Oncologic outcomes of segmentectomy for stage IA radiological solid-predominant lung cancer >2 cm in maximum tumour size

Survival and pulmonary function in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer after sublobar resection versus lobectomy: An updated meta-analysis

Traditionally, lobectomy was standard for stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent RCTs suggest sublobar resection's comparable outcomes. Our meta-analysis, incorporating 30 studies (including four RCTs), assessed sublobar resection's efficacy. Employing a random-effects model and I2 statistics for heterogeneity, we found sublobar resection reduced DFS (HR 1.31, p < 0.01) and OS (HR 1.27, p < 0.01) overall. However, RCT subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in DFS (p = 0.28) or OS (p = 0.62). Sublobar resection is a viable option for well-selected patients.

Comparison of segmentectomy and wedge resection for cT1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Sublobar resection is considered a standard surgical procedure for early non-small cell lung cancer, although the survival of patients undergoing sublobar resection for clinical T1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to compare survival between segmentectomy and wedge resection for clinical T1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who had undergone curative surgery for cT1cN0M0 stage IA3 non-small cell lung cancer. The overall and recurrence-free survival rates of 91 patients who underwent segmentectomy or wedge resection were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine (42.9%) and 52 patients (57.1%) were included in the segmentectomy and wedge resection groups, respectively. The median length of follow-up was 6.0 years (95% confidence interval 4.2 - - years) (Kaplan-Meier estimate). The 5 year overall survival rates were not significantly different between the segmentectomy and wedge resection groups (67.7% vs 52.0%, P = 0.132). The 5 year recurrence-free survival rate was worse in the wedge resection group than in the segmentectomy group (66.6% vs 46.9%, P = 0.047). In univariable analysis, spread through air spaces (hazard ratio, 5.889; 95% confidence interval, 2.357-14.715; P < 0.001) was an important prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival in the wedge resection group.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall survival of patients who underwent segmentectomy for clinical T1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer was not significantly different from that of patients who underwent wedge resection. However, patients with cT1cN0M0 non-small cell lung cancer who underwent wedge resection tended to have a worse recurrence-free survival prognosis than those who underwent segmentectomy.

Long-term outcomes and risk factors for recurrence after lung segmentectomy

OBJECTIVES

The long-term oncological outcomes and risk factors for recurrence after lung segmentectomy are unclear. The aims of this study were to investigate the long-term prognosis and to evaluate risk factors for recurrence after segmentectomy.

METHODS

Between January 2008 and December 2012, a total of 177 patients underwent segmentectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. The median follow-up period was 120.1 months. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival curves were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method with a log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify significant factors that predicted recurrence.

RESULTS

The study included 177 patients with a median age of 67 years. The median operative time was 155 min. No 30-day deaths were observed. Nine patients (5.1%) had recurrences: loco-regional in 3, distant in 3 and both in 3. The 5-year and 10-year recurrence-free survival rates were 89.7% and 79.8%, and the OS rates were 90.9% and 80.4%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the risk factor associated with recurrence was a pure solid tumour [hazard ratio, 23.151; 95% confidence interval 2.575-208.178; P = 0.005]. The non-pure solid tumour group had a significantly better probability of survival (5-year OS: 95.4% vs 77.2%; 10-year OS: 86.5% vs 61.8%; P < 0.0001). A total of 113 patients received preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Patients with a higher maximum standardized uptake value had a significantly higher recurrence rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Segmentectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer produced acceptable long-term outcomes. Pure solid radiographic appearance was associated with recurrence and decreased survival.

