Dual Biologic and Small Molecule Therapy for the Treatment of Refractory Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Combined Advanced Targeted Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: An Extensive Update

This article discusses the rationale for and the current data on the efficacy and safety of combined advanced targeted therapy (CATT) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease.

STEP-CD study: ustekinumab use in paediatric Crohn's disease-a multicentre retrospective study from paediatric IBD Porto group of ESPGHAN

Ustekinumab is an effective therapy for adult Crohn's disease (CD), but data in paediatric CD patients are scarce. The aim of the study was to describe the real-life effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in paediatric CD. This is a multicentre review of children with Crohn's disease treated with ustekinumab. The aim of our study was to describe the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in paediatric real-life practice. This is a study of the Paediatric IBD (inflammatory bowel disease) Porto group of ESPGHAN. Corticosteroid (CS)- and exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN)-free remission, defined as weighted Paediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (wPCDAI) < 12.5, and physician global assessment (PGA) were determined at weeks 12 and 52. A total of 101 children were included at a median age of 15.4 years (IQR 12.7-17.2) with a median follow-up of 7.4 months (IQR 5.6-11.8). Ninety-nine percent had received prior anti-TNF, 63% ≥ 2 anti-TNFα therapies and 22% vedolizumab. Baseline median wPCDAI was 39 (IQR 25-57.5) (71 (70%) patients with moderate-severe activity). Weeks 12 and 52 CS- and EEN-free remission were both 40.5%. Clinical response at week 6, iv induction route and older age at onset of ustekinumab treatment were predictive factors associated with clinical remission at week 12. Seven minor adverse events probably related to ustekinumab were reported. One patient died from an unrelated cause.    Conclusion: Our results suggest that ustekinumab is effective and safe in children with chronically active or refractory CD. What is Known: • Ustekinumab is an effective therapy for adult moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). • Off-label use of ustekinumab in children is increasing especially in anti-TNF refractory CD. What is New: • Is the largest cohort of real-world use of ustekinumab in paediatric CD to date. • Clinical response at week 6, iv induction and older age at onset of ustekinumab were predictive factors associated with clinical response at week 12.

IBD Matchmaking - Rational Combination Therapy

A growing number of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis have disease that is refractory to multiple advanced therapies, have undergone multiple surgeries, and require further treatment options. For this reason, there has been increasing use of multiple simultaneous advanced targeted therapies. Although the knowledge on combined advanced targeted therapy (CATT) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been largely limited to observational data and early-phase randomized controlled trials, combination of therapies is commonplace in many other diseases. This review discusses conceptual frameworks of CATT in IBD, provides context of combined therapies in other diseases, provides current evidence for CATT in IBD, and projects future applications and positioning of CATT using existing, novel, and orthogonal mechanisms of action. CATT aims to address the need to overcome low efficacy rates and frequent loss of response of current individual therapies. Both treatment exposure and disease duration are major determinants of response to therapy. Identification of safe and effective CATT may impact positioning of this strategy to apply to a broader IBD population.

Combination biologic therapy in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: Safety and efficacy over a minimum 12-month follow-up period

OBJECTIVES

The severe course of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) refractory to advanced therapies in children results in the search for new therapeutic methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dual therapy with biologics in a cohort of children with IBD.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of data from 29 children with a diagnosis of IBD, 19 with ulcerative colitis (66%), 10 with Crohn's disease (CD) (34%) qualified for dual biological therapy (DBT). The median age of patients was five (interquartile range [IQR], 1-15) years at diagnosis of IBD and 14 (IQR, 3-17) years at eligibility for dual therapy. Thirteen (45%) patients were treated with vedolizumab/adalimumab (VDZ + ADA), 13 (45%) with ustekinumab/adalimumab (UST + ADA), three (10%) with infliximab/vedolizumab (IFX + VDZ).

RESULTS

Clinical remission was achieved in 13 (45%; seven UC and six CD) and 12 (41%; seven UC and five CD) Pediatric Weighted Crohn's Disease Activity Index (wPCDAI)/Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI) patients after 4 and 12 months at the initiation of dual therapy. Clinical response based on wPCDAI/PUCAI was reported in 16 (55%; nine UC and seven CD) and 12 (41% seven UC and five CD) children after 4 and 12 months of follow-up, respectively. The median fecal calprotectin decreased significantly from 1240 µg/g (53-10,100) to 160 µg/g (5-2500; p = 0.004) between baseline and Month 4 and from 749 at baseline (57-10,100) to 17 (5-3110; p = 0.12) over 12 months. Moreover, 34% (six UC and four CD) of patients achieved endoscopic remission.

CONCLUSIONS

DBT seems to be an effective alternative therapeutic option for patients with moderate and severe IBD.

Tofacitinib in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Multicenter Experience

BACKGROUND

Tofacitinib has recently been approved for treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) in adults, yet pediatric data are limited. This international multicenter study describes the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in pediatric UC.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of children diagnosed with UC treated with tofacitinib from 16 pediatric centers internationally. The primary outcome was week 8 corticosteroid-free clinical remission (Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index <10). Secondary outcomes were clinical response (≥20-point decrease in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index) at week 8, corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 24, and colectomy rate and adverse safety events through to last follow-up. The primary outcome was calculated by the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

We included 101 children with a mean age at diagnosis of 12.8 ± 2.8 years and a median disease duration of 20 months (interquartile range [IQR], 10-39 months). All had treatment failure with at least 1 biologic agent, and 36 (36%) had treatment failure with 3 agents. Median follow-up was 24 weeks (IQR, 16-54 weeks). Sixteen (16%) children achieved corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 8, and an additional 30 (30%) demonstrated clinical response. Twenty (23%) of 88 children achieved corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 24. A total of 25 (25%) children underwent colectomy by median 86 days (IQR, 36-130 days). No serious drug-related adverse events were reported; there was 1 case of herpes zoster and 2 cases of minor blood test perturbations.

CONCLUSIONS

In this largest real-life pediatric cohort to date, tofacitinib was effective in at least 16% of patients with highly refractory UC by week 8. Adverse events were minor and largely consistent with adult data.

Tofacitinib in the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis in Colombian pediatric patients: Real world experience

INTRODUCTION

There are no studies on efficacy of tofacitinib for moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) in pediatric patients in Latin America. The aim of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety, in real world, treated with tofacitinib in our setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Case series of pediatric patients with UC who received treatment with tofacitinib in induction phase for 8 weeks and then maintenance therapy between November 2021 and February 2023.

