Unique Phenotypic Characteristics and Clinical Course in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Multicenter US Experience

Increased Active Inflammation in the Colon is Not a Reliable Predictor of an Elevated Risk of Dysplasia in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Ulcerative Colitis

Although the increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with both primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and ulcerative colitis (UC; termed PSC-UC) is well documented, the mechanism through which concomitant PSC increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia remains unclear. Given that the risk of colorectal neoplasia in UC is positively correlated with increased histologic inflammation, this study sought to investigate whether increased histologic inflammation could be used to stratify the risk of dysplasia development in patients with PSC-UC. Twenty patients with PSC-UC and dysplasia were compared with 30 control patients with PSC-UC who had no history of neoplasia. For each patient, all surveillance biopsies were scored using a 4-point scoring system: (1) no epithelial neutrophils = 0, (2) cryptitis only = 1, (3) cryptitis plus crypt abscess in <50% of crypts = 2, and (4) crypt abscess in ≥50% of crypts, erosion, neutrophilic exudate, and/or ulceration = 3. A score was designated for each biopsy, and both mean and maximum inflammation scores were calculated from all biopsies taken during each colonoscopy. The inflammation burden score was calculated for each surveillance interval by multiplying the average maximum score between each pair of surveillance episodes by the length of the surveillance interval in years. The average scores derived from all colonoscopies for each patient were used to determine the patient's overall mean, maximum, and inflammation burden scores. In both the dysplasia and control groups, the 3 summative inflammation scores were calculated independently for the entire colon, right colon, and left colon. The dysplasia group consisted of 14 (70%) men and 6 (30%) women, with a mean age of 27 years at UC diagnosis and a long history of pancolitis (mean duration: 17 y). A total of 49 dysplastic lesions were detected in the dysplasia group, and 8 (40%) of the 20 patients had multifocal dysplasia. The majority of dysplastic lesions belonged to nonconventional subtypes (n = 28; 57%) and were located in the right colon (n = 37; 76%). Irrespective of the colon segment, there was no significant difference in the 3 summative inflammation scores between the dysplasia and control groups (P > 0.05). However, in each group, the 3 summative inflammation scores were significantly higher in the right colon than in the left colon (P< 0.05). In conclusion, patients with PSC-UC exhibit increased histologic inflammation in the right colon compared with the left colon, regardless of the presence of dysplasia. Although this may provide an explanation for the predominance of right-sided colorectal neoplasia in patients with PSC-UC, increased histologic inflammation does not reliably predict an elevated risk of dysplasia in patients with PSC-UC. These findings reinforce the current recommendation for annual endoscopic surveillance for all patients with PSC-UC, irrespective of the extent and severity of inflammation.

Prevalence of Hepatobiliary Manifestations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A GRADE Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of more than 1.7 Million Patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] comprises an immune-mediated group of chronic gastrointestinal disorders. Patients with IBD may experience extraintestinal manifestations, such as hepatobiliary complications. This meta-analysis aims to assess the prevalence of different hepatic manifestations in IBD patients.

METHODS

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched until July 20, 2022, by specifying keywords for IBD, hepatic manifestations, and study type. Full texts of cohort studies in English that examined the prevalence of different hepatic manifestations were included in this study. The primary outcome was the overall prevalence of hepatic manifestations in IBD patients. For the statistical analysis, a proportion by random effect model meta-analysis was performed. The registration number for the protocol of this study in PROSPERO is CRD42022369595.

RESULTS

From the 4421 articles retrieved from the primary search, 118 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. After a pooled analysis of 1 729 128 patients, the overall prevalence of hepatic manifestations was 3.49% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.31-3.68%; I2: 99.55%). The pooled prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in 228 216 patients was 26.1% [95% CI: 22.1-30.2%; I2: 99.018%]. After pooled analysis of 9642 patients, the prevalence of primary sclerosing cholangitis was 1.67% [95% CI: 1.47-1.88%; I2: 99.10%]. The pooled prevalence of biliary stones was 4.1% [95% CI: 3.6-4.7%; I2: 97.43%]. Autoimmune hepatitis (0.51% [95% CI: 0.26-0.75%]; I2: 85.36%) and portal vein thrombosis (0.21% [95% CI: 0.08-0.33%]; I2: 97.95%) are considered as rare manifestations.

CONCLUSION

This study summarizes the prevalence and importance of different hepatic manifestations in IBD patients. These findings are crucial for the management of extraintestinal manifestations, especially hepatic manifestations, in IBD patients.

Inflammatory bowel disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis: One disease or two?

