Imatinib for sclerodermatous graft-versus-host disease in lung transplantation

Nilotinib efficacy and safety as salvage treatment following imatinib intolerance and/or inefficacy in steroid refractory chronic graft-versus-host-disease (SR-cGVHD): a prospective, multicenter, phase II study on behalf of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)

Imatinib is used for patients with SR-cGVHD. However, in 50% of cases imatinib is discontinued due to intolerance or inefficacy. In order to investigate nilotinib's role as salvage therapy in those patients, we conducted a prospective, multicenter, phase II study. (NCT02891395). Patients with SR-cGVHD were included to receive imatinib. Patients who stopped imatinib due to intolerance or inefficacy switched to Nilotinib. The primary endpoint was defined as the week-12 response rate to Nilotinib. The response was considered successful if superior to the 30% endpoint. Sixty-two patients started the IM-phase. Fourteen patients (22%) discontinued imatinib before week 12 due to: cGVHD progression (10%) or TKI-class-specific intolerance (12%). At week 12, we observed complete remission in 13 patients (21%) and partial response in 8 patients (13%). Twenty-nine patients switched to Nilotinib. Nilotinib response at week-12 was observed in 6 patients (21%) while 23 patients (79%) discontinued Nilotinib due to intolerance/cGVHD progression. The primary endpoint was not reached. This prospective study confirmed the efficacy of imatinib in patients with steroid refractory cGVHD. It failed to demonstrate the efficacy of nilotinib as a salvage therapy in patients who were intolerant/unresponsive to imatinib.

The concurrent administration of imatinib with extracorporeal photopheresis leads to complete and durable responses in patients with refractory sclerotic type chronic graft-versus-host disease

Therapeutic options are limited for patients developing refractory sclerotic-type chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. We previously showed that imatinib mesylate (IM) could be efficacious in this situation, although complete responses were uncommon (Magro L Blood 2009). We hypothesized that the combination of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) and IM could have synergistic effects to treat SR steroid-refractory cGVHD. While IM and ECP are separately used for the treatment of refractory cGVHD, the combination of both has never been investigated. We describe here the efficacy of the concurrent administration of IM with ECP in seven patients with refractory sclerotic-type cGVHD who had showed insufficient response to either IM or ECP. Seven consecutive patients (3 males and 4 females) with a median age of 46 years old, who received imatinib with concurrent ECP for refractory sclerotic-type cGVHD, were included. Patients were considered refractory if they were steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent. Four patients had previously showed insufficient partial response (PR) to IM, while three patients showed insufficient PR while receiving ECP. IM was started at 200 mg/day and increased to 400 mg/day if well-tolerated. ECP was initiated twice weekly then less frequently according to the patient's individual treatment response. With a median follow-up of 56 months, the concurrent administration of IM with ECP deepened responses in all patients and induced durable complete responses (CR) in 4 (57%). Median time to best response was 4 months. Median duration of combination treatment was 42 months (range: 4-60). As of February 2018, 5 patients were still alive. Two patients died of myocardial infarction and one from relapse of a preexisting prostate cancer. The concurrent administration of IM with ECP led to complete and sustained responses in patients with refractory sclerotic-type cGVHD.

Cutaneous Manifestations of Scleroderma and Scleroderma-Like Disorders: a Comprehensive Review

Scleroderma refers to an autoimmune connective tissue fibrosing disease, including three different subsets: localized scleroderma, limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis, and diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis with divergent patterns of organ involvement, autoantibody profiles, management, and prognostic implications. Although systemic sclerosis is considered the disease prototype that causes cutaneous sclerosis, there are many other conditions that can mimic and be confused with SSc. They can be classified into immune-mediated/inflammatory, immune-mediated/inflammatory with abnormal deposit (mucinoses), genetic, drug-induced and toxic, metabolic, panniculitis/vascular, and (para)neoplastic disorders according to clinico-pathological and pathogenetic correlations. This article reviews the clinical presentation with emphasis on cutaneous disease, etiopathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment options available for the different forms of scleroderma firstly and for scleroderma-like disorders, including scleromyxedema, scleredema, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, eosinophilic fasciitis, chronic graft-versus-host disease, porphyria cutanea tarda, diabetic stiff-hand syndrome (diabetic cheiroartropathy), and other minor forms. This latter group of conditions, termed also scleroderma mimics, sclerodermiform diseases, or pseudosclerodermas, shares the common thread of skin thickening but presents with distinct cutaneous manifestations, skin histology, and systemic implications or disease associations, differentiating each entity from the others and from scleroderma. The lack of Raynaud's phenomenon, capillaroscopic abnormalities, or scleroderma-specific autoantibodies is also important diagnostic clues. As cutaneous involvement is the earliest, most frequent and characteristic manifestation of scleroderma and sclerodermoid disorders, dermatologists are often the first-line doctors who must be able to promptly recognize skin symptoms to provide the affected patient a correct diagnosis and appropriate management.

Advance in Targeted Immunotherapy for Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a serious and deadly complication of patients, who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Despite prophylactic treatment with immunosuppressive agents, 20–80% of recipients develop acute GVHD after HSCT. And the incidence rates of chronic GVHD range from 6 to 80%. Standard therapeutic strategies are still lacking, although considerable advances have been gained in knowing of the predisposing factors, pathology, and diagnosis of GVHD. Targeting immune cells, such as regulatory T cells, as well as tolerogenic dendritic cells or mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) display considerable benefit in the relief of GVHD through the deletion of alloactivated T cells. Monoclonal antibodies targeting cytokines or signaling molecules have been demonstrated to be beneficial for the prevention of GVHD. However, these remain to be verified in clinical therapy. It is also important and necessary to consider adopting individualized treatment based on GVHD subtypes, pathological mechanisms involved and stages. In the future, it is hoped that the identification of novel therapeutic targets and systematic research strategies may yield novel safe and effective approaches in clinic to improve outcomes of GVHD further. In this article, we reviewed the current advances in targeted immunotherapy for the prevention of GVHD.