RESULTS

Four female patients, median age 14.5 (SD 2.1; RIQ 12.5-16.5) years, all with prior biologic exposure, all 4 with prior use of anti-TNF, and 2/4 with prior use of anti-integrin. Clinical, biochemical and endoscopic remission was obtained in 3/4 at induction. Information was obtained from 3 patients in 6-month maintenance, 2/3 remained in clinical, biochemical and endoscopic remission and 1/3 has not achieved biochemical or endoscopic remission. Information was obtained from 1 patient in 12-month maintenance, achieving clinical and biochemical remission, however, endoscopic remission has not been achieved. One patient was initiated for severe acute UC with risk of colectomy, with significant improvement after 7 days, reaching therapeutic objectives at induction. No serious adverse events were reported in any of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy and safety are demonstrated with tofacitinib in pediatric patients. With high percentage of response in induction treatment, sustained over time, and safe. In the context of severe acute hospitalized UC, it has a role as a potential rescue therapy due to its rapid action.

Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: What's new and what has changed?

The incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is on the rise in North America and worldwide, with young children being the fastest growing patient population. It is therefore essential for pediatricians and pediatric sub-specialists to be able to recognize signs and symptoms suspicious for a new diagnosis of IBD, as well as potential complications associated with IBD or its treatment. This article reviews the most recent literature regarding clinical presentation, helpful diagnostic clues, newer monitoring tools being used by pediatric gastroenterologists, and emerging new biologic and small molecule treatments.

Diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic and relapsing immune-mediated disease of the gastrointestinal tract with a gradually increasing global incidence and prevalence. A prolonged course of IBD leads to a decline in patient quality of life and the creation of a substantial economic burden on society. Owing to the lack of specific diagnostic markers, the diagnosis of IBD still needs a gold standard based on a combination of clinical manifestations, imaging, laboratory, and endoscopic results. Accordingly, the current goals of IBD treatment are to alleviate clinical symptoms and reduce recurrence rates. Therefore, it is imperative to develop a standard set of procedures to diagnose and treat IBD. In this review, we summarize prominent and emerging studies, outline classical and contemporary approaches to diagnosing and managing IBD, and integrate multiple guidelines. Furthermore, we propose the possibility of establishing an early and comprehensive diagnostic workflow and personalized management strategy in the future. We aim to enhance the quality and standardization of diagnostic and treatment procedures for IBD.

Challenges in IBD Research 2024: Pragmatic Clinical Research

Pragmatic clinical research is 1 of the 5 focus areas of the Challenges in IBD Research 2024, a multidisciplinary effort by scientists, clinicians, patients, and funders to identify priorities for patient-centric research. This summary provides a comprehensive overview of current gaps in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinical research and actionable approaches to address them. This review is focused on identifying research that is needed to achieve the best outcomes for patients in clinical practice. Research gaps include understanding the needs of understudied patient groups and addressing barriers to care so all patients receive optimal care, validating and using biomarkers to enable early diagnosis and result in better outcomes for adults and children with IBD, and determining the optimal sequencing of treatments (medical, surgical, adjunct) in children and adults. Inclusive pragmatic research is needed to address these gaps and lead to improvements in patient care and outcomes for all populations of patients with IBD.

Real-World Outcomes of Dual Advanced Therapy in Children and Young Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Data are limited on the safety and efficacy of combining advanced therapies for refractory patients with IBD.

AIM

To evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of dual advanced therapy (DAT), combining 2 biologics or a biologic with a small molecule, in children and young adults with refractory IBD.

METHODS

Primary outcome of this single IBD center cohort was DAT remission (clinical and biomarker remission) at first assessment (T1). Secondary outcomes included remission at T2, if DAT de-intensification (De-I) occurred and T3, if T2 DAT re-intensification (Re-I) occurred. Efficacy and safety outcomes were described.

RESULTS

Of the 30 patients [43% female, 30% CD, median age of 18.3 [15.1-19.8] years], all 11 UST + TOFA achieved T1 remission; 6/10 De-I failed at T2; and 4/4 Re-I achieved T3 remission. Of 9 VDZ + TOFA, 6 achieved T1 remission; 5/6 De-I failed at T2; and 1/1 failed T3 Re-I. Of 4 UST + VDZ, 3 achieved T1 remission; 2/3 De-I failed at T2; and 0 had Re-I. Of 5 UST + UPA, 4 achieved T1 remission; 1/5 De-I failed at T2 but recaptured T3 remission post-Re-I. One VDZ + OZA achieved T1 remission and maintained T2 remission post-De-I to OZA monotherapy. At last follow-up, 43% were on original DAT, 17% on one of original DAT, and 40% neither. One UST + TOFA patient developed mild leukopenia and another developed septic arthritis and venous thromboembolism on VDZ + TOFA and prednisone.

CONCLUSION

Most children and young adults treated with DAT achieved remission with minimal safety events; however, de-intensification had limited success.

Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and infliximab in biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

We conducted this multicenter, retrospective cohort study aiming to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) and infliximab (IFX) in biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

Biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC who were treated with IFX or VDZ for at least 14 weeks at three tertiary hospitals in southwest China between January 2021 and January 2023 were retrospectively included. Efficacy of the biologics was evaluated based on the steroid-free clinical remission rate, clinical remission rate, and mucosal healing rate at Weeks 14 and 52. Adverse events related to biologic use were recorded.

RESULTS

Altogether 122 biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC were included. No marked differences in the steroid-free clinical remission rate and clinical remission rate were observed between the two groups at Week 14 or Week 52 (P > 0.05). The VDZ group exhibited a higher mucosal healing rate at Week 14 compared to the IFX group (33.3% vs 16.9%, P = 0.036), while that at Week 52 did not differ between the two groups (65.6% vs 47.1%, P = 0.098). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the two groups (P = 0.071).

CONCLUSION

VDZ and IFX showed comparable clinical efficacy and safety profiles and can be used as viable first-line therapeutic options for biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

Treatment of non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

In the past two decades, the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has evolved markedly, owing to the availability of a growing number of novel, potent and relatively safe therapeutic agents and the shift of management strategies towards early achievement of disease remission. However, JIA encompasses a heterogeneous group of diseases that require distinct treatment approaches. Furthermore, some old drugs, such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine and intraarticular glucocorticoids, still maintain an important therapeutic role. In the past 5 years, information on the efficacy and safety of drug therapies for JIA has been further enriched through the accomplishment of several randomized controlled trials of newer biologic and synthetic targeted DMARDs. In addition, a more rational therapeutic approach has been fostered by the promulgation of therapeutic recommendations and guidelines. A multinational collaborative effort has led to the development of the recommendations for the treat-to-target strategy in JIA. There is currently increasing interest in establishing the optimal time and modality for discontinuation of treatment in children with JIA who achieve sustained clinical remission. The aim of this Review is to summarize the current evidence and discuss the therapeutic approaches to the management of non-systemic phenotypes of JIA, including oligoarthritis, polyarthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

Dual Biologic or Small Molecule Therapy in Refractory Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease (DOUBLE-PIBD): A Multicenter Study from the Pediatric IBD Porto Group of ESPGHAN

BACKGROUND

Current data on dual biologic therapy in children are limited. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dual therapy in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

