Factor V Leiden mutation in relation to fecundity and miscarriage in women with venous thrombosis

Multiple thrombophilic single nucleotide polymorphisms lack a significant effect on outcomes in fresh IVF cycles: an analysis of 1717 patients

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to determine if thrombophilic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) affect outcomes in fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in a large general infertility population.

METHODS

A prospective cohort analysis was performed at a university-affiliated private IVF center of female patients undergoing fresh non-donor IVF cycles. The effect of the following thrombophilic SNPs on IVF outcomes were explored: factor V (Leiden and H1299R), prothrombin (G20210A), factor XIII (V34L), β-fibrinogen (-455G → A), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (4G/5G), human platelet antigen-1 (a/b9L33P), and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (C677T and A1298C). The main outcome measures included positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy, embryo implantation, live birth, and pregnancy loss.

RESULTS

Patients (1717) were enrolled in the study, and a total of 4169 embryos were transferred. There were no statistically significant differences in positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy, embryo implantation, live birth, or pregnancy loss in the analysis of 1717 patients attempting their first cycle of IVF. Receiver operator characteristics and logistic regression analyses showed that outcomes cannot be predicted by the cumulative number of thrombophilic mutations present in the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual and cumulative thrombophilic SNPs do not affect IVF outcomes. Therefore, initial screening for these SNPs is not indicated.

Recurrent spontaneous miscarriage is still a challenging diagnostic and therapeutic quagmire

Recurrent spontaneous miscarriage (RSM), affecting 1-2% of women of reproductive age seeking pregnancy, has been a clinical quagmire and a formidable challenge for the treating physician. There are many areas of controversy in the definition, aetiology, investigations and treatment of RSM. This review will address the many factors involved in the aetiology of RSM which is multifactorial in many patients, with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) being the most recognized aetiological factor. There is no identifiable cause in about 40-60% of these patients, in which case the condition is classified as idiopathic or unexplained RSM. The RSM investigations are extensive and should be undertaken in dedicated, specialized, well-equipped clinics/centres where services are provided by trained specialists. The challenges faced by the treating physician are even more overwhelming regarding the decision of what should be the most appropriate therapy offered to patients with RSM. Our review will cover the diverse modalities of therapy available including the role of preimplantation genetic testing using recent microarray technology, such as single nucleotide polymorphism and comparative genomic hybridization, as well as preimplantation genetic diagnosis; the greatest emphasis will be on the treatment of APS, and there will be important comments on the management of patients presenting with idiopathic RSM. The controversial areas of the role of natural killer cells in RSM, the varied modalities in the management of idiopathic RSM and the need for better-planned studies will be covered as well.

Time to conception and time to live birth in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage

STUDY QUESTION

What is the time to conception in a cohort of women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage (RM).

SUMMARY ANSWER

Median time to conception in women diagnosed with unexplained RM was 21 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 8-55 weeks), with a cumulative incidence of conception of 74% after 12 months of trying to conceive.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

There is no effective treatment in couples with unexplained RM. Adequate counselling about their prognosis, for example time to conception and time to a live birth, is therefore very important. So far, there are no studies that give insight on these issues.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A nested prospective cohort study was performed from February 2004 through July 2009 within a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled trial (ALIFE trial) on anticoagulant treatment in 364 women with unexplained RM.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 251 women who were not pregnant at the time of diagnosis of unexplained RM were included in this study. Of these, 13% became pregnant with ART, and all other women conceived naturally. The primary outcome was time to conception in weeks, calculated from the moment of diagnosis until conception measured by a urinary HCG. Secondary outcome was time to a live birth in the subsequent pregnancy. The relative prognostic significance of female age, the number of preceding miscarriages, interventions within the trial and the presence or absence of a preceding late miscarriage, a previous live birth and factor V Leiden mutation, was evaluated by Cox regression for time to conception and by competing risk modelling for time to live birth, respectively.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The cumulative incidence of conception was 56% after 6 months, 74% after 12 months and 86% after 24 months of which 65% resulted in a live birth. The median time to conception was 21 weeks (IQR 8-55 weeks). Of potential prognostic factors, the presence of the factor V Leiden mutation resulted in a significantly shorter median time to conception of 11 weeks for carriers versus 23 weeks for non-carriers (hazard ratio (HR) 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-3.65). The cumulative incidence of a live birth of the subsequent pregnancy was 0% after 6 months, 23% after 12 months and 50% after 24 months. The median time to a live birth of the subsequent pregnancy was 102 weeks (IQR 82-115 weeks). The number of previous miscarriages was the only prognostic factor (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.94) significantly associated with time to a live birth of the subsequent pregnancy.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

