Comparison of different gonadotrophin preparations in intrauterine insemination cycles for the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective, randomized study

The importance of infertility duration and follicle size according to pregnancy success in women undergoing ovulation induction with gonadotropins and intrauterine insemination

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of infertility duration and dominant follicle size measured on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) administration on pregnancy rates in infertile women undergoing ovulation induction (OI) with gonadotropin (GND). A total of 352 patients aged 20 to 41 years who were diagnosed with unexplained infertility or polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) were included in this study. Patients with a history of multifollicular development or follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) value more than 12 IU/ml were excluded from the study. The demographic and clinical features of the patients were obtained from the patients' files and hospital automation system and recorded for each woman. The demographic and clinical features of the patients were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups as live birth (group 1, n = 47) and non-live birth groups (group 2, n = 305). There were no statistically significant differences in regard to age, infertility type, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level, oestradiol (E2) level, antral follicle count (AFC), cycle characteristics, GND type, number of follicles, E2 level and endometrial thickness on HCG day, total GND dose, dominant follicle size (p > 0.05). Infertility duration in group 1 was 3.5 ± 2.1; in group 2, 4.7 ± 3.9 years. This difference was statistically significant (p = .014). According to this study, live birth rates after GND + IUIs(intrauterine insemination) were significantly affected by the duration of infertility. But the dominant follicle size and endometrial thickness measured on HCG day in GND and IUI cycles did not have a significant effect on pregnancy rates.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on the subject? It is thought that the timing of the ovarian triggering is vital for the success of intrauterine insemmination (IUI) treatment.What do the results of this study add? According to our results live birth rates after GND + IUIs were significantly affected by the duration of infertility.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? It is determined that the duration of infertility is significant and patients should be encouraged to the treatment as soon as possible.

The definition of unexplained infertility: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on tests required to either diagnose unexplained infertility or use for research inclusion criteria. This leads to heterogeneity and bias affecting meta-analysis and best practice advice.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review analyses the variability of inclusion criteria applied to couples with unexplained infertility. We propose standardised criteria for use both in future research studies and clinical diagnosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

CINAHL and MEDLINE online databases were searched up to November 2022 for all published studies recruiting couples with unexplained infertility, available in full text in the English language.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were collected in an Excel spreadsheet. Results were analysed per category and methodology or reference range.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 375 relevant studies, only 258 defined their inclusion criteria. The most commonly applied inclusion criteria were semen analysis, tubal patency and assessment of ovulation in 220 (85%), 232 (90%), 205 (79.5%) respectively. Only 87/220 (39.5%) studies reporting semen analysis used the World Health Organization (WHO) limits. Tubal patency was accepted if bilateral in 145/232 (62.5%) and if unilateral in 24/232 (10.3%). Ovulation was assessed using mid-luteal serum progesterone in 115/205 (56.1%) and by a history of regular cycles in 87/205 (42.4%). Other criteria, including uterine cavity assessment and hormone profile, were applied in less than 50% of included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the heterogeneity among studied populations with unexplained infertility. Development and application of internationally accepted criteria will improve the quality of research and future clinical care.

Retrospective analysis: The application of human menopausal gonadotropin combined with letrozole for IUI in patients undergoing artificial insemination by husband due to unexplained or mild male factors

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) combined with letrozole (LE) to HMG only for ovarian stimulation on pregnancy outcome of infertile patients undergoing artificial insemination by husband (AIH) due to unexplained or mild male factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Infertile patients with unexplained or mild male factors treated from July 2015 to December 2021 were selected as subjects. The patients were divided into two groups according to the ovarian stimulation schemes they received, namely HMG combined with LE or HMG only. We analyzed the laboratory examination results before drug treatment (baseline) and during ovarian stimulation and compared the pregnancy outcomes of the two groups using univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 526 cycles of 372 couples were included. The univariate analysis showed that the clinical pregnancy rate of the HMG combined with LE group was 24.8%, significantly higher than that of the HMG group (14.8%, P = 0.007). The live birth rate (19.9%) of the HMG combined with LE group were also significantly higher than those of the HMG group (11.2%, respectively). In multivariate logistic analysis, the age of males was negatively associated with the clinical pregnancy rate (OR 0.874, 95% CI 0.793~0.963, P=0.006) and live birth (OR0.875, 95% CI 0.783~0.977, P=0.018). Moreover, ovarian stimulation with HMG+LE was the only beneficial factor significantly associated with clinical pregnancy (OR 1.929, 95% CI 1.068~3.485, P=0.029) and live birth (OR 2.255, 95% CI 1.188~4.282, P=0.013).

