eSET irrespective of the availability of a good-quality embryo in the first cycle only is not effective in reducing overall twin pregnancy rates

Comparison of euploid blastocyst expansion with subgroups of single chromosome, multiple chromosome, and segmental aneuploids using an AI platform from donor egg embryos

PURPOSE

This retrospective observational study compares how different classes of blastocyst genotypes from egg donor cycles differentially blastulate and expand using a standard assay.

METHODS

Quantitative measurements of expansion utilized a customized neural network that segments all sequential time-lapse images during the first 10 h of expansion.

RESULTS

Analyses were performed using two developmental time perspectives using time-lapse imaging. The first was the time to blastocyst formation (tB), which broadly reflects variations in developmental rate. Euploidy peaked at 100-115 h from fertilization. In contrast, aneuploidy peaks flanked this interval bi-modally. These distributions limit ploidy discrimination based upon traditional standard grading features when assessed in real time. In contrast, from the second perspective of progressive blastocyst expansion that is normalized to each individual blastocyst's tB time, euploidy was significantly increased at expansion values > 20,000µ2 across all tB intervals studied. A Cartesian coordinate plot graphically summarizes information useful to rank order blastocysts within cohorts for transfer. Defined aneuploidy subgroups, distinguished by the number and complexity of chromosomes involved, also showed distributive differences from both euploids and from each other. A small subset of clinically significant trisomies did not show discriminating features separating them from other euploids.

CONCLUSION

A standard assay of blastocyst expansion normalized to each individual blastocyst's time of blastocyst formation more usefully discriminates euploidy from aneuploidy than real-time expansion comparisons using absolute developmental time from fertilization.

Twinning in ART: Single embryo transfer policy

It is more than thirty years that perinatologists and healthcare personnel aim to reduce the morbidity associated with multiple pregnancy. In many cases, these complications stem from pregnancies achieved through artificial reproductive technologies (ART). Although dramatic measures have been taken to control those risks by increasing the proportion of single embryo transfers, the multiple pregnancy rate still remains relatively high among patient conceived through ART, carrying risks to both mothers and newborns, and is coupled with the related economic burden associated with prematurity. The aim of this review is to provide the current evidence regarding single embryo transfer to assist decision-makers and to promote patient knowledge toward an elective policy to reduce the risk of twinning. Single embryo transfer may aid in the further reduction of multiple pregnancy and, in most cases, will maintain patient autonomy and right of choice.

Adding a low-quality blastocyst to a high-quality blastocyst for a double embryo transfer does not decrease pregnancy and live birth rate

INTRODUCTION

The effect of embryo quality on clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technology following a double transfer is not well defined, with some studies suggesting that a low-quality embryo transferred with a high-quality embryo decreases the live birth rate (LBR), compared with transferring a single high-quality embryo. Our study examined whether the quality of a second blastocyst transferred affects the outcome, controlling for the number of the available high-quality blastocysts (HQB).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A historical cohort study of 2346 fresh blastocyst transfers in a single fertility clinic between 2013 and 2019. The main outcomes were pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth, and multiple gestation rates. Outcomes were compared between single embryo transfers with a high-quality blastocyst (SET-H), double embryo transfers with two HQBs (DET-HH), and transfers with one high-quality and one low-quality blastocyst (DET-HL). Outcomes were also assessed between SET and DET when only low-quality blastocysts were available.

RESULTS

With one HQB available, DET-HL increased LBR (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.65, 95% CI 1.09-2.49) compared with SET-H, but increased multiple gestation rate (aOR 23.1, 95% CI 3.0-177.6). With two HQBs available, DET-HH was associated with a higher LBR (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.28-2.04) and lower miscarriage rate (aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.80), but very high twin rate (aOR 49.8, 95% CI 24.3-102.1) compared with SET-H. A SET-H with at least one or more HQB available to freeze, compared with a SET-H with no other HQB available, had a higher LBR (aOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.17-2.45). When there were no HQBs available, compared with SET-L, a DET-LL had a higher live birth (aOR 3.20, 95% CI 1.78-7.703) and twin rate (aOR 3.72 × 10¹⁰ ) and a lower miscarriage rate (aOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10-0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

When there is one HQB available, transferring an additional low-quality blastocyst would only slightly increase the LBR, but significantly increase the twin rate, therefore SET should be recommended. When two or more HQBs are available, SET-H would have a reasonably good chance of success without the very high twin rate associated with DET-HH. DET-LL when compared with SET-L, would increase the LBR, but increase the risk of multiple gestation.

