovarian response and serum progesterone. With adjustment for these predictors and age, OR (95% confidence interval) for ongoing pregnancy on stimulation day 8 for LH categories < P25 versus ≥ P25, >P75 versus ≤ P75 and < P25 versus >P75 were 0.75 (0.53-1.06), 1.26 (0.87-1.83) and 0.70 (0.46-1.09) in the corifollitropin alfa arm and 0.80 (0.54-1.17), 1.28 (0.87-1.87) and 0.73 (0.46-1.16) in the rFSH arm respectively. There was also no significant difference in pregnancy rates between LH categories on day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration with either treatment.

LH concentrations do not correlate with pregnancy in rFSH/GnRH antagonist cycles

The possible relationship between endogenous LH concentrations and clinical outcome was evaluated in 750 patients treated with a standardized gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and recombinant FSH (rFSH)-only protocol. Serum LH concentrations were measured during stimulation by a central laboratory and patients were stratified into quantiles of <P25, P25-P75, and >P75. The P25 values were 3.38 IU/l, 0.93 IU/l, and 0.91 IU/l on stimulation days 1, 5, and 8, respectively. The ongoing pregnancy rates per started cycle of patients within the <P25 subset on stimulation day 1, 5, or 8 were highly similar to those in the P25-P75, and >P75 subsets and ranged in the various subsets between 35.0% and 39.5%. In keeping with previous, smaller studies, these findings demonstrate that in good prognosis, non-obese patients endogenous LH in a GnRH antagonist protocol is able to support treatment with rFSH only.

A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol

BACKGROUND

Corifollitropin alfa, a fusion protein lacking LH activity, has a longer elimination half-life and extended time to peak levels than recombinant FSH (rFSH). A single injection of corifollitropin alfa may replace seven daily gonadotrophin injections during the first week of ovarian stimulation.

METHODS

In this large, double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority trial the ongoing pregnancy rates were assessed after one injection of 150 µg corifollitropin alfa during the first week of stimulation and compared with daily injections of 200 IU rFSH using a standard GnRH antagonist protocol.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 1506 treated patients with mean age of 31.5 years and body weight of 68.6 kg. Ongoing pregnancy rates of 38.9% for the corifollitropin alfa group and 38.1% for rFSH were achieved, with an estimated non-significant difference of 0.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): −3.9; 5.7] in favor of corifollitropin alfa. Stratified analyses of pregnancy rates confirmed robustness of this primary outcome by showing similar results regardless of IVF or ICSI, or number of embryos transferred. A slightly higher follicular response with corifollitropin alfa resulted in a higher number of cumulus–oocyte-complexes compared with rFSH [estimated difference 1.2 (95% CI: 0.5; 1.9)], whereas median duration of stimulation was equal (9 days) and incidence of (moderate/severe) ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was the same (4.1 and 2.7%, respectively P = 0.15).

CONCLUSION

Corifollitropin alfa is a novel and effective treatment option for potential normal responder patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist co-treatment for IVF resulting in a high ongoing pregnancy rate, equal to that achieved with daily rFSH. The trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NTC00696800.

Highly purified hMG achieves better pregnancy rates in IVF cycles but not ICSI cycles compared with recombinant FSH: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) was demonstrated to be superior to recombinant FSH (rFSH) regarding clinical outcomes. It is not clear whether this change in the evidence was due to the introduction of highly purified (HP) hMG.

DESIGN

Systematic review of properly randomised trials comparing HP-hMG vs. rFSH in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A meticulous search was performed using electronic databases and hand searches of the literature.

RESULTS

Six trials (2371 participants) were included. Pooling of the trials demonstrated that the probability of clinical pregnancy following HP-hMG administration was higher than rFSH and reached borderline significance (odd ratio (O.R) = 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.00 to 1.45), but the ongoing pregnancy/live-birth rate was not statistically different between the two drugs, although it showed strong trends towards improvement with HP-hMG (O.R = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.44). Subgroup analysis comparing both drugs in IVF cycles demonstrated a statistically significant better ongoing pregnancy/live-birth rate in favour of HP-hMG (O.R = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.68). On the other hand, there was almost an equal ongoing pregnancy/live-birth rate in ICSI cycles (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.7 to 1.36).

