HLA-DQA1*05 Not Associated With Ustekinumab Loss of Response and Antidrug Antibodies in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease Patients

Carriage of the HLA-DQA1⋆05 haplotype is associated with a higher risk of infratherapeutic drug concentration and higher immunogenicity in patients undergoing treatment with anti-TNF for inflammatory bowel disease

Background

The success of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drug strategies in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is altered by the development of anti-drug antibodies that reduce their efficacy. Studies have shown that the HLA-DQA1⋆05 allele increases the risk of immunogenicity to anti-TNF drugs approximately twofold.

Objective

Analyze whether the presence of the HLA-DQA1⋆05 allele is associated with the development of immunogenicity and to evaluate the disease response to anti-TNF drugs (infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA)), according to the presence of this allele.

Design

This is an observational retrospective cohort study, single center, to determine the impact of HLA-DQA1⋆05 on disease activity in patients with IBD at the Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena.

Methods

In total, 200 IBD patients were included: 109 treated with IFX and 91 with ADA. Data were collected using the computerized medical records from the DIRAYA program of the Servicio Andaluz de Salud. Response-defined as improvement-and remission-defined as the disappearance of symptoms and analytical/endoscopic signs-were assessed using activity indices (partial Mayo, Harvey-Bradshaw) in all patients. Anti-TNF drug levels were also determined, as well as the presence or absence of anti-IFX and anti-ADA antibodies. The reporting of this study conforms to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement.

Results

The HLA-DQA1⋆05 haplotype was present in 70 (35%) patients, including 39 (36%) treated with IFX and 31 (34%) with ADA. The risk of withdrawal, intensification, as well as antibody development, was higher in patients carrying the allele and on treatment with IFX or ADA.

Conclusion

In our study, we demonstrated that there is an increased risk of immunogenicity in patients carrying the HLA-DQA1⋆05 genotype, which would support the idea of screening for this genetic variant before starting anti-TNF therapy, as its prevalence is high in the general population and increases the risk of treatment discontinuation due to loss of response.

Cellular and Molecular Determinants of Biologic Drugs Resistance and Therapeutic Failure in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The advent of biologic drugs has revolutionized the treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, increasing rates of response and mucosal healing in comparison to conventional therapies by allowing the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory cases and reducing corticosteroid-related side effects. However, biologic therapies (anti-TNFα inhibitors, anti-α4β7 integrin and anti-IL12/23) are still burdened by rates of response that hover around 40% (in biologic-naïve patients) or lower (for biologic-experienced patients). Moreover, knowledge of the mechanisms underlying drug resistance or loss of response is still scarce. Several cellular and molecular determinants are implied in therapeutic failure; genetic predispositions, in the form of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the sequence of cytokines or Human Leukocyte Antigen, or an altered expression of cytokines and other molecules involved in the inflammation cascade, play the most important role. Accessory mechanisms include gut microbiota dysregulation. In this narrative review of the current and most recent literature, we shed light on the mentioned determinants of therapeutic failure in order to pave the way for a more personalized approach that could help avoid unnecessary treatments and toxicities.

Controversies in the management of anti-TNF therapy in patients with Crohn's disease: a Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND

Despite research, there are still controversial areas in the management of Crohn's disease (CD).

OBJECTIVE

To establish practical recommendations on using anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs in patients with moderate-to-severe CD.

METHODS

Clinical controversies in the management of CD using anti-TNF therapies were identified. A comprehensive literature review was performed, and a national survey was launched to examine current clinical practices when using anti-TNF therapies. Their results were discussed by expert gastroenterologists within a nominal group meeting, and a set of statements was proposed and tested in a Delphi process.

RESULTS

Qualitative study. The survey and Delphi process were sent to 244 CD-treating physicians (response rate: 58%). A total of 14 statements were generated. All but two achieved agreement. These statements cover: (1) use of first-line non-anti-TNF biological therapy; (2) role of HLA-DQA1*05 in daily practice; (3) attitudes in primary non-response and loss of response to anti-TNF therapy due to immunogenicity; (4) use of ustekinumab or vedolizumab if a change in action mechanism is warranted; (5) anti-TNF drug level monitoring; (6) combined therapy with an immunomodulator.

CONCLUSION

This document sought to pull together the best evidence, experts' opinions, and treating physicians' attitudes when using anti-TNF therapies in patients with CD.