1
|
Lysons J, Imrie S, Jadva V, Golombok S. Families created via identity-release egg donation: disclosure and an exploration of donor threat in early childhood. Reprod Biomed Online 2023; 47:103235. [PMID: 37479604 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION What are mothers' disclosure intentions and practices from infancy to early childhood, and is perceived donor threat associated with disclosure in identity-release egg donation families when the children are aged 5 years? DESIGN This longitudinal study included 73 heterosexual-couple families with infants born following IVF-egg donation at phase one, and 61 families with 5-year-old children at phase two. At both phases, mothers were interviewed about their disclosure intentions and practices. At phase two, mothers were interviewed about their feelings about future donor-child contact. RESULTS Most mothers (75.3%) intended to disclose their use of egg donation to their children at phase one; half had begun to do so when their children were aged 5. Most remaining mothers planned to tell, although a minority were uncertain or planned not to disclose. When the child was aged 5, four mothers had started telling them that they could access their donor's identifying information at age 18, and most (84%) intended to do so in the future. Most couples agreed on a disclosure strategy at phase two. Most mothers perceived at least some threat from future donor-child contact, but this was unrelated to their disclosure practices. CONCLUSIONS Disclosure intentions in infancy are borne out in early childhood. Despite perceiving some threat from future donor-child contact, most mothers intended telling their child that they could access the donor's identifying information at age 18. Revisiting these families as the children grow older will be important to understand how the mothers' perceived donor threat may change over time, and how this is related to family processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Lysons
- Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK..
| | - Susan Imrie
- Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vasanti Jadva
- Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.; Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Susan Golombok
- Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rodino IS, Sanders KA. The influence of avoidant attachment and perceived support on disclosure about involvement in donor-assisted conception to family and friends. Hum Reprod 2023; 38:644-654. [PMID: 36737051 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Do the attachment-related dimensions Anxiety and Avoidance and perceived partner and social support in recipients and donors influence disclosure to others about their involvement in donor-assisted conception (DAC)? SUMMARY ANSWER A higher global score on attachment Avoidance was associated with greater non-disclosure about involvement in DAC by participants to relationship-specific others. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Within the context of DAC, the topic of disclosure has been investigated in terms of the 'if', 'when', and the 'how' to disclose about circumstances of conception. Less focus, however, has been directed to investigating psychological theoretical frameworks that influence disclosure decisions to others, i.e. to whom information is disclosed and to what extent details are transparently revealed about the donor programme. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The study was of a cross-sectional design and utilized a sample of 301 participants who were, or had been, involved in DAC, and were recruited across states of Australia. An online self-report questionnaire was completed between June 2014 and June 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS English speaking participants consisting of 209 female recipients and 92 donors (36 sperm; 48 egg; 8 embryo donors). Of the recipients, 104 had successfully conceived children via donated gametes (68 sperm, 23 eggs, 6 embryos, and 7 recipients where both gametes were donated from 2 donors to create the embryo). Participants anonymously completed an online questionnaire consisting of five sections: Demographics, Donor Conception and Disclosure Practices, the Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationships Structure, the Quality of Relationship Inventory, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Pearson correlations, independent samples t-tests, Chi-square, and ANOVA were used to explore the association between attachment Anxiety and Avoidance scores and disclosure about involvement in a DAC programme to significant others (i.e. parents, siblings, in-laws, and friends). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Compared to published community cohort data, participants reported lower global scores on attachment Anxiety and Avoidance and high levels of romantic partner and social network support, suggestive of secure relationships in the overall study sample. A higher score on attachment Avoidance was associated with less disclosure to significant others in their social network (i.e. parents, siblings, in-laws, and close friends), even in the presence of strong partner support (partial r = -0.248, P = 0.005). Higher scores on attachment Avoidance were inversely associated with level of perceived partner and social network support (all P < 0.05). Irrespective of attachment scores, more than 90% of all participants agreed that a child born of DAC should be told about mode of conception. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This study utilized a cross-sectional design precluding causal inferences between dimensions of insecure attachment and disclosure practices. Participants were required to self-report on the quality of their relationships with the potential for social desirability respondent bias. The study's self-selecting sample may limit generalization to participants who were dis-inclined to participate. Specifically, respondents who have an Avoidant attachment style, may have elected not to participate in the study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Given the increased use of biotechnology and digital facial recognition enabling self-discovery of the donor and the donor's extended family, non-disclosure about involvement in DAC may have consequences. An 'Avoidant' attachment style is important to assess as a potential risk factor for non-disclosure about involvement in DAC across different relational contexts (e.g. close family members and friends). Fertility counsellors should consider introducing a measure of attachment screening as a pre-emptive psychoeducational strategy during donor implications counselling. This information could be used to offer patients insight into concerns they have about DAC disclosures to key important relationships, providing a target of clinical intervention. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funds were sought for this work. None of the authors have any competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iolanda S Rodino
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Katherine A Sanders
- School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Siermann M, Visser M, Schrijvers A, Mochtar M, Gerrits T. 'Doing' kinship: heterosexual parents' experiences of non-genetic parenthood through donor conception. Reprod Biomed Online 2023; 46:210-218. [PMID: 36270931 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION How do Dutch heterosexual parents who achieved parenthood through donor conception navigate non-genetic parenthood and kinship? DESIGN A qualitative in-depth semi-structured interview study was performed between September 2018 and January 2019 with both partners of 13 Dutch heterosexual couples where the male partner suffered from infertility and who conceived a child with the help of a sperm donor. Interview questions were based on literature and clinical experiences of experts in the field of donor conception. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS All parents navigated non-genetic parenthood through 'doing' kinship: they negotiated the importance of nature versus nurture with regards to donor conception and non-genetic parenthood. Most parents perceived genetics as irrelevant for experiencing parenthood, bonding with their children and the preferred role of the donor in their future lives. Yet most of them found genetics relevant for generating similarities between the father and the child, and for wanting the same donor for all their children to ensure a full genetic relation among them. Additionally, based on the donor's genetic bond with the child, some men were anxious about the donor's role in the child's future life and the consequences for their position as a non-genetic father. A few women perceived genetics as relevant in terms of possible inherited illnesses from the donor. CONCLUSIONS Parents experienced several ambiguities regarding the role of genetics in donor conception and navigated 'doing' kinship in various ways. These aspects need to be taken into consideration during the counselling of prospective parents planning to conceive with donor conception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Siermann
- Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Present address: Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Marja Visser
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Schrijvers
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Mochtar
