Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Valvular Cardiogenic Shock

Background

The clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients who develop cardiogenic shock (CS) secondary to primary valvular dysfunction (valvular cardiogenic shock [VCS]) remain unclear.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to describe the cohort of patients with VCS and understand their outcomes compared to other forms of CS.

Methods

All patients admitted to Cleveland Clinic cardiac intensive care unit between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021, with a diagnosis of CS were retrospectively identified. Characteristics and outcomes for shock patients with VCS were compared to those without VCS.

Results

A total of 2,754 patients were admitted to our cardiac intensive care unit with CS, of which 442 (16%) had VCS. The median age of patients with VCS was higher than those with non-VCS (70 years vs 64 years, P < 0.001) and were more likely females (40.3% vs 32.1%, P = 0.001). VCS was predominantly due to native valve dysfunction as compared to prosthetic valve dysfunction (71% vs 29%, P < 0.001), with the aortic valve noted to be the most common valve affected. Patients with VCS had higher 1-year (44% vs 37%, P < 0.001) and 30-day all-cause mortality (28% vs 20%, P < 0.001) compared to those without VCS. When compared to percutaneous intervention and medical therapy alone, surgical intervention in VCS was associated with the best short- and long-term outcomes (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

VCS is associated with poor short and long outcomes. Native valvular dysfunction and aortic valve involvement account for the majority of patients with VCS. Definitive surgical therapy and expanding the role of percutaneous therapies may be pivotal in improving clinical outcomes in this high-risk cohort.

Myocardial Injury After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Reoperation

This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and clinical implications of myocardial injury, as determined by cardiac biomarker increase, in patients who underwent mitral bioprosthesis dysfunction treatment with transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) versus surgical mitral valve replacement reoperation (SMVR-REDO). Between 2014 and 2023, 310 patients with mitral bioprosthesis failure were included (90 and 220 patients for TMVR and SMVR-REDO, respectively). Multivariable analysis and propensity score matching were performed to adjust for the intergroup differences in baseline characteristics. Creatinine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and cardiac troponin I (cTn) were collected at baseline and 6 to 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after intervention. The cardiac biomarkers values were evaluated in relation to their reference values. The outcomes were determined according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. CK-MB and cTn increased above the reference level in almost all patients after SMVR-REDO and TMVR (100% vs 94%, respectively), with the peak occurring within 6 to 12 hours. SMVR-REDO was associated with a two- to threefold higher increase in cardiac biomarkers. After 30 days, the mortality rates were 13.3% in the TMVR and 16.8% in the SMVR-REDO groups. At a median follow-up of 19 months, the mortality rates were 21.1% in the TMVR and 17.7% in the SMVR-REDO groups. Left ventricular ejection fraction, estimated glomerular filtration rate, CK-MB, and cTn were predictors of mortality. In conclusion, some degree of myocardial injury occurred systematically after the treatment of mitral bioprosthetic degeneration, especially after SMVR, and higher CK-MB and cTn levels were associated with increased cumulative late mortality, regardless of the approach.

Long-term echocardiographic data, mechanisms of failure, and reintervention outcomes of the Epic valve in mitral position-a large observational cohort

OBJECTIVES

Long-term echocardiographic reports on mitral valve (MV) porcine xenograft bioprosthesis (Epic) are lacking, and postreintervention outcomes of failed Epic are unknown. We aimed to assess the mechanisms and independent predictors of Epic failures and to compare short- and mid-term outcomes according to reintervention type.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients (n = 1397; mean age: 72 ± 8 years; 46% female; mean follow-up: 4.8 years) who received the Epic during mitral valve replacement (MVR) at our institution. Clinical, echocardiographic, reintervention, and outcomes data were retrieved from our prospective institution's database or government statistics.

