1
|
Alkaabi MMS, Rabbani SA, Rao PGM, Mohamedelhassan MI. Treatment patterns and factors associated with discontinuation of monoclonal antibodies. SAGE Open Med 2024; 12:20503121241271817. [PMID: 39165864 PMCID: PMC11334246 DOI: 10.1177/20503121241271817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Biological agents have revolutionized care in specialties such as oncology, immunology, infectious diseases, and genetic disorders, offering targeted actions on specific molecules or select immune cells. Monoclonal antibodies, known for their high specificity and precision, represent one of the most significant and rapidly expanding categories of these agents. Understanding the drug utilization patterns of monoclonal antibodies is crucial to ensure their optimal use, especially given their high cost and potential adverse effects. Methods This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in a secondary hospital in the United Arab Emirates. Patients of either gender receiving monoclonal antibodies at the study site were included. Treatment patterns, utilization, and factors associated with the discontinuation of monoclonal antibodies were assessed. Results Hyperlipidemia (136, 39.1%) was the most common indication for monoclonal antibodies, followed by prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus infection in congenital heart disease (104, 29.9%) and osteoporosis (42, 12.1%). Evolocumab was the most commonly prescribed monoclonal antibody (135, 38.8%), followed by palivizumab (104, 29.9%), and dupilumab (38, 10.9%). The majority of monoclonal antibodies demonstrated a prescribed daily dose to defined daily dose ratio of 1.0, reflecting their appropriate utilization. One hundred twenty-nine patients (37.0%) discontinued their treatment during the study. Patient's level of education (OR: 0.416, 95% CI: 0.183-0.943, p = 0.036), BMI (OR: 2.358, 95% CI: 1.164-4.777, p = 0.017), number of concomitant medications (OR: 2.457, 95% CI: 1.202-5.025, p = 0.014), and treatment duration (OR: 9.180, 95% CI: 4.909-17.165, p < 0.001) were identified as predictors of discontinuation of monoclonal antibodies. Conclusion This study represents the first comprehensive investigation in the United Arab Emirates focused on treatment patterns, utilization, and discontinuation of monoclonal antibodies among the local population. Monoclonal antibodies were prescribed for the management of a wide range of clinical conditions. The study reports appropriate utilization of most monoclonal antibodies and identifies factors such as patient education level, BMI, concomitant medications, and treatment duration as independent predictors of monoclonal antibody treatment discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muzoon Matar Saleh Alkaabi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, RAK College of Pharmacy, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, UAE
| | - Syed Arman Rabbani
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, RAK College of Pharmacy, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, UAE
| | - Padma GM Rao
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, MAHE, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gisbert JP, Chaparro M. Common Mistakes in Managing Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Clin Med 2024; 13:4795. [PMID: 39200937 PMCID: PMC11355176 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2024] [Revised: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Errors are very common in medical practice and in particular, in the healthcare of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, most of these can be prevented. Aim: To address common errors in the management of IBD. Methods: Our approach to this problem consists in identifying mistakes frequently observed in clinical practice (according to our experience) in the management of patients with IBD, then reviewing the scientific evidence available on the subject, and finally proposing the most appropriate recommendation for each case. Results: The most common mistakes in the management of IBD include those related to diagnosis and differential diagnosis, prevention, nutrition and diet, treatment with different drugs (mainly 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, thiopurines, and anti-TNF agents), extraintestinal manifestations, anemia, elderly patients, pregnancy, and surgery. Conclusions: Despite the availability of guidelines for both disease management and preventive aspects of IBD care, a considerable variation in clinical practice still remains. In this review, we have identified common mistakes in the management of patients with IBD in clinical practice. There is a clear need for a greater dissemination of clinical practice guidelines among gastroenterologists and for the implementation of ongoing training activities supported by scientific societies. Finally, it is desirable to follow IBD patients in specialized units, which would undoubtedly be associated with higher-quality healthcare and a lower likelihood of errors in managing these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier P. Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), 28006 Madrid, Spain;
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhdanava M, Kachroo S, Boonmak P, Burbage S, Shah A, Korsiak J, Lefebvre P, Kerner C, Pilon D. Real-World Treatment Persistence Among Advanced Therapy-Naïve or -Experienced Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Initiated on Ustekinumab or Adalimumab. Adv Ther 2024:10.1007/s12325-024-02942-6. [PMID: 39141283 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02942-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Persistence on advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) is a useful real-world treatment performance measure. This study compared real-world persistence during the maintenance phase among advanced therapy-naïve and -experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab. METHODS Claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015-06/30/2022) were used to select adult patients with UC treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab based on the agent first initiated (index date) after 10/21/2019. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance cohorts on baseline characteristics. Persistence on the index agent (no gaps in days of supply of > 120 days for ustekinumab or > 60 days for adalimumab), persistence while corticosteroid-free, while on monotherapy, and persistence on the US labeled dose were described and compared during the 12-month period post-index using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes were analyzed separately among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients. RESULTS At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-naïve patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 371) had higher persistence on the index agent [83.8% vs. 57.6%, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 3.09 (2.29-4.16); p < 0.001), persistence while corticosteroid-free [2.00 (1.63-2.45); p < 0.001], persistence while on monotherapy [2.67 (2.07-3.44); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.21 (2.76-6.44); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 1726). At 12 months post-index, advanced therapy-experienced patients receiving ustekinumab (n = 693) had higher persistence on the index agent [78.1% vs. 59.2%, 2.44 (1.82-3.26); p < 0.001], persistence while corticosteroid-free [1.24 (1.01-1.54); p = 0.0447], persistence while on monotherapy [2.53 (2.00-3.21); p < 0.001], and persistence on the labeled dose [4.77 (3.09-7.35); p < 0.001] versus those receiving adalimumab (n = 254). CONCLUSION This claims-based analysis demonstrated significantly higher treatment persistence, including persistence while corticosteroid-free, persistence while on monotherapy, and persistence on the labeled dose, among both advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with UC initiated on ustekinumab compared to adalimumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryia Zhdanava
- Analysis Group, Inc., 1190 Avenue Des Canadiens-de-Montréal, Suite 1500, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - Sumesh Kachroo
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson Company, 800 Ridgeview Drive, Horsham, PA, USA
| | - Porpong Boonmak
- Analysis Group, Inc., 1190 Avenue Des Canadiens-de-Montréal, Suite 1500, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sabree Burbage
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson Company, 800 Ridgeview Drive, Horsham, PA, USA
| | - Aditi Shah
- Analysis Group, Inc., 1190 Avenue Des Canadiens-de-Montréal, Suite 1500, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jill Korsiak
- Analysis Group, Inc., 1190 Avenue Des Canadiens-de-Montréal, Suite 1500, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Patrick Lefebvre
- Analysis Group, Inc., 1190 Avenue Des Canadiens-de-Montréal, Suite 1500, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Caroline Kerner
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson Company, 800 Ridgeview Drive, Horsham, PA, USA
| | - Dominic Pilon
- Analysis Group, Inc., 1190 Avenue Des Canadiens-de-Montréal, Suite 1500, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zeng Z, Lin H, Jiang M, Yuan J, Li X, Jia Y, Yang L, Zhang H. Anti-TNFα in inflammatory bowel disease: from originators to biosimilars. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1424606. [PMID: 39114362 PMCID: PMC11303209 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1424606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
The introduction of anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) biologics significantly innovated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment and increased medical costs. The recent expiration of patents of some anti-TNFα biologics (such as infliximab and adalimumab) facilitated the development of biosimilars. Comparable pharmacokinetic, efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity profiles between anti-TNFα originators and biosimilars were demonstrated in different studies. Anti-TNFα biosimilars hold promise for reducing the high cost of biologics and increasing patient access to biologics. In this review, we outline the current data on the use of anti-TNFα originators and biosimilars in patients with IBD, with a focus on the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity profiles of infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars. The potential benefits, challenges, and future directions of anti-TNFα biosimilars are also discussed in the review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Zeng
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Lab of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hao Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Lab of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mingshan Jiang
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Lab of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jing Yuan
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Lab of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xi Li
- Lab of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- General Practice Ward/International Medical Center Ward, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yongbin Jia
- Lab of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Li Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Lab of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Konikoff T, Loebl N, Yanai H, Libchik D, Kopylov U, Albshesh A, Weisshof R, Ghersin I, Bendersky AG, Avni-Biron I, Snir Y, Banai H, Broytman Y, Perl L, Dotan I, Ollech JE. Precision medicine: Externally validated explainable AI support tool for predicting sustainability of infliximab and vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis. Dig Liver Dis 2024:S1590-8658(24)00818-1. [PMID: 38960819 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 06/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Drug sustainability (DS), a surrogate marker for drug efficacy, is important, especially when aiming for precision medicine. However, it lacks reliable prediction methods. AIMS To develop and externally validate a web-based artificial intelligence(AI)-derived tool for predicting DS of infliximab and vedolizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC). METHODS Data from three Israeli centers included infliximab or vedolizumab patients treated for >54 weeks. Sustainability meant no corticosteroids, hospitalizations or surgeries. Machine learning techniques predicted >54-week and overall DS using baseline clinical data. RESULTS The model was developed using data from 246 patients from Rabin Medical Center and externally validated on 67 patients from Rambam Health Care Campus and Sheba Medical Center. No significant difference in DS was observed across the datasets. Most patients were biologic-naïve and primarily treated with vedolizumab. The model performed well, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.86, and showed good accuracy (65.5 %-76.9 %) across the test sets. CONCLUSIONS The study introduces a novel, AI-based tool for predicting >54-week DS of infliximab and vedolizumab in moderate-to-severe UC, using baseline parameters. This can aid clinical decision-making in the framework of precision medicine, promising to optimize disease management while maintaining physician autonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Konikoff
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nadav Loebl
- Rabin Medical Center Innovation Lab, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Henit Yanai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dror Libchik
- Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Uri Kopylov
- Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Division of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Ahmad Albshesh
- Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Division of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Roni Weisshof
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rambam Healthcare campus, Haifa, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Itai Ghersin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rambam Healthcare campus, Haifa, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ahinoam Glusman Bendersky
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Internal Medicine "D", Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Irit Avni-Biron
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yifat Snir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hagar Banai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yelena Broytman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Leor Perl
- Rabin Medical Center Innovation Lab, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Iris Dotan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jacob E Ollech
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel; Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Doherty J, Ryan AW, Quinn E, Conroy J, Dolan J, Corcoran R, Hara FO, Cullen G, Sheridan J, Bailey Y, Dunne C, Hartery K, McNamara D, Doherty GA, Kevans D. HLA-DQA1*05 Allele Carriage and Anti-TNF Therapy Persistence in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024:izae138. [PMID: 38937958 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izae138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Carriage of the HLA-DQA1*05 allele is associated with development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) to antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy in patients with Crohn's disease. However, ADA is not uniformly associated with treatment failure. We aimed to determine the impact of carriage of HLA-DQA1*05 allele on outcome of biologic therapy evaluated by drug persistence. METHODS A multicenter, retrospective study of 877 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti-TNF therapy with HLA-DQA1*05 genotypes were generated by imputation from whole genome sequence using the HIBAG package, in R. Primary end point was anti-TNF therapy persistence, (time to therapy failure), segregated by HLA-DQA1*05 allele genotype and development of a risk score to predict anti-TNF therapy failure, incorporating HLA-DQA1*05 allele genotype status (LORisk score). RESULTS In all, 877 patients receiving anti-TNF therapy were included in our study; 543 (62%) had no copy, 281 (32%) one copy, and 53 (6%) 2 copies of HLA-DQA1*05 allele. Mean time to anti-TNF therapy failure in patients with 2 copies of HLA-DQA1*05 allele was significantly shorter compared with patients with 0 or 1 copy at 700 days' follow-up: 418 vs 541 vs 513 days, respectively (P = .012). Factors independently associated with time to anti-TNF therapy failure included carriage of HLA-DQA1*05 allele (hazard ratio [HR], 1.2, P = .02; female gender HR, 1.6, P < .001; UC phenotype HR, 1.4, P = .009; and anti-TNF therapy type [infliximab], HR, 1.5, P = .002). The LORisk score was significantly associated with shorter time to anti-TNF therapy failure (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Carriage of 2 HLA-DQA1*05 alleles is associated with less favorable outcomes for patients receiving anti-TNF therapy with shorter time to therapy failure. HLA-DQA1*05 genotype status in conjunction with clinical factors may aid in therapy selection in patients with IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayne Doherty
- Gastroenterology Department, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- INITIative IBD Research Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Emma Quinn