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Trudie Gerrits
- Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Widbom A, Sydsjö G, Lampic C. Psychological adjustment in disclosing and non-disclosing heterosexual-couple families following conception with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors. Reprod Biomed Online 2022; 45:1046-1053. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
5
|
Lampic C, Skoog Svanberg A, Gudmundsson J, Leandersson P, Solensten NG, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Wånggren K, Sydsjö G. National survey of donor-conceived individuals who requested information about their sperm donor-experiences from 17 years of identity releases in Sweden. Hum Reprod 2021; 37:510-521. [PMID: 34918081 PMCID: PMC8888998 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What characterizes the group of donor-conceived (DC) individuals who request information about their identity-release sperm donor in Sweden, and what are their experiences of disclosure, information receipt and donor contact? SUMMARY ANSWER Following three decades of identity-release donation in Sweden, few DC individuals have requested donor information with varying experiences of information receipt and donor contact. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY In 1985, Sweden was the first country worldwide to enact legislation that gave DC individuals the right to obtain identifying information about their donor. Since then, identity-release gamete donation has become available in many countries but there is limited knowledge about the individuals who request donor information. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A nation-wide cross-sectional survey study was performed at all seven University hospitals that provided donation treatment in Sweden during 1985-2002. During this period only donor insemination to heterosexual couples was permitted. Inclusion criteria were being 18 years of age or older, conceived with donor sperm and having requested information about the donor by December 2020. Recruitment was performed during 2016-2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A total of 60 individuals had requested information about their donor. Of these, 53 were approached and 40 individuals, representing 34 families, accepted study participation (75% response rate). Participants completed a postal survey with the WHO-10 well-being index and study-specific questions about experiences of disclosure, motivations for requesting donor information, receipt of information, as well as intentions and experiences of donor contact. Independent t-test and chi-square tests were used to compare ratings of participants with early and late disclosure. MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE Of ∼900 DC individuals who had reached adult age, a total of 60 (≈7%) had requested information about the donor. Most of the 40 study participants (78%) made their requests within 2 years after reaching 18 years of age, or following disclosure at later ages (up to 32 years). Several participants had adult DC siblings in the family who had not requested any donor information. All except five participants received identifying information about the donor from the clinic. However, some donors had died or lacked contact information. Among those participants who were able to contact their donor, 41% had done so at the time of the study, while a third of the participants were unsure about potential contact. Several had met the donor in person and a few were in regular contact. About half of the participants had been informed about their donor conception in adolescence or adulthood (age 12-32), and there were significant differences between participants based on age at disclosure. Compared to those with early disclosure, participants with late disclosure were significantly more likely to be dissatisfied with the timing of their disclosure (P = 0.021), to react with negative emotions (P < 0.001), and to subsequently contact the donor (P = 0.047). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The limited population available for inclusion resulted in a small sample size, despite a high response rate. In addition, men's lower participation rate must be taken into consideration when interpreting the results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The small number of individuals requesting information about their identity-release sperm donor is surprising. While not all DC individuals appear to be interested in donor information, it is reasonable to assume that some are unaware of their donor conception and thus unable to make informed decisions regarding their genetic origins. During the coming years, young women and men in many countries will become eligible to access identifying information about their donor. In order to meet the needs of these individuals, and to support positive outcomes for all involved parties, it is essential that adequate protocols and resources are developed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST Financial support from The Swedish Research Council. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Lampic
- Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.,Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Johannes Gudmundsson
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Reproductive Medicine Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Pia Leandersson
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Ann Thurin-Kjellberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Division of Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kjell Wånggren
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Gunilla Sydsjö
- Division of Children's and Women's Health, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kentenich H. Überlegungen zum Verbot der Eizellspende. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1373-2533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
7
|
Lampic C, Skoog Svanberg A, Sorjonen K, Sydsjö G. Understanding parents' intention to disclose the donor conception to their child by application of the theory of planned behaviour. Hum Reprod 2021; 36:395-404. [PMID: 33367734 PMCID: PMC7829471 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) contribute to understanding parents’ intention to share information about genetic origin with their donor-conceived child? SUMMARY ANSWER Parents’ intention to start disclosure was associated with beliefs that disclosure would have desired consequences and a desire to act in accordance to societal norms. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Despite a growing consensus on donor-conceived offspring’s right to information about their genetic origin, disclosure to the child remains a challenge for many parents, particularly heterosexual couples. TPB has successfully been applied to many health-related contexts and may contribute to increase understanding of parents’ decision-making about disclosing the genetic origin to their children. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A cross-sectional survey study of heterosexual couples with children aged 7–8 years following identity-release oocyte donation (OD, n = 83) or sperm donation (SD, n = 113). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The study is part of the prospective longitudinal Swedish Study on Gamete Donation. Couples accepted for oocyte or sperm donation treatment at seven fertility clinics were recruited in 2005–2008 and requested to complete four postal surveys in the following 10 years. The present study sample includes heterosexual couples with donor-conceived children aged 7–8 years. Data were collected with the study-specific TPB Disclosure Questionnaire and analysed with path analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE More than half of parents following OD or SD had already disclosed the donor conception to their child (OD 61%, SD 58%). Among parents who had not yet started the disclosure process, the belief that disclosure would have desired consequences (P < 0.05) and a desire to act in accordance to social norms favouring disclosure (P < 0.01) were positively associated with their intention to talk with their child about the donor conception during the upcoming year. In contrast, perceived confidence to talk with the child about his/her genetic origin was found to be negatively associated with the intention to start the disclosure process (P < 0.05). Type of treatment (OD/SD) and the existence or absence of a genetic link to the child were not directly associated with parents’ disclosure intentions. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The study was performed with heterosexual couples within the context of the Swedish legislation on identity-release donation, which limits the generalizability to other populations. Also, attrition may have introduced selection bias to the study findings. Future studies using the TPB Disclosure Questionnaire (TPB-DQ) with larger samples are needed to validate this measure. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Application of the theory of planned behaviour highlighted the importance of attitudes and social norms for parents’ intention to share information about the donor conception with their child. The present results add to the complexity of disclosure of donor conception, and may contribute to promote open communication and support family life following donor conception. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Financial support from the Swedish Research Council. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Lampic
