Are endogenous LH levels during ovarian stimulation for IVF using GnRH analogues associated with the probability of ongoing pregnancy? A systematic review

Low Endogenous LH on the COS Initiation Day of a GnRH-Agonist Regimen Increases the Risk of Early Pregnancy Loss and Adverse ART Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of serum luteinizing hormone (LH) levels on the day of initiation of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) after pituitary suppression on early pregnancy loss and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 9540 normogonadotrophic patients were treated with a GnRH agonist for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Based on the serum concentration of LH on the COS initiation day, patients were divided into low (<1 mIU/mL, n=2838), medium (1-1.49 mIU/mL, n=3357), or high (≥1.5 mIU/mL, n=3345) LH groups and received either fresh embryo transfer (ET) or frozen ET (women with high ovarian response, insufficient endometrial thickness, or requesting frozen ET). A total of 6279 cycles were fresh ET (1960, 2222, and 2097 in the low, medium, and high LH groups, respectively).

INTERVENTIONS

During IVF/ICSI, a GnRH agonist was used to suppress pituitary function in the midluteal phase or follicular phase, and then gonadotropin was used to induce COS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The early pregnancy loss rate (ePLR) and live-birth rate (LBR) for fresh ET, as well as the cumulative ePLR and LBR for the entire ovarian stimulation cycle, were compared.

RESULTS

In the fresh ET cycles, the high, medium and low LH groups had an ePLR of 8.6%, 11.9% and 12.5%, respectively, and LBR of 42.1%, 37.9% and 37.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences in terms of clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), late pregnancy loss rate (lPLR), and ectopic pregnancy rate (EPR) among the three LH groups. For the entire ovarian stimulation cycle, the high LH group had a greater number of retrieved oocytes compared with the low and medium LH groups. Among the groups of high, medium and low LH, the cumulative CPR were 72.8%, 69.8% and 68.8%, respectively, and the cumulative LBR were 63.4%, 60.4% and 58.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the cumulative ePLR, lPLR, or EPR. After multivariable logistic regression, compared with the high LH group, the adjusted odds ratio of early pregnancy loss in the low and medium LH group were 1.429 (1.065-1.919, P = 0.018) and 1.389 (1.041-1.853, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

After pituitary suppression by a GnRH-agonist during IVF, a low LH level (<1.5 mIU/mL) on the COS initiation day was associated with adverse ART outcomes-including fewer oocytes, higher ePLR and lower LBR in fresh ET-and lower cumulative CPR and LBR in the entire ovarian-stimulation cycle. And LH on the COS initiation day was an independent factor affecting ePLR after multivariate regression.

Is there a relationship between luteinizing hormone levels and ART outcome in GnRH antagonist protocols? A retrospective cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential link between serum LH concentrations on the day of oocyte triggering and pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective cross-sectional study, data of women ≤42 years undergoing fresh embryo transfer cycles and who had downregulated with GnRH antagonist protocol in a 12-month period was reviewed. Patients with incomplete hospital records were excluded. Women were divided into four groups based on the percentiles of the serum LH level on the day of oocyte triggering: <1.49 (<25^th percentile), 1.49-2.59 (25-50^th percentile), 2.60-4.60 (50-75^th percentile), and >4.60 IU/L (>75^th percentile). Clinical pregnancy was considered the primary outcome, while chemical pregnancy and implantation rate were the most important secondary outcomes which were compared between the four groups.

RESULTS

Four hundred and nighty-three women of 1003 infertile women, who were initially assessed for eligibility, met the inclusion criteria. Finally, 426 women were analyzed. Levels of progesterone were significantly correlated with the level of LH on the day of trigger in the >4.60 IU/L group (r = 0.20, P = 0.034). Furthermore, the levels of estradiol were significantly correlated with the level of LH on the day of trigger in the <1.49 IU/L (r = 0.21, P = 0.026). The number of retrieved oocytes, 2PNs (two pronucleis), number, and quality of total embryos were similar between groups (P > 0.05). With regard to oocyte maturity rate, fertilization proportion, fertilization rate, chemical pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate, there was no difference between varied LH levels in the four groups (P > 0.05). The only observed difference was the implantation rate that was significantly higher in the 2.60-4.60 IU/L group than the <1.49 IU/L group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our result could not show the potential link between LH concentrations during GnRH antagonist cycles and pregnancy outcomes. However, very low LH levels during ovarian stimulation period may negatively affect the implantation rate.

Low Serum LH Levels During Ovarian Stimulation With GnRH Antagonist Protocol Decrease the Live Birth Rate After Fresh Embryo Transfers but Have No Impact in Freeze-All Cycles

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association between serum LH levels and the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) within one complete cycle, and the impact of serum LH levels on the live birth rate (LBR) after the initial embryo transfer (ET) considering different ET strategies (fresh or freeze-all).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated reproductive center.

PATIENTS

1480 normogonadotrophic women who underwent COS with GnRH antagonist protocol for the first IVF/ICSI attempt.