Elective single embryo transfer- the power of one

Despite the highest historical live birth success rates for couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), there has been an epidemic of iatrogenic twin and higher order gestation conceived from this treatment. Continued improvement in cryopreservation techniques have allowed preservation of supernumerary embryos for use in future cycles, and refinements in culture systems and embryo selection have resulted in the transfer of fewer embryos while maintaining favorable pregnancy rates. The voluntary transfer of a single high quality embryo, elective single embryo transfer (eSET), has significantly reduced multiple gestation rates and maximized the rate of singleton pregnancy without compromising overall success rates. Although eSET is the standard of care in several developed countries, utilization in the United States has been slow. States with mandated IVF insurance have seen decreases in preterm birth rates yielding down stream health care savings. Herein, the evolution and future applications of this practice to reduce the risk of iatrogenic twins is reviewed.

The effect of single embryo transfer on perinatal outcomes in Japan

OBJECTIVE

In 2007 and 2008, the Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology issued a recommendation for single embryo transfer (SET). Thereafter, SET was implemented in 73% of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cases in Japan. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of compliance with the SET recommendation on perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

An electronic audit of the perinatal database of the Japanese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology was conducted from 2001 through 2010. The database comprised data of 610,726 women. Totally, 20,923 women conceived through IVF. To compare perinatal outcomes, these women were categorized into two study groups depending on whether they conceived before (2004-2005, n=3,865) or after (2009-2010, n=6,842) the SET recommendation statement was issued.

RESULTS

The proportion of women who conceived through IVF increased from 1.3% in 2001 to 4.8% in 2010. Compliance with the SET recommendation led to a decrease in the incidence of twin pregnancies (33.9% versus 13%, p<0.01), incidence of preterm delivery (odds ratio [OR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-0.59), low birth weight (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.39-0.45), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.65-0.76), but an increase in the incidence of monochorionic twins (1.6% versus 2.5%, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Compliance with the SET recommendation improved perinatal outcomes by reducing the incidence of twin pregnancies.

Sequential (hFSH + recFSH) vs homogenous (hFSH or recFSH alone) stimulation: clinical and biochemical (cumulus cell gene expression) aspects

FSH is a key hormone in the regulation of follicular development. Together with the EGF network, these molecules mediate oocyte maturation and competence in preparation for the action of LH. FSH isoforms regulate distinct biological pathways and have specific effects on granulosa cell function and maturation of the ovarian follicle. Their dynamic interactions occur during the follicular cycle; short-living forms are predominant in the pre-ovulatory phase, whereas long-acting molecules characterize the luteal-follicular transition. Recombinant FSH (rFSH) molecules have a reduced number of isoforms and are less acidic, with a shorter half-life. We have investigated sequential stimulation, comparing hFSH + rFSH, vs. rFSH alone and hFSH alone for the entire stimulation phase. Sequential stimulation leads to an E2 per MII oocyte ratio that is much lower than is seen during treatment with the two drugs individually. Although there is a positive tendency in favor of the sequential treatment, there was no significant difference in pregnancy rates, even taking frozen embryos into consideration. The cumulus cell transcriptome varies considerably between the treatments, although with no clear significance. When comparing pregnant vs. non-pregnant patients, in general a decrease in mRNA expression can be observed in the pregnant patients, especially in expression of folic acid receptor 1 and ovostatin 2. This indicates that material has been transferred from CC to the oocyte. However, a common observation in the literature is that variations in the transcriptome of the cumulus cells are highly dependent upon the patient genotype; the potential for applying this strategy as a basis for selecting embryos is, at the very least, questionable.

Top quality embryos at day 2: a prerequisite for single blastocyst transfer? An observational cohort study in women under 36

PURPOSE

While extended culture has been considerably improved, some questions remain regarding the application of Single Blastocyst Transfer (SBT).

METHODS

An observational cohort study was undertaken with 456 women under 36 years old and assigned to SBT on a voluntary basis. The main outcome was the cumulative delivery rate per couple according to the number of Top Quality Embryos (TQE) on day 2 (Group 1= > or =2 TQE, Group 2= 1 TQE and Group 3= 0 TQE).

RESULTS

Rate of transfer and mean number of frozen blastocyts were higher in Group 1 compared to Group 3. As a consequence, the cumulative delivery rate per couple was higher in Group 1 (47.9%) compared to Group 3 (34.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Single blastocyst transfer combining fresh and frozen cycles, might be a worthwhile strategy irrespective of embryo quality on day 2 providing good delivery rates while keeping the rate of multiple deliveries low.

Elective single embryo transfer: guidelines for practice British Fertility Society and Association of Clinical Embryologists

Assisted conception treatment is the single most important cause in the increase in multiple pregnancy and births over the last 25 years. Multiple births are associated with significant peri natal morbidity and mortality. Europe has led the way in reducing multiple births by widespread adoption of an elective single embryo policy, which in Belgium is linked to an increase in state funding. Randomized controlled trials suggest that an eSET policy must include the ability to cryopreserve and transfer any remaining quality embryos to obtain parity with a double embryo transfer. This document provides a review of the available evidence with guidelines for practice, to help facilitate the introduction of an eSET policy in the UK.