Prognostic score for survival with pulmonary carcinoids: the importance of associating clinical with pathological characteristics

Absence of orthopaedia homeobox protein (OTP) expression is associated with disease spread and adverse outcome in pulmonary carcinoid tumour patients

Pulmonary carcinoid (PC) tumours typically have a good prognosis, although metastases occur, and the disease may progress after a long period of time. Expression of orthopaedia homeobox protein (OTP) has been recognized as a possible independent prognostic marker in PCs. Immunohistochemical (IHC) OTP expression has been associated with better prognosis, but the staining has yet to be implemented in routine clinical diagnostics. In response to this, two new monoclonal OTP antibodies were recently developed.This retrospective study included 164 PC patients operated on at Helsinki University Hospital between 1990 and 2020. Tissue microarray slides, prepared from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded primary tumour samples, were stained with OTP IHC using one polyclonal and two novel monoclonal antibodies.Absence of OTP expression was associated with a shorter disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease progression (p < 0.001). Patients without OTP expression had a 5-year DSS of 73-79%, whereas 5-year DSS was 91-94% with OTP expression, depending on the primary antibody. In a univariable Cox regression model, absence of OTP expression was associated with adverse outcome along with atypical histological subtype, metastatic disease, Ki-67 proliferation index > 1%, and larger tumour size. In a multivariable Cox regression model, only absence of OTP expression and lymph node involvement at the time of diagnosis were associated with risk of worse prognosis. All three antibodies showed good concordance with each other.Our findings support the role of OTP as an independent prognostic marker in PCs and applicability of IHC staining in routine clinical use with novel monoclonal antibodies.

Clinical efficacy of thermal ablation for the treatment of pulmonary carcinoid tumor: a propensity-matched analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy of thermal ablation in the treatment of pulmonary carcinoid (PC) tumor.

METHODS

Data of patients with inoperable PC diagnosed from 2000 to 2019 were obtained from the SEER database and analyzed according to different therapeutic modality: thermal ablation vs non-ablation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce intergroup differences. Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were used to compare intergroup differences of overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS). Cox proportional risk models were used to reveal prognostic factors.

RESULTS

After PSM, the thermal ablation group had better OS (p < .001) and LCSS (p < .001) than the non-ablation group. Subgroup analysis stratified by age, sex, histologic type and lymph node status subgroups showed similar survival profile. In the subgroup analysis stratified by tumor size, the thermal ablation group showed better OS and LCSS than those of the non-ablation group for tumors ≤3.0 cm, not statistically significant for tumors >3.0 cm. Subgroup analysis by M stage showed that thermal ablation was superior to non-ablation in OS and LCSS for patients with M0 stage, but no significant difference was found in subgroups with distant metastatic disease. Multivariate analysis showed that thermal ablation was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.25-0.46, p < .001) and LCSS (HR: 0.23, 95%CI: 0.12-0.43, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

For patients with inoperable PC, thermal ablation might be a potential treatment option, especially in M0-stage with tumor size ≤3 cm.

Lymphadenectomy for lung carcinoids: Which factors may predict nodal upstaging? A multi centric, retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate risk factors for nodal upstaging in patients with lung carcinoids and to understand which type of lymphadenectomy is most appropriate.

METHODS

Data regarding patients with lung carcinoids, who underwent surgical resection and lymphadenectomy in five institutions from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2019, were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and pathological tumor characteristics were correlated to analyze lymph node upstaging.

RESULTS

The analysis was conducted on 283 patients. Pathology showed 230 typical and 53 atypical carcinoids. Nodal and mediastinal upstaging occurred in 33 (11.6%) and 16 (5.6%) patients, respectively. At the univariable analysis, nodal upstaging was significantly correlated with central location (p = 0.003), atypical histology (p < 0.001), pT dimension (p = 0.004), and advanced age (p = 0.043). The multivariable analysis confirmed atypical histology (odds ratio [OR]: 11.030; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.837-25.153, p < 0.001) and central location (OR: 3.295; 95% CI: 1.440-7.540, p = 0.005) as independent prognostic factors for nodal upstaging. Atypical histology (p < 0.001), pT dimension (p = 0.036), number of harvested lymph node stations (p = 0.047), and type of lymphadenectomy (p < 0.001) correlated significantly with mediastinal upstaging. The multivariable analysis confirmed atypical histology (OR: 5.408; 95% CI: 1.391-21.020, p = 0.015) and pT (OR: 1.052; 95% CI: 1.021-1.084, p = 0.001) as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

Atypical histology, dimension, and central location are associated with a high-risk for occult hilo-mediastinal metastases, and mediastinal radical dissection may predict nodal upstaging. Thus, we suggest radical mediastinal lymph node dissection in high-risk tumors, reserving sampling, or lobe-specific dissection in peripheral, small typical carcinoids.