CONCLUSION

Ovarian stimulation using HMG combined with LE can increase the clinical outcomes (live birth and clinical pregnancy) among infertile patients undergoing AIH due to explained or mild male factors.

The İmpact of gonadotropin type on controlled ovarian stimulation and İntrauterine İnsemination cycle outcomes

Background:

Intrauterine insemination (IUI) combined with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) results in higher pregnancy rates. However, there is still no consensus on the optimal COS protocol.

Aims:

In the present study, we aimed to analyse the effects of COS protocols with different gonadotropin types on IUI outcomes.

Study Setting and Design:

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the infertility clinic of a University hospital, including 237 COS + IUI cycles.

Materials and Methods:

Eligible cycles were divided into three groups according to the type of gonadotropin used for COS; cycles with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) (group 1, n = 36), highly purified FSH (HP-FSH) (group 2, n = 178) and highly purified menotropin (HP-hMG) (group 3, n = 23). Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) per cycle were compared between groups.

Statistical Analysis Used:

The Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis test were used to compare numerical variables. Dunn test was used for multiple comparisons.

Results:

The duration of stimulation and total gonadotropin dose were similar between the three groups (P > 0.05). The CPR was 16.7% in rFSH group, 9.6% in HP-FSH group and 13.0% in HP-hMG group. The LBR was 16.7% in rFSH group, 8.4% in HP-FSH group and 13.0% in HP-hMG group. Both CPR and LBR were comparable in all three groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions:

Ovarian stimulation with rFSH, HP-FSH and HP-hMG show similar COS characteristics. Furthermore, these three gonadotropin protocols for COS + IUI yielded comparable CPR and LBR. These findings suggest that all three gonadotropin types (rFSH, HP-FSH, HP-hMG) are similarly effective in COS + IUI cycles.

Agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in ovulatory women with infertility

BACKGROUND

Intrauterine insemination (IUI), combined with ovarian stimulation (OS), has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for infertile couples. Several agents for ovarian stimulation, combined with IUI, have been proposed, but it is still not clear which agents for stimulation are the most effective. This is an update of the review, first published in 2007.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination in infertile ovulatory women.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and two trial registers from their inception to November 2020. We performed reference checking and contacted study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included truly randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different agents for ovarian stimulation combined with IUI for infertile ovulatory women concerning couples with unexplained infertility. mild male factor infertility and minimal to mild endometriosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

