ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VIII: cycles from January to December 2005 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2006

ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XXI: PGT analyses in 2018

STUDY QUESTION

What are the trends and developments in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in 2018 as compared to previous years?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The main trends observed in this 21st dataset on PGT are that the implementation of trophectoderm biopsy with comprehensive whole-genome testing is most often applied for PGT-A and concurrent PGT-M/SR/A, while for PGT-M and PGT-SR, single-cell testing with PCR and FISH still prevail.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Since it was established in 1997, the ESHRE PGT Consortium has been collecting and analysing data from mainly European PGT centres. To date, 20 datasets and an overview of the first 10 years of data collections have been published.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

The data for PGT analyses performed between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 with a 2-year follow-up after analysis were provided by participating centres on a voluntary basis. Data were collected using an online platform, which is based on genetic analysis and has been in use since 2016.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

Data on biopsy method, diagnostic technology, and clinical outcome were submitted by 44 centres. Records with analyses for more than one PGT for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) and/or PGT for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR), or with inconsistent data regarding the PGT modality, were excluded. All transfers performed within 2 years after the analysis were included, enabling the calculation of cumulative pregnancy rates. Data analysis, calculations, and preparation of figures and tables were carried out by expert co-authors.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The current data collection from 2018 covers a total of 1388 analyses for PGT-M, 462 analyses for PGT-SR, 3003 analyses for PGT for aneuploidies (PGT-A), and 338 analyses for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A.The application of blastocyst biopsy is gradually rising for PGT-M (from 19% in 2016-2017 to 33% in 2018), is status quo for PGT-SR (from 30% in 2016-2017 to 33% in 2018) and has become the most used biopsy stage for PGT-A (from 87% in 2016-2017 to 98% in 2018) and for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A (96%). The use of comprehensive, whole-genome amplification (WGA)-based diagnostic technology showed a small decrease for PGT-M (from 15% in 2016-2017 to 12% in 2018) and for PGT-SR (from 50% in 2016-2017 to 44% in 2018). Comprehensive testing was, however, the main technology for PGT-A (from 93% in 2016-2017 to 98% in 2018). WGA-based testing was also widely used for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A, as a standalone technique (74%) or in combination with PCR or FISH (24%). Trophectoderm biopsy and comprehensive testing strategies are linked with higher diagnostic efficiencies and improved clinical outcomes per embryo transfer.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The findings apply to the data submitted by 44 participating centres and do not represent worldwide trends in PGT. Details on the health of babies born were not provided in this manuscript.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The Consortium datasets provide a valuable resource for following trends in PGT practice.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The study has no external funding, and all costs are covered by ESHRE. There are no competing interests declared.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XIX-XX: PGT analyses from 2016 to 2017†

STUDY QUESTION

What are the trends and developments in pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) in 2016–2017 as compared to previous years?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The main trends observed in this 19th and 20th data set on PGT are that trophectoderm biopsy has become the main biopsy stage for PGT for aneuploidies (PGT-A) and that the implementation of comprehensive testing technologies is the most advanced with PGT-A.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Since it was established in 1997, the ESHRE PGT Consortium has been collecting and analysing data from mainly European PGT centres. To date, 18 data sets and an overview of the first 10 years of data collections have been published.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

The data for PGT analyses performed between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017 with a 2-year follow-up after analysis were provided by participating centres on a voluntary basis. Data were collected using a new online platform, which is based on genetic analysis as opposed to the former cycle-based format.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Data on biopsy method, diagnostic technology and clinical outcome were submitted by 61 centres. Records with analyses for more than one PGT for monogenic/single gene defects (PGT-M) and/or PGT for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) indication or with inconsistent data regarding the PGT modality were excluded. All transfers performed within 2 years after the analysis were included enabling the calculation of cumulative pregnancy rates. Data analysis, calculations, figures and tables were made by expert co-authors.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The current data collection from 2016 to 2017 covers a total of 3098 analyses for PGT-M, 1018 analyses for PGT-SR, 4033 analyses for PGT-A and 654 analyses for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A.

The application of blastocyst biopsy is gradually rising for PGT-M (from 8–12% in 2013–2015 to 19% in 2016–2017), is status quo for PGT-R (from 22–36% in 2013–2015 to 30% in 2016–2017) and has become the preferential biopsy stage for PGT-A (from 23–36% in 2013–2015 to 87% in 2016–2017). For concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A, biopsy was primarily performed at the blastocyst stage (93%). The use of comprehensive diagnostic technology showed a similar trend with a small increased use for PGT-M (from 9–12% in 2013–2015 to 15% in 2016–2017) and a status quo for PGT-SR (from 36–58% in 2013–2015 to 50% in 2016–2017). Comprehensive testing was the main technology for PGT-A (from 66–75% in 2013–2015 to 93% in 2016–2017) and for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A (93%).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The findings apply to the data submitted by 61 participating centres and do not represent worldwide trends in PGT. Details on the health of babies born were not provided in this manuscript.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Being the largest data collection on PGT in Europe/worldwide, the data sets provide a valuable resource for following trends in PGT practice.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study has no external funding and all costs are covered by ESHRE. There are no competing interests declared.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XVI-XVIII: cycles from 2013 to 2015

STUDY QUESTION

What are the trends and developments in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in 2013–2015 as compared to previous years?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The main trends observed in the retrospective data collections 2013–2015, representing valuable data on PGT activity in (mainly) Europe, are the increased application of trophectoderm biopsy at the cost of cleavage stage biopsy and the continuing expansion of comprehensive testing technology in PGT for chromosomal structural rearrangements and for aneuploidies (PGT-SR and PGT-A).

