1
|
Chen Y, Li Y, Su H, Lyu G. Comparison of the value of the GI-RADS and ADNEX models in the diagnosis of adnexal tumors by junior physicians. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1435636. [PMID: 39220643 PMCID: PMC11361981 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1435636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare the diagnostic effectiveness of the Gynecologic Imaging Reporting and Data System (GI-RADS) and Neoplasias in the Adnexa (ADNEX) model for the diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors by junior physicians. Methods The sonographic data of 634 patients with ovarian tumors confirmed by pathology in our hospital over 4 years were analyzed retrospectively by junior doctors. The diagnostic efficacy of the GI-RADS and ADNEX models was compared based on pathology. Results (1) Regarding the diagnostic efficacy of the GI-RADS and ADNEX models, the sensitivity was 90.15% and 84.85%, the specificity was 87.65% and 85.86%, the accuracy rates were 88.17% and 85.65%, and the Youden Indices were 0.778 and 0.707, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.924 (95% CI: 0.900-0.943) and 0.933 (95% CI: 0.911-0.951), respectively. The GI-RADS classification was equivalent to that of the ADNEX model in the diagnosis of adnexal tumors (P>0.05). These findings were highly consistent with the pathological results (Kappa values were 0.684 and 0.691, respectively). (2) When differentiating between different pathological types of adnexal tumors, the ADNEX model had the best diagnostic value for distinguishing between benign tumors and stage II-IV ovarian cancer (AUC=0.990, 95% CI: 0.978-0.997). Conclusions (1) The diagnostic efficacy of the GI-RADS and ADNEX models in the diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors by junior physicians is excellent and comparable. (2) The ADNEX model shows good value for differentiating ovarian tumors of different pathological types by junior physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongjian Chen
- Department of Ultrasound, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Yanru Li
- Department of Ultrasound, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Huiling Su
- Department of Ultrasound, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Guorong Lyu
- Department of Ultrasound, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
- School of Clinical Medicine, Quanzhou Medical College, Quanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bentestuen M, Ladekarl M, Knudsen A, Zacho HD. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical value of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT for staging patients with ovarian cancer: study protocol for a prospective clinical trial. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:699. [PMID: 38849741 PMCID: PMC11157941 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12461-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is recommended during diagnostic work-up for ovarian cancer; however, [18F]FDG PET has several inherent limitations. The novel oncologic PET-tracer fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) has demonstrated promising results in multiple cancer types, including ovarian cancer, and could overcome the limitations of [18F]FDG PET; however, high-quality clinical studies are lacking. The primary objective of the present study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT in ovarian cancer patients and to investigate how this potential difference impacts staging and patient management. METHODS AND DESIGN Fifty consecutive ovarian cancer patients will be recruited from Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark. This study will be a single-center, prospective, exploratory clinical trial that adheres to the standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD). This study will be conducted under continuous Good Clinical Practice monitoring. The eligibility criteria for patients are as follows: (1) biopsy verified newly diagnosed ovarian cancer or a high risk of ovarian cancer and referred for primary staging with [18F]FDG PET/CT; and (2) resectable disease, i.e., candidate for primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. All recruited study subjects will undergo [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT at primary staging, before primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Group A + B), in addition to conventional imaging (including [18F]FDG PET/CT). Study subjects in Group B will undergo an additional [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT following neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to interval debulking surgery. The results of the study-related [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CTs will be blinded, and treatment allocation will be based on common clinical practice in accordance with current guidelines. The histopathology of surgical specimens will serve as a reference standard. A recruitment period of 2 years is estimated; the trial is currently recruiting. DISCUSSION To our knowledge, this trial represents the largest, most extensive, and most meticulous prospective FAPI PET study conducted in patients with ovarian cancer thus far. This study aims to obtain a reliable estimation of the diagnostic accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, shed light on the clinical importance of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, and examine the potential applicability of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT for evaluating chemotherapy response. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05903807, 2nd June 2023; and euclinicaltrials.eu EU CT Number: 2023-505938-98-00, authorized 11th September 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morten Bentestuen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18- 22, Aalborg, DK-9000, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Sdr. Skovvej 11, Aalborg, DK-9000, Denmark.
| | - Morten Ladekarl
- Department of Oncology and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, Aalborg, DK- 9000, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Sdr. Skovvej 11, Aalborg, DK-9000, Denmark
| | - Aage Knudsen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aalborg University Hospital, Reberbansgade 15, Aalborg, DK-9000, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Sdr. Skovvej 11, Aalborg, DK-9000, Denmark
| | - Helle D Zacho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18- 22, Aalborg, DK-9000, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Sdr. Skovvej 11, Aalborg, DK-9000, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bhadra M, Sachan M, Nara S. Current strategies for early epithelial ovarian cancer detection using miRNA as a potential tool. Front Mol Biosci 2024; 11:1361601. [PMID: 38690293 PMCID: PMC11058280 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1361601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is one of the most aggressive and significant malignant tumor forms in the female reproductive system. It is the leading cause of death among gynecological cancers owing to its metastasis. Since its preliminary disease symptoms are lacking, it is imperative to develop early diagnostic biomarkers to aid in treatment optimization and personalization. In this vein, microRNAs, which are short sequence non-coding molecules, displayed great potential as highly specific and sensitive biomarker. miRNAs have been extensively advocated and proven to serve an instrumental part in the clinical management of cancer, especially ovarian cancer, by promoting the cancer cell progression, invasion, delayed apoptosis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, metastasis of cancer cells, chemosensitivity and resistance and disease therapy. Here, we cover our present comprehension of the most up-to-date microRNA-based approaches to detect ovarian cancer, as well as current diagnostic and treatment strategies, the role of microRNAs as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, and their significance in ovarian cancer progression, prognosis, and therapy.
Collapse
|
4
|
Landolfo C, Ceusters J, Valentin L, Froyman W, Van Gorp T, Heremans R, Baert T, Wouters R, Vankerckhoven A, Van Rompuy AS, Billen J, Moro F, Mascilini F, Neumann A, Van Holsbeke C, Chiappa V, Bourne T, Fischerova D, Testa A, Coosemans A, Timmerman D, Van Calster B. Comparison of the ADNEX and ROMA risk prediction models for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a multicentre external validation in patients who underwent surgery. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:934-940. [PMID: 38243011 PMCID: PMC10951363 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02578-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several diagnostic prediction models to help clinicians discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses are available. This study is a head-to-head comparison of the performance of the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model with that of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA). METHODS This is a retrospective study based on prospectively included consecutive women with an adnexal tumour scheduled for surgery at five oncology centres and one non-oncology centre in four countries between 2015 and 2019. The reference standard was histology. Model performance for ADNEX and ROMA was evaluated regarding discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. RESULTS The primary analysis included 894 patients, of whom 434 (49%) had a malignant tumour. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.95) for ADNEX with CA125, 0.90 (0.84-0.94) for ADNEX without CA125, and 0.85 (0.80-0.89) for ROMA. ROMA, and to a lesser extent ADNEX, underestimated the risk of malignancy. Clinical utility was highest for ADNEX. ROMA had no clinical utility at decision thresholds <27%. CONCLUSIONS ADNEX had better ability to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal tumours and higher clinical utility than ROMA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov NCT01698632 and NCT02847832.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Landolfo
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Jolien Ceusters
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lil Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Wouter Froyman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Toon Van Gorp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Gynaecological Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ruben Heremans
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thaïs Baert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Gynaecological Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roxanne Wouters
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Oncoinvent AS, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ann Vankerckhoven
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Jaak Billen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Francesca Moro
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Floriana Mascilini
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Adam Neumann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Valentina Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Tom Bourne
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Daniela Fischerova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Antonia Testa
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Leuven Unit for Health Technology Assessment Research (LUHTAR), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu Y, Miao K, Wang T, Xu C, Yao J, Dong X. Prediction model of adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1284495. [PMID: 38143444 PMCID: PMC10740199 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1284495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Based on the ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system (O-RADS), we constructed a nomogram model to predict the malignancy potential of adnexal masses with sophisticated ultrasound morphology. Methods In a multicenter retrospective study, a total of 430 subjects with masses were collected in the adnexal region through an electronic medical record system at the Fourth Hospital of Harbin Medical University during the period of January 2019-April 2023. A total of 157 subjects were included in the exception validation cohort from Harbin Medical University Tumor Hospital. The pathological tumor findings were invoked as the gold standard to classify the subjects into benign and malignant groups. All patients were randomly allocated to the validation set and training set in a ratio of 7:3. A stepwise regression analysis was utilized for filtering variables. Logistic regression was conducted to construct a nomogram prediction model, which was further validated in the training set. The forest plot, C-index, calibration curve, and clinical decision curve were utilized to verify the model and assess its accuracy and validity, which were further compared with existing adnexal lesion models (O-RADS US) and assessments of different types of neoplasia in the adnexa (ADNEX). Results Four predictors as independent risk factors for malignancy were followed in the preparation of the diagnostic model: O-RADS classification, HE4 level, acoustic shadow, and protrusion blood flow score (all p < 0.05). The model showed moderate predictive power in the training set with a C-index of 0.959 (95%CI: 0.940-0.977), 0.929 (95%CI: 0.884-0.974) in the validation set, and 0.892 (95%CI: 0.843-0.940) in the external validation set. It showed that the predicted consequences of the nomogram agreed well with the actual results of the calibration curve, and the novel nomogram was clinically beneficial in decision curve analysis. Conclusion The risk of the nomogram of adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology contained four characteristics that showed a suitable predictive ability and provided better risk stratification. Its diagnostic performance significantly exceeded that of the ADNEX model and O-RADS US, and its screening performance was essentially equivalent to that of the ADNEX model and O-RADS US classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Xiaoqiu Dong
- Department of Ultrasound, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lems E, Leemans JC, Lok CAR, Bongers MY, Geomini PMAJ. Current uptake and barriers to wider use of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) models in Dutch gynaecological practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 291:240-246. [PMID: 37939622 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Correct referral of women with an ovarian tumor to an oncology department remains challenging. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) consortium has developed models with higher diagnostic accuracy than the alternative Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI). This study explores the uptake of the IOTA models in Dutch hospitals and factors that impede or promote implementation. Optimal implementation is crucial to improve pre-operative classification of ovarian tumors, which may lead to better patient referral to the appropriate level of care. STUDY DESIGN In February 2021, an electronic questionnaire consisting of 37 questions was sent to all 72 hospitals in the Netherlands. One pre-selected gynaecologist per hospital was asked to respond on behalf of the department. RESULTS The study had a response rate of 93% (67/72 hospitals). All respondents (100%) were familiar with the IOTA models with 94% using them in practice. The logistic regression 2 (LR2)-model, Simple ultrasound-based rules (SR) and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model were used in respectively 40%, 67% and 73% of these hospitals. Respondents rated the models overall with an 8.2 (SD 1.8), 8.3 (SD 1.6) and 8.9 (SD 1.3) respectively for LR2, SR and ADNEX on a scale from 1 to 10. Moreover, 89% indicated to have confidence in the results of the IOTA models. The most important factors to improve further implementation are more training (43%), research on sensitivity, specificity and cost-effectiveness in the Dutch health care system (27%), easier usability (24%) and more consultation time (19%). CONCLUSION The IOTA ultrasound models are adopted in the majority of Dutch hospitals with the ADNEX model being used the most. While Dutch gynecologists have a strong familiarity and confidence in the models, the uptake varies in reality. Areas that warrant improvement in the Dutch context are more uniformity, education and more research. These findings can be helpful for other countries considering adopting the IOTA models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Lems
- Máxima Medical Centre in Veldhoven, De Run 4600, 5504 DB Veldhoven, the Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Centre and Research School Grow, Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, the Netherlands.