RESULTS

Gradients and effective orifice area of the Epic were stable over 5-years follow-up. A total of 70 (5%) patients had a MV reintervention at median follow-up of 3.0 (0.7-5.4) years due to prosthesis failure, by redo-MVR (n = 38; 54%), valve-in-valve (n = 19; 27%), paravalvular leak (PVL) closure (n = 12; 17%), or thrombectomy (n = 1). Mechanisms of failure were 27 (1.9%) structural valve deterioration (SVD; all leaflet tear); 16 (1.1%) non-SVD (15 PVL, 1 pannus); 24 (1.7%) endocarditis; and 4 (0.3%) thrombosis. Freedom from all-cause and SVD-related MV reintervention at 10 years are 88% and 92%, respectively. Independent predictors of reintervention were age, baseline atrial fibrillation, initial MV etiology, and moderate or greater PVL at discharge (all P ≤ .05). Comparison of redo-MVR and valve-in-valve revealed no significant difference in early outcomes or mid-term mortality (all P ≥ .16).

CONCLUSIONS

The Epic Mitral valve has stable hemodynamics through 5 years and is associated with low incidence of SVD and reintervention, mostly due to endocarditis and leaflet tear without calcification. Reintervention type had no influence on early outcomes and mid-term mortality.

Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve: treatment of rheumatic heart disease in young patients

BACKGROUND

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) in young people presents a complex management problem. In Australia a significant proportion of those affected are Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve (TMViV) replacement has emerged as an alternative to redo surgery in high-risk patients with degenerated mitral bioprostheses. The aim of this study is to review outcomes of TMViV replacement in young patients with RHD.

METHODS

A single-centre, retrospective review of prospectively collected data on patients undergoing TMViV from December 2017 to June 2021. Primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcome was post-operative trans-thoracic echocardiogram (TTE) results.

RESULTS

There were seven patients with a mean age of 33 years and predominantly female (n = 5). Pre-operative comorbidities included diabetes (29%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (43%), left ventricular dysfunction (43%) and current smoking status (80%). Post-operative median length of hospital stay was 4 days with no post-operative renal failure, stroke, return to theatre, valve embolization or in hospital mortality. Post-operative TTE showed either nil or trivial central mitral regurgitation, no paravalvular leak and a median gradient of 5 mmHg (IQR 4.5, 7) across the new bioprosthesis; sustained at median follow-up of 22 months.

CONCLUSION

Current literature of TMViV replacement is focused on an older population with concurrent comorbidities. This study provides a unique insight into TMViV replacement in a young cohort of patients with complex social and geographical factors which sometimes prohibits the use of a mechanical valve. The prevalence of RHD remains high for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, planning for future repeat valve operations should be considered from the outset. We consider TMViV as a part of a staged procedural journey for young patients with RHD.

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation in the ongoing structural heart revolution

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) has emerged as a less invasive approach potentially surmounting some of the current hurdles associated with transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and high-risk mitral valve surgery. In this review, we aimed to outline the main scenarios in the TMVI field, highlight current and upcoming devices, and describe challenges and clinical results. Finally, we briefly discuss the future perspectives for this emerging field and how TMVI might further advance the field of transcatheter treatments of mitral valve disease.

Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Procedures for Bioprosthetic Valve Dysfunction in Patients With Rheumatic vs. Non-Rheumatic Valvular Heart Disease

Background: Bioprosthetic heart valve has limited durability and lower long-term performance especially in rheumatic heart disease (RHD) patients that are often subject to multiple redo operations. Minimally invasive procedures, such as transcatheter valve-in-valve (ViV) implantation, may offer an attractive alternative, although data is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes in rheumatic vs. non-rheumatic patients undergoing ViV procedures for severe bioprosthetic valve dysfunction.

Methods: Single center, prospective study, including consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter ViV implantation in aortic, mitral and tricuspid position, from May 2015 to September 2020. RHD was defined according to clinical history, previous echocardiographic and surgical findings.

Results: Among 106 patients included, 69 had rheumatic etiology and 37 were non-rheumatic. Rheumatic patients had higher incidence of female sex (73.9 vs. 43.2%, respectively; p = 0.004), atrial fibrillation (82.6 vs. 45.9%, respectively; p < 0.001), and 2 or more prior surgeries (68.1 vs. 32.4%, respectively; p = 0.001). Although, device success was similar between groups (75.4 vs. 89.2% in rheumatic vs. non-rheumatic, respectively; p = 0.148), there was a trend toward higher 30-day mortality rates in the rheumatic patients (21.7 vs. 5.4%, respectively; p = 0.057). Still, at median follow-up of 20.7 [5.1–30.4] months, cumulative mortality was similar between both groups (p = 0.779).