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Since it was established in 1997, the ESHRE PGT Consortium has been collecting data from international PGT centres. To date, 15 data sets and an overview of the first 10 years of data collections have been published.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Collection of (mainly) European data by the PGT Consortium for ESHRE. The data for PGT cycles performed between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2015 were provided by participating centres on a voluntary basis. For the collection of cycle, pregnancy and baby data, separate, pre-designed MS Excel tables were used.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Data were submitted by 59, 60 and 59 centres respectively for 2013, 2014 and 2015 (full PGT Consortium members). Records with incomplete or inconsistent data were excluded from the calculations. Corrections, calculations, figures and tables were made by expert co-authors.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

For data collection XVI/XVII/XVIII, 59/60/59 centres reported data on 8164/9769/11 120 cycles with oocyte retrieval: 5020/6278/7155 cycles for PGT-A, 2026/2243/2661 cycles for PGT for monogenic/single gene defects, 1039/1189/1231 cycles for PGT-SR and 79/59/73 cycles for sexing for X-linked diseases. From 2013 until 2015, the uptake of biopsy at the blastocyst stage was mainly observed in cycles for PGT-A (from 23% to 36%) and PGT-SR (from 22% to 36%), alongside the increased application of comprehensive testing technology (from 66% to 75% in PGT-A and from 36% to 58% in PGT-SR).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The findings apply to the 59/60/59 participating centres and may not represent worldwide trends in PGT. Data were collected retrospectively and no details of the follow-up on PGT pregnancies and babies born were provided.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Being the largest data collection on PGT worldwide, detailed information about ongoing developments in the field is provided.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study has no external funding and all costs are covered by ESHRE. There are no competing interests declared.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Spinocerebellar Ataxia Patient Perceptions Regarding Reproductive Options

Background

In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing is a growing reproductive option for people who want to avoid passing a single-gene condition on to their offspring. The spinocerebellar ataxias are a group of rare, autosomal-dominant neurodegenerative disorders which are strong candidates for the use of this technology.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess knowledge of genetic risk and perceptions of reproductive options in individuals with a diagnosis of spinocerebellar ataxia.

Methods

We administered an online survey to U.S. residents of reproductive age who have been clinically or genetically diagnosed with spinocerebellar ataxia. We assessed their understanding of inheritance and their reproductive opinions.

Results

Of 94 participants, 70.2% answered all four inheritance questions correctly. The majority felt they could describe each reproductive option except prenatal diagnosis. Individuals were most interested in in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing: 48.4% (45 of 93) said they would consider it. They were least interested in prenatal diagnosis and donated embryos or gametes. Having spinocerebellar ataxia with anticipation and choosing inheritance risk as an important factor were both significantly associated with interest in preimplantation genetic testing. Choosing religion/morality as an important factor was associated with less interest in preimplantation genetic testing and prenatal diagnosis.

Conclusions

Our population displayed basic knowledge of inheritance risk, and the majority wanted to avoid having affected children. Consistent with literature for other autosomal-dominant adult-onset conditions, individuals showed a preference for preimplantation genetic testing. Health care providers should continue to educate patients about reproductive options and their risks and limitations.

Overview of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD): Historical Perspective and Future Direction

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) can be considered the earliest form of prenatal testing. It was first used in humans over 26 years ago. At its inception, PGD could only be performed for a limited number of genetic disorders. Technological advances in molecular biology and cytogenomics have been utilized in the field of PGD to greatly expand the spectrum of genetic disorders that can now be detected in early human embryos.

ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XIV-XV: cycles from January 2011 to December 2012 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2013

STUDY QUESTION

How does the data collection XIV-XV of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium compare with the cumulative data for data collections I-XIII?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The 14th and 15th retrospective collection represents valuable data on PGD/PGS cycles, pregnancies and children: the main trend observed is the increased application of array technology at the cost of FISH testing in PGS cycles and in PGD cycles for chromosomal abnormalities.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Since 1999, the PGD Consortium has collected, analysed and published 13 previous data sets and an overview of the first 10 years of data collections.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Data were collected from each participating centre using a FileMaker Pro database (versions 5-12). Separate predesigned FileMaker Pro files were used for the cycles, pregnancies and baby records. The study documented cycles performed during the calendar years 2011 and 2012 and follow-up of the pregnancies and babies born which resulted from these cycles (until October 2013).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHOD

Data were submitted by 71 centres (full PGD Consortium members). Records with incomplete or inconsistent data were excluded from the calculations. Corrections, calculations and tables were made by expert co-authors.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

For data collection XIV-XV, 71 centres reported data for 11 637 cycles with oocyte retrieval (OR), along with details of the follow-up on 2147 pregnancies and 1755 babies born. A total of 1953 cycles to OR were reported for chromosomal abnormalities, 144 cycles to OR for sexing for X-linked diseases, 3445 cycles to OR for monogenic diseases, 6095 cycles to OR for PGS and 38 cycles to OR for social sexing. From 2010 until 2012, the use of arrays for genetic testing increased from 4% to 20% in PGS and from 6% to 13% in PGD cycles for chromosomal abnormalities; the uptake of biopsy at the blastocyst stage (from <1% up to 7%) was only observed in cycles for structural chromosomal abnormalities, alongside the application of array comparative genomic hybridization.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The findings apply to the 71 participating centres and may not represent worldwide trends in PGD.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The annual data collections provide an important resource for data mining and for following trends in PGD/PGS practice.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

None.

