Clinical Pharmacology in Adult and Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Cardiac Safety of Ozanimod Use, a Novel Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Ligand, in COVID-19 Patients Requiring Oxygen: Secondary Analysis of the COZI Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

Ozanimod is a novel immune modulator that could be useful in viral pulmonary infections by reducing lung inflammation. It is an S1P receptor ligand known to induce bradycardia and more serious adverse cardiac effects, such as atrioventricular block and QT interval prolongation. We present a substudy of the COVID-19 Ozanimod Intervention (COZI) trial in which ozanimod was administered in acute pulmonary infection patients, to assess cardiac safety.

Methods

In this pilot randomized open-label trial, COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen support were randomized into 2 groups: standard-of-care + ozanimod (OZA) vs standard-of-care alone (SOC). All patients were monitored with a 14-day electrocardiogram monitor (CardioSTAT, Icentia, Quebec, QC) during their hospitalization. We evaluated the cardiac effects of ozanimod on heart rate (HR), PR interval length, and QT interval duration.

Results

A total of 42 patients were analyzed: 23 in the SOC group and 19 in the OZA group. Mean hourly HR over the first 10 days of treatment decreased in the OZA group, compared with that in the SOC group (P < 0.0001). The maximum decrease in HR occurred on day 3. The maximum decrease in HR occurred on day 3, without a significant difference between groups: 49 beats per minute (interquartile range, 42-59) in the OZA group, and 54 beats per minute (48-60) in the SOC group, P = 0.45. No high-degree atrioventricular block was recorded. QT and PR interval median values were within the normal range in both groups, without a significant difference.

Conclusions

The maximal reduction in HR occurred 3 days after the onset of ozanimod treatment in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, but it did not remain significant over the 10-day treatment period. No relevant cardiac adverse event was observed.

Evaluating the pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

Janus kinases (JAK) are enzymes involved in signaling pathways that activate the immune system. Upadacitinib, an oral small molecule, is the first JAK inhibitor approved by FDA and EMA for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD), following successful phase II and III trials. Compared to other JAK inhibitors, upadacitinib has a high selectivity toward JAK1. This characteristic could improve its efficacy and safety.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the available knowledge on the pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for CD.

EXPERT OPINION

The approval of newer targeted small molecules drug, including JAK inhibitors, marked a significant advancement in terms of effectiveness. In fact, the oral administration, the rapid absorption, the excellent bioavailability and the short serum time of maximum concentration are some of the advantages compared to biologics. The selective inhibition of JAK1 by upadacitinib allows for high efficacy while maintaining a reliable safety profile.

Upadacitinib in Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

The small molecule and oral selective and reversible Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor upadacitinib has been approved for the treatment of moderate to severe active Crohn's disease (CD) in adult patients since April 2023 by EMA/FDA.

AREAS COVERED

The approval is based on the two induction studies a maintenance study showing that upadacitinib induction and maintenance therapy was superior to placebo. The approval of upadacitinib in CD expands the therapeutic armamentarium for the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Upadacitinib is the first and only JAK inhibitor approved in patients with CD and provides a novel mechanism of action and the first advanced oral treatment option for patients with CD. Upadacitinib is approved for the treatment of other immunologically mediated disorders, including ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis arthritis, axial spondylarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and atopic dermatitis. Treatment of atopic dermatitis has been approved from the age of 12 years.

EXPERT OPINION

Upadacitinib may cause relevant changes of our current treatment algorithms for Crohn's disease. Further real-world studies and head-to-head comparisons are needed to position upadacitinib in our current treatment algorithms for CD.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Conventional Immunosuppression to Biologic Therapy

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic, recurrent inflammatory diseases with partly understood etiology and pathogenesis. The course of IBD, both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, is characterized by periods of relapse and remission with the possible occurrence of extraintestinal manifestations.

SUMMARY

During the last decades, therapeutic goals in IBD evolved toward endoscopic remission and mucosal healing creating the need for early administration of disease-modifying agents (DMAs). DMAs include conventional immunosuppressants (thiopurines, methotrexate), biologic drugs (anti-TNF, anti-integrin, and anti-IL-12/23 monoclonal antibodies), and small molecules (JAK inhibitors, S1P receptor modulators). Patients with aggressive course of disease and risk factors for poor prognosis should be treated with biologic therapy early, while conventional immunomodulators should be used in those with milder course of disease in the absence of risk factors.

KEY MESSAGES

Challenges in the treatment of IBD patients include the choice of effective yet safe drug and prevention or overcoming loss of response.

