Selective Orexin Receptor Antagonists as Novel Augmentation Treatments for Major Depressive Disorder: Evidence for Safety and Efficacy From a Phase 2B Study of Seltorexant

Depression clinical trials worldwide: a systematic analysis of the ICTRP and comparison with ClinicalTrials.gov

Major depressive disorder (MDD), commonly known as depression, affects over 300 million people worldwide as of 2018 and presents a wide range of clinical symptoms. The international clinical trials registry platform (ICTRP) introduced by WHO includes aggregated data from ClinicalTrials.gov and 17 other national registers, making it the largest clinical trial platform. Here we analysed data in ICTRP with the aim of providing comprehensive insights into clinical trials on depression. Applying a novel hidden duplicate identification method, 10,606 depression trials were identified in ICTRP, with ANZCTR being the largest non- ClinicalTrials.gov database at 1031 trials, followed by IRCT with 576 trials, ISRCTN with 501 trials, CHiCTR with 489 trials, and EUCTR with 351 trials. The top four most studied drugs, ketamine, sertraline, duloxetine, and fluoxetine, were consistent in both groups, but ClinicalTrials.gov had more trials for each drug compared to the non-ClinicalTrials.gov group. Out of 9229 interventional trials, 663 unique agents were identified, including approved drugs (74.5%), investigational drugs (23.2%), withdrawn drugs (1.8%), nutraceuticals (0.3%), and illicit substances (0.2%). Both ClinicalTrials.gov and non-ClinicalTrials.gov databases revealed that the largest categories were antidepressive agents (1172 in ClinicalTrials.gov and 659 in non-ClinicalTrials.gov) and nutrients, amino acids, and chemical elements (250 in ClinicalTrials.gov and 659 in non-ClinicalTrials.gov), indicating a focus on alternative treatments involving dietary supplements and nutrients. Additionally, 26 investigational antidepressive agents targeting 16 different drug targets were identified, with buprenorphine (opioid agonist), saredutant (NK2 antagonist), and seltorexant (OX2 antagonist) being the most frequently studied. This analysis addresses 40 approved drugs for depression treatment including new drug classes like GABA modulators and NMDA antagonists that are offering new prospects for treating MDD, including drug-resistant depression and postpartum depression subtypes.

Association between peripheral orexin A/B levels and depression with childhood trauma

BACKGROUND

Orexin dysfunction has previously been demonstrated to be associated with depression. However, no studies reported the different effects of orexin A/B on depression with and without childhood trauma (CT). In this study，we assessed the correlation between expression of orexin A/B and depression severity in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients and healthy controls.

METHODS

A total of 97 MDD patients and 51 healthy controls were recruited in this study. According to the total scores of childhood trauma questionnaire (CTQ), the MDD patients were further divided into two subgroups, MDD with CT and MDD without CT. The 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17), and plasma orexin A and orexin B concentrations were measured in all participants using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Orexin B plasma levels were significantly higher in MDD patients with CT and without CT than that in the healthy control group (P < 0.05), whereas there was no statistical difference between the two depression groups. After adjusting age and BMI for covariates, the LASSO regression revealed significant association between the plasma orexin B levels and the total scores of HAMD (β = 3.348), CTQ (β = 2.005). There was no difference in plasma orexin A levels among three groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although peripheral orexin B levels are associated with the depression, rather than orexin A, CT appear to play a role in the association between orexin B levels and depression. China Clinical Trial Registration Center (Registration No.: ChiCTR2000039692).

Dysregulation of striatal dopamine D2/D3 receptor-mediated by hypocretin induces depressive behaviors in rats

BACKGROUND

The dysregulation of the dopamine system contributes to depressive-like behaviors in rats, and the neurological functions regulated by hypocretin are severely affected in depression. However, whether suvorexant plays a role in alleviating depression by affecting the dopamine system is unclear.

METHODS

To preliminarily explore the mechanism of suvorexant (10 mg/kg) in the treatment of depression, the mRNA and protein expression of TH, Drd2, Drd3, GluN2A, DAT, and GluN2B in the striatum of rats was quantified by qPCR and western blotting. The plasma hypocretin-1 and dopamine levels and the striatal dopamine levels were determined by ELISA.

RESULTS

i) Compared to those of the control group, chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) rats showed depressive-like behaviors, which were subsequently reversed by treatment with suvorexant. ii) The mRNA and protein expressions of TH, Drd2, Drd3, GluN2A, and GluN2B in the striatum of CUMS were significantly increased compared with those in the controls, but decreased after suvorexant treatment. iii) Compared with those in the control group, the plasma and striatal dopamine levels of CUMS decreased while plasma hypocretin-1 levels increased, which was reversed after suvorexant treatment.

LIMITATIONS

i) The suvorexant is a dual hypocretin receptor antagonist; however, the responsible receptor is unclear. ii) We only focused on related factors in the striatum but did not explore other brain regions, nor did we directly explore the relationship among these factors.

CONCLUSION

Depressive-like behaviors induced by CUMS can be reversed by suvorexant, and the therapeutic effects of suvorexant may be mediated by affecting the dopamine system.

Investigational Drugs for the Treatment of Depression (Part 1): Monoaminergic, Orexinergic, GABA-Ergic, and Anti-Inflammatory Agents

Therapeutic management of depression has currently important limitations, and its low efficacy is reflected in high rates of non-response even after multiple trials of antidepressants. Almost two-thirds of the patients diagnosed with major depression who received a 4–6 weeks trial of antidepressant could not reach remission, and more than 30% of these patients are considered treatment-resistant. In bipolar depression, the situation is also discouraging if we analyze the high suicide rate, the risk for the treatment-emergent affective switch when antidepressants are added, the high rate of treatment resistance (up to 25%), and the severe functional impairments associated with these episodes. Therefore, new therapeutic agents are needed, as well as new pathogenetic models for depression. The vast majority of the currently approved antidepressants are based on the monoamine hypothesis, although new drugs exploiting different neurotransmitter pathways have been recently approved by FDA. Brexanolone, an allopregnanolone analog, is an example of such new antidepressants, and its approval for post-partum depression inspired the search for a new generation of neurosteroids and GABA-ergic modulators, with an easier way of administration and superior tolerability profile. Orexin receptors antagonists are also extensively studied for different psychiatric disorders, depression included, in phase II trials. Antiinflammatory drugs, both cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors and biological therapy, are investigated in patients with depressive disorders based on the proven correlation between inflammation and mood disorders in preclinical and clinical studies. Also, a new generation of monoamine-based investigational drugs is explored, ranging from triple reuptake inhibitors to atypical antipsychotics, in patients with major depression. In conclusion, there is hope for new treatments in uni- and bipolar depression, as it became clear, after almost seven decades, that new pathogenetic pathways should be targeted to increase these patients’ response rate.