Liberal use of axillary artery cannulation for aortic and complex cardiac surgery

Comparison of Post-operative Outcomes Between Direct Axillary Artery Cannulation and Side-Graft Axillary Artery Cannulation in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

There is a growing perception of using axillary artery cannulation to improve operative outcomes in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Two techniques, direct cannulation or side-graft cannulation, can be used for axillary artery cannulation, but which technique is better is controversial.

Methods

A meta-analysis of comparative studies reporting operative outcomes using direct cannulation vs. side-graft cannulation was performed. We searched the PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Outcomes of interest were neurological dysfunction, cannulation-related complications and early mortality. The fixed effects model was used.

Results

A total of 1,543 patients were included in the final analysis. Direct cannulation was used in 846 patients, and side-graft cannulation was used in 697 patients. Meta-analysis showed a higher occurrence of neurological Complication in direct cannulation group [odds ratio, 1.45, 95% CI (1.00, 2.10), χ2 = 4.40, P = 0.05] and a significantly higher incidence of cannulation-related complications in the direct cannulation group [odds ratio, 3.12, 95% CI (1.87, 5.18), χ2 = 2.54, P < 0.0001]. The incidence of early mortality did not have a difference [odds ratio, 0.95, 95% CI (0.64, 1.41), χ2 = 6.35, P = 0.79].

Conclusions

This study suggests that side-graft axillary artery cannulation is a better strategy as it reduces the incidence of neurological dysfunction and cannulation-related complications.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022325456.

Surgical strategies for severely atherosclerotic (porcelain) aorta during coronary artery bypass grafting

Porcelain aorta (PA) is an asymptomatic atherosclerotic disease, characterized by circumferential calcification throughout the whole perimeter of the aorta. It is seen in 2% to 9.3% of patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and makes manipulation of the ascending aorta impossible. It has been clearly shown that most emboli seen and detected during the CABG procedure occur during aortic cross-clamping and aortic side-clamping. Manipulation of porcelain or a severely atherosclerotic aorta increases the risk of perioperative stroke. The incidence of stroke after CABG is between 0.48% and 2.9%, and the risk is correlated with the extent and severity of the atherosclerotic disease. A conventional CABG procedure involves successive steps that include cannulation of the ascending aorta, application of a cross-clamp to the aorta, and partial clamping of the aorta to create the proximal anastomosis. Therefore in procedures that involve cannulation, clamping, or proximal anastomosis, and where aortic manipulation is inevitable, preassessment of the atherosclerotic aortic plaques is crucial. Although many surgeons still rely on intraoperative manual aortic palpation, this approach has very low sensitivity and underestimates the severity of the atherosclerotic illness. Imaging methods including preoperative computed tomography or intraoperative epiaortic ultrasonography enable modification of the surgical technique according to the severity of atherosclerosis. Various surgical techniques have been described to reduce the risk of atheroembolism that may lead to cerebrovascular events in patients with severely atherosclerotic ascending aorta. Anaortic or "no-touch" techniques that do not utilize aortic manipulation may significantly decrease the development of neurological complications by avoiding aortic maneuvers known to cause emboli. In cases where severe atherosclerotic disease or other factors preclude safe use of the ascending aorta, modifications in the surgical techniques, such as switching to different cannulation sites including the axillary/subclavian, femoral and innominate arteries, or using hypothermic ventricular fibrillation and in-situ pedicled arterial grafts, or performing proximal anastomoses at alternative anatomical locations will enable CABG operations to be performed safely with low morbidity and mortality rates in patients with porcelain aortas.

Axillary venous drainage in redo aortic root surgery

The axillary artery is an established alternative cannulation site for peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, axillary vein cannulation is not as common. Here, we present our experience with an axillo-axillary CPB combined with a femoro-femoral CPB in redo aortic root replacement. The full-flow bypass was obtained with vacuum-assisted drainage and excellent decompression of the heart was achieved without left heart venting. Although only adhesions around the aortic root graft were dissected, a comfortable surgical field could be obtained with our CPB strategy. Axillary vessels were easy to expose with a small single skin incision. Cerebral protection could be achieved in both antegrade and retrograde fashion when the circulatory arrest was required for an additional arch procedure. Our strategy based on axillo-axillary and femoro-femoral CPB was effective and feasible in redo aortic root replacement. We consider that it simplified the complex aortic reoperation.