Efficacy and Safety of S1P1 Receptor Modulator Drugs for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that negatively impacts patients' quality of life. In the last decades, the therapeutic options available for the management of patients with moderate to severe UC have increased significantly, including not only biological drugs but also small molecules. However, there is a persistent need to develop new drugs that act on new targets while minimizing the risk of adverse events. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a membrane-derived lysophospholipid. The S1P gradient between tissues and the circulatory system has a key role in regulating the trafficking of immune cells as autoreactive B and T lymphocytes. S1P receptor modulators could be a safe and efficacious alternative mechanism for reducing inflammation in immune-mediated disorders, including UC, by reducing lymphocyte egress from the lymph nodes to the bloodstream. Several S1P receptor modulators have been developed and tested in UC. Ozanimod is already approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medical Agency (EMA), while etrasimod and VTX002 are still under approval. Oral administration route, rapidity and reliable safety profile are the main advantages of this class of drugs. The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence for the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of ozanimod, etrasimod, and VTX002 in UC.

Vaccination coverage in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, and healthy peers: Cross-sectional electronic survey data

BACKGROUND

Patients with immune-mediated diseases, such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of developing infections, due to disease-related immune dysfunction and applying of immunosuppressive drugs.

AIM

To evaluate vaccine coverage in patients with IBD and JIA, and compare it with healthy children.

METHODS

In the cross-sectional study we included the data from a questionnaire survey of 190 Legal representatives of children with JIA (n = 81), IBD (n = 51), and healthy children (HC, n = 58). An electronic online questionnaire was created for the survey.

RESULTS

There were female predominance in JIA patients and younger onset age. Parents of JIA had higher education levels. Employment level and family status were similar in the three studied groups. Patients with JIA and IBD had lower vaccine coverage, without parental rejection of vaccinations in IBD, compare to JIA and healthy controls. The main reason for incomplete vaccination was medical conditions in IBD and JIA. IBD patients had a lower rate of normal vaccine-associated reactions compared to JIA and HC. The encouraging role of physicians for vaccinations was the lowest in JIA patients. IBD patients had more possibilities to check antibodies before immune-suppressive therapy and had more supplementary vaccinations compared to JIA and HC.

CONCLUSION

JIA and IBD patients had lower vaccine coverage compared to HC. Physicians' encouragement of vaccination and the impossibility of discus about future vaccinations and their outcomes seemed the main factors for patients with immune-mediated diseases, influencing vaccine coverage. Further investigations are required to understand the reasons for incomplete vaccinations and improve vaccine coverage in both groups, especially in rheumatic disease patients. The approaches that stimulate vaccination in healthy children are not always optimal in children with immune-mediated diseases. It is necessary to provide personalized vaccine-encouraging strategies for parents of chronically ill children with the following validation of these technics.

Decreased Infliximab Concentrations in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Who Carry a Variable Number Tandem Repeat Polymorphism in the Neonatal Fc Receptor or Variant HLADQA1*05G>A Genotype

BACKGROUND

Multiple variables contribute to variation in patient exposure and response to tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonist biologics such as infliximab. This study aimed to assess the association between maintenance-phase infliximab concentrations and genetic variation in HLADQA1*05G>A and fragment crystallisable (Fc) fragment of IgG receptor and transporter (FCGRT) among patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out in participants with inflammatory bowel disease prescribed infliximab who were in the maintenance phase of treatment. Participants were genotyped for the presence of the FCGRT variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) and HLADQA1*05G>A (rs74291249). A point estimate of the infliximab trough concentration during the maintenance phase was determined using a standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for each patient. Other variables associated with infliximab pharmacokinetics were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 156 participants with inflammatory bowel disease were included from 2 tertiary care centers affiliated with Western University, London, Canada. Median infliximab trough concentrations were lower in participants who carried the FCGRT VNTR 2/3 or 2/2 (4.14 µg/mL; interquartile range [IQR], 6.48 µg/mL) vs wild type individuals (7.00 µg/mL; IQR, 7.66; P = .0027). Median infliximab trough concentrations were significantly lower in participants who were HLADQA1*05G>A variant carriers (4.73µg/mL; IQR, 4.79) vs wild type individuals (7.85µg/mL; IQR, 7.44; P = .0006). A significant decrease in infliximab trough concentrations was seen in individuals who were dual carriers of variant polymorphisms in HLADQA1*05G>A and FCGRT VNTR (no variants, 8.96µg/mL; IQR, 6.84 vs one variant, 4.96 µg/mL; IQR, 4.95 vs dual variants, 0.86µg/mL; IQR, 5.82).