- Genuity Science (Ireland) Limited, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Jackie Dolan
- Genuity Science (Ireland) Limited, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Roisin Corcoran
- Gastroenterology Department, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fintan O Hara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Garret Cullen
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland
- INITIative IBD Research Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Juliette Sheridan
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland
- INITIative IBD Research Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Yvonne Bailey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cara Dunne
- Gastroenterology Department, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Karen Hartery
- Gastroenterology Department, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deirdre McNamara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
- INITIative IBD Research Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Glen A Doherty
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland
- INITIative IBD Research Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David Kevans
- Gastroenterology Department, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
- Wellcome-HRB Clinical Research Facility, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- INITIative IBD Research Network, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dovizio M, Hartz S, Buzzoni C, Redondo I, Nedeljkovic Protic M, Birra D, Perrone V, Veronesi C, Degli Esposti L, Armuzzi A. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Use for Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease in Italy. Adv Ther 2024; 41:2282-2298. [PMID: 38619721 PMCID: PMC11133152 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02840-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Real-world data are used to inform decision-makers and optimise therapeutic management for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). We analysed data on the epidemiology (by using proxies of prevalence and incidence), patient characteristics, treatment patterns and associated healthcare direct costs for the management of patients with UC and patients with CD in Italy. METHODS This retrospective observational study used administrative databases from eight Local Health Units geographically distributed across Italy. Adult patients with a hospitalisation and/or an exemption for UC or CD were included. Study outcomes were summarised descriptively, and limited statistical tests were performed. RESULTS At baseline, 9255 adults with UC and 4747 adults with CD were included. Mean (standard deviation) age at inclusion was 54.0 (18.4)/48.6 (18.1) years, for UC/CD. The estimated average incidence of UC and CD for the period 2013-2020 was 36.5 and 18.7 per 100,000, respectively. The most frequently prescribed drug category for patients with UC/CD was conventional treatment [mesalazine and topical corticosteroids (67.4%/61.1%), immunomodulators and systemic corticosteroids (43.2%/47.7%)], followed by biologic treatments (2.1%/5.1%). The mean annual total direct cost per patient was 7678 euro (€), for UC and €6925 for CD. CONCLUSION This analysis, carried-out in an Italian clinical setting, may help to optimise therapy for patients with UC and CD and provide relevant clinical practice data to inform decision-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melania Dovizio
- CliCon S.R.L. Società Benefit Health, Economics and Outcomes Research, Via Murri, 9-40137, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Valentina Perrone
- CliCon S.R.L. Società Benefit Health, Economics and Outcomes Research, Via Murri, 9-40137, Bologna, Italy
| | - Chiara Veronesi
- CliCon S.R.L. Società Benefit Health, Economics and Outcomes Research, Via Murri, 9-40137, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Degli Esposti
- CliCon S.R.L. Società Benefit Health, Economics and Outcomes Research, Via Murri, 9-40137, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- IBD Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wetwittayakhlang P, Kotrri G, Bessissow T, Lakatos PL. How close are we to a success stratification tool for improving biological therapy in ulcerative colitis? Expert Opin Biol Ther 2024; 24:433-441. [PMID: 38903049 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2024.2371049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biological therapies have become the standard treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, clinical remission rates post-induction therapy remain modest at 40-50%, with many initial responders losing response over time. Current treatment strategies frequently rely on a 'trial and error' approach, leading to prolonged periods of ineffective and costly therapies for patients, accompanied by associated treatment complications. AREA COVERED This review discusses current evidence on risk stratification tools for predicting therapeutic efficacy and minimizing adverse events in UC management. Recent studies have identified predictive factors for biologic therapy response. In the context of personalized medicine, the goal is to identify patients at high risk of progression and complications, as well as those likely to respond to specific therapies. Essential risk stratification tools include clinical decision-making aids, biomarkers, genomics, multi-omics factors, endoscopic, imaging, and histological assessments. EXPERT OPINION Employing risk stratification tools to predict therapeutic response and prevent treatment-related complications is essential for precision medicine in the biological management of UC. These tools are necessary to select the most suitable treatment for each individual patient, thereby enhancing efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panu Wetwittayakhlang
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Gynter Kotrri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Talat Bessissow
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Peter L Lakatos
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Oncology and Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yiu TH, Ko Y, Pudipeddi A, Natale P, Leong RW. Meta-analysis: Persistence of advanced therapies in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2024; 59:1312-1334. [PMID: 38651771 DOI: 10.1111/apt.18006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2024] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The expanding options in advanced therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) present challenges in treatment selection. Persistence analysis assesses drug durability in real-world settings, acting as a surrogate marker for medication efficacy and tolerance. Unlike traditional comparative studies, persistence analysis provides insights extending beyond the initial year of treatment. AIM To provide real-world evidence on treatment effectiveness, tolerability and preferences of physicians and patients regarding various advanced therapies for IBD. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of observational studies up to March 2023 assessing advanced therapies' persistence in UC and CD. Advanced therapies under examination included infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, golimumab, certolizumab and tofacitinib. We pooled the persistence of each agent and conducted a meta-analysis to compare the persistence of newer agents with traditional TNF inhibitors (TNFi)-specifically infliximab and adalimumab. RESULTS Among 63 observational studies, vedolizumab had the highest 1-year persistence in UC (73.8%, 95% CI: 70.0%-77.6%) and ustekinumab in CD (77.5%, 95% CI: 72.9%-82.1%). Compared to TNFi, vedolizumab demonstrated increased persistence with a relative risk (RR) of 1.30 (95% CI: 1.19-1.41) for UC and 1.14 (95% CI: 1.09-1.20) for CD at 1 year, while ustekinumab demonstrated a RR of 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07-1.23) for CD at 1 year. Vedolizumab exhibited sustained increased persistence in UC over 2 years compared to TNFi (RR: 1.33, 95% CI 1.14-1.54). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis highlights the superior persistence of ustekinumab and vedolizumab over TNFi, and offers valuable insights for clinicians navigating the challenging landscape of UC and CD therapeutic choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsz Hong Yiu
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yanna Ko
- Campbelltown and Camden Hospitals, Canterbury Hospital, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Gastroenterology and Liver Services, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Aviv Pudipeddi
- Gastroenterology and Liver Services, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Patrizia Natale
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DIMEPRE-J), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Rupert W Leong
- Gastroenterology and Liver Services, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Salman A, Salman MA, Elewa A, Awwad AM. Efficacy and Safety of Infliximab Versus Adalimumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2024; 16:e61547. [PMID: 38835557 PMCID: PMC11148671 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory disorder affecting the colon, and typically, during the disease course, the condition may exacerbate, relapse, and remit. One of the most successful lines for inducing and maintaining clinical remission in subjects with UC is biological therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF) agents, including adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX). This meta-analysis is an attempt to obtain complementary information driven by real-world experience (RWE) concerning the efficacy and safety of two of the most popular anti-TNFs in treating UC. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of RWE studies comparing ADA and IFX as naïve anti-TNF agents for the treatment of subjects with UC. Studies were obtained by searching Scopus, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and the PubMed Central databases. Patients treated with IFX showed significantly higher induction responses. No statistically significant difference was found in the comparison of response in the maintenance treatment period. Higher overall adverse events were related to IFX treatment, with serious adverse events that were nonsignificantly higher in the ADA-treated group. In conclusion, IFX demonstrated significantly higher induction responses compared to ADA in patients with moderate-to-severe UC. IFX was associated with higher overall adverse events, whereas serious adverse events were non-significantly higher in the ADA-treated group. IFX may be favored as a first-line agent for its induction efficacy, and the choice between IFX and ADA should be individualized based on comprehensive clinical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Salman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, EGY
| | - Mohamed A Salman
- Department of Surgery, KasrAlAiny School of Medicine, Cairo, EGY
| | - Ahmed Elewa
- Department of General, Laparoscopic, and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgery, National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute, Cairo, EGY
| | - Asmaa M Awwad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, EGY
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Branco ABXC, Argolo W, Santos N, Hernandez G, Kakehasi A, Sobrado CW, Melsheimer R. ADHERENCE AND PERSISTENCE TO TREATMENT WITH INFLIXIMAB: ANALYSIS OF A PATIENT SUPPORT PROGRAM COHORT IN BRAZIL. ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2024; 61:e23149. [PMID: 38775584 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.24612023-149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monoclonal antibodies have proven efficacy in the management of several conditions and infliximab (IFX) is one of the most important drugs of the class. Some recent data have shown low rates of both persistence and adherence to several available biologics. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to describe adherence and persistence rate to IFX treatment and also persistence in the patient support program (PSP), among patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) or rheumatic diseases (RD) enrolled in the program of a large pharmaceutical company in Brazil. METHODS Retrospective observational analysis using the PSP database. IBD or RD patients using IFX enrolled on the PSP database between September 2015 and August 2019 were retrospectively evaluated to identify the persistence rate and adherence and followed up until March 1, 2020. Patients were excluded if treatment start date was prior to program entry; first infusion prior to September 1st, 2015 or after August 31st, 2019; the patients did not started treatment; and patients with "OTHERS" in "Indication" field. Persistence was assessed considering both persistence in the program ("PSP persistence") and persistence on IFX in the PSP ("IFX persistence in the PSP"). PSP persistence was defined as the proportion of patients remaining in the program at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after initiating IFX. To determine IFX persistence in the PSP, censoring was defined at the time the patient left the program, died, or was lost to follow-up. Adherence to treatment was measured by medication possession ratio ((MPR) - All days supply / elapsed days from first prescription to last day of medication possession)). Descriptive statistics were initially used. Kaplan-Meier curve, the median time estimated by the survival function, Cox regression model, and restricted mean survival time (RMST) were used to evaluate the treatment persistence time at 24 months and the logistic regression model was performed aiming to identify variables associated with adherence (MPR ≥80%). RESULTS A total of 10,233 patients were analyzed, 5,826 (56.9%) with the diagnosis of RD and 4,407 (43.1%) of IBD. At the end of the follow-up (median 9.1 months from PSP entry to the last infusion), persistence in the PSP was 65.6%, 48.2%, 31.0%, 20.7% and 13.1% at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months, respectively. Considering persistence on IFX in the PSP, estimates were 93.7%, 87.8%, 77.0%, 62.4% and 53.0% at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months, respectively. Variables associated with the risk of non-persistence were gender, country region and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Median MPR was 94.2%, while the percentage of patients with MPR ≥80% was 91.0%. Variables associated with MPR≥80% were country region and diagnosis of Crohn's disease. CONCLUSION Many patients leave the program without discontinuing IFX, since the 12-month persistence were very different between program and medication estimates, while high adherence rates were observed among patients enrolled in the PSP. Data highlights the benefits of a PSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Adriana Kakehasi
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ali S, Pasternak B, Moses J, Suskind DL, Samson C, Kaplan J, Creps J, Manning L, Baker M, Singer D, Patel P, Trombler B, Anandakrishnan A, Khorrami C, Feldman M, McGoldrick M, Adler J. Characterization of Biologic Discontinuation Among Pediatric Patients with Crohn's Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:S1542-3565(24)00406-3. [PMID: 38723980 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.03.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Biologic therapies may effectively treat Crohn's disease (CD), and pediatric patients who discontinue multiple biologics risk exhausting treatment options. The frequency and context of biologic discontinuation have not been well-characterized. We aimed to determine patterns of biologic use, discontinuation, and evaluation in pediatric patients with CD. METHODS Pediatric patients with CD at 7 U.S. centers (2010-2020) were identified. Prospective ImproveCareNow registry data were supplemented with medical record abstraction. Biologics included monoclonal antibody and small molecule medications. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was considered induction if <14 weeks after biologic start, proactive if later during quiescent disease, and reactive during active disease. RESULTS Of 823 patients included (median age, 13.0 years; 40% female), 86% started biologics (78% infliximab, 21% adalimumab, <1% others). Twenty-six percent used concomitant immunomodulators for ≥12 months. Most (85%) measured TDM including 47% induction, 69% proactive, and 24% reactive. Twenty-nine percent discontinued their first biologic after median 793 days because of inefficacy (34%), anti-drug antibodies (8%), adverse events (8%), or non-adherence (12%). If inefficacy, 86% underwent pre-discontinuation evaluation. If infliximab or adalimumab inefficacy and TDM was done, 62% had levels <10 μg/mL. Proactive TDM and concomitant immunomodulators were associated with 60% and 32% reduced biologic discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS Most children with CD are treated with biologics; 25%-37% discontinue biologics, resulting in 1 in 12 using >2 biologics during pediatric care. Half of patients discontinued biologics without trial of high-dose therapy and 14% without any evaluation. Concomitant immunomodulator use and proactive TDM decreased risk of biologic discontinuation. Strategies are needed to preserve biologic efficacy and prevent biologic discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Ali
