Proactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of TNF Antagonists in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

De-escalation of Biologic Treatment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Review

INTRODUCTION

Biologic therapy is an effective treatment for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. However due to cost and safety concerns, dose de-escalation strategies after achieving remission have been suggested.

AIM

To critically review available data on dose de-escalation of biologics [or other advanced therapies] in IBD. We will focus on studies evaluating de-escalation to standard dosing in patients initially optimised, and also on studies assessing de-escalation from standard dosing.

METHODS

A systematic bibliographic search was performed.

RESULTS

The mean frequency of de-escalation after previous dose intensification [12 studies, 1,474 patients] was 34%. The corresponding frequency of de-escalation from standard dosing [five studies, 3,842 patients] was 4.2%. The relapse rate of IBD following anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] de-escalation to standard dosing in patients initially dose-escalated [10 studies, 301 patients] was 30%. The corresponding relapse rate following anti-TNF de-escalation from standard dosing [nine studies, 494 patients] was 38%. The risk of relapse was lower for patients in clinical, biologic, and endoscopic/radiological remission at the time of de-escalation. A role of anti-TNF therapeutic drug monitoring in the decision to dose de-escalate has been demonstrated. In patients relapsing after de-escalation, re-escalation is generally effective. De-escalation is not consistently associated with a better safety profile. The cost-effectiveness of the de-escalation strategy remains uncertain. Finally, there is not enough evidence to recommend dose de-escalation of biologics different from anti-TNFs or small molecules.

CONCLUSIONS

Any consideration for de-escalation of biologic therapy in IBD must be tailored, taking into account the risks and consequences of a flare and patients' preferences.

Early Diagnosis, Early Stratification, and Early Intervention to Deliver Precision Medicine in IBD

Despite huge advances in understanding the molecular basis of IBD, clinical management has continued to rely on a "trial and error" approach. In addition, a therapeutic ceiling has emerged whereby even the most effective interventions are only beneficial for approximately 30% of patients. Consequently, several tools have been developed to aid stratification and guide treatment-decisions. We review the potential application for many of these precision medicine approaches, which are now almost within reach. We highlight the importance of early action (and avoiding inaction) to ensure the best outcomes for patients and how combining early action with precision tools will likely ensure the right treatment is delivered at the right time and place for each individual person living with IBD. The lack of clinical impact to date from precision medicine, despite much hype and investment, should be tempered with the knowledge that clinical translation can take a long time, and many promising breakthroughs might be ready for clinical implementation in the near future. We discuss some of the remaining challenges and barriers to overcome for clinical adoption. We also highlight that early recognition, early diagnosis, early stratification, and early intervention go hand in hand with precision medicine tools. It is the combination of these approaches that offer the greatest opportunity to finally deliver on the promise of precision medicine in IBD.

Neutrophil extracellular traps in inflammatory bowel diseases: Implications in pathogenesis and therapeutic targets

Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are the two main forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Among the various immune cells involved in IBD, neutrophils are the first to infiltrate and appear to contribute to the impairment of the epithelial barrier, destruction of tissues by oxidative and proteolytic damage, as well as to the perpetuation of inflammation by the release of cytokines and chemokines associated with pro-inflammatory effects. In addition to basic effector mechanisms, such as phagocytosis and chemotaxis, neutrophils can also form extracellular traps (NETs), which is made up of a mesh-like structure - which contains its chromatin (DNA + histones) together with granules and enzymes, such as myeloperoxidase (MPO) and neutrophilic elastase (NE) - and that acts as a trap that can result in the death of extracellular pathogens and/or can promote tissue damage. Recent evidence indicates that NETs also play an important and significant role in the pathogenesis of IBD. Previous studies have reported increased levels of NETs in tissue and serum samples from patients with IBD, as well as in experimental colitis. In this review, we discuss current knowledge about the formation of NETs and their role in the pathophysiology of IBD, pointing out potential mechanisms by which NETs promote tissue damage, as well as their involvement in complications associated with IBD. In addition, we propose potential targets for therapy to regulate the production of NETs, making it possible to expand the current spectrum of therapies for IBD.

Factors Associated with the Immunogenicity of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents in Pediatric Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background/Aims

Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) can develop during treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents. We aimed to investigate the factors associated with immunogenicity of anti-TNF agents in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and observe the clinical course of ADA-positive patients.

Methods

Pediatric IBD patients receiving maintenance treatment with anti-TNF agents who had been tested for ADAs against infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADL) were included in this cross-sectional study. Factors associated with ADA positivity were investigated by analyzing clinicodemographic, laboratory, and treatment-related factors.

Results

A total of 76 patients (Crohn’s disease, 65; ulcerative colitis, 11) were included. Among these, 59 and 17 patients were receiving IFX and ADL, respectively. ADAs were found in 10 patients (13.2%), all of whom were receiving IFX. According to multivariable logistic regression analysis, the IFX trough level (TL) was associated with ADA positivity (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08 to 0.51; p=0.002). According to the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cutoff of the IFX TLs for stratifying patients based on the presence of ADAs against IFX was 1.88 μg/mL (area under curve, 0.941; 95% CI, 0.873 to 1.000; sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 95.9%; p<0.001). Among the 10 patients with ADAs against IFX, five patients (50%) switched to ADL within 1 year, while five patients (50%) kept receiving IFX. Transient ADAs were observed in three patients (30%).