CONCLUSION

FCGRT VNTR and HLADQA1*05G>A are associated with lower maintenance-phase infliximab concentrations, particularly among patients who carry both variants.

Treatment with Extracellular Vesicles from Giardia lamblia Alleviates Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis in C57BL/6 Mice

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic and recurrent illness of the gastrointestinal tract. Treatment of IBD traditionally involves the use of aminosalicylic acid and steroids, while these drugs has been associated with untoward effects and refractoriness. The absence of effective treatment regimen against IBD has led to the exploration of new targets. Parasites are promising as an alternative therapy for IBD. Recent studies have highlighted the use of parasite-derived substances, such as excretory secretory products, extracellular vesicles (EVs), and exosomes, for the treatment of IBD. In this report, we examined whether EVs secreted by Giardia lamblia could prevent colitis in a mouse model. G. lamblia EVs (GlEVs) were prepared from in vitro cultures of Giardia trophozoites. Clinical signs, microscopic colon tissue inflammation, and cytokine expression levels were detected to assess the effect of GlEV treatment on dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced experimental murine colitis. The administration of GlEVs prior to DSS challenge reduced the expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin 1 beta, and interferon gamma. Our results indicate that GlEV can exert preventive effects and possess therapeutic properties against DSS-induced colitis.

Discovery of Potent and Selective Receptor-Interacting Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase 2 (RIPK2) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBDs)

Receptor-interacting serine/threonine protein kinase 2 (RIPK2) has been demonstrated to be a promising target for treating inflammatory diseases. Herein, we describe the discovery and optimization of a series of RIPK2 inhibitors derived from an FLT3 inhibitor, CHMFL-FLT3-165. Compound 10w was identified to possess an IC₅₀ value of 0.6 nM for RIPK2 and greater than 50,000-fold selectivity over its family homologous kinase RIPK1 (IC₅₀ > 30 μM). It exhibited high kinase selectivity and inhibited RIPK2 to prevent NOD-induced cytokine production following muramyl dipeptide (MDP) stimulation. In an acute colitis model, compound 10w exerted better therapeutic effects than the JAK inhibitor filgotinib and the RIPK2 inhibitor WEHI-345. These robust results of in vitro and in vivo pharmacodynamic experiments demonstrate that RIPK2 as a therapeutic target shows potential abilities for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.

Recall of Care Objectives by Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

The management of IBD is highly complex, given the heterogeneity of treatment plans for an equally diverse patient population. Given the intricacy of treatment, improved health literacy may be associated with better outcomes. Methods: Patients were assessed before and after their endoscopy and for their knowledge of their disease status, their correct recall of the endoscopy results, their provider–patient communication, and communication preferences. Results: A total of 37 patients completed both surveys and were included in the final analysis. The median age was 45 years. The median number of years diagnosed with IBD was 13. Most patients correctly recalled the results of their surveillance endoscopy after their procedure (84%). Many patients (65%) felt they were equally involved in the decision making process in regard to their surveillance endoscopies. Most patients (92%) reported having results clearly explained to them. Most patients (76%) preferred receiving an email or patient message with results, and 69% of patients reported receiving results in the way they preferred. Conclusions: Most of the patients with IBD who were surveyed had adequate knowledge of their disease process and could accurately recall the results of their endoscopy. However, the delivery of health information can be optimized, as nearly one-third of our patients did not receive their endoscopy results in their preferred method.

Impact of Obesity on Response to Biologic Therapies in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Approximately 20-40% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are obese. Obesity is associated with inferior outcomes in patients with IBD, with lower rates of achieving remission, poor quality of life, and higher burden of unplanned healthcare utilization. Multiple cohort studies in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including IBD, treated with biologic agents like tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists have suggested that obesity is associated with inferior response to biologic therapy. This may be related to the negative impact of obesity on the pharmacokinetics of biologic agents. Pharmacokinetic studies of multiple biologic agents have demonstrated that high body weight is associated with more rapid clearance and a higher volume of distribution of biologic agents, which leads to low trough concentrations. Randomized trials in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis treated with biologic agents suggest that diet- or lifestyle-induced weight loss is associated with improved response to therapy. This provides an opportunity to explore intentional weight loss as adjunctive therapy in obese patients with IBD. However, diet and lifestyle interventions for weight loss are hard to implement in patients with IBD; hence, long-term therapy with weight-loss agents (such as with phentermine-topiramate, naltrexone-bupropion) is attractive as adjunctive therapy in obese patients with IBD.

