Efficacy of Therapeutic Intervention for Patients With an Ulcerative Colitis Mayo Endoscopic Score of 1

Efficacy of Dose Escalation of Oral 5-Aminosalicylic Acid for Ulcerative Colitis With a Mayo Endoscopic Subscore of 1: An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic healing is generally defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) ≤1 in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, patients with an MES of 1 are at higher relapse risk than those with an MES of 0. This study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of proactive dose escalation of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in UC patients with an MES of 1.

METHODS

An open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted in 5 hospitals between 2018 and 2022. Ulcerative colitis patients in clinical remission under oral 5-ASA therapy and diagnosed as having an MES of 1 were enrolled. Patients receiving maintenance therapy other than 5-ASA and immunomodulator were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a dose-escalated (intervention) or constant dose (control) of 5-ASA. Concomitant immunomodulator was used as the stratification factor in the randomization. The primary end point was relapse within 1 year. The subgroup analysis was stratified for the use of immunomodulators.

RESULTS

The full analysis set included 79 patients (39 intervention and 40 control). Immunomodulators were used in 20 (25.3%) patients. Relapse was less in the intervention group (15.4%) than the control group (37.5%; P = .026). In the subgroup with concomitant immunomodulators, relapse was also less in the intervention group (10.0%) than the control group (70.0%; P = .020). In patients without immunomodulators, the difference was not significant between 2 groups (intervention, 17.2%; control, 26.7%; P = .53).

CONCLUSIONS

Dose escalation of 5-ASA reduced relapse within 1 year in UC patients in clinical remission with an MES of 1.

Histological healing as a predictor of sustained clinical remission in paediatric ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to assess the longitudinal impact of endoscopic healing (EH) and histological healing (HH) in a cohort of paediatric patients affected by ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-centre longitudinal study. 86 children with UC who underwent endoscopic re-assessment while in clinical and biochemical remission were included. Partial EH was defined as a Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES) of 1 and complete EH was defined as a MES of 0. HH was defined as the absence of active inflammation in all biopsies. The cumulative incidence of clinical relapse was evaluated during follow-up.

RESULTS

At the second endoscopic re-evaluation, 59 (68.6%) patients achieved EH (MES ≤1). Of these patients, 39 (66%) achieved complete EH. 20 of the 39 patients who achieved complete EH attained complete HH. Patients who achieved partial and complete EH showed higher recurrence-free survival rates compared to those who did not (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Amongst patients with complete EH, those who achieved complete HH had lower recurrence rates when compared to patients who still showed microscopic inflammation (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

Achievement of EH and HH is associated with fewer disease relapses, with patients achieving HH showing longer relapse-free survival rates.

Predictive models for endoscopic disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis: Practical machine learning-based modeling and interpretation

Background

Endoscopic disease activity monitoring is important for the long-term management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), there is currently no widely accepted non-invasive method that can effectively predict endoscopic disease activity. We aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for predicting it, which are desired to reduce the frequency of endoscopic examinations and related costs.

Methods

The patients with a diagnosis of UC in two hospitals from January 2016 to January 2021 were enrolled in this study. Thirty nine clinical and laboratory variables were collected. All patients were divided into four groups based on MES or UCEIS scores. Logistic regression (LR) and four ML algorithms were applied to construct the prediction models. The performance of models was evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, precision, F1 score, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). Then Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) was applied to determine the importance of the selected variables and interpret the ML models.

Results

A total of 420 patients were entered into the study. Twenty four variables showed statistical differences among the groups. After synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) oversampling and RFE variables selection, the random forests (RF) model with 23 variables in MES and the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model with 21 variables in USEIS, had the greatest discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.8192 in MES and 0.8006 in UCEIS in the test set). The results obtained from SHAP showed that albumin, rectal bleeding, and CRP/ALB contributed the most to the overall model. In addition, the above three variables had a more balanced contribution to each classification under the MES than the UCEIS according to the SHAP values.

Conclusion

This proof-of-concept study demonstrated that the ML model could serve as an effective non-invasive approach to predicting endoscopic disease activity for patients with UC. RF and XGBoost, which were first introduced into data-based endoscopic disease activity prediction, are suitable for the present prediction modeling.

