Abnormal cervical cytology in women eligible for IVF

Human papillomavirus infection in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization: effects on embryo development kinetics and live birth rate

BACKGROUD

Several studies showed that human papillomavirus (HPV) affects male fertility, but its impact on female fertility and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome is not yet clear.

METHODS

Objective of this observational, prospective, cohort study was to evaluate the prevalence of HPV infection in women candidate to IVF, and the effects of HPV infection on the kinetic of embryonic development and on IVF outcome. A total number of 457 women candidate to IVF were submitted to HR-HPV test; among them, 326 underwent their first IVF cycle and were included in the analysis on IVF results.

RESULTS

8.9% of women candidate to IVF were HPV-positive, HPV16 being the most prevalent genotype. Among the infertility causes, endometriosis was significantly more frequent in HPV-positive than in negative women (31.6% vs. 10.1%; p < 0.01). Granulosa and endometrial cells resulted HPV-positive in 61% and 48% of the women having HPV-positive cervical swab, respectively. Comparing HPV-positive and negative women at their first IVF cycle, no significant difference was observed in the responsiveness to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in terms of number and maturity of retrieved oocytes, and of fertilization rate. The mean morphological embryo score was comparable in the two groups; embryos of HPV-positive women showed a quicker development in the early stages, with a significantly shorter interval between the appearance of pronuclei and their fusion. In the following days, embryo kinetic was comparable in the two groups until the early blastocyst stage, when embryos of HPV-positive women became significantly slower than those of HPV-negative women. Overall, these differences did not affect live birth rate/started cycle, that was comparable in HPV-positive and negative women (22.2 and 28.1%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

(a) the prevalence of HPV infection in women candidate to IVF is similar to that observed in the general female population of the same age range; (b) HPV infection migrates along the female genital apparatus, involving also the endometrium and the ovary, and perhaps participates in the genesis of pelvic endometriosis; (c) HPV slightly affects the developmental kinetic of in vitro-produced embryos, but does not exert an effect on live birth rate.

Effect of human papilloma virus infection on in-vitro fertilization outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To identify, appraise and summarize the available data concerning the impact of human papilloma virus (HPV) infection on reproductive outcome following in-vitro fertilization (IVF).

METHODS

We searched for studies in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Lilacs and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to March 2017. Any type of HPV infection assessed through polymerase chain reaction, subfertility factors and IVF indications and protocols were considered. Our primary outcomes were live birth/ongoing pregnancy and miscarriage, while secondary outcomes included clinical and laboratory parameters. We planned subgroup analyses according to the status of cervical cytology and presence of infection in the male partner. We assessed the relative risk (RR), using a random-effects model; heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Quality of the evidence was evaluated using the recommendations of the GRADE Working Group.

RESULTS

From the 14 studies eligible for inclusion, quantitative data from 10, evaluating 299 women with HPV infection and 2049 women without HPV infection, were included in the analysis. The pooled results showed no significant difference between HPV-infected and non-infected women in rates of live birth/ongoing pregnancy (RR, 1.16 (95% CI, 0.88-1.53); I²  = 0%; six studies, 983 women), clinical pregnancy (RR, 1.06 (95% CI, 0.74-1.54); I²  = 61%; eight studies, 1173 women) or miscarriage (RR, 1.58 (95% CI, 0.93-2.69); I²  = 8%; six studies, 290 clinical pregnancies). The overall quality of the evidence was very low, downgraded two levels because of serious limitations of the included studies (observational studies) and imprecision. In contrast, pooled results in the subgroup analysis based on the presence of infection in the male partner showed significant differences in rates of live birth/ongoing pregnancy (RR, 0.43 (95% CI, 0.23-0.82); I²  = 0%; three studies, 429 participants; P = 0.01) and miscarriage (RR, 3.70 (95% CI, 1.94-7.05); I²  = 0%; two studies, 90 participants; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence is still inadequate to enable us to draw firm conclusions regarding the effect of HPV infection in women on the most important reproductive outcomes following IVF; however, it suggests that the effect is not large for rates of live birth/ongoing pregnancy and clinical pregnancy. When infection is present in the male partner, it seems that there is a negative effect on live birth/ongoing pregnancy rate and an increase in miscarriage rate, a finding that should be interpreted with caution, owing to the very low quality of evidence supporting it. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Human Papillomavirus Infection, Infertility, and Assisted Reproductive Outcomes