In this updated review, we have included a total of 82 studies, involving 12,614 women. Due to the multitude of comparisons between different agents for ovarian stimulation, we highlight the seven most often reported here. Gonadotropins versus anti-oestrogens (13 studies) For live birth, the results of five studies were pooled and showed a probable improvement in the cumulative live birth rate for gonadotropins compared to anti-oestrogens (odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 1.79; I² = 30%; 5 studies, 1924 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of live birth following anti-oestrogens is assumed to be 22.8%, the chance following gonadotropins would be between 23.7% and 34.6%. The pooled effect of seven studies revealed that we are uncertain whether gonadotropins lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared with anti-oestrogens (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.60 to 4.17; I² = 58%; 7 studies, 2139 participants; low-certainty evidence). Aromatase inhibitors versus anti-oestrogens (8 studies) One study reported live birth rates for this comparison. We are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors improve live birth rate compared with anti-oestrogens (OR 0.75, CI 95% 0.51 to 1.11; 1 study, 599 participants; low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of live birth following anti-oestrogens is 23.4%, the chance following aromatase inhibitors would be between 13.5% and 25.3%. The results of pooling four studies revealed that we are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors compared with anti-oestrogens lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate (OR 1.28, CI 95% 0.61 to 2.68; I² = 0%; 4 studies, 1000 participants; low-certainty evidence).  Gonadotropins with GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) agonist versus gonadotropins alone (4 studies) No data were available for live birth. The pooled effect of two studies  revealed that we are uncertain whether gonadotropins with GnRH agonist lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared to gonadotropins alone (OR 2.53, 95% CI 0.82 to 7.86; I² = 0; 2 studies, 264 participants; very low-certainty evidence).  Gonadotropins with GnRH antagonist versus gonadotropins alone (14 studies) Three studies reported live birth rate per couple, and we are uncertain whether gonadotropins with GnRH antagonist improve live birth rate compared to gonadotropins (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.52 to 4.39; I² = 81%; 3 studies, 419 participants; very low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of a live birth following gonadotropins alone is 25.7%, the chance following gonadotropins combined with GnRH antagonist would be between 15.2% and 60.3%. We are also uncertain whether gonadotropins combined with GnRH antagonist lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared with gonadotropins alone (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.28; I² = 0%; 10 studies, 2095 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Gonadotropins with anti-oestrogens versus gonadotropins alone (2 studies) Neither of the studies reported data for live birth rate. We are uncertain whether gonadotropins combined with anti-oestrogens lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared with gonadotropins alone, based on one study (OR 3.03, 95% CI 0.12 to 75.1; 1 study, 230 participants; low-certainty evidence). Aromatase inhibitors versus gonadotropins (6 studies) Two studies  revealed that aromatase inhibitors may decrease live birth rate compared with gonadotropins (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.71; I²=0%; 2 studies, 651 participants; low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of a live birth following gonadotropins alone is 31.9%,  the chance of live birth following aromatase inhibitors would be between 13.7% and 25%. We are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors compared with gonadotropins lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.06 to 8.17; I²=77%; 3 studies, 731 participants; very low-certainty evidence).  Aromatase inhibitors with gonadotropins versus anti-oestrogens with gonadotropins (8 studies) We are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors combined with gonadotropins improve live birth rate compared with anti-oestrogens plus gonadotropins (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.3 8 to 2.54;  I² = 69%; 3 studies, 708 participants; very low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of a live birth following anti-oestrogens plus gonadotropins is 13.8%, the chance following aromatase inhibitors plus gonadotropins would be between 5.7% and 28.9%. We are uncertain of the effect of aromatase inhibitors combined with gonadotropins compared to anti-oestrogens combined with gonadotropins on multiple pregnancy rate (OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.39 to 4.37;  I² = 0%; 5 studies, 901 participants; low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available results, gonadotropins probably improve cumulative live birth rate compared with anti-oestrogens (moderate-certainty evidence). Gonadotropins may also improve cumulative live birth rate when compared with aromatase inhibitors (low-certainty evidence). From the available data, there is no convincing evidence that aromatase inhibitors lead to higher live birth rates compared to anti-oestrogens. None of the agents compared lead to significantly higher multiple pregnancy rates. Based on low-certainty evidence, there does not seem to be a role for different combined therapies, nor for adding GnRH agonists or GnRH antagonists in IUI programs.

Effects of letrozole combined with human menopausal gonadotrophin in ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination cycles

Background

The effects of letrozole plus human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) on ovarian stimulation (OS) of intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles were examined.

Methods

In all, 1,005 IUI cycles were included in this study. Couples underwent natural cycle (NC) IUI (n=150) or IUI after OS with letrozole (n=207) or IUI after OS with letrozole + HMG (n=648).

Results

The clinical pregnancy rates were 9.0%, 13.0%, and 17.0%, and the live birth rates were 7.0%, 9.0%, and 14.0% in the NC, letrozole, and letrozole + HMG IUI groups, respectively. The twin pregnancy rate of the letrozole + HMG group (11.0%) was higher than that of the NC (7.0%) and letrozole groups (4.0%). To date, the only triplet pregnancies to occur were in the letrozole + HMG group. On the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), the number of follicles with an average follicle diameter greater than 18 mm in the letrozole + HMG group (1.21±0.56) and letrozole group (1.14±0.48) was greater than that in the NC group (0.85±0.36). The thickness of the endometrium in the letrozole + HMG group (8.8±2.1 mm) was significantly greater than that in the letrozole group (7.3±1.6 mm).

Conclusions

The letrozole + HMG protocol of OS in IUI can improve follicular development, increase the thickness of endometrium, significantly increase the live birth rate, but not significantly increase the multiple pregnancy rate.

Intrauterine insemination as a primary viable option to infertile couples: evaluation of patients in a private center

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify which parameters positively affect the clinical pregnancy rates of IUI cycles and find which couples should opt for IUI.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 261 patients submitted to 381 IUI cycles with fresh or cryopreserved partner semen (IU-H) from January 2012 to February 2017 in a private center in Curitiba-PR, Brazil.

RESULTS

Idiopathic infertility was the most frequent finding (35.9%). Patients younger than 40 years accounted for 87.9% of the IUI cycles (n=335) and 16.1% of the clinical pregnancies (n=54). The pregnancy rate was three times higher in patients with an endometrium thickness ≥8 mm compared to patients with endometrium thickness <8mm. Sperm motility >55% was linked to higher pregnancy rates (p=0.002). Concerning gonadotropins, 159 (48.4%) took rFSH, 127 (38.7%) hMG, and 42 (12.8%) uFSH, with pregnancy rates of 21.3%, 10.4% and 10.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients under 40 years of age with endometrium thickness ≥8 mm, sperm motility >55%, and on rFSH had significantly higher pregnancy rates (p<0.05).

