Cytomegalovirus resistant to foscarnet: clinicovirologic correlation in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus

Current and potential therapies for the treatment of herpes-virus infections

Human herpesviruses are found worldwide and are among the most frequent causes of viral infections in immunocompetent as well as in immunocompromised patients. During the past decade and a half a better understanding of the replication and disease-causing state of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), varicella zoster virus (VZV), and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) has been achieved due in part to the development of potent antiviral compounds that target these viruses. While some of these antiviral therapies are considered safe and efficacious (acyclovir, penciclovir), some have toxicities associated with them (ganciclovir and foscarnet). In addition, the increased and prolonged use of these compounds in the clinical setting, especially for the treatment of immunocompromised patients, has led to the emergence of viral resistance against most of these drugs. While resistance is not a serious issue for immunocompetent individuals, it is a real concern for immunocompromised patients, especially those with AIDS and the ones that have undergone organ transplantation. All the currently approved treatments target the viral DNA polymerase. It is clear that new drugs that are more efficacious than the present ones, are not toxic, and target a different viral function would be of great use especially for immunocompromised patients. Here, an overview is provided of the diseases caused by the herpesviruses as well as the replication strategy of the better studied members of this family for which treatments are available. We also discuss the various drugs that have been approved for the treatment of some herpesviruses in terms of structure, mechanism of action, and development of resistance. Finally, we present a discussion of viral targets other than the DNA polymerase, for which new antiviral compounds are being considered.

Current and potential therapies for the treatment of herpesvirus infections

Human herpesviruses are found worldwide and are among the most frequent causes of viral infections in immunocompetent as well as in immunocompromised patients. During the past decade and a half a better understanding of the replication and disease causing state of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) has been achieved due in part to the development of potent antiviral compounds that target these viruses. While some of these antiviral therapies are considered safe and efficacious (acyclovir, penciclovir), some have toxicities associated with them (ganciclovir and foscarnet). In addition, the increased and prolonged use of these compounds in the clinical setting, especially for the treatment of immunocompromised patients, has led to the emergence of viral resistance against most of these drugs. While resistance is not a serious issue for immunocompetent individuals, it is a real concern for immunocompromised patients, especially those with AIDS and the ones that have undergone organ transplantation. All the currently approved treatments target the viral DNA polymerase. It is clear that new drugs that are more efficacious than the present ones, are not toxic, and target a different viral function would be of great use especially for immunocompromised patients. Here, we provide an overview of the diseases caused by the herpesviruses as well as the replication strategy of the better studiedmembers of this family for which treatments are available. We also discuss the various drugs that have been approved for the treatment of some herpesviruses in terms of structure, mechanism of action, and development of resistance. Finally, we present a discussion of viral targets other than the DNA polymerase, for which new antiviral compounds are being considered.

Current and potential therapies for the treatment of herpesvirus infections

Human herpesviruses are found worldwide and are among the most frequent causes of viral infections in immunocompetent as well as in immunocompromised patients. During the past decade and a half a better understanding of the replication and disease causing state of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) has been achieved due in part to the development of potent antiviral compounds that target these viruses. While some of these antiviral therapies are considered safe and efficacious (acyclovir, penciclovir), some have toxicities associated with them (ganciclovir and foscarnet). In addition, the increased and prolonged use of these compounds in the clinical setting, especially for the treatment of immunocompromised patients, has led to the emergence of viral resistance against most of these drugs. While resistance is not a serious issue for immunocompetent individuals, it is a real concern for immunocompromised patients, especially those with AIDS and the ones that have undergone organ transplantation. All the currently approved treatments target the viral DNA polymerase. It is clear that new drugs that are more efficacious than the present ones, are not toxic, and target a different viral function would be of great use especially for immunocompromised patients. Here, we provide an overview of the diseases caused by the herpesviruses as well as the replication strategy of the better studied members of this family for which treatments are available. We also discuss the various drugs that have been approved for the treatment of some herpesviruses in terms of structure, mechanism of action, and development of resistance. Finally, we present a discussion of viral targets other than the DNA polymerase, for which new antiviral compounds are being considered.

