Factors affecting female sexual well-being: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised clinical trial on post-abortion contraception

INTRODUCTION

Sexual well-being is associated with general well-being. Several factors, such as overweight, infertility, anxiety and sex hormones, also play a role, but the effects of hormonal contraception remain a point of debate. We characterised the factors associated with sexual well-being in fertile-aged women following induced abortion.

METHODS

A 5-year follow-up of a nested, longitudinal, cohort study examining the effects of routine provision of intrauterine contraception as part of abortion care. Sexual well-being, anxiety and quality of life were assessed annually using validated questionnaires (McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and EuroQoL), along with data on general and reproductive health, and relationship status. Of the 742 women participating in the trial, 290 (39%) provided sufficient follow-up data and were included in this study.

RESULTS

Based on trajectories of McCoy scores across the 5-year follow-up, two groups were identified: those with stable and higher (n=223, 76.9%) and those with declining sexual well-being (n=67, 23.1%). Women in the group of declining sexual well-being had significantly higher levels of anxiety and lower quality of life at all time points. They also had chronic diseases more often and were less happy in their relationships. No differences were found in method of contraception when classified as hormonal versus non-hormonal, or long-acting versus short-acting reversible contraception.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower anxiety and higher quality of life are associated with stable and higher sexual well-being. Method of contraception or relationship status are not associated with sexual well-being during long-term follow-up in fertile-aged women.

Effectiveness and Harms of Contraceptive Counseling and Provision Interventions for Women : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and harms of contraceptive counseling and provision interventions are unclear.

PURPOSE

To evaluate evidence of the effectiveness of contraceptive counseling and provision interventions for women to increase use of contraceptives and reduce unintended pregnancy, as well as evidence of their potential harms.

DATA SOURCES

English-language searches of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, and MEDLINE (1 January 2000 to 3 February 2022) and reference lists of key studies and systematic reviews.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials of interventions providing enhanced contraceptive counseling, contraceptives, or both versus usual care or an active control.

DATA EXTRACTION

Dual extraction and quality assessment of studies; results combined using a profile likelihood random-effects model.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 38 trials (43 articles [25 472 participants]) met inclusion criteria. Contraceptive use was higher with various counseling interventions (risk ratio [RR], 1.39 [95% CI, 1.16 to 1.72]; I 2 = 85.3%; 10 trials), provision of emergency contraception in advance of use (RR, 2.12 [CI, 1.79 to 2.36]; I 2 = 0.0%; 8 trials), and counseling or provision postpartum (RR, 1.15 [CI, 1.01 to 1.52]; I 2 = 6.6%; 5 trials) or at the time of abortion (RR, 1.19 [CI, 1.09 to 1.32]; I 2 = 0.0%; 5 trials) than with usual care or active controls in multiple clinical settings. Pregnancy rates were generally lower with interventions, although most trials were underpowered and did not distinguish pregnancy intention. Interventions did not increase risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (RR, 1.05 [CI, 0.87 to 1.25]; I 2 = 0.0%; 5 trials) or reduce condom use (RR, 1.03 [CI, 0.94 to 1.13]; I 2 = 0.0%; 6 trials).

LIMITATION

Interventions varied; few trials were adequately designed to determine unintended pregnancy outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Contraceptive counseling and provision interventions that provide services beyond usual care increase contraceptive use without increasing STIs or reducing condom use. Contraceptive care in clinical practice could be improved by implementing enhanced contraceptive counseling, provision, and follow-up; providing emergency contraception in advance; and delivering contraceptive services immediately postpartum or at the time of abortion.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Resources Legacy Fund. (PROSPERO: CRD42020192981).

Continuation of Contraception Following Termination of Pregnancy in a Canadian Urban Centre

OBJECTIVE

Minimal evidence exists on the continuation of contraception following termination of pregnancy. Continuation of effective contraception is important because it has been found to reduce unintended pregnancies. This study aims to determine the rate of continuation and choice of contraception following termination of pregnancy.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analytic study was undertaken of 400 patients undergoing termination of pregnancy over 2 years. Demographic information and contraception choice prior to, at time of, and 6 months following termination were collected. Data were analyzed to assess relationships between patient characteristics and contraceptive choice.

