1
|
Barnes EL, Esckilsen S, Ashburn J, Barto A, Bloomfeld R, Cairns A, Mehta K, Patel P, Dziwis J, Dunn MS, Rahbar R, Sadiq TS, Hanson JS, Herfarth HH. Extensive Colitis and Smoking Are Associated With Postoperative Complications Within 30 Days of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024; 30:1326-1333. [PMID: 37607334 PMCID: PMC11291612 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our understanding of outcomes after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) is largely based on analyses of selected populations. We created a state-level registry to evaluate the epidemiology of IPAA surgery and pouch-related outcomes across the major healthcare systems performing these surgeries in our state. METHODS We created a retrospective cohort of all patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA for UC at 1 of 4 centers between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. The primary outcomes of this study were the rate of complications and all-cause readmissions within the first 30 days of the final stage of IPAA surgery. RESULTS During the study period, 177 patients underwent IPAA surgery with 66 (37%) experiencing a complication within 30 days. After adjusting for the number of stages in IPAA surgery, patients with extensive UC (odds ratio, 3.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-9.33) and current or former smokers (odds ratio, 2.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-6.45) were more likely to experience a complication. Among all patients, 57 (32%) required readmission within 30 days. The most common reasons for readmission were ileus/small bowel obstruction (22%), peripouch abscess (19%), and dehydration (16%). CONCLUSION In this first state-level examination of the epidemiology of IPAA for UC, we demonstrated that the complication rate after IPAA for UC was 37%, with one-third of patients being readmitted within 30 days. Extensive disease at the time of colectomy appears to be an indicator of more severe disease and may portend a worse prognosis after IPAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Scott Esckilsen
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jean Ashburn
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Atrium Health at Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Amy Barto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Richard Bloomfeld
- Section of Gastroenterology, Atrium Health at Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Ashley Cairns
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Atrium Health at Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Kurren Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Pooja Patel
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Dziwis
- Section of Gastroenterology, Atrium Health at Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael S Dunn
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - John S Hanson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maspero M, Hull TL. State of the Art: Pouch Surgery in the 21st Century. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:S1-S10. [PMID: 38441240 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An ileoanal pouch with IPAA is the preferred method to restore intestinal continuity in patients who require a total proctocolectomy. Pouch surgery has evolved during the past decades thanks to increased experience and research, changes in the medical management of patients who require an ileal pouch, and technological innovations. OBJECTIVE To review the main changes in pouch surgery over the past 2 decades, with a focus on staging, minimally invasive and transanal approaches, pouch design, and anastomotic configuration. RESULTS The decision on the staging approach depends on the patient's conditions, their indication for surgery, and the risk of anastomotic leak. A minimally invasive approach should be performed whenever feasible, but open surgery still has a role in this technically demanding operation. Transanal IPAA may be performed in experienced centers and may reduce conversion to open surgery in the hostile pelvis. The J-pouch is the easiest, fastest, and most commonly performed design, but other designs may be used when a J-pouch is not feasible. A stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy can be safely performed in the majority of cases, with a low incidence of rectal cuff neoplasia and better functional outcomes than handsewn. Finally, Crohn's disease is not an absolute contraindication to an ileoanal pouch, but pouch failure may be higher compared to other indications. CONCLUSIONS Many technical nuances contribute to the success of an ileoanal pouch. The current standard of care is a laparoscopic J-pouch with double-stapled anastomosis, but this should not be seen as a dogma, and the optimal approach and design should be tailored to each patient. See video from symposium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Maspero