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) was declared one of the biggest unmet needs in hepatology during International Liver Congress 2016 in Berlin. Since then, not much has changed unfortunately, largely due to the still elusive pathophysiology of the disease. One of the most striking features of PSC is its association with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with the majority of patients with PSC being diagnosed with extensive colitis. This review describes the epidemiology of IBD in PSC, its specific phenotype, complications and potential pathophysiological mechanisms connecting the two diseases. Whether PSC is merely an extra-intestinal manifestation of IBD or if PSC and IBD are two distinct diseases that happen to share a common susceptibility that leads to a dual phenotype is debated. Implications for the management of the two diseases together are also discussed. Overall, this review summarises the available data in PSC-IBD and discusses whether PSC and IBD are one or two disease(s).

Polygenic risk score predicts risk of primary sclerosing cholangitis in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Forty distinct primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) genomic loci have been identified through multiancestry meta-analyses. The polygenic risk score (PRS) could serve as a promising tool to discover unique disease behaviour, like PSC, underlying inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

AIM

To test whether PRS indicates PSC risk in patients with IBD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mayo Clinic and Washington University at St Louis IBD cohorts were used to test our hypothesis. PRS was modelled through the published PSC loci and weighted with their corresponding effect size. Logistic regression was applied to predict the PSC risk.

RESULTS

In total, 63 (5.6%) among 1130 patients with IBD of European ancestry had PSC. Among 381 ulcerative colitis (UC), 12% had PSC; in contrast to 1.4% in 761 Crohn disease (CD). Compared with IBD alone, IBD-PSC had significantly higher PRS (PSC risk: 3.0% at the lowest PRS quartile vs 7.2% at the highest PRS quartile, Ptrend =.03). In IBD subphenotypes subgroup analysis, multivariate analysis shows that UC-PSC is associated with more extensive UC disease (OR, 5.60; p=0.002) and younger age at diagnosis (p=0.02). In CD, multivariate analysis suggests that CD-PSC is associated with colorectal cancer (OR, 50; p=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

We found evidence that patients with IBD with PSC presented with a clinical course difference from that of patients with IBD alone. PRS can influence PSC risk in patients with IBD. Once validated in an independent cohort, this may help identify patients with the highest likelihood of developing PSC.

The Impact of Concomitant Ulcerative Colitis on the Clinical Course in Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: An Investigation Using a Nationwide Database in Japan

Introoduction

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare disease, especially in Asian countries. PSC often develops during ulcerative colitis (UC). Little is known about the severity of PSC in patients with UC. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the impact of concomitant UC on the clinical course of patients with PSC using a nationwide database in Japan.

Methods

We collected data on patients who were admitted for PSC using a nationwide database and divided eligible admissions according to concomitant UC (PSC-UC group vs. PSC-alone group). We conducted propensity score matching and compared the rates of liver transplantation, biliary drainage, and other clinical events between the two groups. We also conducted a multivariate analysis to identify the clinical factors that affect biliary drainage, cholangiocarcinoma, and liver transplantation.

Results

We enrolled 672 patients after propensity score matching. The rate of liver transplantation in the PSC-UC group was lower than that in the PSC-alone group (2.2 vs. 5.4%, p = 0.002), whereas the rate of biliary drainage did not differ between the two groups (38.1 vs. 33.8%, p = 0.10). On multivariate analysis, concomitant UC was identified as a clinical factor that decreased the risk of liver transplantation (odds ratio = 0.40, 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.68, p = 0.0007).

Discussion

Concomitant UC in patients with PSC may decrease the risk of liver transplantation. The milder disease activity of PSC with UC is more likely compared to that of PSC without UC.

Outcomes of immunomodulator and advanced therapies for primary sclerosing cholangitis-associated inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) coexists in up to 80% of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). The aim of this study is to investigate the outcomes of immunomodulator (IMM)/advanced therapies for the treatment of PSC-IBD.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study of patients with PSC from 1 January 2012 to 1 April 2021. Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with PSC-IBD were included. Primary outcomes were rates and predictors of IMM/advanced therapies to treat PSC-IBD. Secondary outcomes included rates of cholangitis, PSC-IBD clinical remission, and endoscopic healing.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients with PSC were reviewed and 72 (68%) with confirmed PSC-IBD were included in the study. The median age was 48 years (IQR, 33-59.5) and 69.4% were male. Overall, 28 patients (38.9%) required IMM/advanced therapies to treat PSC-IBD (22 biologic/small molecule therapy and six thiopurine monotherapy). Patients in the IMM/advanced therapies group were more likely to have small bowel involvement (32.1% vs. 4.6%; P = 0.002). In the IMM/advanced therapies group, clinical remission was achieved in 78.6% but endoscopic healing in only 50%. The rate of acute ascending cholangitis was 42.9% in the IMM/advanced therapies group compared with 31.8% in the non-IMM/advanced therapies group (P = 0.34).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, up to a third of patients with PSC-IBD required IMM/advanced therapies with only 50% of these patients achieving endoscopic healing. The use of IMM/advanced therapies was not associated with a higher risk of cholangitis, but larger studies are needed to investigate the risk with different classes of advanced therapies.

