Administration of corifollitropin alfa on Day 2 versus Day 4 of the cycle in a GnRH antagonist protocol: a randomized controlled pilot study

Corifollitropin Alfa for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies: State of the Art

Physical and emotional burdens during the journey of infertile people through assisted reproductive technologies are sufficient to justify the efforts in developing patient-friendly treatment strategies. Thus, shorter duration of ovarian stimulation protocols and the need for less injections may improve adherence, prevent mistakes, and reduce financial costs. Therefore, the sustained follicle-stimulating action of corifollitropin alfa may be the most differentiating pharmacokinetic characteristic among available gonadotropins. In this paper, we gather the evidence on its use, aiming to provide the information needed for considering it as a first choice when a patient-friendly strategy is desired.

A prospective randomized trial comparing corifollitropin-α late-start (day 4) versus standard administration (day 2) in expected poor, normal, and high responders undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether corifollitropin-α (CFα) late-start administration (day 4) and standard administration (day 2) can obtain similar oocyte yield and live birth rate.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

University Hospital IVF Unit.

PATIENTS

One hundred thirteen women undergoing IVF.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients distributed in three subgroups (expected poor, normal, or high responders to FSH) were randomized into two treatment arms: (a) CFα late-start: CFα on day 4 + GnRH antagonist from day 8 + (when needed) recFSH from day 11; (b) CFα standard start: CFα on day 2 + GnRH antagonist from day 6 + (when needed) recFSH from day 9. IVF or ICSI was performed as indicated.

RESULTS

Considering the whole study group, the late-start regimen obtained comparable oocyte yield (8.9 ± 5.6 vs. 8.8 ± 6.2; p = n.s.), cPR/started cycle (25% vs. 31.6%, p = n.s.), and cumulative live birth rate (LBR)/ovum pickup (OPU) (29.2% vs. 37.7%, p = n.s.) than the standard regimen. The outcome of the two regimens was comparable in the two subgroups of high and normal responders. Differently, in poor responders, oocyte yield was similar, but LBR/OPU was significantly lower with late-start CFα administration that caused 40% cancellation rate due to monofollicular response. ROC curves showed that the threshold AMH levels associated with cycle cancellation were 0.6 ng/ml for late-start regimen and 0.2 ng/ml for standard regimen.

CONCLUSION

CFα may be administered on either day 2 or day 4 to patients with expected high or normal response to FSH without compromising oocyte yield and/or live birth rate. Differently, late-start administration is not advisable for expected poor responders with AMH ≤ 0.6 ng/ml.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03816670.

Desogestrel versus antagonist injections for LH suppression in oocyte donation cycles: a crossover study

To study whether ovarian response to corifollitropin among oocyte donors (OD) is different when oral desogestrel (DSG) is used to block the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge when compared to GnRH-antagonist use. This is a retrospective, cohort study at a private, university-based, IVF center including 35 OD. Patients underwent two stimulation cycles under corifollitropin alfa (CFT), one under an antagonist and another under DSG, between February 2015 and May 2017. In antagonist cycles, daily ganirelix was administered since a leading follicle reached 14 mm. In the DSG cycles, daily oral DSG was prescribed. The main outcome measure was oocytes retrieved. Compared to antagonist cycles, cycles under DSG received fewer injections (10.3 ± 2.8 vs. 5.0 ± 2.1, p < .001), nominally lower total supplementary gonadotropin dose (497.4 ± 338.9I U vs. 442.9 ± 332.8 IU, p=.45) with a lower total cost of medication (1018.6 ± 191.0€ vs. 813.8 ± 145.9€, p<.001). There were no differences in the total number of retrieved oocytes between groups (17.4 ± 7.5 vs. 18.6 ± 8.9, p=.34). In the corresponding oocyte recipients, clinical pregnancy rate was similar between groups: 52.0% vs. 58.6%, respectively (p=.78). ODs' stimulation's response under DSG is similar when compared to (17.4 ± 7.5 vs. 18.6 ± 8.9, p=.34) but associated with less injections and lower medication costs. The main advantage of this strategy is its simplicity, an aspect of utmost importance in the management of ODs.

Efficacy and safety of late-start Corifollitropin-alfa administration for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF: a cohort, case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate efficacy and safety of a controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol in which a single dose of Corifollitropin-alfa (CFα) was administered on day 4 of a GnRH-antagonist cycle.

DESIGN

Cohort case-control study.

SETTING

University Hospital.

PATIENTS

One hundred twenty-two normally cycling women expected to be normal responders to COS.

INTERVENTIONS

In 61 patients, CFα (100-150 μg) was injected subcutaneously on day 4 of a spontaneous menstrual cycle; a GnRH-antagonist was added from day 8 (fixed protocol; 0.25 mg/day). If needed to complete follicular maturation, recombinant FSH (rFSH) daily injections (150/200 IU/day) were given from day 11. A control group of 61 matched women was stimulated with daily subcutaneous injections of rFSH (100-150 U/day) from day 4 of the cycle, and received GnRH-antagonist (0.25 mg/day) from day 8. IVF or ICSI was performed according to the sperm characteristics, and 1-2 embryos were transferred in utero under US guidance on day 2.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of retrieved cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs), clinical pregnancy rate (PR), implantation rate (IR), ongoing PR at 10 weeks, number of injections/cycle, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate.

RESULTS

No cycle was cancelled and the mean number of retrieved COCs was comparable in patients and controls. About 60% of CF-alfa treated women had no need of daily rFSH addition, and the mean number of injections/cycle was significantly lower in the CF-alfa group than in controls (p < 0.05). The ongoing PR/transfer was 36.8% in CF-alfa group and 37.5% in controls. No patient developed severe OHSS, and the incidence of moderate OHSS was similar in cases and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

CFα may be started on day 4 of the cycle obtaining results comparable to those of a COS using day 4-start daily rFSH, with significantly less injections and a similar risk of OHSS.