| | - J C Leemans
- Máxima Medical Centre in Veldhoven, De Run 4600, 5504 DB Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - C A R Lok
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, the Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Y Bongers
- Máxima Medical Centre in Veldhoven, De Run 4600, 5504 DB Veldhoven, the Netherlands; Maastricht University Medical Centre and Research School Grow, Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, the Netherlands
| | - P M A J Geomini
- Máxima Medical Centre in Veldhoven, De Run 4600, 5504 DB Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brincat MR, Mira AR, Lawrence A. Current and Emerging Strategies for Tubo-Ovarian Cancer Diagnostics. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3331. [PMID: 37958227 PMCID: PMC10647517 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13213331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Tubo-ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynaecological cancer. More than 75% of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, which is associated with poorer overall survival. Symptoms at presentation are vague and non-specific, contributing to late diagnosis. Multimodal risk models have improved the diagnostic accuracy of adnexal mass assessment based on patient risk factors, coupled with findings on imaging and serum-based biomarker tests. Newly developed ultrasonographic assessment algorithms have standardised documentation and enable stratification of care between local hospitals and cancer centres. So far, no screening test has proven to reduce ovarian cancer mortality in the general population. This review is an update on the evidence behind ovarian cancer diagnostic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark R. Brincat
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
| | - Ana Rita Mira
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
- Hospital Garcia de Orta, 2805-267 Almada, Portugal
| | - Alexandra Lawrence
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wu M, Zhang M, Cao J, Wu S, Chen Y, Luo L, Lin X, Su M, Zhang X. Predictive accuracy and reproducibility of the O-RADS US scoring system among sonologists with different training levels. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 308:631-637. [PMID: 35994107 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06752-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the predictive performance and reproducibility of Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound (US) system in evaluating adnexal masses between sonologists with varying levels of expertise. METHODS This was a single-center retrospective study conducted between May 2019 and May 2020, which included 147 adnexal mases with pathological results. Four sonologists with varying experiences independently assigned an O-RADS US category to each adnexal mass twice. The intra- and inter-observer agreement was assessed using weighted kappa values. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) were assessed for each sonologist. RESULTS Of the 147 adnexal mases, 115 (78.2%) lesions were benign and 32 (21.8%) lesions were malignant. Considering O-RADS > 3 as a predictor for adnexal malignancy, the predictive accuracies of the four sonologists were excellent, with AUCs ranging from 0.831 to 0.926. The predictive accuracies of O-RADS US by experienced sonologists were significantly higher compared to inexperienced sonologists (all P values < 0.005). The O-RADS US presented high sensitivity and NPV value for each sonologist. With regard to the reproducibility of O-RADS, the intra- and inter-observer agreement among experienced sonologists performed better than inexperienced sonologists. CONCLUSION O-RADS showed difference in the predictive accuracy and reproducibility in the evaluation of adnexal masses among sonologists with different levels of expertise. Training is required for inexperienced sonologists before the generalization of O-RADS classification system in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manli Wu
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Man Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Junyan Cao
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuangyu Wu
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Chen
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Liping Luo
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Lin
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Manting Su
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Xinling Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pegu B, Sri Saranya T, Subburaj SP, Murugesan R. Evaluating the Frequency and Characteristics of Unexpected Ovarian Malignancy in Postmenopausal Women Who Have Undergone Laparoscopic Surgery for Adnexal Masses - A Review of Five Years. Cureus 2023; 15:e42872. [PMID: 37664369 PMCID: PMC10474307 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim The aim of this study was to estimate the frequent existence of unexpected ovarian malignant lesions after laparoscopic surgery for an apparent benign adnexal mass and assess its clinical and ultrasound characteristics in postmenopausal women. Methods We re-examined the hospital records of 96 cases of postmenopausal women who underwent laparoscopic surgery for benign adnexal mass over five years. The age of the patient, parity, ultrasound findings, tumor markers level, intraoperative findings, and histopathological report were collected. Pearson's Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis, and a p-value of <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Results Of a total of 96, benign adnexal mass was in 93 (96.83%), an unexpected ovarian malignancy was observed in two (2.08%) cases, and one (1.04%) had a borderline ovarian tumor. Tumor marker CA-125 was done for all those cases of adnexal mass in postmenopausal women, and not a single case was found to have above 35 IU/ml, defined as the cut-off value for CA-125. Statistically significant differences were observed between the benign and malignant groups in relation to symptoms (p<0.05), ultrasound score (p=0.001), and bilaterality (p=0.013) of the tumor mass. Conclusion In postmenopausal women, the critical concern for laparoscopic surgery of benign adnexal mass is unexpected malignancy. So it is essential to select patients carefully for laparoscopic surgery. If a benign-looking adnexal mass turned out to be malignant on the histopathological report, we should try to post the patient for subsequent staging laparotomy as soon as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhabani Pegu
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND
| | - Thangamuthu Sri Saranya
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND
| | - Sathiya P Subburaj
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, IND
| | - Rajeswari Murugesan
- Biostatistics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xu J, Huang Z, Zeng J, Zheng Z, Cao J, Su M, Zhang X. Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parameters in the Evaluation of Adnexal Masses with Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2023; 49:1527-1534. [PMID: 37032238 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine whether incorporating qualitative parameters of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can increase the accuracy of adnexal lesion assessments with Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound category 4 or 5. METHODS Retrospective analysis of patients with adnexal masses who underwent conventional ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations between January and August of 2020. The study investigators reviewed and analyzed the morphological features of each mass before categorizing the US images independently according to the O-RADS system published by the American College of Radiology. In the CEUS analysis, the initial time and intensity of enhancement involving the wall and/or septation of the mass were compared with the uterine myometrium. Internal components of each mass were observed for signs of enhancement. The sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's index were calculated as the contrast variables and O-RADS. RESULTS Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the best cutoff value was higher than O-RADS 4. When information on the extent of enhancement was applied to selectively upgrade O-RADS category 4 and selectively downgrade O-RADS category 5, the overall sensitivity increased to 90.2%, while the level of specificity (91.3%) remained the same. CONCLUSION Incorporating additional information from CEUS with respect to the extent of enhancement helped to improve the sensitivity of O-RADS category 4 and 5 masses without loss of specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Xu
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zeping Huang
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jie Zeng
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhijuan Zheng
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Junyan Cao
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Manting Su
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xinling Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chacon E, Arraiza M, Manzour N, Benito A, Mínguez JÁ, Vázquez-Vicente D, Castellanos T, Chiva L, Alcazar JL. Ultrasound examination, MRI, or ROMA for discriminating between inconclusive adnexal masses as determined by IOTA Simple Rules: a prospective study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023:ijgc-2022-004253. [PMID: 37055169 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the best second-step approach for discriminating benign from malignant adnexal masses classified as inconclusive by International Ovarian Tumour Analysis Simple Rules (IOTA-SR). METHODS Single-center prospective study comprising a consecutive series of patients diagnosed as having an adnexal mass classified as inconclusive according to IOTA-SR. All women underwent Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) analysis, MRI interpreted by a radiologist, and ultrasound examination by a gynecological sonologist. Cases were clinically managed according to the result of the ultrasound expert examination by either serial follow-up for at least 1 year or surgery. Reference standard was histology (patient was submitted to surgery if any of the tests was suspicious) or follow-up (masses with no signs of malignancy after 12 months were considered benign). Diagnostic performance of all three approaches was calculated and compared. Direct cost analysis of the test used was also performed. RESULTS Eighty-two adnexal masses in 80 women (median age 47.6 years, range 16 to 73 years) were included. Seventeen patients (17 masses) were managed expectantly (none had diagnosis of ovarian cancer after at least 12 months of follow-up) and 63 patients (65 masses) underwent surgery and tumor removal (40 benign and 25 malignant tumors). Sensitivity and specificity for ultrasound, MRI, and ROMA were 96% and 93%, 100% and 81%, and 24% and 93%, respectively. The specificity of ultrasound was better than that for MRI (p=0.021), and the sensitivity of ultrasound was better than that for ROMA (p<0.001), sensitivity was better for MRI than for ROMA (p<0.001) and the specificity of ROMA was better than that for MRI (p<0.001). Ultrasound evaluation was the most effective and least costly method as compared with MRI and ROMA. CONCLUSION In this study, ultrasound examination was the best second-step approach in inconclusive adnexal masses as determined by IOTA-SR, but the findings require confirmation in multicenter prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Chacon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Maria Arraiza
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Nabil Manzour
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Alberto Benito
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - José Ángel Mínguez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | | | - Teresa Castellanos
- Department of Gynecology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Chiva
- Department of Gynecology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Luis Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alcázar JL, Rodriguez-Guzman L, Vara J, Amor F, Diaz L, Vaccaro H. Gynecologic Imaging and Reporting Data System for classifying adnexal masses. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2023; 75:69-79. [PMID: 36790399 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-606x.22.05122-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of the so-called Gynecologic Imaging and Report Data System (GI-RADS) for classifying adnexal masses. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A search for studies reporting about the use of GI-RADS system for classifying adnexal masses from January 2009 to December 2021 was performed in Medline (Pubmed), Google Scholar, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios and diagnostic odd ratio (DOR) were calculated. Studies' quality was evaluated using QUADAS-2. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We identified 510 citations. Ultimately, 26 studies comprising 7350 masses were included. Mean prevalence of ovarian malignancy was 26%. The risk of bias was high in eight studies for domain "patient selection" and low for "index test," "reference test" domains for all studies. Overall, pooled estimated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio and DOR of GI-RADS system for classifying adnexal masses were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]=91-96%), 90% (95% CI=87-92%), 9.1 (95% CI=7.0-11.9), and 0.07 (95% CI=0.05-0.11), and 132 (95% CI=78-221), respectively. Heterogeneity was high for both sensitivity and specificity. Meta-regression showed that multiple observers and study's design explained this heterogeneity among studies. CONCLUSIONS GI-RADS system has a good diagnostic performance for classifying adnexal masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan L Alcázar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain -
| | | | - Julio Vara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando Amor
- Panoramic Ultrasonic Ultrasound Center, Santiago, Chile
| | - Linder Diaz
- AGB Ultrasonography Center, Clínica Sanatorio Alemán S.A., Concepción, Chile