INTERVENTIONS

The sample was stratified into low and higher LH groups according to serum LH peak levels of <4 (Group A) and ≥4 IU/L (Group B) during COS. Patients were also sub-grouped into conventional fresh/frozen ET cycles and freeze-all cycles.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The LBR after the initial embryo transfer and the CLBR within one complete cycle.

SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The numbers of day-3 high-quality embryos, the numbers of embryos available, and the other pregnancy outcomes after the initial ET.

RESULTS

In the whole cohort, the CLBRs decreased significantly in the low (63.1% vs. 68.3%, P=.034) LH group compared to the higher LH group. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with low LH levels had lower LBR after fresh ET (38.0% vs. 51.5%, P=.005) but comparable LBR after the first frozen-thawed ET (FET) in freeze-all cycles (49.8% vs. 51.8%, P=.517) than patients with higher LH peak levels. Likewise, patients with low LH levels had lower CLBR for conventional fresh/frozen ET cycles (54.8% vs. 66.1%, P=.015) but comparable CLBR for the freeze-all cycles (66.8% vs. 69.2%, P=.414) than those with higher LH levels. Following confounder adjustment, multivariable regression analyses showed that low LH level was an independent risk factor for the CLBR in the whole cohort (odds ratio (OR): 0.756, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.604-0.965, P=.014) and in patients who underwent the conventional ET strategy (OR: 0.596, 95% CI: 0.408-0.917, P=.017). Moreover, the adverse impact of low LH levels on LBRs maintained statistically significant after fresh transfers (OR: 0.532, 95% CI: 0.353-0.800, P=.002) but not after the first FETs in freeze-all cycles (OR: 0.918, 95% CI: 0.711-1.183, P=.508).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with higher LH levels, low LH levels decrease the CLBRs per oocyte retrieval cycle for normogonadotrophic women who underwent COS using GnRH antagonists. This discrepancy may arise due to the significant detrimental effect of low LH levels on the LBRs after fresh embryo transfers.

[Effects of luteinizing hormone supplementation on outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in patients undergoing GnRH-agonist long protocol]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) among patients in different conditions receiving luteinizing hormone supplementation in GnRH-agonist long protocol.

METHODS

Between June, 2010 and December, 2015, 671 IVF-ET cycles with GnRH-agonist long protocol were performed at our center. These cycles were divided into group A with FSH only and group B with FSH and recombinant luteinizing hormone (r-LH) supplementation, and each group was divided into 4 subgroups according to age (<35 or ≥35) and the LH level on the initial day (<1.0 U/L or ≥1.0 U/L). The effects of LH supplementation on the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate were compared among different subgroups.

RESULTS

No statistical significances were found between groups A and B in age, body mass index (BMI), basal FSH, basal LH, basal E2, Gn dosage, Gn day, LH on HCG day, E2 on HCG day, P on HCG day, number of oocytes, fertilization rate, available embryo rate or good quality embryo rate per oocyte, but the endometrium thickness on HCG day differed significantly between the two groups. In women below 35 years of age with a LH level on HCG day over 1.0 U/L, r-LH supplementation resulted in a clinical pregnancy rate of 60%, significantly lower than the rate of 79.55% in women without r-LH supplementation (P<0.05). In women over 35 years with a LH level below 1.0 U/L, r-LH supplementation resulted in an implantation rate of 44.74%, as compared with 24.74% in women without r-LH supplementation (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the long protocol, LH supplementation does not improve the oocyte number, fertilization rate, or good quality embryo per oocyte, and does not bring benefits to women below 35 years with a low LH level (<1.0 U/L) or those over 35 years with normal LH level (≥1.0 U/L) after GnRH-agonist administration. But for women over 35 years with low LH levels, r-LH supplementation may improve the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate of IVF-ET cycles.

Profile of follitropin alpha/lutropin alpha combination for the stimulation of follicular development in women with severe luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone deficiency

A severe gonadotropin deficiency together with chronic estradiol deficiency leading to amenorrhea characterizes patients suffering from hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Administration of both follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) to these patients has been shown to be essential in achieving successful stimulation of follicular development, ovulation, and rescue of fertility. In recent years, the availability of both recombinant FSH (rFSH) and recombinant LH (rLH) has provided a new therapeutic option for the stimulation of follicular growth in hypopituitary–hypogonadotropic women (World Health Organization Group I). In this article, we review the data reported in the literature to highlight the role and the efficacy of using recombinant gonadotropins, rFSH and rLH, in the treatment of women with severe LH/FSH deficiency. Although the studies on this issue are limited and the experiences available in the literature are few due to the small number of such patients, it is clearly evident that the recombinant gonadotropins rFSH and rLH are efficient in treating patients affected by hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. The results observed in the studies reported in this review suggest that recombinant gonadotropins are able to induce proper follicular growth, oocyte maturation, and eventually pregnancy in this group of women. Moreover, the clinical use of recombinant gonadotropins in this type of patients has given more insight into some endocrinological aspects of ovarian function that have not yet been fully understood.