Factors Influencing the Decision-Making Process and Long-Term Interpersonal Outcomes for Parents Who Undergo Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Fanconi Anemia: a Qualitative Investigation

Fanconi anemia (FA) is characterized by congenital malformations, progressive bone marrow failure, and predisposition to malignancy. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is used to treat FA, and best results are attained with sibling donors who are human leukocyte antigen (HLA) identical matches. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) offers parents of an affected child the opportunity to have an unaffected child who is an HLA match. While some research has investigated parents' experiences during the PGD process, no published studies specifically address factors influencing their decision-making process and long-term interpersonal outcomes. The aims of this study are to: (1) examine parents' expectations and the influence of media, bioethics, and religion on their decision to undergo PGD; (2) examine parents' social support and emotional experiences during their PGD process; and (3) characterize long-term effects of PGD on relationship dynamics (partner, family, friends), others' attitudes, and parental regret. Nine parents participated in semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis revealed their decision to use PGD was variously influenced by media, bioethics, and religion, in particular, affecting parents' initial confidence levels. Moreover, the PGD process was emotionally complex, with parents desiring varying amounts and types of support from different sources at different times. Parents reported others' attitudes towards them were similar or no different than before PGD. Parental regret regarding PGD was negligible. Results of this study will promote optimization of long-term care for FA families.

The Past, Present, and Future of Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) of oocytes and embryos is the earliest form of prenatal testing. PGT requires in vitro fertilization for embryo creation. In the past 25 years, the use of PGT has increased dramatically. The indications of PGT include identification of embryos harboring single-gene disorders, chromosomal structural abnormalities, chromosomal numeric abnormalities, and mitochondrial disorders; gender selection; and identifying unaffected, HLA-matched embryos to permit the creation of a savior sibling. PGT is not without risks, limitations, or ethical controversies. This review discusses the techniques and clinical applications of different forms of PGT and the debate surrounding its associated uncertainty and expanded use.

Clinical Considerations of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Monogenic Diseases

Purpose

The aim of this study was to explore factors contribute to the success of PGD cycles for monogenic diseases.

Methods

During a 3-year period (January 2009 to December 2012), 184 consecutive ICSI-PGD cycles for monogenic diseases reaching the ovum pick-up and fresh embryo-transfer stage performed at the Reproductive Medicine Center of The First Affiliated Hospital Of Sun Yat-sen University were evaluated.

Results

ICSI was performed on 2206 metaphase II oocytes, and normal fertilization and cleavage rates were 83.4% (1840/2206) and 96.2% (1770/1840), respectively. In the present study, 60.5% (181/299) of day 3 good-quality embryos developed into good-quality embryos on day 4 after biopsy. Collectively, 42.9% clinical pregnancy rate (79/184) and 28.5% implantation rate (111/389) were presented. In the adjusted linear regression model, the only two significant factors affecting the number of genetically unaffected embryos were the number of biopsied embryos (coefficient: 0.390, 95%CI 0.317–0.463, P = 0.000) and basal FSH level (coefficient: 0.198, 95%CI 0.031–0.365, P = 0.021). In the adjusted binary logistic regression model, the only two significant factors affecting pregnancy outcome were the number of genetically available transferable embryos after PGD (adjusted OR 1.345, 95% CI 1.148–1.575, P = 0.000) and number of oocyte retrieved (adjusted OR 0.934, 95% CI 0.877–0.994, P = 0.031).

Conclusion

There should be at least four biopsied embryos to obtain at least one unaffected embryos in a PGD system for patients with single gene disorder and under the condition of basal FSH level smaller than 8.0mmol/L. Moreover, if only a low number (< 4) of biopsied embryos are available on day 3, the chance of unaffected embryos for transfer was small, with poor outcome.

ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XIII: cycles from January to December 2010 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2011

STUDY QUESTION

How do data in the 13th annual data collection (Data XIII) of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium compare with the cumulative data for collections I-XII?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The 13th retrospective collection represents valuable data on PGD/PGS cycles, pregnancies and children: the main trend observed is the decrease in the routine implementation of PGS.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Since 1999, the PGD Consortium has collected, analysed and published 12 data sets and an overview of the first 10 years of data collections.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Data were collected from each participating centre using a FileMaker Pro database (versions 5-11). Separate predesigned FileMaker Pro files were used for the cycles, pregnancies and baby records. The study documented cycles performed during the calendar year 2010 and follow-up of the pregnancies and babies born which resulted from these cycles (until October 2011).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Data were submitted by 62 centres (full PGD Consortium members). The submitted data were thoroughly analysed to identify incomplete data entries and corrections were requested from the participating centres. Records remaining with incomplete or inconsistent data were excluded from the calculations. Corrections, calculations and tables were made by expert co-authors.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

For data collection XIII, 62 centres reported data for 5780 cycles with oocyte retrieval (OR), along with details of the follow-up on 1503 pregnancies and 1152 babies born. A total of 1071 OR were reported for chromosomal abnormalities, 108 OR for sexing for X-linked diseases, 1574 OR for monogenic diseases, 2979 OR for preimplantation genetic screening and 48 OR for social sexing.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The findings apply to the 62 participating centres and may not represent worldwide trends in PGD.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The annual data collections provide an important resource for data mining and for following trends in PGD practice.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

None.

ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XII: cycles from January to December 2009 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2010

STUDY QUESTION

How do data in the 12th annual data collection (Data XII) of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) Consortium compare with the cumulative data for collections I-XI?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Since the beginning of the data collections, there has been a steady increase in the number of cycles, pregnancies and babies reported annually.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The PGD Consortium has collected, analysed and published 11 previous data sets since 1997.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Data were collected from each participating centre using a pre-designed FileMaker Pro database (versions 5-10). Separate FileMaker Pro files were used for the cycles, pregnancies and baby records. The study documented cycles performed during the calendar year 2009 and follow-up of the pregnancies and babies born which resulted from these cycles (until October 2010).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Data were submitted by 60 centres (full PGD Consortium members), and the blank files were distributed to each PGD Consortium member centre at the end of 2008. The submitted data were thoroughly analysed to identify incomplete data entries and corrections were requested from the participating centres. Records remaining with incomplete data were excluded from the calculations. Corrections, tables and calculations were made by expert co-authors.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

For data collection XII, 60 centres reported data for 6160 cycles with oocyte retrieval (OR), along with details of the follow-up on 1607 pregnancies and 1238 babies born. A total of 870 OR were reported for chromosomal abnormalities, 113 OR for sexing for X-linked diseases, 1597 OR for monogenic diseases, 3551 OR for preimplantation genetic screening and 29 OR for social sexing.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

These data cannot include every PGD cycle performed annually, and only indicate the trends in PGD worldwide.