A standardized plaque reduction assay for determination of drug susceptibilities of cytomegalovirus clinical isolates

Twelve laboratories collaborated in formulating and testing a standardized plaque reduction assay for cytomegalovirus (CMV) cell-associated clinical isolates. Four characterized and plaque-purified CMV strains, as well as six coded clinical isolates obtained after antiviral therapy, were distributed and tested. Good agreement was obtained for four of the clinical isolates, but a broad distribution of results was obtained for two isolates. Analysis of these results indicates the problems associated with clinical isolates, including the large genetic variability and the highly cell-associated phenotype. This collaborative effort, by addressing these problems, represents a significant step toward the development of a standardized assay.

Effect of desferrioxamine (DFO) and calcium trinatrium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) on rat cytomegalovirus replication in vitro and in vivo

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major problem in the immunosuppressed patient. It is thought that besides direct CMV induced cell lysis, immunological damage is part of CMV pathogenesis. New antiviral drugs, which combine immunomodulating and antiviral qualities, could be beneficial. Recently, it has been described that desferrioxamine (DFO) and calcium trinatrium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) exhibit both properties. In this report the antiviral effects of both compounds against rat CMV (RCMV) are described in vitro and in vivo using a generalised and local infection model. In vitro, both compounds exhibited a significant antiviral effect, DTPA being more potent than DFO. However, in the generalised infection model no effect was seen on mortality, morbidity or presence of virus in internal organs. In rats infected subcutaneously in the hind paw, no effect was seen locally on paw thickness, presence of viral antigens and inflammatory response. In addition, these rats suffered from a generalised infection of low magnitude at 15 days post infection, although both DFO and DTPA were able to lower the level of viral replication. In conclusion, our data indicate that despite in vitro activity, in vivo usage of DFO or DTPA for acute CMV infection is not warranted.

Incidence of foscarnet resistance and cidofovir resistance in patients treated for cytomegalovirus retinitis. The Cytomegalovirus Retinitis and Viral Resistance Study Group

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is a common opportunistic infection in patients with AIDS. With long-term therapy for CMV retinitis, resistant CMV may develop. In a prospective study of 122 patients with CMV retinitis, 2.4 and 0.8% of patients had foscarnet-resistant blood culture isolates (50% inhibitory concentration [IC50], >400 microM) and urine culture isolates, respectively, at diagnosis of CMV retinitis prior to treatment, whereas 4.1 and 6.6% had cidofovir-resistant (IC50, >2 microM) blood and urine culture isolates, respectively. Patients were treated according to best medical judgement. Of 44 foscarnet-treated patients, 26% had a resistant blood or urine culture isolate by 6 months of treatment and 37% had a resistant isolate by 9 months; of 13 cidofovir-treated patients, 29% had a resistant blood or urine culture isolate by 3 months of therapy. The probabilities of developing foscarnet resistance while on foscarnet and developing cidofovir resistance while on cidofovir were not significantly different from that for developing ganciclovir resistance while on ganciclovir (odds ratios, 1.87 [P = 0.19] and 2.28 [P = 0.15], respectively).

What clinicians need to know about antiviral drugs and viral resistance

The development of safe and effective antiviral therapies for the management of a variety of viral infections has expanded tremendously in recent years. Treatment is now possible for serious and potentially life-threatening infections with herpesviruses, respiratory viruses such as influenza A and respiratory syncytial virus, and the human immunodeficiency virus. The increased availability and use of antiviral drugs, however, has led to the emergence of drug-resistant viruses, especially in immunocompromised hosts. With this review, the major antiviral agents are presented with a description of the mechanisms of action, the evolution of drug resistance, and the need for in vitro antiviral susceptibility testing.

