Health Care Costs and Resource Utilization Among Patients With Crohn's Disease With and Without Perianal Fistula

Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Treatment in Fistulising Crohn's Disease: An International Real-Life Retrospective Multicentre Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Perianal fistulas of Crohn's disease (CD) create a significant burden on patients' lives. However, the efficacy and safety of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell treatment are contradicting, and real-world evidence is lacking.

AIMS

To examine the usability of darvadstrocel therapy in managing perianal CD.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with CD and perianal fistulas in this retrospective multicenter study. The primary outcome was perianal clinical remission (defined as all treated fistulas closed) at weeks 26 and 52. Secondary outcomes were clinical response rates (≥ 1 fistulas closed), perianal activity (PDAI), patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Data were recorded at baseline and weeks 12, 26 and 52. Prediction of primary outcomes was performed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Overall, among 223 patients (male/female ratio: 0.48), perianal clinical remission was achieved in 78.2% and 62.3% until weeks 26 and 52. Baseline PDAI score (OR 0.75), number of fistulas (OR 0.28) and the number of weeks after preparation for surgery (OR 0.98) were associated with treatment failure. The clinical response rates were 84.8% and 79.8% at weeks 26 and 52. Improvement of subjective perianal symptoms was achieved in 77.8% and 78.4% of patients, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 13.5% of patients; perianal abscesses and proctalgia were the most frequently reported.

CONCLUSION

Effectiveness data were higher than in clinical trials. The safety profile was reassuring, and patients' satisfaction was high. Appropriate patient selection, fistula preparation and expertise may help to achieve treatment success.

Evaluating the Change in 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Perianal Fistulas on PET/CT over Time: A Serial Retrospective Analysis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Perianal fistulas on18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) can be an incidental site of FDG uptake in patients undergoing PET for other indications. There are no longitudinal studies describing FDG uptake patterns in perianal fistulas. Therefore, we aimed to analyze changes in FDG uptake over time in patients with incidental perianal fistulas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent at least two FDG-PET/CTs between January 2011 and May 2023, with incidental perianal fistula, were retrospectively identified. We analyzed all sequential PET/CTs to determine the presence of a perianal fistula and recorded the fistula's maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Statistical analysis compared fistula FDG-avidity in the initial versus final PET/CT examinations and assessed the correlation between initial fistula SUVmax and percent change over time.

RESULTS

The study included 15 fistulas in 14 patients, with an average of 5 PET/CT examinations per patient. The average interval between the first and last PET/CT was 24 months (range: 6-64). The average initial fistula SUVmax (11.28 ± 3.81) was significantly higher than the final fistula SUVmax (7.22 ± 3.99) (p = 0.0067). The fistula SUVmax declined by an average of 32.01 ± 35.33% with no significant correlation between initial fistula SUVmax and percent change over time (r = -0.213, p = 0.443, 95% CI -0.66-0.35).

CONCLUSION

FDG uptake in perianal fistulas shows temporal fluctuations but follows a decreasing SUVmax trend, possibly indicating a relationship with inflammatory activity. Further studies with larger cohorts paired with perianal fistula pelvic MR imaging are needed to validate these observations and their utility in guiding further management.

Fistulizing Perianal Disease as a First Manifestation of Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Incidences of perianal fistulas (PAFs) as a first manifestation of Crohn's disease (CD) vary widely in the literature. Aim: To analyse the percentage of patients with a PAF preceding CD diagnosis and assess the time to diagnosis. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted. Studies reporting on patients with a PAF preceding CD diagnosis were identified. Primary outcomes were the (weighted) percentage of patients with CD with a PAF preceding CD and their time to CD diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were the (weighted) percentage of patients with CD with a PAF preceding CD diagnosis in predefined patient subgroups, including (1) sex (men vs. women), (2) ethnicity (Asian vs. non-Asian), and (3) age (paediatric (0-18 y) and patients with elderly onset CD (>60 y) vs. adult patients (18-60 y)). Results: Seventeen studies were included (34,030 patients with CD). In the overall CD population, a PAF preceded CD in 8.6% [95%CI; 5.72; 12.71] with a weighted mean time to CD diagnosis of 45.9 (31.3) months. No studies reported details on sex differences in patients with a PAF as a manifesting sign of CD. In Asian populations, a PAF preceded CD in 17.66% [95%CI; 11.45; 26.25], which was significantly higher when compared with non-Asians (4.99% [95%CI; 3.75; 6.60], OR:3.99, p < 0.0001). In adolescents, an incidence of 9.17% [95%CI; 5.92; 13.93] was found with significantly lower incidences in paediatric patients (6.38% [95%CI; 1.84; 19.85], OR:0.53, p < 0.0001), and elderly-onset patients (3.77% [95%CI; 1.68; 8.25], OR:0.44, p = 0.0035). Conclusions: This systematic review shows that in the literature, almost 10% of patients present with a PAF as a first manifestation of CD, with a mean time to diagnosis of almost four years. These results emphasise that increased clinical awareness is needed.

