OUP accepted manuscript

Postoperative pulmonary function of patients with lung cancer and interstitial lung abnormalities

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the impact of radiological interstitial lung abnormalities on the postoperative pulmonary functions of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

A total of 1191 patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lung resections and pulmonary function tests ≥ 6 months postoperatively were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative pulmonary function reduction rates were compared between patients with and without interstitial lung abnormalities and according to the radiological interstitial lung abnormality classifications. Surgical procedures were divided into wedge resection, 1-2 segment resection, and 3-5 segment resection groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences in postoperative pulmonary function reduction rates 6 months after wedge resection were observed between the interstitial lung abnormality [n = 202] and non-interstitial lung abnormality groups [n = 989] [vital capacity [VC]: 6.82% vs. 5.00%; forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]: 7.05% vs. 7.14%]. After anatomical resection, these values were significantly lower in the interstitial lung abnormality group than in the non-interstitial lung abnormality group [VC: 1-2 segments, 12.50% vs. 9.93%; 3-5 segments, 17.42% vs. 14.23%; FEV1: 1-2 segments: 13.36% vs. 10.27%; 3-5 segments: 17.36% vs. 14.39%]. No significant differences in postoperative pulmonary function reduction rates according to the radiological interstitial lung abnormality classifications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of interstitial lung abnormalities had a minimal effect on postoperative pulmonary functions after wedge resections; however, pulmonary functions significantly worsened after segmentectomy or lobectomy, regardless of the radiological interstitial lung abnormality classification in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Clinical Significance of Preserving Pulmonary Function After Lung Resection in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

To determine the association between changes in pulmonary function before and after surgery, and the subsequent prognosis, of patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A total of 485 patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy for NSCLC with whole tumor size ≤2 cm and clinical stage IA at 2 institutions were retrospectively reviewed. The relationship between the postoperative reduction rate in vital capacity (VC), forced vital capacity (FVC), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and overall survival (OS) was investigated. OS determined the cut-off value of the reduction rate, according to the reduction rate of every 10% in pulmonary function.

RESULTS

Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that a reduction rate in VC at 12 months postoperatively was an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.07; P < .001) but those in FVC and FEV1 were not. OS was classified into good and poor with 20% reduction rate in VC. OS and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in a higher than 20% reduction rate in VC were worse than those in ≤20% reduction rate in VC (5 year-OS; 82.0% vs. 93.4%; P = .0004. Five year-RFS; 80.3% vs. 89.8%; P = .0018, respectively). Multivariable logistic analysis showed that lobectomy was a risk factor for the higher than 20% reduction rate in VC (odds ratio, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.01-2.56; P = .045).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative decrease in VC was significantly associated with the prognosis. Preserving pulmonary function is important for survival of patients with early-stage NSCLC.

Longitudinal changes in the volume of residual lung lobes after lobectomy for lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

It is unclear how the residual lobe volume changes over time after lobectomy. This study aims to clarify the temporal patterns of volume changes in each remaining lung lobe post-lobectomy. A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent lobectomy for lung cancer at Yueyang Central Hospital from January to December 2021. Lung CT images were reconstructed in three dimensions to calculate the volumes of each lung lobe preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. A total of 182 patients were included. Postoperatively, the median total lung volume change rates relative to preoperative values were -20.1%, -9.3%, and -5.9% at 1, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Except for the right middle lobe in patients who underwent right upper lobectomy, the volumes of individual lung lobes exceeded preoperative values. The volume growth of the lung on the side of the resection was significantly more than that of the lung on the opposite side. For left lobectomy patients, the right lower lobe's volume change rate exceeded that of the right upper and middle lobes. Among right lobectomy patients, the left lower lobe and the relatively inferior lobe of right lung had higher volume change rates than the superior one. Right middle lobe change rate was more in patients with right lower lobectomy than right upper lobectomy. Six months postoperatively, FEV1% and right middle lobectomy were positively correlated with the overall volume change rate. One year postoperatively, only age was negatively correlated with the overall volume change rate. 75 patients had pulmonary function tests. Postoperative FEV1 change linearly correlated with 1-year lung volume change rate, but not with theoretical total lung volume change rate or segmental method calculated FEV1 change. Time-dependent compensatory volume changes occur in remaining lung lobe post-lobectomy, with stronger compensation observed in the relatively inferior lobe compared to the superior one(s). Preoperative lung function and age may affect compensation level.

Sublobar Resection for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Octogenarians: A Prospective, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Segmentectomy is a good surgical option for peripheral, early, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤2 cm. However, the role of sublobar resection including wedge resection and segmentectomy remains unclear for octogenarians with >2-cm but ≤4-cm early-stage NSCLC, for which lobectomy is a standard treatment.

METHODS

By use of a prospective registry, 892 patients aged ≥80 years with operable lung cancer were enrolled at 82 institutions. Of these, we analyzed the clinicopathologic findings and surgical outcomes of 419 patients with NSCLC tumors of 2 to 4 cm during a median follow-up of 50.9 months between April 2015 and December 2016.

RESULTS

Five-year overall survival (OS) was slightly but not significantly worse after sublobar resection than after lobectomy in the entire cohort (54.7% [95% CI, 43.2%-93.0%] vs 66.8% [95% CI, 60.8%-72.1%]; P = .09). Multivariable Cox regression analysis of OS revealed that these surgical procedures were not independent prognostic predictors (hazard ratio, 0.8 [0.5-1.1]; P = .16). The 5-year OS was comparable between 192 patients who could tolerate lobectomy but were treated by sublobar resection or lobectomy (67.5% [95% CI, 48.8%-80.6%] vs 71.5% [95% CI, 62.9%-78.4%]; P = .79). Recurrence after sublobar resection and lobectomy was locoregional in 11 (11%) of 97 and in 23 (7%) of 322 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

OS might be equivalent between sublobar resection with a secure surgical margin and lobectomy for selected patients aged ≥80 years with peripheral early-stage NSCLC tumors of 2 to 4 cm who can tolerate lobectomy.

Rapid Recovery of Postoperative Pulmonary Function in Patients With Lung Cancer and Influencing Factors

Among malignant tumors, lung cancer has the highest morbidity and mortality worldwide. Surgery is the first-line treatment for early-stage lung cancers, and has gradually advanced from conventional open-chest surgery to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Additionally, increasingly smaller surgical incisions and less surgical trauma have resulted in reduced pulmonary function damage. Previous studies have found that the level of pulmonary function loss and recovery is significantly correlated with postoperative complications and the quality of life. Thus, an accurate assessment of the preoperative pulmonary function and effective rehabilitation of postoperative pulmonary function are highly important for patients undergoing lung surgery. In addition, pulmonary function assessment after pulmonary rehabilitation serves as an objective indicator of the postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation status and is crucial to facilitating pulmonary function recovery. Furthermore, a complete preoperative assessment and effective rehabilitation are especially critical in elderly patients with pulmonary tumors, poor basic physiological functions, comorbid lung diseases, and other underlying diseases. In this review, we summarize the clinical significance of pulmonary function assessment in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery, postoperative changes in pulmonary function, effective pulmonary function rehabilitation, and the influencing factors of pulmonary function rehabilitation.