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Landolfo C, Bourne T, Froyman W, Van Calster B, Ceusters J, Testa AC, Wynants L, Sladkevicius P, Van Holsbeke C, Domali E, Fruscio R, Epstein E, Franchi D, Kudla MJ, Chiappa V, Alcazar JL, Leone FPG, Buonomo F, Coccia ME, Guerriero S, Deo N, Jokubkiene L, Savelli L, Fischerova D, Czekierdowski A, Kaijser J, Coosemans A, Scambia G, Vergote I, Timmerman D, Valentin L. Benign descriptors and ADNEX in two-step strategy to estimate risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors: retrospective validation in IOTA5 multicenter cohort. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2023; 61:231-242. [PMID: 36178788 PMCID: PMC10107772 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous work has suggested that the ultrasound-based benign simple descriptors (BDs) can reliably exclude malignancy in a large proportion of women presenting with an adnexal mass. This study aimed to validate a modified version of the BDs and to validate a two-step strategy to estimate the risk of malignancy, in which the modified BDs are followed by the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model if modified BDs do not apply. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis using data from the 2-year interim analysis of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Phase-5 study, in which consecutive patients with at least one adnexal mass were recruited irrespective of subsequent management (conservative or surgery). The main outcome was classification of tumors as benign or malignant, based on histology or on clinical and ultrasound information during 1 year of follow-up. Multiple imputation was used when outcome based on follow-up was uncertain according to predefined criteria. RESULTS A total of 8519 patients were recruited at 36 centers between 2012 and 2015. We excluded patients who were already in follow-up at recruitment and all patients from 19 centers that did not fulfil our criteria for good-quality surgical and follow-up data, leaving 4905 patients across 17 centers for statistical analysis. Overall, 3441 (70%) tumors were benign, 978 (20%) malignant and 486 (10%) uncertain. The modified BDs were applicable in 1798/4905 (37%) tumors, of which 1786 (99.3%) were benign. The two-step strategy based on ADNEX without CA125 had an area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.96). The risk of malignancy was slightly underestimated, but calibration varied between centers. A sensitivity analysis in which we expanded the definition of uncertain outcome resulted in 1419 (29%) tumors with uncertain outcome and an AUC of the two-step strategy without CA125 of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95). CONCLUSION A large proportion of adnexal masses can be classified as benign by the modified BDs. For the remaining masses, the ADNEX model can be used to estimate the risk of malignancy. This two-step strategy is convenient for clinical use. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Landolfo
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Woman, Child and Public HealthFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
| | - T. Bourne
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea HospitalImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - W. Froyman
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - B. Van Calster
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Biomedical Data SciencesLeiden University Medical Centre (LUMC)LeidenThe Netherlands
| | - J. Ceusters
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of OncologyLeuven Cancer Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - A. C. Testa
- Department of Woman, Child and Public HealthFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
- Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità PubblicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - L. Wynants
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of EpidemiologyCAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - P. Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - C. Van Holsbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyZiekenhuis Oost‐LimburgGenkBelgium
| | - E. Domali
- First Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyAlexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece
| | - R. Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Milano‐Bicocca, San Gerardo HospitalMonzaItaly
| | - E. Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and EducationKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySödersjukhusetStockholmSweden
| | - D. Franchi
- Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of GynecologyEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCSMilanItaly
| | - M. J. Kudla
- Department of Perinatology and Oncological GynecologyFaculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of SilesiaKatowicePoland
| | - V. Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic OncologyNational Cancer Institute of MilanMilanItaly
| | - J. L. Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyClinica Universidad de Navarra, School of MedicinePamplonaSpain
| | - F. P. G. Leone
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBiomedical and Clinical Sciences Institute L. Sacco, University of MilanMilanItaly
| | - F. Buonomo
- Institute for Maternal and Child HealthIRCCS ‘Burlo Garofolo’TriesteItaly
| | - M. E. Coccia
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
| | - S. Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio CasulaCagliariItaly
| | - N. Deo
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyWhipps Cross HospitalLondonUK
| | - L. Jokubkiene
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - L. Savelli
- Gynecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproduction UnitSant'Orsola‐Malpighi Hospital of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - D. Fischerova
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of MedicineCharles University and General University Hospital in PraguePragueCzech Republic
| | - A. Czekierdowski
- First Department of Gynecological Oncology and GynecologyMedical University of LublinLublinPoland
| | - J. Kaijser
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyIkazia HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - A. Coosemans
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of OncologyLeuven Cancer Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - G. Scambia
- Department of Woman, Child and Public HealthFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
- Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità PubblicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - I. Vergote
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of OncologyLeuven Cancer Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - D. Timmerman
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - L. Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
O-RADS MRI After Initial Ultrasound for Adnexal Lesions: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 220:6-15. [PMID: 35975887 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.28084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound (US) and MRI risk stratification systems were developed by an international group of experts in adnexal imaging to aid radiologists in assessing adnexal lesions. The goal of imaging is to appropriately triage patients with adnexal lesions. US is the first-line imaging modality for assessment, whereas MRI can be used as a problem-solving tool. Both US and MRI can accurately characterize benign lesions such as simple cysts, endometriomas, hemorrhagic cysts, and dermoid cysts, avoiding unnecessary or inappropriate surgery. In patients with a lesion that does not meet criteria for one of these benign diagnoses, MRI can further characterize the lesion with an improved specificity for cancer and the ability to provide a probable histologic subtype in the presence of certain MRI features. This allows personalized treatment, including avoiding overly extensive surgery or allowing fertility-sparing procedures for suspected benign, borderline, or low-grade tumors. When MRI findings indicate a risk of an invasive cancer, patients can be expeditiously referred to a gynecologic oncologic surgeon. This narrative review provides expert opinion on the utility of multiparametric MRI when using the O-RADS US and MRI management systems.
Collapse
|
15
|
Manegold-Brauer G, Timmerman D, Hoopmann M. Evaluation of Adnexal Masses: The IOTA Concept. ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN (STUTTGART, GERMANY : 1980) 2022; 43:550-569. [PMID: 36220077 DOI: 10.1055/a-1912-5361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian lesions have a wide range of sonomorphological features with numerous different underlying benign and malignant histologies. Based on the studies conducted by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group, ovarian masses can currently be reliably characterized by ultrasound. In the following article, we explain how to use the IOTA terms and definitions and we provide insight into how to safely triage patients with an ovarian mass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Markus Hoopmann
- Department of obstetrics and gynaecology, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Afsar S. Biomarkers in Gynecologic Tumors. Biomark Med 2022. [DOI: 10.2174/9789815040463122010004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Gynecologic malignancies are one of the most frequent cancers amongst
women. Biomarkers are crucial for the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses;
however, their potential for diagnosis is limited. In the era of difficulty in ovarian
cancer screening, novel biomarkers are defined, but CA125 still remains the most
valuable one. Circulating tumor DNAs, DNA hypermethylation, metabolites,
microRNAs, and kallikreins have recently turned out as ovarian cancer biomarkers and
are being applied to clinical practice. For uterine cancer, genomic classification has
now been described, it will be used as a prognostic tool. In this chapter, we describe
ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer biomarkers in detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selim Afsar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Balıkesir University Medical Faculty, Balikesir,
Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Sisodia
- From Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School - both in Boston
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Protein Panel of Serum-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles for the Screening and Diagnosis of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153719. [PMID: 35954383 PMCID: PMC9367436 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Although ovarian cancer, a gynecological malignancy, has the highest fatality rate, it still lacks highly specific biomarkers, and the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses remains difficult to determine for gynecologists. Our study aimed to obtain ovarian cancer-specific protein candidates from the circulating small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) and develop a protein panel for ovarian cancer screening and differential diagnosis of ovarian masses. In our study, sEVs derived from the serum of healthy controls and patients with cystadenoma and ovarian cancer were investigated to obtain a cancer-specific proteomic profile. In a discovery cohort, 1119 proteins were identified, and significant differences in the protein profiles of EVs were observed among groups. Then, 23 differentially expressed proteins were assessed using the parallel reaction monitoring in a validation cohort. Through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, a novel model comprising three proteins (fibrinogen gamma gene (FGG), mucin 16 (MUC16), and apolipoprotein (APOA4)) was established to screen patients with ovarian cancer. This model exhibited an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.936 (95% CI, 0.888–0.984) with 92.0% sensitivity and 82.9% specificity. Another panel comprising serum CA125, sEV-APOA4, and sEV-CD5L showed excellent performance (AUC 0.945 (95% CI, 0.890–1.000), sensitivity of 88.0%, specificity of 93.3%, and accuracy of 89.2%) to distinguish malignancy from benign ovarian masses. Altogether, our study provided a proteomic signature of circulating sEVs in ovarian cancer. The diagnostic proteomic panel may complement current clinical diagnostic measures for screening ovarian cancer in the general population and the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses.
Collapse
|
19
|
Davenport CF, Rai N, Sharma P, Deeks J, Berhane S, Mallett S, Saha P, Solanki R, Bayliss S, Snell K, Sundar S. Diagnostic Models Combining Clinical Information, Ultrasound and Biochemical Markers for Ovarian Cancer: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:3621. [PMID: 35892881 PMCID: PMC9332683 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is a diagnostic challenge, with the majority diagnosed at late stages. Existing systematic reviews of diagnostic models either use inappropriate meta-analytic methods or do not conduct statistical comparisons of models or stratify test performance by menopausal status. Methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CDSR, DARE, Health Technology Assessment Database and SCI Science Citation Index, trials registers, conference proceedings from 1991 to June 2019. Cochrane collaboration review methods included QUADAS-2 quality assessment and meta-analysis using hierarchical modelling. RMI, ROMA or ADNEX at any test positivity threshold were investigated. Histology or clinical follow-up was the reference standard. We excluded screening studies, studies restricted to pregnancy, recurrent or metastatic OC. 2 × 2 diagnostic tables were extracted separately for pre- and post-menopausal women. Results: We included 58 studies (30,121 patients, 9061 cases of ovarian cancer). Prevalence of OC ranged from 16 to 55% in studies. For premenopausal women, ROMA at a threshold of 13.1 (+/−2) and ADNEX at a threshold of 10% demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity compared to RMI I at 200 (p < 0.0001) 77.8 (72.5, 82.4), 94.9 (92.5, 96.6), and 57.1% (50.6 to 63.4) but lower specificity (p < 0.002), 92.5 (90.0, 94.4), 84.3 (81.3, 86.8), and 78.2 (75.8, 80.4). For postmenopausal women, ROMA at a threshold of 27.7 (+/−2) and AdNEX at a threshold of 10% demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity compared to RMI I at a threshold of 200 (p < 0.001) 90.4 (87.4, 92.7), 97.6 (96.2, 98.5), and 78.7 (74.3, 82.5), specificity of ROMA was comparable, whilst ADneX was lower, 85.5 (81.3, 88.9), 81.3 (76.9, 85.0) (p = 0.155), compared to RMI 55.2 (51.2, 59.1) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In pre-menopausal women, ROMA and ADNEX offer significantly higher sensitivity but significantly decreased specificity. In post-menopausal women, ROMA demonstrates significantly higher sensitivity and comparable specificity to RMI I, ADNEX has the highest sensitivity of all models, but with significantly reduced specificity. RMI I has poor sensitivity compared to ROMA or ADNEX. Choice between ROMA and ADNEX as a replacement test will depend on cost effectiveness and resource implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare F. Davenport
- Test Evaluation Research Group, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (P.S.); (J.D.); (S.B.); (S.B.)
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Nirmala Rai
- Southend University Hospital NHS Trust, Southend-on-Sea SS0 0RY, UK;
| | - Pawana Sharma
- Test Evaluation Research Group, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (P.S.); (J.D.); (S.B.); (S.B.)
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Jon Deeks
- Test Evaluation Research Group, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (P.S.); (J.D.); (S.B.); (S.B.)
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Sarah Berhane
- Test Evaluation Research Group, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (P.S.); (J.D.); (S.B.); (S.B.)
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Sue Mallett
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London NW1 2BU, UK;
| | - Pratyusha Saha
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK;
| | - Rita Solanki
- Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK;
| | - Susan Bayliss
- Test Evaluation Research Group, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (P.S.); (J.D.); (S.B.); (S.B.)