RESULTS

Prior to termination, 58.5% of patients were not using contraception and 22.4% used a less effective method (e.g., barrier or fertility awareness). Following termination, 99.7% of patients chose a method of contraception, and 95.2% chose a more effective method (e.g., long acting reversible contraception, permanent sterilization, combined hormonal contraceptives, progesterone-only contraceptive). Six months following termination, 85.8% of patients were using contraception. A more effective method was continued by 37.8%. There were no significant relationships between choice of contraception and age, previous pregnancies, or social determinants of health. Patients living with their sexual partner were significantly more likely to switch to a less effective method of contraception at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Following termination of pregnancy, almost all patients chose a method of contraception and most continued using contraception 6 months following termination.

Contraceptive priorities among women seeking family planning services in Finland in 2017-2019

OBJECTIVE

To assess how women's reproductive history, contraceptive experience and need of abortion care are associated with priorities for contraception.

STUDY DESIGN

In this cross-sectional survey study, we gathered information on women's history of births and abortions, previous use and satisfaction with contraceptive methods, and features of contraceptive methods they value most. Women were recruited at public family planning and outpatient abortion clinics in the capital region of Helsinki, Finland.

RESULTS

Of the 1006 women responding, 502 were recruited during visits for abortion care and 504 for contraceptive counseling. Women seeking abortion care more often had a history of abortion than women seeking contraceptive counseling (44% vs 11%), presented with a higher mean number of different contraceptive methods used (69% vs 55% with more than 2 previous methods), and were less often satisfied with the methods used (36% vs 60% satisfied with 2 out of 3 methods), p < 0.001 for all. In addition, women seeking abortion care had lower odds of prioritizing effectiveness (aOR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.5), and higher odds of prioritizing lower hormonal levels or non-hormonal alternatives (aOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3.2). There was no difference between the groups regarding priorities of lesser pelvic pain (aOR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-1.1), regular period (aOR 01.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.9), or the method being easy to use (aOR 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.8).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a contrast between guidelines emphasizing effectiveness in postabortion contraception, and many women's contraceptive priorities.

IMPLICATION STATEMENT

Clinicians providing contraceptive counseling must be mindful of each individual's personal contraceptive priorities.

Early provision of intrauterine contraception as part of abortion care-5-year results of a randomised controlled trial

STUDY QUESTION

Can the incidence of subsequent termination of pregnancy (TOP) be reduced by providing intrauterine contraception as part of the abortion service?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Provision of an intrauterine device (IUD) as part of TOP services reduced the need for subsequent TOP but the effect was limited to the first 3 years of the 5-year follow-up.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

An IUD is highly effective in preventing subsequent TOP. Prompt initiation of IUD use leads to a higher usage rate during follow-up, as compliance with post-TOP IUD insertion visits is low.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

