Comparison of information on occupation and lifestyle habits obtained from European man-made vitreous fibre production workers and their relatives

The role of residential history in cancer research: A scoping review

The role of residential history in cancer prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship is garnering increasing attention in cancer research. To our knowledge, there is no comprehensive synthesis of the current state of knowledge in the field. We reviewed the extant literature on this topic and conducted a scoping analysis to examine two main research questions: (a) To what degree, and how, have researchers accounted for residential history/mobility in cancer research? and (b) What are the gaps in the literature based on a knowledge synthesis using scoping review and concept mapping? To answer these questions, this scoping analysis focuses on how researchers compile, analyze and discuss residential history/mobility in studies on cancer. The study is focused on peer-reviewed articles from 6 different datasets (PubMed, Cinahl, Scopus, Web of Science and JSTOR, ERIC) from 1990 to August 2020. The review captured 1951 results in total, which was scoped to 281 relevant peer-reviewed journal articles. First, we examined these articles based on cancer continuum, cancer type and the main theme. Second, we identified 21 main themes and an additional 16 sub-themes in the pool of the selected articles. We utilized concept mapping to provide a conceptual framework and to highlight the underlying socioecological assumptions and paradigms. Results show that cancer research incorporating residential histories is primarily focused on incidence and estimating cumulative exposure, with little consideration across the cancer continuum. Additionally, our review suggests that although the social environment plays an important role across the cancer continuum, a small number of articles were focused on such factors and this area remains relatively unexplored. Additionally, the expansion of interdisciplinary research on residential mobility before and after cancer diagnosis will enhance understanding of the role of environmental and socioeconomic characteristics and exposures on cancer continuum.

Agreement between Myocardial Infarction Patients and Their Spouses on Reporting of Data on 82 Cardiovascular Risk Exposures

BACKGROUND

The validity of exposure data collected from proxy respondents of myocardial infarction patients has scarcely been studied. We assessed the level of disagreement between myocardial infarction patients and their spouses with respect to the reporting of the patient´s cardiovascular risk exposures.

METHODS

Within the frame of the Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program (SHEEP), a case-control study of risk factors of myocardial infarction performed in Stockholm county 1992-1994, a subset of 327 first time myocardial infarction cases aged 45-70 who survived >28 days after the event and who co-habited with a spouse or common-law spouse (proxy) were identified between 1993-04-05 and 1993-12-31. Among these, 243 cases participated along with their respective proxy in the present study. Control individuals, matched to cases by age, sex and residential area were also included (n = 243). Data were collected using questionnaires. Using conditional logistic regression we calculated for each of 82 exposures the odds ratio based on information collected from 1) myocardial infarction cases and controls [odds ratio A] and 2) proxies and the same set of controls [odds ratio B]. Disagreement was measured by calculating the ratio between odds ratio B and odds ratio A with 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated using resampling bootstrap.

RESULTS

For the vast majority of the exposures considered including diet, smoking, education, work-related stress, and family history of CVD, there was no statistically significant disagreement between myocardial infarction patients and proxies (n = 243 pairs). However, leisure time physical inactivity (proxy bias = 1.59, 95% CI 1.05-3.57) was overestimated by spouses compared to myocardial infarction patients. A few other exposures including some sleep-related problems and work-related issues also showed disagreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial infarction patients and their spouses similarly reported data on a wide range of exposures including the majority of the traditional cardiovascular risk factors, leisure time physical inactivity being an exception.

Comparison of patient and proxy responses on risk factors for stroke

BACKGROUND

For studies on chronic risk factors and trigger (i.e. acute risk) factors, stroke researchers often have to rely on proxies. The reliability of proxy responses regarding trigger factors for stroke is unknown.

METHODS

Thirty patients with stroke and their proxies were interviewed about chronic risk factors and trigger factors. We assessed the completeness of proxy-derived data by calculating the level of non-response and the level of agreement using Cohen kappa statistics.

RESULTS

For most chronic risk factors and trigger factors, the response rate to whether or not exposure had taken place in the past year was 87% or higher. If couples agreed on exposure, patient and proxy could also provide a comparable estimate of the average frequency of exposure. Although the non-response on last time of exposure was higher, proxies who could answer provide a reasonably good estimate for most trigger factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Proxies provide reliable information on exposure to chronic risk factors and trigger factors for stroke. For exposure and average frequency of exposure, non-response is low and the level of agreement is high for most chronic risk factors; for last time of exposure non-response is higher, but proxies who could respond provided reliable estimates of last time of exposure to most trigger factors.