Pretreatment with millet-derived selenylated soluble dietary fiber ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice by regulating inflammation and maintaining gut microbiota balance

Inflammatory activation and intestinal flora imbalance play key roles in the development and progression of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Soluble dietary fiber (SDF) and selenium have been proven to be effective for preventing and relieving IBD. This study investigated and compared the therapeutic efficacy of millet-derived selenylated-soluble dietary fiber (Se-SDF) against dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice alone or through the synergistic interaction between selenium and SDF. In female mice, Se-SDF markedly alleviated body weight loss, decreased colon length, reduced histological damage scores, and enhanced IL-10 expression to maintain the barrier function of intestinal mucosa compared to male mice. The 16S rRNA sequence analysis further indicated that pretreatment with Se-SDF restored the gut microbiota composition in female mice by increasing the relative abundance of Lactobacillus and the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio. In conclusion, these findings demonstrated that Se-SDF can protect against DSS-induced colitis in female mice by regulating inflammation and maintaining gut microbiota balance. This study, therefore, provides new insights into the development of Se-SDF as a supplement for the prevention and treatment of colitis.

Endoscopic mucosal healing and histologic remission in ulcerative colitis: a systematic literature review of clinical, quality-of-life and economic outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This systematic literature review (SLR) assessed the effects of endoscopic mucosal healing and histologic remission on clinical, quality-of-life (QoL), and economic outcomes in adults with ulcerative colitis (UC) in the real-world setting.

METHODS

Literature searches of Embase and MEDLINE (6 July 2020) and conference proceedings (2017-2020) were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Eligible studies included adults with UC with documented endoscopic mucosal healing or histologic remission. Clinical, QoL, and economic outcomes were extracted and narratively synthesized.

RESULTS

Of 1603 studies screened, 25 met eligibility criteria and collectively included 2813 patients (mean age: 34-60 years). The most commonly reported indices were Mayo endoscopic score (MES) for endoscopic mucosal healing (n = 22, 88%) and Geboes score (n = 5, 20%) for histologic outcomes. The most frequently reported clinical outcome was relapse-free survival (n = 15, 60%). Less commonly reported outcomes were avoidance of colectomy (n = 5, 20%), hospitalization (n = 4, 16%), clinical remission (n = 4, 16%), and steroid-free clinical remission (n = 3, 12%). Most studies reported relapse-free survival rates up to 50% over 6-48 months of follow-up in endoscopic mucosal healing cohorts. Studies reporting results by MES demonstrated higher relapse-free survival rates among patients with MES 0 than with MES 1 (32%-100% vs 26%-86%, respectively). Similarly, patients with histologic remission had better relapse-free survival rates over 12-24 months of follow-up compared with those without histologic remission (72%-91% vs 40%-63%, respectively). Rates of clinical remission, steroid-free remission, hospitalization, and colectomy avoidance were also better among patients with endoscopic mucosal healing and histologic remission. Two studies examining QoL reported endoscopic mucosal healing was associated with improved QoL. No study reported economic outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This SLR demonstrated consistent evidence of improved clinical outcomes among UC patients with endoscopic mucosal healing and histologic remission.

Endoscopic activity in inflammatory bowel disease: clinical significance and application in practice

Endoscopy is vital for diagnosing, assessing treatment response, and monitoring surveillance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). With the growing importance of mucosal healing as a treatment target, the assessment of disease activity by endoscopy has been accepted as the standard of care for IBD. There are many endoscopic activity indices for facilitating standardized reporting of the gastrointestinal mucosal appearance in IBD, and each index has its strengths and weaknesses. Although most endoscopic indices do not have a clear-cut validated definition, endoscopic remission or mucosal healing is associated with favorable outcomes, such as a decreased risk of relapse. Therefore, experts suggest utilizing endoscopic indices for monitoring disease activity and optimizing treatment to achieve remission. However, the regular monitoring of endoscopic activity is limited in practice owing to several factors, such as the complexity of the procedure, time consumption, inter-observer variability, and lack of a clear-cut, validated definition of endoscopic response or remission. Although experts have recently suggested consensus-based definitions, further studies are needed to define the values that can predict long-term outcomes.