A retrospective study from 14 centers affiliated with the Pediatric IBD Interest and Porto Groups of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. Included were children with IBD who underwent combinations of biologic agents or biologic and small molecule therapy for at least 3 months. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and imaging data were collected. Adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty-two children (35 Crohn's disease, 27 ulcerative colitis; median age 15.5 [interquartile range, 13.1-16.8] years) were included. They had all failed previous biologic therapies, and 47 (76%) failed at least 2 biologic agents. The dual therapy included an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent and vedolizumab in 30 children (48%), anti-tumor necrosis factor and ustekinumab in 21 (34%) children, vedolizumab and ustekinumab in 8 (13%) children, and tofacitinib with a biologic in 3 (5%) children. Clinical remission was observed in 21 (35%), 30 (50%), and 38 (63%) children at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Normalization of C-reactive protein and decrease in fecal calprotectin to <250 µg/g were achieved in 75% and 64%, respectively, at 12 months of follow-up. Twenty-nine (47%) children sustained adverse events, 8 of which were regarded as serious and led to discontinuation of therapy in 6.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual biologic therapy may be effective in children with refractory IBD. The potential efficacy should be weighed against the risk of serious adverse events.

Successful treatment of refractory enteritis and arthritis with combination of tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-6 inhibition in patients with ulcerative colitis

An 18 year-old man with autoimmune hepatitis-primary sclerosing cholangitis-overlap syndrome and ulcerative colitis was admitted due to relapsed enteritis and polyarthritis after cessation of infliximab. Colonoscopy and articular ultrasonography revealed large ulcers in the colon with crypt abscess in the specimens and active enthesitis and synovitis, respectively. His intestinitis was improved with golimumab but arthritis was persistent. Golimumab was switched to secukinumab, which was effective for arthritis. However, colitis was flared resulting in total colorectal resection. One month after colectomy, polyarthritis was relapsed. Tocilizumab ameliorated arthritis but enteritis emerged again, and switching tocilizumab to adalimumab improved enteritis but arthritis exacerbated. Finally, we restarted tocilizumab for arthritis with continued adalimumab for enteritis. The dual cytokine blocking strategy, tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 inhibition, subsided both of his refractory enteritis and arthritis and maintained remission for more than 3 years without any serious adverse event. Our case suggests that enteritis and arthritis in inflammatory bowel disease may be different in pathophysiology and raises the possible usefulness of simultaneous inhibition of two inflammatory cytokines in such cases.

Single-center Experience With Upadacitinib for Adolescents With Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Upadacitinib (UPA) is a novel selective JAK inhibitor approved for adults with ulcerative colitis (UC) and with positive phase 3 data for Crohn's disease (CD). Pediatric off-label use is common due to delays in pediatric approvals; real-world data on UPA are needed to understand the safety and effectiveness in pediatric IBD.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective case series study of adolescents (12-17 years) with inflammatory bowel disease IBD on UPA. The primary outcome was postinduction steroid-free clinical remission (SF-CR) defined as Pediatric UC Activity Index (PUCAI) or Pediatric CD Activity Index (PCDAI) ≤10. Secondary outcomes include postinduction clinical response (decrease ≥12.5 in PUCAI/PCDAI), postinduction C-reactive protein (CRP) normalization, 6-month SF-CR, and intestinal ultrasound response and remission. Adverse events were recorded through last follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (9 CD, 10 UC, 1 IBD-U; 55% female; median age 15 years, 90% ≥2 biologics) were treated with UPA for ≥12 weeks (median 51 [43-63] weeks). Upadacitinib was used as monotherapy in 55% and as combination with ustekinumab and vedolizumab in 35% and 10%, respectively. Week 12 SF-CR was achieved in 75% (15/20) and 80% (16/20) with CRP normalization. About 3/4 (14/19) achieved SF-CR at 6 months. Adverse event occurred in 2 patients (10%): Cytomegalovirus colitis requiring hospitalization and hyperlipidemia requiring no treatment. In the 75% with ultrasound monitoring, response and remission were achieved in 77% and 60%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While awaiting pediatric registration trials, our data suggest that UPA is effective in inducing and maintaining SF-CR in adolescents with highly-refractory IBD with an acceptable safety profile.

Precision medicine in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an incurable disease characterized by remission-relapse cycles throughout its course. Both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), the two main forms of IBD, exhibit tendency to develop complications and substantial heterogeneity in terms of frequency and severity of relapse, thus posing great challenges to the clinical management for IBD. Current treatment strategies are effective in different ways in induction and maintenance therapies for IBD. Recent advances in studies of genetics, pharmacogenetics, proteomics and microbiome provide a strong driving force for identifying molecular markers of prognosis and treatment response, which should help clinicians manage IBD patients more effectively, and then, improve clinical outcomes and reduce treatment costs of patients. In this review, we summarize and discuss precision medicine in IBD, focusing on predictive markers of disease course and treatment response, and monitoring indices during therapeutic drug monitoring.

A Review of Therapeutic Escalation for Pediatric Patients Admitted for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Flares

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to complete a single hospital quality assessment to characterize the use, safety, and outcomes of the 5 specialty medications (infliximab, adalimumab, tofacitinib, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab) used for the treatment of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease following admission due to a disease flare.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, quality assessment of the current clinical practice. The electronic medical record was queried to identify patients ages 0 to 18 years admitted to our institution during a 2-year period from September 1, 2019, to September 30, 2021, who received infliximab, adalimumab, tofacitinib, ustekinumab, and/or vedolizumab for the treatment of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis followed by manual data collection and cohort analysis.

RESULTS

The total population comprised 20 patients during 23 encounters. The biologic-naive group included 12 patients during 12 encounters, 2 of which are also included in the biologic-experienced group, which captured a total of 10 patients during 11 encounters. In the biologic-naive group, infliximab monotherapy comprised the largest percentage of therapy plans across encounters (91.6%), with a statistically significant greater number of readmissions within 6 months of discharge (p = 0.00031). The biologic-experienced cohort had a statistically significant longer duration of intravenous corticosteroid administration (p = 0.016) and a large variety of therapy plans.

CONCLUSIONS

The diversity of practice observed within our institution supports the need for guidelines to define standard of therapy or guide selection of second-line therapies based on patient-specific factors.

The Future of Advanced Therapies for Pediatric Crohn's Disease

Pediatric Crohn's disease commonly presents with moderate-to-severe intestinal inflammation with a greater risk of complications if remission is not achieved. Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies have offered the possibility of deep and durable remission; however, many children do not respond or no longer respond over time. Further, some children do not require broader systemic immunosuppression to achieve remission and are better served by an alternative treatment strategy. Proper utilization of advanced biologic and small-molecule therapies, which have become available for adult patients since anti-tumor necrosis factor medications, is paramount for tighter disease control for a large proportion of children. Newer advanced therapies such as anti-integrin and anti-interleukin biologics, and several small-molecule agents capitalize on various mechanisms through narrower immunologic targets and reduced immunogenicity. Given limited regulatory approvals of these agents for use in children with Crohn's disease, clinicians continue to rely on data extrapolated from clinical trials in adult patients, sparse pediatric studies, and a growing real-world experience for treatment selection and optimization. In this article, we discuss currently available treatment options, pipeline drugs, and relevant data as they pertain to some of the most pressing clinical challenges faced in treating pediatric Crohn's disease.