Challenges in IBD Research 2024: Pragmatic Clinical Research

Pragmatic clinical research is 1 of the 5 focus areas of the Challenges in IBD Research 2024, a multidisciplinary effort by scientists, clinicians, patients, and funders to identify priorities for patient-centric research. This summary provides a comprehensive overview of current gaps in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinical research and actionable approaches to address them. This review is focused on identifying research that is needed to achieve the best outcomes for patients in clinical practice. Research gaps include understanding the needs of understudied patient groups and addressing barriers to care so all patients receive optimal care, validating and using biomarkers to enable early diagnosis and result in better outcomes for adults and children with IBD, and determining the optimal sequencing of treatments (medical, surgical, adjunct) in children and adults. Inclusive pragmatic research is needed to address these gaps and lead to improvements in patient care and outcomes for all populations of patients with IBD.

Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Their Experiences With Crohn's Perianal Fistulas

Background

Little is known about patients' perception of care and management of Crohn's perianal fistulas (CPF). This study was conducted to understand US patient and caregiver attitudes and challenges to CPF care.

Methods

Patients with CPF and caregivers of patients with CPF completed a 36-question survey about their perceptions and challenges regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and overall management of CPF. Patients/caregivers were recruited via online Crohn's and fistula support group websites and forums and via their gastroenterologists (GEs) and surgeons from October 2020 through January 2021.

Results

The survey was completed by 96 patients and 54 caregivers. Respondents reported over 60% and 14%-23% of CPF were diagnosed and treated by a GE or surgeon, respectively. Nearly all patients/caregivers wanted to be involved in treatment decision-making with their physicians (81%). While the majority of patients/caregivers were satisfied with their quality of care (65%) and access to care (67%), racial disparities exist and there is room for improvement. A smaller proportion of non-White versus White patients/caregivers reported satisfaction with care quality (39% vs 72%, respectively) and access to care (57% vs 69%, respectively). Half of non-White patient/caregivers (50%) versus 69% of White patient/caregivers knew where to access CPF information. Most patients/caregivers (69%) stated that they would benefit from more information on managing day-to-day CPF symptoms. Significant barriers perceived by patients/caregivers to receiving optimal CPF care included lack of effective treatments (69%) and lack of access to specialist care (68%).

Conclusions

Improvements in multidisciplinary CPF care are required to optimize treatment.

Understanding the role of the primary care physician in the management of patients with Crohn's perianal fistulas

OBJECTIVES

To understand the role of primary care physicians (PCPs) in the recognition, diagnosis, and management of Crohn's perianal fistulas (CPF) and their referral patterns and treatment expectations.

METHODS

This survey-based study was conducted between September 2020 and October 2020. US-based PCPs managing at least one patient with Crohn's disease per week were included. Participants were presented with two case vignettes relevant to primary care practice; Case Vignette 1 comprised three parts and focused on initial CPF presentation and progression to partial response; Case Vignette 2 focused on recurrent CPF. Survey questions elicited the physician's clinical approach to each case. Data were presented as descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Overall, 151 PCPs (median 23 years in practice) who saw about three patients per month with new/existing CPF responded. For Case Vignette 1, upon identification of a fistulous tract, 89% of respondents would refer the patient, mostly to a colorectal surgeon or gastroenterologist. Most PCPs (69%) would begin the patient on medication; 46% would conduct a diagnostic/imaging study. Treatment expectations after referral varied: 55% of respondents believed surgeons would place a seton or use one prior to surgery; 23% expected medical management only; 23% were unsure. Case Vignette 2 revealed that 98% of PCPs preferred to be involved in patient care after referral; however, only 49% were. Of these, 76% considered reinforcing patient treatment adherence as their primary role. While 80% of PCPs were at least moderately satisfied with communication and care coordination with multidisciplinary teams, 52% considered lack of access to specialists as at least a moderate barrier to multidisciplinary team management.

CONCLUSION

PCPs want more involvement in multidisciplinary management of patients with CPF. Continuing education providing PCPs with up-to-date information on diagnostic modalities, treatment options, early diagnosis, the role of PCPs within a multidisciplinary team, and effective initial CPF care is required.

Perianal Fistulas Are Associated with Persistently Higher Direct Health Care Costs in Crohn's Disease: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

The economic impact of perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease (CD) has not been formally assessed in population-based studies in the biologic era.