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, Oakland, California
| | - Brad Pasternak
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Jonathan Moses
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, UH Rainbow Babies & Children's, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - David L Suskind
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | - Charles Samson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jess Kaplan
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Mass General for Children and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jana Creps
- Department of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Lauren Manning
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Michaella Baker
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Dianne Singer
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Perseus Patel
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, Oakland, California
| | - Becca Trombler
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Camila Khorrami
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | - Maya Feldman
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Mass General for Children and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Molly McGoldrick
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Mass General for Children and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeremy Adler
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhdanava M, Kachroo S, Shah A, Ding Z, Lefebvre P, Zhao R, Kerner C, Pilon D. Real-World Maintenance Phase Persistence on Ustekinumab and Adalimumab in Ulcerative Colitis. Patient Prefer Adherence 2024; 18:809-820. [PMID: 38617809 PMCID: PMC11016258 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s446861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To describe real-world persistence in bio-naïve and bio-experienced adults with ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with ustekinumab, a recently approved anti-interleukin 12/23 antibody, or adalimumab, an anti-TNF biologic. Methods This is a descriptive, retrospective cohort study. Patients initiating ustekinumab or adalimumab (index date, between 10/21/2019 and 08/13/2021) were selected from the Komodo Health comprehensive dataset and stratified into bio-naïve and bio-experienced subgroups based on biologic use 12 months pre-index date. Endpoints evaluated at 12-months after maintenance phase start using Kaplan-Meier analysis included 1) persistence; 2) persistence while being corticosteroid-free (<14 consecutive days of corticosteroid supply after day 90 post-index); and, 3) persistence while on monotherapy (no immunomodulators/non-index biologics/advanced therapies). Results Ustekinumab cohort included 778 patients (236 bio-naïve, 542 bio-experienced) and adalimumab cohort included 1693 patients (1517 bio-naive, 176 bio-experienced). At 12 months after maintenance phase start, 75.5% and 50.5% of bio-naïve patients persisted on ustekinumab and adalimumab and 72.3% and 56.9% of bio-experienced patients persisted on ustekinumab and adalimumab, respectively. Further, 55.1% and 38.2% of bio-naïve patients were persistent and corticosteroid-free with ustekinumab and adalimumab; 43.7% and 33.4% of bio-experienced patients were persistent and corticosteroid-free with ustekinumab and adalimumab, respectively. Moreover, 68.1% and 44.5% of bio-naïve patients were persistent and on monotherapy with ustekinumab and adalimumab; 61.6% and 47.9% of bio-experienced patients were persistent and on monotherapy with ustekinumab and adalimumab, respectively. Conclusion At 12 months after maintenance phase start, patients with UC treated with ustekinumab had numerically higher persistence, including persistence while corticosteroid-free and persistence while on monotherapy, than patients treated with adalimumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Aditi Shah
- Analysis Group, Inc, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Zhijie Ding
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
| | | | - Ruizhi Zhao
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Atia O, Friss C, Focht G, Magen Rimon R, Ledderman N, Greenfeld S, Ben-Tov A, Loewenberg Weisband Y, Matz E, Gorelik Y, Chowers Y, Dotan I, Turner D. Durability of the First Biologic in Children and Adults With Ulcerative Colitis: A Nationwide Study from the epi-IIRN. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024:izae067. [PMID: 38578929 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izae067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this nationwide study, our objective was to compare the durability of first-line biologics in ulcerative colitis (UC), categorized into monotherapy and combotherapy with immunomodulators. METHODS We utilized data from the nationwide epi-IIRN cohort from 2005 to 2020. Durability was defined as consistent treatment without surgery. Comparisons were based on stringent propensity score-matching. RESULTS We included 15 111 patients with UC, of whom 2322 (15%) received biologics, with a median follow-up of 7.0 years (interquartile range, 3.8-11.0). The durability rate was similar between pediatric-onset and adults after 1 and 5 years from initiation of treatment (72% and 43% vs 71% and 43%, respectively; P = .8). Durability of adalimumab vs infliximab after 1 or 5 years was similar, whether prescribed as monotherapy (65%/46% vs 63%/33%, respectively; n = 182 matched pairs, P = .3) or combotherapy (78%/56% vs 91%/58%, respectively; n = 46 matched pairs, P = .4). Durability of infliximab was higher as combotherapy (85%/50%) vs monotherapy (69%/42%; n = 174 matched pairs, P = .007), while it was similar for adalimumab (80%/52% vs 74%/52%; n = 53 matched pairs, P = .4). The durability rate was similar for vedolizumab monotherapy (77%/56%) compared with adalimumab monotherapy (69%/52%; n = 125 matched patients, P = .1), and infliximab monotherapy (73%/55% vs 62%/44%; n = 78 matched patients, P = .1). However, combotherapy of antitumor necrosis factors (TNFs) had longer durability than vedolizumab (85%/50% vs 75%/43%, respectively; n = 131 matched pairs, P = .02). CONCLUSION After 5 years of treatment, 43% of the patients with UC sustained their first biologic, with similar durability in pediatric and adult-onset onset disease. Anti-TNFs had similar durability to vedolizumab and superior durability when prescribed as combotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ohad Atia
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Chagit Friss
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Gili Focht
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ramit Magen Rimon
- Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition Institute, Ruth Rappaport Children's Hospital, Rambam Health Care Campus and the Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | | | - Shira Greenfeld
- Kahn-Sagol-Maccabi Research and Innovation Center, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Amir Ben-Tov
- Kahn-Sagol-Maccabi Research and Innovation Center, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Eran Matz
- Leumit Health Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Yuri Gorelik
- Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology and the Gastroenterology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Yehuda Chowers
- Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology and the Gastroenterology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Iris Dotan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel and the Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dan Turner
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wetwittayakhlang P, Bessissow T, Lakatos PL. Novel and emerging drugs for the treatment of Crohn's disease: a review of phase II and III trials. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2024; 29:19-34. [PMID: 38193191 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2024.2303116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by unpredictable flare-ups and periods of remission. While several therapeutic options, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF), anti-integrin, and interleukin (IL) 12/23 inhibitors, as well as IL-23 and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, have been approved for CD treatment, a substantial number of patients fail to respond adequately or experience a loss of response over time. In recent years, the scientific community has been actively investigating novel agents to address these challenges and improve the management of CD. AREAS COVERED This comprehensive narrative review provides an overview of recent developments in CD treatment, summarizing phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data. We delve into the clinical efficacy and safety profiles of emerging therapies, encompassing JAK inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, anti-adhesion molecules, S1P1 receptor modulators, and combined targeted treatments. EXPERT OPINION The armamentarium of CD therapeutic agents is constantly expanding. We analyze pivotal findings from phase 2 and phase 3 CD treatment trials. We also underscore the existing gaps in therapy and the paramount role of ongoing research and innovation in CD management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panu Wetwittayakhlang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Talat Bessissow
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Peter L Lakatos
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Oncology and Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Parra V, Cifuentes S, Avendaño S, Ponce de León E, Florez C, Reyes G, Puentes F, Ballesteros M, Nuñez E, Gómez F, Márquez JR. Real-world experience of vedolizumab use in Colombian patients with inflammatory bowel disease-EXVEDOCOL. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2024:S0210-5705(24)00025-6. [PMID: 38311006 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-world studies about the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Latin America are scarce. Our study describes the effectiveness and safety of VDZ in Colombian patients with IBD. METHODS EXVEDOCOL (EXperience of VEDOlizumab in COLombia) was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. Adults with IBD receiving a first dose of VDZ between July 2016 and October 2018 were included. The co-primary outcomes clinical response, and remission, were determined at week 14 and last visit during the maintenance phase (LVMP). The secondary outcomes, deep remission and loss of response were recorded at LVMP. RESULTS Thirty-one patients (25 ulcerative colitis (UC), 6 Crohn's disease (CD)) were included. At week 14, clinical response was achieved by 87.1% (27/31) of the patients treated with VDZ, while loss of response was reported in 6.7% (2/30). The remission rate at week 14 was 65.5% (19/29) and 75.9% (22/29) at LVMP. Prior anti-TNF exposure was reported in 61.3% (19 patients) of whom 84.2% (16/19) achieved clinical response at week 14 and 89.5% (17/19) at LVMP. For anti-TNF naïve patients, clinical response was recorded in 91.7% (11/12) at week 14 and 100% (12/12) at LVMP. CONCLUSIONS High clinical remission rates and safety profile highlight VDZ as a valuable treatment option for IBD patients. Anti-TNF naïve patients may derive greater benefit from therapy. Studies with larger cohorts could confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viviana Parra
- Gastroadvanced, Bogotá, Hospital Internacional de Colombia, Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | | | | | | | - Cristian Florez
- Gastroadvanced, Bogotá, Hospital Internacional de Colombia, Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Atia O, Friss C, Focht G, Magen Rimon R, Ledderman N, Greenfeld S, Ben-Tov A, Loewenberg Weisband Y, Matz E, Gorelik Y, Chowers Y, Dotan I, Turner D. Durability of the First Biologic in Patients with Crohn's Disease: A Nationwide Study from the epi-IIRN. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:38-46. [PMID: 37465992 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this nationwide study we aimed to compare the durability of the first initiated biologic in Crohn's disease [CD], stratified by monotherapy and combotherapy. METHODS We used data from the epi-IIRN cohort, which includes 98% of the Israeli inflammatory bowel disease population [2005-2020]. Durability was defined as consistent treatment without surgery or added medications [except for combination therapy with thiopurines or methotrexate]. All comparisons were based on stringent propensity-score matching and paired time-to-event analyses. RESULTS A total of 19 264 patients with CD were included, of whom 7452 [39%] received biologics with a median follow-up of 6.8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3.6-10.7). Time to biologics decreased gradually from 6.7 years [IQR 2.7-10.4] in 2005 to 0.2 years [0.07-0.23] in 2020. The durability of the first biologic after 1 and 3 years was higher with adalimumab monotherapy [88%/61%] than vedolizumab monotherapy [81%/59%; n = 394 matched patients, p = 0.04] and similar between infliximab monotherapy and vedolizumab monotherapy [65%/43%; n = 182 matched patients, p = 0.1]. Durability was higher in adalimumab monotherapy vs infliximab monotherapy [83%/62% vs 71%/48% at 1/3 years; p <0.001] and it was similar in adalimumab monotherapy vs infliximab combotherapy [87%/63% vs 80%/58%, respectively; p = 0.1]. Durability was higher in combotherapy compared with monotherapy for both infliximab [85%/64% vs 67%/43%, respectively; n = 496 matched pairs, p <0.001], and adalimumab [93%/76% vs 82%/62%, respectively; n = 540 matched pairs, p <0.001]. CONCLUSION Durability of the first biologic in CD was highest for adalimumab monotherapy. Combotherapy further increased the durability of adalimumab and infliximab. Unless otherwise indicated, our data may support using anti-tumour necrosis factors [TNFs] as first-line biologics in CD, particularly adalimumab if monotherapy is advised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ohad Atia
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Chagit Friss
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Gili Focht
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ramit Magen Rimon
- Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition Institute, Ruth Rappaport Children's Hospital, Rambam Health Care Campus and the Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | | | - Shira Greenfeld
- Kahn-Sagol-Maccabi Research and Innovation Center, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Amir Ben-Tov
- Kahn-Sagol-Maccabi Research and Innovation Center, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Eran Matz
- Leumit Health Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Yuri Gorelik
- Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology and the Gastroenterology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Yehuda Chowers
- Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology and the Gastroenterology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Iris Dotan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dan Turner
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fernández-Cano MC, Fernández-Cano AJ, Martín-Rodríguez MM, Sánchez-Capilla AD, Cabello-Tapia MJ, Redondo-Cerezo E. Adalimumab Persistence and Its Biosimilar in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Real-World Study. J Clin Med 2024; 13:556. [PMID: 38256689 PMCID: PMC10816059 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Adalimumab biosimilar experience is still recent. Interchangeability differences could reduce persistence times. Our goal was to compare biosimilar persistence differences with a reference. A retrospective observational study was performed in three groups divided according to the adalimumab received. The primary outcome measure was persistence, represented with Kaplan-Meier analysis, and we secondarily evaluated security, efficacy, and biomarkers. We obtained approval from the regional ethical committee, and the study was conducted following the Helsinki Declaration as revised in 2013. Data from 104 patients were collected: 50 received the biosimilar, 29 received the reference, and 25 switched from the original to the biosimilar. After a follow-up of 12 months, the biosimilar's persistence was higher, without differences in mild adverse events per group. In contrast, there were differences in severe events, with the switched group's frequency being higher. Biomarkers were reduced at similar proportions in all groups, and 43% had a clinical response at week 20 without differences. Adalimumab biosimilars are a valuable option for IBD based on clinical equivalence that are less expensive than the original drug. Their use does not have a detrimental influence on disease, although there are a few nuances in terms of interchangeability. These results support increasing confidence in using biosimilars, thus promoting the better sustainability of health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Carmen Fernández-Cano
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, 18014 Granada, Spain
- Doctoral Programme in Clinical Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, 18012 Granada, Spain
| | - Antonio Jesús Fernández-Cano
- Citizen Innovation Department, Consortium for Developing the Information and Knowledge Society in Andalusia “Fernando de los Ríos”, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | | | | | - María José Cabello-Tapia