An Intrauterine Insemination Audit at Tertiary Care Hospital: A 4½ Years' Retrospective Analysis of 800 Intrauterine Insemination Cycles

BACKGROUND

There are many variables that may influence the success rates of intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatment. Therefore, a regular audit program is needed for planning effective infertility treatment and improving pregnancy outcomes.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this study was to identify the crucial predicting factors that can influence the IUI success.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 800 IUI cycles done from January, 2013 to August, 2017 in 651 couples with various etiologies of infertility. The common etiologies included female factor of ovulatory dysfunction, tubal, endocrinal, male factor, male and female factors combined, and unexplained factors. Ovulation induction was done either by clomiphene citrate (CC) alone or in combination of CC with gonadotropins or pure gonadotropins only. Human chorionic gonadotropin trigger was given when at least one dominant follicle measuring ≥18 mm with an endometrial thickness of >7 mm was obtained. IUI was done post 36 h of trigger. The double-density gradient method was the preferred method of sperm preparation.

RESULTS

In 800 cycles in corresponding 651 couples, the total outcome was 113 pregnancies (14.1%) per cycle with overall pregnancy rate (PR) per couple of 17.3%. The highest PR was observed in the patient with ovulatory dysfunction (21.2%), followed by patients with combined factor (15.1%) and male factor (14.7%). In the study, a higher PR was achieved in the female ≤25 years (18.9%) P < 0.04 with significant findings with duration of infertility ≤5 years (15.1%) having primary infertility (14.5%) with low body mass index <25 (14.1%). IUI success rate was highest in the first cycle (14.6%) followed by second cycle (14.0%) and third cycle (3.5%).

CONCLUSION

IUI audit enables the characterization of prognostic factors to achieve improved PR. This study identifies the factors that can predict improved pregnancy outcome in women age ≤25 years and endometrium thickness between 9 and 11 mm. We also recommend IUI as a first line of infertility treatment for couples in low-income setting provided the women age and duration of infertility are acceptably low.

Effect of Gonadotropin Types and Indications on Homologous Intrauterine Insemination Success: A Study from 1251 Cycles and a Review of the Literature

Objective

To evaluate the IUI success factors relative to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and infertility type, this retrospective cohort study included 1251 couples undergoing homologous IUI.

Results

We achieved 13% clinical pregnancies and 11% live births. COS and infertility type do not have significant effect on IUI clinical outcomes with unstable intervention of various couples' parameters, including the female age, the IUI attempt rank, and the sperm quality.

Conclusion

Further, the COS used seemed a weak predictor for IUI success; therefore, the indications need more discussion, especially in unexplained infertility cases involving various factors. Indeed, the fourth IUI attempt, the female age over 40 years, and the total motile sperm count <5 × 10⁶ were critical in decreasing the positive clinical outcomes of IUI. Those parameter cut-offs necessitate a larger analysis to give infertile couples more chances through IUI before carrying out other ART techniques.

Factors affecting clinical pregnancy rates after IUI for the treatment of unexplained infertility and mild male subfertility

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate intrauterine insemination (IUI) clinical experiences and to define the variables for predicting success.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present study was an observational trial performed in a private IVF center on subfertile couples who had applied for treatment between 2002 and 2012, in which the data of 503 IUI cases were retrospectively reviewed. Couples who had been diagnosed with unexplained and mild male subfertility were included. The primary outcome measure was the clinical pregnancy rate in an attempt to form a predictive model for the odds of a clinical pregnancy. Recorded parameters were used to determine the prediction model.

RESULTS

Utilizing univariate logistic regression analysis, clinical pregnancy was positively associated with the duration of infertility (OR=1.09, p=0.089), secondary infertility (OR=1.77, p=0.050), and +4 sperm motility after preparation (OR=1.03, p=0.091). Following an adjustment analysis involving a multivariate logistic regression, clinical pregnancy was still found to positively associate with secondary infertility (OR=2.51, p=0.008).

CONCLUSION

IUI success in secondary infertile couples who were in the unexplained infertility and mild male subfertility groups was higher than that in primary infertile couples, and the chances of pregnancy increased as sperm numbers with +4 motility increased. It is difficult to concomitantly evaluate all these parameters and to determine a predictive parameter in IUI independent from other factors.

A Preliminary Report of A Low-Dose Step-Up Regimen of Recombinant Human FSH for Young Women Undergoing Ovulation Induction with IUI

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-FSH) low-dose step-up regimen for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in patients undergoing ovulation induction (OI) with intrauterine insemination (IUI).