CONCLUSIONS

HP-hMG should be preferred over rFSH in women undergoing assisted reproduction, especially if IVF is the intended method of fertilisation.

IVF/ICSI outcomes between cycles with luteal estradiol (E2) pre-treatment before GnRH antagonist protocol and standard long GnRH agonist protocol: a prospective and randomized study

OBJECTIVE

To study if luteal E(2) pre-treatment before GnRH antagonist protocol improves IVF/ICSI outcomes compared with standard long GnRH agonist protocol.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized and controlled study.

SETTING

ART center of a state public hospital

PATIENT(S)

Two hundred twenty infertile women underwent IVF/ICSI treatments.

INTERVENTION(S)

Participants received oral Estradiol Valerate 4 mg/day preceding the IVF cycle from day 21 until day 2 of next cycle before GnRH antagonist protocol (E(2) pre-treatment group n=109) or received standard long GnRH agonist protocol as control group (n=111).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Number of oocytes collected, MII oocytes, fertilization, implantation, live birth and early pregnancy rate, and hormone profiles.

RESULT(S)

E(2) pre-treatment exerted a significant suppressive effect on FSH but not LH secretion compared with basal FSH and LH levels. In E(2) pre-treatment group serum LH level was significantly higher during COH and serum P was also significantly higher on the day of HCG injection compared with control group. Five patients from E(2) pre-treatment group had elevated LH at all time (>or= 10 IU/L) and also a concomitantly high P (>1 ng/mL). Two of the five women achieved pregnancy but had early pregnancy loss. Overall, IVF/ICSI outcomes such as implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were similar between E(2) pre-treatment and control groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

Luteal E(2) pre-treatment before GnRH antagonist protocol significantly increases serum LH level and incidence rate of premature LH but no significant effect is observed on implantation, clinical pregnancy, live birth and early pregnancy loss rates compared with long GnRH agonist protocol. However, more studies in large numbers of cycles are needed to confirm that increased serum LH level by E(2) pre-treatment during COH has no negative effect on the IVF/ICSI outcomes.

Highly purified hMG versus recombinant FSH in ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists--a randomized study

BACKGROUND

Highly purified hMG (hp-hMG) has recently shown better cycle outcome than the recombinant FSH (rFSH) when compared in GnRH agonist long protocol cycles. However, they have not yet been compared in GnRH antagonist cycles.

METHODS

A RCT comparing the ongoing pregnancy rate (primary end-point) in 280 patients undergoing IVF/ICSI after stimulation with hp-hMG or rFSH controlled with a GnRH antagonist.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between hp-hMG and rFSH in terms of the ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle (35.0 versus 32.1%, respectively; P = 0.61); relative risk: 1.09 (95% confidence interval: 0.78-1.51; risk difference: 2.9%). No differences were observed for implantation, clinical pregnancy and pregnancy loss rates. More oocytes were obtained from patients receiving rFSH then hMG (14.4 +/- 8.1 versus 11.3 +/- 6.0, respectively; P = 0.001). Estradiol was higher at the end of stimulation in the hp-hMG group (P = 0.02), whereas progesterone was higher in patients stimulated with rFSH (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A similar outcome was observed for hp-hMG and rFSH when used for stimulation in GnRH antagonist cycles. However, some differences were found in ovarian response in terms of oocyte yield and hormonal profile. Clinical Trials.gov

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00669786.

Understanding the role of LH: myths and facts

This review summarizes a series of lectures given at a recent Continuing Medical Education meeting in Hamburg, Germany (May 2007), aiming to understand the role of luteinizing hormone (LH) in follicular development during the natural menstrual cycle and controlled ovarian stimulation. Clinical situations and target groups of patients who might benefit from LH supplementation during their ovarian stimulation were discussed and defined. The lectures updated knowledge on the physiology of LH during the normal menstrual cycle and the role of LH in ovarian stimulation. The concept of the 'LH window' was presented, and the use of LH supplementation in different groups of patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation was discussed, including those with advanced age, hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism, pituitary down-regulation and poor response. In addition, the different ways of using LH or human chorionic gonadotrophin supplementation in ovulation induction protocols were described.