Automated evaluation of colon capsule endoscopic severity of ulcerative colitis using ResNet50

Capsule endoscopy has been widely used as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for small or large intestinal lesions. In recent years, automated lesion detection systems using machine learning have been devised. This study aimed to develop an automated system for capsule endoscopic severity in patients with ulcerative colitis along the entire length of the colon using ResNet50. Capsule endoscopy videos from patients with ulcerative colitis were collected prospectively. Each single examination video file was partitioned into four segments: the cecum and ascending colon, transverse colon, descending and sigmoid colon, and rectum. Fifty still pictures (576 × 576 pixels) were extracted from each partitioned video. A patch (128 × 128 pixels) was trimmed from the still picture at every 32-pixel-strides. A total of 739,021 patch images were manually classified into six categories: 0) Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) 0, 1) MES1, 2) MES2, 3) MES3, 4) inadequate quality for evaluation, and 5) ileal mucosa. ResNet50, a deep learning framework, was trained using 483,644 datasets and validated using 255,377 independent datasets. In total, 31 capsule endoscopy videos from 22 patients were collected. The accuracy rates of the training and validation datasets were 0.992 and 0.973, respectively. An automated evaluation system for the capsule endoscopic severity of ulcerative colitis was developed. This could be a useful tool for assessing topographic disease activity, thus decreasing the burden of image interpretation on endoscopists.

Monitoring of intestinal inflammation and prediction of recurrence in ulcerative colitis

Background and objectives: Ulcerative colitis is a chronic recurrent intestinal inflammatory disease, and its recurrence is difficult to predict. In this review, we summarized the objective indicators that can be used to evaluate intestinal inflammation, the purpose is to better predict the clinical recurrence of UC, formulate individualized treatment plan during remission of UC, and improve the level of diagnosis and treatment of UC.Methods: Based on the search results in the PUBMED database, we explored the accuracy and value of these methods in predicting the clinical recurrence of UC from the following three aspects: endoscopic and histological scores, serum biomarkers and fecal biomarkers.Results: Colonoscopy with biopsy is the gold standard for assessing intestinal inflammation, but it is invasive, inconvenient and expensive. At present, there is no highly sensitive and specific endoscopic or histological score to predict the clinical recurrence of UC. Compared with serum biomarkers, fecal biomarkers have higher sensitivity and specificity because they are in direct contact with the intestine and are closer to the site of intestinal inflammation. Fecal calprotectin is currently the most studied and meaningful fecal biomarker. Lactoferrin and S100A12, as novel biomarkers, have no better performance than FC in predicting the recurrence of UC.Conclusions: FC is currently the most promising predictive marker, but it lacks an accurate cut-off value. Combining patient symptoms, incorporating multiple indicators to construct a UC recurrence prediction model, and formulating individualized treatment plans for high recurrence risk patients will be the focus of UC remission management.

The Mayo Endoscopic Score Is a Novel Predictive Indicator for Malignant Transformation in Ulcerative Colitis: A Long-Term Follow-Up Multicenter Study

Background

Data on the relative risk of malignant transformation in ulcerative colitis (UC) are insufficient. We investigated the potential value of the Mayo endoscopic score (MES) for predicting malignant transformation in patients with UC.

Methods

Data of patients with UC evaluated at our institute from June 1986 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The MES used in the study indicated the results of the first colonoscopy after hospitalization. We defined MES of 0–1 as low and MES of 2–3 as high. Univariable and multivariate logistic regression models were used for statistical analysis.

Results

Among the 280 eligible patients with UC with a median follow-up time of 14 (interquartile range, 10.0–18.0) years, those with a high MES were more likely to develop malignant transformation. High MES positively correlated with the degree of malignancy and was an independent risk factor for UC-associated dysplasia and colorectal cancer (CRC, odds ratio [OR], 9.223; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.160–73.323; p = 0.036). Disease duration &gt;5 years (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.177–3.572; p = 0.011), immunomodulator use (OR, 4.314; 95% CI, 1.725–10.785; p = 0.002), biologics nonuse (OR, 3.901; 95%CI, 2.213–6.876; p &lt; 0.001), and Hb &lt;90 g/L (OR, 2.691; 95% CI, 1.251–5.785; p = 0.011) were contributing factors for high MES.

Conclusion

High MES could be a novel predictor of malignant transformation in UC. Clinicians should optimize the use of biologics and immunomodulators early and should actively correct anemia to improve the MES and then reduce the incidence of UC-associated dysplasia and CRC.