Luteinizing hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin: a review of their varied clinical applications in assisted reproductive technology

Luteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) are often viewed as interchangeable from a functional standpoint because they are highly homologous members of the same glycoprotein hormone family that share a common α-subunit and receptor. However, technological advances yielding highly purified and recombinant gonadotropin preparations have revealed that LH and hCG fulfill different roles, both endogenously and when administered exogenously. These differences are becoming more apparent as the individual hormones are incorporated into the treatment of infertility - a therapeutic area that is continually advancing with the introduction of new agents and emerging clinical trial data. This review examines the unique attributes of LH and hCG that drive their distinctive applications in the treatment of female infertility.

Individualized Treatment from Theory to Practice: The Private Case of Adding LH during GnRH Antagonist-based Stimulation Protocol

The study evaluated the proportion of patients whose pituitary glands respond with a sharp decrease in luteinizing hormone (LH) levels when exposed to a conventional dose of 0.25 mg gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist in a prospective, single-center, non-randomized, proof-of-concept study. Fifty women eligible for in vitro fertilization (IVF) received recFSH (Gonal-F) from day 2 or 3 of menstrual period. Basal estradiol, progesterone, and LH were measured on the same day and 4–5 days later—immediately before GnRH antagonist 0.25 mg administration, and 24 hours after its administration. Responders were defined as “normal” if 24 hours after the first GnRH antagonist injection, LH level was ≥50% of the pre-injection level and as “over-suppressed” if it was <50% of the pre-injection level. Twelve patients (26% of the total) were “over-suppressed” with a mean LH level of 37% of the level 24 hours earlier. These patients also demonstrated a significant decrease in estradiol rise during the first 24 hours after initial antagonist administration. This effect was reversed for the rest of the stimulation period during which recLH (Luveris, 150 IU/day) was added to the “over-suppressed.” If proven advantageous in terms of pregnancy rate, this approach to individualized treatment would be easy to implement. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT01936077.

Prognostic models for high and low ovarian responses in controlled ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol

STUDY QUESTION

Can predictors of low and high ovarian responses be identified in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in a GnRH antagonist protocol?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Common prognostic factors for high and low ovarian responses were female age, antral follicle count (AFC) and basal serum FSH and LH.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Predictors of ovarian response have been identified in GnRH agonist protocols. With the introduction of GnRH antagonists to prevent premature LH rises during COS, and the gradual shift in use of long GnRH agonist to short GnRH antagonist protocols, there is a need for data on the predictability of ovarian response in GnRH antagonist cycles.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A retrospective analysis of data from the Engage trial and validation with the Xpect trial. Prognostic models were constructed for high (>18 oocytes retrieved) and low (<6 oocytes retrieved) ovarian response. Model building was based on the recombinant FSH (rFSH) arm (n = 747) of the Engage trial. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed in a stepwise fashion (P < 0.15 for entry). Validation based on calibration was performed in patients with equivalent treatment (n = 199) in the Xpect trial.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Infertile women with an indication for COS prior to IVF. The Engage and Xpect trials included patients of similar ethnic origins from North America and Europe who had regular menstrual cycles. The main causes of infertility were male factor, tubal factor and endometriosis.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In the Engage trial, 18.3% of patients had a high and 12.7% had a low ovarian response. Age, AFC, serum FSH and serum LH at stimulation Day 1 were prognostic for both high and low ovarian responses. Higher AFC and LH were associated with an increased chance of high ovarian response. Older age and higher FSH correlated with an increased chance of low ovarian response. Region (North America/Europe) and BMI were prognostic for high ovarian response, and serum estradiol at stimulation Day 1 was associated with low ovarian response. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for the model for a high ovarian response was 0.82. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 and 0.73; positive and negative predictive values were 0.40 and 0.95, respectively. The AUC for the model for a low ovarian response was 0.80. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 and 0.73, respectively; positive and negative predictive values were 0.29 and 0.96, respectively. In Xpect, 19.1% of patients were high ovarian responders and 16.1% were low ovarian responders. The slope of the calibration line was 0.81 and 1.35 for high and low ovarian responses, respectively, both not statistically different from 1.0. In summary, common prognostic factors for high and low ovarian responses were female age, AFC and basal serum FSH and LH. Simple multivariable models are presented that are able to predict both a too low or too high ovarian response in patients treated with a GnRH antagonist protocol and daily rFSH.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Anti-Müllerian hormone was not included in the prediction modelling.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The findings will help with the identification of patients at risk of a too high or too low ovarian response and individualization of COS treatment.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

Financial support for this study and the editorial work was provided by Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. (MSD), a subsidiary of Merck & Co. Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA. F.J.B. received a grant from CVZ to his institution; P.J.M.V. and H.W. are employees of MSD, and B.M.J.L.M. was an employee of MSD at the time of development of this manuscript.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT 00696800 and NCT00778999.