In our study only the subsequent pregnancy after diagnosing unexplained RM was included. A future collection of cumulative follow-up data of all the women included in this cohort may provide outcomes of all pregnancies following the diagnosis of unexplained RM.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Time to conception in women diagnosed with unexplained RM appears to be comparable with time to conception in healthy fertile women, as reported in the literature. The interesting finding that women with Factor V Leiden mutation have a significant shorter time to conception may suggest a favourable embryo implantation process. Future research is needed to confirm these findings and unravel the biology of early implantation.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The RCT used for this nested cohort study was funded by a grant (945-27-003) from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and a grant from GlaxoSmithKline. Study drugs (aspirin and placebo) were packaged and donated by Meda Pharma. This analysis was supported by a VIDI innovative research grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) 016.126.364. There are no potential conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This cohort study was nested in the randomized controlled trial; ALIFE study (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN 58496168).

The association between thrombophilic gene mutations and recurrent pregnancy loss

PURPOSE

To determine whether the Factor V (1691G/A), Factor V HR2 (4070A/G), Prothrombin (20210G/A), PAI-1 (-675 I/D, 5G/4G), ACE (intron 16 I/D), Factor VII (Gln353Arg), Factor XIII (Val34Leu), β-fibrinogen (-455G/A), Glycoprotein Ia (807C/T), tPA (intron 8 D/I) gene mutations could be risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).

METHODS

Genotyping of thrombophilic gene mutations were carried out by amplification Refractory Mutation System-PCR (ARMS-PCR) method after DNA extraction.

RESULTS

We found that the mutant allele frequencies of Factor V (1691G/A), Factor V HR2 (4070A/G), Prothrombin (20210G/A), PAI-1 (-675 I/D, 5G/4G), Factor XIII (Val34Leu) and β-fibrinogen (-455G/A) were more seen in the case group compared with the healthy control; However, the difference between the two group is not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Whilst the mutant allele frequencies of other studied genes were lower in the case in comparison to the fertile control women (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our data has shown that the prevalence of thrombophilic gene mutations was similar in women with RPL and healthy controls. Therefore, it appears that further studies on large-scale population and other genetic variants will be needed to conclusively find candidate genes for RPL unknown etiology in the future.

Hereditary thrombophilia, anti-beta2 glycoprotein 1 IgM, and anti-annexin V antibodies in recurrent pregnancy loss

PROBLEM

We investigated the beta2-glycoprotein I and anti-annexin V antibodies as anti-phospholipid-cofactor antibodies; and factor V G1691A Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T mutations as hereditary thrombophilia in recurrent pregnancy losses (RPL).

METHOD OF STUDY

Study group consisted of 84 women with recurrent pregnancy loss and control group consisted of 84 women having at least one live birth.

RESULTS

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T homozygous mutation was detected in 28.5% of the study group and in 14.2% of the controls, and the difference was highly significant (P < 0.001). Heterozygous mutation of this gene was found in 64.3% of the study population and in 38.1% of the controls, and difference in heterozygous mutation frequency was also significant (P < 0.001). Both homozygous and heterozygous mutations of PT G20210A and factor V G1691A were not different between the groups. There was no significant difference in anti-annexin V levels and anti-beta2-gp 1 levels of the groups.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that both homozygous and heterozygous mutations of MTHFR C677T were related with RPL in Caucasian women.

Hereditary thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss: a retrospective cohort study of pregnancy outcome and obstetric complications

BACKGROUND

The association among hereditary thrombophilia, recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and obstetric complications is yet uncertain. The objective of the study was to assess the prognostic value of the factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin (PT) mutations for the subsequent chance of live birth for women with RPL.

