Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Paliperidone 6-Month Formulation: An Open-Label 2-Year Extension of a 1-Year Double-Blind Study in Adult Participants With Schizophrenia

Indifferent minds, broken system: a critical examination of mental health care provision for Spain's incarcerated population with serious mental illnesses

Background

Spain healthcare system is decentralized, with seventeen autonomous regions overseeing healthcare. However, penitentiary healthcare is managed nationally, except in Catalonia, the Basque Country, and Navarra. These variations impact mental health care provision for inmates with serious mental illness (SMI).

Objective

To delineate differences between regions in terms of mental health care provision for individuals with SMI, available resources, and the perspectives of healthcare professionals operating in the Spanish prison environment.

Methods

Employing an explanatory sequential mixed-method approach, the study conducted an extensive literature review, quantitative data collection through structured questionnaires, and qualitative data collection via focus groups and four in-depth interviews. Analysis involved calculating percentages and ratios for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data interpretation to comprehensively understand mental healthcare provision.

Results

In December 2021, about 4% of inmates in Spain had SMI. There are three distinct models of mental healthcare within the Spanish prison system. The traditional penitentiary model, representing 83% of the incarcerated population, operates independently under the General Secretariat of Penitentiary Institutions at a national level. This model relies on an average of 5.2 penitentiary General Practitioners (pGP) per 1,000 inmates for psychiatric and general healthcare. External psychiatrists are engaged for part-time psychiatric assessment. Acute psychiatric hospitalization occurs in general nursing modules within penitentiary centers or in Restricted Access Units (RAUs) in reference hospitals. Two penitentiary psychiatric hospitals provide care to unimputable SMI inmates from all over Spain. Innovative penitentiary models, constituting 17% of the prison population, integrate penitentiary healthcare within regional public health systems. The Basque Country features a Mental Health Unit with full-time care teams within the penitentiary center. Catalonia emphasizes community care, providing full-time dedicated psychiatric services within and outside prisons, ensuring continued care in the community. Both models prioritize personnel with specialized mental health training and compensation akin to non-prison healthcare settings.

Conclusions

Regional disparities in penitentiary mental healthcare models in Spain result in resource inequalities, impacting specialized care for inmates with SMI and opportunities for healthcare professionals. The models in the Basque Country and Catalonia offer valuable experiences for penitentiary healthcare.

Transformative Outcomes With Paliperidone Long-Acting Injection in Severe Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Case Report and Literature Review

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) presents considerable challenges in contemporary psychiatric practice due to inadequate response to conventional antipsychotic treatments. Paliperidone, the primary active metabolite of risperidone, particularly in its long-acting injectable (LAI) form, has emerged as a promising option for TRS due to its consistent medication delivery, reducing symptom exacerbation and relapse associated with oral dosing fluctuations. This case report presents the clinical journey of a 42-year-old female diagnosed with schizophrenia at age 15. Despite numerous hospital admissions and trials of various oral and injectable antipsychotics, including clozapine and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), her symptoms persisted. During her last admission, her condition showed minimal improvement despite extensive pharmacological interventions. Introducing paliperidone LAI while tapering off other antipsychotics led to significant improvements within four weeks. The patient exhibited reduced hallucinatory behaviour, delusions, and disorganized behaviour. Follow-up assessments confirmed sustained progress, with the patient showing increased engagement in daily activities and reduced irritability and suspiciousness. This case underscores the potential efficacy of paliperidone LAI in managing TRS. The patient's notable improvement highlights the importance of personalized treatment plans and continuous monitoring in complex psychiatric conditions. Its favourable safety and tolerability profile further supports its use as a long-term treatment option for TRS, potentially leading to enhanced patient compliance and overall quality of life. The significant symptomatic relief and functional improvement observed advocate for the consideration of paliperidone LAI as a promising therapeutic option for TRS, with the potential to be considered in the future among the first-line treatments for TRS.

Three-Year Outcomes of 6-Month Paliperidone Palmitate in Adults With Schizophrenia: An Open-Label Extension Study of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics have the potential to improve adherence and symptom control in patients with schizophrenia, promoting long-term recovery. Paliperidone palmitate (PP) once every 6 months is the first and currently only LAI antipsychotic with an extended dosing interval of 6 months.

Objective

To assess long-term outcomes of PP received once every 6 months in adults with schizophrenia.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In a 2-year open-label extension (OLE) study of a 1-year randomized clinical trial (RCT), eligible adults with schizophrenia could choose to continue PP every 6 months if they had not experienced relapse after receiving PP once every 3 or 6 months in the 1-year, international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized noninferiority trial. The present analysis focused on patients receiving PP every 6 months in the double-blind trial through the OLE study (November 20, 2017, to May 3, 2022).

Intervention

Patients received a dorsogluteal injection of PP on day 1 and once every 6 months up to month 30.

Main Outcomes and Measures

End points included assessment of relapse and change from the double-blind trial baseline to the OLE end point in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and subscale, Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, and Personal Social Performance (PSP) Scale scores. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), injection site evaluations, and laboratory tests were also assessed.