Dual biological therapy and small molecules in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) including Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and inflammatory bowel disease unclassified (IBD-U) are chronic inflammatory disorders which can affect the gastrointestinal tract. Anti-tumor necrosis factors antibodies (anti-TNFα) such as infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) are the first line biological therapy for severe or complicated IBDs in pediatric age. Second line therapeutic options as vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) are currently used off-label in pediatric age. Furthermore, despite optimization of biologics, a great proportion of patients may fail to respond to biologic agents (up to 30%) or lose response over the time (around 50%) hence these patients may be left without another valid therapeutic option. Consequently, several efforts have been made in the last years in order to develop new drugs and to contrive new therapeutic strategies. Small molecule drugs (SMDs) and combination therapy with either two biologic agents or with a SMD and a biological agent have recently been proposed. Data on safety and efficacy of these new therapeutic options are limited. The objective of the present review is to summarize the most up-to-date available literature in pediatric IBD.

Dual-Targeted Therapy in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Review

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic systemic immune-mediated disorder. The disease is triggered and perpetuated by a complex interplay between genetic predisposition, dysregulated immune responses, and environmental factors. Pediatric IBD is considered to be more aggressive compared with adult-onset IBD, and commonly requires more intensive pharmacological and surgical treatments. Although the use of targeted therapy, such as biologic therapy and small molecule therapy, is on the rise, there are children with IBD who are refractory to all current therapeutic options. For them, a combination of biologic agents or a biologic agent with small molecules as dual-targeted therapy (DTT) may be a possible therapeutic option. The main indications for DTT are high inflammatory burden and refractoriness to standard therapy, extra-intestinal manifestations of IBD, adverse effects of therapy, and co-existing immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. Several combination therapies were described for pediatric refractory IBD. The main ones were anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab (VDZ), anti-TNF and ustekinumab (UST), VDZ and UST, and biologic agents with tofacitinib. DTT exhibits high efficacy, with high rates of clinical response and remission as well as biomarker remission. The data on endoscopic and radiologic remission are scarce. Most of the adverse effects reported under DTT were mild; however, the serious ones that had been observed mandate a profoundly cautious approach when considering it. Triple immunosuppressive therapy and combinations of biologics with emergent therapies such as selective Janus kinase inhibitors, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, and anti-interleukin-23 agents, are potential future regimens for children with IBD who are refractory to current therapeutic options. This review provides an update of publications on these issues.

Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab for Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The use of ustekinumab in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is off-label and the data are limited. We conducted a systematic review evaluating the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in pediatric IBD.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases for studies of ustekinumab in children and adolescents with IBD investigating clinical remission, clinical response, corticosteroid-free (CS-free) remission, endoscopic remission/response, or safety up to March 17, 2023. A random-effects model was used for calculating summary estimates.

RESULTS

Eleven studies, comprising 370 patients were included. For Crohn's disease (CD), the pooled clinical remission rates were 34% (73/204) at 8-16 weeks and 46% (60/129) at 1 year. The pooled CS-free clinical remission rates were 23% (10/44) at 8-16 weeks and 45% (42/96) at 1 year. For ulcerative colitis (UC)/IBD unspecified (IBD-U), the pooled CS-free clinical remission rates were 24% (6/25) at 26 weeks and 46% (16/35) at 1 year. Endoscopic remission was found in 0-37.5% of CD and 63.6% of UC. Serious adverse events were reported in 3.5% of patients. About one half of patients required reduction in dose intervals and 62.75% patients could continue ustekinumab therapy at 1 year or final visit.

CONCLUSIONS

According to low-quality evidence mainly from cohort studies and case series, approximately one half of patients with CD and UC/IBD-U achieved remission at 1 year. Ustekinumab has a reasonable safety profile and dose optimization is frequently required. Data on the long-term benefit and high-quality evidence are still needed.

Outcomes of Tofacitinib Use in an Irish Pediatric Cohort

Background

Pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC) is typically more extensive and severe at diagnosis compared with adult disease. Tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, has been used since 2018 to induce and maintain remission in UC. There are limited pediatric data regarding its use, either as a monotherapy or in combination with other treatments.

Objectives

To determine the real-world experience and outcomes of tofacitinib therapy in the Irish national cohort with pediatric UC.

Methods

A retrospective study of tofacitinib outcomes was undertaken at Ireland's single national center for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. All patients commenced on tofacitinib since its availability in 2019 were included. Baseline and follow-up clinical characteristics, phenotype, Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI) scores, and treatments before and after tofacitinib commenced were recorded. The primary outcome was remission by 8 weeks, with other clinical outcomes being recorded to maximal available follow-up.

Results

Between November 1, 2019 and June 30, 2022, 15 children (M:F 1:2) were prescribed tofacitinib, 5 as monotherapy. Thirteen had baseline pancolitis at diagnosis and all patients had prior infliximab exposure. The mean time from diagnosis to starting tofacitinib was 381 days (±SD 265). Dual therapy included 5 with infliximab, 4 with vedolizumab, and 1 with adalimumab. The average length of treatment on tofacitinib was 232 days (±SD 170) with 2 patients transitioning to adult services while in remission on tofacitinib therapy. The mean PUCAI score was 48.7 (±SD 14.1) pre-tofacitinib, 16.7 (±SD 15.6) at week 8, and 22.5 (±SD 29.6) by week 16, with a significant reduction in PUCAI by week 16 (P = 0.0004). Eight patients (3 monotherapy) achieved clinical remission, with 4 of the 5 dual therapy patients on infliximab. There were no significant outcome differences between those on mono- or dual therapy. Three patients with combined vedolizumab therapy did not achieve remission, 2 of whom required colectomy by week 24. There were no malignancies, 1 patient developed shingles and another developed herpangina post-tofacitinib. Failure to achieve clinical remission by week 16 was seen in all children who progressed to colectomy (n = 4).

Conclusion

Combining tofacitinib with other biologics is effective in select children with refractory UC. Early responders were more likely to achieve a sustained response at week 16. Failure to achieve remission by week 16 of tofacitinib therapy was strongly associated with progression to colectomy.