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ochoa B, McMahon L. Surgery for ulcerative colitis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2024; 33:151404. [PMID: 38615424 DOI: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2024.151404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) has a more severe presentation and rapid progression in pediatric patients, resulting in a greater need for surgical intervention compared to adults. Though medical management of UC has advanced with new biologic therapies, surgery continues to play an important role when disease progresses in the form of worsened or persistent symptoms, hemodynamic instability, or sepsis. The goals of surgical management are to restore intestinal continuity with a functional pouch when possible. While the literature has been growing regarding studies of pediatric patients with UC, high level of evidence studies are limited and most recommendations are based on adult studies. Similar to adults, pediatric patients who have ileal pouches created require surveillance for recurrent disease and cancer surveillance. Unique issues for pediatric patients include monitoring of growth and appropriate transition to adult care after adolescence. This review includes indications for surgical management, overview of staged surgical approaches, and the technical details of the three-stage approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brielle Ochoa
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Phoenix Children's, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Lisa McMahon
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Phoenix Children's, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Warsop ZI, Manzo CA, Yu N, Yusuf B, Kontovounisios C, Celentano V. Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Ileoanal Pouch Surgery: a Systematic Review. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:479-487. [PMID: 37758036 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarise frequency, type, and heterogeneity of patient-reported outcomes measures [PROMs] in papers reporting on outcomes after ileal pouch anal anastomosis [IPAA]. BACKGROUND Prevalence of ulcerative colitis [UC] has risen in Western countries, and one in three patients requires surgery. IPAA is a frequently performed procedure for UC, and a lack of standardisation is manifest in reporting outcomes for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] despite the clear need for inclusion of PROMs as primary outcomes in IBD trials. METHODS Scopus, Pubmed, and Web of Science databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2023 for studies investigating outcomes in IPAA surgery. The primary outcome was the proportion of studies reporting outcomes for IPAA surgery for UC, which included PROMs. RESULTS The search identified a total of 8028 studies which, after de-duplication and exclusion, were reduced to 79 articles assessing outcomes after IPAA surgery. In all 44 [55.7%] reported PROMs, with 23 including validated questionnaires and 21 papers using authors' questions, 22 different PROMs were identified, with bowel function as the most investigated item. The majority of studies [67/79, 85%] were retrospective, only 14/79 [18%] were prospective papers and only two were [2.5%] randomised, controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS Only half of the papers reviewed used PROMs. The main reported item is bowel function and urogenital, social, and psychological functions are the most neglected. There is lack of standardisation for use of PROMs in IPAA. Complexity of UC and of outcomes after IPAA demands a change in clinical practice and follow-up, given how crucial PROMs are, compared with their non-routine use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlo Alberto Manzo
- Imperial College London School of Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Natalie Yu
- Imperial College London School of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Bilal Yusuf
- Imperial College London School of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Christos Kontovounisios
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Valerio Celentano
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Darlington K, Wang A, Herfarth HH, Barnes EL. The Safety of Dilation of Ileoanal Strictures With Mechanical or Balloon Dilation Is Similar Among Patients After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024; 30:196-202. [PMID: 37043649 PMCID: PMC10834157 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic strictures occur in up to 38% of patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). We sought to compare the safety, effectiveness, and durability of mechanical dilation using a Hegar dilator to endoscopic through-the-scope balloon dilation (EBD) among IPAA patients with a rectal or ileoanal anastomotic stricture. METHODS We identified adult patients with an IPAA for ulcerative colitis (UC) who underwent a pouchoscopy between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, at a single institution. We compared the effectiveness (median maximum diameter of dilation [MMD]), safety, and durability of mechanical and balloon dilation using standard statistical comparisons. RESULTS A total 74 patients had a stricture at the ileoanal anastomosis and underwent at least 1 mechanical or balloon dilation. The MMD with mechanical dilation was 19 (interquartile range [IQR], 18-20) mm for the first dilation and 20 (IQR, 18-20) mm for the second and third dilations. With balloon dilation, the MMD was 12 (IQR, 12-18) mm for the first dilation, 15 (IQR, 12-16.5) mm for the second dilation, and 18 (IQR, 15-18.5) mm for the third dilation. Patients undergoing mechanical dilation experienced a longer duration to second dilation (median 191 days vs 53 days: P < .001), with no difference in complications such as bleeding or perforation noted. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with ileoanal and rectal strictures, mechanical and balloon approaches to dilation demonstrated similar safety profiles and effectiveness. Mechanical dilation with Hegar dilators appears to be an effective and safe approach to the treatment of distal strictures after IPAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Darlington
