Risk factors for prolonged air leak and need for intervention following lung resection

Impact of the duration of corticosteroid treatment for postoperative acute lung injury following lung cancer surgery

Background

Acute lung injury (ALI) is one of the most serious pulmonary complications following lung resection. Despite the known beneficial effects of corticosteroid treatment for postoperative ALI, limited data are available regarding corticosteroid treatment duration. This study aimed to evaluate the beneficial effects of a short-course corticosteroid in patients with postoperative ALI following lung resection surgery for lung cancer.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included 91 patients who were treated with corticosteroids for postoperative ALI among 7,317 patients who underwent lung resection surgery for lung cancer between January 2017 and March 2021. Patients were divided into two groups, short (≤14 days, n=31) and long (≥15 days, n=60) courses, on the basis of corticosteroid treatment duration.

Results

While similar baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups, the short-course group had a higher corticosteroid loading dose than the long-course group; however, the cumulative dose in the first 7 days was not different between the two groups. Overall, in-hospital mortality rates were 3.2% and 26.7% in the short- and long-course groups, respectively (P=0.01). Moreover, the long-course group had higher additional intensive care unit (ICU) admission (32.3% vs. 60.0%, P=0.02) and persistent air leakage (0% vs. 13.3%, P=0.09). In the logistic regression analysis, corticosteroid treatment duration was marginally associated with in-hospital mortality [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 9.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-84.9, P=0.054].

Conclusions

Short-course corticosteroid treatment was associated with a lower rate of surgical site complications, additional ICU admission, and in-hospital mortality, which suggests the necessity of efforts for reducing the total duration by weighing the benefits and adverse effects of corticosteroid treatment for postoperative ALI.

The persistent problem of persistent air-leaks: approach to management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Persistent air leaks, defined as an air leak extending beyond 5 days, pose a significant challenge for cardiothoracic surgeons and pulmonologists. Although current guidelines advocate for surgical intervention as the primary treatment, many patients may not suitable candidates for immediate return to the operating room. Alternatively, conservative management, which involves watchful waiting for pleural healing, often results in prolonged hospital stays and increased morbidity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although current guidelines advocate for surgical intervention as the primary treatment, many patients may not suitable candidates for immediate return to the operating room. Alternatively, conservative management, which involves watchful waiting for pleural healing, often results in prolonged hospital stays and increased morbidity. For patients who are not surgical candidates, use of autologous blood patch, pleurodesis or endobronchial valves may offer a viable alternative to conservatively manage air leak.

SUMMARY

This review evaluates the various noninvasive therapies that have been explored, including sealants, Heimlich valves, chemical and autologous blood patch pleurodesis, and endo and intrabronchial valves. Although these alternatives show promise, further research is needed to compare these treatments before they can be recommended in new guidelines.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Expert Consensus Document on the Management of Pleural Drains After Pulmonary Lobectomy: Expert Consensus Document

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Workforce on Evidence-Based Surgery provides this document on management of pleural drains after pulmonary lobectomy. The goal of this consensus document is to provide guidance regarding pleural drains in 5 specific areas: (1) choice of drain, including size, type, and number; (2) management, including use of suction vs water seal and criteria for removal; (3) imaging recommendations, including the use of daily and postpull chest roentgenograms; (4) use of digital drainage systems; and (5) management of prolonged air leak. To formulate the consensus statements, a task force of 15 general thoracic surgeons was invited to review the existing literature on this topic. Consensus was obtained using a modified Delphi method consisting of 2 rounds of voting until 75% agreement on the statements was reached. A total of 13 consensus statements are provided to encourage standardization and stimulate additional research in this important area.

Clinical outcomes and staff satisfaction after adoption of digital chest drainage system for minimally invasive lung resections

Background

Digital chest drainage systems (DCDS) provide reliable pleural drainage while quantifying fluid output and air leak. However, the benefits of DCDS in the contemporary era of minimally invasive thoracic surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have not been fully investigated. Additionally, hospital and resident staff experiences after implementation of a DCDS have not been fully explored. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and hospital staff experience after adoption of a DCDS for minimally invasive lung resections.

Methods

A single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent minimally invasive lung resection (lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection) and received a DCDS from 11/1/2021 to 11/1/2022. DCDS patients were compared to sequential historical controls (3/1/2019-6/30/2021) who received a analog chest drainage system. For the analog system, chest tubes were removed when no bubbles were observed in the water seal compartment with Valsalva, cough, and in variable positions. With a DCDS, chest tubes were removed when the air leak was less than 30 cc/min for 8 hours, with no spikes. All patients followed an institutional ERAS protocol. Primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS) and chest tube duration. Hospital staff and residents were surveyed regarding their experience.