WIDER IMPLICATION OF THE FINDINGS

The annual data collections provide an extremely valuable resource for data mining and for following trends in PGD practice.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

None.

PGD for cystic fibrosis patients and couples at risk of an additional genetic disorder combined with 24-chromosome aneuploidy testing

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for inherited disorders is presently applied for more than 300 different conditions. The most frequent PGD indication is cystic fibrosis (CF), the largest series of which is reviewed here, totalling 404 PGD cycles. This involved testing for 52 different CFTR mutations with almost half of the cases (195/404 cycles) performed for ΔF508 mutation, one-quarter (103/404 cycles) for six other frequent mutations and only a few for the remaining 45 CFTR mutations. There were 44 PGD cycles performed for 25 CF-affected homozygous or double-heterozygous CF patients (18 male and seven female partners), which involved testing simultaneously for three mutations, resulting in birth of 13 healthy CF-free children and no misdiagnosis. PGD was also performed for six couples at a combined risk of producing offspring with CF and another genetic disorder. Concomitant testing for CFTR and other mutations resulted in birth of six healthy children, free of both CF and another genetic disorder in all but one cycle. A total of 96 PGD cycles for CF were performed with simultaneous aneuploidy testing, including microarray-based 24-chromosome analysis, as a comprehensive PGD for two or more conditions in the same biopsy material.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve pregnancy outcomes in subfertility

Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis provides prenatal genetic diagnosis before implantation, thus allowing detection of chromosomal abnormalities and their exclusion from embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technologies. Polar body, blastomere or trophectoderm can each be used to obtain requisite genetic or embryonic DNA. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for excluding unbalanced translocations is well accepted, and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis aneuploidy testing to avoid repeated pregnancy losses in couples having recurrent aneuploidy is efficacious in reducing miscarriages. Controversy remains about whether pre-implantation genetic diagnosis aneuploidy testing improves take home pregnancy rates, for which reason adherence to specific indications is recommended while the issue is being adjudicated. Current recommendations are for obligatory 24 chromosome testing, most readily using array comparative genome hybridisation.

ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XI: cycles from January to December 2008 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2009

The 11th report of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Consortium is presented, documenting cycles collected for the calendar year 2008 and follow-up of the pregnancies and babies born until October 2009 which resulted from these cycles. Since the beginning of the data collections, there has been a steady increase in the number of cycles, pregnancies and babies reported annually. For data collection XI, 53 centres have participated, reporting on 5641 cycles to oocyte retrieval (OR), along with details of the follow-up on 1418 pregnancies and 1169 babies born. A total of 774 OR were reported for chromosomal abnormalities, 96 OR for sexing for X-linked diseases, 1363 OR for monogenic diseases, 3401 OR for preimplantation genetic screening and 5 OR for social sexing. Data XI is compared with the cumulative data for data collections I-X.

DNA methylation differences at growth related genes correlate with birth weight: a molecular signature linked to developmental origins of adult disease?

Background

Infant birth weight is a complex quantitative trait associated with both neonatal and long-term health outcomes. Numerous studies have been published in which candidate genes (IGF1, IGF2, IGF2R, IGF binding proteins, PHLDA2 and PLAGL1) have been associated with birth weight, but these studies are difficult to reproduce in man and large cohort studies are needed due to the large inter individual variance in transcription levels. Also, very little of the trait variance is explained. We decided to identify additional candidates without regard for what is known about the genes. We hypothesize that DNA methylation differences between individuals can serve as markers of gene "expression potential" at growth related genes throughout development and that these differences may correlate with birth weight better than single time point measures of gene expression.

Methods

We performed DNA methylation and transcript profiling on cord blood and placenta from newborns. We then used novel computational approaches to identify genes correlated with birth weight.

Results

We identified 23 genes whose methylation levels explain 70-87% of the variance in birth weight. Six of these (ANGPT4, APOE, CDK2, GRB10, OSBPL5 and REG1B) are associated with growth phenotypes in human or mouse models. Gene expression profiling explained a much smaller fraction of variance in birth weight than did DNA methylation. We further show that two genes, the transcriptional repressor MSX1 and the growth factor receptor adaptor protein GRB10, are correlated with transcriptional control of at least seven genes reported to be involved in fetal or placental growth, suggesting that we have identified important networks in growth control. GRB10 methylation is also correlated with genes involved in reactive oxygen species signaling, stress signaling and oxygen sensing and more recent data implicate GRB10 in insulin signaling.

Conclusions

Single time point measurements of gene expression may reflect many factors unrelated to birth weight, while inter-individual differences in DNA methylation may represent a "molecular fossil record" of differences in birth weight-related gene expression. Finding these "unexpected" pathways may tell us something about the long-term association between low birth weight and adult disease, as well as which genes may be susceptible to environmental effects. These findings increase our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in human development and disease progression.

The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection

BACKGROUND

Since it was established in 1997, the ESHRE PGD Consortium has been collecting data from international preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) centres. Ten papers have been published, including data from January 1997 to December 2007.

METHODS

The data collection originally used a hard-copy format, then an excel database and finally a FileMaker Pro database. The indications are divided into five categories: PGD for chromosome abnormalities, sexing for X-linked disease, PGD for single gene defects, preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) and PGD for social sexing. The main end-points are pregnancy outcome and follow-up of deliveries.