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Kym Snell
- Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK;
| | - Sudha Sundar
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B187QH, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Vincent Drive, Edgbaston, Birmingham B152TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Davenport C, Rai N, Sharma P, Deeks JJ, Berhane S, Mallett S, Saha P, Champaneria R, Bayliss SE, Snell KI, Sundar S. Menopausal status, ultrasound and biomarker tests in combination for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in symptomatic women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 7:CD011964. [PMID: 35879201 PMCID: PMC9314189 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011964.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer (OC) has the highest case fatality rate of all gynaecological cancers. Diagnostic delays are caused by non-specific symptoms. Existing systematic reviews have not comprehensively covered tests in current practice, not estimated accuracy separately in pre- and postmenopausal women, or used inappropriate meta-analytic methods. OBJECTIVES To establish the accuracy of combinations of menopausal status, ultrasound scan (USS) and biomarkers for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in pre- and postmenopausal women and compare the accuracy of different test combinations. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), five other databases and three trial registries from 1991 to 2015 and MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase (Ovid) form June 2015 to June 2019. We also searched conference proceedings from the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, International Gynecologic Cancer Society, American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Gynecologic Oncology, ZETOC and Conference Proceedings Citation Index (Web of Knowledge). We searched reference lists of included studies and published systematic reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA We included cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy studies evaluating single tests or comparing two or more tests, randomised trials comparing two or more tests, and studies validating multivariable models for the diagnosis of OC investigating test combinations, compared with a reference standard of histological confirmation or clinical follow-up in women with a pelvic mass (detected clinically or through USS) suspicious for OC. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed quality using QUADAS-2. We used the bivariate hierarchical model to indirectly compare tests at commonly reported thresholds in pre- and postmenopausal women separately. We indirectly compared tests across all thresholds and estimated sensitivity at fixed specificities of 80% and 90% by fitting hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) models in pre- and postmenopausal women separately. MAIN RESULTS We included 59 studies (32,059 women, 9545 cases of OC). Two tests evaluated the accuracy of a combination of menopausal status and USS findings (IOTA Logistic Regression Model 2 (LR2) and the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa model (ADNEX)); one test evaluated the accuracy of a combination of menopausal status, USS findings and serum biomarker CA125 (Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI)); and one test evaluated the accuracy of a combination of menopausal status and two serum biomarkers (CA125 and HE4) (Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA)). Most studies were at high or unclear risk of bias in participant, reference standard, and flow and timing domains. All studies were in hospital settings. Prevalence was 16% (RMI, ROMA), 22% (LR2) and 27% (ADNEX) in premenopausal women and 38% (RMI), 45% (ROMA), 52% (LR2) and 55% (ADNEX) in postmenopausal women. The prevalence of OC in the studies was considerably higher than would be expected in symptomatic women presenting in community-based settings, or in women referred from the community to hospital with a suspicion of OC. Studies were at high or unclear applicability because presenting features were not reported, or USS was performed by experienced ultrasonographers for RMI, LR2 and ADNEX. The higher sensitivity and lower specificity observed in postmenopausal compared to premenopausal women across all index tests and at all thresholds may reflect highly selected patient cohorts in the included studies. In premenopausal women, ROMA at a threshold of 13.1 (± 2), LR2 at a threshold to achieve a post-test probability of OC of 10% and ADNEX (post-test probability 10%) demonstrated a higher sensitivity (ROMA: 77.4%, 95% CI 72.7% to 81.5%; LR2: 83.3%, 95% CI 74.7% to 89.5%; ADNEX: 95.5%, 95% CI 91.0% to 97.8%) compared to RMI (57.2%, 95% CI 50.3% to 63.8%). The specificity of ROMA and ADNEX were lower in premenopausal women (ROMA: 84.3%, 95% CI 81.2% to 87.0%; ADNEX: 77.8%, 95% CI 67.4% to 85.5%) compared to RMI 92.5% (95% CI 90.3% to 94.2%). The specificity of LR2 was comparable to RMI (90.4%, 95% CI 84.6% to 94.1%). In postmenopausal women, ROMA at a threshold of 27.7 (± 2), LR2 (post-test probability 10%) and ADNEX (post-test probability 10%) demonstrated a higher sensitivity (ROMA: 90.3%, 95% CI 87.5% to 92.6%; LR2: 94.8%, 95% CI 92.3% to 96.6%; ADNEX: 97.6%, 95% CI 95.6% to 98.7%) compared to RMI (78.4%, 95% CI 74.6% to 81.7%). Specificity of ROMA at a threshold of 27.7 (± 2) (81.5, 95% CI 76.5% to 85.5%) was comparable to RMI (85.4%, 95% CI 82.0% to 88.2%), whereas for LR2 (post-test probability 10%) and ADNEX (post-test probability 10%) specificity was lower (LR2: 60.6%, 95% CI 50.5% to 69.9%; ADNEX: 55.0%, 95% CI 42.8% to 66.6%). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In specialist healthcare settings in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, RMI has poor sensitivity. In premenopausal women, ROMA, LR2 and ADNEX offer better sensitivity (fewer missed cancers), but for ROMA and ADNEX this is off-set by a decrease in specificity and increase in false positives. In postmenopausal women, ROMA demonstrates a higher sensitivity and comparable specificity to RMI. ADNEX has the highest sensitivity in postmenopausal women, but reduced specificity. The prevalence of OC in included studies is representative of a highly selected referred population, rather than a population in whom referral is being considered. The comparative accuracy of tests observed here may not be transferable to non-specialist settings. Ultimately health systems need to balance accuracy and resource implications to identify the most suitable test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Davenport
- Test Evaluation Research Group, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nirmala Rai
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Pawana Sharma
- Test Evaluation Research Group, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jonathan J Deeks
- Test Evaluation Research Group, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sarah Berhane
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sue Mallett
- UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Pratyusha Saha
- Medical School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rita Champaneria
- Systematic Review Initiative, NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford, UK
| | - Susan E Bayliss
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kym Ie Snell
- Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Sudha Sundar
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bullock B, Larkin L, Turker L, Stampler K. Management of the Adnexal Mass: Considerations for the Family Medicine Physician. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:913549. [PMID: 35865172 PMCID: PMC9294310 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.913549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most deadly gynecological cancer, so proper assessment of a pelvic mass is necessary in order to determine which are at high risk for malignancy and should be referred to a gynecologic oncologist. However, in a family medicine setting, evaluation and treatment of these masses can be challenging due to a lack of resources. A number of risk assessment tools are available to family medicine physicians, including imaging techniques, imaging systems, and blood-based biomarker assays each with their respective pros and cons, and varying ability to detect malignancy in pelvic masses. Effective utilization of these assessment tools can inform the care pathway for patients which present with an adnexal mass, such as expectant management for those with a low risk of malignancy, or referral to a gynecologic oncologist for surgery and staging, for those at high risk of malignancy. Triaging patients to the appropriate care pathway improves patient outcomes and satisfaction, and family medicine physicians can play a key role in this decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lisa Larkin
- Lisa Larkin, MD, and Associates, Cincinnati, OH, United States
- Ms. Medicine Healthcare Organization, Cincinnati, OH, United States
- Cincinnati Sexual Health Consortium, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | | | - Kate Stampler
- Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- *Correspondence: Kate Stampler,
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vara J, Manzour N, Chacón E, López-Picazo A, Linares M, Pascual MÁ, Guerriero S, Alcázar JL. Ovarian Adnexal Reporting Data System (O-RADS) for Classifying Adnexal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133151. [PMID: 35804924 PMCID: PMC9264796 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to assess the diagnostic performance of the Ovarian Adnexal Report Data System (O-RADS) using transvaginal ultrasound for classifying adnexal masses. Data from 11 studies comprising 4634 masses showed that the pooled estimated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of O-RADS system for classifying adnexal masses were 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 94%–98%), 77% (95% CI = 68%–84%), 4.2 (95% CI= 2.9–6.0), 0.04 (95% CI = 0.03–0.07), and 96 (95% CI = 50–185), respectively. We concluded that the O-RADS system has good sensitivity and moderate specificity for classifying adnexal masses. Abstract In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the pooled diagnostic performance of the so-called Ovarian Adnexal Report Data System (O-RADS) for classifying adnexal masses using transvaginal ultrasound, a classification system that was introduced in 2020. We performed a search for studies reporting the use of the O-RADS system for classifying adnexal masses from January 2020 to April 2022 in several databases (Medline (PubMed), Google Scholar, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science). We selected prospective and retrospective cohort studies using the O-RADS system for classifying adnexal masses with histologic diagnosis or conservative management demonstrating spontaneous resolution or persistence in cases of benign appearing masses after follow-up scan as the reference standard. We excluded studies not related to the topic under review, studies not addressing O-RADS classification, studies addressing MRI O-RADS classification, letters to the editor, commentaries, narrative reviews, consensus documents, and studies where data were not available for constructing a 2 × 2 table. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. The quality of the studies was evaluated using QUADAS-2. A total of 502 citations were identified. Ultimately, 11 studies comprising 4634 masses were included. The mean prevalence of ovarian malignancy was 32%. The risk of bias was high in eight studies for the “patient selection” domain. The risk of bias was low for the “index test” and “reference test” domains for all studies. Overall, the pooled estimated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and DOR of the O-RADS system for classifying adnexal masses were 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 94%–98%), 77% (95% CI = 68%–84%), 4.2 (95% CI = 2.9–6.0), 0.04 (95% CI = 0.03–0.07), and 96 (95% CI = 50–185), respectively. Heterogeneity was moderate for sensitivity and high for specificity. In conclusion, the O-RADS system has good sensitivity and moderate specificity for classifying adnexal masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio Vara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain; (J.V.); (N.M.); (E.C.); (A.L.-P.)
| | - Nabil Manzour
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain; (J.V.); (N.M.); (E.C.); (A.L.-P.)
| | - Enrique Chacón
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain; (J.V.); (N.M.); (E.C.); (A.L.-P.)
| | - Ana López-Picazo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain; (J.V.); (N.M.); (E.C.); (A.L.-P.)