Residual Short-Segment Distal Inflammation Has No Significant Impact on the Major Relapse of Extensive Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Mucosal healing is a treatment target for patients with ulcerative colitis. However, the relevance of proactive treatment for residual inflammation limited to the distal colon is unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with ulcerative colitis who had extensive colitis in clinical remission and underwent colonoscopy were retrospectively enrolled and followed up for 2 years. Patients with complete endoscopic remission (CER; Mayo endoscopic subscore [MES] of 0) and those with short-segment distal inflammation (SS; active inflammation only in the sigmoid colon and/or rectum with a proximal MES of 0) were compared for the incidence of minor (only symptomatic) and major (need for induction treatments or hospitalization) relapses.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients with CER and 54 patients with SS were identified and 63 relapses (47 minor and 16 major) were analyzed. Univariate analysis showed that minor relapses were significantly more frequent in the SS group than in the CER group (hazard ratio [HR], 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-3.97), but major relapses were not more frequent in the SS group than in the CER group (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.65-4.83). Multivariable analysis showed that SS was the only risk factor significantly associated with minor relapse (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.31-4.36). When the SS group was stratified by MES of 1 vs 2/3, minor relapses were significantly more frequent in the subgroup with MES of 2/3 than in the CER group, whereas the incidence of major relapse remained similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Residual short-segment distal inflammation is not a risk factor for major relapses as long as endoscopic remission is achieved in the proximal colon. Therefore, reactive but not proactive treatment may be appropriate for such lesions.

Long-term Outcomes in Asymptomatic Ulcerative Colitis Diagnosed During Screening Colonoscopy

Treatment goals in ulcerative colitis have shifted from clinical remission to mucosal healing, and more recently, to histological remission.^1,2 Treating patients with healed mucosae has been shown to be beneficial.³ Clinical, endoscopic, and histological findings do not necessarily correlate with each other.⁴.

Treatment Targets in Ulcerative Colitis: Is It Time for All In, including Histology?

The main therapeutic goal of ulcerative colitis (UC) is to induce and maintain remission to prevent long-term disease progression. Treat-to-target strategies, first introduced by the STRIDE consensus and updated in 2021, have shifted focus from symptomatic control toward more stringent objective endpoints. Today, patient monitoring should be based on a combination of biomarkers and clinical scores, while patient-reported outcomes could be used as short-term targets in monitoring disease activity and therapeutic response. In addition, endoscopic healing was the preferred long-term goal in UC. A Mayo endoscopic score (MES) ≤ 1 can be recommended as a minimum target. However, recent evidence suggests that more stringent endoscopic goals (MES of 0) are associated with superior outcomes. Recently, emerging data support that histological remission (HR) is a superior prognostic factor to endoscopic healing in predicting long-term remission. Despite not yet being recommended as a target, HR may become an important potential therapeutic goal in UC. However, it remains questionable if histological healing should be used as a routine assessment in addition to clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic targets in all patients. Therefore, in this review, our aim was to discuss the current evidence for the different treatment targets and their value in everyday clinical practice.

Preoperative Endoscopic Activity Predicts the Occurrence of Pouchitis After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Ulcerative Colitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in China

Background: Pouchitis is the most common long-term complication after ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS) and Mayo endoscopic score (MES) are widely used indices to evaluate endoscopic activity. This study aimed to clarify the predictive value of preoperative endoscopic activity on the occurrence of pouchitis after IPAA.

Methods: Data of patients with UC who underwent IPAA from January 2008 to January 2020 were collected retrospectively. UCEIS and MES were based on the preoperative colonoscopy findings of two independent endoscopists.

Results: A total of 102 patients with a median follow-up of 5 (interquartile range, 2–9) years were included in the study. Among them, 21.6% developed pouchitis. Compared with MES, UCEIS had a stronger correlation with pouchitis disease activity index. UCEIS ≥ 7 had the most significant receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve area of 0.747 with a sensitivity of 68.2% and specificity of 81.2% in predicting pouchitis, which outperformed MES of 3 with an ROC area of 0.679 with a sensitivity of 54.5% and specificity of 81.2%. Furthermore, we found that UCEIS ≥ 7 was an independent risk factor for post-IPAA pouchitis [odds ratio (OR), 8.860; 95% CI, 1.969–39.865, p < 0.001] with a higher risk than MES of 3 (OR, 5.200; 95% CI, 1.895–14.273; p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity performed better in predicting pouchitis after IPAA than MES. Earlier and more frequent postoperative colonoscopic surveillance should be considered in patients with preoperative UCEIS ≥ 7 to detect the occurrence of pouchitis earlier.

