Offering excess oocyte aspiration and vitrification to patients undergoing stimulated artificial insemination cycles can reduce the multiple pregnancy risk and accumulate oocytes for later use

Aspiration of excess follicles before intrauterine insemination in high response cycles

Purpose

To assess the outcome of excess follicle aspiration before intrauterine insemination (EFABI) in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles with 4-6 follicles ≥14 mm.

Methods

A retrospective case-control study with 1559 patients undergoing IUI (donor and husband's sperm), of whom 86 underwent EFABI. We studied also an historical series of 2213 patients before EFABI implementation. For 3.5 years, all women undergoing IUI developing 4-6 follicles ≥14 mm were offered EFABI on the day of hCG administration. Pregnancy rates (PRs), multiple PRs, and adverse effects were measured.

Results

EFABI was associated with a similar multiple PR (17.8% vs 17.5% in non-EFABI cases), with no triplets in EFABI patients. Live birth rates were significantly higher in EFABI cycles in IUI overall (25.5% vs 15.2%). When considered separately, the performance of EFABI resulted in significantly increased live birth rates in IUI-donor cycles (32.5% vs 18.5%), whereas the differences in IUI-husband cycles (19.5% vs 12.9%) did not reach statistical significance. The PR was 21.2% during the EFABI implementation period and 19.4% in the pre-EFABI period.

Conclusions

EFABI in cycles in which 4-6 follicles reach ≥14 mm is a simple option that reduces cycle cancellation rates, results in higher PRs than cycles with 1-3 follicles, and lowers the risk of multiple pregnancy.

Follicle stimulating hormone versus clomiphene citrate in intrauterine insemination for unexplained subfertility: a randomized controlled trial

STUDY QUESTION

Is FSH or clomiphene citrate (CC) the most effective stimulation regimen in terms of ongoing pregnancies in couples with unexplained subfertility undergoing IUI with adherence to strict cancellation criteria as a measure to reduce the number of multiple pregnancies?

SUMMARY ANSWER

In IUI with adherence to strict cancellation criteria, ovarian stimulation with FSH is not superior to CC in terms of the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate, and yields a similar, low multiple pregnancy rate.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN

FSH has been shown to result in higher pregnancy rates compared to CC, but at the cost of high multiple pregnancy rates. To reduce the risk of multiple pregnancy, new ovarian stimulation regimens have been suggested, these include strict cancellation criteria to limit the number of dominant follicles per cycle i.e. withholding insemination when more than three dominant follicles develop. With such a strategy, it is unclear whether the ovarian stimulation should be done with FSH or with CC.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

We performed an open-label multicenter randomized superiority controlled trial in the Netherlands (NTR 4057).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

We randomized couples diagnosed with unexplained subfertility and scheduled for a maximum of four cycles of IUI with ovarian stimulation with 75 IU FSH or 100 mg CC. Cycles were cancelled when more then three dominant follicles developed. The primary outcome was cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate. Multiple pregnancy was a secondary outcome. We analysed the data on intention to treat basis. We calculated relative risks and absolute risk difference with 95% CI.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Between July 2013 and March 2016, we allocated 369 women to ovarian stimulation with FSH and 369 women to ovarian stimulation with CC. A total of 113 women (31%) had an ongoing pregnancy following ovarian stimulation with FSH and 97 women (26%) had an ongoing pregnancy following ovarian stimulation with CC (RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.93-1.47, ARD = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.11). Five women (1.4%) had a multiple pregnancy following ovarian stimulation with FSH and eight women (2.2%) had a multiple pregnancy following ovarian stimulation with CC (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.21-1.89, ARD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.01).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

We were not able to blind this study due to the nature of the interventions. We consider it unlikely that this has introduced performance bias, since pregnancy outcomes are objective outcome measures.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

We revealed that adherence to strict cancellation criteria is a successful solution to reduce the number of multiple pregnancies in IUI. To decide whether ovarian stimulation with FSH or with CC should be the regimen of choice, costs and patients' preferences should be taken into account.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This trial received funding from the Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). Prof. Dr B.W.J. Mol is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548). B.W.M. reports consultancy for Merck, ObsEva and Guerbet. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Nederlands Trial Register NTR4057.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

1 July 2013.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT

The first patient was randomized at 27 August 2013.

Human recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) compared to urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction: a literature review and cost evaluation

BACKGROUND

Gonadotropins are protein hormones which are central to the complex endocrine system that regulates normal growth, sexual development, and reproductive function. There is still a lively debate on which type of gonadotropin medication should be used, either human menopausal gonadotropin or recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone. The objective of the study was to perform a systematic review of the recent literature to compare recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone to human menopausal gonadotropin with the aim to assess any differences in terms of efficacy and to provide a cost evaluation based on findings of this systematic review.

METHODS

The review was conducted selecting prospective, randomized, controlled trials comparing the two gonadotropin medications from a literature search of several databases. The outcome measure used to evaluate efficacy was the number of oocytes retrieved per cycle. In addition, a cost evaluation was performed based on retrieved efficacy data.

RESULTS

The number of oocytes retrieved appeared to be higher for human menopausal gonadotropin in only 2 studies while 10 out of 13 studies showed a higher mean number of oocytes retrieved per cycle for recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone. The results of the cost evaluation provided a similar cost per oocyte for both hormones.

CONCLUSIONS

Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone treatment resulted in a higher oocytes yield per cycle than human menopausal gonadotropin at similar cost per oocyte.