Beyond biologics: advanced therapies in inflammatory bowel diseases

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are conditions characterized by persistent and relapsing inflammation involving the gastrointestinal tract at various levels. Although the etiopathogenesis of IBDs is partially understood, a deregulated activation of intestinal immune cells in genetically susceptible patients is thought to be key for the disease onset and evolution. Artificial Nutrition might affect favorably on inflammation and related cytokine storm. However, the discovery of monoclonal antibodies blocking pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., tumor necrosis factor-α - TNF-α) changed radically the management of IBDs. Anti-TNF-α agents represent the prototype molecule of the so-called 'biologics' / 'biologicals'. These compounds have significantly improved the therapeutic management of IBDs refractory to standard medications, achieving clinical remission, mucosal healing and preventing extra-intestinal manifestations. However, about 50% of patients treated with biologicals experienced drawbacks, such as primary failure or loss of response, requiring new effective treatments. Translational studies have identified other pathways, different from the TNF-α blockade, and new molecules, e.g. sphingosine-1-phosphate agonists and the JAK kinase inhibitors, have been proposed as potential therapeutic options for IBDs. These novel therapeutic approaches represent a "new era" of IBD management, especially for patients poorly responsive to biologicals. In this review, we will summarize the new pharmacological strategies to treat IBDs, and discuss their effectiveness and safety, along with future perspectives for IBD treatment.

Albumin-to-Globulin Ratio at 1 Year after Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor α Therapy Can Serve as a Prognostic Biomarker in Pediatric Crohn's Disease Patients

Background/Aims

The efficacy of biologics for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) is affected by the drug concentrations. We aimed to evaluate the importance of albumin and globulin which are known to be associated with drug concentrations as prognostic biomarkers in CD.

Methods

In total, 121 pediatric patients with CD who had received anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α therapy were retrospectively examined between January 2010 and February 2019.

Results

Relapse was observed in 48.8% of patients (59/121). The level of calprotectin (odds ratio, 2.13; p=0.03) and the albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) at 1 year after anti-TNF-α therapy (odds ratio, 0.0002; p=0.003) were associated with relapse. The AGR at 1 year after anti-TNF-α therapy was the only factor associated with the time-to-relapse (hazard ratio, 0.02; p<0.001). The optimal AGR cutoff value for the prediction of relapse was 1.47 (area under the curve, 0.916; p<0.001). The median infliximab trough level (TL) was lower in patients with AGRs <1.47 than in those with AGRs ≥1.47. Anti-drug antibody (ADA) concentrations were negatively correlated with the AGR at 1 year of anti-TNF-α therapy (r=-0.413, p=0.032).

Conclusions

AGR can be used to predict relapse. Patients with AGRs <1.47 at 1 year after anti-TNF-α therapy are more likely to have low drug TLs and develop ADAs, which increase the possibility of relapse than those with AGRs ≥1.47. Therefore, if the AGR at 1 year after anti-TNF-α therapy is less than 1.47, clinicians should monitor disease activity, assess the TLs of the anti-TNF-α agents, test for ADAs and determine the appropriate therapeutic strategies.

Targeting Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Signaling in Immune-Mediated Diseases: Beyond Multiple Sclerosis

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive lipid metabolite that exerts its actions by engaging 5 G-protein-coupled receptors (S1PR1-S1PR5). S1P receptors are involved in several cellular and physiological events, including lymphocyte/hematopoietic cell trafficking. An S1P gradient (low in tissues, high in blood), maintained by synthetic and degradative enzymes, regulates lymphocyte trafficking. Because lymphocytes live long (which is critical for adaptive immunity) and recirculate thousands of times, the S1P-S1PR pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of immune-mediated diseases. The S1PR1 modulators lead to receptor internalization, subsequent ubiquitination, and proteasome degradation, which renders lymphocytes incapable of following the S1P gradient and prevents their access to inflammation sites. These drugs might also block lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes by inhibiting transendothelial migration. Targeting S1PRs as a therapeutic strategy was first employed for multiple sclerosis (MS), and four S1P modulators (fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod) are currently approved for its treatment. New S1PR modulators are under clinical development for MS, and their uses are being evaluated to treat other immune-mediated diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and psoriasis. A clinical trial in patients with COVID-19 treated with ozanimod is ongoing. Ozanimod and etrasimod have shown promising results in IBD; while in phase 2 clinical trials, ponesimod has shown improvement in 77% of the patients with psoriasis. Cenerimod and amiselimod have been tested in SLE patients. Fingolimod, etrasimod, and IMMH001 have shown efficacy in RA preclinical studies. Concerns relating to S1PR modulators are leukopenia, anemia, transaminase elevation, macular edema, teratogenicity, pulmonary disorders, infections, and cardiovascular events. Furthermore, S1PR modulators exhibit different pharmacokinetics; a well-established first-dose event associated with S1PR modulators can be mitigated by gradual up-titration. In conclusion, S1P modulators represent a novel and promising therapeutic strategy for immune-mediated diseases.