Older patients benefit more from sequential courses of washed microbiota transplantation than younger population with ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVES

The short-term efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for ulcerative colitis (UC) has increasingly been evaluated. However, few studies have examined the long-term efficacy and its predictors. This study aimed to assess the clinical factors affecting the long-term efficacy of FMT for patients with UC.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective trial (NCT01790061) for patients with UC undergoing washed microbiota transplantation (WMT), which is the improved methodology of FMT. The long-term clinical efficacy of WMT and the factors affecting efficacy were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 259 patients were included for analysis. Of 70.7% (183/259) of patients achieved a clinical response at 1 month after WMT and 29.7% (77/259) achieved steroid-free clinical remission 6 months after WMT. Total 44 patients maintained a clinical response for ≥24 months, and 33 (17.1%, 33/193) achieved steroid-free clinical remission for ≥24 months with WMT monotherapy. Patients with age at UC onset of ≥60 years, mild disease severity and undergoing ≥2 courses of WMT during the response within 6 months were more likely to achieve steroid-free clinical remission 6 months after WMT. Besides, independent factors associated with the long-term response of WMT for UC were age at onset of ≥60 years and ≥2 courses of WMT during the response.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated WMT could induce short-term steroid-free clinical remission and maintain long-term response in UC, especially for older patients and patients undergoing sequential courses.

Efficacy and Safety of Dual Targeted Therapy for Partially or Non-responsive Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Dual targeted therapy (DTT) has emerged as an attractive therapeutic option for select patients with active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are unable to achieve remission with biologic or small molecule monotherapy. We conducted a systematic review of specific DTT combinations in patients with IBD.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library to identify articles related to the use of DTT for the treatment of Crohn Disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) published before February 2021.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies were identified comprising 288 patients started on DTT for partially or non-responsive IBD. We identified 14 studies with 113 patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and anti-integrin therapies (i.e., vedolizumab and natalizumab), 12 studies with 55 patients receiving vedolizumab and ustekinumab, nine studies with 68 patients receiving vedolizumab and tofacitinib, five studies with 24 patients receiving anti-TNF therapy and tofacitinib, six studies with 18 patients receiving anti-TNF therapy and ustekinumab, and three studies with 13 patients receiving ustekinumab and tofacitinib.

CONCLUSION

DTT is a promising approach to improve IBD treatment for patients with incomplete responses to targeted monotherapy. Larger prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings as is additional predictive modeling to identify the patient subgroups most likely to require and benefit from this approach.

Precision medicine in inflammatory bowel disease: Individualizing the use of biologics and small molecule therapies

The advent of biologics and small molecules in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has marked a significant turning point in the prognosis of IBD, decreasing the rates of corticosteroid dependence, hospitalizations and improving overall quality of life. The introduction of biosimilars has also increased affordability and enhanced access to these otherwise costly targeted therapies. Biologics do not yet represent a complete panacea: A subset of patients do not respond to first-line anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha agents or may subsequently demonstrate a secondary loss of response. Patients who fail to respond to anti-TNF agents typically have a poorer response rate to second-line biologics. It is uncertain which patient would benefit from a different sequencing of biologics or even a combination of biologic agents. The introduction of newer classes of biologics and small molecules may provide alternative therapeutic targets for patients with refractory disease. This review examines the therapeutic ceiling in current treatment strategies of IBD and the potential paradigm shifts in the future.

Precision medicine in inflammatory bowel disease: Individualizing the use of biologics and small molecule therapies

The advent of biologics and small molecules in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has marked a significant turning point in the prognosis of IBD, decreasing the rates of corticosteroid dependence, hospitalizations and improving overall quality of life. The introduction of biosimilars has also increased affordability and enhanced access to these otherwise costly targeted therapies. Biologics do not yet represent a complete panacea: A subset of patients do not respond to first-line anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha agents or may subsequently demonstrate a secondary loss of response. Patients who fail to respond to anti-TNF agents typically have a poorer response rate to second-line biologics. It is uncertain which patient would benefit from a different sequencing of biologics or even a combination of biologic agents. The introduction of newer classes of biologics and small molecules may provide alternative therapeutic targets for patients with refractory disease. This review examines the therapeutic ceiling in current treatment strategies of IBD and the potential paradigm shifts in the future.

Cytokines in Spondyloarthritis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: From Pathogenesis to Therapeutic Implications

Spondyloarthritis and inflammatory bowel diseases are chronic immune disorders of the joints and the gut that often coexist in the same patient, increasing the burden of each disorder, worsening patients' quality of life, and influencing therapeutic strategies. Genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, microbiome features, immune cell trafficking, and soluble factors such as cytokines contribute to the pathogenesis of both articular and intestinal inflammation. Most of the molecular targeted biological therapies developed over the last two decades were based on evidence that specific cytokines may be involved in these immune diseases. Despite pro-inflammatory cytokine pathways sharing the pathogenesis of both articular and gut diseases (i.e., tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-23), several other cytokines (i.e., interleukin-17) may be differently involved in the tissue damage process, depending on the specific disease and the organ involved in inflammation, making difficult the identification of a therapeutic plan that is efficacious for both inflammatory manifestations. In this narrative review, we comprehensively summarize the current knowledge on cytokine involvement in spondyloarthritis and inflammatory bowel diseases, underlining similarities and differences among their pathogenetic pathways; finally, we provide an overview of current and potential future treatment strategies to simultaneously target both articular and gut immune disorders.

Current perspectives on pediatric inflammatory bowel disease focusing on transitional care management. What should we consider?

The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to rise around the globe. Although the percentage of pediatric IBD patients seems to be increasing, rates are surprisingly heterogeneous among different populations. Although the pathogenesis of IBD is believed to be multifactorial, a genetic predisposition may be especially relevant in pediatric-onset IBD. Phenotypic characteristics can also be significantly different when comparing pediatric and adult-onset IBD. Patients that develop the disease at a younger age usually present with more extensive and more aggressive disease and develop complications faster when compared to those that develop it during adulthood. Children with IBD are found to have frequent mood disorders and have a higher risk of developing socio-economic hardship, failing to meet development milestones. Therefore, IBD management should always involve a multidisciplinary team that is not limited to medical providers. Most institutions do not have an established transition protocol and lack the resources and training for transition care. Although there is no consensus on an optimal timing to transition the patient's care to an adult team, it is usually accepted they should be eligible for adult care when most of the key transition points have been met. Management strategies should be tailored to each patient's developmental level and environment. A successful transition can improve the long-term outcomes such as sustained remission, medication adherence, mental health and social and academic performance, while decreasing healthcare utilization. Every institution that manages pediatric IBD patients should have a well-established transition protocol in order to make sure to maintain continuity of care.