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Annmarie Wang
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barnes EL, Dunn MS, Ashburn J, Barto A, Bloomfeld R, Cairns A, Mehta K, Patel P, Dziwis J, Esckilsen S, Rahbar R, Sadiq TS, Hanson JS, Herfarth HH. Extraintestinal Manifestations and Family History of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Increase the Risk of Pouchitis in a State-Level Epidemiology Study. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2024; 15:e00670. [PMID: 38146854 PMCID: PMC10887435 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Our understanding of the epidemiology of inflammatory conditions of the pouch and effectiveness of treatment is largely based on selected populations. We created a state-level registry to evaluate the incidence of pouchitis and the effectiveness of treatments used in an initial episode of pouchitis. METHODS In a state-level retrospective cohort of all patients undergoing proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, we evaluated the incidence of pouchitis and compared the proportion of patients developing recurrent pouchitis and chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis according to initial antibiotic therapy. RESULTS A total of 177 patients underwent surgery with 49 (28%) developing pouchitis within the 12 months after the final stage of IPAA. Patients with extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were significantly more likely to develop pouchitis within the first 12 months after IPAA (adjusted odds ratio 2.45, 95% confidence interval 1.03-5.81) after adjusting for family history of IBD (adjusted odds ratio 3.50, 95% 1.50-8.18). When comparing the proportion of patients who developed recurrent pouchitis or chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis with those who experienced an isolated episode of pouchitis, there were no significant differences among the initial antibiotic regimens used. DISCUSSION In a state-level examination of outcomes after IPAA for ulcerative colitis, patients with extraintestinal manifestations of IBD were more likely to develop pouchitis; however, the initial antibiotic regimen chosen did not seem to affect long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward L. Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael S. Dunn
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jean Ashburn
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Atrium Health at Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amy Barto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Richard Bloomfeld
- Section of Gastroenterology, Atrium Health at Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ashley Cairns
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Atrium Health at Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kurren Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Pooja Patel
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer Dziwis
- Section of Gastroenterology, Atrium Health at Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Scott Esckilsen
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Reza Rahbar
- North Carolina Surgery, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - John S. Hanson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hans H. Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Plietz MC, Coste M, Miller J, Kayal M, Chuquin KEP, Rizvi A, Bangla VG, Dubinsky MC, Khaitov S, Sylla PA, Greenstein AJ. Emergent Subtotal Colectomies Have Higher Leak Rates in Subsequent J-Pouch Stages. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:760-765. [PMID: 36913174 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05631-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The most common surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC) is the staged restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). On occasion, an emergent first-stage subtotal colectomy must be performed. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of postoperative complications in three-stage IPAA patients who underwent emergent vs non-emergent first-stage subtotal colectomies in the subsequent staged procedures. METHODS This was a retrospective chart review conducted at a single tertiary care inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center. All UC or IBD-Unspecified patients who underwent a three-stage IPAA between 2008 and 2017 were identified. Emergent surgery was defined as that performed on an inpatient who had perforation, toxic megacolon, uncontrolled hemorrhage, or septic shock. The primary outcomes were the presence of anastomotic leak, obstruction, bleeding, and the need for reoperation for each within a 6-month postoperative period of the second (RPC with IPAA and DLI) and third surgical stages (ileostomy reversal). RESULTS A total of 342 patients underwent a three-stage IPAA, of which 30 (9.4%) had emergent first-stage operations. Patients who underwent an emergent STC were more likely to have a post-operative anastomotic leak and need an additional procedure following the subsequent second and third-staged operations on both univariate and multivariate analysis (p < 0.05). No difference was found for obstruction, wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess, or bleeding (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Three-stage IPAA patients with emergent first-stage subtotal colectomies were more likely to have a post-operative anastomotic leak and need an additional procedure for a leak following the subsequent second- and third-stage operations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Plietz