[Position paper on endoscopic reporting in IBD]

The complete and reliable documentation of endoscopic findings make up the crucial foundation for the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases such as Crohn´s disease and ulcerative colitis. These findings are, on the one hand, a prerequisite for therapeutic decisions and, on the other hand, important as a tool for assessing the response to ongoing treatments. Endoscopic reports should, therefore, be recorded according to standardized criteria to ensure that the findings of different endoscopists can be adequately compared and that changes in the course of the disease can be traced back. In consideration of these necessities, fifteen members of the Imaging Working Group of the German Kompetenznetz Darmerkrankungen have created a position paper proposing a structure and specifications for the documentation of endoscopic exams. In addition to the formal report structure, the recommendations address a large number of attributes of acute and chronic inflammatory alterations as well as endoscopically detectable complications, which are explained in detail and illustrated using exemplary images. In addition, more frequently used endoscopic activity indices are presented and their use in everyday clinical practice is discussed.

Moderate-to-severe Endoscopic Inflammation is Frequent After Clinical Remission in Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis

OBJECTIVES

Pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by low sustained remission rates and frequent extension of disease even if clinical remission is obtained with therapy. Moderate-to-severe endoscopic activity is a risk factor for relapse while prospective evidence regarding early mucosal healing or persistence of inflammation after remission in children is not available. Our aim was to evaluate if significant inflammation is common after clinical remission and could explain the high relapse rate in pediatric UC.

METHODS

Pediatric UC patients with clinical remission, defined as pediatric UC activity index (PUCAI) scores <10, were prospectively assessed for mucosal healing by endoscopy 3 to 5 months after remission was documented. Mayo score was assessed for each segment by a blinded adult gastroenterologist using central reading. Symptomatic patients before sigmoidoscopy were excluded. Sustained remission was assessed retrospectively at 18 months follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty-two children were screened, 28 children in continuous clinical remission at time of sigmoidoscopy were included. Mayo 0 was present in 12/28 (42.86%), Mayo 1 in 2/28 (7.1%) and Mayo 2 to 3 in 14/28 (50.0%) endoscopies. Among 23 patients with follow-up through 18 months, remission was sustained in 6/12 (50.0%) with Mayo score 0 to 1 versus 2/11 (18.18%) of patients with Mayo 2 and 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 50% of children assessed for mucosal healing 3 to 5 months after clinical remission is obtained, have endoscopic disease, primarily moderate-to-severe Mayo 2 to 3 inflammation, which was associated with lower sustained remission.

Prognostic Value of Terminal Ileal Inflammation in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Background/Aims

Few studies have investigated terminal ileal lesions and their prognostic value in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). We evaluated the clinical significance of these lesions as a prognostic factor in patients with UC who were in clinical remission.

Methods

We retrospectively selected 567 of 4,066 colonoscopy reports that included positive findings from orificial observations of the terminal ileum (TI) and appendix in patients with UC. We finally recruited patients who were in clinical remission (n=204). We compared the clinical courses, including relapse and other prognostic parameters associated with UC, between the groups.

Results

The baseline patient characteristics were not significantly different between patients with (n=69, TI+ group) and without TI lesions (n=135, TI- group), although there were more never-smokers in the TI+ group (n=57 [82.6%] in the TI+ group; n=86 [63.7%] in the TI- group; p=0.005). Of note, appendiceal orifice inflammation (AOI) was less frequently found in the TI+ group (14.5%) than in the TI- group (71.9%, p<0.001). The cumulative relapse rate was numerically higher in the TI- group, but it was not significantly different according to the Kaplan-Meier analysis (p=0.116). Multivariate Cox regression analysis also revealed advanced age at diagnosis as the most significant factor (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.964; 95% confidence interval, 0.932 to 0.998; p=0.037), but neither TI inflammation nor AOI were significantly associated with the cumulative relapse rate in patients with UC in clinical remission.

Conclusions

For patients with UC in clinical remission, neither terminal ileal lesions nor AOI had significant clinical or predictive value for future relapse.

Predictive value of blood concentration of biologics on endoscopic inactivity in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Although blood concentration of biologics is an important composition of disease management in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, complexity and uncertainty of biological management encourage many disputes in predicting the outcome of IBD patients through blood concentration of biologics.

AIM

To verify the predictive value of blood concentration of biologics on endoscopic inactivity in IBD patients under different situations.

METHODS

We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science up to May 2020 and identified IBD patients as the research cohort as well as the correlations between blood concentration of biologics and endoscopic inactivity in IBD patients as the research direction.