Breaking through the therapeutic ceiling of inflammatory bowel disease: Dual-targeted therapies

Emerging biologics and small-molecule drugs have changed the clinical status quo of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, current treatments remain at a standstill in terms of response and remission in many cases. Accumulating evidence indicates that dual-targeted therapy (DTT) could be promising in overcoming the existing ceiling of IBD treatment. However, data on the efficacy and safety of DTT on Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are still limited or insufficient. Moreover, there is a lack of studies delineating the mechanisms of DTT. Given that various targeted drugs have different targets among the extensive redundant inflammatory networks, DTT could result in various outcomes. In this review, we have summarized the current data on the safety, effectiveness, and clinical development status of novel targeted drugs related to refractory IBD, and have explored the mechanism of action of therapy. We have categorized therapeutic agents into "Therapeutic Agents Targeting Cellular Signaling Pathways" and "Therapeutic Agents Targeting Leukocyte Trafficking" based on the different therapeutic targets, and also by classifying therapeutic agents targeting the cellular signaling pathways into "JAK-dependent" and "JAK-independent," and placed the existing drug combinations into 3 categories based on their mechanisms, namely, overlapping, synergistic, and complementary effects. Lastly, we have proposed the possible mechanisms of DTT to conceive a theoretical framework for clinical decision-making and further drug development and research from an IBD standpoint.

Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Optimal Strategies for Drug Therapy

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-threatening medical emergency with considerable morbidity (30% to 40%). Patients with ASUC require hospitalization for prompt medical treatment, and colectomy is considered if medical therapy fails. Corticosteroids remain the primary initial therapy, although one-third of patients do not respond to treatment. Clinical data have indicated that cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and infliximab can be used to treat patients with ASUC who do not respond to intravenous corticosteroids. The effectiveness and safety of sequential therapy have recently been reported; however, the data are not convincing. Importantly, timely decision-making with rescue therapy or surgical treatment is critical to manage ASUC without compromising the health or safety of the patients. In addition, risk stratification and the use of predictive clinical parameters have improved the clinical outcome.of ASUC. Multidisciplinary teams that include inflammatory bowel disease experts, colorectal surgeons, and other medical staff contribute to the better management of patients with ASUC. In this review, we introduce current evidence and present a clinical approach to manage ASUC.

Current status of novel biologics and small molecule drugs in the individualized treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Treatment strategies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are rapidly evolving with the development of biologics and small molecule drugs (SMDs). However, these drugs are not guaranteed to be effective in all patients, and a “ceiling effect” of biologic monotherapy may occur. This issue highlights an unmet need for optimizing the use of biologics and predicting therapeutic responses. Thus, the development of new drugs with novel mechanisms of action is urgently needed for patients with primary nonresponse and secondary loss of response to conventional biologics and SMDs. In addition, combining different biologics or SMDs has been proposed as a novel strategy to enhance treatment efficacy in IBD, which theoretically has multidimensional anti-inflammatory potential. Based on the current evidence available for IBD, dual targeted therapy may be a promising strategy for refractory IBD patients who have failed in multiple biologic trea-tments or who have extraintestinal manifestation. Additionally, identifying the subgroup of IBD patients who are responding to biological combination therapies is also equally important in stable disease remission. In this review, we sum-marize the newly developed biologics and SMDs and the current status of bio-logics/SMDs to highlight the development of individualized treatment in IBD.

Role of the combination of biologics and/or small molecules in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of chronic diseases that includes ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, and indeterminate colitis. Patients with IBD require prolonged treatment and high utilization of healthcare resources for proper management. The treatment of patients with IBD is focused on achieving therapeutic goals including clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic variables that result in improvement of the quality of life and prevention of disability. Advanced IBD treatment includes tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, integrin antagonist, antagonist of the p40 subunit of interleukin 12/23, and small molecule drugs. However, despite the multiple treatments available, about 40% of patients are refractory to therapy and present with persistent symptoms that have a great impact on their quality of life, with hospitalization and surgery being necessary in many cases. Dual therapy, a strategy sometimes applicable to refractory IBD patients, includes the combination of two biologics or a biologic in combination with a small molecule drug. There are two distinct scenarios in IBD patients in which this approach can be used: (1) Refractory active luminal disease without extraintestinal manifestations; and (2) patients with IBD in remission, but with active extraintestinal manifestations or immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. This review provides a summary of the results (clinical response and remission) of different combinations of advanced drugs in patients with IBD, both in adults and in the pediatric population. In addition, the safety profile of different combinations of dual therapy is analyzed. The use of newer combinations, including recently approved treatments, the application of new biomarkers and artificial intelligence, and clinical trials to establish effectiveness during long-term follow-up, are needed to establish new strategies for the use of advanced treatments in patients with refractory IBD.

Dual Biologic Therapy in Moderate to Severe Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel diseases in children are characterized by a wide variety of symptoms and often a severe clinical course. In the treatment, we aimed to induce and maintain remission. We focused on assessing the efficacy and safety of the concomitant use of two biologic therapies including: anti-TNF (infliximab, adalimumab) vedolizumab and ustekinumab in a refractory pediatric IBD cohort.

METHODS

Fourteen children (nine ulcerative colitis, one ulcerative colitis/IBD-unspecified, four Crohn's disease) with a disease duration of 5.2 (8 months-14 years) years, initiated dual therapy at an age of 11.7 (3-17) years after failure of monotherapy with a biological drug. Five patients (36%) were treated with vedolizumab/adalimumab (VDZ + ADA), five (36%) with ustekinumab/adalimumab (UST + ADA), and three (21%) with infliximab/vedolizumab (IFX + VDZ). One patient (7%) was switched from a combination of vedolizumab and adalimumab to ustekinumab and adalimumab during follow-up.

RESULTS

A clinical improvement was obtained in ten children (73%; 5 UC, 1 UC/IBD-unspecified, 4 CD) on the PCDAI/PUCAI scale after 4 months of a second biological drug being added. The median fecal calprotectin decreased from 1610 µg/g (140-10,100) to 586 µg/g (5-3410; p = 0.028) between baseline and 4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our clinical experience suggests that dual therapy may be an option for pediatric patients with moderate and severe courses of IBD with limited therapeutic options.

Case report: JAKi and TNFi dual therapy is a potential treatment strategy for difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a heterogeneous chronic disease. RA patients should start disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) therapy immediately after diagnosis. If first-line treatment with conventional synthetic DMARDs does not relieve the disease, biology and targeted synthetic DMARDs are options for patients. Patients can switch to different types of biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs if remission is not achieved. However, for patients with difficult-to-treat RA, achieving disease stabilization after the failure of multiple biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs is a clinical challenge that needs to be addressed. As distinct cytokine pathways, the benefits and challenges of dual therapy are worth discussing. As the most extensively used biologic DMARDs, adalimumab is an anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody used to treat RA. Tofacitinib, as a Janus Kinase inhibitor, is an orally administered targeted synthetic DMARDs that involved in the regulation of immune responses by directly or indirectly inhibiting cytokine pathways. This report describes a successful case of a 48-year-old woman with difficult-to-treat RA who treated with Tofacitinib combined with adalimumab. She had been on glucocorticosteroid for a long time, but had persistent joint pain and fatigue. At more than one year of follow-up, her Disease Activity Score for 28-joint counts based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) remained in complete remission, and she discontinued her glucocorticosteroid medications. Also, she did not develop a mycobacterial tuberculosis infection, herpes zoster, and new-onset cardiovascular events.