| | - Marta Linares
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universitiy Hospital Puerta del Mar, 11009 Cadiz, Spain;
| | - Maria Ángela Pascual
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproduction, Hospital Universitari Dexeus, 08028 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Stefano Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, 09042 Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Juan Luis Alcázar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain; (J.V.); (N.M.); (E.C.); (A.L.-P.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-948-296234; Fax: +34-948296500
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lof P, van de Vrie R, Korse C, van Gent M, Mom C, Rosier - van Dunné F, van Baal W, Verhoeve H, Hermsen B, Verbruggen M, Hemelaar M, van de Swaluw A, Knipscheer H, Huirne J, Westenberg S, van der Noort V, Amant F, van den Broek D, Lok C. Can serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) support the decision to refer a patient with an ovarian mass to an oncology hospital? Gynecol Oncol 2022; 166:284-291. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
24
|
Elliott CG, Murji A, Matelski J, Adekola AB, Chrzanowski J, Shirreff L. Unexpected malignancy at the time of hysterectomy performed for a benign indication: A retrospective review. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0266338. [PMID: 35363824 PMCID: PMC8975168 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the proportion of patients undergoing hysterectomy for a benign indication who have unexpected malignancy (UM) on postoperative pathology and characterize the nature of UMs. Methods This was a multi-center, retrospective study of patients undergoing hysterectomy for a benign indication from July 2016 to December 2019 at 7 Ontario, Canada hospitals (4 academic, 3 community). Hysterectomies for invasive placentation, malignant, and premalignant indications were excluded. Primary outcome was rate of unexpected malignancy as defined by the number of patients with malignancy on final pathology divided by the total number of hysterectomy cases. Data was extracted from health records and electronic charts. Patient, surgical, and surgeon characteristics were compared between benign and UM groups using bivariate methods. Associations between UM status and perioperative variables were assessed using bivariate logistic regression. Results In the study period, 2779 hysterectomies were performed. UM incidence was 1.8% (51 malignancies/2779 cases), with one patient having two malignancies (total UMs = 52). The most common UM types were endometrial (27/52, 51.9%) and sarcoma (13/52, 25%). Patients with UM were older (57.2 ± 11.4 years vs. 52.8 ± 12.5 years, p = .015), had more previous laparotomies (2 (1.25, 2.0) vs. 1 (1.0, 1.0), p < .001), and higher BMI (29.7 ± 7.2 kg/m2 vs. 28.0 ± 5.9 kg/m2, p = .049) and ASA class (p < .028). Regarding surgical factors, patients with UM had more adhesions (p = .001), transfusions (p = .020), and blood loss (p = .006) compared to those with benign pathology. Patient characteristics most strongly associated with UM were age (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.78–3.72, p < .001) and preoperative diagnosis of pelvic mass (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.11–6.20, p = .019). Conclusion Incidence of UM at hysterectomy for benign indication was 1.8%. Several perioperative variables are associated with an increased chance of UM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara G. Elliott
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ally Murji
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Matelski
- Biostatistics Research Unit, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adebanke Bianca Adekola
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica Chrzanowski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lindsay Shirreff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
The lack of preclinical models of spontaneous ovarian cancer (OVCA), a fatal gynecological malignancy, is a significant barrier to generating information on early changes indicative of OVCA. In contrast to rodents, laying hens develop OVCA spontaneously, with remarkable similarities to OVCA in women regarding tumor histology, OVCA dissemination, immune responses, and risk factors. These important features of OVCA will be useful to develop an early detection test for OVCA, which would significantly reduce mortality rates; preventive strategies; immunotherapeutics; prevention of resistance to chemotherapeutics; and exploration of gene therapies. A transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) imaging method for imaging of hen ovarian tumors has been developed. Hens can be monitored prospectively by using serum markers, together with TVUS imaging, to detect early-stage OVCA, provided that a panel of serum markers can be established and imaging agents developed. Recent sequencing of the chicken genome will further facilitate the hen model to explore gene therapies against OVCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Animesh Barua
- Laboratory of Translational Research on Ovarian Cancer, Department of Cell and Molecular Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA;
| | - Janice M Bahr
- Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gorski JW, Dietrich CS, Davis C, Erol L, Dietrich H, Per NJ, Ferrell EL, McDowell AB, Riggs MJ, Hutchcraft ML, Baldwin-Branch LA, Miller RW, DeSimone CP, Gallion HH, Ueland FR, van Nagell JR, Pavlik EJ. Significance of Pelvic Fluid Observed during Ovarian Cancer Screening with Transvaginal Sonogram. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12010144. [PMID: 35054310 PMCID: PMC8774702 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The primary objective was to examine the role of pelvic fluid observed during transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) in identifying ovarian malignancy. A single-institution, observational study was conducted within the University of Kentucky Ovarian Cancer Screening trial from January 1987 to September 2019. We analyzed true-positive (TP), false-positive (FP), true-negative (TN), and false-negative (FN) groups for the presence of pelvic fluid during screening encounters. Measured outcomes were the presence and duration of fluid over successive screening encounters. Of the 48,925 women surveyed, 2001 (4.1%) had pelvic fluid present during a TVS exam. The odds ratio (OR) of detecting fluid in the comparison group (TN screen; OR = 1) significantly differed from that of the FP cases (benign pathology; OR: 13.4; 95% confidence interval (CI): 9.1–19.8), the TP cases with a low malignant potential (LMP; OR: 28; 95% CI: 26.5–29.5), TP ovarian cancer cases (OR: 50.4; 95% CI: 27.2–93.2), and FN ovarian cancer cases (OR: 59.3; 95% CI: 19.7–178.1). The mean duration that pelvic fluid was present for women with TN screens was 2.2 ± 0.05 encounters, lasting 38.7 ± 1.3 months. In an asymptomatic screening population, free fluid identified in TVS exams was more associated with ovarian malignancy than in the control group or benign ovarian tumors. While pelvic free fluid may not solely discriminate malignancy from non-malignancy, it appears to be clinically relevant and warrants thoughtful consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin W. Gorski
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Charles S. Dietrich
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Caeli Davis
- Denison University, Granville, OH 43023, USA;
| | - Lindsay Erol
- Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI 96859, USA;
| | | | - Nicholas J. Per
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (N.J.P.); (E.L.F.)
| | - Emily Lenk Ferrell
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (N.J.P.); (E.L.F.)
| | - Anthony B. McDowell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - McKayla J. Riggs
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Megan L. Hutchcraft
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Lauren A. Baldwin-Branch
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Rachel W. Miller
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Christopher P. DeSimone
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Holly H. Gallion
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Frederick R. Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - John R. van Nagell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
| | - Edward J. Pavlik
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.W.G.); (C.S.D.III); (A.B.M.); (M.J.R.); (M.L.H.); (L.A.B.-B.); (R.W.M.); (C.P.D.); (H.H.G.); (F.R.U.); (J.R.v.N.J.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gao B, Zhao X, Gu P, Sun D, Liu X, Li W, Zhang A, Peng E, Xu D. A nomogram model based on clinical markers for predicting malignancy of ovarian tumors. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:963559. [PMID: 36506042 PMCID: PMC9729545 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.963559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to build a nomogram based on clinical markers for predicting the malignancy of ovarian tumors (OTs). METHOD A total of 1,268 patients diagnosed with OTs that were surgically removed between October 2017 and May 2019 were enrolled. Clinical markers such as post-menopausal status, body mass index (BMI), serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) value, cancer antigen 125 (CA125) value, Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) index, course of disease, patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) score, ascites, and locations and features of masses were recorded and analyzed (p 0.05). Significant variables were further selected using multivariate logistic regression analysis and were included in the decision curve analysis (DCA) used to assess the value of the nomogram model for predicting OT malignancy. RESULT The significant variables included post-menopausal status, BMI, HE4 value, CA125 value, ROMA index, course of disease, PG-SGA score, ascites, and features and locations of masses (p 0.05). The ROMA index, BMI (≥ 26), unclear/blurred mass boundary (on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]/computed tomography [CT]), mass detection (on MRI/CT), and mass size and features (on type B ultrasound [BUS]) were screened out for multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the value of the nomogram model for predicting OT malignant risk (p 0.05). The DCA revealed that the net benefit of the nomogram's calculation model was superior to that of the CA125 value, HE4 value, and ROMA index for predicting OT malignancy. CONCLUSION We successfully tailored a nomogram model based on selected clinical markers which showed superior prognostic predictive accuracy compared with the use of the CA125, HE4, or ROMA index (that combines both HE and CA125 values) for predicting the malignancy of OT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bingsi Gao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xingping Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Pan Gu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Dan Sun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Xinyi Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Waixing Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Aiqian Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Enuo Peng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- *Correspondence: Enuo Peng, ; Dabao Xu,
| | - Dabao Xu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- *Correspondence: Enuo Peng, ; Dabao Xu,
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhou S, Guo Y, Wen L, Zhao B, Liu M. The learning curve and difficult points of the O-RADS ultrasound risk stratification system in 54 trainees. Ultrasonography 2021; 41:365-372. [PMID: 34923802 PMCID: PMC8942735 DOI: 10.14366/usg.21158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve and explore the difficult points of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound risk stratification system. Methods One hundred adnexal masses (AMs) were randomly selected for five tests as training data. Two experienced trainers had an inter-rater agreement of 0.95 for the O-RADS scores. Fifty-four trainees (26 level I practitioners [group 1], 17 level II practitioners [group 2], and 11 experienced level II practitioners [group 3]) attended the training. Every trainee received assessment and feedback after 20 scored cases. The outcomes of the five tests were compared among the three groups using repeated-measurements analysis of variance. Results Of the 100 AMs, 52 were pathologically benign and 48 were malignant; the O-RADS scores were 2, 3, 4, and 5 in 22, 11, 48, and 19 AMs, respectively. The between-subjects effects test showed no significant differences between groups 1, 2, and 3 for the five tests (P=0.501). For each group, the differences among the five tests were significant (P<0.001, P=0.006, and P=0.044 for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Test 2 was the worst. In 23 cases, more than 40% of trainees gave incorrect answers, which mainly related to classic benign lesions, the color flow score, and solid-appearing masses. Conclusion After training, junior doctors at different levels can reach a coincident O-RADS ultrasound risk stratification. The difficulties primarily related to subjective judgments of classic benign lesions, the color flow score, and solid-appearing masses. More experience is needed to improve the applicability of the system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan Zhou
- Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China
| | - Yuyang Guo
- Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China
| | - Lieming Wen
- Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China
| | - Baihua Zhao
- Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China
| | - Minghui Liu
- Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee SJ, Kim YH, Lee MY, Ko HS, Oh SY, Seol HJ, Kim JW, Ahn KH, Na S, Seong WJ, Kim HS, Park CW, Park JS, Jun JK, Won HS, Kim MY, Hwang HS, Lee SM. Ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian mass for predicting malignancy in pregnant women. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 163:385-391. [PMID: 34561098 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to compare ultrasonographic ovarian mass scoring systems in pregnant women. STUDY DESIGN This multicenter study included women with an ovarian mass during pregnancy who were evaluated using ultrasound and underwent surgery in 11 referral hospitals. The ovarian mass was evaluated and scored using three different scoring systems(International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adnexa[IOTA ADNEX], Sassone, and Lerner). The final diagnosis was made histopathologically. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves were generated for each scoring system. RESULTS During the study period, 236 pregnant women underwent surgery for an ovarian mass, including 223 women(94.5%) with a benign ovarian mass and 13 women(5.5%) with a malignant ovarian mass. Among 10 ultrasound image findings, six findings were different between benign and ovarian masses(maximal diameter of mass, maximal diameter of solid mass, wall thickness of mass, inner wall structure, thickness of septations, and papillarity). In all three scoring systems, the ovarian mass scores were significantly higher in malignant masses than in benign masses, with the highest area under the ROC curve(AUROC) in the Sassone scoring system(AUROC: 0.831 for Sassone, 0.710 for Lerner vs 0.709 for IOTA ADNEX; p < 0.05, between the Sassone and Lerner/ IOTA ADNEX). A combined model was developed with the six different ultrasound findings, and the AUROC of the combined model was 0.883(p = not significant between the combined model and Sassone). CONCLUSION In pregnant women, malignant ovarian tumors can be predicted with high accuracy using either the Sassone scoring system or the combined model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se Jin Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangwon National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Han Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi-Young Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Sun Ko
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soo-Young Oh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Joo Seol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Woon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Hoon Ahn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sunghun Na
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangwon National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Joon Seong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Seung Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chan-Wook Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joong Shin Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Kwan Jun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye-Sung Won