METHODS

Pregnancy outcome was recorded in a retrospective cohort of 363 women with a minimum of three consecutive pregnancy losses (early miscarriage, late miscarriage or stillbirth/neonatal death) who were not treated with anticoagulation therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 363 women, 29 were FVL-mutation carriers and 6 were PT-mutation carriers. The unadjusted live birth rate was 45.7% in FVL/PT carriers versus 63.4% in FVL/PT non-carriers, P = 0.04. The adjusted odds ratio for live birth in FVL/PT carriers was 0.48 (95% CI = 0.23-1.01), P = 0.05. Among the obstetric complications, only excessive bleeding was found to be associated with FVL/PT mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

In the unadjusted analysis, FVL and PT mutations have a negative prognostic impact on the live birth rate in women with RPL; however, when adjusting for significant covariates, the results no longer reach statistical significance. Strong conclusions on the association between obstetric complications and hereditary thrombophilia cannot be drawn from this study. Whether anticoagulation therapy would improve the prognosis in women with RPL and FVL/PT mutations remains to be documented in large randomized controlled trials.

Increased sperm count may account for high population frequency of factor V Leiden

BACKGROUND

Factor V Leiden (FVL) increases the risk of venous thrombosis and pregnancy loss in carriers. Nevertheless, this relatively old mutation is prevalent in Caucasion populations, which could be explained by positive selection pressure. Men with FVL have previously been found to have higher fecundity (the time between marriage and first pregnancy). Whether this is caused by increased sperm counts in men with FVL is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether men with factor V Leiden have increased sperm counts.

PATIENTS/METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study among 1139 consecutively included male partners of subfertile couples presenting at our university hospital for fertility workup between January 2000 and July 2007. All potential candidates who gave informed consent were included, irrespective of their fertility workup. In this retrospective analysis, we excluded participants with known causes of spermatogenic function or azoospermia. Subsequently, we genotyped all participants and compared sperm counts between FVL carriers and non-carriers.

RESULTS

We identified 37 FVL carriers and 921 non-carriers. FVL carriers had higher total sperm counts and total motile sperm counts than non-carriers: 236 x 10(6) (95% CI 158-292 x 10(6)) vs. 163 x 10(6) (95% CI 147-178 x 10(6)) and 81 x 10(6) (95% CI 54-105 x 10(6)) vs. 52 x 10(6) (95% CI 48-57 x 10(6)), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study that indicates that an increased incidence of a genotype may be controlled by increased sperm counts. However, the finding that men with FVL had higher total (motile) sperm counts was not statistically significant and needs confirmation in other studies.

Factor V Leiden mutation: a treatable etiology for sporadic and recurrent pregnancy loss

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that the thrombophilic G1691A factor V Leiden (FVL) gene mutation was a common, significant, and treatable cause of sporadic and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).

DESIGN

We compared the frequency of the FVL mutation in 141 women with >or=1 pregnancy and 1 sporadic pregnancy loss (308 live births, 141 pregnancy losses), 44 women with >or=1 pregnancy and >or=3 pregnancy losses (105 live births, 180 pregnancy losses), and 638 women with >or=1 live birth pregnancy and 0 pregnancy loss (1553 live births).

SETTING

Outpatient Clinical Research Center.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 823 caucasian women with consecutive measures of the FVL mutation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

We used polymerase chain reaction techniques to characterize the thrombophilic FVL G1691A gene mutation.

RESULT(S)

Of the 638 controls, 47 (7.4%) had FVL heterozygosity versus 16 heterozygous and 2 homozygous FVL cases (18/141, 12.8%) in 141 women with 1 sporadic pregnancy loss versus 9/44 RPL cases (20.5%, 8 heterozygous and 1 homozygous FVL). The FVL frequency in cases with 1 sporadic pregnancy loss (18/141, 12.8%) did not differ from RPL cases (9/44, 20.45%).