Pectoral Muscle Atrophy After Axillary Artery Cannulation for Aortic Arch Surgery

To investigate postoperative pectoral atrophy in 141 patients undergoing aortic arch surgery involving bilateral axillary artery cannulations with side grafts. The depth from the skin to the axillary artery surrounding the thoracoacromial artery (zone 1), and the thicknesses of pectoralis major (zone 2) and pectoralis minor (zone 3) were measured by computed tomography before surgery, at 1 and 6 months after surgery, and at the most recent follow-up assessment (PostT2) (mean = 41 months, range 11-75 months). Based on the median value (47.4 mm) of zone 1, the preoperative pectoral thickness was categorized into 2 groups: pectoral thickness >47.4 mm (thick group) and ≤47.4 mm (thin group). Mean changes in the pectoral thickness from baseline were evaluated using the longitudinal mixed-effects model. Forty-three of 110 patients underwent total arch replacements and extra-anatomical bypasses for left subclavian artery anastomoses. In 3 patients, axillary artery grafts became infected. There was no obvious harm associated with muscle wasting. Mean changes from baseline in zones 1, 2, and 3 showed significant declines at PostT2 (-13.40 ± 9.73 mm [P < 0.0001], -7.00 ± 5.23 mm [P < 0.0001], and -7.23 ± 6.42 mm [P < 0.0001], respectively). In the thick group, the progression of pectoral atrophy in zones 1 and 3 was significantly more than that of the thin group (P < 0.0001 for both zones). Postoperative pectoral atrophy progressed rapidly. The preoperative pectoral size might be of no use in the prevention of pectoral atrophy. Further investigation to prevent the pectoral atrophy is needed.

Recannulation of the axillary artery in aortic and complex cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVES

Axillary artery cannulation has been used as an alternative site for cardiopulmonary bypass during surgery for aortic dissections and aneurysmal disease of the ascending aorta and arch. This study reports our experience with reusing the axillary artery for cardiopulmonary bypass during complex aortic and cardiac surgical procedures.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of a single surgeon's experience of recannulating the axillary artery for redo operations in complex aortic surgery. Seven patients over a 7-year period have undergone recannulation of their axillary arteries. The old Dacron graft stump was either excised and a new graft was anastamosed to the axillary artery or a new end-to-side anastamosis was performed either proximal or distal to the original graft stump.

RESULTS

There were no deaths, strokes, or postoperative complications. In one patient, axillary cannulation was aborted intraoperatively due to high-line pressures, suggesting a local dissection. The other patients all had adequate perfusion via the recannulated axillary artery and there were no complications associated with its reuse.

CONCLUSIONS

Recannulation of the axillary artery is easily achievable and should be considered in redo aortic and complex cardiac surgery.

CT Angiography Analysis of Axillary Artery Diameter versus Common Femoral Artery Diameter: Implications for Axillary Approach for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Hostile Aortoiliac Segment and Advanced Lung Disease

Objective. The use of the axillary artery as an access site has lost favor in percutaneous intervention due to the success of these procedures from a radial or brachial alternative. However, these distal access points are unable to safely accommodate anything larger than a 7-French sheath. To date no studies exist describing the size of the axillary artery in relation to the common femoral artery in a patient population. We hypothesized that the axillary artery is of comparable size to the CFA in most patients and less frequently diseased. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 110 CT scans of the thoracic and abdominal aorta done at our institution to rule out aortic dissection in which the right axillary artery, right CFA, left axillary artery, and left CFA were visualized. Images were then reconstructed using commercially available TeraRecon software and comparative measurements made of the axillary and femoral arteries. Results. In 96 patients with complete data, the mean sizes of the right and left axillary artery were slightly smaller than the left and right CFA. A direct comparison of the sizes of the axillary artery and CFA in the same patient yielded a mean difference of 1.69 mm ± 1.74. In all patients combined, the mean difference between the axillary artery and CFA was 1.88 mm on the right and 1.68 mm on the left. In 19 patients (19.8%), the axillary artery was of the same caliber as the associated CFA. In 8 of 96 patients (8.3%), the axillary artery was larger compared to the CFA. Conclusions. Although typically smaller, the axillary artery is often of comparable size to the CFA, significantly less frequently calcified or diseased, and in almost all observed cases large enough to accommodate a sheath with up to 18 French.