RESULTS

A total of 23 articles with 30 clinical studies and 1939 IBD patients were included. The predictive cut-off value of blood concentration of infliximab on mucosal healing should be 2.7-10.6 μg/mL in IBD. Blood concentration of infliximab reaching 5.0-12.7 μg/mL or more increased the probability of fistula healing/closure in perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease. Blood concentration of adalimumab reaching 7.2-16.2 μg/mL or more could predict mucosal healing in IBD. The predictive cut-off value of blood concentration of adalimumab on fistula healing/closure should be 5.9-9.8 μg/mL in perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease. Blood concentration of vedolizumab surpassing 25.0 μg/mL indicated mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis patients under maintenance therapy and the predictive cut-off value of blood concentration on mucosal healing or endoscopic remission under induction therapy in IBD could be 8.0-28.9 μg/mL.

CONCLUSION

Blood concentration of biologics should not be utilized to predict endoscopic inactivity of IBD independently due to discrepancies in clinical studies, whereas conducting therapeutic drug monitoring intensively contributes to precise therapy.

Endocytoscopic intramucosal capillary network changes and crypt architecture abnormalities can predict relapse in patients with an ulcerative colitis Mayo endoscopic score of 1

OBJECTIVES

Recent studies have suggested the necessity of therapeutic intervention for patients with ulcerative colitis at high risk of clinical relapse with a Mayo endoscopic score (MES) of 1. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to demonstrate the impact of intramucosal capillary network changes and crypt architecture abnormalities to stratify the risk of relapse in patients with an MES of 1.

METHODS

All included patients had an MES of ≤1 and confirmed sustained clinical remission between October 2016 and April 2019. We classified patients with an MES of 1 as "intramucosal capillary/crypt (ICC)-active" or "ICC-inactive" using endocytoscopic evaluation. We followed patients until October 2019 or until relapse; the main outcome measure was the difference in clinical relapse-free rates between ICC-active and ICC-inactive patients with an MES of 1.

RESULTS

We included 224 patients and analyzed data for 218 (82 ICC-active and 54 ICC-active with an MES of 1 and 82 with an MES of 0). During follow-up, among the patients with an MES of 1, 30.5% (95% confidence interval 20.8-41.6; 25/82) of the patients relapsed in the ICC-active group and 5.6% (95% confidence interval 1.2-15.4; 3/54) of the patients relapsed in the ICC-inactive group. The ICC-inactive group had a significantly higher clinical relapse-free rate compared with the ICC-active group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In vivo intramucosal capillary network and crypt architecture patterns stratified the risk of clinical relapse in patients with an MES of 1 (UMIN 000032580; UMIN 000036359).

Mucosal concentrations of N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid related to endoscopic activity in ulcerative colitis patients with mesalamine

BACKGROUND AND AIM

5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is a fundamental treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). 5-ASA is taken up into the colonic mucosa and metabolized to N-acetyl-5-ASA (Ac-5-ASA). Few studies have assessed whether mucosal 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA concentrations are associated with endoscopic remission. This study aimed to investigate differences in 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA concentrations according to endoscopic activity.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted between March 2018 and February 2019. UC patients who were administered with 5-ASA medication for at least 8 weeks before sigmoidoscopy were enrolled. Mucosal 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. The primary endpoint was defined as the difference in mucosal concentrations of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA, according to the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES).

RESULTS

Mucosal concentrations were analyzed in 50 patients. In the sigmoid colon, the median 5-ASA concentration in patients with MES of 0 (17.3 ng/mg) was significantly higher than MES ≥ 1 (6.4 ng/mg) (P = 0.019). The median 5-ASA concentrations in patients with Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity ≤ 1 (16.4 ng/mg) were also significantly higher than in patients with Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity ≥ 2 (4.63 ng/mg) (P = 0.047). In the sigmoid colon, the concentration of Ac-5-ASA was higher in patients with MES of 0 (21.2 ng/mg) than in patients with MES ≥ 1 (5.81 ng/mg) (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that mucosal Ac-5-ASA concentrations, as well as 5-ASA concentrations, are higher in UC patients with endoscopic remission. Ac-5-ASA may be useful for a biomarker of 5-ASA efficacy.

Complete histologic normalisation is associated with reduced risk of relapse among patients with ulcerative colitis in complete endoscopic remission

BACKGROUND

Clinical and endoscopic remission are treatment targets in ulcerative colitis (UC). The value of histologic healing in altering clinical outcomes among patients with complete endoscopic healing is not well established.

