Estrogenic Modulation of Retinal Sensitivity in Reproductive Female Túngara Frogs

The relationship between spectral signals and retinal sensitivity in dendrobatid frogs

Research on visually driven behavior in anurans has often focused on Dendrobatoidea, a clade with extensive variation in skin reflectance, which is perceived to range from cryptic to conspicuous coloration. Because these skin patterns are important in intraspecific and interspecific communication, we hypothesized that the visual spectral sensitivity of dendrobatids should vary with conspecific skin spectrum. We predicted that the physiological response of frog retinas would be tuned to portions of the visible light spectrum that match their body reflectance. Using wavelength-specific electroretinograms (ERGs; from 350-650 nm), spectrometer measurements, and color-calibrated photography of the skin, we compared retinal sensitivity and reflectance of two cryptic species (Allobates talamancae and Silverstoneia flotator), two intermediate species (Colostethus panamansis and Phyllobates lugubris), and two conspicuous aposematic species (Dendrobates tinctorius and Oophaga pumilio). Consistent with the matched filter hypothesis, the retinae of cryptic and intermediate species were sensitive across the spectrum, without evidence of spectral tuning to specific wavelengths, yielding low-threshold broadband sensitivity. In contrast, spectral tuning was found to be different between morphologically distinct populations of O. pumilio, where frogs exhibited retinal sensitivity better matching their morph's reflectance. This sensory specialization is particularly interesting given the rapid phenotypic divergence exhibited by this species and their behavioral preference for sympatric skin reflectances. Overall, this study suggests that retinal sensitivity is coevolving with reflective strategy and spectral reflectance in dendrobatids.

Female cichlids mate with novel androgen receptor mutant males that lack coloration

A key challenge in animal behavior is disentangling the social stimuli that drive conspecific behaviors. For some species, like teleost fish, putative sexual signaling cues are inextricably linked to others, making it difficult to parse the precise roles distinct signals play in driving conspecific behaviors. In the African cichlid Astatotilapia burtoni, males are either dominant or subordinate, wherein bright coloration, territoriality, and courtship behavior inextricably correlate positively with rank. Here, we leveraged androgen receptor (AR) mutant male A. burtoni that lack dominance-typical coloration but not behavior to isolate the role of male coloration in driving female mating behaviors in this species. We found in independent behavioral assays that females behave aggressively towards AR mutant but not WT males, yet still mated with both types of males. Females showed enhanced activation of esr2b + cells in the hypothalamus when housed with either mutant or WT males and this activation scaled with spawning activities. Therefore, there is not a simple relationship between male coloration and female mating behaviors in A. burtoni, suggesting independent sensory mechanisms converge on hypothalamic esr2b cells to coordinate behavioral output.

Endocrine Modulation of Sending and Receiving Signals in Context-Dependent Social Communication

Animal communication requires senders to transmit signals through the environment to conspecific receivers, which then leads to context-dependent behavioral decisions. Sending and receiving sensory information in social contexts, however, can be dramatically influenced by an individual’s internal state, particularly in species that cycle in and out of breeding or other physiological condition like nutritional state or social status. Modulatory substances like steroids, peptides, and biogenic amines can influence both the substrates used for sending social signals (e.g., motivation centers, sensorimotor pathways, and muscles) as well as the peripheral sensory organs and central neural circuitry involved in the reception of this information and subsequent execution of behavioral responses. This issue highlights research from neuroethologists on the topic of modulation of sending and receiving social signals and demonstrates that it can occur in both males and females, in different senses at both peripheral sensory organs and the brain, at different levels of biological organization, on different temporal scales, in various social contexts, and across many diverse vertebrate taxa. Modifying a signal produced by a sender or how that signal is perceived in a receiver provides flexibility in communication and has broad implications for influencing social decisions like mate choice, which ultimately affects reproductive fitness and species persistence. This phenomenon of modulators and internal physiological state impacting communication abilities is likely more widespread than currently realized and we hope this issue inspires others working on diverse systems to examine this topic from different perspectives. An integrative and comparative approach will advance discovery in this field and is needed to better understand how endocrine modulation contributes to sexual selection and the evolution of animal communication in general.