Early initiation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist treatment results in a more stable endocrine milieu during the mid- and late-follicular phases: a randomized controlled trial comparing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist initiation on cycle day 2 or 6

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of initiating GnRH antagonist (GnRH-a) on cycle day (CD) 2 vs. CD 6 on LH, E₂, and P levels in the mid and late follicular phases.

DESIGN

Nested study within a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Reproductive medicine center in an university hospital.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred sixty patients undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

INTERVENTION(S)

Recombinant FSH (150-225 IU) was administered daily from CD 2 onward. The study group (CD 2) started GnRH-a cotreatment on CD 2, whereas the control group (CD 6) started on CD 6.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The follicular phase endocrine profile.

RESULT(S)

The LH levels on CD 6 were lower in the CD 2 group (0.6 ± 0.4 vs. 1.9 ± 1.4 IU/L). The CD 2 group demonstrated both lower E₂ levels on CD 6 (520.1 ± 429.6 pmol/L vs. 1,071.7 ± 654.2 pmol/L) and on the day of hCG administration (3,341.4 ± 1,535.3 pmol/L vs. 4,573.2 ± 2,445.4 pmol/L). The P levels did not differ on CD 6 or on the day of hCG administration.

CONCLUSION(S)

Early initiation of GnRH-a cotreatment results in a more stable endocrine profile, with more physiological levels of E2 and LH during the follicular phase. The effect on clinical outcomes must be established in larger trials.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00866034.

In vitro fertilization stimulation protocol for normal responder patients

The aim of this prospective observational study is to determine the different outcomes of IVF/ICSI treatments after using antagonists or agonists of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in normal responder patients. Two hundred forty-seven patients undergoing IVF treatment at the Centre of Reproductive Medicine, Rome (CERMER), from January 2005 to December 2008, were included in the study. Patients were stimulated either with a standard long protocol with GnRH agonists (n = 156) or with GnRH antagonists (n = 91). The use of GnRH antagonists resulted in a significant reduction in the duration of the stimulation (Agonist Group 14.10 ± 2.25 vs Antagonist Group 11.34 ± 2.11; p < 0.001) and in the amount of gonadotrophin (IU of r-FSH) needed (Agonist Group 1878 ± 1109 vs Antagonist Group 1331 ± 1049; p = 0.0014). Moreover a lower number of cycles were cancelled with the antagonist protocol (4.39 vs 6.41%). The GnRH antagonist protocol, when compared to the GnRH agonist one, is associated with a similar clinical pregnancy rate, similar implantation rate, significantly lower gonadotrophin requirement and shorter duration of stimulation. For this reason, GnRH antagonists might be a good treatment even for normal responder patients undergoing IVF.

Live-birth rates after HP-hMG stimulation in the long GnRH agonist protocol: association with mid-follicular hCG and progesterone concentrations, but not with LH concentrations

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of endogenous and exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) activity on treatment outcome, when taking into consideration potential confounding variables. Data were derived from IVF patients (n = 358) stimulated with highly purified menotrophin (HP-hMG) in a long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol. Simple retrospective logistic regression analysis showed that the mid-follicular exogenous concentrations of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) (p = 0.027), provided by the HP-hMG preparation, and female age (p = 0.009) were significantly associated with live-birth rate, while the mid-follicular progesterone concentration (p = 0.075), the estradiol concentration on last stimulation day (p = 0.075) and number of embryos transferred (p = 0.071) were borderline significant. Endogenous LH was not associated with live-birth rate; neither at start of stimulation (p = 0.123), nor in the mid-follicular phase (p = 0.933) or on the last day of stimulation (p = 0.589). In the multiple regression analysis of life birth, mid-follicular hCG (p = 0.016) was identified as a positive predictor, and age (p = 0.004) and mid-follicular progesterone (p = 0.029) as negative predictors. In conclusion, mid-follicular concentrations of exogenous hCG and progesterone, but not endogenous LH, are associated with live-birth rate in IVF patients treated with HP-hMG in a long GnRH agonist cycle.

Endocrinological insights into different in vitro fertilization treatment aspects

The science of reproductive endocrinology/in vitro fertilization (IVF) has moved forward considerably since the first IVF baby was born in 1978. IVF was originally indicated for women with tubal factor infertility, but it has now become the treatment for couples with unexplained subfertility, male subfertility, cervical factor, failed ovulation induction, endometriosis or unilateral tubal pathology. IVF was initially performed with the single dominant ovarian follicle produced during a spontaneous menstrual cycle. This was very inefficient and pregnancy rates were dismal. Consequently, superovulation protocols using parenteral gonadotrophins to induce maturation of multiple follicles were soon adopted worldwide. In addition, any supernumerary embryos remaining after embryo transfer may be cryopreserved for future embryo transfers without the need for another fresh IVF cycle. A greater understanding of IVF endocrinology has led to improved IVF pregnancy outcomes and satisfaction for the anxious parents. However, with the greater success of IVF treatment, new complications associated with the treatment arise, namely the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Ovarian hyperstimulation can be associated with severe morbidity and may be even fatal. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is an iatrogenic condition secondary to medical stimulation of the ovary, and was virtually unknown until IVF treatment was initiated. This article will discuss the recent developments in IVF treatment endocrinology and protocols, as well as prevention/treatment of its complications.