The objective of this randomised controlled trial was to assess the effect of early comprehensive provision of intrauterine contraception after TOP, with primary outcome being the incidence of subsequent TOP during the 5 years of follow-up after the index abortion. This study was conducted at a tertiary care centre between 18 October 2010 and 21 January 2013. Altogether, 748 women undergoing a first trimester TOP were recruited and randomised into two groups. The intervention group (n = 375) was provided with an IUD during surgical TOP or 1-4 weeks following medical TOP at the hospital providing the abortion care. Women in the control group (n = 373) were advised to contact primary health care for follow-up and IUD insertion. Subsequent TOPs during the 5-year follow-up were identified from the Finnish Register on induced abortions.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, duration of gestation ≤12 weeks, residence in Helsinki and accepting intrauterine contraception. Women with contraindications to IUD were excluded.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The overall numbers of subsequent TOPs were 50 in the intervention and 72 in the control group (26.7 versus 38.6/1000 years of follow-up, P = 0.027), and those of requested TOPs, including TOPs and early pregnancy failures, were 58 and 76, respectively (30.9 versus 40.8/1000, P = 0.080). Altogether 40 (10.7%) women in the intervention and 63 (16.9%) in the control group underwent one or several subsequent TOPs (hazard ratio 1.67 [95% CI 1.13 to 2.49], P = 0.011). The number of TOPs was reduced by the intervention during years 0-3 (22.2 versus 46.5/1000, P = 0.035), but not during years 4-5 (33.3 versus 26.8/1000, P = 0.631).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Both medical and surgical TOP were used. This may be seen as a limitation, but it also reflects the contemporary practice of abortion care. The immediate post-TOP care was provided by two different organizations, allowing us to compare two different ways of contraceptive service provision following TOP.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Providing TOP and IUD insertion comprehensively in the same heath care unit leads to significantly higher rates of attendance, IUD use and a significantly lower risk of subsequent TOP.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was supported by Helsinki University Central Hospital Research funds and by research grants provided by the Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation, the Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation and Finska Läkaresällskapet. E.P. has received a personal research grant from the Finnish Medical Society. The City of Helsinki supported the study by providing the IUDs. The funding organisations had no role in planning or execution of the study, or in analysing the study results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01223521).

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

18 October 2010.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT

18 October 2010.

Association between contraceptive method chosen after induced abortion and incidence of repeat abortion in Northern Portugal

OBJECTIVES

In Portugal, a country with strong Catholic roots, elective termination of pregnancy at women's request is still stigmatised, especially if it is a repeat abortion. The objectives of this study were to determine the incidence of repeat abortion, taking into account the contraceptive method chosen after the index abortion event, and characterise the risk factors for repeat abortion.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 988 women who requested termination of pregnancy during 2015 in a Portuguese tertiary care public hospital. Contraception was given free of charge after the index event. The occurrence of a repeat induced abortion was evaluated during a 24 month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Forty-nine (5.0%) of the 988 women had a repeat abortion. Users of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) had fewer repeat abortions compared with users of non-LARC methods. Overall repeat abortion was 0.8% in subcutaneous contraceptive implant users, 1.5% in intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) users, 2.8% in vaginal ring users and 5.8% in oral contraceptives users (p < 0.05). Cox hazards ratio (HR) analysis showed that method choice after abortion correlated significantly with the probability of repeat abortion (p < 0.05). Using women choosing oral contraception as the reference group, the HRs (95% CIs) for repeat abortion were as follows: IUCD 0.282 (0.084, 0.942), contraceptive implant 0.142 (0.019, 1.050), vaginal ring 0.508 (0.175, 1.477).

CONCLUSION

Even though highly effective contraceptive methods are freely accessible in Portugal, other challenges must be managed to improve outcomes, such as a timely, patient-centred counselling approach.

No. 360-Induced Abortion: Surgical Abortion and Second Trimester Medical Methods

OBJECTIVE

This guideline reviews evidence relating to the provision of surgical induced abortion (IA) and second trimester medical abortion, including pre- and post-procedural care.

INTENDED USERS

Gynaecologists, family physicians, nurses, midwives, residents, and other health care providers who currently or intend to provide and/or teach IAs.

TARGET POPULATION

Women with an unintended or abnormal first or second trimester pregnancy.

EVIDENCE

PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Database were searched using the key words: first-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester medical abortion, dilation and evacuation, induction abortion, feticide, cervical preparation, cervical dilation, abortion complications. Results were restricted to English or French systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational studies published from 1979 to July 2017. National and international clinical practice guidelines were consulted for review. Grey literature was not searched.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework. The summary of findings is available upon request.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS

IA is safe and effective. The benefits of IA outweigh the potential harms or costs. No new direct harms or costs identified with these guidelines.

Trends and determinants of postabortion contraception use in a Canadian retrospective cohort

OBJECTIVES

We aim to describe demographic trends associated with postabortion contraceptive choice, characteristics of intrauterine device (IUD) users and relation to subsequent abortion.