Prognostic significance of laterality in lung neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

Well-differentiated lung neuroendocrine tumors (Lu-NET) are classified as typical (TC) and atypical (AC) carcinoids, based on mitotic counts and necrosis. However, prognostic factors, other than tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage and the histopathological diagnosis, are still lacking. The current study is aimed to identify potential prognostic factors to better stratify lung NET, thus, improving patients' treatment strategy and follow-up.

METHODS

A multicentric retrospective study, including 300 Lung NET, all surgically removed, from Italian and Spanish Institutions.

RESULTS

Median age 61 years (13-86), 37.7% were males, 25.0% were AC, 42.0% were located in the lung left parenchyma, 80.3% presented a TNM stage I-II. Mitotic count was ≥2 per 10 high-power field (HPF) in 24.7%, necrosis in 13.0%. Median overall survival (OS) was 46.1 months (0.6-323), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 36.0 months (0.3-323). Female sex correlated with a more indolent disease (T1; N0; lower Ki67; lower mitotic count and the absence of necrosis). Left-sided primary tumors were associated with higher mitotic count and necrosis. At Cox-multivariate regression model, age, left-sided tumors, nodal (N) positive status and the diagnosis of AC resulted independent negative prognostic factors for PFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that laterality is an independent prognostic factors in Lu-NETs, with left tumors being less frequent but showing a worse prognosis than right ones. A wider spectrum of clinical and pathological prognostic factors, including TNM stage, age and laterality is suggested. These parameters could help clinicians to personalize the management of Lu-NET.

External Validation of a Prognostic Score for Survival in Lung Carcinoids

Background: A prognostic score including T-dimension, age, histology and lymph node ratio was previously proposed in absence of an external validation dataset. The aim of the current study was to validate the proposed prognostic score using an independent dataset. Methods: Data of patients with lung carcinoids, who underwent surgical resection and lymphadenectomy in five institutions from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. Two risk groups were created based on the following data: age, histology, node ratio and pT for disease-free survival (DFS); age, sex, node ratio and pT for overall survival (OS). The previously proposed score was validated, identifying two groups of patients: a high risk (HRG) and low risk (LRG) group. Results: The final analysis was conducted on 283 patients. Regarding DFS, 230 (81.3%) patients were assigned to the LRG and 53 (18.7%) to the HRG. Considering OS, 268 (94.7%) were allocated in the LRG and 15 (5.3%) in the HRG. The 5-year DFS was 92.7% in the LRG vs. 67% in the HRG (p < 0.001) while the 5-year OS was 93.6% in the LRG vs. 86.2% in the HRG (p = 0.29) with clear curve separation. Conclusion: Our analysis confirmed the validity of the composite score for DFS in lung carcinoids. Regarding OS, statistical significance was not reached because of a low number of deaths and patients in the HRG.

Long-term survival analysis of sublobar resection versus lobectomy for older patients with early-stage pulmonary carcinoid tumour: a database-based propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

The optimal extent of surgery for older patients with early-stage pulmonary carcinoid tumour (PC) remains controversial.

AIMS

To compare prognostic differences between sublobar resection versus lobectomy in older patients with early-stage PC.

METHODS

The SEER database was searched for stage T1N0M0 PC patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection from 2000 to 2017. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to determine intergroup covariate differences. Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were used for intergroup comparison of overall survival (OS). A Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate independent risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 1023 participants, 650 and 373 underwent lobectomy and sublobar resection, respectively. Before PSM, the 5- and 10-year OS in the sublobar resection group were lower than that of the lobectomy group (5-year OS 84.12% vs. 91.16%; 10-year OS 57.43% vs. 64.77%; p = 0.014); after PSM, no significant prognostic difference existed between lobectomy and sublobar resection (5-year OS 88.17% vs. 89.23%; 10-year OS 58.32% vs. 62.75%; p = 0.811). Subgroup analysis included tumour size, age, number of lymph nodes examined and histological type, and showed no statistically significant survival differences between the lobectomy and sublobar resection groups. Multivariable Cox analysis indicated that age ≥ 77 years, male sex, inadequate lymph node assessment (< 7), and atypical carcinoid were associated with reduced OS.

CONCLUSION

Sublobar resection showed a similar long-term survival rate for early-stage PC patients aged ≥ 65 years as with lobectomy, thereby providing a basis for the selection of surgical methods for PC.