Recombinant human LH supplementation versus supplementation with urinary hCG-based LH activity during controlled ovarian stimulation in the long GnRH-agonist protocol: a matched case-control study

An observational, matched, case-control study was carried out to compare the efficacy of recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hLH) supplementation with that of urinary human menopausal gonadotrophin (u-hMG)-based LH activity during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for assisted reproductive technology (ART) using a long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist protocol. A total of 4719 women, 1573 per group, matched by age, body mass index, indication and number of previous ART cycles, were treated with either recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) and r-hLH in a fixed 2:1 ratio or u-hMG, either alone or in combination with r-hFSH, after down-regulation in a long GnRH-agonist protocol. Compared with the two u-hMG groups (u-hMG alone or in combination with r-hFSH, respectively), r-hFSH consumption was significantly lower (p < 0.001; p < 0.001), and pregnancy rates per cycle (p = 0.006; p = 0.022) and per embryo transfer (p = 0.025; p = 0.008), and implantation rate per embryo transferred (p < 0.001; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the group treated with the fixed combination of r-hFSH and r-hLH. In COS protocols with r-hFSH, supplementation with r-hLH appears to be more effective than supplementation with u-hMG using the long GnRH-agonist protocol for ART.

LH receptor gene expression in cumulus cells in women entering an ART program

PURPOSE

Luteinizing hormone (LH) exerts its actions through its receptor (LHR), which is mainly expressed in theca cells and to a lesser extent in oocytes, granulosa and cumulus cells. The aim of the present study was the investigation of a possible correlation between LHR gene and LHR splice variants expression in cumulus cells and ovarian response as well as ART outcome.

METHODS

Forty patients undergoing ICSI treatment for male factor infertility underwent a long luteal GnRH-agonist downregulation protocol with a fixed 5-day rLH pre-treatment prior to rFSH stimulation and samples of cumulus cells were collected on the day of egg collection. RNA extraction and cDNA preparation was followed by LHR gene expression investigation through real-time PCR. Furthermore, cumulus cells were investigated for the detection of LHR splice variants using reverse transcription PCR.

RESULTS

Concerning LHR expression in cumulus cells, a statistically significant negative association was observed with the duration of ovarian stimulation (odds ratio = 0.23, p = 0.012). Interestingly, 6 over 7 women who fell pregnant expressed at least two specific types of LHR splice variants (735 bp, 621 bp), while only 1 out of 19 women that did not express any splice variant achieved a pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Consequently, the present study provide a step towards a new role of LHR gene expression profiling as a biomarker in the prediction of ovarian response at least in terms of duration of stimulation and also a tentative role of LHR splice variants expression in the prediction of pregnancy success.

Low-dose HCG may improve pregnancy rates and lower OHSS in antagonist cycles: a meta-analysis

Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) may substitute FSH to complete follicular growth in IVF cycles. This may be useful in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Relevant studies were identified on Medline. To evaluate outcomes, a meta-analysis of low-dose HCG-supplemented IVF cycles versus non-supplemented ones was performed with data from 435 patients undergoing IVF who were administered low-dose HCG in various agonist and antagonist protocols and from 597 conservatively treated patients who served, as control subjects. Using these published data, a decision analysis evaluated four different management strategies. Effectiveness and economic outcomes were assessed by FSH consumption, clinical pregnancy and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Clinical pregnancy and ovarian hyperstimulation were the main outcome measures. Nine trials published in 2002-2007 were included. From the prospective studies, in the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist group, a trend for significance in clinical pregnancy rate was evident (odds ratio [OR], 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-2.42). Ovarian hyperstimulation was less significant in the antagonist low-dose HCG protocol compared with the non-supplemented agonist protocol (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.09-0.96). Less FSH was consumed in the low-dose HCG group but this difference was not statistically significant. Low-dose HCG supplementation may improve pregnancy rates in antagonist protocols. Overall, low-dose HCG-supplemented protocols are a cost-effective strategy.