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan. In this prospective, observational study, consecutive infertile women (20-35 years) with regular menstrual cycles and a normal baseline FSH level were prospectively enrolled between January 2010 and September 2010. A starting dose of 112.5 IU/day r-FSH was administered on day 3 and increased by 37.5 IU/day every 2 days until a follicle ≥11 mm in diameter was present. Recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (r-hCG) was administered when a follicle ≥18 mm was noted. Monifollicular development was defined as only one follicle with a diameter ≥16 mm. Clinical pregnancy was defined as a pregnancy diagnosed by ultrasonographic visualization of one or more gestational sacs.

Results

A total of 29 women and 30 cycles were included. The mean daily dose of r-FSH to achieve a follicle of ≥11 mm in diameter was 131.3 ± 23.6 IU and the mean total dose was 1030.0 ± 383.2 IU. Approximately 41% of the cycles were monofollicular. Clinical pregnancy was observed in 9 (30.0%) cycles, and a fetal heart beat was observed in 7 (23.3%). There were no multiple pregnancies. Mild ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, which was resolved with conservative management, was observed in 3 (10.0%) cycles.

Conclusion

This r-FSH low-dose step-up regimen seems to be a feasible and practical method for OI in younger infertile women undergoing IUI.

Influence of follicle rupture and uterine contractions on intrauterine insemination outcome: a new predictive model

OBJECTIVE

To correlate the detection of follicle rupture and the number of uterine contractions per minute with the outcome of IUI and to build a predictive model for the outcome of IUI including these parameters.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Fertility clinic.

PATIENT(S)

We analyzed data from 610 women who underwent homologous or donor double IUI from 2005 to 2010 and whose data of uterine contractions or follicle rupture were recorded.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Live-birth rate.

RESULT(S)

Nine hundred seventy-nine IUI cycles were included. The detection of follicle rupture (odds ratio [OR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-3.01) and the number of uterine contractions per minute (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.02-2.74) assessed after the second insemination procedure of a double IUI were positively correlated with the live-birth rate. A multiple logistic regression model showed that sperm origin, maternal age, follicle count at hCG administration day, follicle rupture, and the number of uterine contractions observed after the second insemination procedure were significantly associated with the live-birth rate.

CONCLUSION(S)

Follicle rupture and uterine contractions are associated with the success of an IUI cycle. This may open new possibilities to improve the methodology of IUI.

Predictive factors for pregnancy during the first four intrauterine insemination cycles using gonadotropin

PURPOSE

Although a variety of factors have been reported as affecting pregnancy rates after intrauterine insemination (IUI), there have been conflicting results on prognostic factors. This study aimed to determine predictive factors for pregnancy in patients undergoing the first four IUI cycles.

METHODS

A total of 348 IUI cycles using clomiphene citrate or letrozole combined with gonadotropin, or gonadotropin only were analyzed. Baseline clinical characteristics, variables related to ovulation induction and sperm parameters were compared between pregnant (n = 54) and non-pregnant groups (n = 294). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors that could predict a pregnancy.

RESULTS

The overall clinical pregnancy rate was 15.5% (54/348) per cycle and 30.0% (54/180) per couple. During the first four IUI cycles, logistic regression analysis revealed that woman who were 39 years or older (OR: 0.263, 95% CI: 0.076-0.906, p = 0.034), longer duration of infertility (OR: 0.967, 95% CI: 0.942-0.993, p = 0.012), endometriosis (versus unexplained infertility; OR: 0.177, 95% CI: 0.040-0.775, p = 0.022) and endometrial thickness below 7 mm (OR: 0.114, 95% CI: 0.015-0.862, p = 0.035) were unfavorable factors to predict clinical pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with old age, longer duration of infertility, the presence of endometriosis or thin endometrium in the preovulatory phase may have unfavorable outcomes during the first four IUI cycles.

Advantages of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone over human menopausal gonadotropin for ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination: a randomized clinical trial in unexplained infertility

OBJECTIVE

To compare two different gonadotropin preparations, human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH), combined with clomiphene citrate (CC) in women with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI).