Tofacitinib Salvage Therapy for Children Hospitalized for Corticosteroid- and Biologic-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis

OBJECTIVES

Colectomy rates following acute severe ulcerative colitis have plateaued around 20% despite intravenous corticosteroid and intensified anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologic dosing. Recent studies have shown tofacitinib to provide additional benefit in further decreasing colectomy rates among hospitalized adult patients with corticosteroid- and anti-TNF-nonresponsive ulcerative colitis. Pediatric data describing the effectiveness of tofacitinib for this indication does not yet exist. We aimed to describe the treatment courses and colectomy-free survival among pediatric patients treated with tofacitinib while hospitalized for refractory ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of consecutive hospitalized pediatric patients initiating tofacitinib for refractory ulcerative colitis from 2018 to 2021. The primary outcome was 90-day colectomy-free survival. Secondary outcomes included colectomy-free clinical remission, corticosteroid independence, colectomy-free tofacitinib drug-persistence, tofacitinib-related adverse events, and postoperative complications. Baseline characteristics and details of the timing and positioning of therapies utilized during hospitalization were described. Outcomes were described using counts, percentages, and Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Eleven patients met inclusion criteria. All patients demonstrated nonresponse to both intravenous corticosteroids and anti-TNF therapy prior to tofacitinib initiation. Median hospitalization length was 22 days and mean maximum pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index during hospitalization was 68. Eight of 11 patients remained colectomy-free at 90 days following hospital admission and 6 remained colectomy-free over median 182-day follow-up, including 4 of whom remained on tofacitinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Tofacitinib may represent a new treatment option for hospitalized pediatric patients with corticosteroid- and anti-TNF-nonresponsive ulcerative colitis. Future research is essential in determining the optimal positioning of these therapies.

Combining biological therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a Finnish multi-centre study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Therapy with two concomitant biologicals targeting different inflammatory pathways has emerged as a new therapy option for treatment refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data on the efficacy and safety of dual biological therapy (DBT) are scarce and are investigated in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on all patients treated with a combination of two biologicals in four Finnish tertiary centres were collected and analysed. Remission was assessed by a physician on the basis of biomarkers, endoscopic evaluation and alleviation of symptoms.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients with 22 trials of DBT were included. Fifteen patients had Crohn's disease. The most common combination of DBT was adalimumab (ADA) and ustekinumab (USTE; 36%) with median follow-up of nine months (range 2-31). Altogether seven (32%) patients were in remission at the end of follow-up and in two trials response to DBT was assessed to be partial with the relief of patient symptoms. In a total of four trials DBT reduced the need for corticosteroids. The majority of patients achieving a response to DBT were treated with the combination of ADA and USTE (56%). At the end of follow-up all nine (41%) patients responding to DBT continued treatment. Infection complications occurred in three patients (19%).

CONCLUSION

DBT is a promising alternative treatment for refractory IBD, and half of our patients benefitted from it. More data on the efficacy and safety of DBT are needed especially in long-term follow up.

Tofacitinib to Treat Severe Acute Refractory Colitis in a Teenager: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Acute severe colitis (ASC) may occur within 3 months of ulcerative colitis diagnosis in 9%-15% of children and the rate of colectomy is up to 40%-50% within 5 years after an ASC. The aim of this publication is to present recent and relevant data on the success of medical treatment with tofacitinib in ASC.

Methods

We report a challenging case of a teenage boy with ASC at diagnosis and conduct a discussion after a review of the literature regarding the use of tofacitinib in inflammatory bowel disease, especially in pediatric patients and in ASC.

Results

The patient was hospitalized for 10 weeks and was refractory to conventional therapies: intravenous corticosteroids, infliximab, methotrexate, and vedolizumab. He received 7 blood transfusions and also presented with a severe malnutrition requiring a total parenteral nutrition. Tofacitinib was considered as a medical last resort before colectomy and was started at week 8. Thirteen days after starting tofacitinib, he was asymptomatic and was discharged on tofacitinib as sole treatment. By week 9 of tofacitinib, a colonoscopy showed both endoscopic and histological remission. He has remained in clinical remission at 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions

Tofacitinib may be an alternative medical treatment to avoid colectomy in ASC. It is a small molecule with a rapid onset and few severe adverse events. It has been used for ASC in adult patients, allowing to avoid colectomy in more than 60%. To our knowledge, this is one of the few pediatric patients with refractory ASC at initial diagnosis who responded to tofacitinib.

Positioning of tofacitinib in treatment of ulcerative colitis: a global perspective

INTRODUCTION

Tofacitinib has emerged as a useful drug for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC).

AREAS COVERED

There is an unmet need for cost-effective, non-immunogenic drugs with a safe adverse effect profile to treat patients with ulcerative colitis. In the present review, we evaluate the available literature to inform the appropriate positioning of tofacitinib in the current drug landscape and identify subsets where its use should be done with caution.

EXPERT OPINION

Tofacitinib is helpful in the treatment of patients where the standard conventional or biological therapies have failed or were not tolerated. With lower costs of the generic drug than the biologicals (or biosimilars), it could be an important therapy in low- to middle-income countries. The risk of infections, especially Herpes Zoster and tuberculosis, needs to be addressed before initiation. Tofacitinib should be avoided in patients with venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Due to limited evidence, the use is not recommended in pregnancy, while it should be used with caution in elderly citizens. Future trials should look into the head-to-head comparison of tofacitinib with biologicals. The role of tofacitinib in acute severe colitis needs evaluation with comparative trials with current standards of care.

Dual Biologic Therapy in a Patient With Niemann-Pick Type C and Crohn Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review

Dual biologic therapy has become a new area of interest in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Monogenic/polygenic IBD and the role of genetics in IBD is an evolving field, with many of these patients having difficult treatment courses. We present a case of a teenage patient with Niemann-Pick disease type C and Crohn colitis, who sustained clinical remission only after escalating to dual biologic therapy (anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha [infliximab] and anti-interleukin-12/anti-interleukin-23 [ustekinumab]). A literature review of dual biologic therapy in pediatric IBD revealed 8 case series and 1 cohort study. In pediatric patients with genetic disorders and IBD who are not responding adequately to biologic therapy, adding a second biologic medication with a different mechanism of action may be efficacious. Targeting both anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (which induces pro-inflammatory cytokines) and the pro-inflammatory cytokines themselves (interleukin-12/interleukin-23) may be important in impaired macrophage function and increased cytokine response. Our case adds to the sparse literature on the utility of combining ustekinumab and infliximab in pediatric IBD and is the first to describe its use for treating ongoing active luminal disease.

