|
1
|
Rudland VL, Price SAL, Hughes R, Barrett HL, Lagstrom J, Porter C, Britten FL, Glastras S, Fulcher I, Wein P, Simmons D, McIntyre HD, Callaway L. ADIPS 2020 guideline for pre-existing diabetes and pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 60:E18-E52. [PMID: 33200400 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This is the full version of the Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) 2020 guideline for pre-existing diabetes and pregnancy. The guideline encompasses the management of women with pre-existing type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes in relation to pregnancy, including preconception, antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum care. The management of women with monogenic diabetes or cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in relation to pregnancy is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria L Rudland
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah A L Price
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Diabetes, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ruth Hughes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Helen L Barrett
- Department of Endocrinology, Mater Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Mater Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Janet Lagstrom
- Green St Specialists Wangaratta, Wangaratta, Victoria, Australia.,Denis Medical Yarrawonga, Yarrawonga, Victoria, Australia.,Corowa Medical Clinic, Corowa, New South Wales, Australia.,NCN Health, Numurkah, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cynthia Porter
- Geraldton Diabetes Clinic, Geraldton, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Fiona L Britten
- Department of Obstetric Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Mater Private Hospital and Mater Mother's Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sarah Glastras
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian Fulcher
- Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter Wein
- Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Simmons
- Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - H David McIntyre
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Mater Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Leonie Callaway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Women's and Children's Services, Metro North Hospital and Health Service District, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Women's and Newborn Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Stoffel ST, Hirst Y, Ghanouni A, Waller J, von Wagner C. Offering disinclined people the choice between different screening appointments: a randomised online survey. Psychol Health 2020; 36:1135-1146. [PMID: 33073598 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2020.1834559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES An invitation to cancer screening with a single (fixed) appointment time has been shown to be a more effective way at increasing uptake compared with an invitation with an open (unscheduled) appointment. The present study tested whether offering more than one fixed appointment could further enhance this effect or be detrimental to people's intention. DESIGN Experimental online hypothetical vignette survey. METHODS 1,908 respondents who stated that they did not intend to participate in Bowel Scope Screening (BSS) were offered either one, two, four or six hypothetical fixed BSS appointments (all of which covered the same time of day to control for individual preferences). RESULTS Participants who were given more than one appointment to choose from were less likely to intend to book an appointment despite multiple appointments being perceived as more convenient. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that when it comes to offering people appointments for cancer screening, less (choice) is more, at least if alternatives fail to serve an inherent preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro Tiziano Stoffel
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.,Business School, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.,Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Yasemin Hirst
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alex Ghanouni
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jo Waller
- Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Christian von Wagner
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|