RESULTS

In data collection I, 16 centres contributed data, which increased to 57 centres by data X (average of 39 centres per data collection). These centres contributed data on over 27 000 cycles that reached oocyte retrieval. Of these cycles, 61% were for aneuploidy screening, 17% for single gene disorders, 16% for chromosomal abnormalities, 4% for sexing of X-linked disease and 2% for social sexing. Cumulatively, 5187 clinical pregnancies gave rise to 4140 deliveries and 5135 newborns (singletons: 3182, twins: 921, triplets: 37).

CONCLUSIONS

In this paper, we present an overview of the first 10 years of PGD data, highlighting trends. These include the introduction of laser-assisted biopsy, an increase in polar body and trophectoderm biopsy, new strategies, methodologies and technologies for diagnosis, including recently arrays, and the more frequent use of freezing biopsied embryos. The Consortium data reports represent a valuable resource for information about the practice of PGD.

Outcomes of ovarian stimulation in a two-day oocyte collection week with PGD cycles compared to a five-day oocyte collection week with conventional IVF/ICSI cycles

We assessed the outcomes of ovarian stimulation in a two-day egg collection (EC) week with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) cycles (N = 307) compared to a five-day EC week with conventional in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles (N = 2,417). The mean (SD) age of women undergoing PGD was 34 (3.97) and 35 (3.85) for IVF/ICSI (P < 0.001), the number of oocytes collected was 13 (7.37) and 11 (7.02), (P < 0.001), while the mean (SD) number of fertilized oocytes was 8 (5.09) and 6 (4.58), respectively (P < 0.001). The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer (ET) was 37% with PGD and 38% with IVF/ICSI (P = 0.49), while the implantation rate was 0.35 and 0.30, respectively (P = 0.05). After adjusting for age and confounding variables including the number of oocytes collected and fertilized normally, the mode of treatment (PGD or IVF/ICSI) had no effect on clinical pregnancy (P = 0.48). In conclusion, scheduling of PGD cycles to a two-day EC week did not compromise the outcomes of ovarian stimulation when compared to a five-day EC week with conventional IVF/ICSI cycles. This can allow the provision of a more patient friendly service, increase the flexibility of satellite PGD services, and facilitate cycle programming with the genetics team providing PGD.

Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Despite an ongoing debate over its efficacy, preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is increasingly being used to detect numerical chromosomal abnormalities in embryos to improve implantation rates after IVF. The main indications for the use of PGS in IVF treatments include advanced maternal age, repeated implantation failure, and recurrent pregnancy loss. The success of PGS is highly dependent on technical competence, embryo culture quality, and the presence of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos. Today, cleavage stage biopsy is the most commonly used method for screening preimplantation embryos for aneuploidy. However, blastocyst biopsy is rapidly becoming the more preferred method due to a decreased likelihood of mosaicism and an increase in the amount of DNA available for testing. Instead of using 9 to 12 chromosome FISH, a 24 chromosome detection by aCGH or SNP microarray will be used. Thus, it is advised that before attempting to perform PGS and expecting any benefit, extended embryo culture towards day 5/6 should be established and proven and the clinical staff should demonstrate competence with routine competency assessments. A properly designed randomized control trial is needed to test the potential benefits of these new developments.

Cri du chat syndrome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis for reciprocal translocation

OBJECTIVE

To report the first case of cri du chat syndrome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for reciprocal translocation.

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING

In vitro fertilization center in a university affiliated hospital.

PATIENT(S)

A woman carrying a t(11;22)(q23;q11.2) translocation.

INTERVENTION(S)

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis was performed, and the woman became pregnant.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Successful PGD for reciprocal translocation and diagnosis of Cri du chat syndrome for the baby.

RESULT(S)

A male baby was born at 36 weeks' gestation. However, the baby presented with a high-pitched, cat-like cry. Cytogenetic study revealed a rare case of cri du chat syndrome associated with t(11;22)(q23;q11.2) translocation.

CONCLUSION(S)

Chromosomal abnormalities, including the rare cru du chat syndrome, may occur after fluorescent in situ hybridization-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) has increasingly been used in the past decade. Here we present a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs on the effect of PGS on the probability of live birth after IVF.

METHODS

PubMed and trial registers were searched for RCTs on PGS. Trials were assessed following predetermined quality criteria. The primary outcome was live birth rate per woman, secondary outcomes were ongoing pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate and pregnancy outcome.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs comparing IVF with and without PGS were included in our meta-analysis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was used in all trials and cleavage stage biopsy was used in all but one trial. PGS significantly lowered live birth rate after IVF for women of advanced maternal age (risk difference: -0.08; 95% confidence interval: -0. 13 to -0.03). For a live birth rate of 26% after IVF without PGS, the rate would be between 13 and 23% using PGS. Trials where PGS was offered to women with a good prognosis and to women with repeated implantation failure suggested similar outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence of a beneficial effect of PGS as currently applied on the live birth rate after IVF. On the contrary, for women of advanced maternal age PGS significantly lowers the live birth rate. Technical drawbacks and chromosomal mosaicism underlie this inefficacy of PGS. New approaches in the application of PGS should be evaluated carefully before their introduction into clinical practice.

First systematic experience of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for de-novo mutations

Standard preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) cannot be applied for de-novo mutations (DNM), because neither origin nor relevant haplotypes are available for testing in single cells. PGD strategies were developed for 80 families with 38 genetic disorders, determined by 33 dominant, three recessive and two X-linked DNM. All three recessive mutations were of paternal origin, while of 93 dominant mutations, 40 were paternal, 46 maternal and seven detected in affected children. The development of specific PGD strategy for each couple involved DNA analysis of the parents and affected children prior to PGD, including a mutation verification, polymorphic marker evaluation, whole and single sperm testing to establish the normal and mutant haplotypes and PGD by polar body analysis and/or embryo biopsy. Overall, 151 PGD cycles were performed for 80 families, for which a specific PGD design has been established. The application of these protocols resulted in pre-selection and transfer of 219 (1.72 per cycle) DNM-free embryos in 127 (84.1%) PGD cycles, yielding 63 (49.6%) unaffected pregnancies and birth of 59 (46.5%) healthy children, confirmed to be free of DNM. The data show feasibility of PGD for DNM, which may routinely be performed with accuracy of over 99%, using the established PGD strategy.