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Agneta Skoog Svanberg
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Kimmo Sorjonen
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gunilla Sydsjö
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Imrie S, Jadva V, Golombok S. "Making the child mine": Mothers' thoughts and feelings about the mother-infant relationship in egg donation families. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY : JFP : JOURNAL OF THE DIVISION OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (DIVISION 43) 2020; 34:469-479. [PMID: 31944802 PMCID: PMC7192012 DOI: 10.1037/fam0000619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The number of families being created through fertility treatment with donor eggs is increasing yearly. Women who conceive in this way share a gestational but not genetic relationship with their child, yet there is limited understanding of how mothers experience the mother-child relationship during its formative period, infancy. This study explored heterosexual mothers' thoughts and feelings about the mother-infant relationship in families created through egg donation. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a sample of 85 women who had conceived following egg donation treatment at U.K. fertility clinics. Mothers had at least 1 infant (6-18 months) and were living with the child's father. Interview data were analyzed according to the principles of thematic analysis. The results showed that egg donation mothers used a range of strategies across the transition to parenthood that enabled them to establish their identity as the child's mother and facilitated the process of helping them feel that the baby was their own. This process was individual to each woman, with the absent genetic connection varying in significance between mothers. The strategies employed enabled most mothers to adjust successfully to parenthood and manage any ambivalence and uncertainties associated with nongenetic parenthood. Most mothers felt secure and confident in their position as the child's mother by the end of the first year. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen M, Rueter MA, Anderson KN, Connor JJ. Conversation Orientation Moderates the Relationship between Information Sharing of Medically Assisted Reproduction and Child Adjustment. FAMILY PROCESS 2020; 59:229-243. [PMID: 30536373 DOI: 10.1111/famp.12415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Parents who experienced infertility have increasingly used medically assisted reproduction (MAR) to add children to their families over the past few decades. These parents will need to decide if they will tell their children about being conceived using MAR. Although MAR information sharing operates within family contexts, little is known about the role of conversation orientation-one family contextual factor-in child outcomes associated with MAR information sharing in middle childhood. Derived from the Family Communication Patterns Theory, this study proposes that conversation orientation moderates the associations between MAR information sharing and children's psychosocial adjustment. This proposal was tested using a sample of 81 6- to 12-year-old MAR-conceived children from 55 families and a structured observational measure of conversation orientation. Multiple regression analyses showed that MAR information sharing interacted with conversation orientation to influence children's behavioral and attention problems but not emotional problems. In families with high conversation orientation, MAR information sharing was not significantly associated with children's behavioral and attention problems. In families with low conversation orientation, MAR information sharing was significantly associated with an increase in children's behavioral and attention problems. Results of this exploratory study demonstrate the potential significance of general communication orientation in understanding child outcomes of MAR information sharing and highlight the needed family context nuances in MAR research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muzi Chen
- Department of Family Social Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN
| | - Martha A Rueter
- Department of Family Social Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN
| | - Kayla N Anderson
- Department of Family Social Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN
| | - Jennifer J Connor
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pasch LA. New realities for the practice of egg donation: a family-building perspective. Fertil Steril 2019; 110:1194-1202. [PMID: 30503105 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2018] [Revised: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
The practice of egg donation in the United States has been based on assumptions about secrecy, anonymity, and contact among the parties that require reexamination. This article argues for the need to acknowledge that secrecy and anonymity are no longer viable assumptions and that all parties may have a strong interest in contact and connection. A shift in the narrative for the practice of egg donation from a purely medical perspective to a broader family-building perspective is described. Significant practice changes to accommodate the new realities, rooted in a family-building perspective, are outlined in the arenas of medical record retention, informed consent, recipient and donor preparation and counseling, facilitation of contact among the parties, and outreach to other medical professionals, with the goal of promoting not only healthy pregnancy, but also long-term positive family functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauri A Pasch
- Departments of Psychiatry and Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, University of California, San Francisco, California.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schrijvers A, Bos H, van Rooij F, Gerrits T, van der Veen F, Mochtar M, Visser M. Being a donor-child: wishes for parental support, peer support and counseling. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 40:29-37. [PMID: 29110558 DOI: 10.1080/0167482x.2017.1396313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed at exploring the wishes of Dutch donor-conceived offspring for parental support, peer support and counseling and sought to contribute to the improvement of health care for all parties involved with assisted reproductive technologies. METHODS We held semi-structured in-depth interviews with 24 donor-conceived offspring (Mage = 26.9, range 17-41) born within father-mother, two-mother and single mother families. The majority of the donor offspring was conceived with semen of anonymous donors. All offspring were recruited by network organizations and snowball sampling. The interviews were fully transcribed and analyzed using the constant comparative method. RESULTS Donor-conceived offspring wished that their parents had talked openly about donor conception and had missed parental support. They wished that their parents would have received counseling before donor sperm treatment on how to talk with their children about donor conception in several stages of life. They valued the availability of peer contact to exchange stories with other donor-conceived offspring and would have liked assistance in getting access to trustworthy information about characteristics and identifying information of their donor. Donor-conceived offspring wished to know where to find specialist counseling when needed. CONCLUSIONS Peer support and counseling by professionals for donor-conceived offspring should be available for those who need it. The findings also support professional counseling for intended parents before treatment to improve parental support for donor-children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Schrijvers
- a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre for Reproductive Medicine , Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Henny Bos
- b Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences , Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Floor van Rooij
- b Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences , Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Trudie Gerrits
- c Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences , Sociology and Anthropology, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Fulco van der Veen
- a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre for Reproductive Medicine , Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Monique Mochtar
- a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre for Reproductive Medicine , Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Marja Visser
- a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre for Reproductive Medicine , Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Berntsen S, Söderström-Anttila V, Wennerholm UB, Laivuori H, Loft A, Oldereid NB, Romundstad LB, Bergh C, Pinborg A. The health of children conceived by ART: ‘the chicken or the egg?’. Hum Reprod Update 2019; 25:137-158. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmz001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 177] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sine Berntsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Kettegaard Alle 30, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Viveca Söderström-Anttila