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, 18014 Granada, Spain
| | - Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, 18014 Granada, Spain
- Doctoral Programme in Clinical Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, 18012 Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
McDonald GB, Landsverk OJ, McGovern DP, Aasebø A, Paulsen V, Haritunians T, Reims HM, McLaughlin BM, Zisman T, Li D, Elholm ET, Jahnsen FL, Georges GE, Gedde-Dahl T. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for patients with treatment-refractory Crohn's Disease. Heliyon 2024; 10:e24026. [PMID: 38283244 PMCID: PMC10818189 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background & aims Durable remissions of Crohn's Disease (CD) have followed myeloablative conditioning therapy and allogeneic marrow transplantation. For patients with treatment-refractory disease, we used reduced-intensity conditioning to minimize toxicity, marrow from donors with low Polygenic Risk Scores for CD as cell sources, and protracted immune suppression to lower the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Our aim was to achieve durable CD remissions while minimizing transplant-related complications. Methods DNA from patients and their HLA-matched unrelated donors was genotyped and Polygenic Risk Scores calculated. Donor marrow was infused following non-myeloablative conditioning. Patient symptoms and endoscopic findings were documented at intervals after transplant. Results We screened 807 patients, 143 of whom met eligibility criteria; 2 patients received allografts. Patient 1 had multiple complications and died at day 332 from respiratory failure. Patient 2 had resolution of CD symptoms until day 178 when CD recurred, associated with persistent host chimerism in both peripheral blood and intestinal mucosa. Withdrawal of immune suppression was followed by dominant donor immune chimerism in peripheral blood and resolution of CD findings. Over time, mucosal T-cells became donor-dominant. At 5 years after allografting, Patient 2 remained off all medications but had mild symptoms related to a jejunal stricture that required stricturoplasty at 6 years. At 8 years, she remains stable off medications. Conclusions The kinetics of immunologic chimerism after allogeneic marrow transplantation for CD patients depends on the intensity of the conditioning regimen and the magnitude of immune suppression. One patient achieved durable improvement of her previously refractory CD only after establishing donor immunologic chimerism in intestinal mucosa. Her course provides proof-of-principal for allografting as a potential treatment for refractory CD, but an immunoablative conditioning regimen should be considered for future studies.(ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01570348).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George B. McDonald
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Dermot P.B. McGovern
- F. Widjaja Foundation Inflammatory Bowel & Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anders Aasebø
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vemund Paulsen
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Norway
| | - Talin Haritunians
- F. Widjaja Foundation Inflammatory Bowel & Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Henrik M. Reims
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Timothy Zisman
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Dalin Li
- F. Widjaja Foundation Inflammatory Bowel & Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elisabeth T.M.M. Elholm
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Frode L. Jahnsen
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - George E. Georges
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tobias Gedde-Dahl
- Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jin R, Kruppert S, Scholz F, Bardoulat I, Karzazi K, Kricorian G, O’Kelly JL, Reinisch W. Treatment persistence and switching patterns of ABP 501 in European patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2024; 17:17562848231222332. [PMID: 38221908 PMCID: PMC10787526 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231222332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Approval of the adalimumab (ADA) biosimilar ABP 501 for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) indications was based on the principle of extrapolation, without indication-specific clinical trial data. Objectives To evaluate the real-world treatment patterns of ABP 501 in patients with IBD. Design Retrospective analysis of pharmacy claims data from Germany and France. Methods Continuously insured adult IBD patients who initiated ABP 501 between October 2018 and March 2020 were included. Treatment persistence, adherence, and post-ABP 501 switching patterns were evaluated for two mutually exclusive groups: ADA-naïve patients (i.e. no baseline use of ADA products) and ADA-experienced patients (i.e. previously treated with ADA products). Results A total of 3362 German patients and 733 French patients were included, with 54.4% and 65.3% being ADA-naïve patients, respectively. Median persistence (95% CI) on ABP 501 was 10.9 months (9.8-11.6) in ADA-naïve patients and 14.2 months (12.7-15.2) in ADA-experienced patients in Germany; for the French cohort, ADA-naïve and -experienced patients had median persistence of 12.8 months (10.2-14.7) and 11.5 months (8.8-14.4), respectively. During the first 12 months of ABP 501 initiation, 53.7% of German patients and 51.0% of French patients were adherent to the therapy. About 20% of patients in both countries switched from ABP 501 to another targeted therapy. In the German cohort, ADA-naïve patients most frequently switched to non-tumor necrosis factor inhibitor biologics, but ADA-experienced patients most commonly switched to reference product (RP); in the French cohort, patients most often switched to RP regardless of prior exposure to ADA products. Conclusion About 50% of patients persisted on and were adherent to ABP 501 therapy during the first 12 months after treatment initiation in two large European countries. Post-ABP 501, switching patterns varied between countries, indicating diversified treatment practices warranting further research on reason(s) for switching and potential overall treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Jin
- Amgen Inc., 1 Amgen Center Dr, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Walter Reinisch
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lemmens P, Louis E, Van Moerkercke W, Pouillon L, Somers M, Peeters H, Vanden Branden S, Busschaert J, Baert F, Cremer A, Potvin P, Dewit S, Colard A, Swinnen J, Lambrecht G, Claessens C, Willandt B, Dewint P, Van Dyck E, Sabino J, Vermeire S, Ferrante M. Outcome of Biological Therapies and Small Molecules in Ulcerative Proctitis: A Belgian Multicenter Cohort Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22:154-163.e3. [PMID: 37442318 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Several advanced therapies (biologic therapies and small molecules) have been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. The registration trials for these agents typically excluded patients with isolated proctitis, leaving an evidence gap. We evaluated efficacy and safety of advanced therapies in patients with ulcerative proctitis (UP). METHODS This multicenter retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with active UP (Mayo endoscopy subscore of ≥2, rectal inflammation up to 15 cm) initiating advanced therapy, after failing conventional therapy. The primary end point was short-term steroid-free clinical remission (total Mayo score ≤2 with no individual subscore >1). In addition, drug persistence and relapse-free and colectomy-free survival were assessed. Both binary logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS In total, 167 consecutive patients (52.0% female; median age 41.0 years; 82.0% bionaive) underwent 223 courses of therapy for UP (38 adalimumab, 14 golimumab, 54 infliximab, 9 ustekinumab, 99 vedolizumab, 9 tofacitinib). The primary end point was achieved with 36.3% of the treatment courses, and based on multivariate analysis, more commonly attained in bionaive patients (P = .001), patients treated with vedolizumab (P = .001), patients with moderate endoscopic disease activity (P = .002), and a body mass index <25 kg/m2 (P = .018). Drug persistence was significantly higher in patients treated with vedolizumab (P < .001) and patients with a shorter disease duration (P = .006). No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS Advanced therapies are also efficacious and safe in patients with ulcerative colitis limited to the rectum. Therefore, the inclusion of patients with UP in future randomized-controlled trials should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Lemmens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Edouard Louis
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Liege and Liege University, Liege, Belgium
| | | | - Lieven Pouillon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Michael Somers
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Harald Peeters
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | | | | | - Filip Baert
- Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium
| | - Anneline Cremer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Philippe Potvin
- Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Rivierenland, Bornem, Belgium
| | - Sophie Dewit
- Department of Gastroenterology, Noorderhart Maria Hospital, Pelt, Belgium
| | - Arnaud Colard
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Chrétien - Clinique St Joseph, Liege, Belgium
| | - Jo Swinnen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sint Franciscus Hospital, Heusden-Zolder, Belgium
| | - Guy Lambrecht
- Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Damiaan, Oostende, Belgium
| | | | | | - Pieter Dewint
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Maria Middelares, Gent, Belgium
| | - Evi Van Dyck
- Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium
| | - Joao Sabino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marc Ferrante
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gagnon-Sanschagrin P, Sanon M, Davidson M, Willey C, Kachroo S, Hoops T, Naessens D, Guerin A, Cloutier M. The economic impact of suboptimal treatment and treatment switch among patients with Crohn's disease treated with a first-line biologic - A US retrospective claims database study. J Med Econ 2024; 27:931-940. [PMID: 38965985 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2374645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Suboptimal treatment indicators, including treatment switch, are common among patients with Crohn's disease (CD), but little is known about their associated healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs. This study assessed the impact of suboptimal treatment indicators on HRU and costs among adults with CD newly treated with a first-line biologic. METHODS Adult patients with CD were identified in the IBM MarketScan Commercial Subset (10/01/2015-03/31/2020). The index date was defined as initiation of the first-line biologic, and the study period was defined as the 12 months following the index date. Patients were classified into Suboptimal Treatment and Optimal Treatment cohorts based on observed indicators of suboptimal treatment during the study period. Patients in the Suboptimal Treatment Cohort with a treatment switch were classified into the Treatment Switch Cohort and compared to patients with no treatment switch. All-cause HRU and costs were measured during the study period and assessed for patients with suboptimal vs optimal treatment and patients with vs without a treatment switch. RESULTS The study included 4,006 patients (Suboptimal Treatment: 2,091, Optimal Treatment: 1,915). Treatment switch was a common indicator of suboptimal treatment (Treatment Switch: 640, No Treatment Switch: 3,366). HRU and costs were significantly higher among patients with suboptimal treatment than those with optimal treatment (annual costs: $92,043 vs $73,764; p < 0.01), and among those with a treatment switch than those with no treatment switch (annual costs: $95,689 vs $81,027; p < 0.01). Increases in the number of suboptimal treatment indicators were associated with increased costs. LIMITATIONS Claims data were used to identify suboptimal treatment indicators based on observed treatment patterns; reasons for treatment decisions could not be assessed. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that patients with suboptimal treatment indicators, including treatment switch, incur substantially higher HRU and costs compared to patients receiving optimal treatment and those that do not switch treatments.
Collapse
|
23
|
Dignass A, Redondo I, Streit P, Hartz S, Gurses G, Knight H, Barlow S, Harvey N, Hunter T. Clinical profiles and outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving standard and escalated doses of targeted therapies: findings from a global real-world study. Curr Med Res Opin 2023; 39:1695-1705. [PMID: 37927078 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2278695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although dosing regimens of targeted therapies (TT) for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are guided by market authorizations and clinical guidelines, little is known about clinical guideline adherence or outcomes in patients receiving escalated doses of TT due to lack of response. This real-world study explored the prevalence of dose escalation and compared outcomes between patients receiving standard and escalated TT doses. METHODS Data were from the 2020-2021 Adelphi Disease Specific Programme for inflammatory bowel disease, a cross-sectional survey of gastroenterologists and their UC and CD patients across five European countries and the US. Physicians provided retrospective data collection of patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment history, and satisfaction; patients reported quality-of-life and work productivity. Patients were grouped by TT maintenance dose; standard and escalated dose groups were compared. Outcomes were adjusted for time on current TT and severity at current TT initiation using regression analyses. RESULTS Of 1,241 UC and 1,477 CD patients, 19.1% and 24.1%, respectively, received escalated TT doses. Despite escalation, a substantial proportion of patients had not achieved remission, had moderate or severe disease activity, or were flaring. Most physicians were not fully satisfied with treatment in the escalated dose group and were more likely to switch patients to another treatment regimen than patients on standard dose. CONCLUSION Dose escalation is not always an effective approach to resolve inadequate or loss of response in UC and CD, highlighting a need for more therapeutic options or alternative treatment strategies in patients unresponsive to TT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Dignass
- Department of Medicine I, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bai M, Guo H, Zheng XY. Inflammatory bowel disease and Clostridium difficile infection: clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848231207280. [PMID: 38034098 PMCID: PMC10685799 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231207280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
As a frequent complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) was confirmed to not only aggravate the symptoms of IBD but also result in unexpected outcomes, including death. With the increasing prevalence rate of IBD and the updating of CDI diagnosis, the incidence of CDI in IBD patients is also seen rising. Although a detection method consisting of glutamate dehydrogenase immunoassay or nucleic acid amplification test and then toxin A/B enzyme immunoassay was recommended and widely adopted, the diagnosis of CDI in IBD is still a challenge because of the overlap between the symptoms of CDI in IBD and CDI itself. Vancomycin and fidaxomicin are the first-line therapy for CDI in IBD; however, the treatment has different effects due to the complexity of IBD patients' conditions and the choice of different treatment schemes. Although the use of fecal microbial transplantation is now in the ascendant for IBD management, the prospects are still uncertain and the prevention and treatment of the recurrence of CDI in IBD remain a clinical challenge. In this paper, the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestation, prevention, and therapy of CDI in IBD were summarized and presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Bai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Hong Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing General Hospital, 28 Jinshan Avenue, Yubei District, Chongqing 401147, China
| | - Xiao-Yao Zheng