Pregnancy outcome after preimplantation genetic screening or natural conception in couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review of the best available evidence

The objective of this systematic review was to assess live birth rates and miscarriage rates after preimplantation genetic screening or natural conception for unexplained recurrent miscarriage. There were no randomized controlled trials or comparative studies found on this topic. Until data from randomized controlled trials become available, this review summarizes the best available evidence of the efficacy of preimplantation genetic screening vs. natural conception.

Meiotic recombination errors, the origin of sperm aneuploidy and clinical recommendations

Since the early 1990s male infertility has successfully been treated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), nevertheless concerns have been raised regarding the genetic risk of ICSI. Chromosome aneuploidy (the presence of extra or missing chromosomes) is the leading cause of pregnancy loss and mental retardation in humans. While the majority of chromosome aneuploidies are maternal in origin, the paternal contribution to aneuploidy is clinically relevant particularly for the sex chromosomes. Given that it is difficult to study female gametes investigations are predominantly conducted in male meiotic recombination and sperm aneuploidy. Research suggests that infertile men have increased levels of sperm aneuploidy and that this is likely due to increased errors in meiotic recombination and chromosome synapsis within these individuals. It is perhaps counterintuitive but there appears to be no selection against chromosomally aneuploid sperm at fertilization. In fact the frequency of aneuploidy in sperm appears to be mirrored in conceptions. Given this information this review will cover our current understanding of errors in meiotic recombination and chromosome synapsis and how these may contribute to increased sperm aneuploidy. Frequencies of sperm aneuploidy in infertile men and individuals with constitutional karyotypic abnormalities are reviewed, and based on these findings, indications for clinical testing of sperm aneuploidy are discussed. In addition, the application of single nucleotide arrays for the analysis of meiotic recombination and identification of parental origin of aneuploidy are considered.

ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for organization of a PGD centre for PGD/preimplantation genetic screening

In 2005, the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium published a set of Guidelines for Best Practice PGD to give information, support and guidance to potential, existing and fledgling PGD programmes. Subsequent years have seen the introduction of new technologies as well as the evolution of current techniques. Additionally, in light of recent advice from ESHRE on how practice guidelines should be written/formulated, the Consortium believed it was timely to update the PGD guidelines. Rather than one document that covers all of PGD, the new guidelines are separated into four documents, including one relating to organization of the PGD centre and three relating to the methods used: DNA amplification, fluorescence in situ hybridization and biopsy/embryology. Here, we have updated the sections on organization of the PGD centre. One area that has continued to expand is Transport PGD, in which patients are treated at one IVF centre, whereas their gametes/embryos are tested elsewhere, at an independent PGD centre. Transport PGD/preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) has a unique set of challenges with respect to the nature of the sample and the rapid turn-around time required. PGS is currently controversial. Opinions of laboratory specialists and clinicians interested in PGD and PGS have been taken into account here. Current evidence suggests that PGS at cleavage stages is ineffective, but whether PGS at the blastocyst stage or on polar bodies might show improved delivery rates is still unclear. Thus, in this revision, PGS has been included. This document should assist everyone interested in PGD/PGS in developing the best laboratory and clinical practice possible.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis at 20 years

First reported in 1990, PGD has evolved into a complementary form of prenatal diagnosis offering novel indications. DNA for PGD can be recovered with equal safety and facility from polar bodies I and II, blastomere (8 cell embryo) and trophectoderm (5-6 day blastocyst). Diagnostic accuracy is very high (>99%) for both chromosomal abnormalities and single gene disorders. Traditional application of FISH with chromosome specific probes for detecting aneuploidy and translocations may be replaced or complemented by array comparative genome hybridization (array CGH); biopsied embryos can now be cryopreserved (vitrification) while analysis proceeds in orderly fashion. PGD has been accomplished for over 200 different single gene disorders. Novel indications for PGD not readily applicable by traditional prenatal genetic diagnosis include avoiding clinical pregnancy termination, performing preconceptional diagnosis (polar body I), obtaining prenatal diagnosis without disclosure of prenatal genotype (nondisclosure), diagnosing adult-onset disorders particularly cancer, and identifying HLA compatible embryos suitable for recovering umbilical cord blood stem cells.

Conceptualizing couples' decision making in PGD: emerging cognitive, emotional, and moral dimensions

OBJECTIVE

To illuminate and synthesize what is known about the underlying decision making processes surrounding couples' preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) use or disuse and to formulate an initial conceptual framework that can guide future research and practice.

METHODS

This systematic review targeted empirical studies published in English from 1990 to 2008 that examined the decision making process of couples or individual partners that had used, were eligible for, or had contemplated PGD. Sixteen studies met the eligibility requirements. To provide a more comprehensive review, empirical studies that examined healthcare professionals' perceptions of couples' decision making surrounding PGD use and key publications from a variety of disciplines supplemented the analysis.

RESULTS

The conceptual framework formulated from the review demonstrates that couples' PGD decision making is composed of three iterative and dynamic dimensions: cognitive appraisals, emotional responses, and moral judgments.

CONCLUSION

Couples think critically about uncertain and probabilistic information, grapple with conflicting emotions, and incorporate moral perspectives into their decision making about whether or not to use PGD.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The quality of care and decisional support for couples who are contemplating PGD use can be improved by incorporating focused questions and discussion from each of the dimensions into counseling sessions.