STUDY DESIGN

Our retrospective chart review study included all patients obtaining an abortion from 2003 to 2010 at the primary service provider in the Interior Health Region of British Columbia, tracking each patient for 5 years to detect subsequent abortion. We used descriptive statistics to analyze demographic trends and logistic regression to examine determinants of choosing an IUD and likelihood of subsequent abortion per contraceptive method.

RESULTS

Our study cohort included 5206 patients, 1247 (24.0%) of whom chose an IUD. Patients increased IUD use from 10.14% to 45.74% of the cohort over the study period. Mean age of those choosing an IUD significantly decreased over the study period [30.9±7.3 years in 2003 to 26.2±6.5 years in 2010 (p<.001)]. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with choosing an IUD postabortion were prior delivery [aOR=2.77 (95% CI 2.40-3.20)] and being older than 20 years [20-29 years: AOR=1.87 (1.51-2.32); or 30+ years: AOR=1.96 (1.54-2.50)]. Patients choosing an IUD were less likely to have a subsequent abortion compared to those selecting oral contraceptives [aOR=1.96 (95% CI 1.54-2.52)] or depomedroxyprogesterone acetate [aOR=1.84 (95% CI 1.36-2.49)].

CONCLUSIONS

We found an increasing trend of choosing an IUD after an abortion in our population, especially among youth. Patients who chose an IUD postabortion were less likely to have a subsequent abortion over the next 5 years.

IMPLICATIONS

An important strategy for reducing subsequent abortion is to ensure that those seeking abortion have accurate information on the comparative effectiveness of postabortion contraception methods. Educational efforts, alongside removal of cost and other barriers, will contribute to the prevention of subsequent abortion and improve equitable access to IUDs among the population.

Post-abortion long-acting reversible contraception in a sample of Italian women: intrauterine device versus subdermal implant

Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) represent an especially effective kind of post-abortion contraception. We aimed at assessing satisfaction, discontinuation, efficacy, and tolerability associated with either levonorgestrel intrauterine device (L-IUCD), the copper intrauterine device (C-IUCD) and implant (IMP) after termination of pregnancy (TOP). We recorded baseline data about the patients and performed phone surveys at 3, 6 and 12 months after insertion to assess the bleeding profile. Furthermore, women were inquired about possible adverse events, satisfaction, and discontinuation at 12 months after insertion. LARC continuers (>12 months after TOP) were divided into three groups: L-IUCD (n = 47), C-IUCD (n = 6) and IMP (n = 36). Satisfaction rates among L-IUCD users were higher than among IMP users (100% vs. 72.2%, p < .05). A higher, yet not significant, share of patients decided to withdraw contraception in IMP group (3.6% in IUCD group and 12.2% in IMP group). The bleeding profile was significantly more favorable among L-IUCD users than among IMP users. Finally, the reported rate of treatment-associated adverse events did not differ significantly among the groups. L-IUCD insertion after TOP is associated with higher satisfaction and lower discontinuation rates than IMP. Such pattern could be attributed to a more favorable bleeding profile.

Predicting poor compliance with follow-up and intrauterine contraception services after medical termination of pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Attendance at post-abortion follow-up visits is poor, but little is known about factors affecting it.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the factors associated with non-compliance with post-abortion services and to evaluate differences in rates of attendance and intrauterine device (IUD) insertion according to the type of service provision.

METHODS

605 women undergoing a first trimester medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP) and planning to use intrauterine contraception were randomised into two groups. Women in the intervention group (n=306) were booked to have IUD insertion 1-4 weeks after the MTOP at the hospital providing the abortion, while women in the control group (n=299) were advised to contact their primary healthcare (PHC) centre for follow-up and IUD insertion.

RESULTS

In the intervention group, 21 (6.9%) women failed to attend the follow-up visit, whereas in the control group 67 (22.4%) women did not contact the PHC to schedule a follow-up (p<0.001). In both groups, non-attendance was associated with history of previous pregnancy and abortion. Not having an IUD inserted within 3 months was significantly more common in the control group (73.6% (n=220)) than in the intervention group (9.2% (n=28), p<0.001). In the intervention group, predictive factors for not having an IUD inserted were anxiety, history of pregnancy and abortion. However, we identified no significant predictive factors in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors predicting low compliance with post-MTOP follow-up are few. Comprehensive provision of abortion care and post-abortion services seems beneficial for minimising the loss to follow-up and delay in initiation of effective contraception.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01223521;Results.