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 2, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ulla-Britt Wennerholm
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital East, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Hannele Laivuori
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Teiskontie 35, Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Arvo Ylpön Katu 34, Tampere, Finland
- Medical and Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 8, Helsinki, Finland
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Tukhomankatu 8, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anne Loft
- Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nan B Oldereid
- Livio IVF-klinikken Oslo, Sørkedalsveien 10A, Oslo, Norway
| | - Liv Bente Romundstad
- Spiren Fertility Clinic, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 222 Skøyen, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 222 Skøyen, Oslo, Norway
| | - Christina Bergh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anja Pinborg
- Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hershberger PE, Driessnack M, Kavanaugh K, Klock SC. Oocyte donation disclosure decisions: a longitudinal follow-up at middle childhood. HUM FERTIL 2019; 24:31-45. [PMID: 30724630 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2019.1567945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Few studies have captured oocyte donation (OD) parents' decision processes about intended and actual disclosure over time. Likewise, OD children's perceptions about their family composition during middle childhood are underexplored. To address these gaps, a longitudinally followed cohort of OD recipient families was invited to participate in a qualitative, follow-up study. With an 86% response rate after 12 years, families were composed of oocyte recipient mothers (n = 6) and biological fathers (n = 6) representing 12 donor-oocyte conceived children (10.33 ± 1.23 years; mean ± SD). Of the 12 children, two that were aware and two that were unaware of their conceptual origins completed conversational interviews. Only one family in the initial cohort had disclosed OD to their children by the 12-year follow-up, despite 43% of parents intending to disclose and another 43% undecided about disclosure during pregnancy. Four parental disclosure patterns emerged at 12 years: (i) wanting to disclose; (ii) conflicted about disclosure; (iii) not planning to disclose; and (iv) having disclosed. Children that were unaware of their conceptual origins displayed no knowledge of their method of conception. There is a need for family-centric interventions to assist 'wanting to disclose' parents in their disclosure process and 'conflicted about disclosure' parents in their decision-making process post-OD treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia E Hershberger
- Department of Health Systems Science, College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Martha Driessnack
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Karen Kavanaugh
- Department of Nursing Research, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Susan C Klock
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Long-term outcomes of children conceived through egg donation and their parents: a review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2018; 110:1187-1193. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Revised: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
15
|
de Melo-Martín I, Rubin LR, Cholst IN. "I want us to be a normal family": Toward an understanding of the functions of anonymity among U.S. oocyte donors and recipients. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2018; 9:235-251. [PMID: 30398412 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1528308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anonymity remains the more common practice in gamete donations, but legislation prohibiting anonymity with a goal of protecting donor-conceived children's right to know their genetic origins is becoming more common. However, given the dearth of research investigating the function of anonymity for donors and recipients, it is unclear whether these policies will accomplish their goals. The aim of this study was to explore experiences with anonymity among oocyte donors and recipients who participated in an anonymous donor oocyte program and to understand the ways in which anonymity functions for them. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with 50 women: 28 oocyte donors and 22 recipients who were recruited from an academic center for reproductive medicine in the United States. RESULTS Donors and recipients view anonymity both as a mechanism to protect the interests of all parties (recipients, donors, and donor-conceived children) and as a point of conflict. Specifically, three key areas were identified where both donors and recipients saw anonymity as having an important role: relieving anxieties about family structures and obligations; protecting their interests and those of donor-conceived children (while acknowledging where interests conflict); and managing the future. CONCLUSION As gamete donation increasingly moves away from the practice of anonymity, examining why anonymity matters to stakeholders will be helpful in devising strategies to successfully implement identity-release options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lisa R Rubin
- b Department of Psychology , New School for Social Research
| | - Ina N Cholst
- c The Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine , Weill Cornell Medical College
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Indekeu A, Lampic C. The interaction between donor-conceived families and their environment: parents' perceptions of societal understanding and attitudes regarding their family-building. HUM FERTIL 2018; 24:14-23. [PMID: 30388044 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2018.1533256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Disclosure issues in relation to donor conception have mainly been examined in the context of relationships and interaction within donor-conceived families, whilst influences from outside the family, for example societal ones, have been little researched. This study explored the societal experiences of individuals who build their family with the help of donor conception (i.e. donor-conceived families), specifically, where and how parents and society interact and the presence and influence of cultural beliefs and values regarding the family. Belgian (n = 89) and Swedish (n = 56) donor-conceiving parents completed an online-survey focusing on their experiences with societal perceptions and attitudes and behaviour and responses from friends, healthcare professionals and teachers. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses were conducted. Results showed that donor-conceiving parents were challenged by societal representations, responses from friends, healthcare professionals and teachers, and cultural norms and values. Parents had to cope with lack of knowledge and understanding of donor-conceived families and colliding views on the relevance of genes in kinship. They needed to be able to explain and defend themselves, correct others and handle emotions and sensitivity when managing these interactions. Through psycho-education health-care professionals can help families anticipate potential reactions and manage societal responses by strengthening parents' coping mechanisms. These findings also call for awareness of the presence of cultural norms and values even when counsellor and patient share the same culture because counsellor and donor-conceiving parents can relate differently to (collide or conform with them) the shared cultural norms, which can impact on parents' experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Indekeu
- Department of Neurobiology Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.,Department of Sociology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Claudia Lampic
- Department of Neurobiology Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.,Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vesali SV, Karimi E, Mohammadi M, Omani-Samani R. Attitude of Law and Medical Students to Oocyte Donation. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY 2018; 12:114-118. [PMID: 29707926 PMCID: PMC5936607 DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2018.5178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Background Among the young generation, medical and law students’ attitude towards third party reproduction is
very important because they will be directly involved in restricting or developing the programs that will support it in
the future. The aim of this survey was to investigate attitude of law and medical students to oocyte donation and key
aspects of this kind of third party. Materials and Methods In analytical cross-sectional study, 345 medical and law students were randomly selected
using stratified sampling. Data was collected using attitude toward donation- oocyte (ATOD-O) questionnaire. Re-
sponses were on a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed according to established statistical approach by Heeren
and D'Agostino. Results The majority of the participants agreed with oocyte donation being the last choice for infertility treatment.