Clinical Utility of a CT-based AI Prognostic Model for Segmentectomy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background Currently, no tool exists for risk stratification in patients undergoing segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Purpose To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) prognostic model using preoperative CT scans and clinical and radiologic information for risk stratification in patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC undergoing segmentectomy. Materials and Methods In this single-center retrospective study, transfer learning of a pretrained model was performed for survival prediction in patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC who underwent lobectomy from January 2008 to March 2017. The internal set was divided into training, validation, and testing sets based on the assignments from the pretraining set. The model was tested on an independent test set of patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC who underwent segmentectomy from January 2010 to December 2017. Its prognostic performance was analyzed using the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for freedom from recurrence (FFR) at 2 and 4 years and lung cancer-specific survival and overall survival at 4 and 6 years. The model sensitivity and specificity were compared with those of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) eligibility criteria for sublobar resection. Results The pretraining set included 1756 patients. Transfer learning was performed in an internal set of 730 patients (median age, 63 years [IQR, 56-70 years]; 366 male), and the segmentectomy test set included 222 patients (median age, 65 years [IQR, 58-71 years]; 114 male). The model performance for 2-year FFR was as follows: AUC, 0.86 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.96); sensitivity, 87.4% (7.17 of 8.21 patients; 95% CI: 59.4, 100); and specificity, 66.7% (136 of 204 patients; 95% CI: 60.2, 72.8). The model showed higher sensitivity for FFR than the JCOG criteria (87.4% vs 37.6% [3.08 of 8.21 patients], P = .02), with similar specificity. Conclusion The CT-based DL model identified patients at high risk among those with clinical stage IA NSCLC who underwent segmentectomy, outperforming the JCOG criteria. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Differential efficacy of segmentectomy and wedge resection in sublobar resection compared to lobectomy for solid-dominant stage IA lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, the impact of sublobar resection versus lobectomy on the prognosis of solid-dominant stage IA lung cancer is contradictory in different studies, which requires further exploration.

METHODS

The authors analyzed 26 studies, including one randomized controlled trial and retrospective cohort studies. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed-effects or random-effects models based on heterogeneity levels.

RESULTS

The analysis included 12 667 patients, with 3488 undergoing sublobar resections and 9179 receiving lobectomies. The overall analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) (HR=1.28, 95% CI: 0.98-1.69) between sublobar resection and lobectomy, but lobectomy was associated with better recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR=1.39, 95% CI: 1.10-1.75). Subgroup analyses revealed that, for tumors with a diameter ≤2 cm, sublobar resection versus lobectomy showed no significant difference in OS but sublobar resection had lower RFS. For 2-3 cm tumors, both OS and RFS were significantly lower in the sublobar resection group. When consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) ranged from 0.5 to <1, OS did not differ significantly, but RFS was significantly lower in sublobar resection. Lung cancers with CTR=1 showed significantly lower OS and RFS in the sublobar resection group. Segmentectomy provided similar OS and RFS compared to lobectomy, while wedge resection had a detrimental effect on patient prognosis. However, wedge resection may have provided comparable outcomes for patients aged 75 years or older.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that segmentectomy and lobectomy yield similar oncological outcomes. However, compared to lobectomy, wedge resection is associated with a poorer prognosis. Nevertheless, for elderly patients, wedge resection is also a reasonable surgical option.

Oncologic outcomes of segmentectomy versus lobectomy for clinical T1c radiological pure-solid non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the outcomes of segmentectomy with those of lobectomy in T1c (>2-3 cm) radiological pure-solid non-small-cell lung cancer detected on thin-section computed tomography.

METHODS

This retrospective review compared the survival outcomes, causes of death and recurrence patterns between the segmentectomy and lobectomy in patients with c-T1cN0M0 radiological pure-solid non-small-cell lung cancer. Multivariable analysis was performed to control for confounders of survival. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in cumulative incidence of recurrence between groups were assessed using the methods of Gray.

RESULTS

Of the 426 patients, lobectomy was performed in 381 patients and segmentectomy in 45 patients. Nodal metastasis was noted in 104 (24.4%) patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that lobectomy was an independent prognosticator of better OS (hazard ratio 0.596, 95% confidence interval 0.366-0.969; P = 0.037). Lobectomy arm showed favourable 5-year OS and recurrence-free survival (OS: 72.9% vs 59.7%, log-rank test P = 0.007; recurrence-free survival: 64.4% vs 48.7%, P = 0.034) (median follow-up: 53 months). Approximately 14% of the patients in the lobectomy group and 27% in the segmentectomy group died of lung cancer. Furthermore, 5-year cumulative incidence of loco-regional recurrence rate was significantly higher in the segmentectomy group (35.5% vs 15.8%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In T1c radiological pure-solid non-small-cell lung cancer, segmentectomy was significantly associated with worse survival and insufficient loco-regional cancer control. Lobectomy remains the standard surgical treatment; meanwhile, segmentectomy should be applied with great caution.