AIM

To compare direct health care costs in persons with and without perianal fistulas.

METHODS

We performed a longitudinal population-based study using administrative data from Ontario, Canada. Adults (> 17 years) with CD were identified between 2007 and 2013 using validated algorithms. Perianal fistula positive "cases" were matched to up to 4 "controls" with CD without perianal fistulas based on age, sex, geographic region, year of CD diagnosis and duration of follow-up. Direct health care costs, excluding drug costs from private payers, were estimated annually beginning 5 years before (lookback) and up to 9 years after perianal fistula diagnosis (study completion) for cases and a standardized date for matched controls.

RESULTS

A total of 581 cases were matched to 1902 controls. The annual per capita direct cost for cases was similar at lookback compared to controls ($2458 ± 6770 vs $2502 ± 10,752; p = 0.952), maximally greater in the first year after perianal fistulas diagnosis ($16,032 ± 21,101 vs $6646 ± 13,021; p < 0.001) and remained greater at study completion ($11,358 ± 17,151 vs $5178 ± 9792; p < 0.001). At perianal fistula diagnosis, the cost difference was driven primarily by home care cost (tenfold greater), publicly-covered prescription drugs (threefold greater) and hospitalizations (twofold greater), whereas at study completion, prescription drugs were the dominant driver (threefold greater).

CONCLUSION

In our population-based cohort, perianal fistulas were associated with significantly higher direct healthcare costs at the time of perianal fistulas diagnosis and sustained long-term.

Multi-national observational study to assess quality of life and treatment preferences in patients with Crohn's perianal fistulas

BACKGROUND

Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) are at risk of developing complications such as perianal fistulas. Patients with Crohn's perianal fistulas (CPF) are affected by fecal incontinence (FI), bleeding, pain, swelling, and purulent perianal discharge, and generally face a higher treatment burden than patients with CD without CPF.

AIM

To gain insights into the burden of illness/quality of life in patients with CPF and their treatment preferences and satisfaction.

METHODS

This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in patients with CD aged 21-90 years via a web-enabled questionnaire in seven countries (April-August 2021). Patients were recruited into three cohorts: Cohort 1 included patients without perianal fistulas; cohort 2 included patients with perianal fistulas without fistula-related surgery; and cohort 3 included patients with perianal fistulas and fistula-related surgery. Validated patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess quality of life. Drivers of treatment preferences were measured using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).

RESULTS

In total, 929 patients were recruited (cohort 1, n = 620; cohort 2, n = 174; cohort 3, n = 135). Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire scores were worse for patients with CPF (cohorts 2 and 3) than for those with CD without CPF (cohort 1): Mean score 3.8 and 3.7 vs 4.1, respectively, (P < 0.001). Similarly, mean Revised FI and FI Quality of Life scores were worse for patients with CPF than for those with CD without CPF. Quality of Life with Anal Fistula scores were similar in patients with CPF with or without CPF-related surgery (cohorts 2 and 3): Mean score 41 and 42, respectively. In the DCE, postoperative discomfort and fistula healing rate were the most important treatment attributes influencing treatment choice: Mean relative importance 35.7 and 24.7, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The burden of illness in CD is significantly higher for patients with CPF and patients rate lower postoperative discomfort and higher healing rates as the most desirable treatment attributes.

Allogenic stem cells for Crohn's anal fistulas: Treating early improves the deep remission rate

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life clinical and radiological efficacy of darvadstrocel injection into complex perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease. Secondary endpoints were to assess symptomatic efficacy, adverse effects and factors associated with complete combined clinical-radiological response (deep remission).

METHODS

After marketing the product in France, all first patients treated consecutively were included. A complete clinical response was defined by a complete closure of all external openings with no discharge on pressure. A complete radiological response (MRI), evaluated at least after six months of follow-up, was defined by a completely fibrotic sequela without abscess. A deep remission was defined as the association of a complete clinical response with a complete radiological response.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients were included (M/F: 22/21, median age 37 [26-45] years). The fistulas were already drained with seton(s) and were on biologic treatment. After a median follow-up of 383 (359-505) days, 28 (65%) patients showed a clinical response (22 complete and 6 partial) and 16 (37%) achieved a deep remission. The Perineal Disease Activity Index decreased significantly after treatment: 39 (91%) patients reported symptomatic improvement in terms of discharge, pain, and induration, and 28 (65%) no longer had any perineal symptoms. No severe adverse events were reported. A short history of Crohn's disease <3 years was significantly associated with deep remission (OD 4.5 [1.0-19.1], p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Darvadstrocel injection resulted in a clinical response for two thirds of patients and deep remission for one third. A shorter duration of Crohn's disease was associated with deep remission.

