When to avoid creating surplus human embryos

Perspectives on Spare Embryos amongst IVF users: An Exploratory Study from a Selected District of the Southern Indian State of Karnataka

Perspectives of IVF users on their spare embryos is a less explored subject in the Indian context despite the country's population and abundance of IVF clinics. We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth interviews in a selected district of the Indian state of Karnataka. Seven individuals were recruited independently of any assistance from an IVF clinic. The interviews explored participants' knowledge and perception of the spare embryos using a set of guiding questions exploring the theme of the informed consent process, views on research, preferences for embryo donation, the role of family and the dynamics of decision-making, amongst other things. The interviews were qualitatively analysed using Corbin and Strauss's grounded theory approach. Our findings reveal that the participants do not learn about the prospects of spare embryos from the very start of their IVF journeys, and they may not be informed about the various options available to decide the fate of the spare embryos. Irrespective of their views on research and moral perceptions of embryos, participants expressed a sense of responsibility and ownership towards their embryos and a general reluctance to donate them. Our findings have implications for guiding future inquiries on this subject, which can better the informed consent process and unravel the role of ownership in the ethics of spare embryos in the Indian context.

Natural cycle IVF: evaluation of 463 cycles and summary of the current literature

PURPOSE

Natural cycle (NC) IVF/ICSI has proven to be an alternative to conventional IVF/ICSI cycles.

METHODS

Within our retrospective, observational study (n = 159) infertile couples underwent (n = 463) cycles of NC-IVF/ICSI from May 2007 until December 2011. Oocyte pick-up was performed within a pure natural cycle excluding any hormonal stimulation except of hCG for ovulation induction. Oocytes were fertilized by IVF/ICSI and embryo transfer took place 2 or 3 days later. In addition, the current literature was analysed concerning pregnancy rates in NC-IVF/ICSI cycles.

RESULTS

Oocyte pick-up was performed in n = 463 NC and was successful in n = 342 cases (IVF n = 135, ICSI n = 207). 203 oocytes were fertilized (IVF n = 87, ICSI n = 116, FR 59.4 %) and lead to 192 embryo transfers. Finally, 25 pregnancies were reached (PR 13.0 % per transfer) resulting in four biochemical pregnancies, 7 (33.3 %) miscarriages, one pregnancy of unknown outcome and 13 live births. Within the current literature (n = 27 studies), PR in NC-IVF/ICSI cycles varied between 10.2 and 50 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Within our study, pregnancy rates in pure NC-IVF/ICSI remained below 15 %. Although this may be linked to unfavourable preconditions like patients' age >40 years, low ovarian reserve or long duration of infertility, further improvement is necessary to increase pregnancy rates.

Outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment in patients who electively inseminate a limited number of oocytes to avoid creating surplus human embryos for cryopreservation

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the outcome of IVF treatment in patients who electively inseminate a limited number of oocytes is comparable to that in a group of good-prognostic or poor-prognostic patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

SETTING

University-based tertiary fertility center.

PATIENT(S)

Two hundred three women under the age of 40 years.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients undergoing their first cycle of IVF who elected to have no more than four oocytes inseminated (study group) or who produced only four or fewer oocytes (poor-prognostic group) or who had excess embryos cryopreserved (good-prognostic group).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and ongoing pregnancy rate.

RESULT(S)

There were no significant differences in the implantation rate for the study group when compared with the good-prognostic group or the poor-prognostic group. The clinical pregnancy rate (62.5% vs. 64%) and ongoing-pregnancy or birth rate (56.3% vs. 60.7%) were similar between the study group and the good-prognostic group. However, the clinical pregnancy rate (62.5% vs. 29.7%) and ongoing-pregnancy rate (56.3% vs. 24.3%) were higher in the study group compared with the poor-prognostic group.

CONCLUSION(S)

Inseminating fewer oocytes in patients who elect not to cryopreserve excess embryos does not adversely affect their probability of conception.