The microbiota and the gut-liver axis in primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) offers unique opportunities to explore the gut-liver axis owing to the close association between liver disease and colonic inflammation. It is well established that the gut microbiota in people with PSC differs from that of healthy individuals, but details of the microbial factors that demarcate PSC from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) without PSC are poorly understood. In this Review, we aim to provide an overview of the latest literature on the gut microbiome in PSC and PSC with IBD, critically examining hypotheses on how microorganisms could contribute to the pathogenesis of PSC. A particular emphasis will be put on pathogenic features of the gut microbiota that might explain the occurrence of bile duct inflammation and liver disease in the context of IBD, and we postulate the potential existence of a specific yet unknown factor related to the gut-liver axis as causative in PSC. Available data are scrutinized in the perspective of therapeutic approaches related to the gut-liver axis.

Increased Risk of Non-conventional and Invisible Dysplasias in Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease [termed PSC-IBD] have a higher risk of developing colorectal neoplasia than those with IBD alone. The mechanism by which concomitant PSC increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia remains unknown. Seven distinct non-conventional dysplastic subtypes have been recently described in IBD, including crypt cell dysplasia, hypermucinous dysplasia, goblet cell-deficient dysplasia, dysplasia with increased Paneth cell differentiation [DPD], sessile serrated lesion [SSL]-like dysplasia, traditional serrated adenoma [TSA]-like dysplasia, and serrated dysplasia, not otherwise specified [NOS]. Despite the lack of high-grade morphological features, crypt cell, hypermucinous, and goblet cell-deficient dysplasias often show molecular features characteristic of advanced neoplasia [i.e. aneuploidy and KRAS mutations] and are more frequently associated with advanced neoplasia than conventional dysplasia on follow-up. We aimed to characterise clinicopathological features of dysplasia found in PSC-IBD patients.

METHODS

A cohort of 173 PSC-IBD patients were analysed. All dysplastic lesions were subtyped as either conventional or non-conventional dysplasia. The clinicopathological features of PSC-IBD patients with neoplasia were also compared with those of non-PSC IBD patients with neoplasia.

RESULTS

There were 109 [63%] men and 64 [37%] women, with a mean age of 26 years at IBD diagnosis and a long history of IBD [mean duration: 14 years]. Ulcerative colitis was the most common IBD subtype [80%], and the majority of patients [92%] had a history of pancolitis. A total of 153 dysplastic lesions were detected in 54 [31%] patients, 35 [65%] of whom had multifocal dysplasia. One additional patient presented with colorectal cancer [CRC] without a history of dysplasia. Dysplasia was often non-conventional [n = 93; 61%], endoscopically/grossly invisible [n = 101; 66%], and right/proximal-sided [n = 90; 59%]. All seven non-conventional subtypes were identified, including 46 [30%] crypt cell dysplasia, 23 [15%] hypermucinous dysplasia, 12 [8%] goblet cell-deficient dysplasia, seven [5%] DPD, three [2%] TSA-like dysplasia, one [1%] SSL-like dysplasia, and one [1%] serrated dysplasia NOS. Follow-up information was available for 86 lesions, of which 32 [37%] were associated with subsequent detection of advanced neoplasia [high-grade dysplasia or CRC] within a mean follow-up time of 55 months. PSC-IBD patients with neoplasia were more likely to have pancolitis [98%, p = 0.039] and a longer IBD duration [mean: 17 years, p = 0.021] than those without neoplasia [89% and 12 years, respectively]. When compared with a cohort of non-PSC IBD patients with neoplasia, the PSC-IBD group with neoplasia was more often associated with non-conventional [61%, p <0.001], invisible [66%, p <0.001], and right/proximal-sided [59%, p = 0.045] dysplasias [vs 25%, 21%, and 47%, respectively, for the non-PSC IBD group]. The rate of advanced neoplasia was nearly 2-fold higher in the PSC-IBD group [37%] compared with the non-PSC IBD group [22%] [p = 0.035].