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marine Coste
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Jeremy Miller
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maia Kayal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kathryn Ely Pierce Chuquin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anam Rizvi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Venu Gopal Bangla
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marla C Dubinsky
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sergey Khaitov
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Patricia A Sylla
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sherrill GC, Esckilsen S, Hudson J, Kochar B, Herfarth HH, Barnes EL. Relationship Between Stages of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis, Timing of Restoration of Fecal Continuity, and Pouchitis. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:5220-5226. [PMID: 35246803 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07440-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The most common complication following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is pouchitis. AIMS We aimed to investigate whether a shorter period between pouch creation and restoration of fecal flow through an IPAA was associated with an increased risk of development of pouchitis within the first 2 years after IPAA. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients undergoing colectomy with IPAA for UC between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2016. We used Kaplan-Meier testing and Cox Proportional Hazards Modeling to evaluate the relationship between the time between restoration of fecal continuity and time to subsequent development of pouchitis, adjusting for other clinical and demographic factors. RESULTS We identified 624 patients who underwent proctocolectomy with IPAA for UC, of whom 246 (39%) developed pouchitis within the first 2 years after IPAA. There was no difference when comparing the median time to restoration of continuity among those patients who developed pouchitis and those who did not (49 days vs. 49 days, p = 0.85) or in multivariable analysis. Primary sclerosing cholangitis (Hazard Ratio [HR] 2.14, 95% CI 1.12-4.08), family history of inflammatory bowel disease (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.08-2.06), and delayed pouch creation (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-1.00) were significantly associated with time to development of pouchitis. CONCLUSION Although a staged approach to IPAA may have benefits in the surgical management of UC, the timing interval between pouch creation and restoration of continuity did not impact the subsequent development of early pouchitis in this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary C Sherrill
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 321 S. Columbia St., Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
| | - Scott Esckilsen
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 126 Macnider Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Joshua Hudson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #7080, 130 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA
| | - Bharati Kochar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Crohn's & Colitis Center, 165 Cambridge Street, 9th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,Clinical Translational Epidemiology Unit, The Mongan Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #7080, 130 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA.,Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #7080, 130 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA. .,Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. .,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shore BM, Kochar B, Herfarth HH, Barnes EL. Current Perspectives on Indications for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Older Patients. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2022; 15:163-170. [PMID: 36176671 PMCID: PMC9514131 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s340338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The population of older patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is expected to continue to increase in the coming decades, which necessitates and improved understanding of the critical issues faced by patients in this population. Although restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA remains the surgical procedure of choice for the majority of patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) and UC-related dysplasia, the evidence surrounding surgery for older patients UC remains sparse. In particular, comparisons of outcomes among older and younger patients undergoing IPAA and comparisons between older patients undergoing IPAA and those undergoing proctocolectomy with end ileostomy remain an understudied and important issue, as evidence in this area will be used to guide patient-centered surgical choices among older patients who require colectomy for UC. In this narrative review, we review the available literature regarding IPAA for older patients, as well as the pre-, peri-, and postoperative factors that may influence outcomes in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon M Shore
