Does percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy increase the risk of pleural recurrence in patients with stage I lung cancer?

DNA image cytometry of bronchial washing as a diagnostic adjunct to radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided sampling of peripheral lung lesions: A single center prospective study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to study the adjunct role of combining DNA aneuploidy analysis with radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS)-guided sampling for diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions (PPLs).

METHOD

A single-center prospective study was conducted in patients undergoing R-EBUS-guided sampling for PPLs. DNA image cytometry (DNA-ICM) was used to analyze DNA aneuploidy in bronchial washing from the bronchial segment of the PPL. Clinical information, R-EBUS data, pathology, DNA-ICM results, and follow-up data were analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for R-EBUS-guided sampling, DNA-ICM, and the two methods combined were measured. Binary logistic regression was performed to determine influencing factors on diagnostic positivity rate. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff point for DNA-ICM.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients were enrolled. Sixty-four (63.4%) patients had confirmed malignant tumor, of whom 33 were confirmed by R-EBUS-guided sampling (biopsy and/or bronchial brush and wash cytology), and 31 by surgery or percutaneous lung biopsy. Thirty-seven patients were finally considered to have benign lesions, based on clinical information and 1-year follow-up. The sensitivity for malignant disease was 51.6% by R-EBUS, and specificity was 100%. DNA-ICM had a sensitivity of 67.2% and a specificity of 86.5%. When combining the two methods, sensitivity increased to 78.1% and specificity was 86.5%. Lesion size and whether the R-EBUS probe was located in the lesion were significantly associated with positivity rate of the combined methods. The optimal cutoff point for DNA-ICM was 5c for max DNA content, and 1 for aneuploid cell count (sensitivity 67.2%, specificity 86.5%, accuracy 63.4%).

CONCLUSION

In malignant PPLs, DNA-ICM combined with R-EBUS-guided sampling can improve diagnostic positivity compared with either method alone.

Effects of pre-operative biopsy on recurrence and survival in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients in China

Background

Whether pre-operative biopsy affects post-operative recurrence and metastasis of lung cancer patients is still controversial.

Methods

In order to clarify these disputes, we collected relevant literature to conduct a meta-analysis. To validate the results of the meta-analysis, we retrospectively analysed 575 patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection at our centre from 2010 to 2018 using propensity score matching and competing risk models.

Results

5509 lung cancer patients from 11 articles were included in the meta-analysis. Summary analysis showed that the total recurrence rate of the biopsy group was higher than that of the nonbiopsy group (risk ratio 1.690, 95% CI 1.220-2.330; p=0.001). After propensity score matching, we found that there was no significant correlation between biopsy and total recurrence (risk ratio 1.070, 95% CI 0.540-2.120; p=0.850). In our cohort, of 575 stage I lung adenocarcinomas, 113 (19.7%) patients underwent pre-operative biopsy. During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 71 (57-93) months, multivariable analyses showed pre-operative biopsy in the overall observation cohort (subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) 1.522, 95% CI 0.997-2.320; p=0.051) and in the propensity score-matched cohort (SHR 1.134, 95% CI 0.709-1.810; p=0.600) was not significantly correlated with the risk of recurrence and metastasis. Moreover, the pre-operative biopsy did not affect disease-free survival (SHR 0.853, 95% CI 0.572-1.273; p=0.438) or overall survival (SHR 0.647, 95% CI 0.352-1.189; p=0.161).

Conclusion

Pre-operative biopsy might not increase the risk of recurrence and metastasis, suggesting that these procedures might be safe for patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma whose diagnosis is difficult to determine before surgery.