Sexual well-being after first trimester termination of pregnancy: Secondary analysis of a randomized contraceptive trial

INTRODUCTION

Although termination of pregnancy is one of the most common procedures conducted worldwide, little is known about sexual well-being after termination of pregnancy. The objective of this study was to assess sexual well-being after termination of pregnancy, and factors affecting it during a 1-year follow up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In total, 748 women requesting first trimester termination of pregnancy and participating in a randomized controlled trial on early provision of intrauterine contraception were provided with questionnaires regarding their sexual life, anxiety, quality of life and contraceptive method used at the time of termination of pregnancy, 3 and 12 months after termination of pregnancy. Sexual well-being was measured by the 9-item McCoy Female Sexuality Questionnaire. Anxiety and quality of life were assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Scale and EuroQoL questionnaire (EQoL).

RESULTS

The McCoy index remained unchanged during the follow up. At all three time-points measured, higher (ie, better) McCoy scores were associated with a lower STAI index (mean difference -2.26 [95% CI -3.23 to -1.29], P < 0.001; -3.76 [95% CI -4.79 to -2.74], P < 0.001; -4.50 [95% CI -5.88 to -3.12], P < 0.001) and being in a relationship (1.16 [95% CI 0.08-2.25], P = 0.023; 1.67 [95% CI 0.43-2.89], P < 0.001; 2.81 [95% CI 1.28-4.34], P < 0.001), and correlated positively with a higher EQoL index (r = 0.20, r = 0.20, r = .27, P < 0.001) and higher frequency of intercourse (r = 0.50, r = 0.46, r = 0.42, P < 0.001). Women using intrauterine contraception had higher McCoy index measurements at 3 months compared with others. There were no significant differences between users of hormonal vs non-hormonal contraceptive methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Sexual well-being does not change significantly after termination of pregnancy. Instead, it is strongly and positively associated with quality of life, relationship status and frequency of intercourse. Anxiety is negatively associated with sexual well-being.

[Post-abortion contraception]

OBJECTIVE

To establish guidelines of the French National College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians about post-abortion contraception.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature about post-abortion contraception was performed on Medline and Cochrane Database between 1978 and March 2016. The guidelines of the French and foreign scientific societies were also consulted.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

After an abortion, if the woman wishes to use a contraception, it should be started as soon as possible because of the very early ovulation resumption. The contraception choice must be done in accordance with the woman's expectations and lifestyle. The contraindications of each contraception must be respected. The long-acting reversible contraception, intra-uterine device (IUD) and implant, could be preferred (grade C) as the efficacy is not dependent on compliance. Thus, they could better prevent repeat abortion (LE3). In case of surgical abortion, IUD should be proposed and inserted immediately after the procedure (grade A), as well as the implant (grade B). In case of medical abortion, the implant can be inserted from the day of mifépristone, the IUD after an ultrasound examination confirming the success of the abortion (no continuing pregnancy or retained sac) (grade C).

A motivational interviewing-based counseling intervention to increase postabortion uptake of contraception: A pilot randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a counseling intervention using the principles of motivational interviewing (MI) would impact uptake of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) after abortion.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing an MI-based contraception counseling intervention to only non-standardized counseling. Sixty women 15-29 years-old were randomized.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

uptake of LARC within four weeks of abortion.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

uptake of any effective contraceptive, contraceptive use three months after abortion and satisfaction with counseling. Bivariate analysis was used to compare outcomes.