PGD for X-linked and gender-dependent disorders using a robust, flexible single-tube PCR protocol

X-linked genetic diseases include a wide range of disorders such as the dystrophinopathies. Additionally in some rare genetic diseases, severity of expression is gender dependent. Prevention of such disorders usually involves prenatal diagnosis and termination of affected pregnancies, while preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) represents a specialized alternative that avoids pregnancy termination. To preclude the rejection of unaffected male embryos that cannot be differentiated from those affected when using fluorescence in-situ hybridization, a flexible protocol based on multiplex fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was standardized and validated for gender determination in single cells, which can potentially incorporate any disease-specific locus. The final panel of nine loci included four loci on the Y chromosome, two on the X chromosome plus up to three microsatellite markers to either support the gender diagnosis or to further monitor extraneous contamination. The protocol, standardized on single lymphocytes, established a PCR efficiency of >93% for all loci with maximum allele dropout rates of 4%. Microsatellite analysis excluded external contamination and confirmed biallelic inheritance. Proof of principle for the simplicity and flexibility of the assay was demonstrated through its application to clinical PGD cycles for lipoid congenital adrenal hyperplasia, which presents a more severe clinical course in males, and Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection X: cycles from January to December 2007 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2008

The 10th report of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium is presented, documenting cycles collected for the calendar year 2007 and follow-up of the pregnancies and babies born until October 2008 which resulted from these cycles. Since the beginning of the data collections there has been a steady increase in the number of cycles, pregnancies and babies reported annually. For data collection X, 57 centres participated, reporting on 5887 cycles to oocyte retrieval (OR), along with details of the follow-up on 1516 pregnancies and 1206 babies born. A total of 729 OR were reported for chromosomal abnormalities, 110 OR for sexing for X-linked diseases, 1203 OR for monogenic diseases, 3753 OR for preimplantation genetic screening and 92 OR for social sexing. Data X is compared with the cumulative data for data collections I-IX.

Preimplantation genetic testing: indications and controversies

In the last two decades, the use of preimplantation genetic testing has increased dramatically. This testing is used for identifying singlegene disorders, chromosomal abnormalities, mitochondrial disorders, gender selection in non-mendelian disorders with unequal gender distribution, aneuploidy screening, and other preconceptually identified genetic abnormalities in prospective parents. Genetic testing strategies and diagnostic accuracy continues to improve, but not without risks or controversies. In this review the authors discuss the techniques and clinical application of preimplantation genetic diagnosis, and the debate surrounding its associated uncertainty and expanded use.

Development and successful clinical application of preimplantation genetic haplotyping for Herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa

BACKGROUND

Herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa (HJEB) is a severe, life-threatening, autosomal recessive blistering skin disease for which no cure is currently available. Prenatal diagnosis for couples at risk is feasible through fetal skin biopsy or analysis of DNA extracted from chorionic villi, but these methods can be applied only after pregnancy has been established. An alternative approach, which involves the analysis of single cells from embryos prior to establishment of pregnancy, is preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Until now, its clinical uptake has been hindered by lengthy delays in establishing mutation-specific protocols, and by the small amount of template DNA that can be obtained from a single cell. A new method that addresses these problems, preimplantation genetic haplotyping (PGH), relies on whole genome amplification followed by haplotyping of multiple polymorphic markers using standard DNA-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays.

OBJECTIVES

To design and validate a generic PGH assay for HJEB and to transfer this into clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We established a multiplex PCR-based PGH assay involving 16 markers within and flanking the LAMB3 gene (the most frequently mutated gene in HJEB). The assay was then validated in 10 families with at least one previously affected offspring. After licensing by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), the new test was used for PGD in a couple at risk of HJEB.

RESULTS

The chromosome 1 LAMB3 markers within the assay were shown to be of sufficient heterogeneity to have widespread application for preimplantation testing of HJEB. In one couple that were heterozygous carriers of nonsense mutations in LAMB3, we used the new assay to identify unaffected embryos in a series of PGD cycles. Pregnancy was established in the third PGD cycle and a healthy, unaffected child was born. DNA analysis of cord blood confirmed the predicted single-cell mutation status of wild-type LAMB3 alleles.

CONCLUSIONS

PGH represents a major step forward in widening the scope and availability of preimplantation testing for serious mapped single-gene disorders. We have established a generic test that is suitable for the majority of couples at risk of HJEB.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Couples at risk for having an affected child with homozygous thalassemia or other serious hemoglobin disorder have various options for prevention. The most used in some countries has been prenatal diagnosis with a choice of termination of pregnancy. A more recent addition is preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). In this article, this method is described and reviewed.

Neurological condition of infants born after in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening

Aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) on neurodevelopmental outcome in children. We conducted a prospective follow-up study of children born to women randomly assigned to in vitro fertilization with or without PGS. Primary outcome was adverse neurologic outcome at 18 mo; secondary outcomes were types of minor neurologic dysfunction (MND), neurologic outcome before 18 mo, neonatal intensive care admission, and congenital malformations. Twenty women in the PGS group participated with 25 children and 26 women in the control group participated with 31 children. Five PGS pregnancies (25%) and four control pregnancies (15%) resulted in birth of at least one child with an adverse neurologic outcome (adjusted odds ratio: 2.3 [0.4-12.0]). Dysfunction in fine motor abilities and posture and muscle tone dysregulation tended to be present more frequently after PGS. Neurologic outcome before 18 mo, neonatal intensive care admission, and prevalence of congenital malformations were similar in study and control pregnancies. Nevertheless, at child level, rates of adverse outcome were higher after PGS. In conclusion, outcome in pregnancies after in vitro fertilization (IVF) with and without PGS was similar. The small sample size precludes the conclusion that PGS is not associated with less favorable neurologic outcome. Safety of new assisted reproductive techniques should be evaluated before large-scale implementation.

The single cell as a tool for genetic testing: credibility, precision, implication

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of amplicons size and cell type on allele dropout and amplification failures in single-cell based molecular diagnosis.