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Moon Young Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Han Sung Hwang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Seung Mi Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Xu A, Nie F, Liu T, Dong T, Bu L, Yang D. Adnexal masses: Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound using the simple rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2021; 157:568-573. [PMID: 34510439 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of the Simple Rules (SR) from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant adnexal tumors. METHODS A total of 180 patients with suspected malignant adnexal masses admitted to Lanzhou University Second Hospital were included, all of whom received conventional ultrasound (US) and CEUS examination before surgery. All masses were assessed using SR in US and SR in CEUS. To compare the diagnostic performance, the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, Youden index, and area under the curves values of SR in US and SR in CEUS were obtained. RESULTS Sensitivity, negative predictive values, Youden index, and area under the curves were better for SR in CEUS than SR in US. The specificity and negative predictive value of SR in CEUS were lower than that of SR in US. Compared with SR in US, SR in CEUS significantly reduced the number of uncertain masses (21, 36.7% vs. 66, 11.7%). CONCLUSION We concluded that SR in CEUS performed well in the diagnosis of malignant adnexal masses. SR in CEUS is a supplement to SR in US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ailing Xu
- Ultrasound Medical Center, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Fang Nie
- Ultrasound Medical Center, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ting Liu
- Ultrasound Medical Center, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Tiantian Dong
- Ultrasound Medical Center, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Lan Bu
- Ultrasound Medical Center, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Dan Yang
- Ultrasound Medical Center, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Friedrich L, Meyer R, Levin G. Management of adnexal mass: A comparison of five national guidelines. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 265:80-89. [PMID: 34474226 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 07/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES General gynecologists are often the first to face a newly diagnosed adnexal mass. Bothering mass symptoms, fertility issues, and the effect of a possible surgical intervention on fertility in term of mechanical factor and ovarian follicular reserve are all considerations that should be accounted for. This study summarizes and compares five different adnexal mass management guidelines, enabling clinicians to peruse consensus and controversy issues, thus choosing the optimal management method. DESIGN We retrieved, reviewed and compared the most recent national guidelines of adnexal mass management from the national societies of the United States (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists), England (the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists), Canada (the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada), Australia (the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners), and France (French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians). RESULTS There is a broad consensus regarding the role of transvaginal ultrasound as part of the initial evaluation of an adnexal mass and the radiological characteristics suggesting it being malignant. The role of transabdominal ultrasound or doppler mode is controversial. The use of MRI in cases of indeterminate adnexal masses is widely accepted. Ultrasound-guided aspiration is generally not recommended. There is a broad consensus that CA-125 should not be used as an ovarian cancer disease screening tool, though its role in the initial evaluation of adnexal masses is controversial. Risk prediction models are generally accepted, particularly the 'International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules' and the 'Risk of Malignancy Index'. CONCLUSION Adnexal mass management national guidelines, though similar, had noticeable variations in the content, references cited, and recommendations made. While this variation might raise a concern as to the reproducibility of synthesizing literature, it can help practitioners present all spectra of recommendations and available data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lior Friedrich
- The Joyce & Irving Goldman Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
| | - Raanan Meyer
- The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel; The Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Gabriel Levin
- The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; The Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Timmerman D, Planchamp F, Bourne T, Landolfo C, du Bois A, Chiva L, Cibula D, Concin N, Fischerova D, Froyman W, Gallardo G, Lemley B, Loft A, Mereu L, Morice P, Querleu D, Testa AC, Vergote I, Vandecaveye V, Scambia G, Fotopoulou C. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2021; 58:148-168. [PMID: 33794043 DOI: 10.1002/uog.23635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based statements on the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors, including imaging techniques, biomarkers and prediction models. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE nominated a multidisciplinary international group, including expert practising clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors and management of patients with ovarian cancer (19 experts across Europe). A patient representative was also included in the group. To ensure that the statements were evidence-based, the current literature was reviewed and critically appraised. Preliminary statements were drafted based on the review of the relevant literature. During a conference call, the whole group discussed each preliminary statement and a first round of voting was carried out. Statements were removed when consensus among group members was not obtained. The voters had the opportunity to provide comments/suggestions with their votes. The statements were then revised accordingly. Another round of voting was carried out according to the same rules to allow the whole group to evaluate the revised version of the statements. The group achieved consensus on 18 statements. This Consensus Statement presents these ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE statements on the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors and the assessment of carcinomatosis, together with a summary of the evidence supporting each statement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - F Planchamp
- Clinical Research Unit, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
| | - T Bourne
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - C Landolfo
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - A du Bois
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - L Chiva
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Clinic of Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - D Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - N Concin
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - D Fischerova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - W Froyman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Gallardo
- Department of Radiology, University Clinic of Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - B Lemley
- Patient Representative, President of Kraefti Underlivet (KIU), Denmark
- Chair Clinical Trial Project of the European Network of Gynaecological Cancer Advocacy Groups, ENGAGe
| | - A Loft
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - L Mereu
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - P Morice
- Department of Gynaecological Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - D Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - A C Testa
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - I Vergote
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - V Vandecaveye
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Division of Translational MRI, Department of Imaging & Pathology KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Scambia
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - C Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Salvador S, Scott S, Glanc P, Eiriksson L, Jang JH, Sebastianelli A, Dean E. Guideline No. 403: Initial Investigation and Management of Adnexal Masses. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2021; 42:1021-1029.e3. [PMID: 32736853 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.08.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To aid primary care physicians, emergency medicine physicians, and gynaecologists in the initial investigation of adnexal masses, defined as lumps that appear near the uterus or in or around ovaries, fallopian tubes, or surrounding connective tissue, and to outline recommendations for identifying women who would benefit from a referral to a gynaecologic oncologist for further management. INTENDED USERS Gynaecologists, obstetricians, family physicians, general surgeons, emergency medicine specialists, radiologists, sonographers, nurses, medical learners, residents, and fellows. TARGET POPULATION Adult women 18 years of age and older presenting for the evaluation of an adnexal mass. OPTIONS Women with adnexal masses should be assessed for personal risk factors, history, and physical findings. Initial evaluation should also include imaging and laboratory testing to triage women for management of their care either by a gynaecologic oncologist or as per SOGC guideline no. 404 on the initial investigation and management of benign ovarian masses. EVIDENCE A search of PubMed, Cochrane Wiley, and the Cochrane systematic reviews was conducted in January 2018 for English-language materials involving human subjects published since 2000 using three sets of terms: (i) ovarian cancer, ovarian carcinoma, adnexal disease, ovarian neoplasm, adnexal mass, fallopian tube disease, fallopian tube neoplasm, ovarian cyst, and ovarian tumour; (ii) the above terms in combination with predict neoplasm staging, follow-up, and staging; and (iii) the above two sets of terms in combination with ultrasound, tumour marker, CA 125, CEA, CA19-9, HE4, multivariable-index-assay, risk-of-ovarian-malignancy-algorithm, risk-of-malignancy-index, diagnostic imaging, CT, MRI, and PET. Relevant evidence was selected for inclusion in descending order of quality of evidence as follows: meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, observational studies, non-systematic reviews, case series, and reports. Additional articles were identified through cross-referencing the identified reviews. The total number of studies identified was 2350, with 59 being included in this review. VALIDATION METHODS The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed upon by the authors. The Executive and Board of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada reviewed the content and submitted comments for consideration. The Board of Directors of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada approved the final draft for publication. The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework (Table A1 of Online Appendix A). See Table A2 of Online Appendix A for the interpretation of strong and weak recommendations. The summary of findings is available upon request. BENEFITS, HARMS, COSTS Adnexal masses are common, and guidelines on how to triage them and manage the care of patients presenting with adnexal masses will continue to guide the practice of primary care providers and gynaecologists. Ovarian cancer outcomes are improved when initial surgery is performed by a gynaecologic oncologist, likely as a result of complete surgical staging and optimal cytoreduction. Given these superior outcomes, guidelines to assist in the triage of adnexal masses and the referral and management of the care of patients with an adnexal mass are critical. SUMMARY STATEMENTS (GRADE RATINGS IN PARENTHESES) RECOMMENDATIONS (GRADE RATINGS IN PARENTHESES).
Collapse
|
34
|
Timmerman D, Planchamp F, Bourne T, Landolfo C, du Bois A, Chiva L, Cibula D, Concin N, Fischerova D, Froyman W, Gallardo Madueño G, Lemley B, Loft A, Mereu L, Morice P, Querleu D, Testa AC, Vergote I, Vandecaveye V, Scambia G, Fotopoulou C. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:961-982. [PMID: 34112736 PMCID: PMC8273689 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group, and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based statements on the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors, including imaging techniques, biomarkers, and prediction models. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE nominated a multidisciplinary international group, including expert practising clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors and management of patients with ovarian cancer (19 experts across Europe). A patient representative was also included in the group. To ensure that the statements were evidence-based, the current literature was reviewed and critically appraised. Preliminary statements were drafted based on the review of the relevant literature. During a conference call, the whole group discussed each preliminary statement and a first round of voting was carried out. Statements were removed when a consensus among group members was not obtained. The voters had the opportunity to provide comments/suggestions with their votes. The statements were then revised accordingly. Another round of voting was carried out according to the same rules to allow the whole group to evaluate the revised version of the statements. The group achieved consensus on 18 statements. This Consensus Statement presents these ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE statements on the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors and the assessment of carcinomatosis, together with a summary of the evidence supporting each statement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Timmerman
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium .,Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Tom Bourne
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Metabolism Digestion and Reproduction, Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Chiara Landolfo
- Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Luis Chiva
- Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Clinic of Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Cibula
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Nicole Concin
- Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Daniela Fischerova
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Wouter Froyman
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Birthe Lemley
- European Network of Gynaecological Cancers Advocacy Groups (ENGAGe) Executive Group, Prague, Czech Republic.,KIU - Patient Organisation for Women with Gynaecological Cancer, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Annika Loft
- Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Liliana Mereu
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Philippe Morice
- Gynaecological Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Denis Querleu
- Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Antonia Carla Testa
- Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vincent Vandecaveye
- Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Division of Translational MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Timmerman D, Planchamp F, Bourne T, Landolfo C, du Bois A, Chiva L, Cibula D, Concin N, Fischerova D, Froyman W, Gallardo G, Lemley B, Loft A, Mereu L, Morice P, Querleu D, Testa C, Vergote I, Vandecaveye V, Scambia G, Fotopoulou C. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2021; 13:107-130. [PMID: 34107646 PMCID: PMC8291986 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.13.2.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based statements on the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours, including imaging techniques, biomarkers and prediction models. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE nominated a multidisciplinary international group, including expert practising clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours and management of patients with ovarian cancer (19 experts across Europe). A patient representative was also included in the group. To ensure that the statements were evidence-based, the current literature was reviewed and critically appraised. Preliminary statements were drafted based on the review of the relevant literature. During a conference call, the whole group discussed each preliminary statement and a first round of voting was carried out. Statements were removed when a consensus among group members was not obtained. The voters had the opportunity to provide comments/suggestions with their votes. The statements were then revised accordingly. Another round of voting was carried out according to the same rules to allow the whole group to evaluate the revised version of the statements. The group achieved consensus on 18 statements. This Consensus Statement presents these ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE statements on the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours and the assessment of carcinomatosis, together with a summary of the evidence supporting each statement.
Collapse
|
36
|
Current update on malignant epithelial ovarian tumors. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:2264-2280. [PMID: 34089360 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03081-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) represents the most frequently occurring gynecological malignancy, accounting for more than 70% of ovarian cancer deaths. Preoperative imaging plays an important role in assessing the extent of disease and guides the next step in surgical decision-making and operative planning. In this article, we will review the multimodality imaging features of various subtypes of EOC. We will also discuss the role of imaging in the staging, management, and surveillance of EOC.