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Bharati Kochar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,The Mongan Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kröner PT, Merchea A, Colibaseanu D, Picco MF, Farraye FA, Stocchi L. The use of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis from 2009 to 2018. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:308-313. [PMID: 34743378 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM The existing literature was updated, assessing the use of surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis in more recent years. METHODS This was a retrospective observational study identifying all patients with ulcerative colitis within the National Inpatient Sample, years 2009-2018. All patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes for ulcerative colitis were included. The primary outcome was the trend in total number of total abdominal colectomy, proctocolectomy and simultaneous versus delayed pouch construction. RESULTS A total of 1 184 711 ulcerative-colitis-related admissions were identified. An increase of 18.6% in the number of patients was observed, while the number of surgeries decreased. A total of 40 499 patients underwent total colectomy, annually decreasing from 5241 to 3185. The number of proctocolectomies without pouch decreased from 1191 to 530, while the number of patients undergoing pouch construction decreased from 2225 to 1284. The proportion of patients undergoing initial pouch at time of proctocolectomy decreased from 995 (45%) to 265 (21%), while the proportion of patients undergoing delayed pouch construction in 2018 was 79% (n = 1120). CONCLUSION Surgery use in ulcerative colitis has decreased in the last decade despite increasing numbers of hospital admissions in patients with this condition. While the overall proportion of patients undergoing pouch construction remained stable, the majority of patients were initially treated with total colectomy and their ileal pouches werre constructed in a delayed fashion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul T Kröner
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Amit Merchea
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Dorin Colibaseanu
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Michael F Picco
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Luca Stocchi
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Risto A, Abdalla M, Myrelid P. Staging Pouch Surgery in Ulcerative Colitis in the Biological Era. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35:58-65. [PMID: 35069031 PMCID: PMC8763463 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy, or ileal pouch anal anastomosis, is considered the standard treatment for intractable ulcerative colitis. When the pelvic pouch was first introduced in 1978, a two-stage procedure with proctocolectomy, construction of the pelvic pouch, and a diverting loop with subsequent closure were suggested. Over the decades that the pelvic pouch has been around, some principal technical issues have been addressed to improve the method. In more recent days the laparoscopic approach has been additionally introduced. During the same time-period the medical arsenal has developed far more with the increasing use of immune modulators and the introduction of biologicals. Staging of restorative proctocolectomy with a pelvic pouch refers to how many sessions, or stages, the procedure should be divided into. The main goal with restorative proctocolectomy is a safe operation with optimal short- and long-term function. In this paper we aim to review the present knowledge and views on staging of the pouch procedure in ulcerative colitis, especially with consideration to the treatment with biologicals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Risto
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Maie Abdalla
- Department of Surgery, Vrinnevi Hospital, Norrköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Pär Myrelid
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden,Address for correspondence Pär Myrelid, MD, PhD Department of Surgery, Linköping University HospitalSE-581 85 LinköpingSweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang Z, He X, Hu J, Zheng Z, Chen Y, Tang J, Li S, Ke J, Lian L, Lan P, Wu X. Split stoma with delayed anastomosis may be preferred for 2-stage surgical resection in high-risk patients with Crohn's disease. Surgery 2021; 171:1486-1493. [PMID: 34863524 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.10.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal diversion after bowel resection is a safe and effective procedure in high-risk patients with Crohn's disease, but the better approach between primary anastomosis with protective stoma and split stoma with delayed anastomosis has not yet been investigated. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of these approaches in high-risk patients with Crohn's disease. METHODS A retrospective investigation on consecutive high-risk patients with Crohn's disease was conducted at a tertiary referral hospital from August 2009 to March 2019. The primary outcomes were the overall early postoperative complications and overall anastomosis-related adverse events in an intention-to-treat approach. RESULTS A total of 118 consecutive patients who underwent 121 surgeries (35 procedures with a protective stoma and 86 procedures with a split stoma) were enrolled. After a median follow-up period of 659 days and 728 days, respectively, 25 patients underwent a stoma-reversal procedure in the protective-stoma group, and 54 patients underwent delayed anastomosis in the split stoma group. Overall, early 30-day surgical morbidity and anastomosis-related adverse events were observed in more patients in the protective-stoma group than in the split-stoma group (51.4% [18/35] vs 30.2% [26/86]; P = .028 and 37.1% [13/35] vs 2.3% [2/86]; P < .001, respectively; intention-to-treat analysis). Similar results were found in the per-protocol analysis (44.0% [11/25] vs 20.4% [11/54]; P = .029 and 36.0% [12/25] vs 3.7% [2/54]; P < .001, respectively.) CONCLUSION: Split stoma with delayed anastomosis is associated with a reduction in anastomotic adverse events and overall early surgical complications and thus may be a better surgical option for high-risk patients with Crohn's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zongjin Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaowen He