Ustekinumab in Crohn's Disease: New Data for Positioning in Treatment Algorithm

The treatment of patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease [CD] is still challenging. Therapeutic options include steroids, immunosuppressants, anti-TNFα agents, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab. Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody blocking the p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23. It showed to be effective and safe in randomised clinical trials and real-life studies and is currently approved for the management of CD patients who are naive to biologics and those who have already been treated with such medications. However, to date, a detailed and approved therapeutic algorithm is not available. The aim of this review is to report the most recent and updated data on the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe CD and to define the optimal management of these patients.

[Recent research on tofacitinib in the treatment of pediatric rheumatic diseases]

Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor and can block the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription signal transduction pathway and reduce the production and release of a variety of cytokines. It has great potential in the treatment of various rheumatic diseases with a rapid onset of action and can reduce corticosteroid dependence and related adverse events. The therapeutic effect of tofacitinib in adult patients has been confirmed, and it has been increasingly used in pediatric patients in recent years. This article reviews the clinical application of tofacitinib in the treatment of pediatric autoimmune diseases.

Efficacy and safety of vedolizumab for pediatrics with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab use in pediatrics is still off-label and the data are limited. We conducted a systematic review evaluating the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for studies of vedolizumab in children and adolescents with IBD reporting clinical remission, response, corticosteroid-free (CS-free) remission, mucosal healing, or safety up to December 3rd 2021.

RESULTS

Ten studies, comprising 455 patients were included. For CD, the pooled clinical remission rates were 25% (19/75) at 6 weeks, 28% (25/85) at 14 weeks, 32% (17/53) at 22 weeks, and 46% (43/92) at 1 year. For UC/IBD-U, the pooled clinical remission rates were 36% (25/70) at 6 weeks, 48% (52/101) at 14 weeks, 53% (24/45) at 22 weeks, and 45% (50/112) at 1 year. Mucosal healing was found in 17%-39% of CD and 15%-34% of UC/IBD-U respectively. Six percent of patients reported serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

According to low-quality evidence based on case series, approximately one-third and one-half of patients for CD and UC/IBD-U respectively achieved remission within 22 weeks, and about half of patients achieved remission at 1 year with reasonable safety profile. Long-term benefit profile data and high quality evidence are still needed.

Dual Biologic Therapy for the Treatment of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review of the Literature

Background: pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) who qualify for biological therapy represent a group of severely ill patients. They have never been successful with conventional medication. Biologic medications in monotherapy are frequently used in the disease course, however they result in a 1-year remission, which can be maintained in approximately 40% of IBD patients. Method: the present study aims to summarize the review of literature data on the use of therapy with a combination of two biological and small molecule drugs, anti-TNF (infliximab, adalimumab), vedolizumab and ustekinumab, as well as Janus kinase inhibitors (tofacitinib). The risks associated with the use of dual biological therapy and potential adverse effects are particularly important. The literature data was reviewed using the following terms: “use of combination biologic in paediatric IBD”, “combination biologics”, and “dual biologic for treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease”. Conclusion: the use of dual biological therapy is a new therapeutic option. In pediatric IBD, combining the different mechanisms of action of the two biological drugs seems to be safe and effective. Anti-TNF drugs with vedolizumab or ustekinumab may be a particularly beneficial combination. Nevertheless, the clarification and justification of potential advantages of combined biological therapies in further studies, such as randomized control trials, are needed.

TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab for the treatment of psoriasis: therapeutic utility in the era of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory condition for which eleven FDA-approved biologic therapies are approved. Over the past decade, studies have documented the higher efficacy of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors for the treatment of psoriasis compared to the TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab, an IL-12/23 inhibitor. Despite this, there remains an important role for the use of TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab in the treatment of psoriasis. Here, we review how considerations of infection and malignancy risk, patient demographics, treatment resistance, and co-morbidities may make certain TNF-alpha inhibitors or ustekinumab an excellent choice for therapy in particular patient subgroups.

Selecting the Best Combined Biological Therapy for Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

Current medical treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) does not achieve 100% response rates, and a subset of refractory and severely ill patients have persistent active disease after being treated with all possible drug alternatives. The combination of two biological therapies (CoT) seems a reasonable alternative, and has been increasingly tested in very difficult cases. The present review suggests that CoT seems to be safe and effective for refractory and severely ill IBD patients. Ustekinumab plus vedolizumab and vedolizumab plus anti-TNF were the most used CoTs for Crohn's disease. For ulcerative colitis, the most used CoTs were vedolizumab plus anti-TNF and vedolizumab plus tofacitinib. The aforesaid CoTs have shown good efficacy and few adverse events have been reported.

Systematic Review With Meta-analysis: Safety and Effectiveness of Combining Biologics and Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background

Combining biologics and small molecules could potentially overcome the plateau of drug efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and effectiveness of dual biologic therapy (DBT), or small molecule combined with a biologic therapy (SBT) in IBD patients.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Clinical trials.gov until November 3, 2020, including studies with 2 or more IBD patients on DBT or SBT. Main outcome was safety assessed as pooled rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) for each combination. Effectiveness was reported as pooled rates of clinical, endoscopic, and/or radiographic response and remission. The certainty of evidence was rated according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

Results

Of the 3688 publications identified, 13 studies (1 clinical trial, 12 observational studies) involving 266 patients on 7 different combinations were included. Median number of prior biologics ranged from 0 to 4, and median duration of follow-up was 16-68 weeks. Most common DBT and SBT were vedolizumab (VDZ) with anti-tumor necrosis factor (aTNF, n = 56) or tofacitinib (Tofa, n = 57), respectively. Pooled rates of SAE for these were 9.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-21.4) for VDZ-aTNF and 1.0% (95% CI, 0.0-7.6) for Tofa-VDZ. The overall certainty of evidence was very low due to the observational nature of the studies, and very serious imprecision and inconsistency.

Conclusions

DBT or SBT appears to be generally safe and may be effective in IBD patients, but the evidence is very uncertain.

New Insights and Advances in Pathogenesis and Treatment of Very Early Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Very early onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEO-IBD) is characterized by multifactorial chronic recurrent intestinal inflammation. Compared with elderly patients, those with VEO-IBD have a more serious condition, not responsive to conventional treatments, with a poor prognosis. Recent studies found that genetic and immunologic abnormalities are closely related to VEO-IBD. Intestinal immune homeostasis monogenic defects (IIHMDs) are changed through various mechanisms. Recent studies have also revealed that abnormalities in genes and immune molecular mechanisms are closely related to VEO-IBD. IIHMDs change through various mechanisms. Epigenetic factors can mediate the interaction between the environment and genome, and genetic factors and immune molecules may be involved in the pathogenesis of the environment and gut microbiota. These discoveries will provide new directions and ideas for the treatment of VEO-IBD.

Tofacitinib for a Child with Refractory Steroid-Dependent Ulcerative Colitis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Patient: Female, 12-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Ulcerative

Symptoms: Bloody diarrhea

Medication:—

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Gastroenterology and Hepatology