Hypercoagulability After Resection of Thoracic Malignancy: A Prospective Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Rates of venous thromboembolism are increased in thoracic malignancy; however, coagulation patterns are not established. We hypothesize that patients with esophageal and lung malignancy have similar hypercoagulable pre- and postoperative profiles as defined by rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM).

METHODS

Prospective study was conducted in 47 patients with esophageal and lung cancer undergoing surgical resection. ROTEM evaluated pre/postoperative coagulation status.

RESULTS

Patients with thoracic malignancy were hypercoagulable by ROTEM, but not by conventional coagulation tests. Preoperative hypercoagulability was higher in lung versus esophageal cancer (64 vs. 16%, p = 0.001). Lung cancer patients that were hypercoagulable preoperatively demonstrated decreased maximum clot firmness (MCF) (p = 0.044) and increased clot time (p = 0.049) after surgical resection, suggesting reversal of hypercoagulability. Resection of esophageal cancer increased hypercoagulability (16 vs. 56%, p = 0.002) via elevated MCF (reflecting platelet activity). Hypercoagulability remained at follow-up clinic for both lung and esophageal cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypercoagulability in patients with lung malignancies reversed following complete surgical resection, whereas hypercoagulability occurred only postoperatively in those with esophageal malignancies. In both, hypercoagulability was associated with fibrin and platelet function.

Platelet function in lung cancer patients undergoing lobectomy

A growing interest concerns arterial thromboembolic disease in cancer patients. As platelets may be key players in this process, investigation of platelet aggregation in cancer patients is of importance. We aimed to investigate platelet aggregation in patients with lung cancer prior to surgery and during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy compared with lobectomy performed through a thoracotomy. We included 93 patients (VATS + low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), n = 32; VATS no LMWH, n = 31; thoracotomy + LMWH, n = 30). Data obtained from 121 healthy individuals were used for comparison prior to surgery. Platelet aggregation was analysed by impedance aggregometry using adenosine diphosphate 6.5 μM (ADPtest) and collagen 3.2 μg/mL (COLtest) as agonists. Prior to surgery, platelet aggregation was significantly increased in both VATS-patients (ADPtest, p < .0001; COLtest, p = .0002) and patients undergoing thoracotomy (ADPtest, p < .0001; COLtest, p < .0001) compared with healthy individuals. Platelet aggregation did not differ between VATS-patients and thoracotomy patients prior to surgery (p-values >.11). At the first postoperative day, VATS-patients demonstrated significantly higher collagen-induced platelet aggregation than preoperatively (p = .001), but the increase in platelet aggregation did not differ significantly between VATS and thoracotomy patients (p-values ≥.24). At the second postoperative day, platelet aggregation was significantly reduced in thoracotomy patients compared with the preoperative level (ADPtest, p = .002; COLtest, p = .05). In conclusion, platelet aggregation was significantly increased in patients with primary lung cancer prior to surgery compared with healthy individuals. At the first postoperative day, platelet aggregation was significantly higher than the preoperative level in VATS-patients; however, this increase did not differ between patient groups.

Optimal Approach to Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy was introduced over 25 years ago. More recently, the technique has been modified from a multiport video-assisted thoracic surgery (mVATS) to uniportal (uVATS) and robotic (rVATS), with proponents for each approach. Additionally most lobectomies are still performed using an open approach. We sought to provide evidence-based recommendations to help define the optimal surgical approach to lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis of articles searched without limits from January 2000 to January 2018 comparing open, mVATS, uVATS, and rVATS using sources Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were considered for inclusion. Articles were individually scrutinized by ISMICS consensus conference members, and evidence-based statements were created and consensus processes were used to determine the ensuing recommendations. The ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendation Classification system was used to assess the overall quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations.

Results and recommendations

One hundred and forty-five studies met the predefined inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Comparisons were analyzed between VATS and open, and between different VATS approaches looking at oncological outcomes (survival, recurrence, lymph node evaluation), safety (adverse events), function (pain, quality of life, pulmonary function), and cost-effectiveness. Fifteen statements addressing these areas achieved consensus. The highest level of evidence suggested that mVATS is preferable to open lobectomy with lower adverse events (36% versus 42%; 88,460 patients) and less pain (IIa recommendation). Our meta-analysis suggested that overall survival was better (IIb) with mVATS compared with open (71.5% versus 66.7% 5-years; 16,200 patients). Different VATS approaches were similar for most outcomes, although uVATS may be associated with less pain and analgesic requirements (IIb).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis supports the role of VATS lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Apart from potentially less pain and analgesic requirement with uVATS, different minimally invasive surgical approaches appear to have similar outcomes.