Results

One hundred and twenty-four patients received DCDS, and 248 received an analog chest drainage system. There was a reduction in mean LOS (3.6 vs. 4.4 days, P=0.01) and chest tube duration (2.7 vs. 3.6 days, P=0.03) in the DCDS group. Hospital staff (n=77, 46% response rate) reported the DCDS easier to use (60%, P<0.001) and easier to care for patients with (65%, P<0.001) compared to the analog system. Surgical residents (n=28, 56% response rate) reported increased confidence in interpretation of air leak (75%, P<0.001) and decision-making surrounding chest tube removal (79%, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Using a DCDS can reduce LOS and chest tube duration in the contemporary setting of minimally invasive lung resections and ERAS protocols. Increased confidence of resident decision-making for chest tube removal may contribute to improved outcomes.

Zero-leak prediction during major lung resection aiming for minimal chest drainage duration: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Early chest tube removal should be considered to enhance recovery after surgery. The current study aimed to provide a predictive algorithm for air leak episodes (ALE) and to create a knowledge base for early chest tube removal.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent thoracoscopic anatomical pulmonary resections in our unit. We defined ALE as any airflow ≥ 10 mL/min recorded in the follow-up charts based on the digital thoracic drainage device. Multivariate regression analysis was used to control for preoperative and intraoperative confounding factors. The ALE prediction algorithm was constructed by combining an additive ALE risk-scoring system using the coefficients of the significant predictive factors with the intraoperative water-sealing test.

RESULTS

In 485 consecutive thoracoscopic major pulmonary resections, ALE developed in 209 (43%) patients. Statistically significant ALE-associated preoperative factors included male sex, lower body mass index, radiologically evident emphysema, lobectomy, and upper lobe surgery. Significant ALE-associated intraoperative factors were incomplete fissure and pleural adhesion. The ALE risk scoring demonstrated an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.72 in the fivefold cross-validation test. The ALE prediction algorithm correctly predicted ALE-absent patients at a negative predictive value of 80%.

CONCLUSIONS

The algorithm may promote the optimization of the chest tube-dwelling duration by identifying potential ALE-absent patients for accelerated tube removal.

Suitable Patient Selection and Optimal Timing of Treatment for Persistent Air Leak after Lung Resection

OBJECTIVES

The choice of therapeutic intervention for postoperative air leak varies between institutions. We aimed to identify the optimal timing and patient criteria for therapeutic intervention in cases of postoperative air leaks after lung resection.

METHODS

This study utilized data from a prospective multicenter observational study conducted in 2019. Among the 2187 cases in the database, 420 cases with air leaks on postoperative day 1 were identified. The intervention group underwent therapeutic interventions, such as pleurodesis or surgery, while the observation group was monitored without intervention. A comparison between the intervention group and the observation group were analyzed using the cumulative distribution and hazard functions.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (11.0%) were included in the intervention group. The multivariate analysis revealed that low body mass index (p = 0.019), partial resection (p = 0.010), intraoperative use of fibrin glue (p = 0.008), severe air leak on postoperative day 1 (p < 0.001), and high forced expiratory volume in 1 s (p = 0.021) were significant predictors of the requirement for intervention. The proportion of patients with persistent air leak in the observation group was 20% on postoperative day 5 and 94% on postoperative day 7. The hazard of air leak cessation peaked from postoperative day 3 to postoperative day 7.

CONCLUSIONS

This research contributes valuable insights into predicting therapeutic interventions for postoperative air leaks and identifies scenarios where spontaneous cessation is probable. A validation through prospective studies is warranted to affirm these findings.

Perioperative outcomes of bi-pigtail catheter drainage strategy versus conventional chest tube after uniportal video-assisted thoracic lung surgery

OBJECTIVES

Chest tube (CT) drainage is a main cause of postoperative pain in lung surgery. Here, we introduced a novel drainage strategy with bi-pigtail catheters (PCs) and conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare with conventional CT drainage after uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery lung surgery.

METHODS

A single-centre, prospective, open-labelled, randomized controlled trial (ChiCTR2000035337) was conducted with a preplanned sample size of 396. The primary outcome was the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included other indicators of postoperative pain, drainage volume, duration of drainage, postoperative hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, CT reinsertion and medical costs.

RESULTS

A total number of 396 patients were randomized between August 2020 and January 2021, 387 of whom were included in the final analysis. The baseline and clinical characteristics of the patients were well balanced between 2 groups. The NPRS on the first postoperative day was significantly lower in the PC group than in the CT group (2.40 ± 1.27 vs 3.02 ± 1.39, p < 0.001), as well as the second/third-day NPRS, the incidence of sudden severe pain (9/192, 4.7% vs 34/195, 17.4%, P < 0.001) and pain requiring intervention (19/192, 9.9% vs 46/195, 23.6%, P < 0.001). In addition, the medical cost in the PC group was lower (US$7809 ± 1646 vs US$8205 ± 1815, P = 0.025). Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed that the drainage strategy was the only factor influencing the incidence of pain requiring intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The drainage strategy with bi-PCs in patients undergoing uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery lung surgery alleviates postoperative pain with adequate safety and efficacy.