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiancong Hu
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zheyu Zheng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yongle Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jian Tang
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Senmao Li
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jia Ke
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Lei Lian
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ping Lan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Xiaojian Wu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Plietz MC, Kayal M, Rizvi A, Bangla VG, Khetan P, LaChapelle CR, Whitney SL, Huber HM, Hwa Walter Wang Y, Radcliffe M, Khaitov S, Sylla PA, Dubinsky MC, Greenstein AJ. Slow and Steady Wins the Race: A Solid Case for a 3-Stage Approach in Ulcerative Colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:1511-1520. [PMID: 34561342 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 10% to 20% of patients with ulcerative colitis require surgery during their disease course, of which the most common is the staged restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA. OBJECTIVE The aim was to compare the rates of anastomotic leaks among all staged restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA procedures. DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS This study was conducted at a single tertiary care IBD center. PATIENTS All patients with ulcerative colitis or IBD-unspecified who underwent a primary total proctocolectomy with IPAA for medically refractory disease or dysplasia between 2008 and 2017 were identified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was anastomotic leak within a 6-month postoperative period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to compare patients with and without anastomotic leaks. RESULTS The sample was composed of 584 nonemergent patients, of whom 50 (8.6%) underwent 1-stage, 162 (27.7%) underwent 2-stage, 58 (9.9%) underwent modified 2-stage, and 314 (53.7%) underwent a 3-stage total proctocolectomy with IPAA. The primary indication was medically refractory disease in 488 patients and dysplasia/cancer in 101 patients. Anastomotic leak occurred in 10 patients (3.2%) after 3-stage, 14 patients (8.6%) after 2-stage, 6 patients (10.3%) after modified 2-stage, and 10 patients (20.0%) after a 1-stage procedure. A 3-stage procedure had fewer leaks and additional procedures for leaks compared with 1- and modified 2-stage procedures (p < 0.03). The 3-stage procedure had fewer combined anastomotic leaks and pelvic abscesses than all of the other staged procedures (p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS This study was limited by its retrospective design and evolving electronic medical charts system. CONCLUSIONS The 3-stage total proctocolectomy with IPAA is the optimal staged method in ulcerative colitis to reduce leaks and related complications. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B693. LENTO Y CONSTANTE GANA LA CARRERA UN CASO SLIDO PARA UN ENFOQUE DE TRES ETAPAS EN LA COLITIS ULCEROSA ANTECEDENTES:Aproximadamente el 10-20% de los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa requieren cirugía durante el curso de su enfermedad, de los cuales la más común es la proctocolectomía restauradora escalonada con anastomosis con bolsa ileo-anal.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue comparar las tasas de fugas anastomóticas entre todos los procedimientos de proctocolectomía restauradora por etapas con procedimiento de anastomosis con bolsa ileo-anal.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Este estudio se llevó a cabo en un único centro de atención terciaria de tercer nivel para enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino.PACIENTES:Se identificaron todos los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa o enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal inespecífica que se sometieron a una proctocolectomía total primaria mas anastomosis con bolsa ileo-anal por enfermedad médicamente refractaria o displasia entre 2008 y 2017.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la fuga anastomótica dentro de un período posoperatorio de seis meses. Se utilizó regresión logística univariante y multivariante para comparar pacientes con y sin fugas anastomóticas.RESULTADOS:La muestra estuvo compuesta por 584 pacientes no emergentes, de los cuales 50 (8,6%) se sometieron a una etapa, 162 (27,7%) se sometieron a dos etapas, 58 (9,9%) se sometieron a modificación en dos etapas y 314 (53,7%) se sometieron a una proctocolectomía total en tres tiempos mas anastomosis con bolsa ileo-anal. La indicación principal fue enfermedad médicamente refractaria en 488 pacientes y displasia / cáncer en 101 pacientes. Se produjo una fuga anastomótica en 10 (3,2%) pacientes después de tres etapas, 14 (8,6%) pacientes después de dos etapas, 6 (10,3%) pacientes después de dos etapas modificadas y 10 (20,0%) pacientes después de una etapa procedimiento. Un procedimiento de tres etapas tuvo menos fugas y procedimientos adicionales para las fugas en comparación con los procedimientos de una y dos etapas modificadas (p <0.03). El procedimiento de tres etapas tuvo menos fugas anastomóticas y abscesos pélvicos combinados que todos los demás procedimientos por etapas (p <0,05).