There was a significant difference between medical students and law students regarding the acceptance of oocyte
donation (3.23 vs. 3.53, P=0.025). In addition, female participants were more tolerant on receiving donated oocytes
from their sisters than male participants (3.01 vs. 2.58, P=0.002) and finally, a higher number of the participants had
a positive attitude towards anonymity of the donor and the recipient to one another (3.93 vs. 3.86, P=0.580). The vast
majority of female students believed that the oocyte recipient naturally likes that child (P<0.0001). Conclusion In the current study, a great majority of law and medical students support oocyte donation as an alternative
way of starting a family. There is an interest among female students in donating oocytes anonymously. The majority
believed that the oocyte recipient family will like the donor oocyte child naturally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samira Vesali Vesali
- Department of Epidemiology and Reproductive Health, Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedical, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Elaheh Karimi
- Department of Epidemiology and Reproductive Health, Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedical, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Mohammadi
- Department of Epidemiology and Reproductive Health, Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedical, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Omani-Samani
- Department of Epidemiology and Reproductive Health, Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedical, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. Electronic Address:
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
When intended parents choose to have donor sperm treatment (DST), this may entail wide-ranging and long-lasting psychosocial implications related to the social parent not having a genetic tie with the child, how to disclose donor-conception and future donor contact. Counselling by qualified professionals is recommended to help intended parents cope with these implications. The objective of this study is to present findings and insights about how counsellors execute their counselling practices. We performed a qualitative study that included 13 counsellors working in the 11 clinics offering DST in the Netherlands. We held a focus group discussion and individual face-to-face semi-structured interviews, which were fully transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. The counsellors combined screening for eligibility and guidance within one session. They acted according to their individual knowledge and clinical experience and had different opinions on the issues they discussed with intended parents, which resulted in large practice variations. The counsellors were dependent on the admission policies of the clinics, which were mainly limited to regulating access to psychosocial counselling, which also lead to a variety of counselling practices. This means that evidence-based guidelines on counselling in DST need to be developed to provide consistent counselling with less practice variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marja Visser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Trudie Gerrits
- Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Sociology and Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fulco van der Veen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Mochtar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Frith L, Blyth E, Crawshaw M, van den Akker O. Secrets and disclosure in donor conception. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2018; 40:188-203. [PMID: 29143343 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
This article considers the disclosure, sharing and exchange of information on being donor conceived within families, drawing on data from a study undertaken with donor-conceived adults registered with UK Donor Link (a voluntary DNA-linking register). This paper considers the narratives of how respondents found out they were donor-conceived and what events triggered disclosure of this information. This paper then goes on to examine the role secrecy played in their family life and uses the concept of 'display' to explore how secrecy affected their relationships with their immediate and extended family. Secrets are notoriously 'leaky' and we found complex patterns of knowing and uncertainty about whom in the family knew that the person was donor-conceived. We argue that what is kept secret and from whom provides insights into the multifaceted web of social relationships that can be created by donor-conception, and how knowledge can be managed and controlled in attempts to display and maintain family narratives of biogenetic connection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Frith
- Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Eric Blyth
- School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, UK
| | - Marilyn Crawshaw
- Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rumpikova T, Oborna I, Belaskova S, Konecna H, Rumpik D. The attitudes of IVF patients treated in the Czech Republic towards informing children born after gamete donation. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2017; 162:26-31. [PMID: 29213142 DOI: 10.5507/bp.2017.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent decades gamete donation has received growing attention. Data from the Czech National Registry of Assisted Reproduction show that the number of cycles using donated oocytes has been increasing every year. According to Czech law, gamete donation is anonymous. Since 2011, some members of the Czech parliament have repeatedly made requests to revoke the anonymity but anonymity is one of the preconditions for such donation in this country. The aim of this study was to find out how the gamete recipients feel towards informing their child about the circumstances of their conception and their access to the identity of the donor. METHODS A total of 195 recipients (122 women undergoing treatment - 43 Czechs, 79 foreigners (Western Europe and the USA) and 73 male partners - 28 Czechs, 45 foreigners) participated in this survey. The data were obtained by anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS A significant difference between the attitude of the future Czech and foreign parents regarding disclosing the mode of conception was found (P = 0.003). The vast majority of Czechs were against disclosure. The foreign recipients were somewhat more divided. Regarding the donor's identity, there was no difference in atttitude between the groups. Recipients rarely consider that the knowledge of the donor's identity will be important for their child. The recipients overall, were convinced that the psychological aspects of parenting are far more important to the child than genetics, and see no reasons for disclosing the donor´s identity. CONCLUSION While the the foreign recipients were less adamant about non-disclosure, the overall finding was in accord with the current Czech law on anonymity and not in agreement with the proposed abolition. The recipient's attitudes towards disclosing were also culturally determined. The fact that some countries have revised their rules towards open idendity is not a rationale for such change in the Czech Republic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatana Rumpikova
- Clinic of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology Zlin, Czech Republic.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Ivana Oborna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Silvie Belaskova
- International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Hana Konecna
- Faculty of Health and Social Studies, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
| | - David Rumpik
- Clinic of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology Zlin, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rozati H, Handley T, Jayasena CN. Process and Pitfalls of Sperm Cryopreservation. J Clin Med 2017; 6:jcm6090089. [PMID: 28925939 PMCID: PMC5615282 DOI: 10.3390/jcm6090089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Revised: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 09/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Sperm cryopreservation has been utilized routinely for over 40 years to preserve fertility in men undergoing cancer therapy and allow conception for infertile couples. This article provides a concise and up-to-date review of the literature and covers the latest advances in sperm cryopreservation and its array of clinical indications. Over recent years, the scope of clinical indications used for sperm cryopreservation has expanded widely. Consequently, more patient groups are eligible for sperm freezing, requiring specialist resources and higher running costs. Although sperm cryopreservation prior to cancer therapy is readily available in many countries, referral rates by oncology specialists and levels of patient engagement with cryopreservation services are both reported as low. Furthermore, sperm banking continues to raise ethical issues such whether sperm donation should be anonymous and whether sperm can be utilized posthumously by the surviving partner without consent from the patient. This review focuses on the technological advances and ethical controversies in sperm cryopreservation, and how better understanding of these issues could lead to improved access to fertility preserving treatment for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamoun Rozati
- Section of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
| | - Thomas Handley
- Section of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
| | - Channa N Jayasena
- Section of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wyverkens E, Provoost V, Ravelingien A, Pennings G, De Sutter P, Buysse A. The Meaning of the Sperm Donor for Heterosexual Couples: Confirming the Position of the Father. FAMILY PROCESS 2017; 56:203-216. [PMID: 25908536 DOI: 10.1111/famp.12156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
In the literature, relatively little attention has been paid to the meaning of donor involvement in the intimate couple dyad. The current study aimed to enrich our understanding of couples' meaning-making regarding the anonymous sperm donor and how they dealt with the donor involvement. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine couples, who had at least one child conceived through sperm donation. Our thematic analysis showed that the donor conception was seen as a different path to create a normal family. Once the family was formed, most couples avoided talking about the donor because it was perceived as disrupting men's growing confidence in their position as father. Participants tried to confirm the position of the father to protect the family relationships. Uncertainties about how they were perceived as parents showed the continuing dominance of genetic ties within our social discourse. Participants also dealt with reminders of the donor in their daily life. Overall, they tried to manage the space taken up by the donor and to protect the position of the father. We relate our findings to literature on topic avoidance and shared obliviousness in families. For counseling practice, it could be useful to explore couples' meaning-making about the donor as this seemed to serve family functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elia Wyverkens
- Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Veerle Provoost
- Department of Philosophy, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - An Ravelingien
- Department of Philosophy, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Guido Pennings
- Department of Philosophy, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Petra De Sutter
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - Ann Buysse
- Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Freeman T, Zadeh S, Smith V, Golombok S. Disclosure of sperm donation: a comparison between solo mother and two-parent families with identifiable donors. Reprod Biomed Online 2016; 33:592-600. [PMID: 27617789 PMCID: PMC5084687 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2016] [Revised: 08/09/2016] [Accepted: 08/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Disclosure of donor conception to children was compared between solo mother and two-parent families with children aged 4–8 years conceived since the removal of donor anonymity in the UK. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 heterosexual solo mothers and 47 heterosexual mothers with partners to investigate their decisions and experiences about identifiable donation and disclosure to their children. No significant difference was found in the proportion of mothers in each family type who had told their children about their donor conception (solo mothers 54.8%; partnered mothers 36.2%). Of those who had not told, a significantly higher proportion of solo mothers than partnered mothers intended to disclose (P < 0.05). Partnered mothers were more likely than solo mothers to feel neutral, ambivalent or negative about having used an identifiable donor (P < 0.05), and were less likely to consider children's knowledge of their genetic origins as extremely important (P < 0.05). These findings are relevant to provision of counselling services as it cannot be assumed that parents will tell their children about their origins or their entitlement to request the identity of their donor at the age of 18 years. Further qualitative research would increase understanding of solo mothers' attitudes towards disclosure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tabitha Freeman
- Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge, CB2 3RF, UK.