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly a third of PSC-IBD patients developed dysplasia, which is often associated with non-conventional dysplastic features, invisible endoscopic/gross appearance, right/proximal-sided colon, multifocality, and advanced neoplasia on follow-up. These findings underscore the importance of recognising these non-conventional subtypes by practising pathologists and the need for careful and frequent endoscopic surveillance, with random biopsies, in PSC-IBD patients.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on sclerosing cholangitis

Management of primary or secondary sclerosing cholangitis is challenging. These Clinical Practice Guidelines have been developed to provide practical guidance on debated topics including diagnostic methods, prognostic assessment, early detection of complications, optimal care pathways and therapeutic (pharmacological, endoscopic or surgical) options both in adults and children.

Analysis of the disease activity of ulcerative colitis with and without concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis: An investigation using a nationwide database in Japan

Aims

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a relatively common complication of ulcerative colitis (UC). Only a few studies have investigated the impact of PSC on the clinical course of UC, and their conclusions are contradictory. Therefore, we aimed to compare the disease activity of UC with and without PSC.

Methods and Results

We collected UC patient data using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database system in Japan and classified eligible admissions into two groups based on their diagnosis of either UC alone or UC associated with PSC. We then compared therapeutic details (medical treatment and surgery) between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and propensity score matching was also performed. The rates of systemic steroid injection and infliximab administration in patients with PSC were lower than those in patients without PSC (21% vs. 28%, P = 0.012, 9.6% vs. 16%, P = 0.01, respectively). The rates of surgery, colorectal cancer, duration of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality did not differ between the two groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that concomitant PSC was a clinical factor that reduced the odds of systemic steroid injection (odds ratio [OR] = 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.90, P = 0.008) and infliximab (OR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.32-0.74, P = 0.0008) administration.

Conclusion

UC patients with PSC might have less UC disease activity than those with UC alone.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes After Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

The optimal restorative surgical management of patients with concomitant diagnoses of primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis [PSC-UC] who require colectomy is controversial, given that patients may have an increased risk for pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA]. We aimed to compare rates of pouchitis and pouch failure among patients with and without PSC by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic search performed through August 18, 2020, identified 12 studies that compared the rates of pouchitis [n = 11] and/or pouch failure [n = 6] among patients with PSC-UC and UC alone. We then performed a meta-analysis using random effects modelling to estimate the odds of developing any episodes of pouchitis or pouch failure.

RESULTS

A total of 4108 patients underwent an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after proctocolectomy for UC. Of these, 3799 [92%] were performed for UC alone and 309 [8%] were performed for PSC-UC. In a meta-analysis of 11 studies, patients with PSC-UC compared with UC alone were significantly more likely to develop any pouchitis (63% vs 30%, odds ratio [OR] 4.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.86-6.18), chronic pouchitis [47% vs 15%, OR 6.37, 95% CI 3.41-11.9], and pouch failure [10% vs 7%, OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.08-3.17].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PSC-UC were more likely to experience pouchitis and pouch failure than patients with UC alone. The risks of inflammatory complications after IPAA must be weighed against the potential complications with other surgical procedures, and future studies comparing outcomes among these procedures may inform decision making in this population.

Systematic Review with Meta-analysis: The Impact of Co-occurring Immune-mediated Inflammatory Diseases on the Disease Course of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are at risk of developing a variety of other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). The influence of co-occurring IMIDs on the disease course of IBD remains unknown. The aim of this study was therefore to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of IMIDs on phenotypic presentation and outcome in patients with IBD.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched from their earliest records through December 2018 and updated in October 2019 for studies reporting proportions or ratios of IBD-related disease outcomes in patients with and without co-occurring IMIDs. Meta-analyses were performed to estimate summary proportions and risks of the main outcomes. PRISMA guidelines were used, and study quality was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 93 studies were identified, comprising 16,064 IBD patients with co-occurring IMIDs and 3,451,414 IBD patients without IMIDs. Patients with IBD and co-occurring IMIDs were at increased risk of having extensive colitis or pancolitis (risk ratio, 1.38; 95% Cl, 1.25-1.52; P < 0.01, I2 = 86%) and receiving IBD-related surgeries (risk ratio, 1.17; 95% Cl, 1.01-1.36; P = 0.03; I2 = 85%) compared with patients without IMIDs. Co-occurrence of IMIDs other than primary sclerosing cholangitis in patients with IBD was associated with an increased risk of receiving immunomodulators (risk ratio, 1.15; 95% Cl, 1.06-1.24; P < 0.01; I2 = 60%) and biologic therapies (risk ratio, 1.19; 95% Cl, 1.08-1.32; P < 0.01; I2 = 53%).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis found that the presence of co-occurring IMIDs influences the disease course of IBD, including an increased risk of surgery and its phenotypical expression.