Bariatric Surgery in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Case-Control Study from the GETAID

Bariatric surgery and relevant comorbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a growing epidemic in the United States, and with this, has come an increasing volume of metabolic surgery operations. The ideal management of obesity-associated medical conditions surrounding these operations is yet to be determined. This review sought to investigate the routine use of intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) with cholecystectomy during or after a bypass-type operation, the ideal management of post-sleeve gastrectomy gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and the optimal bariatric operation in patients with known inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

Using medical literature databases, searches were performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized comparative studies from 1990 to 2022. Each study was screened by two independent reviewers from the SAGES Guidelines Committee for eligibility. Data were extracted while assessing the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for RCTs and cohort studies, respectively. A meta-analysis was performed using random effects.

RESULTS

Routine use of IOC was associated with a significantly decreased rate of common bile duct injury and a trend towards decreased intraoperative complications, perioperative complications, and mortality. The rates of reoperation, postoperative pancreatitis, cholangitis, and choledocholithiasis were low in the routine use of the IOC group, but no non-routine use studies evaluated these outcomes. After sleeve gastrectomy, GERD-specific quality of life was significantly higher in the surgically treated group compared to the medically treated group. Bypass-type operations had worse outcomes of IBD sequelae than sleeve gastrectomy, including pain, patient perception, and fistula formation. Sleeve patients had lower mortality and fewer short- and long-term complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-quality data limited the conclusions that were drawn; however, trends were observed favoring the routine use of IOC during cholecystectomy for patients with bypass-type anatomy, surgical treatment of GERD post-sleeve gastrectomy, and sleeve gastrectomy in IBD patients. Future research proposals are suggested to further answer the questions posed.

Outcomes of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Long-Term Retrospective Analysis

Background: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is a well-established treatment for severe obesity, yet its effects in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are not well understood. MBS in this population presents unique challenges, including the potential for exacerbating inflammatory disease activity and causing complications such as malnutrition and medication malabsorption. This study aims to assess the long-term outcomes of MBS in IBD patients, focusing on both metabolic outcomes and its impact on the course of IBD. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 20 patients with IBD who underwent MBS at a tertiary center between 2005 and 2019. Data on baseline characteristics, surgical procedures, complications, weight loss, resolution of obesity-related diseases, and IBD-related outcomes were collected. Results: The cohort, primarily female (65%), had a mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) of 40.8 kg/m2. The MBS procedures performed were sleeve gastrectomy (n = 9), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 6), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (n = 2), and Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (n = 3). No major 30-day complications were recorded. At a median follow-up of 91 months, the mean BMI decreased by 9.5 kg/m2, with satisfactory outcomes in terms of resolution of obesity-related diseases. IBD activity scores increased postoperatively, particularly in Crohn's disease (CD) patients, although these changes were not statistically significant. In addition, 30% of patients were hospitalized due to IBD exacerbation, and 15% required surgical intervention for IBD. Conclusions: MBS is an effective treatment for severe obesity and its related diseases in IBD patients. While encountering no major complications or mortality, some long-term complications were observed, with a possible increase in IBD activity, particularly in CD patients. Ongoing challenges, such as the risk of malnutrition, medication malabsorption, and postoperative IBD exacerbations, necessitate careful long-term follow-up.

SAGES guidelines for the management of comorbidities relevant to metabolic and bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients who are under consideration for or have undergone metabolic and bariatric surgery frequently have comorbid medical conditions that may make their perioperative care more complex. These recommendations address routine intraoperative cholangiography in patients with bypass-type anatomy, the management of reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy, and the optimal bariatric procedure for patients with comorbid inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted including studies published from 1990 to 2022 to address these questions. These results were then presented to a panel of bariatric surgeons who formulated recommendations based on the best available evidence or utilized expert opinion when the evidence base was lacking.