| | - Sophie Zadeh
- Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge, CB2 3RF, UK
| | - Venessa Smith
- The London Women's Clinic, 113-115 Harley Street, London, W1G 6AP, UK
| | - Susan Golombok
- Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge, CB2 3RF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Canneaux M, Kobilinsky N, Wolf JP, Golse B, Beauquier-Maccotta B. [Information, transmission, secrecy: What kind of discourse for children born by gamete donation?]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 44:410-6. [PMID: 27318771 DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2015] [Accepted: 04/29/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The number of children born through gamete donation grows by the conceptions made abroad. All the couples engaging in this process do not benefit from of the same support around the issues raised by the information to the child and its terms. Through a literature review, the authors explore the data on information intentions from parents to child and to entourage, the influence of the issue of anonymity, the effective rate information, the influences of the age of the child, the terms information and links with family dynamics. The quantitative findings underscore the complexity of this task, since 10-90 % of couples report an intention to inform their child from conception through donation, while 5-30 % actually inform them after birth. Fifty-nine to 93 % of the relatives are nevertheless informed. The authors will highlight the psychopathological tracks that support the possibility of narration for parents: the internalization of their infertility, the representation of the gift, the development of rivalry towards donors, the secrecy and privacy. The objective of this article is to enable carers to accompany this reflection among future parents, a better listening of the issues raise by the couples allowing shoring their process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Canneaux
- Institut de psychologie, 71, avenue Édouard-Vaillant, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - N Kobilinsky
- Institut Édouard-Claparède, 5, rue du Général-Cordonnier, 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
| | - J P Wolf
- Inserm U1016, service d'histologie embryologie biologie de la reproduction, CECOS, hôpital Cochin, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France
| | - B Golse
- Service de pédopsychiatrie, hôpital Necker-Enfants-Malades, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tallandini MA, Zanchettin L, Gronchi G, Morsan V. Parental disclosure of assisted reproductive technology (ART) conception to their children: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Hum Reprod 2016; 31:1275-87. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2015] [Accepted: 02/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
26
|
Machin R. Anonimato e segredo na reprodução humana com participação de doador: mudanças em perspectivas. SAUDE E SOCIEDADE 2016. [DOI: 10.1590/s0104-12902016149132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumo As tecnologias reprodutivas, ao separar a sexuali dade da reprodução, interferiram não somente nas relações entre os sexos, mas também nas relações de filiação, possibilitando o surgimento de configu rações familiares decorrentes do acesso a material genético de terceiros (doadores de óvulos, sêmen ou embrião). O segredo e o anonimato que sempre envolveram os doadores de gametas têm sido desa fiados. Nos últimos vinte anos, diversos países alte raram sua legislação adotando a identidade aberta do doador de material genético. A possibilidade de conhecer e ter acesso a esta identidade (chegando à maioridade) ou mesmo a busca por meios irmãos pode ser uma realidade em muitos países para crianças nascidas por meio do acesso à tecnologia reprodutiva. O artigo enfatiza a questão do segredo e do anonimato envolvendo o uso de material ge nético de terceiros em tecnologias reprodutivas. A discussão é explorada por meio do debate ocorrido no Reino Unido relativo à abolição do anonimato e suas implicações sob a perspectiva dos doadores, dos casais demandantes e da criança concebida. O estudo reflete ainda sobre as concepções de família envolvidas nessa discussão.