Conclusion: Transcatheter ViV implantation is an acceptable alternative to redo operations in the treatment of patients with RHD and severe bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. Despite similar device success rates, rheumatic patients present higher 30-day mortality rates with good mid-term clinical outcomes. Future studies with a larger number of patients and follow-up are still warranted, to firmly conclude on the role transcatheter ViV procedures in the RHD population.

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic and mitral valves - an update on indications, techniques, and clinical results

Introduction: Aortic and mitral bioprosthesis are the gold standard treatment to replace a pathological native valve. However, bioprostheses are prone to structural valve degeneration, resulting in limited long-term durability. During the past decade, the implantation of transcatheter stent-valves within degenerated aortic and mitral bioprostheses, (the so-called 'valve-in-valve' procedure), represents a valid alternative to redo surgery in patients with high-risk surgical profiles.Areas covered: We reviewed the clinical outcomes and the procedural details of transcatheter aortic and mitral valve-in-valve series according to current published literature and include a practical guide for valve sizing and stent-valve positioning and strategies to prevent complications.Expert opinion: In both aortic and mitral positions meticulous planning is fundamental in these procedures to avoid serious complications including patient prosthesis mismatch, coronary obstruction and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.

Double transcatheter balloon-expandable valve implantation for severe valve dysfunction in high-risk patients: initial experience

OBJECTIVES

Concomitant valvular heart valve disease is a frequent finding, with higher morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing redo surgical procedures. Our goal was to report our initial experience with combined transcatheter Inovare bioprosthesis implants for severe valve dysfunction.

METHODS

Among 300 transcatheter procedures, a total of 6 patients had concurrent simultaneous transcatheter bioprosthesis implants for severe mitral bioprosthesis failure (valve-in-valve), with a second valve procedure that included native aortic (n = 2) or degenerated bioprostheses in the aortic position (n = 4). During the procedures, all patients were treated with a balloon-expandable Inovare transcatheter valve, using the transapical approach.

RESULTS

Patients were highly symptomatic [New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV: 100%], with a mean age of 62 ± 5 years, yielding a mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk II (EuroSCORE II) of 24.0 ± 10.1%. There was a mean of 1.6 ± 0.4 prior valve operations/patient, with a median time from prior mitral bioprosthesis surgery of 13.0 (9.2-20.0) years. Device success was 100% according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium and the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. During the hospital stay, only 1 patient required dialysis, and the median intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were 5.0 (3.2-6.7) days and 16.0 (12.2-21.2) days, respectively. No deaths occurred at 30 days; at a median follow-up of 287 (194-437) days, 1 patient died of a non-cardiac cause and the rest of patients were in NYHA functional class I or II, with normofunctioning bioprostheses.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter double valve interventions using the Inovare bioprosthesis in this initial series were shown to be a reasonable alternative to redo surgical operations. The short- and mid-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes demonstrate promising results, although future studies with a larger number of patients and longer follow-up are warranted.

Current Indications for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Using Transcatheter Aortic Valves

Use of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) using transcatheter aortic valves in clinical practice is limited to patients with failing bioprostheses and rings or mitral valve disease associated with severe mitral annulus calcification. Whereas the use of valve-in-valve TMVR appears to be a reasonable alternative to surgery in patients at high surgical risk, much less evidence supports valve-in-ring and valve-in-mitral annulus calcification interventions. Data on the results of TMVR in these settings are derived from small case series or voluntary registries. This review summarizes the current evidence on TMVR using transcatheter aortic valves in clinical practice from the characteristics of the TMVR candidates, screening process, performance of the procedure, and description of current results and future perspectives. TMVR using dedicated devices in native noncalcified mitral valve diseases is beyond the scope of the article.

Contemporary Reoperative Mitral Valve Surgery: Technical Considerations and Clinical Outcomes

As patients with cardiac disease live longer, reoperative mitral valve surgery has become more common. Although these operations are technically challenging and of high risk, outcomes continue to improve. Minimally invasive techniques, better cardioprotective strategies, and advanced perioperative care have contributed to this. In this review, we discuss surgical approaches, intraoperative strategies, novel catheter-directed devices, and clinical outcomes of contemporary reoperative mitral valve surgery.