STUDY DESIGN

In this prospective clinical trial, couples prepared for IUI cycles were randomly allocated to two groups either to receive CC and hMG (group A, n=127) or CC and rFSH (group B, n=132) for ovarian stimulation. Outcomes including rates of clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, OHSS, multiple pregnancy, cancellation, and live birth were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Duration of gonadotropin therapy was significantly shorter in group B (5.1±0.84 vs. 4.7±0.8 days, CI=95%, P<0.001). The total dose of administered gonadotropin was also significantly lower in group B (386.9±68.2 vs. 348.2±56.3IU, CI=95%, P<0.001). Dominant follicle number (>17mm), mean follicular diameter, and endometrial thickness on the day of hCG injection were similar. Clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancies, abortion, live birth, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and cancellation rates were not statistically different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

IUI cycles in which rFSH had been administered may require shorter duration and a lower total gonadotropin dose.

The use of ultrasound during intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility may improve pregnancy outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of ultrasound guidance in intrauterine insemination (IUI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted. The data was collected from the records of 197 couples with unexplained infertility who underwent IUI with a total of 267 IUI cycles in the in vitro fertilization center of our hospital between January 2009 and December 2010.

RESULTS

Of the 267 IUI cycles, 145 were carried out as US-guided, while 122 cycles IUI were performed with a blind procedure. In the US-guided IUI and blinded IUI groups, the pregnancy rates were 23.4 and 13.9%, respectively. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p = 0.049), thereby indicating that US guidance improves pregnancy rates. In the US-guided IUI group, 9.7% of the cases were difficult, while in the blinded IUI group, 26.2% were difficult and the difference between the groups was also statistically significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

US guidance in IUI improves pregnancy rates and reduces the frequency of difficult IUI.

Comparison of different starting gonadotropin doses (50, 75 and 100 IU daily) for ovulation induction combined with intrauterine insemination

Purpose

To prevent multiple pregnancies the goal of ovulation induction by gonadotropins is to achieve only mono-follicular development. The most important issue is therefore to determine the starting dose. The aim of this study is to compare three different starting doses of follitropin beta to assess the lowest effective dose.

Methods

We evaluated 92 cycles with ovarian stimulation for patients with unexplained infertility, anovulatory disorder or mild male factor. We prospectively divided patients into 50, 75 and 100 IU groups based on patients’ response to clomiphene citrate treatment.

Results

We performed 87 intrauterine inseminations (95 % of cycles with ovulation induction). Five cycles were cancelled. We achieved 15 pregnancies; total pregnancy rate was 18 %. Pregnancy rate was 22, 10 and 28 % in 50, 75 and 100 IU follitropin beta groups. The average number of follicles was 2.0 ± 0.8, 2.2 ± 1.1 and 2.5 ± 1.8 (ns), total dose of gonadotropins (IU) 483 ± 192, 600 ± 151 and 830 ± 268 (p < 0.001), respectively. We observed one case of twins in 75 and 100 IU treatment group, as well (25 % risk).

Conclusions

This study suggests that based on the dose which was chosen according to clomiphene citrate response, all treatment regimes were effective for ovulation induction. 50 IU of follitropin beta daily is the appropriate starting dose to support ovulation for clomiphene citrate-sensitive women. The disadvantage may be an increased risk of cycle cancellation due to low ovarian response. Daily doses 75 or 100 IU of rFSH increase total consumption of gonadotropins.

Comparisons of GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF

BACKGROUND

In view of the discrepancies about the GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant) ovarian stimulation protocols having some potential advantages compared with the GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) protocols in poor ovarian responders IVF/ICSI, a meta-analysis of the published data was performed to compare the efficacy of GnRH-ant versus GnRH-a protocols for ovarian stimulation in IVF poor response patients.

METHODS

We searched for all published articles indexed in MEDLINE (1950-2010), EMBASE (1974-2010) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, 1994-2010). Any randomized controlled study that compared the GnRH-ant with GnRH-a in ovarian stimulation protocols for poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI was included, and data were extracted independently by two reviewers. The searches yielded 64 articles, from which 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. We performed this meta-analysis involving 566 IVF patients in a GnRH-ant protocol group and 561 patients in a GnRH-a protocol group with Review Manager 4.2 software. Odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate dichotomous and continuous data, respectively.

RESULTS

Fourteen eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. GnRH-ant protocols resulted in a statistically significantly lower duration of stimulation compared with GnRH-a protocols (P = 0.04; WMD: -1.88, 95% CI: -3.64, -0.12), but there was no significant difference in the number of oocytes retrieved (P = 0.51; WMD: -0.17, 95% CI -0.69, 0.34) or the number of mature oocytes retrieved (P = 0.99; WMD: -0.01, 95% CI: -1.14, 1.12). Moreover, no significant difference was found in the cycle cancellation rate (CCR, P = 0.67; OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.71-1.42) or clinical pregnancy rate (CPR, P = 0.16; OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.92, 1.66).