Collapse
|
37
|
Ladegaard Baun ML, Dueholm M, Heje HN, Hamilton W, Petersen LK, Vedsted P. Direct access from general practice to transvaginal ultrasound for early detection of ovarian cancer: a feasibility study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2021; 39:230-239. [PMID: 34092179 PMCID: PMC8293964 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1922831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the feasibility of providing general practitioners (GPs) direct and fast referral access to transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS). DESIGN A prospective cohort study. SETTING A total of 232 Danish general practices in parts of the Central Denmark Region. SUBJECTS Women aged ≥40 years who consulted their GP for vague and non-specific symptoms (n = 479). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The feasibility assessment included the GPs' referral rate, indications for referral, management of test results, and findings from TVUS. RESULTS A total of 479 women were referred to TVUS. The examinations revealed abnormalities in 104 (21.7%) women. Additional investigations were needed in 68 (14.2%) women of whom seven (1.5%) underwent major surgery. No case of ovarian cancer was diagnosed during the study period or the 6-month follow-up. However, three (0.6%) women with an abnormal transvaginal ultrasound were diagnosed with urogynecological cancer; this yielded a PPV of 4.4% (95% confidence interval: 1.5-12.2) and an NPV of 100.0% (95% confidence interval: 96.7-100.0) for urogynecological cancer. CONCLUSION Providing GPs with direct access to transvaginal ultrasound was feasible; 80% of the investigated women were referred back to the GP, 14% were further investigated, 0.6% were diagnosed with urogynecological cancer, and 1.5% had major procedures performed without complications. IMPLICATIONS Direct access to TVUS could be an important pathway to ensure fast evaluation of women presenting with vague non-specific symptoms of potential ovarian cancer. Future studies should explore the patient experience, cancer outcomes, and health economics issues.KEY POINTS Current awareness • GPs have no fast referral option for women presenting with vague non-specific symptoms that could indicate underlying ovarian cancer. Key findings • We offered GPs direct and fast referral access to TVUS; 51.7% of practices used the opportunity. • The GPs referred 479 women to TVUS; 104 had an abnormal TVUS and 68 needed additional investigations. • Seven women underwent major surgery, leading to three cases of urogynecological cancer. No woman had a false negative TVUS result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Louise Ladegaard Baun
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Research Unit for General Practice – Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Margit Dueholm
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - William Hamilton
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Lone Kjeld Petersen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Peter Vedsted
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Research Unit for General Practice – Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mulder EE, Gelderblom ME, Schoot D, Vergeldt TFM, Nijssen DL, Piek JMJ. External validation of Risk of Malignancy Index compared to IOTA Simple Rules. Acta Radiol 2021; 62:673-678. [PMID: 32567319 DOI: 10.1177/0284185120933990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mathematical predictive models for ovarian tumors have an advantage over subjective assessment due to their relative simplicity, and therefore usefulness for less experienced sonographers. It is currently unclear which predictive model is best at predicting the nature of an ovarian tumor. PURPOSE To compare the diagnostic predictive accuracy of the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis Simple Rules (IOTA SR) with Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI), to differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 202 women diagnosed with ovarian tumor(s) were included. Preoperatively, patients were examined through transvaginal ultrasonography and CA-125 (U/mL) levels were measured. RMI and IOTA SR were determined, and where possible compared to definitive histopathological diagnosis. RESULTS Of the 202 women with ovarian tumors, 168 women were included in this cohort study. Of these tumors, 118 (70.2%) were benign, 17 (10.1%) were borderline, and 33 (19.7%) were malignant. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for the RMI were 72.0%, 90.7%, and 0.896, respectively. For the IOTA SR, these were 90.0%, 68.6%, and 0.793, respectively. CONCLUSION This cohort study shows that the RMI is a relatively useful diagnostic model in characterizing ovarian tumors, compared to the IOTA SR. However, due to the relatively low sensitivity of the RMI and high rate of inconclusive results of the IOTA SR, both diagnostic tests do not seem discriminative enough. Therefore, alternative diagnostic models are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmee E Mulder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Malou E Gelderblom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Dick Schoot
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Women’s Clinic, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tineke FM Vergeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Donna L Nijssen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Jurgen MJ Piek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sadowski EA, Maturen KE, Rockall A, Reinhold C, Addley H, Jha P, Bharwani N, Thomassin-Naggara I. Ovary: MRI characterisation and O-RADS MRI. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210157. [PMID: 33929901 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Ultrasound has a high specificity for the diagnosis of a benign lesion in cases of classic appearing simple cyst, hemorrhagic cyst, endometrioma and dermoid. However, ultrasound can sometimes be limited for definitive characterisation and risk stratification of other types of lesions, including those with echogenic content that may appear solid, with or without blood flow. Frequently, MRI can be used to further characterise these types of lesions, due to its ability to distinguish solid tissue from non-tissue solid components such as fat, blood, or debris. Incorporating the MR imaging into the evaluation of adnexal lesions can improve diagnostic certainty and guide clinical management potentially avoiding inappropriate surgery for benign lesions and expediting appropriate treatment for malignant lesions, particularly in the females with sonographically indeterminate adnexal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Sadowski
- Departments of Radiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Katherine E Maturen
- Department of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Andrea Rockall
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline Reinhold
- McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Helen Addley
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Priyanka Jha
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nishat Bharwani
- Department of Radiology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Phinyo P, Patumanond J, Saenrungmuaeng P, Chirdchim W, Pipanmekaporn T, Tantraworasin A, Tongsong T, Tantipalakorn C. Diagnostic Added-Value of Serum CA-125 on the IOTA Simple Rules and Derivation of Practical Combined Prediction Models (IOTA SR X CA-125). Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11020173. [PMID: 33530385 PMCID: PMC7912113 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic added-value of serum CA-125 to the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules in order to facilitate differentiation between malignant and benign ovarian tumors before surgery. Methods: A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional cohort of women scheduled for surgery in Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital between April 2010 and March 2018 was carried out. Demographic and clinical data were prospectively collected. Histopathologic diagnosis was used as the reference standard. Logistic regression was used for development of the model. Evaluation of the diagnostic added-value was based on the increment of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC). Results: One hundred and forty-five women (30.3%) out of a total of 479 with adnexal masses had malignant ovarian tumors. The model that included information from the IOTA Simple Rules and serum CA-125 was significantly more superior to the model that used only information from the IOTA Simple Rules (AuROC 0.95 vs. 0.89, p < 0.001 for pre-menopause and AuROC 0.98 vs 0.83, p < 0.001 for post-menopause). Conclusions: The IOTA SR X CA-125 model showed high discriminative ability and is potentially useful as a decision tool for guiding patient referrals to oncologic specialists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phichayut Phinyo
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand;
| | - Jayanton Patumanond
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand;
| | - Panprapha Saenrungmuaeng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand;
| | - Watcharin Chirdchim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Phrapokklao Hospital, Chanthaburi 22000, Thailand;
| | - Tanyong Pipanmekaporn
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand;
| | - Apichat Tantraworasin
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand;
| | - Theera Tongsong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
- Correspondence: (T.T.); (C.T.); Tel.: +66-53-93-6429 (T.T. & C.T.)
| | - Charuwan Tantipalakorn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
- Correspondence: (T.T.); (C.T.); Tel.: +66-53-93-6429 (T.T. & C.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Reinhold C, Rockall A, Sadowski EA, Siegelman ES, Maturen KE, Vargas HA, Forstner R, Glanc P, Andreotti RF, Thomassin-Naggara I. Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Lexicon for MRI: A White Paper of the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data Systems MRI Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 18:713-729. [PMID: 33484725 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
MRI is used in the evaluation of ovarian and adnexal lesions. MRI can further characterize lesions seen on ultrasound to help decrease the number of false-positive lesions and avoid unnecessary surgery in benign lesions. Currently, the reporting of ovarian and adnexal findings on MRI is inconsistent because of the lack of standardized descriptor terminology. The development of uniform reporting descriptors can lead to improved interpretation agreement and communication between radiologists and referring physicians. The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data Systems MRI Committee was formed under the direction of the ACR to create a standardized lexicon for adnexal lesions with the goal of improving the quality and consistency of imaging reports. This white paper describes the consensus process in the creation of a standardized lexicon for ovarian and adnexal lesions for MRI and the resultant lexicon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Reinhold
- Codirector, Augmented Intelligence & Precision Health Laboratory of the Research Institute of McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
| | - Andrea Rockall
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London and Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth A Sadowski
- Departments of Radiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Evan S Siegelman
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Katherine E Maturen
- Departments of Radiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Rosemarie Forstner
- Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Salzburg, PMU Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Phyllis Glanc
- University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Science Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rochelle F Andreotti
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
- Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Tenon, Service d'Imagerie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Phinyo P, Patumanond J, Saenrungmuaeng P, Chirdchim W, Pipanmekaporn T, Tantraworasin A, Tongsong T, Tantipalakorn C. Transferability of the early-stage ovarian malignancy (EOM) score: an external validation study that includes advanced-stage and metastatic ovarian cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 303:1539-1548. [PMID: 33420815 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05955-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To validate the diagnostic performance of the Early-stage Ovarian Malignancy (EOM) score in an external dataset that includes advanced-stage and metastatic ovarian cancer. METHODS The data from two cross-sectional cohorts were used in the statistical analysis. The development dataset of the EOM score was collected in Phrapokklao Hospital between September 2013 and December 2017. The validation dataset was collected in Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital between April 2010 and March 2018. The internal and external performance of the EOM score was evaluated in terms of discrimination via area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AuROC) and calibration. RESULTS There were 270 and 479 patients included in the development and validation datasets, respectively. The prevalence of ovarian malignancy was 20.0% (54/270) in the development set and 30.3% (145/479) in the validation set. The EOM score had excellent discriminative ability in both the development and validation sets (AuROC 88.0 (95% CI 82.6, 93.9) and 88.0 (95% CI 84.3, 91.4), respectively). The EOM score also showed good calibration in both datasets. CONCLUSIONS The EOM score had consistent diagnostic performance in the external validation data. It is recommended for use as a triage tool in patient referrals instead of the RMI in settings where experienced sonographers are not available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phichayut Phinyo
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.,Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Jayanton Patumanond
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Panprapha Saenrungmuaeng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, Thailand
| | - Watcharin Chirdchim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Phrapokklao Hospital, Chanthaburi, Thailand
| | - Tanyong Pipanmekaporn
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.,Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Apichat Tantraworasin
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Theera Tongsong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
| | - Charuwan Tantipalakorn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Early-Stage Ovarian Malignancy Score versus Risk of Malignancy Indices: Accuracy and Clinical Utility for Preoperative Diagnosis of Women with Adnexal Masses. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 56:medicina56120702. [PMID: 33339091 PMCID: PMC7765501 DOI: 10.3390/medicina56120702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Background and objectives: To compare the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of the Early-stage Ovarian Malignancy (EOM) score with the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) in the presurgical assessment of women presenting with adnexal masses. Materials and Methods: A secondary analysis was carried out in a retrospective cohort of women who presented with an adnexal mass and were scheduled for surgery at Phrapokklao Hospital between September 2013 and December 2017. The clinical characteristics, ultrasonographic features of the masses, and preoperative CA-125 levels were recorded. The EOM and the RMI score were calculated and compared in terms of accuracy and clinical utility. Decision curve analysis (DCA), which examined the net benefit (NB) of applying the EOM and the RMI in practice at a range of threshold probabilities, was presented. Results: In this study, data from 270 patients were analyzed. Fifty-four (20.0%) women in the sample had early-stage ovarian cancer. All four RMI versions demonstrated a lower sensitivity for the detection of patients with early-stage ovarian cancer compared to an EOM score ≥ 15. An EOM ≥ 15 resulted in a higher proportion of net true positive or NB than all versions of the RMIs from a threshold probability of 5% to 30%. Conclusions: It also showed a higher capability to reduce the number of inappropriate referrals than the RMIs at a threshold probability between 5% and 30%. The EOM score showed higher diagnostic sensitivity and has the potential to be clinically more useful than the RMIs to triage women who present with adnexal masses for referral to oncologic gynecologists. Further external validation is required to support our findings.
