Yokoyama H, Yamanaka F, Shishido K, Ochiai T, Yokota S, Moriyama N, Watanabe Y, Shirai S, Tada N, Araki M, Yashima F, Naganuma T, Ueno H, Tabata M, Mizutani K, Takagi K, Yamamoto M, Saito S, Hayashida K. Prognostic Value of Ventricular-Arterial Coupling After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Midterm Clinical Outcomes.
J Am Heart Assoc 2021;
10:e019267. [PMID:
34533038 PMCID:
PMC8649497 DOI:
10.1161/jaha.120.019267]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background
Ventricular‐arterial coupling predicts outcomes in patients with heart failure. The arterial elastance to end‐systolic elastance ratio (Ea/Ees) is a noninvasively assessed index that reflects ventricular‐arterial coupling. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of ventricular‐arterial coupling assessed through Ea/Ees after transcatheter aortic valve replacement to predict clinical events.
Methods and Results
We retrieved data on 1378 patients (70% women) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement between October 2013 and May 2017 from the OCEAN‐TAVI (Optimized transCathEter vAlvular iNtervention) Japanese multicenter registry. We determined the association between Ea/Ees and the composite end point of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death by classifying the patients into quartiles based on Ea/Ees values (group 1: <0.326; group 2: 0.326–0.453; group 3: 0.453–0.666; and group 4: >0.666) during the midterm follow‐up after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. During a median follow‐up period of 736 days (interquartile range, 414–956), there were 247 (17.9%) all‐cause deaths, 89 (6.5%) cardiovascular deaths, 130 (9.4%) hospitalizations for heart failure, and 199 (14.4%) composite events of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death. The incidence of the composite end point was significantly higher in group 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.08–2.87 [P=0.024]), group 3 (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.53–3.86 [P<0.001]), and group 4 (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.83–4.57 [P<0.001]) than that in group 1. On adjusted multivariable Cox analysis, Ea/Ees was significantly associated with composite events (HR, 1.47 per 1‐unit increase; 95% CI, 1.08–2.01 [P=0.015]).
Conclusions
These findings suggest that a higher Ea/Ees at discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with adverse clinical outcomes during midterm follow‐up.
Registration
URL: https://www.upload.umin.ac.jp/. Unique identifier: UMIN000020423.
Collapse