Exposure assessment for a nested case-control study of lung cancer among European asphalt workers

OBJECTIVE

Development of a method for retrospective assessment of exposure to bitumen fume, bitumen condensate, organic vapour, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and co-exposures to known or suspected lung carcinogens for a nested case-control study of lung cancer mortality among European asphalt workers.

METHODS

Company questionnaires and structured questionnaires used in interviews and industry-specific job-exposure matrices (JEMs) were elaborated and applied. Three sources of information were eventually used for exposure assessment and assignment: (i) data obtained in cohort phase, (ii) data from living subjects, next-of-kin, and fellow-workers questionnaires, and (iii) JEMs for bitumen exposure by inhalation and via skin and co-exposures to known or suspected lung carcinogens within and outside cohort companies. Inhalation and dermal exposure estimates for bitumen were adjusted for time trends, time spent in a job, and other determinants of exposure (e.g. oil gravel paving). Clothing patterns, personal protective devices, and personal hygiene were taken into consideration while estimating dermal exposure.

RESULTS

Occupational exposures could be assessed for 433 cases and 1253 controls for relevant time periods. Only 43% of work histories were spent inside original asphalt and construction companies. A total of 95.8% of job periods in cohort companies could be coded at a more detailed level. Imputation of work time and 'hygienic behaviour' multipliers was needed for <10% of work history years. Overall, downward trends in exposure were present and differences existed between countries and companies. As expected, correlations were strongest (r > 0.7) among bitumen-related agents, while correlations between coal tar, bitumen-related agents, and established lung carcinogens were weaker (r < 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

A systematic and detailed approach was developed to estimate inhalation and dermal exposure for a nested case-control study among asphalt workers.

Comparison of asbestos exposure assessments by next-of-kin respondents, by an occupational hygienist, and by a job-exposure matrix from the National Occupational Hazard Survey

BACKGROUND

Assessments of occupational exposures in case-control studies of rapidly fatal illnesses often rely on data from next-of-kin respondents, which may be inaccurate.

METHODS

Three methods for assessing exposure to asbestos from case-control data on mesothelioma, including next-of-kin assessment, expert assessment, and use of a generic job-exposure matrix (JEM). Interview data [Spirtas et al. (1994): Occup Environ Med 51:804-811] were reviewed to determine exposure status by an occupational hygienist (C.R.) who was unaware of disease status. Exposure odds ratios were calculated using standard methods, and measures of agreement included the kappa statistic and conditional and marginal odds ratios.

RESULTS

Expert assessment detected higher proportions of exposed subjects than the next-of-kin respondents or JEM methods. The disease-exposure odds ratios were highest for respondents, perhaps because of recall bias, and lowest for the JEM method. The agreement was highest between the respondent and expert assessments. A combination of respondent's assessment and JEM assessment led to the best prediction of the expert's assessment. Results for spouse respondents were similar to those for other "next-of-kin" respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

Expert assessments were the most plausible, but the data indicate that disease associations could also be detected with the other exposure assessment methods. Using some combination of the proxy respondent's assessment and the JEM assessment, one can predict the expert's assessment. A strategy that relied on the respondent's assessment when it was positive and otherwise obtained an expert assessment could reduce costs with little error, compared to expert assessment on all subjects.

Lung cancer among rock and slag wool production workers

BACKGROUND

Previous cohort studies have found an elevated risk of lung cancer among rock and slag wool (RSW) production workers. The aim of the present study was to investigate the risk of lung cancer associated with exposure to RSW while controlling for other occupational exposures and tobacco smoking.

METHODS

Since 1971, a total of 196 lung cancer cases occurred among men who worked in seven plants in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Germany, with start of production between 1937 and 1950. We obtained information on occupational history and extra-occupational factors from either the subject or the next of kin for 133 cases and 513 matched controls. We assessed occupational exposure on the basis of interview data combined with information from expert panels set up in each factory.

RESULTS

For cumulative exposure to RSW assessed with a 15-year lag, the smoking-adjusted odds ratios in the second, third, and fourth quartiles of exposure were 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.7-2.3), 1.0 (CI = 0.5-1.9), and 0.7 (CI = 0.3-1.3). Similar results were obtained when we included only those workers employed for more than 1 year, when we included other indicators of RSW exposure, and after control for co-exposures.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides no evidence of a carcinogenic effect on the lung of rock and slag wool under exposure circumstances in the production industry during the last four to five decades.