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio estuvo limitado por su diseño retrospectivo y su sistema de registros médicos electrónicos en evolución.CONCLUSIONES:La proctocolectomía total en tres etapas mas anastomosis con bolsa ileo-anal es el método óptimo por etapas en la colitis ulcerosa para reducir las fugas y las complicaciones relacionadas. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B693.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Plietz
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Maia Kayal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Anam Rizvi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Venu G Bangla
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Prerna Khetan
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | | | - Stewart L Whitney
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Hans M Huber
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Yun Hwa Walter Wang
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Marlana Radcliffe
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Sergey Khaitov
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Patricia A Sylla
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Marla C Dubinsky
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Thompson DT, Hrabe JE. Staged Approaches to Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileoanal Pouch-When and Why? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 31:875-880. [PMID: 34182807 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2021.0060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch anal-anastomosis (IPAA) is commonly performed for patients with ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, and selected phenotypes of Crohn's disease (CD). Due to concerns about the effects of surgical complications on pouch functional outcomes, debate remains surrounding when and whether RPC with IPAA should be performed in a staged manner. Particularly debated are the timings of the IPAA, whether it is constructed at time of the proctocolectomy and whether to utilize temporary fecal diversion with a loop ileostomy. RPC with IPAA can be performed in one, two, or three stages, with each stage typically separated by 3-6 months. Proponents of a staged approach argue that poor pouch function, which is often a result of IPAA complications, including leak and infection, can be difficult to overcome and mandate additional, major surgeries, and that staging pouch creation and pairing with a protective ileostomy reduce those complications. However, subjecting patients to multiple surgeries and prolonging their time with an ileostomy present unique risks as well. Surgeons' experience and preference and patient characteristics need to be considered when determining operative planning. Highly selected patients with CD can be considered for RPC with IPAA, although with an acknowledgment of inherently higher pouch failure rates. Understanding the short- and long-term consequences of RPC with IPAA construction can help surgeons determine the appropriate approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dakota T Thompson
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Jennifer E Hrabe
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pruitt LCC, Bucher BT, Allen CM, Short SS. Early ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis in children: Similar outcome to delayed pouch construction despite higher comorbidity. J Pediatr Surg 2021; 56:245-249. [PMID: 33131777 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with ulcerative colitis (UC) may undergo a staged approach for restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). Previous studies in adults suggest a decreased morbidity with delayed pouch creation, but pediatric studies are limited. We compared outcomes for delayed versus early pouch construction in children. METHODS Patients with UC undergoing IPAA were selected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database from 2012 to 2018. Patients were categorized as early (2-stage) or delayed (3-stage) pouch construction based on Current Procedural Terminology codes. Our primary outcome was any adverse event. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to assess the relationship between timing of pouch creation and adverse events. RESULTS We identified 371 children who underwent IPAA: 157 (42.3%) had early pouch creation and 214 (57.6%) had a delayed pouch. Those with an early pouch creation were more likely to have exposure to immunosuppressants (11% vs. 5%, p = 0.017) and steroids (30% vs. 10%, p < 0.001) at the time of surgery. After controlling for patient characteristics, there were no significant differences in adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Children undergoing early pouch creation have increased exposure to steroids and immune suppressants; nevertheless, no differences in adverse events were identified. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liese C C Pruitt
- Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah School of Medicine, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT.
