Triport periareolar thoracoscopic surgery versus right minithoracotomy for repairing atrial septal defect in adults

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease has gained increasing acceptance within the specialty. However, most suitable candidates are still treated with a conventional median sternotomy. Adoption of minimally invasive techniques has proven essential in the surgical repair of acquired heart disease to increase patient satisfaction and to remain competitive in an ever-changing medical field. We herein summarize the currently available literature on minimally invasive congenital heart surgery. We describe available techniques and routes of access as well as the lesions amenable for minimally invasive repairs. Mainly derived from case series and smaller retrospective studies, we report available evidence on outcome, especially compared with conventional repairs through a median sternotomy. We highlight the unique challenges that arise from the wide range of lesions as well as from the spectrum of patients, ranging from infant to adulthood, and describe ways to mitigate those.

Minimally Invasive Surgical Repair of a Partial Atrioventricular Canal Defect in a 20-Year-Old Patient-A Case Report and Review of Literature

The association of an ostium primum-type defect with a cleft anterior mitral valve is known in the medical literature as the partial form of an atrioventricular canal. We present a case report about a 20-year-old woman with minimal symptomatology that discovered her pathology on routine echocardiography. Today, surgical operation remains the gold standard in such pathologies, especially mandatory when there is important valvular regurgitation and left-to-right shunt. Currently living in the era of fast and good cosmetic outcomes, minimally invasive and endovascular approaches should be developed and more often practiced. This scientific presentation is the first step in showing our department steps in performing minimally invasive surgeries as a routine.

Total Thoracoscopic versus Robotic Surgery for Repair of Atrial Septum Defect: A Propensity Matching Score Analysis

Robotic surgery can provide less surgical trauma than conventional surgery, but differences between robotic and thoracoscopic surgery for atrial septal defect (ASD) repair are not well documented. To explore whether ASD can be repaired by thoracoscopic surgery or robotic surgery, which procedure is less invasive, and the difference in outcomes between these two procedures, this article studies 160 patients undergoing ASD repair at our institution. Sixty-five patients underwent total thoracoscopic surgery and 95 patients underwent total endoscopic robotic surgery. Propensity score matching yielded 64 well-matched patient pairs. Surgical data and early postoperative outcomes between the two matched groups were analyzed and compared. The results show that thoracoscopic and robotic surgery to repair ASD are both safe and reliable, and the early curative effect is good. However, regardless of similar complication rates, robotic surgery has a shorter time, less postoperative drainage, and faster recovery than thoracoscopic surgery.