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhao R, Ding Z, Gupta P, Gozalo L, Bruette R, Johnson VM, Maughn K, Liu Y, Kachroo S. Evaluation of Treatment Patterns and Maintenance Dose Titration Among Patients With Crohn's Disease Initiating Biologics With 3 Years of Follow-Up. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 10:111-120. [PMID: 38025989 PMCID: PMC10664831 DOI: 10.36469/001c.88947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Background: There is limited real-world evidence on treatment patterns of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) initiating biologics with an extensive follow-up period. This study describes persistence and dose titration among CD patients with 3 years of follow-up. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted using the STATinMED RWD Insights all-payer medical and pharmacy data. Adult patients with at least 1 CD medical claim and at least 1 medical/pharmacy claim for a biologic (adalimumab [ADA], certolizumab pegol (CZP), infliximab [IFX] and its biosimilar products [IFX-BS], ustekinumab [UST], and vedolizumab [VDZ]) between September 2016 and October 2018 were identified. Commercially insured patients with continuous capture for at least 12 months before and at least 36 months after biologics initiation were selected. Confirmed CD patients were included in the final cohort. Baseline patient characteristics and treatment patterns over the 3-year follow-up period were evaluated. Results were summarized using means and SD or counts and percentages. Results: A total of 2309 confirmed patients with CD were identified (847 [36.7%] IFX, 534 [23.1%] ADA, 486 [21.1%] VDZ, 394 [17.1%] UST, 85 [3.7%] CZP, and 72 [3.1%] IFX-BS). CZP and IFX-BS were excluded due to small sample sizes. Approximately half of CD patients were between ages 35 and 54. Patients on UST had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score. Common comorbidities (>10%) included anemia, anxiety, depression, and hypertension. Persistence over 3 years' follow-up was highest for UST (61.4%) patients, followed by VDZ (58.0% ), ADA (52.1% , and IFX (48.1%). The discontinuation rate without switch or restart was highest for ADA (37.3%), followed by UST (30.7%), IFX (28.1%), and VDZ (25.3%). Over the 3 years of follow-up, the dose titration rate was highest for IFX (76.5%) and lowest for UST (50.8%). In particular, UST had the lowest dose escalation rate (35.5%) and highest dose-reduction rate (16.5%). Conclusions: Patients with CD on UST had the highest persistence and lowest dose escalation across different biologic users over the 3-year follow-up period, possibly suggesting a better clinical response of UST. Future studies with longer follow-up adjusting for confounders are needed to better understand treatment patterns among biologics users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruizhi Zhao
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, Pennsylvania
| | - Zhijie Ding
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Krugliak Cleveland N, Ghosh S, Chastek B, Bancroft T, Candela N, Fan T, Umashankar K, Rubin DT. Real-World Persistence of Successive Biologics in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Findings From ROTARY. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023:izad245. [PMID: 37921344 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may receive multiple successive biologic treatments in clinical practice; however, data are limited on the comparative effectiveness of biologics and the impact of treatment sequence on outcomes. METHODS The ROTARY (Real wOrld ouTcomes Across tReatment sequences in inflammatorY bowel disease patients) study was a retrospective, observational cohort study conducted using data from the Optum Clinical Database between January 1, 2012, and February 29, 2020. Adult patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who received 2 biologics successively were included. Biologic treatment sequences were analyzed descriptively. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, were used to estimate the hazard ratio of switching or discontinuation for each first- and second-line biologic compared with first- and second-line adalimumab, respectively. RESULTS In total, 4648 patients with IBD (CD, n = 3008; UC, n = 1640) were identified. Most patients received tumor necrosis factor α antagonist (anti-TNFα) treatment followed by another anti-TNFα treatment or vedolizumab. Vedolizumab and infliximab had 39.4% and 34.6% lower rates of switching or discontinuation than adalimumab, respectively, as first-line biologics in patients with CD and 30.8% and 34.3% lower rates as first-line biologics in patients with UC, respectively. Vedolizumab, infliximab, and ustekinumab had 47.2%, 40.0%, and 43.5% lower rates of switching or discontinuation than adalimumab, respectively, as second-line biologics in CD and 56.5%, 43.0%, and 45.6% lower rates as second-line biologics in patients with UC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although anti-TNFα treatments were most commonly prescribed, the adjusted rates of discontinuation for adalimumab as both a first- and second-line biologic were higher than for vedolizumab, infliximab, or ustekinumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Tao Fan
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc, Lexington, MA, USA
| | | | - David T Rubin
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bressler B, Jones J, In TSH, Lan T, Iconaru C, Marshall JK. Real-World Persistence of Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Adv Ther 2023; 40:4421-4439. [PMID: 37507652 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02611-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is an urgent need to understand the long-term real-world effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) in the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD), fistulizing CD (FCD), and ulcerative colitis (UC). Persistence on treatment is commonly used as a surrogate measure of real-world treatment response. This study aims to estimate the long-term real-world persistence of UST in adult patients with CD, FCD, and UC. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted in patients with CD, FCD, and UC treated with UST through a national patient support program in Canada. Treatment persistence was described using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the impact of patient characteristics on persistence was explored through stratified analyses and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Persistence rates for 8724 patients with CD were 82.9%, 71.4%, 64.1%, and 59.7% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. Similarly, persistence rates for 276 patients with FCD were 84.1%, 70.9%, 64.9%, and 63.1% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. Persistence rates for 1291 patients with UC were 76.5% at 1 year and 69.5% at 1.5 years. When stratified by prior IBD-indicated biologic experience, persistence was numerically higher in biologic-naïve patients across all disease cohorts. A Cox proportional hazards model confirmed that this difference was significant in patients with CD (hazard ratio: 0.72; confidence interval: [0.65-0.79]). CONCLUSIONS This study estimated long-term persistence in a large population of patients with IBD. At 1 year, over three-fourths of patients remained on UST treatment in all disease cohorts, and over half of patients remained on treatment at 4 years in CD and FCD patients. Biologic-naïve status was significantly associated with higher persistence in patients with CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Bressler
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jennifer Jones
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | | | - Tommy Lan
- IQVIA Solutions Canada Inc., Kirkland, Québec, Canada
| | | | - John K Marshall
- Department of Medicine and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West (Room 2F59), Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Goss Sawhney T, Dobes A, O’Charoen S. Real-World Persistency for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Biologics Using Patient Registry Data. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2023; 5:otad051. [PMID: 37941597 PMCID: PMC10629214 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otad051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although it is a truism that drugs benefit patients only when taken, surprisingly little is known about real-world drug-use persistence and discontinuation, even for expensive biologic drugs. Methods We used longitudinal self-reported drug-use data from the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Partners registry of people with IBD to construct Kaplan-Meier drug-use persistency graphs for biologic drug-use spans that started between 2017 and 2022. Results We examined 2034 drug-use spans for 1594 survey participants. Most of the biologic drugs had a 75%+ persistency rate around the one-year mark and 60%+ persistency at the 3-year mark. The overall persistency and the differences in persistency between drugs were aligned with published literature. Conclusions This analysis demonstrates the feasibility of collecting IBD-specific patient-reported drug persistency data via a voluntary patient registry. Patient-reported persistency provides real-world drug persistency data and the patient's perspectives as to why they discontinued use of the drug-a combination of data and perspective that is not available from any other real-world medical record, claim, and pharmacy data source that are valuable to physician, patients, payers, healthcare policymakers, and health technology assessment organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tia Goss Sawhney
- Teus Health, LLC, Newark, NJ, USA
- New York University, School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Koo HM, Jun YK, Choi Y, Shin CM, Park YS, Kim N, Lee DH, Shin YK, Yoon H. 10 years of biologic use patterns in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: treatment persistence, switching and dose intensification - a nationwide population-based study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848231201728. [PMID: 37786473 PMCID: PMC10541745 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231201728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Treatments for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have evolved in the era of biologics. However, the real-world data on their usage patterns and sequencing are still limited. Objectives We aimed to investigate treatment persistence and dose intensification of first- and second-line biologics in patients with IBD. Design In this retrospective, cohort study using nationwide claims data, 13,087 patients with IBD initiating biologic therapy between 2010 and 2020 were identified. Methods Treatment persistence and dose intensification during the first 2 years and switching patterns of biologics were analysed while identifying predictors of non-persistence. Results As a first-line treatment of Crohn's disease (CD), ustekinumab had a lower risk for non-persistence compared to infliximab [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.69, p = 0.048]. Second-line ustekinumab and vedolizumab showed the highest and lowest persistence (79.2% and 54.9%), respectively. As a first-line treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), golimumab had a higher risk for non-persistence compared to infliximab (aHR, 1.68, p < 0.001). Second-line golimumab also showed a significantly lower persistence rate than adalimumab and vedolizumab. The risk of non-persistence was higher in UC than in CD (first line: aHR, 1.97; second line: aHR, 1.39; p < 0.001), and in the second-line treatment than in the first-line treatment for CD (aHR, 1.55; p < 0.001). The cumulative rate of dose intensification was highest with ustekinumab for CD (first line, 43.3%, second line, 69.1%) and adalimumab for second-line UC (40.7%). It was significantly increased in second-line therapy in CD, but not in UC. Among switchers of first-line anti-tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapy, after all biologics were approved, 69% of CD patients and 78.4% of UC patients switched to other classes of second-line treatment. Conclusion Ustekinumab had higher persistence in the first-line treatment of CD, while golimumab had lower persistence for first- and second-line treatments of UC. Dose intensification rates varied, with the highest cumulative rates observed for ustekinumab in CD and adalimumab in second-line UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee Moon Koo
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yu Kyung Jun
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yonghoon Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Cheol Min Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Young Soo Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Nayoung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dong Ho Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Young Kee Shin
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyuk Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do 13620, South Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhdanava M, Ding Z, Manceur AM, Zhao R, Holiday C, Kachroo S, Izanec J, Pilon D. Long-term persistence and other treatment patterns among bio-naïve patients with Crohn's disease treated with ustekinumab or adalimumab. Curr Med Res Opin 2023; 39:1215-1225. [PMID: 37563994 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2246882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate long-term persistence among bio-naïve patients with CD initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab. METHODS Adults with CD initiating ustekinumab or adalimumab (index date, between September 23, 2016 and August 1, 2019) were sampled from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database. Patients without CD-indicated biologics (bio-naïve) and with no diagnoses for other autoimmune diseases 12 months pre-index date (baseline) were included. Cohorts were balanced on baseline characteristics with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Persistence was defined as the absence of therapy exposure gaps >120 days (ustekinumab) or >60 (adalimumab) between days of supply. Composite endpoints were persistence and being corticosteroid-free (no corticosteroids >14 days of supply after day 90 post-index) and persistence while on monotherapy (no immunomodulators/non-index biologics). Persistence was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox's models. RESULTS Ustekinumab and adalimumab cohorts included 671 and 2,975 patients. At 12 months post-index, ustekinumab patients were significantly more persistent (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.33-1.93), persistent while on monotherapy (HR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.24-1.65), and trended toward being more persistent and corticosteroid-free (HR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.99-1.30) vs adalimumab. At 24 months post-index, ustekinumab patients were significantly more persistent (HR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.40-1.97), persistent while on monotherapy (HR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.26-1.64), and persistent and corticosteroid-free (HR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.01-1.31) vs adalimumab. CONCLUSIONS Bio-naïve patients with CD initiated on ustekinumab demonstrated significantly more persistence than patients initiated on adalimumab at 12 and 24 months of treatment. Long-term persistence is a measure of a drug's real-world performance and findings may aid clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zhijie Ding
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
| | | | - Ruizhi Zhao
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
| | | | | | - James Izanec
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Degli Esposti L, Daperno M, Dovizio M, Franchi A, Sangiorgi D, Savarino EV, Scaldaferri F, Secchi O, Serra A, Perrone V, Armuzzi A. A retrospective analysis of treatment patterns, drug discontinuation and healthcare costs in Crohn's disease patients treated with biologics. Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:1214-1220. [PMID: 37100708 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS This real-world analysis evaluated the persistence and direct healthcare costs of Crohn's Disease (CD) patients treated with biologics in Italy. METHODS A retrospective analysis on administrative databases of Italian healthcare entities, covering 10.4 million residents, was performed. Adult CD patients under biologics between 2015 and 2020 were included and attributed to first/second treatment line based on absence/presence of biologic prescriptions 5-years before index-date (first biologic prescription). RESULTS Of 16,374 CD patients identified, 1,398 (8.5%) were biologic-treated: 1,256 (89.8%) in first line and 135 (9.7%) in second line. Kaplan-Meier curves estimated a higher persistence for ustekinumab-treated patients followed by vedolizumab, infliximab and adalimumab, in both lines. Considering baseline variables and adalimumab as reference, infliximab in first line (HR: 0.537) and ustekinumab in first (HR: 0.057) and second line (HR: 0.213) were associated with significantly reduced risk of drug-discontinuation. First line total/average healthcare direct-costs were €13,637, €11,201, €17,104 and €18,340 in patients persistent on adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab and vedolizumab, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This real-world analysis showed differences in persistence over 12-months between biologic treatments, being higher in ustekinumab-treated group, followed by vedolizumab, infliximab and adalimumab. Patients' management was associated with comparable direct healthcare costs among treatment lines, mainly driven by drug-related expenses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Degli Esposti
- CliCon S.r.l., Società Benefit, Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, 40137 Bologna, Italy.