Segmentectomy for cancer control in radiologically pure-solid clinical stage IA3 lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare cancer control after segmentectomy and lobectomy in patients with radiologically pure-solid clinical stage IA3 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with radiologically pure-solid clinical stage IA3 NSCLC who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy at 3 institutions between 2010 and 2019 were identified. We estimated propensity scores to adjust for confounding variables regarding tumour malignancy, including age, sex, smoking history, tumour size, maximum standardized uptake value on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, lymph node dissection, histological type and lymphatic, vascular and pleural invasion. Cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) was evaluated as a primary end point.

RESULTS

Among 412 patients, postoperative recurrence occurred in 7 of 44 patients (15.9%) undergoing segmentectomy, and 71 of 368 patients (19.3%) undergoing lobectomy. CIR was comparable between patients undergoing segmentectomy (5-year rate, 21.9%) and those undergoing lobectomy (5-year rate, 20.8%; P = 0.88). Locoregional recurrence did not differ between patients undergoing segmentectomy (6.8%) and those undergoing lobectomy (9.0%). In multivariable analysis, segmentectomy (versus lobectomy) was not identified as an independent prognostic factor for CIR (hazard ratio, 1.045; 95% confidence interval, 0.475-2.298; P = 0.91). In propensity score matching of 40 pairs, CIR was not significantly different between patients undergoing segmentectomy (5-year rate, 20.7%) and those undergoing lobectomy (5-year rate, 18.4%; P = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer control may be comparable between segmentectomy and lobectomy in patients with radiologically pure-solid clinical stage IA3 NSCLC. Further studies are warranted to clarify the survival benefits of segmentectomy in these patients.

Results of intention-to-treat pulmonary metastasectomies in northern Finland revealing significant number of new lung primary carcinomas: time to move on from wedge resections?

Background

A considerable proportion of intended pulmonary metastasectomies is known to turn out as new incidental primary lung cancers in final pathology. We aimed to analyse the trends and results of pulmonary metastasectomies using the intention-to-treat approach with an emphasis on final histopathological findings.

Methods

All intention-to-treat pulmonary metastasectomies performed in Oulu University Hospital between 2000 and 2020 were included in the study. Long term survival was analysed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate odds ratios for incidental primary lung cancer in final histology.

Results

A total of 154 intended pulmonary metastasectomies were performed to 127 individual patients. There was an increasing trend in pulmonary metastasectomies during the study period. Despite the increasing trend in comorbidities of the operated patients, the length of hospital stays decreased, and the postoperative complication rates remained stable. In final pathology reports, 9.7% were new primary lung cancers and 13.0% were benign nodules. A long disease-free interval (≥24 months) and smoking history were associated with incidental primary lung cancer in final histology. The short-term 30- and 90-day mortalities after pulmonary metastasectomy were 0.7%. The 5-year survival after pulmonary metastasectomy from all histologies was 52.8%, and from colorectal cancer metastasectomies (n=34) it was 73.5%.

Conclusions

The significant amount of new primary lung cancer lesions in pulmonary metastasectomy specimens highlight the diagnostic importance of pulmonary metastasectomy. A segmentectomy could be considered as a primary procedure in pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with a long disease-free interval and a heavy smoking history.

Lung Segmentectomy in NSCLC Surgery

Current guidelines recommend surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The standard treatment for patients with cT1N0 NSCLC has been lobectomy with lymph-node dissection, with sublobar resection used only in patients with inadequate cardio-respiratory reserve, with poor performance status, or who are elderly. In 1995, the Lung Cancer Study Group published the results of a randomized, prospective trial demonstrating the superiority of lobectomy compared with sublobar resection. From then on, wedge resection and segmentectomy were reserved exclusively for patients with poor functional reserve who could not tolerate lobectomy. Therefore, the exact role of segmentectomy has been controversial over the past 20 years. Recently, the randomized controlled trial JCOG0802/WJOG4607L demonstrated that segmentectomy was superior to lobectomy in patients with stage IA NSCLC (<2 cm and CTR < 0.5) in terms of both overall-survival and post-operative lung function. Based on these results, segmentectomy should be considered the standard surgical procedure for this patient group. In 2023, the randomized phase III CALGB 140503 (Alliance) trial demonstrated the efficacy and non-inferiority of sublobar resection, including wedge resection, for clinical stage IA NSCLC with tumor diameter of < 2 cm. This article is a narrative review of the current role of segmentectomy in lung cancer treatment and summarizes the most relevant studies in this context.