Cannabidiol Isolated From Cannabis sativa L. Protects Intestinal Barrier From In Vitro Inflammation and Oxidative Stress

The relevance and incidence of intestinal bowel diseases (IBD) have been increasing over the last 50 years and the current therapies are characterized by severe side effects, making essential the development of new strategies that combine efficacy and safety in the management of human IBD. Herbal products are highly considered in research aimed at discovering new approaches for IBD therapy and, among others, Cannabis sativa L. has been traditionally used for centuries as an analgesic and anti-inflammatory remedy also in different gastrointestinal disorders. This study aims to investigate the effects of different C. sativa isolated compounds in an in vitro model of intestinal epithelium. The ability of treatments to modulate markers of intestinal dysfunctions was tested on Caco-2 intestinal cell monolayers. Our results, obtained by evaluation of ROS production, TEER and paracellular permeability measurements and tight junctions evaluation show Cannabidiol as the most promising compound against intestinal inflammatory condition. Cannabidiol is able to inhibit ROS production and restore epithelial permeability during inflammatory and oxidative stress conditions, suggesting its possible application as adjuvant in IBD management.

PK, PD, and interactions: the new scenario with JAK inhibitors and S1P receptor modulators, two classes of small molecule drugs, in IBD

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are immune-mediated chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract whose pathogenesis is not yet fully understood. Despite the advent of biological agents, there are still unmet needs for IBD patients, due to suboptimal rate of sustained remission achieved. Small molecule drugs (SMDs), the next generation of selective drugs in IBD, show promising results in ongoing trials.

AREAS COVERED

We describe the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic features of novel SMDs and their main differences with biologic agents.

EXPERT OPINION

Small molecule drugs are a promising class of drugs for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease with good results in inducing and maintaining remission. Hence, over the next few years physicians will have numerous options of small molecule drugs for the treatment of patients with IBD. This group of drugs are potentially easier to use over biological agents due to pharmacokinetic features such as oral administration, short half-life, high volume of distribution, and lack of immunogenicity. On the other hand, drug-drug interactions can happen with small-molecule drugs, principally due to competitive metabolic and clearance mechanisms.

Clinical Pharmacology of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract which are characterised, in part, by an imbalance in the production of several pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Although various agents are effective for inducing and maintaining remission, approximately 20% of patients are treatment-refractory and require surgery. Parenterally administered monoclonal antibody-based biologics are associated with adverse effects resulting in treatment discontinuation and/or immunogenicity, leading to loss of response to therapy. Approximately 50% of patients who initially respond to treatment with tumour necrosis factor antagonists lose response to therapy within the 1st year of treatment. Incidence of immunogenicity tends to decrease over time, but once present can persist for years, even after treatment discontinuation. Nonimmunogenic oral small molecule therapies, including Janus kinase inhibitors, are currently being developed and have demonstrated efficacy in early phase clinical trials, which has already led to regulatory approval of tofacitinib for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Differentiation of T cells into T helper cells, which are mediators of the inflammatory response in inflammatory bowel disease, is mediated by the Janus kinase signal transducer and activator of the transcription signalling pathway. Absorption and distribution of Janus kinase inhibitors occurs at the site of action in the gastrointestinal tract, and newer compounds are being developed with limited systemic absorption, potentially reducing the risk of adverse effects. The current review describes the clinical pharmacology of approved Janus kinase inhibitors, as well as those in clinical development for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

Emerging therapies for the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Introduction: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic idiopathic autoimmune inflammatory disorder, primarily affecting the gastrointestinal system. There are many patients affected that do not respond well to therapy and many others to which there is a loss of efficacy every year. The proportion of patients who have already experienced anti-TNF therapy is constantly increasing, making the development of new drugs with alternative mechanisms of action an important need for the treatment of UC.Areas covered: This review aims on emerging drugs in the treatment of UC and reviews data on their efficacy and safety.Expert opinion: UC, for many years, comparatively to CD, received little attention for several possible reasons, especially because it was not considered as a progressive disease able to induce irreversible bowel damage. This has led to lower investments by the scientific community and a slower development of therapeutic options for UC. In the past few years, this trend has started to change. In fact, new promising drugs have been developed and others are emerging with positive results. Although many treatment modalities have recently been approved, additional drugs are currently being investigated and will probably be part of the UC treatment regimen in the coming years.