Cannulation in aortic surgery: subclavian and axillary cannulation

Cannulation of peripheral vessels is being frequently used as a standard access for establishing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in recent times. Apart from an increased use in patients requiring left ventricular circulatory support, i.e. either extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or long-term ventricular assist device systems, peripheral vessel cannulation is also beneficial in aortic surgery. The subclavian and axillary arteries are commonly used as sites for arterial cannulation to establish CPB during aortic surgery in many centres. Both cannulation sites enable safe implementation of CPB in patients requiring complex and difficult reoperations and those undergoing aortic surgery for acute type A aortic dissections or artherosclerotic aortic disease, in which cerebral perfusion is required. Here, we describe our techniques of direct cannulation of the subclavian and axillary artery for aortic arch surgery.

Anesthetic Management for Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Cardiopulmonary bypass has revolutionized the practice of cardiac surgery and allows safe conduct of increasingly complex cardiac surgery. A brief review of the bypass circuit is undertaken in this review. A more thorough review of the anesthetic management is accomplished including choice of anesthetic medications and their effects. The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass is reviewed along with interventions that may help ameliorate the inflammation.

Efficacy of right axillary artery perfusion for antegrade cerebral perfusion in open total arch repair

OBJECTIVE

Right axillary artery (RAxA) perfusion was introduced for selective antegrade cerebral perfusion in total aortic arch repair to prevent cerebral embolism derived from arterial cannulation. However, the strategic benefits and long-term results regarding the cannulation site remain controversial. We retrospectively compared the outcomes between propensity score-matched patients with and without using RAxA cannulation.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2012, 260 consecutive patients underwent total arch repair with antegrade cerebral perfusion and moderate hypothermia at a single institution. RAxA cannulation was added in 142 patients (54.6%), and 70 propensity score-matched pairs were obtained.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in 30-day (2.9% [2 of 70] vs 5.7% [4 of 70]; P = .415 and in-hospital death (5.7% [4 of 70] vs 5.7% [4 of 70]; P = 1.000) between matched pairs. Although there was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative stroke (8.6% [6 of 70] vs 8.6% [6 of 70]; P = 1.000), the new rate of new occurrence of postoperative paraparesis was lower in patients with RAxA perfusion (0% [0 of 70] vs 4.3% [3 of 70]; P = .067). With a mean follow-up period of 1057 ± 686 days, the overall 5-year survival was 90.6% and was 89.6% for patients with RAxA perfusion. Thee difference in survival between patients with and without RAxA perfusion was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

RAxA perfusion is a useful option for total aortic arch repair, and the midterm outcomes were satisfactory. However, RAxA perfusion did not completely prevent stroke in patients with an atherothrombotic aorta.

Bad aorta

As its outcomes improve, cardiac surgery has been performed on more and more cases which were previously considered to be difficult to deal with. However, there are still a number of problems to be solved regarding surgery on patients with severe sclerotic lesions in the ascending aorta, which we collectively call "bad aorta". Concerning a preoperative assessment of the ascending aorta, our report revealed no relationship between the severity of calcification detected with a preoperative non-enhanced CT and the aortic lesion found during the surgery. Meanwhile, an intraoperative epiaortic ultrasound enables us to make high-quality evaluations of the aorta without imposing much burden on the patient. This modality may be essential for cardiac surgery. As for surgical management for bad aorta, quite a few methods have been reported to this point, but the overall operative mortality rate and cerebrovascular accident rate are relatively high, at a little <10 %, respectively. With the recent cross-clamping method under short-term total circulatory arrest (TCA), however, the results are much better; these rates total around 5 %. Further improvement is expected in the outcome of cardiac surgery on bad aorta cases by establishing a modality to evaluate sclerotic lesions in the ascending aorta with epiaortic ultrasound and by selecting a proper procedure for each case.