Conclusions

IFX TL was the only factor associated with ADA formation in pediatric IBD patients receiving IFX. Future studies based on serial and proactive therapeutic drug monitoring are required in the future.

Optimizing biologic therapy in IBD: how essential is therapeutic drug monitoring?

Proposed treatment targets for the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have moved beyond symptomatic improvement towards more objective end points, such as healing of the intestinal mucosa. This treat-to-target approach has been associated with improved disease outcomes such as diminished bowel damage, surgery and hospitalizations. Many patients with IBD require biologic therapy to achieve and maintain clinical and endoscopic remission, and antitumour necrosis factor antibodies remain the first-line biologic therapy in most areas of the world. Unfortunately, up to one-third of patients receiving this treatment are primary non-responders, and some patients that show an initial response can also lose response over time. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been suggested as a useful tool to manage patients on antitumour necrosis factor treatment, including monitoring for dose escalation, de-escalation or to switch treatment. In this Perspective, we aim to summarize evidence and guidelines related to TDM in IBD management and also discuss potential strategies to optimize biologic treatment where TDM is not available.

Real-world use of therapeutic drug monitoring of CT-P13 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A 12-month prospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab should be implemented in daily practice is an ongoing controversy.

AIMS

To assess the real-world use of TDM in an observational multicentre cohort study with consecutive patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with CT-P13.

METHODS

Between September 2015 and December 2016, 364 patients with IBD were treated with CT-P13 in 13 gastroenterology departments and were followed up for 54 weeks. Disease activity, CT-P13 trough concentration and anti-CT-P13 antibody (ACA) were recorded.

RESULTS

Steroid-free clinical remission rates at week 54 were 67.0% and 56.4% in patients with CD and UC, respectively. CT-P13 trough concentrations were measured in 70.7% of the patients. The mean CT-P13 trough concentration was 4.2±4.3μg/mL. The presence of ACA was observed in 53 (15.9%) patients. CT-P13 trough concentration was collected in a proactive approach in 62.8% of cases and in a reactive approach in 37.2%. Among patients who submitted to TDM, CT-P13 therapy was optimized in 88.7% of the reactive group and in 22.5% of the proactive group (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

In a real-world cohort of patients with IBD treated with CT-P13, more than two-thirds of the patients underwent TDM. CT-P13 optimization was much less common in the proactive approach than in the reactive approach.

The Future of Biosimilars: Maximizing Benefits Across Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases

Biologics have transformed the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Biosimilars-biologic medicines with no clinically meaningful differences in safety or efficacy from licensed originators-can stimulate market competition and have the potential to expand patient access to biologics within the parameters of treatment recommendations. However, maximizing the benefits of biosimilars requires cooperation between multiple stakeholders. Regulators and developers should collaborate to ensure biosimilars reach patients rapidly without compromising stringent quality, safety, or efficacy standards. Pharmacoeconomic evaluations and payer policies should be updated following biosimilar market entry, minimizing the risk of imposing nonmedical barriers to biologic treatment. In RA, disparities between treatment guidelines and national reimbursement criteria could be addressed to ensure more uniform patient access to biologics and enable rheumatologists to effectively implement treat-to-target strategies. In IBD, the cost-effectiveness of biologic treatment earlier in the disease course is likely to improve when biosimilars are incorporated into pharmacoeconomic analyses. Patient understanding of biosimilars is crucial for treatment success and avoiding nocebo effects. Full understanding of biosimilars by physicians and carefully considered communication strategies can help support patients initiating or switching to biosimilars. Developers must operate efficiently to be sustainable, without undermining product quality, the reliability of the supply chain, or pharmacovigilance. Developers should also facilitate information sharing to meet the needs of other stakeholders. Such collaboration will help to ensure a sustainable future for both the biosimilar market and healthcare systems, supporting the availability of effective treatments for patients.

TDM of Anti-TNF Agents: The Importance of Being Active!

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for anti-TNFα agents hass gained an increased momentum; although it is surely recommended in case of loss of response, its usefulness during maintenance therapy is still debated. Fernandes et al have added useful information in this regard.

Practical Aspects of Proactive TDM for Anti-TNF Agents in IBD: Defining Time Points and Thresholds to Target

Serum biologic drug concentrations have been associated with favorable therapeutic outcomes in inflammatory bowel diseases, while low or undetectable drug levels have been linked to immunogenicity and treatment failure. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in the context of clinical relapse can guide decision making and is supported by professional groups. Proactive TDM consists of measurement of trough concentration with the goal of optimizing drug concentration in patients with clinical response/remission. Recent findings suggest that this approach can improve the efficacy of antitumor necrosis factor agents (anti-TNF). In this article, we summarize the rationale for proactive TDM for anti-TNF agents in practice, identify limitations in this evidence base, and provide practical advice for use in the clinic.