Lutropin alpha, recombinant human luteinizing hormone, for the stimulation of follicular development in profoundly LH-deficient hypogonadotropic hypogonadal women: a review

Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism is defined as a medical condition with low or undetectable gonadotropin secretion, associated with a complete arrest of follicular growth and very low estradiol. The main cause can be traced back to an irregular or absent hypothalamic GnRH secretion, whereas only a minority suffers from a pituitary disorder. The choice of treatment to reverse this situation is a pulsatile GnRH application or a direct ovarian stimulation using gonadotropin injections. The goal is to achieve a proper ovarian function in these cases for a short time to allow ovulation and chance of pregnancy. Since the pulsatile GnRH treatment lost its former importance, several gonadotropins are in use to stimulate follicular growth, such as urine-derived human menopausal gonadotropin, highly purified follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) or recombinant FSH, all with different success. The introduction of recombinant luteinizing hormone (LH) and FSH provided an opportunity to investigate the distinct influences of LH and FSH alone and in combination on follicular growth in monofollicular ovulation induction cycles, and additionally on oocyte maturation, fertilization competence of the oocyte and embryo quality in downregulated IVF patients. Whereas FSH was known to be indispensable for normal follicular growth, the role of LH remained questionable. Downregulated IVF patients with this short-term gonadotropin depletion displayed no advance in stimulation success with the use of recombinant LH. Patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism undergoing monofollicular stimulation for ovulation induction showed clearly a specific role and need for both hormones in normal follicular growth. Therefore, a combined stimulation with FSH and LH seems to be the best treatment choice. In the first half of the stimulation cycle the FSH dosage should exceed that of LH by 2:1, with an inverse ratio for the second half.

Effects of gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues on human endometrial stromal cells and embryo invasion in vitro

BACKGROUND

Gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues are widely used in IVF programmes as a method of suppressing the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge prior to ovarian stimulation, but their roles outside the pituitary remain relatively unknown. A 2002 Cochrane review (Al-Inany et al. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted conception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;3:CD001750) described lower pregnancy rates in women administered with GnRH antagonist, compared with those using an agonist, as part of an IVF programme, despite the fact that GnRH antagonist is a more effective repressor of LH. This study aimed to analyse the in-vitro effects of GnRH analogues on the decidualizing endometrium, blastocyst invasion and GnRH receptor expression in fertile women.

METHODS

We analysed the in-vitro decidualization capacity of endometrial stromal cells, derived from fertile women during the implantation window, in the presence of GnRH analogues. The influence of GnRH analogues on GnRH receptor expression and blastocyst invasion was assessed by in-vitro assays of biomedical marker secretion, immunoblots and blastocyst attachment to the stromal extracellular matrix.

RESULTS

We demonstrate that, at the concentrations and time periods used, GnRH analogues did not significantly influence the extent of decidualization of endometrial stromal cells. In addition, no adverse effect of GnRH analogues was seen on human blastocyst invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that GnRH analogues affect neither the capacity of the endometrium to support invasion nor the invasive potential of the blastocyst in the early stages of implantation.

The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Milder ovarian stimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization (IVF) are being developed to minimize adverse effects. Mild stimulation regimens result in a decreased number of oocytes at retrieval. After conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF, a low number of oocytes are believed to represent poor ovarian reserve resulting in reduced success rates. Recent studies suggest that a similar response following mild stimulation is associated with better outcomes.

METHODS

This review investigates whether the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation is associated with impaired implantation rates. Three randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of the mild ovarian stimulation regimen (involving midfollicular phase initiation of FSH and GnRH co-treatment) for IVF with a conventional long GnRH agonist co-treatment stimulation protocol could be identified by means of a systematic literature search.

RESULTS

These studies comprised a total of 592 first treatment cycles. Individual patient data analysis showed that the mild stimulation protocol results in a significant reduction of retrieved oocytes compared with conventional ovarian stimulation (median 6 versus 9, respectively, P < 0.001). Optimal embryo implantation rates were observed with 5 oocytes retrieved following mild stimulation (31%) versus 10 oocytes following conventional stimulation (29%) (P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal number of retrieved oocytes depends on the ovarian stimulation regimen. After mild ovarian stimulation, a modest number of oocytes is associated with optimal implantation rates and does not reflect a poor ovarian response. Therefore, the fear of reducing the number of oocytes retrieved following mild ovarian stimulation appears to be unjustified.

The ratio of late-follicular to mid-follicular phase LH concentrations efficiently predicts ART outcomes in women undergoing ART treatment with GnRH-agonist long protocol and stimulation with recombinant FSH

PURPOSE

To establish an index to predict ART outcomes and to identify infertile patients who need LH supplementation during ovarian stimulation.

METHODS

Serum LH concentrations were measured during the mid- and late-follicular phase in 86 normogonadotropic infertile patients who underwent ART treatment using GnRH-agonist long protocol with recombinant-FSH. The relationships between serum LH concentrations at both time points and ART outcomes were retrospectively analyzed, and the relationships between the ratio of late-follicular to mid-follicular LH concentrations and ART outcomes were also evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant correlations between the mid- or late-follicular LH concentrations and ART outcomes. The ratio of late-follicular to mid-follicular LH concentrations <1.0 was considered the relatively LH decreased group (RD group) and ratio >or= 1.0 was considered the relatively LH increased group (RI group). The number of usable embryos in RD group was similar to that in RI group, but the pregnancy and implantation rates in the RD group (9.7% and 5.8%) were significantly lower than those in the RI group (31.1% and 17.2%; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Relatively decreased LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation using GnRH-agonist long protocol with rec-FSH had a negative effect on ART outcomes. Therefore, the ratio of mid- to late-follicular phase LH concentrations is suggested to be an efficient index to identify patients who might benefit from LH supplementation.