Factors Influencing Drug Disposition of Monoclonal Antibodies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Implications for Personalized Medicine

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies have revolutionized the treatment of several chronic inflammatory diseases, including the inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis. While efficacious, responses to these therapies vary considerably from patient to patient, due in part to inter- and intra-individual variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) and drug exposure. The concept of personalized medicine to monitor drug exposure and to adjust dosing in individual patients is consequently gaining acceptance as a powerful tool to optimize mAb therapy for improved outcomes in IBD. This review provides a brief overview of the different mAbs currently approved or in development for the treatment of IBD, including their presumed mechanisms of action and PK properties. Specifically described are (1) the factors known to affect mAb PK and drug exposure in patients with IBD, (2) the value of population PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling to identify and understand the influence of these factors on drug exposure and effect, and (3) the clinical evidence for the potential of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to improve IBD outcomes in response to mAb-based therapy. Incorporation of PK/PD parameters into clinical decision support tools has the potential to guide therapeutic decision making and aid implementation of personalized medicine strategies in patients with IBD.

Serum γ-globulin and albumin concentrations predict secondary loss of response to anti-TNFα in inflammatory bowel disease patients

BACKGROUND

Loss of response to anti-TNFα treatment occurs frequently in IBD- patients. We evaluatedthe predictive value of serum albumin and γ-globulin concentrations for treatment failure.

METHODS

Prospectively, all patients treated for the first time with either infliximab or adalimumab for IBD between 2007 and 2018 were included. All patients were tested for serum albumin and γ-globulin concentrations and were followed up until June 2018.

RESULTS

128 patients (95 Crohn's disease, 67 females, age 40.1 ± 13.7 years) were included in the study. 81patients (63.3%) received infliximab and 47 (36.7%) adalimumab first line. Eight patients (6.3%) were primary non-responders, 50 patients (39.0%) showed a sustained clinical remission and 70 patients (54.7%) developed a secondary loss of response. Meantime to develop secondary loss of response was 24.5 ± 20.5 months. Albumin serum concentrations in the clinical response group were significantly higher than in the secondary loss of response group (39.8 ± 5.7 g/L vs. 35.0 ± 5.4 g/L). γ-globulin serum concentrations in the sustained response group were significantly lower than in the secondary loss of response group (11.8 ± 2.8 g/L vs. 14.7 ± 4.5 g/L). Hypoalbuminemia and hypergammaglobulinemia were associated with the loss of response. Immunosuppressant co-medication in patients with high γ-globulin serum concentrations reduced the risk of secondary loss of response.

CONCLUSION

Low albumin and increased γ-globulin serum concentrations are strongly associated with a higher risk for loss of response to an anti-TNFα treatment. Increased serum γ-globulin concentrations may have a higher risk to produce anti-drug antibodies or a different phenotype of disease less responsive to anti-TNFα treatment.

Conjugation of Amisulpride, an Anti-Psychotic Agent, with 5-Aminosalicylic Acid via an Azo Bond Yields an Orally Active Mutual Prodrug against Rat Colitis

Amisulpride (ASP), an anti-psychotic agent, is a pharmacologically equivalent to sulpiride (SP). Because SP demonstrates anti-ulcer and anti-colitic activities, ASP with an aniline moiety was azo-coupled to salicylic acid to generate 5-(aminoethanoylsulfamoyl)-N-[(1-ethylpyrrolidin-2-yl)methyl]-2-methoxybenzamide (ASP-azo-ASA), with the expectation that it would act as a colon-specific mutual prodrug against colitis. Following a 24 h incubation, approximately 80% of ASP-azo-ASA was cleaved to form ASP and 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in the cecal contents, whereas it remained stable in the small intestinal contents. Oral gavage of ASP-azo-ASA (oral ASP-azo-ASA) delivered 5-ASA to the cecum to levels comparable with those observed for sulfasalazine (SSZ; clinical colon-specific prodrug of 5-ASA) and without detectable concentrations of ASP in the blood, indicating efficient colonic delivery. Oral ASP-azo-ASA ameliorated 2, 4-dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid hydrate (DNBS)-induced colitis in rats more effectively than oral SSZ. Additionally, oral ASP-azo-ASA lowered the levels of inflammatory mediators in the inflamed distal colon more effectively than oral SSZ. Combined treatment with 5-ASA and ASP via the rectal route more effectively reversed colonic damage and inflammation than treatment with 5-ASA or ASP alone, confirming the mutual anti-colitic actions of 5-ASA and ASP. In conclusion, ASP-azo-ASA is an orally active mutual prodrug against rat colitis with limited systemic absorption of ASP.