RESULTS

In the intervention arm, 65.5% of participants received a long-acting method within four weeks compared to 32.3% in the control arm (p=0.01). Three months after the abortion, differences in LARC use endured (60.0% vs. 30.8%, p=0.05). Uptake and use of any effective method were not statistically different. More women in the intervention arm reported satisfaction with their counseling than women in the control arm (92.0% vs. 65.4%, p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Twice as many women in the MI-based contraception counseling intervention initiated and continued to use LARC compared to women who received only non-standardized counseling.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

A contraception counseling session using the principles and skills of motivational interviewing has the potential to impact LARC use after abortion.

Anxiety and quality of life after first-trimester termination of pregnancy: a prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Possible effects of termination of pregnancy (TOP) on mental health are a matter of debate.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We assessed anxiety and quality of life during a one-year follow up after first-trimester TOP using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Scale and EuroQoL Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D, EQ-VAS) in 742 women participating in a randomized controlled trial on early provision of intrauterine contraception. The measurements were performed before TOP, at 3 months and 1 year after TOP. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, residence in Helsinki, duration of gestation <12 weeks, non-medical indication for TOP, and approval of intrauterine contraception. The trial was registered with Clinical Trials [NCT01223521].

RESULTS

When compared with baseline, the overall anxiety level was significantly lower and quality of life higher at 3 months and at 1 year. Reduction of anxiety and improvement of quality of life was especially evident (p < 0.001) in the 58% of women reporting clinically relevant anxiety at baseline. High levels of anxiety at baseline, history of psychiatric morbidity and smoking predicted significantly greater risk of poorer quality of life and elevated level of anxiety during the follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

TOP is associated with a significant overall reduction of anxiety and an improvement of quality of life among women undergoing it for non-medical indications. High baseline anxiety, history of psychiatric morbidity and smoking are risk factors of persistently high levels of anxiety and poor quality of life after an induced abortion. These data are important when designing and providing post-abortion care.

EDUCATIONAL INEQUALITIES IN REPEAT ABORTION: A LONGITUDINAL REGISTER STUDY IN FINLAND 1975-2010

The proportion of repeat abortions among all abortions has increased over the last decades in Finland. This study examined the association of education with the likelihood of repeat abortion, and the change in this association over time using reliable longitudinal data. A unique set of register data from three birth cohorts were followed from age 20 to 45, including about 22,000 cases of repeat abortion, and analysed using discrete-time event-history models. Low education was found to be associated with a higher likelihood of repeat abortion. Women with low education had abortions sooner after the preceding abortion, and were more often single, younger and had larger families at the time of abortion than more highly educated women. The educational differences were more significant for later than earlier cohorts. The results show a lack of appropriate contraceptive use, possibly due to lack of knowledge of, or access to, services. There is a need to improve access to family planning services, and contraceptives should be provided free of charge. Register data overcome the common problems of under-reporting of abortion and attrition ensuring the results are reliable, unique and of interest internationally.

Comparison of uptake of long-acting reversible contraception after abortion from a hospital or a community sexual and reproductive healthcare setting: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Uptake of the most effective long-acting reversible methods of contraception (LARC) immediately after abortion has been shown to reduce a woman's risk of further abortion. We aimed to compare the uptake of LARC at abortion services from a hospital department of obstetrics and gynaecology and a specialist contraceptive setting of a community sexual and reproductive health (SRH) service within the same city.

METHODS

Retrospective database review of women (n=2473) requesting abortion who were assessed at either a community SRH service or a hospital department of obstetrics and gynaecology, in the same UK city over a period of 1 year. The main outcome measures were immediate post-abortal uptake of LARC from each site.

RESULTS

A higher proportion of women assessed at the SRH service received LARC after abortion [50.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.53%] compared to those attending the hospital site (39.2%; 95% CI 0.36-0.42%; p<0.0001). Amongst women having an outpatient early medical abortion, LARC uptake at the SRH was twice that of the hospital setting (48.4% vs 23.3%; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher uptake of immediate post-abortal LARC was observed amongst women who were assessed at the specialist contraceptive service in the community SRH setting compared to the hospital setting. Further research is required to determine the reasons for these observations since all abortion services should provide the same high-quality contraceptive service to women undergoing abortion.