Long-term follow-up of thoracoscopic ablation in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation in minimally invasive cardiac surgery

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in cardiac surgery effectively restores sinus rhythm and may reduce morbidity and mortality. Cardiac surgery has witnessed the transition from the historical Cox Maze procedure to more modern and less invasive approaches for concomitant AF treatment. As minimally invasive cardiac surgery gains traction, ablation methods and careful patient selection become crucial to optimize results. Emerging techniques, including bipolar epicardial radiofrequency and endo/epicardial cryoablation, are central to these advances, targeting specific arrhythmogenic areas within the atria. While pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is essential, it may be insufficient for patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF. In such cases, left atrial posterior wall isolation has proven beneficial. Furthermore, recent studies emphasize the significance of left atrial appendage occlusion in concurrent AF treatments, highlighting its role in stroke risk reduction. Notably, the left atrium remains the focal point for concomitant AF surgery over the right, primarily due to concerns like high pacemaker implantation rates and complexities of right atrial ablation sets. Although guidelines support its widespread use, concomitant AF ablation outcomes vary based on patient selection, surgeon's expertise, and clinical context and thus the Heart Team's input is crucial for individualized decisions. In the upcoming sections, we present our patient selection and a visual guide to our techniques for concomitant AF surgery in minimally invasive mitral valve, coronary artery bypass and aortic valve surgery.

The first experience of a hybrid approach in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice and is associated with an increased risk of death, progression of heart failure, and the development of cardiogenic thromboemboli. Despite the significant success in the management of AF in the paroxysmal form, the results of the treatment for patients with persistent forms of AF remain unsatisfactory. Though the surgical approach provides higher rates of efficiency regarding the restoration of a sinus rhythm, transmural lesions are not always attainable, as a result, the rate of AF recurrence in the long-term period remains fairly high. It is also impossible to create ablative patterns to the mitral and tricuspid valves during thoracoscopic epicardial ablation, which can cause the development of recurrent AF, perimitral and typical atrial flutter. Therefore, the development of hybrid approaches combining the advantages of catheter and thoracoscopic techniques is an urgent task of contemporary surgical and interventional arrhythmology. Aims: to estimate the immediate results of a hybrid approach in the management of patients with persistent AF. Methods: We report the first experience of a hybrid treatment of patients with persistent AF. 6 patients aged 53-64 years (1 female, 5 males) were included in the study. At the first stage, thoracoscopic epicardial bipolar ablation was performed (modified GALAXY protocol); the second stage (in 3 to 6 months after the thoracoscopic stage) included an intracardiac electrophysiological study with three-dimensional endocardial mapping followed by endocardial ablation. Results: The thoracoscopic stage of the hybrid treatment included ablation according to the box lesion scheme using a bipolar irrigation equipment. No lethal outcomes and severe, life-threatening complications were registered. The duration of the inpatient period was 510 hospital-days. The 2nd stage of the hybrid treatment was limited to intracardiac electrophysiological examination only in 2 patients. In 4 patients, epicardial radiofrequency ablation was complemented by endocardial radiofrequency exposure. In 3 of the 4 patients who underwent endocardial radiofrequency ablation, catheter ablation of the mitral and cavotricuspid isthmus was required because of the induction of perimitral and typical flutter, respectively. After the 2nd stage of the hybrid treatment, at the time of discharge all the patients maintained a stable sinus rhythm. There were no severe complications or lethal outcomes. Conclusion: a hybrid approach in the AF management is a safe and effective method of treatment, which combines the advantages of minimally invasive surgery and endocardial intervention in patients with persistent AF. The technique is safe and has acceptable short-term results.