CONCLUSIONS

Clear advantage was gained in duration of stimulation with GnRH-ant in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF, although there was no statistical difference in the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of mature oocytes retrieved, the CCR and CPR between GnRH-ant and GnRH-a protocols. These results may be helpful to our clinical practice. However, further controlled randomized prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed.

The potential use of intrauterine insemination as a basic option for infertility: a review for technology-limited medical settings

Objective. There is an asymmetric allocation of technology and other resources for infertility services. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a process of placing washed spermatozoa transcervically into the uterine cavity for treatment of infertility. This is a review of literature for the potential use of IUI as a basic infertility treatment in technology-limited settings. Study design. Review of articles on treatment of infertility using IUI. Results. Aspects regarding the use of IUI are reviewed, including ovarian stimulation, semen parameters associated with good outcomes, methods of sperm preparation, timing of IUI, and number of inseminations. Implications of the finding in light of the needs of low-technology medical settings are summarized. Conclusion. The reviewed evidence suggests that IUI is less expensive, less invasive, and comparably effective for selected patients as a first-line treatment for couples with unexplained or male factor infertility. Those couples may be offered three to six IUI cycles in technology-limited settings.

Comparison of the effect of two different doses of recombinant gonadotropin for ovarian stimulation on the outcome of intrauterine insemination

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify an optimal stimulation protocol for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to obtain an acceptable pregnancy rate and low frequency of multiple pregnancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 340 patients, who received intrauterine insemination because of ovulation dysfunction, were enrolled in this study. Group I consisted of 203 patients who received recombinant FSH (r-FSH) 150U every other day as an ovulation induction agent. Group II consisted of 137 patients who received r-FSH 100U every other day as an ovulation induction agent. All patients in both groups also received clomiphene citrate 100 mg/day for consecutive five days from the fifth day of the cycle. Only patients with at least two follicles >18 mm on the human chorionic gonadotropin injection days were included in this study.

RESULTS

The clinical pregnancy rate was 14.8% (30/203) in Group I compared with 20.4% (28/137) in Group II, p > 0.05. The incidence of multiple pregnancy was 41.7% (10/24) in Group I compared with 12.5% (3/24) in Group II, p < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

The concurrent use of low-dose r-FSH and clomiphene citrate would seem not only to be cost-effective but also highly satisfactory in that it prevents high-order multiple pregnancies.

Recombinant FSH versus highly purified FSH in intrauterine insemination: systematic review and metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the pregnancy rates (PRs) in intrauterine insemination (IUI) using recombinant FSH (rec-FSH) or highly purified urinary FSH (HP-FSH).

DESIGN

Systematic review and metaanalysis.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

None.

INTERVENTION(S)

Electronic and manual searches.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

PR, per first cycle PR and per woman PR.

RESULT(S)

Six randomized trials (713 women, 1,581 cycles) were identified. In three the same doses of rec-FSH and HP-FSH were used ("equal dose" group), whereas in the other three the ratio HP-FSH:rec-FSH dose was 1.5. The global metaanalysis showed no differences in PRs. The PR per cycle was similar across the 1.5 ratio group (14.51% vs. 14.93%; relative risk [RR], 0.970; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.687-1.369). However, the metaanalysis of the equal dose group, showed differences in the PR in favor of rec-FSH (16.36% vs. 12.31%; RR, 1.394; 95% CI, 1.004-1.936). Per woman PR analysis showed similar results (41.44% vs. 31.55%; RR, 1.273; 95% CI, 0.987-1.643). Per first cycle PR analysis showed a similar trend, although the difference did not reach significance (RR, 1.434; 95% CI, 0.934-2.203).

CONCLUSION(S)

Rec-FSH was associated with higher per cycle PR than HP-FSH, when used at the same dose, whereas the PR were similar when the dose of rec-FSH was 50% lower.

A prospective randomized noninferiority study comparing recombinant FSH and highly purified menotropin in intrauterine insemination cycles in couples with unexplained infertility and/or mild-moderate male factor

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the noninferiority of highly purified menotropin (HP-hMG) compared with recombinant FSH (rFSH) regarding clinical pregnancy rate (PR) in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized noninferiority trial.

SETTING

Unit of physiopathology of human reproduction, university hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Five hundred twenty-three patients with unexplained infertility or mild male infertility undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IUI.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients were randomized for treatment with rFSH (262 patients) or HP-hMG (261 patients). Insemination was performed 34-36 hours after hCG injection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (PR). The secondary outcome was the number of interrupted cycles for high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and multiple pregnancy.