| | - Marco Daperno
- SC Gastroenterologia AO Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, 10128 Torino, Italy
| | - Melania Dovizio
- CliCon S.r.l., Società Benefit, Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, 40137 Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Diego Sangiorgi
- CliCon S.r.l., Società Benefit, Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, 40137 Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Franco Scaldaferri
- CEMAD (Centro Malattie Apparato Digerente) - UOS Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche Intestinali, IBD UNIT, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCSS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Serra
- Janssen Cilag Spa, 20093 Cologno Monzese, Milano, Italy
| | - Valentina Perrone
- CliCon S.r.l., Società Benefit, Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, 40137 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- IBD Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Milano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zhdanava M, Kachroo S, Manceur AM, Ding Z, Holiday C, Zhao R, Godwin B, Pilon D. Persistence Among Patients with Crohn Disease Previously Treated with an Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor and Switching or Cycling to Another Biologic Agent. Clin Ther 2023; 45:770-777. [PMID: 37442653 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Nonresponse to an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent in patients with Crohn disease (CD) is often managed by either a switch to a different class of biologic (ie, ustekinumab, vedolizumab) or by cycling to another anti-TNF agent (ie, adalimumab, infliximab, certolizumab pegol). Persistence after a switch to a different biologic class or after cycling within the anti-TNF class was assessed in patients with nonresponse to an anti-TNF agent. METHODS Adults with CD who discontinued from an anti-TNF agent and either switched to a different class of biologic (ie, anti-interleukin/integrin; the switching cohort) or cycled within the anti-TNF class (the cycling cohort) between September 23, 2016, and August 1, 2019, were selected from a commercial database. The index date was defined as the date of the first claim of the subsequent-line biologic (index biologic) after an anti-TNF. The switching and cycling cohorts were balanced with regard to baseline characteristics, using inverse probability of treatment weights-average treatment effect (IPTW-ATE). Persistence with the index biologic was defined as consistent use with no gaps of >120 days (ustekinumab, vedolizumab, infliximab) or of >60 days (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol) in biologic supply. Composite end points were persistence while being corticosteroid-free (defined as no use of corticosteroids with ≥14 days of supply after day 90 post-index) and persistence while on monotherapy (no immunomodulators/nonindex biologics). Weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used to assess outcomes at 12 months post-index. FINDINGS There were 444 patients in the weighted switching cohort (mean age, 40.4 years; 56.3% female) and 441 in the weighted cycling cohort (mean age, 39.5 years; 58.4% female). At 12 months post-index, the rate of persistence with the index biologic was 75.7% in the switching cohort compared to 67.5% in the cycling cohort (log-rank P = 0.023); the rate of persistence while on monotherapy was 58.2% compared to 44.2%, respectively (log-rank P < 0.001). The rate of persistence was 44% greater in the switching compared to that in the cycling cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11-1.88; P = 0.007); the rate of persistence while on monotherapy was 56% greater in the switching cohort (HR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.28-1.90; P < 0.001). The between-cohort difference in persistence while being corticosteroid-free was not statistically significant (HR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.89-1.32; P = 0.426). IMPLICATIONS Patients with CD who switched to a different biologic class were more persistent than were patients who cycled to another anti-TNF agent. These findings may be useful for physicians when considering the treatment of patients who have experienced nonresponse or loss of response to the first-line anti-TNF agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Zhijie Ding
- Janssen Scientific Affairs LLC, Horsham, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Ruizhi Zhao
- Janssen Scientific Affairs LLC, Horsham, Pennsylvania
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Konikoff T, Yanai H, Libchik D, Avni-Biron I, Snir Y, Banai H, Broytman Y, Dotan I, Ollech JE. Vedolizumab Is Associated with Longer Drug Sustainability Compared to Infliximab in Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Long-Term Real-World Cohort Data. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4488. [PMID: 37445523 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Drug sustainability (DS) is a surrogate marker for treatment efficacy. We aimed to compare the DS of two main biologics used to treat moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), infliximab (IFX) and vedolizumab (VDZ), in a real-world setting. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary medical center in Israel. We included patients treated between 1 December 2017 and 1 May 2021, who were followed for up to 300 weeks. DS was defined as corticosteroid-, surgical-, and hospitalization-free treatment. RESULTS 217 patients with UC were included. VDZ had a significantly longer median DS of 265.6 weeks compared to IFX's 106.5 weeks (p = 0.001) in treatment-naïve patients, even when adjusting for disease severity (HR 0.55 95 CI 0.3-0.98, p = 0.042). In treatment-experienced patients, DS was comparable between IFX and VDZ (p = 0.593). CONCLUSIONS VDZ showed significantly longer DS in treatment-naïve patients with UC compared to IFX, also when adjusted for disease severity. There was no difference in DS between VDZ and IFX in treatment-experienced patients and patients switching from one drug to another. VDZ may be a suitable first-line treatment for biologic-naïve patients with moderate-to-severe UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Konikoff
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva 4941492, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
| | - Henit Yanai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva 4941492, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
| | - Dror Libchik
- Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
| | - Irit Avni-Biron
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva 4941492, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
| | - Yifat Snir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva 4941492, Israel
| | - Hagar Banai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva 4941492, Israel
| | - Yelena Broytman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva 4941492, Israel
| | - Iris Dotan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva 4941492, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
| | - Jacob E Ollech
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva 4941492, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zhdanava M, Zhao R, Manceur AM, Kachroo S, Lefebvre P, Pilon D. Persistence and Dose Escalation During Maintenance Phase and Use of Nonbiologic Medications Among Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Initiated on Ustekinumab in the United States. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2023; 5:otad045. [PMID: 37671391 PMCID: PMC10476877 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otad045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Real-world data on treatment patterns among patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) initiated on ustekinumab are limited. Methods Adults with UC initiated on ustekinumab (index date) between 10/18/2019 and 04/31/2022 were selected from a deidentified health insurance claims database (Symphony Health, an ICON plc Company, PatientSource). Persistence (no gaps in days of supply >120 days), persistence while being corticosteroid-free (no corticosteroid use for ≥14 days of supply after a 90-day grace period from index date) and dose escalation (≥2 consecutive subcutaneous claims ≥100% above daily maintenance dose) were described during the maintenance phase using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Nonbiologic treatments, among patients with ≥2 ustekinumab claims within 90 days post-index and ≥6 months of follow-up, were compared with logistic models 6 months post- versus pre-ustekinumab initiation. Results 6565 patients on ustekinumab entered the maintenance phase. At month 12 of the maintenance phase, 72.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70.1%-73.9%) were persistent, 50.8% (95% CI: 48.7%-52.9%) were persistent and corticosteroid-free, and 19.2% (95% CI: 17.3%-21.3%) of patients had dose escalation. In the 6 months post- versus pre-ustekinumab initiation, the odds of nonbiologic medication use assessed in 4147 patients were significantly lower: 57% lower odds for corticosteroid, 46% for 60 cumulative days of corticosteroid, 42% for 5-aminosalicylic acid, and 24% for immunomodulators (all P < .001). Conclusions Most patients with UC reaching the maintenance phase on ustekinumab remained persistent after 12 months of maintenance therapy. Nonbiologic medication use post-ustekinumab initiation was significantly lower, notably for corticosteroids. Given the multiple complications associated with chronic corticosteroid use, this reduction can be seen as clinically relevant and informs treatment choice for patients with UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ruizhi Zhao
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mc Gettigan N, Allen K, Saeidi R, O’ Toole A, Boland K. A systematic review of the effect of structured exercise on inflammation and body composition in inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:143. [PMID: 37227593 PMCID: PMC10212817 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04437-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Given the substantial risk of treatment failure in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), adjuvant therapies may play a role in disease management. We aim to carry out a systematic review to examine the effects of structured exercise on the inflammatory response in patients with IBD. Our secondary aim is to examine the effect of structured exercise programmes on body composition given both an increase in visceral obesity and the presence of sarcopenia have deleterious effects on outcomes in IBD. METHODS A systematic review was carried out following the Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR) manual and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Title/Abstract and MeSH Terms were used to search for relevant studies. RESULTS In total, 1516 records were screened for eligibility, and 148 records were reviewed for eligibility, of which 16 were included and a further 7 studies were identified from hand searching references. Four studies included body composition outcomes, and 14 studies reviewed the inflammatory response to exercise. CONCLUSION Further studies of adequate duration are required to include patients with more active disease to demonstrate an inflammatory response to exercise. Body composition measurements including muscle mass and visceral adiposity may play a key role in response to medical therapy in IBD and should be included as exploratory outcomes in future studies. A meta-analysis was not carried out due to the significant heterogeneity amongst studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neasa Mc Gettigan
- Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kathryn Allen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Reza Saeidi
- Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aoibhlinn O’ Toole
- Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Karen Boland
- Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Akuffo-Addo E, Udounwa T, Chan J, Cauchi L. Exploring Biologic Treatment Hesitancy Among Black and Indigenous Populations in Canada: a Review. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023; 10:942-951. [PMID: 35476223 PMCID: PMC9045033 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-022-01282-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Biologics are becoming an increasingly important part of patient care across Canada. Recent studies from the USA show that Black patients are less likely than White patients to receive biologic treatment for several medical conditions. The relative lack of race-based data in Canada makes it difficult to replicate such studies in Canada. As a result, there is a paucity of literature that explores the association between biologic usage and race in Canada. Our review aims to explore the factors that might be driving racial treatment disparity in Canada that likely parallels the inequalities found in the USA. We provide a summary of the available literature on the factors that contribute to biologic treatment hesitancy among Black and Indigenous populations in Canada. We highlight several solutions that have been proposed in the literature to address biologic treatment hesitancy. Our review found that biologic treatment decision at the individual level can be very complex as patient's decisions are influenced by social inputs from family and trusted community members, biologic-related factors (negative injection experience, fear of needles, formulation, and unfamiliarity), cultural tenets (beliefs, values, perception of illness), and historical and systemic factors (past research injustices, socioeconomic status, patient-physician relationship, clinical trial representation). Some proposed solutions to address biologic treatment hesitancy among Black and Indigenous populations include increasing the number of Black and Indigenous researchers involved in and leading clinical trials, formally training physicians and healthcare workers to deliver culturally competent care, and eliminating financial barriers to accessing medications. Further research is needed to characterize and address race-based new treatment inequalities and hesitancy in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgar Akuffo-Addo
- Undergraduate Medical Education, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Medical Information, Amgen Canada Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada.
| | - Theodora Udounwa
- Medical Information, Amgen Canada Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada.,Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jocelyn Chan
- Medical Information, Amgen Canada Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada.,Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laura Cauchi
- Medical Information, Amgen Canada Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Orfanoudaki E, Foteinogiannopoulou K, Theodoraki E, Koutroubakis IE. Recent Advances in the Optimization of Anti-TNF Treatment in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12072452. [PMID: 37048536 PMCID: PMC10095227 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the evolution in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management during the last 20 years owing to the advent of new advanced therapies, anti-TNF agents still remain the cornerstone of therapy for both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. However, this does not only secure favorable outcomes for patients considering the progressive disease character and the high likelihood of primary or secondary loss of response. Therefore, trying to reach a better treatment approach and maximize the benefits anti-TNF agents offer, optimization strategies should be examined. It has been indicated that optimizing treatment with anti-TNF enhances drug efficacy and has been associated with improved disease outcomes and a complication-free disease course. From this perspective, we aim to provide an overview of currently available data and recent advances in the practices of anti-TNF treatment optimization. Special focus has been given to the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), as well as the utility of combining anti-TNF with an immunomodulator and the treat-to-target approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Orfanoudaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Kalliopi Foteinogiannopoulou
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Eirini Theodoraki
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Ioannis E Koutroubakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jensen KJ, Jensen CB, Wennerström C, Burisch J, Petersen J. Drug utilization of biologic therapy in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: a population-based Danish cohort study 2015-2020. Scand J Gastroenterol 2023:1-11. [PMID: 36802972 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2173988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to characterize the drug utilization and switch patterns of biological treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS Using Danish national registries, this nationwide study included individuals diagnosed with UC or CD, bio-naïve at the initiation of treatment with infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, golimumab, or ustekinumab in 2015-2020. Hazard ratios of discontinuing the first treatment or switching to another biological treatment were explored using Cox regression. RESULTS Among 2995 UC patients and 3028 CD patients, infliximab was used as a first-line biologic treatment in 89% of UC patients and 85% of CD patients, followed by adalimumab with 6%, vedolizumab with 3%, and golimumab with 1% for UC, and adalimumab with 12%, vedolizumab with 2%, and ustekinumab with 0.4% for CD.When comparing adalimumab as the first treatment series to infliximab, there was a higher risk of treatment discontinuation (excluding switch) among UC patients (hazard ratio: 2.02 [95% confidence interval: 1.57; 2.60]) and CD patients (1.85 [1.52; 2.24]). When comparing vedolizumab to infliximab, there was a lower risk of discontinuation for UC patients (0.51 [0.29-0.89]), and for CD patients, although not significantly (0.58 [0.32-1.03]). We observed no significant difference in the risk of switching to another biologic treatment for any of the biologics. CONCLUSION More than 85% of UC and CD patients initiating biologic therapy had infliximab as their first-line biologic treatment, in accordance with official treatment guidelines. Future studies should explore the higher incidence of treatment discontinuation of adalimumab as the first treatment series.Key summarySeveral biologic therapies are available in the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.Clinical guidelines stipulate that infliximab should be the first-line biologic therapy.Drug utilization studies comparing biologic therapies head-to-head are sparse.In Denmark, during 2015-2020 infliximab remained the most widely used biologic treatment, with adalimumab being second.One in four patients experienced more than one biologic during the study period.The risk of discontinuation of biologic treatment (and not starting a new biologic) was higher for initiators of adalimumab.Clinical and social background factors available from the registers could not account for the observed risk difference in discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristoffer Jarlov Jensen
- Copenhagen Phase IV Unit (Phase4CPH), Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Camilla Bjørn Jensen
- Copenhagen Phase IV Unit (Phase4CPH), Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Johan Burisch