RESULTS

Conditional recommendations were made in favor of routine intraoperative cholangiography in patients with bypass-type anatomy undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, trialing medical management prior to surgical management in patients with reflux after sleeve gastrectomy, and sleeve gastrectomy rather than Roux en Y gastric bypass in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The strength of these recommendations was limited by the quality of evidence available. Recommendations for future research were made for all questions.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations should provide guidance regarding management of these comorbidities in patients who are under consideration for or have undergone metabolic and bariatric surgery. These recommendations also identify important areas where the future research should focus to strengthen the evidence base.

Review article: Evidence-based dietary management of inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Dietary management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) involves more than defining a therapeutic diet. The profusion of 'expert advice' is not necessarily built on evidence.

AIMS

To provide evidence-based guidance on all clinically relevant aspects of nutritional and dietary management of patients with IBD.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the published literature was made.

RESULTS

Four pillars of management should be considered in all patients. First, nutritional status should be optimised, since myopenia and visceral obesity are associated with poorer outcomes, which can be improved with attention to their correction. Accurate point-of-care measurement of body composition is advocated to identify problems, guide interventions and monitor outcomes. Second, exclusive enteral nutrition and the Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet with partial enteral nutrition in reducing intestinal inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease have sufficient evidence to be advocated. Multiple other dietary approaches, while promising, have insufficient evidence to be recommended. Third, dietary approaches are important in symptomatic control in many non-inflammatory scenarios. Finally, guidance on following a healthy diet is fundamental to the general health of patients. Multiple approaches are advocated, but the optimal strategy is unclear. The precarious nutritional status of patients with IBD together with the risks of nutritional inadequacy and maladaptive eating behaviours associated with restrictive diets dictate involvement of expert dietitians in assessment and personalised delivery of dietary interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Four pillars of nutritional management require specific assessment and interventional strategies that should be chosen by evidence. Optimal delivery requires the skills of a specialised dietitian.

Bariatric surgery in inflammatory bowel disease: a comparative analysis of 450,000 patients

BACKGROUND

Studies were conducted to investigate the outcomes of bariatric surgery (BS) among inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to analyze previous literature, comparing the outcomes of BS between IBD and non-IBD patients.

SETTING

Not applicable.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched on 25/9/2023 for comparative studies on outcomes of BS in IBD patients. RevMan Software v5.4 was used to conduct the analysis.

RESULTS

Our analysis revealed an insignificant difference in the change of body mass index (BMI) at 1-year post-BS between IBD and non-IBD patients. IBD patients had a higher risk of acute renal failure, hemorrhage, and readmission following BS (RR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.55-3, RR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.22-2.04, RR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.17-2.08, respectively). No significant difference was observed between both groups regarding wounds, leak/intra-abdominal infection, thromboembolic complications, and bowel obstruction. A higher incidence of postoperative complications was seen among IBD patients undergoing RYGB compared with SG (RR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.43-3.41). There was a significant decline in steroid use following BS in IBD patients (RR: .67, 95% CI: .53-.84). Comparison between UC and Crohn's disease (CD) revealed insignificant differences in treatment escalation or de-escalation. Both IBD and non-IBD patients had similar lengths of hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

BS is equally effective in IBD and non-IBD patients in terms of weight loss at 1-year follow-up. Nevertheless, IBD patients are at a higher risk of postoperative complications, micronutrient deficiency, and readmission. Both UC and CD reported a decline in steroid use following surgery without a preferential advantage to a particular IBD sub-type.

Recommendations on the management of severe obesity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease of the Spanish Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU), Spanish Society of Obesity (SEEDO), Spanish Association of Surgery (AEC) and Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SEED)

Obesity is a multifactorial, chronic, progressive and recurrent disease considered a public health issue worldwide and an important determinant of disability and death. In Spain, its current prevalence in the adult population is about 24% and an estimated prevalence in 2035 of 37%. Obesity increases the probability of several diseases linked to higher mortality such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hyperlipidemia, arterial hypertension, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, several types of cancer, or obstructive sleep apnea. On the other hand, although the incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is stabilizing in Western countries, its prevalence already exceeds 0.3%. Paralleling to general population, the current prevalence of obesity in adult patients with IBD is estimated at 15-40%. Obesity in patients with IBD could entail, in addition to its already known impact on disability and mortality, a worse evolution of the IBD itself and a worse response to treatments. The aim of this document, performed in collaboration by four scientific societies involved in the clinical care of severe obesity and IBD, is to establish clear and concise recommendations on the therapeutic possibilities of severe or typeIII obesity in patients with IBD. The document establishes general recommendations on dietary, pharmacological, endoscopic, and surgical treatment of severe obesity in patients with IBD, as well as pre- and post-treatment evaluation.