Collapse
|
27
|
Isaksson S, Skoog-Svanberg A, Sydsjö G, Linell L, Lampic C. It takes two to tango: information-sharing with offspring among heterosexual parents following identity-release sperm donation. Hum Reprod 2015; 31:125-32. [PMID: 26637490 PMCID: PMC4677967 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2015] [Accepted: 10/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION How do heterosexual parents reason about and experience information-sharing with offspring following identity-release sperm donation? SUMMARY ANSWER Sharing information about using donor-conception with offspring is a complex process at several levels, with the parent's personal beliefs and the child's responses serving as driving or impeding forces for the information-sharing process. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The overall view of disclosure in gamete donation has shifted from secrecy to openness, but there is still uncertainty among parents concerning how and when to tell the child about his/her genetic origin. Most research on donor-conceived families has focused on donation treatment under anonymous or known circumstances, and there is a lack of studies in settings with identity-release donations. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A qualitative interview study among 30 parents following identity-release sperm donation treatment. Interviews were conducted from February 2014 to March 2015. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The present study is part of the prospective longitudinal Swedish Study on Gamete Donation (SSGD), including all fertility clinics performing gamete donation in Sweden. A sample of participants in the SSGD, consisting of heterosexual parents with children aged 7–8 years following identity-release sperm donation, participated in individual semi-structured interviews. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The analysis revealed one main theme: information-sharing is a process, with three subthemes; (i) the parent as process manager, (ii) the child as force or friction and (iii) being in the process. The first two subthemes were viewed as being linked together and their content served as driving or impeding forces in the information-sharing process. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The fact that the study was performed within the context of the Swedish legislation on identity-release donation must be taken into consideration as regards transferability to other populations, as this may affect parents' reasoning concerning their information-sharing with the child. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The present findings highlight the role of the donor-conceived child in the information-sharing process and may contribute to develop counselling that increases parents' confidence in handling children's reactions to information about their genetic origin. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Financial support from The Swedish Research Council, The Family Planning Fund in Uppsala and Ferring Pharmaceuticals. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Isaksson
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, S-751 22 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - A Skoog-Svanberg
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - G Sydsjö
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, S-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
| | - L Linell
- Department of Social Work, Karolinska University Hospital, S-141 86 Huddinge, Sweden
| | - C Lampic
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, S-751 22 Uppsala, Sweden Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, S-141 83 Huddinge, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Söderström-Anttila V, Wennerholm UB, Loft A, Pinborg A, Aittomäki K, Romundstad LB, Bergh C. Surrogacy: outcomes for surrogate mothers, children and the resulting families—a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2015; 22:260-76. [DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmv046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2015] [Accepted: 09/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
29
|
Mandatory counseling for gamete donation recipients: ethical dilemmas. Fertil Steril 2015; 104:507-12. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2015] [Revised: 07/20/2015] [Accepted: 07/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
30
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Available studies on surrogacy are extremely limited. Findings suggest that surrogacy is experienced as problem free, with a significant number of commissioning mothers maintaining contact with the surrogates over time. AIM To explore the experiences of Greek commissioning women regarding the surrogacy arrangement and birth of a child through surrogacy. METHODS The data of this study were collected from 7 intended mothers who had either a long history of infertility or serious health problems. Interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed and analysed employing content analysis. FINDINGS The analysis of the women's accounts revealed three themes: (a) a shared journey, (b) the birth of a long-awaited child, and (c) the surrogacy disclosure. The surrogacy process became the women's affairs, with their partners offering backstage support. A very close bond was developed with the surrogates, characterised by daily contacts and care-giving behaviours. While this bond was abruptly discontinued after the child's birth, it was interiorised with all participants being grateful to their surrogate. The timing and content of the surrogacy disclosure to family and child(ren) were carefully chosen by participants, who avoided providing information when egg donation was involved. CONCLUSION Findings are reassuring for women who want to parent a child through a surrogate arrangement, and suggest that the availability of counselling services may help intended mothers to cope with disclosure issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaira Papaligoura
- Department of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | | | - Thalia Bellali
- Department of Nursing, Alexandreio Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hammarberg K, Wilson C, McBain J, Fisher J, Halliday J. Age when learning about mode of conception and well-being among young adults conceived with ART. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2015. [DOI: 10.1080/02646838.2015.1015115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
32
|
Crawshaw M, Montuschi O. It ‘did what it said on the tin’ – Participant's views of the content and process of donor conception parenthood preparation workshops. HUM FERTIL 2014; 17:11-20. [DOI: 10.3109/14647273.2014.881562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
33
|
Wilde R, McTavish A, Crawshaw M. Family building using donated gametes and embryos in the UK: Recommendations for policy and practice on behalf of the British Infertility Counselling Association and the British Fertility Society in collaboration with the Association of Clinical Embryologists and the Royal College of Nurses Fertility Nurses Forum. HUM FERTIL 2013; 17:1-10. [PMID: 24329028 DOI: 10.3109/14647273.2013.862041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Wilde
- Complete Fertility Centre Southampton, Princess Anne Hospital , Southampton, Hampshire , UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hammarberg K, Johnson L, Bourne K, Fisher J, Kirkman M. Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response. Hum Reprod 2013; 29:286-92. [PMID: 24319103 PMCID: PMC3896224 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION How do gamete donors who presumed they could remain anonymous respond to proposed legislation to retrospectively remove anonymity? SUMMARY ANSWER A little more than half of the donors opposed the recommendation to introduce legislation to remove donor anonymity with retrospective effect. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY An increasing proportion of parents disclose their origins to their donor-conceived children and growing numbers of donor-conceived adults are aware of how they were conceived. Research indicates that access to information about the donor is important to donor-conceived people. However, worldwide most donor-conceived people are unable to find any identifying information about the donor because of the practice of anonymous gamete donation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This study adopted a qualitative research model using semi-structured interviews with gamete donors that included open questions. Interviews with 42 volunteers were conducted between December 2012 and February 2013. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Before 1998 gamete donors in Victoria, Australia, were able to remain anonymous. Pre-1998 donors were invited through an advertising campaign to be interviewed about their views on a recommendation that legislation mandating retrospective release of identifying information be introduced. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Donors were almost evenly split between those who supported and those who rejected the recommendation to introduce legislation to remove donor anonymity with retrospective effect. About half of the donors who rejected the recommendation suggested the compromise of persuading donors voluntarily to release information (whether identifying or non-identifying) to donor-conceived people. These donors were themselves willing to supply information to their donor offspring. The findings of this study informed the Victorian Government's response to the proposed legislative change. While acknowledging donor-conceived people's right of access to information about their donors, the Government decided that identifying information should be released only with the consent of donors and that donors should be encouraged to allow themselves to be identifiable to their donor offspring. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION There is no way of knowing whether participants were representative of all pre-1998 donors. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The balancing of donors' and donor-conceived people's rights requires utmost sensitivity. All over the world, increasing numbers of donor-conceived people are reaching adulthood; of those who are aware of their mode of conception, some are likely to have a strong wish to know the identity of their donors. Legislators and policy-makers in jurisdictions permitting anonymous gamete donations will need to respond when these desires are expressed, and may choose to be guided by the model of consultation described in this paper. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS The study was funded by the Victorian Department of Health. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Hammarberg
- Jean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Baccino G, Salvadores P, Hernández ER. Disclosing their type of conception to offspring conceived by gamete or embryo donation in Spain. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2013. [DOI: 10.1080/02646838.2013.853171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
36
|
'Of course he's our child': transitions in social parenthood in donor sperm recipient families. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 28:106-15. [PMID: 24257206 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2013] [Revised: 06/19/2013] [Accepted: 09/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
This study examines transitions and consistencies in the views of donor sperm recipients on ‘parenthood’ and ‘family’ over time. A longitudinal qualitative study was carried out with 19 donor sperm recipients. Interviews took place during pregnancy, at birth and 1.5–2 years after birth and were analysed using a grounded theory approach. Participants intending to disclose the donor conception to their offspring (13/19) exhibited a transition from feeling anxious prior to birth to feeling more confident during the toddler stage about their parenthood. Previous anxieties about the lack of biological ties decreased as emerging social ties became more significant. Following birth, these participants (13/19) felt acknowledged by others as parents, which elicited feelings of normalization. Being able to engage in parenting and develop parental relations enhanced their confidence in their parental position. This confidence empowered donor sperm recipients to tackle future challenges and made them more convinced about their disclosure intention. Participants intending not to disclose the donor conception (6/19) reported viewing their parenthood as no different from parenthood experienced by naturally conceiving parents, no transitions were observed and insecurity about physical traits that could reveal the donor conception remained. These findings have implications for counselling throughout specific stages in parenthood.