CONCLUSION(S)

After unexplained sporadic pregnancy loss, as well as after RPL, to provide the option to prospectively optimize subsequent live birth outcomes with low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis, we suggest that measurements be done of the FVL mutation, a treatable etiology for sporadic pregnancy loss as well as for RPL.

Frequency of Uterine Malformations Among Women in a Restricted Gene Pool Community

This random, retrospective cross-sectional study was performed to determine the frequency of uterine malformation in restricted gene pool communities. During 2003—2006, 800 women from the community of LaCrete in northern Alberta, Canada (known restricted gene pool for over 500 years), participated. Of the participants, 156 (19.5% of the study population) showed some form of structural uterine malformation. This is 5.5 times higher than what is reported in the general population. All 156 subjects were further investigated with magnetic resonance imaging, 3D sonography, hysterosalpingiography, hysteroscopy, and laparoscopy. These tests revealed that 30 of these women had no previous pregnancies or live births, 40 had one or more previous pregnancies and live births and more than two miscarriages, and 55 had recurrent miscarriages. This study has provided new insights into the increasing number of uterine malformations in the LaCrete population. The significantly higher prevalence of uterine malformations in a restricted gene pool community compared to the reported prevalence in the general population might indicate a direct link between a lack of genetic diversity and the development of uterine malformations in women.

Evidence-based investigations and treatments of recurrent pregnancy loss

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The majority of investigations and treatments offered to women with recurrent pregnancy loss are not evidence-based. In this review a critical analysis is given of the current management of recurrent pregnancy loss often recommended in meta-analyses and guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

Our knowledge of genetic, endocrine, thrombophilic and immunological causes of recurrent pregnancy loss has been improved significantly, primarily by the introduction of modern laboratory techniques. Most clinical trials in this area, however, are still subject to serious methodological flaws.

SUMMARY

At present, the clinician must base their clinical practice on the few high-quality observational studies and intervention trials available rather than on meta-analyses, as there is a scarcity of good clinical trials. More high-quality clinical studies are urgently needed in this area.

Gender-specific association of the factor V Leiden mutation with fertility and fecundity in a historic cohort. The Leiden 85-Plus Study

BACKGROUND

Factor V Leiden (FVL, Arg506Gln) mutation may facilitate embryo implantation and increase fertility and fecundity. This was studied in subjects who were of childbearing age in a time with minimal fertility control without modern contraceptive methods.

METHODS

From 1986 to 1999, 1502 inhabitants of Leiden, The Netherlands, reaching the age of 85 years were enrolled in the Leiden 85-Plus Study. Of 1176 subjects the FVL status was analysed, in 365 male and 811 female subjects.

RESULTS

The FVL carrier rate was 4.3%. Fertility was not affected by FVL status. In male subjects, fecundity (interval between marriage and birth of first child) was significantly increased in FVL carriers; 67% of male FVL carriers had a child within 371 days of marriage (therefore conceived within 3 months of marriage), compared with 19% of male non-carriers [relative risk (RR), 3.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.1-5.7; P < 0.001]. Within 6 months of marriage, 75% of male FVL carriers had conceived a child compared with 34% male non-carriers (RR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-3.2; P = 0.01). In female subjects, fecundity was not influenced by FVL status.

CONCLUSION

Fecundity is increased in male FVL carriers; in female subjects, no such association was observed.

Future directions of failed implantation and recurrent miscarriage research

Recurrent implantation failure is today the major reason for women completing several IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection attempts without having achieved a child, and is probably also the explanation for many cases of unexplained infertility. Most causes of recurrent miscarriage are still poorly elucidated, but from a theoretical point of view recurrent implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage are suggested to have partly overlapping causes. Recent research has indeed documented that both syndromes can be caused by the same embryonic chromosomal abnormalities and the same maternal endocrine, thrombophilic and immunological disturbances. Consequently, many treatments attempting to normalize these abnormalities have been tested or are currently used in women with both recurrent implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage. However, no treatment for the two syndromes is at the moment sufficiently documented to justify its routine use. In this review, an overview is given regarding present knowledge about causes that may be common for recurrent implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage, and suggestions are put forward for future research that may significantly improve understanding and treatment options for the syndromes.