- Gastrounit, Medical Division, University Hospital Copenhagen - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, University Hospital Copenhagen - Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Janne Petersen
- Copenhagen Phase IV Unit (Phase4CPH), Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Zhdanava M, Ding Z, Manceur AM, Muser E, Lefebvre P, Holiday C, Lafeuille MH, Pilon D. Treatment persistence among bio-naïve patients with Crohn's disease initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab. Curr Med Res Opin 2023; 39:533-543. [PMID: 36752586 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2178148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare persistence and describe dose titration among bio-naïve patients with Crohn's disease (CD) initiated on ustekinumab or adalimumab. METHODS Bio-naïve adults with CD who initiated ustekinumab or adalimumab (index date) from 23 September 2016 (ustekinumab US approval for CD) to 1 August 2019 were selected from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus. Cohorts were balanced on baseline characteristics measured over 12 months pre-index using inverse probability of treatment weights. Persistence was defined as no gaps (ustekinumab: >120 days; adalimumab: >60 days) between days of supply. Dose escalation was defined as ≥2 consecutive sub-cutaneous claims 100% above the US label daily dose in the maintenance phase; de-escalation was a return to the daily dose for ≥2 consecutive claims. Outcomes were described using weighted Kaplan-Meier models; persistence outcomes were compared using Cox's proportional hazards models. RESULTS At 12 months post-index, patients in the ustekinumab (n = 948) versus adalimumab (n = 4143) cohort had a significantly higher rate of persistence on index biologic (hazard ratio [HR] 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29-1.74). A total of 830 (87.6%) patients in the ustekinumab cohort and 3713 (89.6%) in the adalimumab cohort began the maintenance phase; within 12 months, 11.2% and 16.9%, underwent a dose escalation, and 26.6% and 6.3%, respectively, subsequently de-escalated to the per US label daily exposure. CONCLUSIONS Bio-naïve patients with CD initiated on ustekinumab were more persistent than patients initiated on adalimumab; moreover, these patients had numerically lower dose escalation and higher de-escalation rates than patients initiated on adalimumab. Findings support the use of ustekinumab as a first-line treatment for bio-naïve patients with CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zhijie Ding
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
| | | | - Erik Muser
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Armuzzi A, Hart A, Cappelleri JC, Mammar N, Hur P, Hoskin B, Hennessy F, Milligan G, Dignass A. Characteristics, clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes of patients with ulcerative colitis receiving tofacitinib: a real-world survey in the United States and five European countries. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:17. [PMID: 36658481 PMCID: PMC9849840 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02640-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To describe variations in treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes (PRO), and physician and patient satisfaction in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with tofacitinib in a real-world setting. METHODS Data were drawn from the Adelphi UC Disease Specific Programme™, a point-in-time survey of physicians and their consulting patients in the US and Europe. For inclusion in this analysis, gastroenterologists completed medical record forms for the next seven consecutive consulting patients with confirmed UC, plus a further two patient record forms for patients treated with tofacitinib. Those same patients then completed a patient-reported questionnaire. RESULTS Gastroenterologists (n = 340) provided data for 2049 patients with UC, including 642 patients receiving tofacitinib. Physicians' most frequent reason for choosing tofacitinib was overall efficacy (71.3% of patients). The proportion of patients in remission increased with length of treatment, from 13.7% at [0, 4) weeks to 68.3% at [52+] weeks. Both physicians and patients reported that the Mayo components of stool frequency and blood in stool were reduced with time on treatment. Improvement in symptoms (bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain/cramps, urgency, rectal bleeding, fatigue/tiredness) was reported in the first weeks of treatment, and increased with time. At week [52+], mean score reductions from treatment initiation to current in overall symptom severity, pain, and fatigue were 2.2 (to a current mean score of 1.1), 2.2 (to 0.9), and 2.1 (to 1.0), respectively. Comparing patients at weeks [0, 4) and [52+] (all PROs, p < 0.0001), the increase in EQ-5D-5L index total score was 0.29 points and in SIBDQ total score was 20.5 points; percent reductions in WPAI absenteeism was 34.4%, presenteeism 26.8%, overall work impairment 40.9% and activity impairment was 28.3%. These changes reached the thresholds for minimally clinically important differences. The majority of physicians (91.9%) and patients (93.5%) were satisfied with tofacitinib at week [52+]. CONCLUSION Patients with moderate-to-severe UC treated with tofacitinib show considerable improvement in symptoms and quality of life from tofacitinib initiation to one year and beyond, with high rates of remission. Physicians and patients report satisfaction with UC control at recommended doses in a mostly biologic experienced population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Armuzzi
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807IBD Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy ,grid.452490.eDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Ailsa Hart
- grid.416510.7IBD Unit, St. Mark’s Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Nadir Mammar
- grid.476471.70000 0004 0593 9797Pfizer France, Paris, France
| | - Peter Hur
- grid.410513.20000 0000 8800 7493Pfizer Inc, New York, NY USA
| | | | | | | | - Axel Dignass
- grid.491941.00000 0004 0621 6785Department of Medicine I, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cai Q, Ding Z, Fu AZ, Patel AA. Racial or ethnic differences on treatment adherence and persistence among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases initiated with biologic therapies. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:545. [PMID: 36581802 PMCID: PMC9801546 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02560-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease with the potential for significant morbidity in case of suboptimal treatment (e.g. low treatment adherence). In spite of immense research in IBD, literature on association of IBD with race/ethnicity is fragmented. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and treatment adherence and persistence among patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) initiated with biologic therapies. METHODS This observational, retrospective study utilized the Optum Clinformatics (Optum) Extended Data Mart Socioeconomic Status (SES) database. Adult patients with ≥ 2 medical claims for CD or UC diagnosis, ≥ 1 medical or pharmacy claim for corresponding FDA-approved biologic therapy, and a ≥ 12-month pre-index (index date: date of the first biologic medical/pharmacy claim) continuous health plan enrollment were included. Treatment adherence was measured as the proportion of days covered of ≥ 80% and treatment persistence by the number of days from the index date to the biologics discontinuation date. Switching among biologics was allowed for both treatment adherence and treatment persistence. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and treatment adherence/persistence. RESULTS Among patients with CD (N = 1430) and UC (N = 1059) included, majority were White (CD: 80.3%, UC: 78.3%), followed by African Americans (AA; CD: 10.5%, UC: 9.7%). Among patients with CD, AA were significantly less likely to adhere to biologics (adjusted OR [95%CI]: 0.61 [0.38; 0.99]) and more likely to discontinue biologics earlier (adjusted HR [95%CI]: 1.52 [1.16; 2.0]) during the follow-up period compared to Whites, after adjusting for other patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Among patients with UC, no significant differences in the treatment adherence/persistence were observed between different races/ethnicities. CONCLUSIONS Patients with CD were found to display racial differences in the treatment adherence and persistence of biologics, with significantly lower adherence and earlier discontinuation in AA compared to Whites. Such differences were not observed in patients with UC. Future studies are warranted to understand the possible reasons for racial differences, particularly in patients with CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Cai
- grid.497530.c0000 0004 0389 4927Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 1125 Trenton Harbourton Rd, Titusville, NJ 08560 USA
| | - Zhijie Ding
- grid.497530.c0000 0004 0389 4927Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 800 Ridgeview Drive, Horsham, PA 19044 USA
| | - Alex Z. Fu
- grid.497530.c0000 0004 0389 4927Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 1125 Trenton Harbourton Rd, Titusville, NJ 08560 USA ,grid.411667.30000 0001 2186 0438Georgetown University Medical Center, 3900 Reservoir Road, Washington, DC 20057 USA
| | - Aarti A. Patel
- grid.497530.c0000 0004 0389 4927Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 1125 Trenton Harbourton Rd, Titusville, NJ 08560 USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Barbieri MA, Viola A, Cicala G, Spina E, Fries W. Effectiveness and Safety Profiles of Biological Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Real Life Data from an Active Pharmacovigilance Project. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123280. [PMID: 36552036 PMCID: PMC9775949 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Post-marketing surveillance is essential to evaluate the risk/benefit profile of drugs; however, pharmacovigilance studies comparing persistence and safety of biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are scant. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate persistence together with safety profiles of biologics in a cohort of patients diagnosed with Crohn's Disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) followed by the IBD unit of Messina and treated with infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), golimumab (GOL), vedolizumab (VED), and ustekinumab (UST) from 2017 through 2021. Descriptive and treatment persistence analyses with predictors for discontinuation and occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were performed. A total of 675 IBD patients were enrolled. A higher persistence rate was noted for UST and ADA in the first year (83.8% and 83.1%, respectively) and for IFX in the fifth year of treatment (58.1%). GOL, VED, and UST-all used as second/third-line therapies-seemed to have a higher risk of non-persistence than IFX (in order HR: 2.19; CI 95%: 1.33-3.61, 1.45; 1.04-2.04, 2.25; 1.25-4.07) as well as switchers and those who had at least one ADR (18.1; 13.22-24.68 and 1.55; 1.20-1.99, respectively). The reported ADRs, which were generally mild-moderate, were largely known. However, real-world data should be implemented to further study undetected safety concerns, including risk of malignancy.
Collapse
|
43
|
Cassinotti A, Mezzina N, De Silvestri A, Di Paolo D, Lenti MV, Bezzio C, Stradella D, Mauri M, Zadro V, Ricci C, Casini V, Radice E, Massari A, Maconi G, Saibeni S, Caprioli F, Tari R, Fichera M, Cortelezzi CC, Parravicini M, Tinelli C, Testoni PA, Pace F, Segato S, Invernizzi P, Occhipinti P, Manes G, Di Sabatino A, Pastorelli L, Vecchi M, Ardizzone S. Continuous clinical remission with biologics in ulcerative colitis: the 'AURORA' comparison study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 34:1238-1246. [PMID: 36165081 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Comparative trials among biological drugs for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) provided conflicting results. After patent expire of infliximab originator, adalimumab, infliximab biosimilar, golimumab and vedolizumab have been approved in Italy.We compared the efficacy of these four biologics in UC according to the concept of continuous clinical remission (CCR). METHODS In a retrospective, multicentre study, all UC patients treated with adalimumab, infliximab biosimilar, golimumab or vedolizumab between 2014 and 2019 were included. All drugs were compared to each other according to the 1-year CCR rate, defined as Mayo partial score ≤2, with bleeding subscore = 0, without any relapse or optimization with dose escalation, topical treatments or steroid use after first clinical remission. RESULTS Four-hundred sixteen patients (adalimumab = 90, infliximab biosimilar = 105, golimumab = 79, vedolizumab = 142) were included. CCR was achieved in similar percentages among the groups (33%, 37%, 28%, 37%, respectively). All drugs were equivalent in biologic-naive patients, while vedolizumab was better than a second anti-TNFα in prior anti-TNFα agent failures. No differences were found according to type of adverse events or severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Based on a strict definition of clinical remission, all biologics appear equally effective at 1 year. Changing to vedolizumab is more effective than switching to another anti-TNFα in TNFα failures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Cassinotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biochemical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese
| | - Nicolò Mezzina
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biochemical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan
- Postgraduate School in Gastroenterology, University of Milan, Milan
| | | | - Dhanai Di Paolo
- Postgraduate School in Gastroenterology, University of Milan, Milan
- Gastroenterology Unit, Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese
| | - Marco Vincenzo Lenti
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia
| | | | | | - Martina Mauri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Center for Autoimmune Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca
- European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER), San Gerardo Hospital, Monza
| | - Valentina Zadro
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biochemical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan
- Postgraduate School in Gastroenterology, University of Milan, Milan
| | - Chiara Ricci
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia
| | | | | | - Alessandro Massari
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biochemical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan
| | - Giovanni Maconi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biochemical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan
| | | | - Flavio Caprioli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano
| | - Roberto Tari
- Gastroenterology Unit, Ospedale Maggiore della Carità, Novara
| | - Maria Fichera
- Division of Gastroenterology and Center for Autoimmune Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca
- European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER), San Gerardo Hospital, Monza
| | | | - Marco Parravicini
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese
| | - Carmine Tinelli
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia
| | | | - Fabio Pace
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Bergamo Est, Seriate
| | - Sergio Segato
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese
| | - Pietro Invernizzi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Center for Autoimmune Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca
- European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER), San Gerardo Hospital, Monza
| | | | | | - Antonio Di Sabatino
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia
| | - Luca Pastorelli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Vecchi
- Postgraduate School in Gastroenterology, University of Milan, Milan
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
| | - Sandro Ardizzone
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biochemical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bokemeyer B, Picker N, Wilke T, Rosin L, Patel H. Inadequate Response, Treatment Patterns, Health Care Utilization, and Associated Costs in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Retrospective Cohort Study Based on German Claims Data. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2022; 28:1647-1657. [PMID: 35134912 PMCID: PMC9629453 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izab330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-world data regarding response rates in ulcerative colitis treatment are rare, particularly for later lines of therapy. This study aimed to assess continuity of and changes to advanced therapies, as well as costs and specific indicators defining suboptimal therapy. METHODS German claims data were retrospectively analyzed (January 2014 to June 2019). Patients with ulcerative colitis initiating an advanced therapy (adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, tofacitinib, vedolizumab) were included. Inadequate response was indicated by therapy discontinuation, switch, escalation, augmentation, corticosteroid dependency, disease-related hospitalization, or surgery. Health care resource utilization (inpatient, outpatient, sick leaves, medication, aids, and remedies) and related costs were assessed from therapy initiation until discontinuation or loss to follow-up. RESULTS Among 574 patients (median age, 39 years; female sex, 53.5%) who initiated advanced therapies, 458 (79.8%) received an antitumor necrosis factor therapy, 113 (19.7%) vedolizumab, and 3 (0.5%) tofacitinib. After 12 months, 75% had ≥1 indicator for suboptimal therapy. The median time to first indicated inadequate response was 4.8 months. Therapy discontinuation (38%), switching (26%), and prolonged use of steroids (36%) were common within the first year of treatment. In an unadjusted comparison, all-cause total costs per person-year were significantly higher in those who switched vs patients remaining on their therapy (€44,570 vs €36,807; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Our study indicates a high prevalence of inadequate response to advanced therapies. Only 25% of patients showed adequate response within 12 months after therapy initiation. Frequent dose and treatment changes were observed. The economic impact of suboptimal therapy in ulcerative colitis is substantial, highlighting the ongoing need for improved treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd Bokemeyer
- Interdisciplinary Crohn Colitis Centre Minden, Minden, Germany
| | | | | | - Ludger Rosin