RESULT(S)

The clinical PR was 19.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.3%-25.1%) in the HP-hMG group and 21.4% (95% CI 16.9%-26.8%) in the rFSH group [absolute difference -1.7% (95% CI -8.6%-5.2%)]; therefore, the noninferiority was demonstrated. The number of interrupted cycles for OHSS risk and multiple pregnancy was significantLy higher in the rFSH group, 8.4% (95% CI 5.6%-12.4%) than in the HP-hMG group 1.2% (95% CI 0.4%-3.3%) [absolute difference -7.27% (95% CI -11.3 to -3.7)].

CONCLUSION(S)

HP-hMG is not inferior compared with rFSH regarding clinical PR.

Lyophilised hMG versus rFSH in women with unexplained infertility undergoing a controlled ovarian stimulation with intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomised study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of lyophilised urinary hMG (HP-hMG) with recombinant FSH (rFSH) in women with unexplained infertility undergoing a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination (IUI).

METHODS

Forty-nine consecutively seen women with unexplained infertility were randomised to a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with IUI cycle either with rFSH or HP-hMG. The outcome was compared by independent samples t-test.

RESULTS

The mean patient age and duration of infertility were not different (29.5 +/- 5.7 and 4.9 +/- 2.7 years in rFSH; 28.8 +/- 3.2 and 6 +/- 4.2 in HP-hMG group) (p = 0.6 and p = 0.2). The mean body mass index (BMI) and basal hormones were similar. Total dose of gonadotropin used (710 +/- 236 vs. 636 +/- 185 IU) and duration of the cycles (9 +/- 2.1 vs. 8.3 +/- 2.3 days) showed no significant difference (p = 0.2). Number of follicles, serum oestradiol (E2), and the endometrial thickness on the day of hCG were comparable. Two singletons in each group were obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that HP-hMG and rFSH may be equally suitable in mild ovarian stimulation for unexplained infertility. Further data derived from larger study population are needed to determine whether higher amounts of two gonadotropins in this subgroup might produce any benefits or unfavourable effects.

Efficacy of recombinant versus human derived follicle stimulating hormone on the oocyte and embryo quality in IVF-ICSI cycles: Randomised, controlled, multi-centre trial

The aim of this trial, comparing human follicle stimulating hormone (hFSH) and recombinant FSH (rFSH) was to evaluate the efficacy on oocyte and embryo quality in in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Four-hundred and one women were randomised in two groups to receive or hFSH or rFSH in stimulation protocols. The primary end point of this study was the oocyte/embryo quality. No significant difference in oocyte/embryo quality was observed between the two groups. The number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher in the hFSH group (6 +/- 2.8 in hFSH group vs. 5 +/- 2.6 in rFSH group; P = 0.003). A less amounts of gonadotropins consumed (2106 +/- 719 IU in hFSH group vs. 3536 +/- 1099 IU in rFSH group; P < 0.0001) and shorter duration of stimulation (human chorionic gonadotropin day of administration: Day 12.3 +/- 1.0 in hFSH and Day 13.3 +/- 1.2 in rFSH group, respectively; P < 0.0001) was registered in hFSH group. Fertilisation, cleavage and implantation rates, pregnancy and abortion rates were similar in both groups. However, lower clinical abortion rate (not significant) in hFSH group might be noteworthy. In our study, we demonstrated that hFSH and rFSH products are equivalent in terms of clinical efficacy.

Intrauterine insemination with husband semen: an evaluation of pregnancy rate and factors affecting outcome

PURPOSE

The aim was to determine pregnancy rate following intrauterine insemination (IUI) and its associated factors in a university assisted reproductive technique center in Tehran, Iran.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 350 IUI cycles with ovarian stimulation by clomiphene citrate and/or gonadotropins was performed.

RESULTS

The overall pregnancy rate was 22% (77/350). Of the 77 pregnancies, 88.3% resulted in live birth, 7.8% in spontaneous abortion, 2.6% in blighted ovum and 1.3% were ectopic. Logistic regression analysis revealed three predictive variables as regards pregnancy: number of the treatment cycle (OR:3.5 CI:1.9 - 6.4 p:0.006), duration of infertility (OR:2.1 CI:1.2 - 3.7 p = 0.001) and age (OR:2.15 CI:1.1 - 4.4 p = 0.04). Pregnancy rate did not have any independent relation to sperm count, type of infertility, number and size of follicle and side of ovulatory ovary.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that clomiphene citrate and/or gonadotropins IUI is a convenient and useful treatment option in women with younger age ( <30 years) and fewer treatment cycles and fewer infertility duration (4 years).