Collapse
|
37
|
Blyth E, Kramer W, Schneider J. Perspectives, experiences, and choices of parents of children conceived following oocyte donation. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 26:179-88. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2012] [Revised: 10/15/2012] [Accepted: 10/16/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
38
|
Crawshaw M, Montuschi O. Participants’ views of attending parenthood preparation workshops for those contemplating donor conception parenthood. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2013. [DOI: 10.1080/02646838.2012.748886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
39
|
Isaksson S, Sydsjö G, Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C. Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years. Hum Reprod 2012; 27:2998-3007. [PMID: 22859508 PMCID: PMC3442633 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Do heterosexual parents of young children following oocyte donation (OD) and sperm
donation (SD) tell or intend to tell their offspring about the way he/she was
conceived? SUMMARY ANSWER Following successful treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors in
Sweden, almost all heterosexual couples intend to tell their offspring about the way
he/she was conceived and some start the information-sharing process very early. WHAT IS KNOWN AND WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS Although the Swedish legislation on identity-release gamete donors has been in effect
since 1985, there is a discrepancy between the behaviour of donor-insemination parents
and the legal intention that offspring be informed about their genetic origin. The
present study contributes data on a relatively large sample of oocyte and sperm
recipient couples' intended compliance with the Swedish legislation. DESIGN AND DATA COLLECTION METHOD The present study constitutes a follow-up assessment of heterosexual couples who had
given birth to a child following treatment with donated oocytes. Data collection was
performed during 2007–2011; participants individually completed a questionnaire
when the child was between 1 and 4 years of age. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING The present study is part of the Swedish Study on Gamete Donation, a prospective
longitudinal cohort study including all fertility clinics performing gamete donation in
Sweden. For children conceived via OD, 107 individuals (including 52 couples and 3
individuals) agreed to participate (73% response). For children conceived via SD,
the response rate was 70% (n = 122 individuals, including
59 couples and 4 individuals). Mean age of participants was 34 years (SD 4.4) and they
reported a high level of education. MAIN RESULTS The majority of participants (78%) planned to tell the child about the donation,
16% had already started the information-sharing process and 6% planned not
to tell their child about the donation or were undecided. Many were unsure about a
suitable time to start the disclosure process and desired more information about
strategies and tools for information sharing. Agreement on disclosure to offspring
within the couple was related to the quality of the partner relationship. BIAS AND GENERALIZABILITY There is a risk of selection bias, with gamete recipients preferring secrecy and
non-disclosure declining study participation. The results may be regarded as partly
generalizable to heterosexual couples with young children following treatment with
gametes from legislatively mandated identity-release donors in an established donor
programme. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS Study funding by Merck Serono, The Swedish Research Council and The Family Planning
Fund in Uppsala. No conflicts of interest to declare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Isaksson
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, S-751 22 Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
MacCallum F, Keeley S. Disclosure patterns of embryo donation mothers compared with adoption and IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 2012; 24:745-8. [PMID: 22503339 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2011] [Revised: 01/13/2012] [Accepted: 01/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Attitudes towards information sharing in donor conception have changed in recent years in some parts of the world, with a move towards openness. This study follows up a sample of embryo donation mothers, examining their current disclosure patterns and comparing them with adoptive and IVF mothers to investigate any influence of the method of family creation. This study compared 17 mothers with an embryo donation child aged 5-9 years with 24 mothers with an adopted child and 28 mothers with a genetically related IVF child. Embryo donation mothers were far less likely to share information with the child; 43% were inclined towards disclosing, compared with all adoptive mothers and nearly 90% of IVF mothers. Furthermore, embryo donation and IVF mothers who had disclosed had often only given partial explanations of the child's conception. Differences between embryo donation and adoption in particular should be taken into account when advising embryo recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona MacCallum
- Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Stephenson J, Blyth E, Kramer W, Schneider J. Donor type and parental disclosure following oocyte donation. ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s2305-0500(13)60046-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
42
|
Full-sibling embryos created by anonymous gamete donation in unrelated recipients. Fertil Steril 2012; 97:e4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2011] [Accepted: 11/09/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
43
|
Views of donors and recipients regarding disclosure to children following altruistic known oocyte donation. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 23:851-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2011] [Revised: 06/03/2011] [Accepted: 06/07/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
44
|
Stuart-smith SJ, Smith JA, Scott EJ. Treatment decision making in anonymous donor eggin-vitrofertilisation: A qualitative study of childless women and women with genetically related children. HUM FERTIL 2011; 14:97-105. [DOI: 10.3109/14647273.2011.571747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
45
|
Isaksson S, Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjö G, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Karlström PO, Solensten NG, Lampic C. Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation? Hum Reprod 2011; 26:853-60. [PMID: 21212053 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two decades after the introduction of Swedish legislation that allows children born as a result of gamete donation access to identifying information about the donor, a nationwide multicentre study on the psychosocial consequences of this legislation for recipients and donors of gametes was initiated in 2005. The aim of the present study was to investigate recipient couples' attitudes and behaviour regarding disclosure to offspring and others, attitudes towards genetic parenthood and perceptions of information regarding parenthood after donation. METHODS The present study is part of the prospective longitudinal 'Swedish study on gamete donation', including all fertility clinics performing donation treatment in Sweden. A consecutive cohort of 152 heterosexual recipient couples of donated oocytes (72% response) and 127 heterosexual recipient couples of donated sperm (81% response) accepted participation in the study. In connection with the donation treatment, male and female participants individually completed two questionnaires with study-specific instruments concerning disclosure, genetic parenthood and informational aspects. RESULTS About 90% of participants (in couples receiving anonymous donated gametes) supported disclosure and openness to the offspring concerning his/her genetic origin. Only 6% of all participants had not told other people about their donation treatment. Between 26 and 40% of participants wanted additional information/support about parenthood following donation treatment. CONCLUSIONS Two decades after the Swedish legislation of identifiable gamete donors, recipient couples of anonymously donated sperm and oocytes are relatively open about their treatment and support disclosure to offspring. Recipient couples may benefit from more information and support regarding parenthood after gamete donation. Further studies are required to follow-up on the future parents' actual disclosure behaviour directed to offspring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Isaksson
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, S-751 22 Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|