AIM

To quantify the association between histologic activity and clinical relapse among patients with UC who were in complete endoscopic remission.

METHODS

This study included patients with UC from a prospective registry who were in complete endoscopic remission. Histologic activity was quantified by a senior gastrointestinal pathologist. Histologic activity was defined as lack of normalisation (Geboes score > 0) as well as histologically active disease (Geboes score ≥2.1 and ≥3.1). The primary outcome was clinical relapse within 2 years. Multivariable regression adjusting for potential confounders examined the independent predictive value of histologic changes.

RESULTS

The study included 83 patients (51% women) (median age 44 years; median disease duration 11 years). Forty-one (49%) had complete histologic normalisation. Within two years, 26 (31%) experienced clinical relapse. Patients with complete histologic normalisation were less likely to experience relapse (5/41, 12%) compared to those without normalisation (21/42, 50%, P < 0.001) (multivariable OR 7.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.48-24.70) by the Geboes score. The individual components of the Geboes score predictive of relapse were architectural changes (P = 0.03) and increased chronic inflammatory infiltrate (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete histologic healing using the Geboes score was associated with reduced rates of clinical relapse among patients with UC in endoscopic remission.

Solving the questions regarding 5-aminosalitylate formulation in the treatment of ulcerative colitis

5-aminosalicylate is a fundamental treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis with mild-to-moderate disease; however, evidence for 5-aminosalicylate treatment is unclear in some situations. This review discusses the clinical guidelines and previous studies, and highlights the following points: (1) Although rectal 5-aminosalicylate is effective for proctitis, physicians should endeavor to reduce patient's distress when administering suppositories or enema as the first-line therapy. It should be clarified whether oral 5-aminosalicylate alone with a drug delivery system that allows higher 5-aminosalicylate concentrations to reach the distal colon would be as effective as rectal 5-aminosalicylate therapy. (2) There has been no direct evidence demonstrating the clinical efficacy of switching the 5-aminosalicylate treatment to other 5-aminosalicylate formulations. However, switching to a different 5-aminosalicylate formulation may be indicated if clinical symptoms are not progressive. (3) Several studies have shown that colonic mucosal 5-aminosalicylate concentration correlates with clinical and endoscopic severity; however, it is unclear whether a high 5-aminosalicylate concentration has therapeutic efficacy. (4) The maximum dose of 5-aminosalicylate is necessary for patients with risk factors for recurrence or hospitalization. (5) Optimization of 5-aminosalicylate dosage may be indicated even for quiescent patients with ulcerative colitis if mucosal healing is not obtained, and if patients have multiple risk factors for recurrence. (6) Furthermore, the discontinuation of 5-aminosalicylate is acceptable when biologics are used. Because there are many "old studies" providing evidence for 5-aminosalicylate formulations, more clinical studies are needed to establish new evidence.

Capabilities of fecal calprotectin and blood biomarkers as surrogate endoscopic markers according to ulcerative colitis disease type

Fecal calprotectin level in ulcerative colitis patients is correlated with endoscopic findings. However, its association with various ulcerative colitis disease types has not been elucidated. In the present study, we investigated the correlation of fecal calprotectin level with endoscopic findings as compared to blood biomarkers according to ulcerative colitis disease type. Fecal calprotectin as well as the blood biomarkers: C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood count (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), hemoglobin, platelet count (PLT), and serum albumin (Alb) were measured in patients who underwent a complete colonoscopy. Disease type was divided into proctitis, left-sided colitis, and extensive colitis. Correlations of fecal calprotectin and blood biomarker levels with Mayo endoscopic subscore were analyzed. A total of 186 colonoscopy examinations were performed in 124 patients with ulcerative colitis. Fecal calprotectin level showed a significant correlation with Mayo endoscopic subscore regardless of disease type (proctitis, r = 0.54, p<0.01; left-sided colitis, r = 0.75, p<0.01; extensive colitis, r = 0.78, p<0.01), and clearly discriminated inactive (Mayo endoscopic subscore 0) from active stages (Mayo endoscopic subscore 1–3). On the other hand, none of the examined blood biomarkers showed a correlation with Mayo endoscopic subscore in the proctitis group, while weak correlations of several biomarkers (CRP, WBC, ESR, PLT and Alb) with Mayo endoscopic subscore were found in left-sided colitis and extensive colitis cases. This is the first report to elucidate the capabilities of fecal calprotectin and blood biomarkers as endoscopic surrogate markers according to ulcerative colitis disease type.