Effects and clinical significance of GnRH antagonist administration for IUI timing in FSH superovulated cycles: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the administration of GnRH antagonist in gonadotropin intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles with cycles where no intervention took place.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of published prospective randomized trials.

PATIENTS(S)

Five hundred twenty-one patients who were administered a GnRH antagonist and 548 conservatively treated patients who served as control subjects were included in the meta-analysis.

INTERVENTION(S)

STUDY SELECTION

Prospective trials were retrieved from Medline and Cochrane Library (last update October 2006). Random effect analysis was used in this meta-analysis. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinical pregnancy rates.

RESULT(S)

Six comparisons were retrieved including 1,069 patients. Higher pregnancy rates were found in the randomized controlled trials (odds ratio [OR] 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.33) when a GnRH antagonist was added to a gonadotropin superovulated IUI protocol. Early published studies with smaller sample sizes showed stronger associations (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.15-4.63) than later studies (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.79-2.23).

CONCLUSION(S)

From the randomized controlled trials of this meta-analysis, it is clear that allowing for follicle growth and avoiding premature LH rise, increased pregnancy rates are observed with GnRH antagonist administration. A parallel trend for multiple pregnancy rates in the GnRH antagonist group was observed, although this did not reach statistical significance. The flexible regimen was widely used. This meta-analysis of early data might enhance further research in this direction.

Recombinant LH supplementation to recombinant FSH during induced ovarian stimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol: a meta-analysis

This study aims to compare the efficacy of recombinant LH (rLH) supplementation for ovarian stimulation in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone-antagonist protocol for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Search strategies included online surveys of databases. The fixed effects model was used for odds ratio (OR) and effect size (weighted mean difference, WMD). Five trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. When the meta-analysis was carried out, advantages were observed for the LH supplementation protocol with respect to higher serum oestradiol concentrations on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration P < 0.0001; WMD: 514, 95% CI 368, 660) and higher number of mature oocytes (P = 0.0098; WMD: 0.88, 95% CI 0.21, 1.54). However, these differences were not observed in the total amount of recombinant FSH (rFSH) administered, days of stimulation, number of oocyets retrieved, the clinical pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval, the implantation rate and miscarriage rate. This result demonstrates that the association of rLH with rFSH may prevent any decrease in oestradiol after antagonist administration and that a significantly higher number of mature oocytes was available for laboratory work. Nevertheless, it failed to show any statistically significant difference in clinically significant end-points in IVF (implantation and pregnancy rates). Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results further.

Clinical outcome following stimulation with HMG versus highly purified HMG in patients undergoing ICSI

Current purification processes allow the production of highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-HMG), with human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) constituting most of its LH-like activity. This retrospective study aimed to compare the effectiveness of HP-HMG to the widely used traditional human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) preparation. A total of 174 women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles were allocated to either HMG or HP-HMG for ovarian stimulation. The number of mature oocytes was significantly higher in the HP-HMG group (14.72 +/- 7.81) than in the HMG group (12.15 +/- 11.07) (P < 0.05). However, the number of good quality embryos was not significantly different between both groups (HMG: 1.65 +/- 1.54; HP-HMG: 1.78 +/- 1.41). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in number of embryos transferred per woman (HMG: 3.95 +/- 1.87; HP-HMG: 4.27 +/- 1.60). The pregnancy rate per woman was 38.39% versus 51.79% in the HMG- and HP-HMG-treated groups respectively. These findings suggest that HP-HMG produces more mature oocytes than ordinary HMG, but similar pregnancy rates.