Results

Among 121 patients (83 [68.6%] male), mean (SD) age at baseline was 38.6 (11.24) years and mean (SD) duration of illness was 11.0 (9.45) years. At screening of the double-blind study, 101 patients (83.5%) were taking an oral antipsychotic and 20 (16.5%) were taking an LAI antipsychotic. Altogether, 5 of 121 patients (4.1%) experienced relapse during the 3-year follow-up; reasons for relapse were psychiatric hospitalization (2 [1.7%]), suicidal or homicidal ideation (2 [1.7%]), and deliberate self-injury (1 [0.8%]). Patients treated with PP every 6 months were clinically and functionally stable, and outcomes were well maintained, evidenced by stable scores on the PANSS (mean [SD] change, -2.6 [9.96] points), CGI-S (mean [SD] change, -0.2 [0.57] points), and PSP (mean [SD] change, 3.1 [9.14] points) scales over the 3-year period. In total, 101 patients (83.5%) completed the 2-year OLE. At least 1 TEAE was reported in 97 of 121 patients (80.2%) overall; no new safety or tolerability concerns were identified.

Conclusions and Relevance

In a 2-year OLE study of a 1-year RCT, results supported favorable long-term outcomes of PP once every 6 months for up to 3 years in adults with schizophrenia.

Evaluating the 6-month formulation of paliperidone palmitate: a twice-yearly injectable treatment for schizophrenia in adults

INTRODUCTION

Paliperidone Palmitate is the only antipsychotic that has been developed in three different intramuscular long-acting injectable (LAI) dosing regimen: monthly (PP1M), quarterly (PP3M), and from 2020 also twice-yearly (PP6M). The latter was approved for the maintenance treatment of adults with schizophrenia and clinically stabilized with PP1M or PP3M.

AREAS COVERED

Data from studies evaluating efficacy in the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia with PP6M are reviewed. Since no post-marketing safety studies are currently available, data from spontaneous reporting system databases, FAERS and Eudravigilance, are analyzed and the reported treatment-emergent adverse events of PP6M are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The efficacy of PP6M is comparable to that of PP3M in terms of relapses prevention in patients with schizophrenia previously stabilized on PP3M or PP1M. Also, the maintenance of clinical efficacy in the long term has been demonstrated. Data from pharmacovigilance analyses, as well as from phase 3 studies, show that PP6M is generally well tolerated, consistently with PP3M safety data. PP6M allows a longer dosing interval than any other LAI antipsychotics, potentially reducing nonadherence and disease relapses. In future, an increase in the prescription rates of PP6M is expected and real-world efficacy and tolerability studies will be conducted.

Relapse Rates With Paliperidone Palmitate in Adult Patients With Schizophrenia: Results for the 6-Month Formulation From an Open-label Extension Study Compared to Real-World Data for the 1-Month and 3-Month Formulations

BACKGROUND

The 3 paliperidone palmitate (PP) long-acting injectable antipsychotic formulations, PP 1-month (PP1M), PP 3-month (PP3M), and PP 6-month (PP6M), have shown to reduce the risk of relapse in schizophrenia. The current phase-4 study constructed external comparator arms (ECAs) using real-world data for PP3M and PP1M and compared relapse prevention rates with PP6M from an open-label extension (OLE) study in adult patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

PP6M data were derived from a single-arm, 24-month, OLE study (NCT04072575), which included patients with schizophrenia who completed a 12-month randomized, double-blind, noninferiority, phase-3 study (NCT03345342) without relapse. Patients in the PP3M and PP1M ECAs were identified from the IBM® MarketScan® Multistate Medicaid Database based on similar eligibility criteria as the PP6M cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients were included in each cohort following propensity score matching. Most patients were men (>70%; mean age: 39-41 years). Time to relapse (primary analysis based on Kaplan-Meier estimates) was significantly delayed in the PP6M cohort (P < .001, log-rank test). The relapse rate was lower in the PP6M cohort (3.9%) vs PP3M (20.2%) and PP1M (29.8%) cohorts. Risk of relapse decreased significantly (P < .001) by 82% for PP6M vs PP3M (HR = 0.18 [95% CI = 0.08 to 0.40]), 89% for PP6M vs PP1M (HR = 0.11 [0.05 to 0.25]), and 35% for PP3M vs PP1M (HR = 0.65 [0.42 to 0.99]; P = .043). Sensitivity analysis confirmed findings from the primary analysis. Although the ECAs were matched to mimic the characteristics of the PP6M cohort, heterogeneity between the groups could exist due to factors including prior study participation, unmeasured confounders, variations in data capture and quality, and completeness of clinical information.

CONCLUSIONS

In a clinical trial setting, PP6M significantly delayed time to relapse and demonstrated lower relapse rates compared with PP3M and PP1M treatments in real-world settings among adult patients with schizophrenia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04072575; EudraCT number: 2018-004532-30.