Change, change, change: hormonal actions depend on changes in blood levels

The main hypothesis outlined in this communication is that changes in hormonal levels are of utmost importance in the female reproductive system physiology. Hormone measurements must be assessed in the context of time and change. We hypothesize that changes in hormone concentrations carry significant biological messages, much more than a given level at a given time point and if proved, this theory could give rise to better approaches to treatment, and risk assessment.

Predictors of ovarian response: progress towards individualized treatment in ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation

Ovarian stimulation is applied in the clinic to restore mono-ovulatory cycles in anovulatory women (ovulation induction) or to induce the development of multiple dominant follicles for assisted reproduction. Ovarian response is the endocrine and follicular reaction of the ovaries to stimulation. Achieving an appropriate ovarian response to anti-estrogens or exogenous gonadotrophins is central to ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation protocols. However, achieving an adequate response, without cycle cancellation or adverse events related to under- or over-stimulation, is complicated by high intra- and inter-individual variability. To predict each patient's ovarian response to medication for ovarian stimulation and to individualize the starting dose of exogenous gonadotrophin or the need for exogenous luteinizing hormone, various clinical, endocrine, ovarian ultrasonographic and genetic characteristics have been explored. Some of these features have been incorporated into prediction models. In this review, the methodology behind predictive factors and prediction models and their potential clinical applicability across ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation are explored.

Does measuring early basal serum follicular luteinising [correction of lutinising] hormone assist in predicting in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome?

BACKGROUND

The aim was to examine the correlation of early follicular serum lutinising hormone (LH) and the clinical outcome of assisted reproduction technique (ART).

METHODS

An observational study included 1333 consecutive women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). 964 women were having their first cycle of ART. Data were entered prospectively. All women had serum LH measured in the 6 months before the index cycle studied. No repeat cycles were included. The main outcomes measured were clinical pregnancy (CP) and live birth (LB) correlation to serum LH. Forward multivariate stepwise regression analysis was applied, and other statistical tests were used as appropriate.

RESULTS

There was non significant correlation between basal serum LH and CP and LB in the polycystic ovary syndrome group (R2 = 0.02, F = 1.7 and P = 0.76) (R2 = 0.01, F = 2.6 and P = 0.77) respectively after adjusting for age, BMI, day of oocyte retrieval, starting dose, total dose of stimulation, type of gonadotrophin used, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate and number of embryos transferred. Other aetiological causes group there was similarly non significant correlation between basal serum LH and CP (R2 = 0.05, F = 13.1 and P = 0.66), nor for LB (R2 = 0.007, F = 4.5 and P = 0.9).

CONCLUSION

Early follicular serum LH measurements in the 6 months before IVF/ICSI treatment cycle did not correlate with the clinical pregnancy or the live birth rate.

Among patients treated with FSH and GnRH analogues for in vitro fertilization, is the addition of recombinant LH associated with the probability of live birth? A systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess whether the addition of recombinant luteinizing hormone (LH) increases live birth rate, among patients treated with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) answering the research question that contained sufficient information to allow ascertainment of whether randomization was true and whether equality was present between the groups compared, regarding baseline demographic characteristics, gonadotrophin stimulation protocol, number of embryos transferred and luteal phase support administered. A literature search identified seven RCTs (701 patients) that provided the information of interest, among which five reported agonist and two antagonist cycles. The reported outcome measure, clinical pregnancy, was converted to live birth using published data in one study. No significant difference in the probability of live birth was present with or without rLH addition to FSH (odds ratio [OR]: 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-1.31; P = 0.65). This finding remained stable in subgroup analyses that ordered the studies by dose of rLH added, the type of analogue used to inhibit premature LH surge, the time rLH was added during the follicular phase, the age of patients analysed, the presence of allocation concealment and by the way the information on live birth was retrieved. In conclusion, the available evidence does not support the hypothesis that the addition of recombinant LH increases the live birth rate in patients treated with FSH and GnRH analogues for IVF.