- Galapagos Biopharma Deutschland GmbH, München, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rezazadeh Ardabili A, Jeuring S, Mujagic Z, Oostenbrug L, Romberg‐Camps M, Jonkers D, van Bodegraven A, Pierik M. Classic drugs in the time of new drugs: real-world, long-term outcomes of thiopurine monotherapy in 1016 patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 56:1030-1043. [PMID: 35794735 PMCID: PMC9544244 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thiopurines remain recommended as maintenance therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Despite their widespread use, long-term effectiveness data are sparse and safety is an increasingly debated topic which thwarts proper delineation in the current IBD treatment algorithm. AIMS To document effectiveness and safety of thiopurine monotherapy in patients with IBD, using the population-based IBD South-Limburg (IBDSL) cohort METHODS: All patients starting thiopurine monotherapy as maintenance between 1991 and 2014 were included. Therapy was defined as effective if there was no escalation to biologicals, no course of corticosteroids, no surgery and no hospitalisation for active disease during treatment. Long-term effectiveness was assessed by adjusting for differences in follow-up using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Mid- to long-term safety regarding cancer incidence and clinically relevant liver disease was documented. RESULTS In total, 1016 patients (643 Crohn's disease [CD]; 373 ulcerative colitis [UC]) received thiopurine monotherapy at a median of 15.2 (Q1-Q3 4.2-48.5) months after diagnosis. During follow-up, effectiveness rates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 64%, 45%, 32%, respectively, in CD and and 66%, 41%, 36%, respectively in UC. No statistically significant differences in effectiveness were observed after stratification for era of initiation (pre-biological vs biological, CD: p = 0.56; UC: p = 0.43). Sixteen non-melanoma skin cancers (incidence rate [IR] 3.33/1000 PY), five lymphomas (IR 1.04/1000 PY) and one urinary tract cancer (IR 0.21/1000 PY) were recorded. Two cases of portal hypertension were identified. CONCLUSION In real-world practice, thiopurine monotherapy remains effective, safe and durable for patients with CD or UC, including in the era of biologics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashkan Rezazadeh Ardabili
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMaastricht University Medical Centre+MaastrichtThe Netherlands
- School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM)Maastricht University Medical Centre+MaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Steven Jeuring
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMaastricht University Medical Centre+MaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Zlatan Mujagic
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMaastricht University Medical Centre+MaastrichtThe Netherlands
- School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM)Maastricht University Medical Centre+MaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Liekele Oostenbrug
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine (Co‐MIK)Zuyderland Medical CentreSittard‐GeleenThe Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle Romberg‐Camps
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine (Co‐MIK)Zuyderland Medical CentreSittard‐GeleenThe Netherlands
| | - Daisy Jonkers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMaastricht University Medical Centre+MaastrichtThe Netherlands
- School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM)Maastricht University Medical Centre+MaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Adriaan van Bodegraven
- Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine (Co‐MIK)Zuyderland Medical CentreSittard‐GeleenThe Netherlands
| | - Marieke Pierik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMaastricht University Medical Centre+MaastrichtThe Netherlands
- School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM)Maastricht University Medical Centre+MaastrichtThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Atia O, Pujol‐Muncunill G, Navas‐López VM, Orlanski‐Meyer E, Ledder O, Lev‐Tzion R, Focht G, Shteyer E, Stein R, Aloi M, Russell RK, Martin‐de‐Carpi J, Turner D. Children included in randomised controlled trials of biologics in inflammatory bowel diseases do not represent the real-world patient mix. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 56:794-801. [PMID: 35735987 PMCID: PMC9542175 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients enrolled in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) may differ from the target population due to restricted eligibility criteria. AIM To compare treatment response to biologics in routine practice for children with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) who would and would not have been eligible for enrolment in the regulatory RCT of the same drug. METHODS We enrolled children with IBD who initiated adalimumab, infliximab, vedolizumab or ustekinumab. The eligibility criteria as defined in the RCT of the corresponding biologic were applied to each patient. The primary outcome was 12-month steroid-free remission (SFR) without switching biologics or undergoing surgery. RESULTS We screened 289 children (198 [68%] with Crohn's disease [CD], 91 [32%] with ulcerative colitis [UC]) with 326 initiations of biologics. Only 62 of 164 (38%) children with moderate-to-severe disease would have been eligible for inclusion in the original RCTs. The SFR rate was higher in the eligible children (51%) than in the ineligible children (31%; OR 2.3 [95%CI 1.2-4.5]; p = 0.01). The main exclusion criterion was prohibited previous therapies (47%). Ineligible CD patients were older, more often had a family history of IBD and had higher levels of CRP than eligible children; in UC there were no differences between the groups. CONCLUSION Most children with IBD who initiate biologics would not have been eligible to be included in the corresponding regulatory RCTs. The outcomes of ineligible patients were worse than for eligible patients. Results from RCTs should be interpreted with caution when applied to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ohad Atia
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and NutritionShaare Zedek Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael,The Faculty of MedicineThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | | | | | - Esther Orlanski‐Meyer
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and NutritionShaare Zedek Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael,The Faculty of MedicineThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Oren Ledder
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and NutritionShaare Zedek Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael,The Faculty of MedicineThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Raffi Lev‐Tzion
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and NutritionShaare Zedek Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
| | - Gili Focht
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and NutritionShaare Zedek Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael,The Faculty of MedicineThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Eyal Shteyer
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and NutritionShaare Zedek Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael,The Faculty of MedicineThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Ronen Stein
- Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Marina Aloi
- Sapienza University of Rome – Umberto I HospitalRomeItaly
| | | | | | - Dan Turner
- Juliet Keidan Institute of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and NutritionShaare Zedek Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael,The Faculty of MedicineThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bouhnik Y, Atreya R, Casey D, Górecki M, Baik D, Yoon SW, Kwon TS, Jang M. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Subcutaneous Infliximab for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Sequential Biologic Treatment. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2022:6658536. [PMID: 35942647 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izac160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) guidelines recommend tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFis) for patients who have not responded to conventional therapy, and vedolizumab in case of inadequate response to conventional therapy and/or TNFis. Recent studies have shown that vedolizumab may also be effective in the earlier treatment lines. Therefore, we conducted cost-effectiveness analyses to determine the optimal treatment sequence in patients with IBD. METHODS A Markov model with a 10-year time horizon compared the cost-effectiveness of different biologic treatment sequences in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) from the UK and French perspectives. Subcutaneous formulations of infliximab, vedolizumab, and adalimumab were evaluated. Comparative effectiveness was based on a network meta-analysis of clinical trials and real-world evidence. Costs included pharmacotherapy, surgery, adverse events, and disease management. RESULTS The results indicated that treatment sequences starting with infliximab were less costly and more effective than those starting with vedolizumab for patients with UC in the United Kingdom and France, and patients with just CD in France. For patients with CD in the United Kingdom, treatment sequences starting with infliximab resulted in better health outcomes with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) near the threshold. CONCLUSIONS Based on the ICERs, treatment sequences starting with infliximab are the dominant option for patients with UC in the United Kingdom, and patients with UC and CD in France. In UK patients with CD, ICERs were near the assumed "willingness to pay" threshold. These results reinforce the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations for using infliximab prior to using vedolizumab in biologics-naïve patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoram Bouhnik
- Beaujon Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Paris University, Clichy, France
| | - Raja Atreya
- Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Daniel Casey
- Celltrion Healthcare United Kingdom Limited, Slough, United Kingdom
| | | | - Deborah Baik
- Celltrion Healthcare Co., Ltd., Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Wook Yoon
- Celltrion Healthcare Co., Ltd., Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Taek Sang Kwon
- Celltrion Healthcare Co., Ltd., Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Minyoung Jang
- Celltrion Healthcare Co., Ltd., Incheon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Alharbi O, Aljebreen AM, Azzam NA, Almadi MA, Saeed M, HajkhderMullaissa B, Asiri H, Almutairi A, AlRuthia Y. Predictors of Anti-TNF Therapy Failure among Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Single-Center Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11144157. [PMID: 35887921 PMCID: PMC9321911 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The advent of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has revolutionized the management of many immune-mediated diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Infliximab and adalimumab were the first mAbs approved for the management of IBD, and are still commonly prescribed for the treatment of both Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Although mAbs have demonstrated high effectiveness rates in the management of IBD, some patients fail to respond adequately to mAbs, resulting in disease progression and the flare-up of symptoms. Objective: The objective was to explore the predictors of treatment failure among IBD patients on infliximab (INF) and adalimumab (ADA)—as demonstrated via colonoscopy with a simple endoscopic score (SES–CD) of ≥1 for CD and a Mayo score of ≥2 for UC—and compare the rates of treatment failure among patients on those two mAbs. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study among IBD patients aged 18 years and above who had not had any exposure to mAbs before. Those patients were followed after the initiation of biologic treatment with either INF or ADA until they were switched to another treatment due to failure of these mAbs in preventing the disease progression. Univariate and multiple logistic regressions were conducted to examine the predictors and rates of treatment failure. Results: A total of 146 IBD patients (118 patients on INF and 28 on ADA) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The mean age of the patients was 31 years, and most of them were males (59%) with CD (75%). About 27% and 26% of the patients had penetrating and non-stricturing–non-penetrating CD behavior, respectively. Patients with UC had significantly higher odds of treatment failure compared to their counterparts with CD (OR = 2.58, 95% CI [1.06–6.26], p = 0.035). Those with left-sided disease had significantly higher odds of treatment failure (OR = 4.28, 95% CI [1.42–12.81], p = 0.0094). Patients on ADA had higher odds of treatment failure in comparison to those on INF (OR = 26.91, 95% CI [7.75–93.39], p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Infliximab was shown to be more effective in the management of IBD, with lower incidence rates of treatment failure in comparison to adalimumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Othman Alharbi
- Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; (A.M.A.); (N.A.A.); (M.A.A.); (M.S.); (B.H.)
- Correspondence: (O.A.); (Y.A.); Tel.: +966-114-677-483 (Y.A.); Fax: +966-114-677-480 (Y.A.)
| | - Abdulrahman M. Aljebreen
- Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; (A.M.A.); (N.A.A.); (M.A.A.); (M.S.); (B.H.)
| | - Nahla A. Azzam
- Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; (A.M.A.); (N.A.A.); (M.A.A.); (M.S.); (B.H.)
| | - Majid A. Almadi
- Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; (A.M.A.); (N.A.A.); (M.A.A.); (M.S.); (B.H.)
- Division of Gastroenterology, The McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada
| | - Maria Saeed
- Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; (A.M.A.); (N.A.A.); (M.A.A.); (M.S.); (B.H.)
| | - Baraa HajkhderMullaissa
- Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; (A.M.A.); (N.A.A.); (M.A.A.); (M.S.); (B.H.)
| | - Hassan Asiri
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; (H.A.); (A.A.)
| | - Abdullah Almutairi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; (H.A.); (A.A.)
| | - Yazed AlRuthia
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; (H.A.); (A.A.)
- Pharmacoeconomics Research Unit, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
- Correspondence: (O.A.); (Y.A.); Tel.: +966-114-677-483 (Y.A.); Fax: +966-114-677-480 (Y.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Moens A, Sadat Seyed Tabib N, Ballet V, Sabino J, Vermeire S, Ferrante M. Safety of sequential biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: results from a tertiary referral centre. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 56:271-281. [PMID: 35441398 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biologicals represent the cornerstone of treatment for moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Many patients cycle between biologicals when encountering loss of response or adverse events. AIM To assess the occurrence of serious infections and malignancies with exposure to several (classes of) biologicals. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary referral centre including consecutive IBD patients exposed to adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab or vedolizumab between 1996 and 2019. All serious infections and malignancies, as well as potential confounders, were accounted for. RESULTS In total, 1575 patients were included with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 10 (6-16) years and a duration of biological therapy of 71 (39-112) months. Incidence rates of serious infections were 3.4 per 100 patients' years (PY) in the post-biological setting. Serious infections after biological exposure were associated with systemic steroids in monotherapy (hazard ratio 2.96 [95% confidence interval 1.78-4.93], p < 0.0001), combination therapy of systemic steroids and a biological (2.44 [1.37-4.34], p = 0.002), female gender (1.25 [1.04-1.51], p = 0.02), and prior serious infections in the pre-biological setting (1.42 [1.03-1.96], p = 0.03). Malignancy rates were 1.06 per 100PY in the post-biological setting and increased with older age at biological initiation (1.04 [1.02-1.05], p < 0.0001). The risk for serious infections or malignancies was independent of type and number of biologicals to which the patient was exposed. CONCLUSION This study shows that the sequential use of biological therapy in IBD does not seem to convey an overall higher risk of serious infections or malignancies, but that underlying more refractory disease seems to increase this risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annick Moens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Diseases Metabolism and Ageing, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nasim Sadat Seyed Tabib
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Diseases Metabolism and Ageing, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vera Ballet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - João Sabino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Diseases Metabolism and Ageing, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Diseases Metabolism and Ageing, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marc Ferrante
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Diseases Metabolism and Ageing, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Nguyen JT, Barnes EL, Thorpe CT, Stitzenberg KB, Tak CR, Kinlaw AC. Postoperative Use of Biologics was Less Common among Patients with Crohn's Disease With Emergent/Urgent Versus Elective Intestinal Resection. GASTRO HEP ADVANCES 2022; 1:894-904. [PMID: 36091220 PMCID: PMC9454319 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastha.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Background & Aims Given the risk of intestinal resection for Crohn's disease, postoperative treatment may be informed by several risk factors, including resection type. We compared postoperative treatment strategies for Crohn's disease between emergent/urgent versus elective resection. Methods We identified patients with intestinal resection for Crohn's disease between 2002-2018 using the MarketScan databases. We classified emergent/urgent resections as those occurring after emergency department admission or after the second day of admission. We estimated adjusted risk differences for the association between resection type (emergent/urgent versus elective) and 6-month postoperative medication strategy (biologic monotherapy, biologic combination therapy with an immunomodulator, immunomodulator monotherapy, other non-biologic medication for Crohn's [5-aminosalicylates, antibiotics, corticosteroids], or no medications for Crohn's). Results During 6 months after resection among 4,187 patients, 23% received biologic monotherapy, 6% received combination therapy, 16% received immunomodulator monotherapy, and 36% received other non-biologics. Compared to elective resection, emergent/urgent resection was associated with more common use of "other non-biologic" medications (risk difference 6.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8%, 10.0%), but less common use of biologic monotherapy (risk difference -3.2%; 95% CI -6.2%, -0.1%) and no medications (risk difference -3.6%; 95% CI -6.6%, -0.6%). Conclusions Although patients with emergent/urgent resection may benefit from more aggressive postoperative therapy, there was evidence that emergent/urgent resection was more associated than elective resection with postoperative use of non-biologics for Crohn's disease. Future studies of treatment patterns and comparative effectiveness of postoperative treatment strategies for Crohn's patients should consider these differences between resection types, which may be important drivers of longer-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joehl T. Nguyen
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Edward L. Barnes
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Carolyn T. Thorpe
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Karyn B. Stitzenberg
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Casey R. Tak
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Alan C. Kinlaw
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|