Autologous mesenchymal stromal cells embedded with Tissucol Duo® for prevention of air leak after anatomical lung resection: results of a prospective phase I/II clinical trial with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Prolonged air leak (PAL) is the most frequent complication after pulmonary resection. Several measures have been described to prevent the occurrence of PAL in high-risk patients, however, the potential role of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) applied in the parenchymal suture line to prevent postoperative air leak in this setting has not been fully addressed.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the feasibility, safety and potential clinical efficacy of the implantation of autologous MSCs embedded in Tissucol Duo® as a prophylactic alternative to prevent postoperative prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection in high-risk patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Phase I/II single-arm prospective clinical trial.

METHODS

Six patients with high risk of PAL undergoing elective pulmonary resection were included. Autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs were expanded at our Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) Facility and implanted (embedded in a Tissucol Duo® carrier) in the parenchymal suture line during pulmonary resection surgery. Patients were monitored in the early postoperative period and evaluated for possible complications or adverse reactions. In addition, all patients were followed-up to 5 years for clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The median age of patients included was 66 years (range: 55-70 years), and male/female ratio was 5/1. Autologous MSCs were expanded in five cases, in one case MSCs expansion was insufficient. There were no adverse effects related to cell implantation. Regarding efficacy, median air leak duration was 0 days (range: 0-2 days). The incidence of PAL was nil. Radiologically, only one patient presented pneumothorax in the chest X-ray at discharge. No adverse effects related to the procedure were recorded during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of autologous MSCs for prevention of PAL in patients with high risk of PAL is feasible, safe and potentially effective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NO

EudraCT: 2013-000535-27.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov idenfier: NCT02045745.

Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A propensity score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The existing literature on perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung lobectomy is inconclusive.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of VATS and RATS lobectomy procedures for patients with non-small cell lung cancer to compare the short-term perioperative outcomes by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 418 patients were enrolled in this study. After PSM, 71 patients each received VATS and RATS lobectomy for further analysis. RATS lobectomy was associated with a lower rate of conversion to thoracotomy (0% vs. 5.63%, p = 0.006), a lower rate of postoperative prolonged air leak (1.14% vs. 19.72%, p = 0.001) and a shorter duration of postoperative chest tube drainage (3 days interquartile range [IQR: 3, 4] vs. 4 days IQR [3-5], p = 0.027). Subgroup analysis indicated that after acquiring proficiency in the RATS procedure, its disadvantages diminished while its advantages were enhanced. In terms of rate of conversion to thoracotomy, length of hospital stays, and duration of postoperative chest tube drainage, RATS was comparable to uniportal VATS and superior to triportal VATS.

CONCLUSION

RATS has advantages over VATS in terms of early chest tube removal, early discharge, lower thoracotomy rate, less postoperative air leak, and a potential trend of more lymph node dissection numbers. These advantages are more pronounced after acquiring proficiency in RATS.

Repeated Pulmonary Metastasectomy: Third Operations and Beyond

BACKGROUND

For extrathoracic malignant neoplasms that have metastasized to the lungs, previous investigations have demonstrated both oncologic and survival benefits after pulmonary and repeated metastasectomy. Little is known about the feasibility of incrementally increasing numbers of subsequent metastasectomy procedures.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent ≥3 pulmonary resection procedures for recurrent, metachronous metastatic disease of nonlung primary malignant neoplasms at a single institution between 1992 and 2020. Primary outcomes collected pertained to safety and feasibility, including estimated blood loss (EBL), hospital length of stay, and details of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There were 117 patients who met inclusion criteria, having undergone at least 3 metastasectomy operations, with 55 (47.1%) undergoing a fourth operation and 20 (17.1%) undergoing a fifth operation. EBL did not differ between first and second operations (106.6 mL vs 102.5 mL; P = .76). It was, however, significantly greater at third operations (102.5 mL vs 238.7 mL; P = .000016). We noted an increase in wound complications between the second and third operations (0.9% vs 6.8%; P = .02) and incremental increases in likelihood of prolonged air leak with each subsequent operation. The need for reoperation was low for all and similar between operations. Importantly, hospital length of stay was similar for all procedures, as were the frequencies of hospital readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Third-time redo pulmonary metastasectomy can be performed safely and feasibly in select patients. Further repeated resection should remain a therapeutic option for patients, although risks for potentially longer operating time, greater EBL, and prolonged air leaks may be anticipated.