Reviewing the impact of obesity on inflammatory bowel disease and considerations for optimizing management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines the complex relationship between obesity and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing their potentially shared pathogenesis, the impact of obesity on the natural history and treatment outcomes of IBD, and the management of obesity in the patient with IBD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Obesity represents a state of chronic inflammation that may not only contribute to IBD pathogenesis, but also influence disease progression, complications, and response to treatment. Increased visceral adiposity may carry negative prognostic implications for disease and treatment-specific outcomes. Antiobesity medications, endoscopic bariatric therapies, and even bariatric surgery may be effective and well tolerated in selected patients with IBD.

SUMMARY

The intersection of obesity and IBD presents a significant clinical challenge, with obesity influencing the natural history of IBD and potentially affecting treatment efficacy. As obesity prevalence among IBD patients rises, a tailored approach to management is crucial, taking into account the individualized risks and benefits of various treatment strategies, including lifestyle interventions, pharmacotherapy, endoscopic procedures, and bariatric surgery.

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the United States: An Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database

PURPOSE

Bariatric surgery has been reported to produce durable weight loss in the management of obesity; sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common bariatric procedure. Obesity is a common comorbidity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and the impact of IBD on short-term SG outcomes has not been widely reported. This study assessed whether IBD was associated with adverse post-SG outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hospitalizations of patients undergoing SG in the United States were identified using the 2010-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) and stratified by IBD diagnosis. The SG cohort was propensity-matched based on age, biological sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbid diabetes, hypertension, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and discharge in quarter four. Primary aims were to compare in-hospital mortality, post-operative complications, and all-cause 90-day readmission between patients with and without IBD. Secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS) and total hospital cost.

RESULTS

A total of 2030 hospitalizations were matched. The odds of complication were 48% higher for hospitalizations of patients with IBD (11.1% vs. 7.8%; aOR 1.48, aOR 95% CI 1.10-2.00, p = .009). The most common complication was nausea (4.9% vs. 3.7%, p = .187). No statistically significant difference was observed for all-cause 90-day readmissions, LOS, or hospital cost.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalizations of patients with IBD who underwent SG experienced significantly higher post-operative complication rates. However, the similar lengths of stay and readmission rates compared to propensity-matched SG hospitalizations without IBD suggest many complications were minor. SG remains a safe weight loss procedure for patients suffering from IBD and obesity.

Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Outcomes of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis, 2005-2018

PURPOSE

The global prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has steadily risen over the past few decades. Bariatric surgery stands out as an effective strategy for inducing weight loss. This study investigated the impacts of bariatric surgery on the clinical outcomes in patients with IBD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of hospitalized patients aged ≥ 18 years with IBD were extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2005-2018. The patients were categorized according to whether they underwent bariatric surgery or not. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the associations between bariatric surgery, prolonged LOS, unfavorable discharge, hospital mortality, and morbidity.

RESULTS

Data from 807,843 hospitalized patients with IBD were extracted. After exclusions and propensity-score matching, 80,545 patients were analyzed, with 16,109 undergoing bariatric surgery and 64,436 not. A total of 23% of patients had a prolonged LOS, 8% had unfavorable discharge, and the mortality rate was 1.2%. Multivariable analyses revealed that, compared to patients without bariatric surgery, patients with bariatric surgery had significantly decreased odds of prolonged LOS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.89; 95% CI 0.85-0.93), unfavorable discharge (aOR, 0.83; 95% CI: 0.77-0.89), and mortality (aOR, 0.54; 95% CI: 0.44-0.67), but had increased odds of morbidity (aOR, 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.13).