Innovations in Oral Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Prior to the biologic era, the medical management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was dominated by the use of aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressants. In the past two decades, the advent of biologic agents that target specific components of the immune response has greatly improved the care of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, not all patients respond or maintain response to biologic therapy and some patients develop adverse events that necessitate treatment discontinuation. Furthermore, sensitization with formation of anti-drug antibodies is an inherent limitation to administration of monoclonal antibodies. This circumstance has generated renewed interest in the development of novel oral small-molecule drugs (SMDs) that are effective and well tolerated. Several classes of SMDs are currently progressing through the pipeline and offer the promise of oral delivery and high potency. In this review, we summarize different mechanisms of oral drug delivery to the gastrointestinal tract, highlight key findings from phase II and III randomized trials of novel oral SMDs, and discuss how oral SMDs are likely to be integrated into future IBD treatment paradigms. The most advanced development programs currently involve evaluation of compounds blocking Janus kinase (JAK) receptors or modulating sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptors. Tofacitinib, an oral JAK inhibitor, was recently approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe UC. Several more selective JAK-1 inhibitors, including filgotinib and upadacitinib, have also shown positive results in phase II studies and are currently enrolling in phase III development programs. Similarly, ozanimod, an S1P1 and S1P5 receptor agonist, has shown early favorable results and is enrolling in phase III trials. As these and other novel oral SMDs come to market, several questions will need to be answered. The cost effectiveness, comparative treatment efficacy, predictors of response, and relative safety of oral SMDs compared to existing therapies will need to be evaluated. Given the modest efficacy rates observed with both biologic therapies and novel SMDs to date, the potential for combination therapy based on a non-sensitizing oral option is promising and may be facilitated by development of organ-specific therapies with pharmacodynamic activity restricted to the gut to minimize systemic toxicity.

Medical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease has become a growing concern worldwide. The chronic and progressive nature of inflammatory bowel disease poses significant challenges to the treatment and management of affected patients, straining health care resources. Therapeutic options and optimal management strategies have evolved dramatically. The treat-to-target strategy has shifted focus toward identifiable and attainable treatment targets and with the ability to optimize tight control. Advancements in our understanding of the pathophysiology led to therapeutic mechanisms that have a more narrowed focus toward gut-specific targets, improving safety profiles.

Adverse Events and Nocebo Effects in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Nocebo effects, adverse outcomes occurring in patients receiving inert therapy, contribute to adverse event [AE] reporting in randomized controlled trials [RCTs]. High placebo AE rates may result in inaccurate estimation of treatment-related AEs. We estimate the pooled rate of AEs in patients randomized to placebo compared to active therapy in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] RCTs.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched to March 1, 2017 for RCTs of conventional medical therapies for Crohn's disease [CD] or ulcerative colitis [UC]. Rates of AEs, serious AEs [SAEs], AE-related trial withdrawal, infections and worsening IBD were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included 124 CD [n = 26 042] and 71 UC RCTs [n = 16 798]. The pooled placebo AE rate was 70.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.3%, 75.4%) and 54.5% [47.8%, 61.1%] in CD and UC RCTs, respectively. There was no significant risk difference [RD] in AE, SAE or AE-related withdrawal rates between CD patients receiving placebo or active drug. A 1.6% [95% CI: 0.1%, 3.1%] increase in AE rates was observed among UC patients randomized to active therapy. Patients receiving active therapy had a higher risk of infection (RD 1.0% [95% CI: 0.4%, 1.7%] for CD, 2.9% [95% CI: 1.4%, 4.4%] for UC) although a lower risk of worsening CD (RD -3.2% [95% CI: -4.8%, -1.5%]) or UC (RD -3.7% [95% CI: -5.7%, -1.8%]).

CONCLUSIONS

AEs are commonly reported by patients randomized to either placebo or active treatment in IBD RCTs. Clinically relevant differences in AE, SAE and AE-related withdrawal were not observed.

The role of exclusive enteral nutrition in the preoperative optimization of laparoscopic surgery for patients with Crohn's disease: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence has shown that there are significant advantages associated with the use of laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease (CD). However, the impact of preoperative exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) on postoperative complications and CD recurrence following laparoscopic surgery have not been investigated.