The human papillomavirus (HPV) is a sexually transmitted infection common among men and women across all geographic and socioeconomic subgroups worldwide. Recent evidence suggests that HPV infection may affect fertility and alter the efficacy of assisted reproductive technologies. In men, HPV infection can affect sperm parameters, specifically motility. HPV-infected sperm can transmit viral DNA to oocytes, which may be expressed in the developing blastocyst. HPV can increase trophoblastic apoptosis and reduce the endometrial implantation of trophoblastic cells, thus increasing the theoretical risk of miscarriage. Vertical transmission of HPV during pregnancy may be involved in the pathophysiology of preterm rupture of membranes and spontaneous preterm birth. In patients undergoing intrauterine insemination for idiopathic infertility, HPV infection confers a lower pregnancy rate. In contrast, the evidence regarding any detrimental impact of HPV infection on IVF outcomes is inconclusive. It has been suggested that vaccination could potentially counter HPV-related sperm impairment, trophoblastic apoptosis, and spontaneous miscarriages; however, these conclusions are based on in vitro studies rather than large-scale epidemiological studies. Improvement in the understanding of HPV sperm infection mechanisms and HPV transmission into the oocyte and developing blastocyst may help explain idiopathic causes of infertility and miscarriage.

Human papillomavirus infection and fertility alteration: a systematic review

Background

HPV is the most prevalent sexually transmitted infection and its effect in cancer induction is well documented. HPV infections are mostly asymptomatic, but it is unclear whether HPV infections can result in alterations of reproductive health.

Objective

To determine the relationship between human papillomavirus infections and reproductive health in both men and women.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed in PubMed and ScienceDirect data bases from January 1994 through August 2014.

Results

HPV infections are shown to be significantly associated to many adverse effects in the reproductive function. These adverse effects were reported in different levels from cells production to pregnancy and may be related to the infecting genotype.

Conclusions

It appears from this study that HPV detection and genotyping could be of great value in infertility diagnosis at least in idiopathic infertility cases. Like for the risk of carcinogenesis, another classification of HPV regarding the risk of fertility alteration may be considered after deep investigations.

Does ovarian stimulation for IVF increase gynaecological cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether ovarian stimulation for IVF increases the risk of gynaecological cancer, including ovarian, endometrial, cervical and breast cancers, as an independent risk factor. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Clinical trials that examined the association between ovarian stimulation for IVF and gynaecologic cancers were included. The outcomes of interest were incidence rate of gynaecologic cancers. Twelve cohort studies with 178,396 women exposed to IVF were included; 10 studies were used to analyse ovarian (167,640 women) and breast (151,702 women) cancers, and six studies were identified in the analysis of endometrial (116,672 women) and cervical cancer (114,799 women). Among these studies, 175 ovarian, 48 endometrial, 502 cervical and 866 cases of breast cancer were reported. The meta-analysis found no significant association between ovarian stimulation for IVF and increased ovarian, endometrial, cervical and breast cancer risk (odds ratio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 to 1.32; OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.63; OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.60; OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.76, respectively). Ovarian stimulation for IVF, therefore, does not increase the gynaecologic cancer risk, whether hormone-dependent endometrial and breast cancer or non-hormone-dependent ovarian and cervical cancer.

The prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology in women with infertility

The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of abnormal cervical cytology in women with infertility problems with that of fertile women by using ThinPrep® liquid-based Pap Tests™. A retrospective case-control study for over 2 years was conducted. The cases included all women with infertility problems who had Pap tests during their infertility treatment period. The cases were further subdivided into primary and secondary infertility groups. The control group included all women without infertility problems who had routine Pap tests in the same period. The age and demographic features were adjusted and matched for both groups. Statistical analysis included chi-square test and Fischer exact test. The infertility group (n = 490) showed significantly (P < 0.05) more abnormal cervical squamous epithelial abnormalities (48 positive cases, 9.8%) than the controls (n = 7,150, 216 positive cases, 3%). Women with secondary infertility had more epithelial abnormalities and more high-grade lesions than women with primary infertility. Women with infertility had statistically significant higher frequency of squamous intraepithelial lesions than women without infertility problems of similar age and demographic background. The data suggest that women with infertility might benefit from more frequent cervical cytology screening.

The prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology in women with systemic lupus erythematosus

To compare the frequency of abnormal cervical cytology in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with that of healthy women without connective tissue diseases by using ThinPrep® liquid based Pap Tests(TM) . A retrospective case-control study over 2 years was conducted. The cases included all women with SLE who had Pap tests during their treatment period. The control group included all women without SLE or other connective tissue diseases (CTDs) that had routine Pap tests in the same period. The age and demographic features were adjusted and matched for both groups. Statistical analysis included Chi-Square test and Fischer exact test. The SLE group (n= 55) showed significantly (P < 0.05) more abnormal cervical squamous epithelial abnormalities [14 positive cases (25.4%) than the controls (n = 8,175, with 285 positive cases (3.5%)]. Women with SLE had statistically significant higher frequency and prevalence of squamous intraepithelial lesions than women without SLE of similar age and demographic background. The data suggested that women with SLE might benefit from more frequent cervical cytology screening.

Prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology among subfertile Saudi women

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Since cervical cancer is reportedly the seventh most frequent cancer in women in Saudi Arabia and the eighth most frequent cancer among women aged between 15 and 44 years, we wanted to determine the prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology among subfertile women attending the reproductive medicine unit of a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, hospital-based study. A Pap smear was done for 241 of 493 (48.9%) subfertile women from January 2008 through February 2009.

RESULTS

The Pap smear was normal in 166 of 241 patients (67.9%), abnormal in 71 (29.5%), and unsatisfactory for evaluation in 4 (1.7%). According to the revised Bethesda system, epithelial cell abnormality was found in 7 (2.9%), inflammation in 55 (22.8%), and infection in 9 (3.7%) patients. Epithelial cell abnormalities were further classified as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) (n=3, 42.8%), atypical squamous cells of high grade (ASC-H) (n=1, 14.3%), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) (n=2, 28.5%), and glandular cell abnormalities (AGS) (n=1, 14.3%).

CONCLUSION

The high prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology in our subfertile women accentuates the need for screening in patients eligible for in vitro fertilization. In addition, a well-organized screening program for cervical cell abnormalities at the national level should be implemented to allow identification of subfertile women at risk so that potentially life-saving measures can be undertaken early.

Relationship of cytopathology and cervical infection to outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a relationship exists between in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) outcome and cervical infection or presence of human papillomavirus (HPV).

METHOD

Cervical scrapes, digital colposcopies, and cervical biopsies were performed in 1044 Chinese women undergoing IVF for tubal infertility or, in their partners, abnormal semen. The pregnant (n=415) and nonpregnant (n=629) groups differed neither in clinical signs of cervical inflammation nor in rate of HPV detection.

RESULTS

There were no associations between IVF-ET outcome and infection rate, degree of cytopathologic abnormality, detection of HPV, or results of digital colposcopy and cervical biopsy. Cytologic results did not correlate with any of the clinical parameters of IVF-ET.

CONCLUSIONS

No association was found between IVF-ET outcome and cervical infection, cytopathologic result, HPV detection, or result from the colposcopy or biopsy. Extensive testing and treatment for cervical infection do not appear necessary in IVF-ET candidates.