Abdominal Pain in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Evidence-Based, Multidisciplinary Review

Abdominal pain is one of the most common and impactful symptoms associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. A great deal of research has been undertaken over the past several years to improve our understanding and to optimize management of this issue. Unfortunately, there is still significant confusion about the underlying pathophysiology of abdominal pain in these conditions and the evidence underlying treatment options in this context. There is also a relative paucity of comprehensive reviews on this topic, including those that simultaneously evaluate pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapeutic options. In this review, our multidisciplinary team examines evidence for various currently available medical, surgical, and other analgesic options to manage abdominal pain in IBD.

Malignancy rates in Crohn's disease patients with perianal fistula: A German retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are at increased risk of colorectal and extra-intestinal cancer. However, the overall cancer risk in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) with perianal fistulas (PF) (CPF) and those with CD without PF (non-PF CD) is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence and incidence of cancer in patients with CPF and non-PF CD, and to estimate incidence rate ratio (IRR) of cancer between CPF and non-PF CD groups.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the German InGef (Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin) research database. Patients with a CD record and PF from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2014 were identified and followed up from 1 January 2015 until the first occurrence of cancer, end of health insurance contributing data, death, or end of study period (31 December 2020). Prevalence of any type of cancer including patients with CD diagnosed with cancer in the selection period and incidence of cancer excluding patients with CD diagnosed with cancer in the selection period were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 10,208 patients with CD were identified. Of 824 patients with CPF (8.1%), 67 had had a malignancy (6-year period crude malignancy prevalence 8.13% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.36%-10.21%]), which was lower than patients with non-PF CD (19.8% [95% CI 19%-20.6%]). Incidence (per 100,000 person-years) in patients with CPF was 1184 (95% CI 879-1561) and in non-PF CD was 2365 (95% CI 2219-2519). There was no significant difference in the adjusted IRR of cancer for the CPF group compared with the non-PF CD group (0.83 [95% CI 0.62-1.10]; p = 0.219).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in the incidence of any cancer in patients with CPF compared with non-PF CD. However, patients with CPF had a higher numerical risk of cancer than the general German population.

Economic burden related to fistulas or strictures among commercially insured patients with Crohn's disease in the United States

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, progressive, immune-mediated gastrointestinal condition that can lead to fistulizing or stricturing complications. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the burden of illness related to fistulas and/or strictures in patients with CD. METHODS: Using the Optum Research Database from October 2015 to December 2019, patients with CD were classified according to 1 of 3 condition cohorts: CD with fistula (CD-F), CD with stricture (CD-S), or CD with fistula and stricture (CD-FS). Each cohort was matched to a nonfistula, nonstricture CD cohort. Postdiagnosis per patient per year (PPPY) costs and health care resource utilization were assessed, accounting for variable lengths of follow-up periods. Multivariable generalized linear models were used to estimate the adjusted mean costs in each cohort. RESULTS: The CD-F, CD-S, and CD-FS cohorts included 1,317; 4,650; and 894 patients, respectively. The mean age of patients within the CD-S and their comparator cohorts was higher than in the CD-F or CD-FS cohorts (59.9 vs 49.5 vs 49.6 years). At baseline, cardiovascular disease was the most common comorbidity across all condition and comparator cohorts. Condition cohorts had 2-4 times more inpatient visits, 5-8 times more surgical visits, and 2-3 times more endoscopies PPPY than comparator cohorts. Compared with their respective comparator cohort, patients in the 3 condition cohorts had higher medication, medical, and total health care costs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a significant economic burden related to fistulas and/or strictures among patients with CD, highlighting the importance of prevention, early recognition, and appropriate management of CD-related complications. DISCLOSURES: Yanni Fan, Ling Zhang, Jennifer S Thompson, and Kimberly G Brodovicz are employees of Boehringer Ingelheim. Rhonda L Bohn, Monik C Jiménez, and Stephani Gray (Bohn Epidemiology, LLC) are paid consultants to Boehringer Ingelheim. Gil Y Melmed reports receiving grants from Pfizer; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, AbbVie, Arena, BMS, Celgene, Entasis, Ferring Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Medtronic, Samsung Bioepis, Janssen, Takeda, Pfizer, Prometheus Labs, and TechLab. We conducted a retrospective study using administrative claims data from the Optum Research Database, a database of a commercially insured population in the United States. All patient data were anonymized and deidentified; therefore, informed consent was not necessary. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data because of a contract between Optum and Boehringer Ingelheim, and data are thus unavailable to the public. For enquiries on the dataset analyzed in this study, please contact Optum (https://www.optum.com).