METHODS

A total of 120 CD patients undergoing bowel resection with laparoscopic surgery were eligible for this study. Patient data were collected from a prospectively maintained database. Before laparoscopic surgery, 45 CD patients received EEN for at least 4 weeks, and 75 CD patients had no EEN. Postoperative complications, and endoscopic and clinical recurrence were subsequently measured and compared after laparoscopic surgery and during follow-up assessments.

RESULTS

Patients who received EEN had significant improvements in their nutritional (albumin, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and hemoglobin) and inflammatory (C-reactive protein) status after the EEN treatment prior to surgery (P < 0.05). Patients who received EEN also experienced fewer postoperative complications, decreased surgical site infections, and a lower comprehensive complication index (P < 0.05). The endoscopic recurrence rates 6 months after surgery were also decreased significantly in patients who received EEN (P < 0.05). However, the incidence of clinical recurrence was similar in the 2 groups at 1-year follow-up. Endoscopic recurrence was correlated with ileocolonic disease, EEN before surgery, and PNI (P < 0.05). PNI remained independently associated with endoscopic recurrence after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative EEN for at least 4 weeks improved CD patients' nutritional and inflammatory status, which in turn reduced postoperative complications following laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic recurrence on follow-up.

Targeting Cytokine Signaling and Lymphocyte Traffic via Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: JAK Inhibitors and S1PR Agonists

The inflammatory Bowel diseases (IBDs) are a chronic, relapsing inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract with heterogeneous behavior and prognosis. The introduction of biological therapies including anti-TNF, anti-IL-12/23, and anti-integrins, has revolutionized the treatment of IBD, but these drugs are not universally effective. Due to the complex molecular structures of biologics, they are uniformly immunogenic. New discoveries concerning the underlying mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of IBD have allowed for progress in the development of new treatment options. The advantage of small molecules (SMs) over biological therapies includes their lack of immunogenicity, short half-life, oral administration, and low manufacturing cost. Among these, the Janus Kinases (JAKs) inhibition has emerged as a novel strategy to modulate downstream cytokine signaling during immune-mediated diseases. These drugs target various cytokine signaling pathways that participate in the pathogenesis of IBD. Tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor targeting predominantly JAK1 and JAK3, has been approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), and there are other specific JAK inhibitors under development that may be effective in Crohn's. Similarly, the traffic of lymphocytes can now be targeted by another SM. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) agonism is a novel strategy that acts, in part, by interfering with lymphocyte recirculation, through blockade of lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes. S1PR agonists are being studied in IBD and other immune-mediated disorders. This review will focus on SM drugs approved and under development, including JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib, peficitinib) and S1PR agonists (KRP-203, fingolimod, ozanimod, etrasimod, amiselimod), and their mechanism of action.

Drug utilization and cost associated with inflammatory bowel disease management in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

There has been an increase in incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) outside the western countries. Treatment costs are an essential component for healthcare planning and priority setting. The utilization patterns and annual administration and cost of IBD medications are largely unknown in countries with an increasing incidence of disease, Saudi Arabia being an example.

AIM

To evaluate the use of non-biologic and biologic agents and their associated annual administration costs in a sample of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective chart review was performed to determine the use of biologic and non-biologic medications among IBD patients in a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Daily and the annual acquisition cost of different IBD therapeutic agents was calculated. The utilization rates and cost of each type of medication by CD and UC patients were compared.

RESULTS

Data of 258 CD patients and 249 UC patients were analyzed. Infliximab and adalimumab were the most commonly prescribed biologics among the study sample, however, their utilization rates were significantly higher among CD than UC patients (36.82% vs. 11.24%, and 20.54% vs. 9.64%, respectively, P < 0. 01). Azathioprine utilization rate was also higher among CD patients compared to their UC counterparts (71.71% vs. 40.16%, respectively, P < 0.01). However, the utilization rate of mesalazine in the UC patients was significantly higher than their CD counterparts (85.53% vs. 14.34% for CD, P < 0.01). The annual cost of biologics (including administration and lab test cost) ranged from 5572 USD for ustekinumab to 18,424 USD for vedolizumab. On the other hand, the annual cost of non-biologics ranged from 16 USD for prednisone to 527 USD for methotrexate.

CONCLUSION

Biologics are extensively used in the management of IBD, particularly CD, and their utilization costs are significantly higher than non-biologics. Future studies should examine the cost effectiveness of IBD medications especially in countries with increasing incidence such as Saudi Arabia.