Effects of oral contraceptive, synthetic progestogen or natural estrogen pre-treatments on the hormonal profile and the antral follicle cohort before GnRH antagonist protocol

BACKGROUND

Steroid pre-treatments may be useful to program GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles. This prospective study assessed hormonal and ultrasound data collected during the free period after the discontinuation of three different pre-treatments to provide information on the optimal time interval required before starting stimulation.

METHODS

Women were randomized to receive oral contraceptive pill (OCP) [ethinyl estradiol (E(2)) 30 microg + desogestrel 150 microg] (n = 21) or norethisterone 10 mg/day (n = 23) or 17-betaE(2) 4 mg/day (n = 25) or no pre-treatment (n = 24) for one cycle before IVF. Assessments were performed on post-treatment day (PD) 1, 3 and 5, or on spontaneous cycle day (CD) 1 and 3.

RESULTS

After OCP and progestogen administration, FSH and LH concentrations shifted from strongly suppressed PD1 levels to PD5 values similar to those observed on CD1. Meanwhile, follicle sizes remained small up to PD5. In contrast, estrogen pre-treatment poorly reduced FSH levels on PD1 compared with OCP or progestogen. Consequently, follicle size was more heterogeneous. FSH rebound was maximal on PD3, whereas LH levels were slightly increased up to PD5.

CONCLUSIONS

A 5-day free interval after OCP or progestogen offers the advantages of gonadotrophin recovery and homogeneous follicular cohort, whereas early FSH rebound occurring after estrogen pre-treatment argues for a short free period.

LH in the follicular phase: neither too high nor too low

The role of LH in the natural menstrual cycle is not disputed. However, there are a variety of opinions regarding the potential role of exogenous LH in ovulation induction and whether it is actually needed. Recent years have seen renewed interest in this issue for several reasons. First, ovulation-inducing drugs are increasingly being administered to normally ovulating women. Second, recombinant human FSH products completely devoid of LH activity are now available. Third, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues (agonists and antagonists) prevent the untimely LH surge but also suppress endogenous LH activity during the follicular phase. This review analyses whether or not all patients need LH for follicular growth stimulation and new opportunities for improved treatment as a result of the availability of recombinant human LH both in patients with ovulatory disorders (World Health Organization (WHO) groups I and II anovulatory patients) and those undergoing multiple follicular development for assisted reproduction.

Ovarian feedback, mechanism of action and possible clinical implications

The secretion of gonadotrophins from the pituitary in women is under ovarian control via negative and positive feedback mechanisms. Steroidal and non-steroidal substances mediate the ovarian effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary system. During the follicular phase of the cycle, estradiol (E(2)) plays a key role, while circulating progesterone (at low concentrations) and inhibin B contribute to the control of LH and FSH secretion respectively. During the luteal phase, both E(2) and progesterone regulate secretion of the two gonadotrophins, while inhibin A plays a role in FSH secretion. The intercycle rise of FSH is related to changes in the levels of the steroidal and non-steroidal substances during the luteal-follicular transition. In terms of the positive feedback mechanism, E(2) is the main component sensitizing the pituitary to GnRH. Activity of a non-steroidal ovarian substance, named gonadotrophin surge-attenuating factor (GnSAF), has been detected after ovarian stimulation. It is hypothesized that GnSAF, by antagonizing the sensitizing effect of E(2) on the pituitary, regulates the amplitude of the endogenous LH surge at midcycle. Disturbances in the feedback mechanisms can occur in various abnormal conditions or after treatment with pharmaceutical compounds that interfere with the production or the action of endogenous hormones.

Is there a need for recombinant human luteinizing hormone (lutropin alfa) supplementation in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction?

Luteinizing hormone is now available as the recombinant product, lutropin alfa for the treatment of female infertility. It is necessary in the natural process of follicular growth and maturation. It is not yet clear which patients really benefit from the addition of this medication to conventional gonadotropin stimulation procedures in infertility treatment. Certainly, it has a proven benefit in patients suffering from hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (WHO I). Others may be older patients, patients with a profound gonadotropin suppression stimulated in long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocols, or patients with poor ovarian response to conventional stimulation strategies. The available data are reviewed herein.