High-dose recombinant LH add-back strategy using high-dose GnRH antagonist is an innovative protocol compared with standard GnRH antagonist

High daily doses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists during the follicular phase of ovarian stimulation were associated with low implantation rates. To test if this occurred because of profound pituitary suppression, the pituitary response was suppressed with a high-dose GnRH antagonist and recombinant LH (rLH) was added back to correct the implantation rate. An open-label, randomized, controlled, prospective clinical study in 60 patients undergoing IVF was performed. GnRH antagonist was initiated on day 6 of stimulation (2 mg/day) together with 375 IU rLH, and maintained until the day of HCG administration. Controls received 0.25 mg/day GnRH antagonist. Fluctuating LH concentrations were present on days 3 and 6 in both groups. This strong fluctuation continued on day 8 and on the day of HCG administration in the control (low-dose) group, where 30% of patients had LH concentrations <1 IU/l on the HCG day. The study (high-dose) group showed stable LH concentrations on day 8 and on the HCG day, with no LH surges. No clinical differences were found between groups. The LH add-back strategy (375 IU/day) rescued the adverse effects that high doses of GnRH imposed on implantation. These results suggest that rLH should be considered during ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist.

Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation to recombinant follicle-stimulation hormone during induced ovarian stimulation in the GnRH-agonist protocol: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

to compare the efficacy of recombinant LH supplementation for controlled ovarian stimulation in recombinant FSH and GnRH-agonist protocol.

METHODS

Search strategies included on-line surveys of databases. The fixed effects model was used for odds ratio and effect size (weighted mean difference). Four trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

a fewer days of stimulation (p<0.0001), a fewer total amount of r-FSH administered (p<0.0001) and a higher serum estradiol levels on the day of hCG administration (p<0.0001) were observed for the r-LH supplementation protocol. However, differences were not observed in number of oocyte retrieved, number of mature oocytes, clinical pregnancy per oocyte retrieval, implantation and miscarriage rates.

CONCLUSIONS

more randomized controlled trials are necessary before evidence-based recommendations regarding exogenous LH supplementation in ovarian stimulation protocols with FSH and GnRH-agonist for assisted reproduction treatment can be provided.

In-vitro maturation of oocytes: biological aspects

Natural cycle and in-vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes are becoming interesting alternatives to classical assisted reproduction technology approaches for patients, especially in those at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome or with poor ovarian reserve. More than for their clinical and biological indications, natural cycle and IVM of oocytes can also be considered as good social and economic alternatives to the classical IVF treatment, based on their financial cost-effectiveness with exclusion of expensive medications. To be successful, IVM must entail both nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation, and its maturation and success rates are affected by the number of collected cumulus layers, the degree of atresia and the maturation rate between 24 and 48 h. Endogenous regulation of oocyte maturation is a complex sequence of events regulated by endocrine parameters, oocyte/follicular cross-talk, and intra-oocyte kinase/phosphatase interactions. This complex process requires a better definition of each contributing factor affecting oocyte development and the resulting embryo quality. The clinical aspects of IVM have been documented earlier; the present paper will mainly focus on the biological aspect of oocyte maturation in vitro and the quality of derived embryos.

LH in the follicular phase: neither too high nor too low

The role of LH in the natural menstrual cycle is not disputed. However, there are a variety of opinions regarding the potential role of exogenous LH in ovulation induction and whether it is actually needed. Recent years have seen renewed interest in this issue for several reasons. First, ovulation-inducing drugs are increasingly being administered to normally ovulating women. Second, recombinant human FSH products completely devoid of LH activity are now available. Third, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues (agonists and antagonists) prevent the untimely LH surge but also suppress endogenous LH activity during the follicular phase. This review analyses whether or not all patients need LH for follicular growth stimulation and new opportunities for improved treatment as a result of the availability of recombinant human LH both in patients with ovulatory disorders (World Health Organization (WHO) groups I and II anovulatory patients) and those undergoing multiple follicular development for assisted reproduction.

The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization

To allow selection of embryos for transfer after in vitro fertilization, ovarian stimulation is usually carried out with exogenous gonadotropins. To compensate for changes induced by stimulation, GnRH analog cotreatment, oral contraceptive pretreatment, late follicular phase human chorionic gonadotropin, and luteal phase progesterone supplementation are usually added. These approaches render ovarian stimulation complex and costly. The stimulation of multiple follicular development disrupts the physiology of follicular development, with consequences for the oocyte, embryo, and endometrium. In recent years, recombinant gonadotropin preparations have become available, and novel stimulation protocols with less detrimental effects have been developed. In this article, the scientific background to current approaches to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization is reviewed. After a brief discussion of the relevant aspect of ovarian physiology, the development, application, and consequences of ovarian stimulation strategies are reviewed in detail.

Role of LH in ovarian stimulation: considerations

The role of LH in ovarian stimulation continues to be controversial. Most observational studies on both gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist protocols failed to show an effect on ongoing pregnancy likelihood of punctually measured 'low' or 'high' endogenous LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation. As yet, it is still unknown whether individual patients with strongly suppressed levels of immunoreactive LH would actually benefit from additional LH administration. This can only be explored by means of interventional trials. Most trials on LH supplementation in general populations in both GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist protocols have not found a benefit of LH supplementation, although it has been indicated that some subgroups, such as older age patients, or patients with a low ovarian response might benefit from LH. These concepts need to be explored further before recommendations can be given as to in who, in what protocol, at what time point and in what doses LH should be supplemented.