Is using an open-reservoir cardiopulmonary bypass circuit after 6 days on standby safe?

An easy disinfection strategy for pipes connecting hemodialysis equipment

INTRODUCTION

A hemodialysis room has pipes connecting the console and central fluid equipment. While these pipes require disinfection, reports detailing disinfection strategies are unavailable. Therefore, we aimed to compare two easy disinfection strategies differing in sanitization frequency and sanitizer concentration.

METHODS

Reverse osmosis water (ROW) purifying equipment and six dialysis consoles were connected by 20 m of pipes. Only ROW flowed through these pipes, because the dialysate solution was constituted at each console. The pipes were sanitized by two strategies: (1) strong and monthly (hypochlorite concentration: 100 ppm) or (2) weak and weekly (5 ppm). Both strategies were easy because the sodium hypochlorite was simply added to the ROW tank. To estimate sanitization efficacy, endotoxin counts at the ROW tank outlet, the end of the pipe, and the pipe after the endotoxin-cutting filter in each console were measured monthly for six continuous months. These counts were compared between the two sanitization strategies.

RESULTS

The endotoxin counts at the ROW tank outlet and the end of the pipe were 0.004-0.017 and 0.012-0.081 EU/mL, respectively, in the strong and monthly strategy, and 0.001-0.003 and 0.001-0.005 EU/mL, respectively, in the weak and weekly strategy. The endotoxin counts at the pipe after the endotoxin-cutting filter were less than 0.001 EU/mL during the study period in both strategies.

CONCLUSION

A weekly disinfection strategy was more effective than a monthly one, despite the lower hypochlorite concentration. The present study suggests that frequency is the most important factor in the disinfection of pipes in a dialysis room.

Sterility and performance of open and closed extracorporeal circuits after long-term dry-wet setups

BACKGROUND

The timeframe for safely using previously setup dry, crystalloid, and blood-primed extracorporeal circuits has long been debated. This study was undertaken to determine a safe deviation from standardized recommendations.

METHODS

Open (cardiopulmonary bypass) circuits and closed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits were setup dry for up to 60 days and wet primed for up to 6 weeks with one control inoculated with Escherichia coli. Open circuits were cultured daily, closed circuits weekly. Circuits were primed with blood, albumin, heparin, NaHCO₃, and CaCl₂. Baseline pCO₂, pO₂, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, and plasma free hemoglobin were measured. Circuits were recirculated at a blood flow of 6 Liters/minute with a sweep gas of 1 Liter/minute at 100% FiO₂ for 1 minute. Post oxygenator blood gases were collected at 8-, 16-, and 24-hour intervals.

RESULTS

There was no observed compromise to the sterility of the circuits and no clinically significant gas exchange abnormalities observed over the duration of the study period. Statistical significance (p < 0.01) was seen in free hemoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase levels, most significant in between the 16- and 24-hour time point in the closed systems intentionally inoculated with E. coli.

CONCLUSION

Open and closed circuits can be safely setup dry for up to 60 days. Open, wet-primed circuits can be used safely up to 5 days. Closed, wet-primed circuits can be used safely up to 6 weeks. Blood-primed circuits can be safely run up to 16 hours prior to patient use but should be validated in a randomized clinical study.