METHODS

730 single lymphocytes and amniotic cells were collected from known heterozygotes individuals to one of the common Ashkenazi Jewish mutations: 1278+TATC and IVS12+1G>C which cause Tay Sachs Disease, IVS20+6T and 854A>C which underlie Familial Dysautonomia and Canavan Disease. DNA was extracted and analyzed by our routine methods.

RESULTS

Reduced rates of allele dropout and amplification failure were found when smaller amplification product were designed and in amniotic cultured cells compared to peripheral lymphocytes. Cultured lymphocytes, induced to divide, demonstrated significantly less allele dropout than non induced lymphocytes suggesting the role of division potential on amplification efficiency.

CONCLUSION

Single cell based diagnosis should be designed for each mutation. Minimal sized amplicons and cell having division potential should be preferred, as well as sensitive techniques to detect preferential amplification.

Preimplantation genetic haplotyping: 127 diagnostic cycles demonstrating a robust, efficient alternative to direct mutation testing on single cells

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis using whole genome amplification and a haplotyping approach (PGH) was first described in 2006 and suggested as an efficient alternative to single-cell PCR for monogenic disorders. DNA from single cells was amplified using multiple displacement amplification; the resulting products were then tested using disease-specific PCR multiplexes applied under standard laboratory conditions to determine the haplotypes in the embryo. This study reports on a total of 127 completed biopsy cycles for 101 couples at risk of: autosomal recessive disease (71 cycles, 53 couples including one germ-line mosaic carrier), autosomal dominant disease (31 cycles, 26 couples including one germ-line mosaic carrier), X-linked recessive disease (18 cycles, 16 couples including one germ-line mosaic carrier), X-linked dominant disease (six cycles, five couples) and a double inheritance of both autosomal and X-linked recessive diseases (one cycle, one couple). Of these, 107 cycles reached embryo transfer. Overall success rates were: fetal heart beat-positive pregnancies (FHB+)/biopsy cycle=28%; FHB+/embryo transfer=34%; FHB+/couple=36%; 26 babies born, 13 ongoing pregnancies. These data demonstrate that PGH provides a robust, efficient and successful alternative to single-cell PCR for monogenic diseases.

Quantitative decision-making in preimplantation genetic (aneuploidy) screening (PGS)

PURPOSE

To analyze using hypergeometric probability statistics the impact of performing preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) on a cohort of day 3 cleavage stage embryos.

METHODS

Statistical mathematical modeling.

RESULTS

We find the benefit of performing PGS is highly dependent on the number of day 3 embryos available for biopsy. Additional hidden variables that determine the outcome of PGS are the rates of aneuploidy and mosaicism, and the probability of a chromosomally mosaic embryo to test "normal". If PGS is performed, our analysis shows that many combinations of the number of biopsiable embryos, and the rates of aneuploidy and mosaicism results in a marginal benefit from the intervention. Other combinations are detrimental if PGS is actually undertaken. Finally, increases in PGS error rates lead to a rapid loss in the ability of PGS to provide useful discriminatory information.

CONCLUSION

We set out the statistical framework to determine the limits of PGS when a specific number of day 3 preimplantation embryos are available for biopsy. In general, PGS cannot be recommended a priori for a specific clinical situation due to the statistical uncertainties associated with the different hidden variable quantitative parameters considered important to the clinical outcome.

Polar body biopsy in the diagnosis of monogenic diseases: the birth of three healthy children

BACKGROUND

For prospective parents at risk of transmitting a monogenic disease, polar body analysis is an option for pre-conception genetic diagnosis. In Germany, polar body analysis is currently performed in only two centers (Lübeck and Regensburg).

METHODS

The authors present a clinical series of 9 couples at risk for the transmission of a monogenic disease who underwent in vitro fertilization with polar body analysis.

RESULTS

Nine couples have undergone in vitro fertilization with polar body analysis at the center in Lübeck since 2004. Three healthy children were born after polar body analysis for mucopolysaccharidosis type I, incontinentia pigmenti, and cystic fibrosis. The decision to undergo in vitro fertilization with polar body analysis is not easy for prospective parents to take, even though it often follows years of emotional suffering. Treatment with the methods of reproductive medicine in general, and with polar body analysis in particular, can cause considerable physical and emotional stress.

CONCLUSIONS

For prospective parents in Germany at risk of transmitting a monogenic disease, polar body-based preimplantation diagnosis is an alternative to prenatal diagnosis and possible termination of pregnancy. The live birth rate per treatment cycle in this clinical series was 30%, which can be considered satisfactory. Nonetheless, most of the couples who did not achieve pregnancy after a first treatment cycle dropped out of treatment prematurely and did not go on to a second cycle.

Aberrant behavior of mouse embryo development after blastomere biopsy as observed through time-lapse cinematography

OBJECTIVE

To analyze whether blastomere biopsy affects early embryonal growth as observed through time-lapse cinematography.

DESIGN

Comparative prospective study between embryos in which a blastomere was removed and embryos in which a blastomere was not removed.

SETTING

An experimental laboratory of the university.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

We calculated the time between blastocele formation and the end of hatching, the time between the start and end of hatching, the number of contractions and expansions between blastocyst formation and the end of hatching, and the maximum diameter of the expanded blastocyst.

RESULT(S)

In blastomere removal embryos, compaction began at the six-cell stage instead of at the eight-cell stage. We also found that hatching was delayed in these embryos as compared with matched controls. Moreover, the frequency of contraction and expansion movements after blastocyst formation was significantly higher in the blastomere removal group as compared with the control group. Finally, the maximum diameter of the expanded blastocyst just before hatching was not significantly different between both groups.

CONCLUSION(S)

These findings suggested that blastomere removal has an adverse effect on embryonic development around the time of hatching. Thus, future developments in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening should involve further consideration and caution in light of the influence of blastomere biopsy on embryonal growth.