Collapse
|
44
|
Giamougiannis P, Morais CLM, Grabowska R, Ashton KM, Wood NJ, Martin-Hirsch PL, Martin FL. A comparative analysis of different biofluids towards ovarian cancer diagnosis using Raman microspectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem 2020; 413:911-922. [PMID: 33242117 PMCID: PMC7808972 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-020-03045-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Revised: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Biofluids, such as blood plasma or serum, are currently being evaluated for cancer detection using vibrational spectroscopy. These fluids contain information of key biomolecules, such as proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and nucleic acids, that comprise spectrochemical patterns to differentiate samples. Raman is a water-free and practically non-destructive vibrational spectroscopy technique, capable of recording spectrochemical fingerprints of biofluids with minimum or no sample preparation. Herein, we compare the performance of these two common biofluids (blood plasma and serum) together with ascitic fluid, towards ovarian cancer detection using Raman microspectroscopy. Samples from thirty-eight patients were analysed (n = 18 ovarian cancer patients, n = 20 benign controls) through different spectral pre-processing and discriminant analysis techniques. Ascitic fluid provided the best class separation in both unsupervised and supervised discrimination approaches, where classification accuracies, sensitivities and specificities above 80% were obtained, in comparison to 60–73% with plasma or serum. Ascitic fluid appears to be rich in collagen information responsible for distinguishing ovarian cancer samples, where collagen-signalling bands at 1004 cm−1 (phenylalanine), 1334 cm−1 (CH3CH2 wagging vibration), 1448 cm−1 (CH2 deformation) and 1657 cm−1 (Amide I) exhibited high statistical significance for class differentiation (P < 0.001). The efficacy of vibrational spectroscopy, in particular Raman spectroscopy, combined with ascitic fluid analysis, suggests a potential diagnostic method for ovarian cancer. Raman microspectroscopy analysis of ascitic fluid allows for discrimination of patients with benign gynaecological conditions or ovarian cancer. ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Giamougiannis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, PR2 9HT, UK.,School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK
| | - Camilo L M Morais
- School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK
| | - Rita Grabowska
- School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK
| | - Katherine M Ashton
- Department of Pathology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, PR2 9HT, UK
| | - Nicholas J Wood
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, PR2 9HT, UK
| | - Pierre L Martin-Hirsch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, PR2 9HT, UK
| | - Francis L Martin
- School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK. .,Biocel Ltd, Hull, HU10 7TS, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Leandersson P, Åkesson A, Hedenfalk I, Malander S, Borgfeldt C. A multiplex biomarker assay improves the diagnostic performance of HE4 and CA125 in ovarian tumor patients. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240418. [PMID: 33075095 PMCID: PMC7571712 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Survival in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains poor. Most patients are diagnosed in late stages. Early diagnosis increases the chance of survival. We used the proximity extension assay from Olink Proteomics to search for new protein biomarkers with the potential to improve the diagnostic performance of CA125 and HE4 in patients with ovarian tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS Plasma samples were obtained from 180 women with ovarian tumors; 30 cases of benign tumor, 28 cases with borderline tumors, 25 early EOC cases (FIGO stage I) and 97 advanced EOC cases (FIGO stages II-IV). Proteins were measured using the Olink® Oncology II and Inflammation panels. For statistical analyses, patients were categorized into benign tumors versus cancer and benign tumors versus borderline + cancer, respectively. RESULTS We analyzed 177 biomarkers. Thirty-four proteins had ROC AUC > 0.7 for discrimination between benign tumors and cancer. Fifteen proteins had ROC AUC > 0.7 for discrimination between benign tumors and borderline tumors + cancer. HE4 ranked highest for both comparisons. A reference model with HE4, CA125 and age (AUC 0.838 for benign tumors vs. cancer and AUC 0.770 for benign tumors vs. borderline tumors + cancer) was compared to the reference model with the addition of each of the remaining proteins with AUC > 0.7. ITGAV was the only individual biomarker found to improve diagnostic performance of the reference model, to AUC 0.874 for benign tumors vs. cancer and AUC 0.818 for benign tumors vs. borderline tumors + cancer (p < 0.05). Cross-validation and LASSO regression was combined to select multiple biomarker combinations. The best performing model for discrimination between benign tumors and borderline tumors + cancer was a 6-biomarker combination (HE4, CA125, ITGAV, CXCL1, CEACAM1, IL-10RB) and age (AUC 0.868, sensitivity 0.86 and specificity 0.82, p = 0.016 for comparison with the reference model). CONCLUSION HE4 was the best performing individual biomarker for discrimination between benign ovarian tumors and EOC including borderline tumors. The addition of other carcinogenesis-related biomarkers in a multiplex biomarker panel can improve the diagnostic performance of the established biomarkers HE4 and CA125.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pia Leandersson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, Reproductive Medicine Center, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Malmo, Sweden
- * E-mail:
| | - Anna Åkesson
- Clinical Studies Sweden–Forum South, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Hedenfalk
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Susanne Malander
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden
| | - Christer Borgfeldt
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Pereira PN, Sarian LO, Yoshida A, Araújo KG, Silva ACB, de Oliveira Barros RH, Jales RM, Derchain S. Improving the performance of IOTA simple rules: sonographic assessment of adnexal masses with resource-effective use of a magnetic resonance scoring (ADNEX MR scoring system). Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:3218-3229. [PMID: 31482379 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02207-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules, simple rules risk ultrasound models, alone or in combination with magnetic resonance (MR) score to predict malignancy in women with adnexal masses. METHODS 171 women with adnexal masses were included from February 2014 to February 2016. 120 women had histopathological diagnosis obtained from surgery or percutaneous biopsy. The other 51 women were submitted to surveillance with ultrasound (US) for at least 1 year. Patients were examined with US and MR. US reports were rendered using IOTA systems. We compared five diagnostic approaches, aimed at diagnosing women with malignant tumors among those with adnexal masses: We calculated the performance and net benefits (decision curve analysis) for five distinct diagnostic approaches: (1) US simple rules (SR), (2) simple rules risk score (SRRisk), (3) US SR followed by subjective assessment (SA) of indeterminate cases, (4) SR followed by MR score for the indeterminate cases, and (5) MR score for all women. RESULTS The MR score for all patients was the approach that yielded the best-standardized net benefit regardless of the risk threshold. However, referring women with indeterminate masses on SR to MR score yielded the second-best net benefit. CONCLUSION Although this study leaves no doubt about the superiority of MR score over US-based methods for the discrimination of malignant tumors in women with adnexal masses, restricting the use of MR score only to women with indeterminate masses on US SR is a safe, appropriate way to triage women with adnexal masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Nunes Pereira
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil
- Section of Imaging, Sumaré State Hospital, Affiliated to State University of Campinas, Sumaré, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luís Otavio Sarian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil
| | - Adriana Yoshida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil.
| | - Karla Galvão Araújo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil
| | - Ana Carolina Baião Silva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil
| | | | - Rodrigo Menezes Jales
- Section of Ultrasonography, Women's Hospital, CAISM, State University of Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sophie Derchain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Solanki V, Singh P, Sharma C, Ghuman N, Sureka B, Shekhar S, Gothwal M, Yadav G. Predicting Malignancy in Adnexal Masses by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis-Simple Rules. J Midlife Health 2020; 11:217-223. [PMID: 33767562 PMCID: PMC7978049 DOI: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_103_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate prediction of adnexal tumors preoperatively is critical for optimal management of ovarian cancers. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Algorithms (IOTA) is a newer tool to characterize adnexal masses as benign or malignant. OBJECTIVE This study is aimed to predict malignancy in adnexal masses and differentiates benign from malignant, applying the sonography features of simple rules given by IOTA. METHODOLOGY A prospective study was carried out at AIIMS Jodhpur for 1½ years. Women presenting with adnexal masses planned for surgery were recruited. Ultrasonography-transabdominal combined with transvaginal was done, and pelvic masses were characterized using IOTA simple rules. Patients underwent their planned surgery. Histopathology is considered the gold standard and was compared with the IOTA simple rules. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. RESULTS One hundred and seventy-four women were included in the study, of which the majority (82.75%) were benign, the rest being frankly malignant or borderline cancer. The sensitivity of IOTA is 96.6%, specificity of 92.3%, PPV of 72.5%, NPV of 99.2%, where indeterminate cases were considered malignant. CONCLUSION IOTA simple rule is an effective tool for identifying malignant adnexal masses. It also suggests that IOTA-simple rules can be used as a diagnostic criterion for differentiating adnexal masses into benign and malignant on an out-patient department basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vrushti Solanki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Pratibha Singh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Charu Sharma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Navdeep Ghuman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Binit Sureka
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Shashank Shekhar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Meenakshi Gothwal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Garima Yadav
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Clinically Suspected Adnexal Mass, No Acute Symptoms. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 16:S77-S93. [PMID: 31054761 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
There are approximately 9.1 pelvic surgeries performed for every histologically confirmed adnexal malignancy in the United States, compared to 2.3 surgeries per malignancy (in oncology centers) and 5.9 surgeries per malignancy (in other centers) in Europe. An important prognostic factor in the long-term survival in patients with ovarian malignancy is the initial management by a gynecological oncologist. With high accuracy of imaging for adnexal mass characterization and consequent appropriate triage to subspecialty referral, the better use of gynecologic oncology can improve treatment outcomes. Ultrasound, including transabdominal, transvaginal, and duplex ultrasound, combined with MRI with contrast can diagnose adnexal masses as benign with specific features (ie, functional masses, dermoid, endometrioma, fibroma, pedunculated fibroid, hydrosalpinx, peritoneal inclusion cyst, Tarlov cyst), malignant, or indeterminate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
|
49
|
Basha MAA, Metwally MI, Gamil SA, Khater HM, Aly SA, El Sammak AA, Zaitoun MMA, Khattab EM, Azmy TM, Alayouty NA, Mohey N, Almassry HN, Yousef HY, Ibrahim SA, Mohamed EA, Mohamed AEM, Afifi AHM, Harb OA, Algazzar HY. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses. Eur Radiol 2020; 31:674-684. [PMID: 32809166 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07143-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The American College of Radiology (ACR) recently published the ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system (O-RADS) to provide guidelines to physicians who interpret ultrasound (US) examinations of adnexal masses (AM). This study aimed to compare the O-RADS with two other well-established US classification systems for diagnosis of AM. METHODS This retrospective multicenter study between May 2016 and December 2019 assessed consecutive women with AM detected by the US. Five experienced consultant radiologists independently categorized each AM according to O-RADS, gynecologic imaging reporting and data system (GI-RADS), and international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) simple rules. Pathology and adequate follow-up were used as reference standards for calculating the validity of three US classification systems for diagnosis of AM. Kappa statistics were used to assess the inter-reviewer agreement (IRA). RESULTS A total of 609 women (mean age, 48 ± 13.7 years; range, 18-72 years) with 647 AM were included. Of the 647 AM, 178 were malignant and 469 were benign. Malignancy rates were comparable to recommended rates by previous literature in O-RADS and IOTA, but higher in GI-RADS. O-RADS had significantly higher sensitivity for malignancy than GI-RAD and IOTA (p = 0.003 and 0.0007, respectively), but non-significant slightly lower specificity (p > 0.05). O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA showed similar overall IRA (κ = 0.77, 0.69, and 0.63, respectively) with a tendency toward higher IRA with O-RADS than with GI-RADS and IOTA. CONCLUSIONS O-RADS compares favorably with GI-RADS and IOTA. O-RADS had higher sensitivity than GI-RADS and IOTA simple rules with relatively similar specificity and reliability. KEY POINTS • The malignancy rates were comparable to recommended rates by previous literature in O-RADS and IOTA, but higher in GI-RADS. • The O-RADS had significantly higher sensitivity for malignancy than GI-RADS and IOTA (96.8% vs 92.7% and 92.1%; p = 0.003 and 0.0007, respectively), but non-significant slightly lower specificity (92.8% vs 93.6% and 93.2%, respectively; p > 0.05). • The O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA showed similar overall inter-reviewer agreement (IRA) (κ = 0.77, 0.69, and 0.63, respectively), with a tendency toward higher IRA with O-RADS than with GI-RADS and IOTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Shrif A Gamil
- Department of Radio-diagnosis, Al-Ahrar Teaching Hospital, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Hamada M Khater
- Department of Radio-diagnosis, Benha University, Benha, Egypt
| | | | | | | | - Enass M Khattab
- Department of Radio-diagnosis, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Taghreed M Azmy
- Department of Radio-diagnosis, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | | | - Nesreen Mohey
- Department of Radio-diagnosis, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | | | - Hala Y Yousef
- Department of Radio-diagnosis, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Safaa A Ibrahim
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Ekramy A Mohamed
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | | | | | - Ola A Harb
- Department of Pathology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Directive clinique no 403 : Évaluation initiale et prise en charge des masses annexielles. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2020; 42:1030-1039.e3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|