Lung cancer, smoking and smelter work in a occupational cohort

Former Workers of a Bright Electroplating Factory Located in Vercelli: A Cohort Study From 1974 to 2016: Legal Expertise Results

BACKGROUND

The mortality risk among former workers of a factory with an adjoining galvanic activity has been assessed; several environmental analyses found in the site the presence of nickel and organochlorinated substances.

METHODS

The cohort followed by 1974 to 2016 is represented by 899 individuals in which there were 191 deaths: 140 males and 51 females. A risks analysis with elaboration of SMR between observed cases and the expected one referring to Piemonte region rates was performed.

RESULTS

The excesses stratified by gender and task have highlighted enhanced cancer risk (especially lung and liver cancers) among men workers. For females, cancer risk is enhanced especially for pancreas, ovary, and total digestive tract cancers.

CONCLUSION

The report confirms an increased risk between nickel and lung cancers and organochlorinated and liver cancer.

Systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence in the 1900s relating smoking to lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Smoking is a known lung cancer cause, but no detailed quantitative systematic review exists. We summarize evidence for various indices.

METHODS

Papers published before 2000 describing epidemiological studies involving 100+ lung cancer cases were obtained from Medline and other sources. Studies were classified as principal, or subsidiary where cases overlapped with principal studies. Data were extracted on design, exposures, histological types and confounder adjustment. RRs/ORs and 95% CIs were extracted for ever, current and ex smoking of cigarettes, pipes and cigars and indices of cigarette type and dose-response. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions investigated how relationships varied by study and RR characteristics, mainly for outcomes exactly or closely equivalent to all lung cancer, squamous cell carcinoma ("squamous") and adenocarcinoma ("adeno").

RESULTS

287 studies (20 subsidiary) were identified. Although RR estimates were markedly heterogeneous, the meta-analyses demonstrated a relationship of smoking with lung cancer risk, clearly seen for ever smoking (random-effects RR 5.50, CI 5.07-5.96) current smoking (8.43, 7.63-9.31), ex smoking (4.30, 3.93-4.71) and pipe/cigar only smoking (2.92, 2.38-3.57). It was stronger for squamous (current smoking RR 16.91, 13.14-21.76) than adeno (4.21, 3.32-5.34), and evident in both sexes (RRs somewhat higher in males), all continents (RRs highest for North America and lowest for Asia, particularly China), and both study types (RRs higher for prospective studies). Relationships were somewhat stronger in later starting and larger studies. RR estimates were similar in cigarette only and mixed smokers, and similar in smokers of pipes/cigars only, pipes only and cigars only. Exceptionally no increase in adeno risk was seen for pipe/cigar only smokers (0.93, 0.62-1.40). RRs were unrelated to mentholation, and higher for non-filter and handrolled cigarettes. RRs increased with amount smoked, duration, earlier starting age, tar level and fraction smoked and decreased with time quit. Relationships were strongest for small and squamous cell, intermediate for large cell and weakest for adenocarcinoma. Covariate-adjustment little affected RR estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

The association of lung cancer with smoking is strong, evident for all lung cancer types, dose-related and insensitive to covariate-adjustment. This emphasises the causal nature of the relationship. Our results quantify the relationships more precisely than previously.

Lung cancer risks among lead smelter workers also exposed to arsenic

Recent publications indicate an increased incidence of lung cancer in non-ferrous smelter workers exposed to lead. The present study provides further data on selected subgroups in one such cohort. The cohort was based on 3979 smelter workers employed for at least 1 year between 1928 and 1979, and also exposed to lead and included in the Blood Lead Register that was started at the smelter in 1950. Two subcohorts were formed from the original cohort. One consists of 710 workers employed at the lead departments (Lead subcohort 1), and the other of 383 workers employed at the lead departments (Lead subcohort 2), but never at other works where an excess lung cancer risk was previously identified. Standardized Cancer Incidence Rates (SIR) 1958-1987 were calculated relative to county rates. In the subcohorts, arsenic exposure in lung cancer cases was assessed in detail based on occupational hygiene information from the company. Lung cancer incidence was raised in both subcohorts (Lead subcohort 1: SIR 2.4; 95% CI 1.2-4.5; Lead subcohort 2: SIR 3.6; 95% CI 1.2-8.3). Total cancer incidence in the cohorts was not increased. A detailed study of arsenic exposure in the 10 lung cancer cases in these two subcohorts revealed that all but one of these cases had a significant exposure also to arsenic. An elevated incidence of lung cancer was observed in smelter workers exposed to lead. However, considerable arsenic exposure also occurred in a majority of the lung cancer cases in the investigated subcohorts. In this multifactorial exposure situation it has not been possible to separate the carcinogenic effects of lead and arsenic, but a possible interaction between these metals may be involved in explaining the carcinogenic risks.