| | - Brian T Bucher
- Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah School of Medicine, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Scott S Short
- Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah School of Medicine, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Barnes EL, Lightner AL, Regueiro M. Perioperative and Postoperative Management of Patients With Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:1356-1366. [PMID: 31589972 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.09.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Revised: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Although the number of available therapies for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease (CD) continues to expand, a significant portion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease will require surgical intervention. Surgery remains an integral part of the treatment algorithm for patients with ulcerative colitis and CD, and thus multidisciplinary approaches to the perioperative and postoperative management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease are critical to improving outcomes during these periods. New mechanisms of biologic therapies are emerging and new treatment strategies focused on earlier and potentially more aggressive use of immunosuppressive therapies are advocated in the current treatment era. In this review, we outline multidisciplinary strategies for the preoperative management of immunosuppressive therapies, including a discussion of the most recent evidence regarding the safety of biologic therapy in the preoperative period. We also discuss the postoperative medical management of patients undergoing intestinal resection for CD, with a particular focus on risk stratification and appropriate therapy selection in the immediate postoperative setting. Finally, we review potential postoperative complications after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and their management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Miguel Regueiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Pier C. and Renee A. Borra Family Endowed Chair in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fecal continence outcomes are associated with the type, height, and stage procedure of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:1749-1757. [PMID: 32474709 PMCID: PMC7415023 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03626-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to analyze the quality of life in patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and to investigate the association between height and type of the anastomosis, the number of stage procedures and age, and the fecal continence outcomes. METHODS This is a cross-sectional retrospective study in patients who had undergone IPAA between 1992 and 2016 (N = 133). We sent questionnaires to 102 eligible patients (64% response rate). We used the Wexner score to assess fecal incontinence: 0 = no incontinence to 20 = complete incontinence. We used RAND-36 to measure quality of life. RESULTS Patients who underwent mucosectomy with hand-sewn anastomoses (n = 11, 17%) had significantly higher median Wexner scores than patients with stapled anastomoses (10 versus 3, P = 0.003). Lower anastomoses correlated significantly with increasing Wexner scores (r = - 0.468, P < 0.001). Quality of life of incontinent patients was diminished. Patients who were older at the time of IPAA surgery had higher Wexner scores (P = 0.004), while the time between surgery and questionnaire did not influence their Wexner scores (P = 0.810). Considering the stage procedures, multiple linear regression showed that the two-stage procedure without diverting ileostomy was significantly associated with higher Wexner scores (B = 0.815, P = 0.02), adjusted for sex (P = 0.008) and anastomosis type (P = 0.002). The three-stage procedure showed equally low complications and anastomotic leakage rates. CONCLUSION Mucosectomy with more distal, hand-sewn anastomosis and increasing age at IPAA surgery was associated with poorer fecal continence outcomes. The three-stage procedure appears to give the best fecal continence results without increasing complications. Furthermore, incontinence reduced patient's quality of life.
Collapse
|
18
|
Weaver KN, Kochar B, Hansen JJ, Isaacs KL, Jain A, Sheikh SZ, Fichera A, Chaumont N, Sadiq T, Koruda M, Long MD, Herfarth HH, Barnes EL. Chronic Antibiotic Dependent Pouchitis Is Associated With Older Age at the Time of Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis (J-pouch) Surgery. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2019; 1:otz029. [PMID: 31667470 PMCID: PMC6798791 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otz029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk factors for the development of chronic antibiotic dependent pouchitis (CADP) are not well understood. METHODS Using multivariable logistic regression, we compared clinical factors between 194 patients with acute antibiotic responsive pouchitis or CADP. RESULTS Individuals with CADP were significantly older (40.9 vs 30.8 years, P < 0.001) and demonstrated a longer disease duration before IPAA (10.3 vs 7.0 years, P = 0.004). Age ≥55 years at the time of IPAA was significantly associated with CADP (adjusted odds ratio = 4.35, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-18.7). CONCLUSIONS Although older age should not represent a barrier to IPAA, further studies evaluating etiologies of this association are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly N Weaver
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Bharati Kochar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jonathan J Hansen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kim L Isaacs
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Animesh Jain
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Shehzad Z Sheikh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Alessandro Fichera
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Nicole Chaumont
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Tim Sadiq
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Mark Koruda
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Millie D Long
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|