CONCLUSION

In adults with IBD, bariatric surgery is associated with favorable outcomes concerning hospital LOS, discharge status, and mortality. However, the risk of overall morbidity is slightly increased in those who received bariatric surgery compared to those who did not.

Newly diagnosed Crohn's disease, and hepatocellular and renal cell carcinoma in a bariatric surgery patient-dealing with the complexity of obesity-associated diseases: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery candidates commonly suffer from conditions that constitute the metabolic syndrome. But they also have a higher risk for autoimmune and malignant diseases. Obesity-associated comorbidities aside from the metabolic syndrome are often given insufficient attention in the clinical routine, including preoperative work-ups for bariatric surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION

We retrospectively report the case of a 65 years old Caucasian patient who was diagnosed with Crohn's disease prior to, a hepatocellular carcinoma during, and a renal cell carcinoma post bariatric surgery. The relevance of these diseases for decision making in bariatric procedures and current recommendations for preoperative bariatric work-ups are discussed. In our case, the diagnosis of Crohn's disease led to the performance of a sleeve gastrectomy instead of a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and a previously unknown hepatocellular carcinoma was simultaneously removed by hepatic wedge resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative endoscopy and imaging techniques can be valuable since surprising pre- and intraoperative findings can force the bariatric surgeon to change the initially planned operative strategy. But the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal ultrasound may be limited in bariatric surgery patients. With the expansion of bariatric surgery, the complexity of bariatric surgery patients is also likely to increase. However, with the appropriate awareness and strategies, bariatric surgery can be safely executed and even contribute to the treatment of severe comorbidities that exceed the metabolic spectrum.

Outcomes of bariatric surgery for patients with prevalent inflammatory bowel disease: A nationwide registry-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Obesity is becoming more prevalent in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Although bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for obesity, questions remain regarding its safety and effectiveness for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

METHOD

This registry-based, propensity-matched cohort study included all patients who had primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy in Sweden from January 2007 to June 2020 who had an inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis and matched control patients without an inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis. The study included data from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry, the National Patient Register, the Swedish Prescribed Drugs Register, the Total Population Register, and the Education Register from Statistics Sweden.

RESULTS

In total, 71,093 patients who underwent bariatric surgery, including 194 with Crohn's disease and 306 with ulcerative colitis, were 1:5 matched to non-inflammatory bowel disease control patients. The patients with Crohn's disease had a higher readmission rate within 30 days (10.7% vs 6.1%, odds ratio = 1.84, 95% confidence interval 1.02-3.31) than the control patients, with no significant difference between the surgical methods. The patients with ulcerative colitis had a higher risk for serious postoperative complications after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (8.0% vs 3.7%, odds ratio = 2.64, 95% confidence interval 1.15-6.05) but not after sleeve gastrectomy compared to control patients (0.8% vs 2.3%). No difference was observed in postoperative weight loss or postoperative health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Sleeve gastrectomy appears to be a safe and effective treatment for obesity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, whereas Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was associated with a higher risk for postoperative complications in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Obesity and novel management of inflammatory bowel disease

Obesity is prevalent within the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population, particularly in newly developed countries. Several epidemiological studies have suggested that 15%-40% of IBD patients are obese, and there is a potential role of obesity in the pathogenesis of IBD. The dysfunction of mesenteric fat worsens the inflammatory course of Crohn’s disease and may induce formation of strictures or fistulas. Furthermore, obesity may affect the disease course or treatment response of IBD. Given the increasing data supporting the pathophysiologic and epidemiologic relationship between obesity and IBD, obesity control is being suggested as a novel management for IBD. Therefore, this review aimed to describe the influence of obesity on the outcomes of IBD treatment and to present the current status of pharmacologic or surgical anti-obesity treatments in IBD patients.

Outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease from a French nationwide database

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of bariatric surgery (BS) in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remain rarely described. We aimed to evaluate the 90-day morbidity and mortality rates, and the risk of IBD complications 2 years after BS.

METHOD

Patients from the French Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information (PMSI) database who underwent a primary BS between 2016 and 2018 were included. We identified patients with a previous diagnosis of IBD. Postoperative 90-day (POD90) morbidity and mortality rates were compared between the two groups. The evolution of IBD was followed 2 years after BS.

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2018, 138 980 patients underwent primary BS, including 587 patients with IBD: 326 (55.5 per cent) with Crohn's disease (CD) and 261 (44.5 per cent) with ulcerative colitis (UC). The preferred surgical technique was sleeve gastrectomy, especially in the IBD group (81.1 per cent), followed by gastric bypass (14.6 per cent). Patients with IBD had more comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index of 1 or more, hypertension, and diabetes; P < 0.001) than those without IBD. The POD90 mortality rate did not differ between the two groups (0.049 per cent in the IBD group versus 0 per cent in the non-IBD group), but more unscheduled rehospitalizations at POD90 were observed in patients with IBD (6.0 per cent versus 3.7 per cent; P = 0.004). Two years after BS, 86 patients (14.6 per cent) in the IBD group had at least one unplanned readmission for the management of their IBD; 15 patients stayed for 3 or more days. After multivariable analysis, patients with CD had an independent elevated risk of IBD-related unplanned readmissions 2 years after BS versus UC (adjusted odds ratio 1.90, 95 per cent c.i. 1.22 to 2.97; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

In a highly selected cohort of patients with well-controlled IBD, BS did not result in added mortality or morbidity. A point of vigilance must be underlined regarding BS in patients with CD.

Exploring the Relationship Between Bariatric Surgery and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

Background

Obesity affects over 40% of Americans. Bariatric surgery is an increasingly popular and well-studied method to achieve weight loss, improve metabolic homeostasis, and resolve obesity-related comorbid conditions. While the impact of bariatric surgery on weight loss and metabolic health has been extensively studied, there is an increasing body of literature characterizing the impact of bariatric surgery on gastrointestinal health and inflammation. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) leads to inflammation in both the small and large intestine, and leads to significant patient morbidity. Similar to obesity, the incidence of IBD is also rising. Patients with IBD and obesity may seek bariatric surgery. The impact of bariatric surgery on IBD is not well understood, but critical to understand for optimal patient care. Herein, we review the currently available literature on the impact of bariatric surgery on IBD including common trends, discrepancies in findings, and remaining knowledge gaps in need of further study.

Methods

A systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE database using PRISMA guidelines was performed.

Results

We identified 12 manuscripts discussing de novo IBD after bariatric surgery and 16 studying bariatric surgery in patients with pre-existing IBD. Overall, bariatric surgery appears to be safe in patients with pre-existing IBD but may increase the risk of developing de novo IBD.

Conclusions

Further research into optimal surgical approaches, patient selection, and mechanisms on how bariatric surgery impacts IBD is needed.

Impact of Obesity on Response to Biologic Therapies in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Approximately 20-40% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are obese. Obesity is associated with inferior outcomes in patients with IBD, with lower rates of achieving remission, poor quality of life, and higher burden of unplanned healthcare utilization. Multiple cohort studies in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including IBD, treated with biologic agents like tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists have suggested that obesity is associated with inferior response to biologic therapy. This may be related to the negative impact of obesity on the pharmacokinetics of biologic agents. Pharmacokinetic studies of multiple biologic agents have demonstrated that high body weight is associated with more rapid clearance and a higher volume of distribution of biologic agents, which leads to low trough concentrations. Randomized trials in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis treated with biologic agents suggest that diet- or lifestyle-induced weight loss is associated with improved response to therapy. This provides an opportunity to explore intentional weight loss as adjunctive therapy in obese patients with IBD. However, diet and lifestyle interventions for weight loss are hard to implement in patients with IBD; hence, long-term therapy with weight-loss agents (such as with phentermine-topiramate, naltrexone-bupropion) is attractive as adjunctive therapy in obese patients with IBD.