Antiviral susceptibility testing-flow cytometric analysis (AST-FCA) for the detection of cytomegalovirus drug resistance

Antiviral susceptibility testing-flow cytometric analysis (AST-FCA), an application of flow cytometry in conjunction with cell culture, was developed to identify susceptibility of cytomegalovirus (CMV) isolates to the antiviral drugs ganciclovir (GCV) and foscarnet (PFA). The viral isolates used in this study were obtained from peripheral blood of AIDS patients. Among GCV-susceptible strains, the mean 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) using AST-FCA was 18 microns (SI50 = 1.4). Among GCV resistant strains, the mean IC50 was 47 microns (SI50 = 3.6). For PFA, the mean IC50 was 80 microns (SI50 = 1.0) for susceptible strains. IC50s for strains resistant to PFA, showed no significant reduction of infectivity at the highest drug concentration (i.e., 200 microns PFA) tested. Additional analyses confirmed the accuracy of AST-FCA by parallel testing using plaque reduction assay. AST-FCA is a novel, nonisotopic, and relatively simple to perform laboratory procedure for the identification of CMV drug-resistant strains.

Ophthalmic complications of HIV infection

HIV retinopathy, a noninfectious microangiopathy, is the most common ocular manifestation of HIV infection. Opportunistic infections, neoplasms, neuro-ophthalmic lesions, and drug-induced lesions may also cause ocular problems. Opportunistic ocular infections, particularly CMV retinitis, are a major cause of morbidity in patients with AIDS. Because of the underlying chronic and progressive immune dysfunction, the ocular symptoms, signs, clinical course, and treatment are often atypical and severe, requiring protracted medical therapy.

Herpesvirus resistance to antiviral drugs: a review of the mechanisms, clinical importance and therapeutic options

During the past decade, potent agents against herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 and 2, varicella zoster virus (VZV), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) have become available. The increasing clinical use of acyclovir, ganciclovir, and foscarnet has been associated with the emergence of drug-resistant herpesvirus strains. Resistance to acyclovir or ganciclovir most frequently results from deficient intracellular phosphorylation of these agents which is required for drug activation. Resistance to foscarnet is due to viral DNA polymerase mutants that permit viral replication despite the presence of the drug. In immunocompetent patients, herpesvirus resistance is rare and generally does not correlate with clinical outcome. In contrast, in immunocompromised hosts, resistance of HSV, VZV, and CMV is increasingly detected, and may be associated with disease refractory to antiviral therapy. Foscarnet treatment has been used with some clinical benefit in patients with acyclovir-resistant HSV or VZV, or ganciclovir-resistant CMV. For therapy of resistant mucocutaneous HSV disease, topical trifluorothymidine, and topical or intravenous cidofovir (HPMPC) have yielded encouraging results that warrant further investigation. Improved methods for detection of herpesvirus resistance, and validation of alternative therapy for patients with documented resistance are required to reduce the clinical impact of drug-resistant herpesviruses.

Potent anti-murine cytomegalovirus activity and reduced nephrotoxicity of ganciclovir cyclic phosphonate

Ganciclovir cyclic phosphonate (SR3775) is a derivative of the R enantiomer (SR3773) of ganciclovir phosphonate (9-[((+/-)-1-hydroxymethyl-3-phosphono)propyloxymethyl]guanine), both of which are potent inhibitors of human ctyomegalovirus and murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV). Against wild-type and four drug-resistant strains of MCMV, SR3773 was 2.3- to 3-fold more potent than SR3775. SR3775 was about half as active as SR3773 against MCMV infections in severe combined immunodeficient mice. However, whereas SR3773 caused 20 to 30% destruction of renal tubules at 50 mg/kg of body weight per day (but exerted no toxicity at 25 mg/kg/day), SR3775 showed no deleterious renal effects at 600 mg/kg/day over 14 days. SR3775 has a therapeutic index at least 12 times higher than SR3773 in mice, making it a candidate for the treatment of human cytomegalovirus disease.

Double resistance to ganciclovir and foscarnet of four human cytomegalovirus strains recovered from AIDS patients

Four human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) isolates from four different AIDS patients treated with both ganciclovir and foscarnet and not responding clinically to antiviral treatment, were studied in order to verify the occurrence of double resistance to both drugs, and to define whether single or multiple HCMV strains could be responsible for the double resistance. Peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL), the relevant conventional viral isolates, and plaque-purified strains from all four patients were examined by antiviral drug susceptibility testing by an immediate-early antigen plaque reduction assay and by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified multiple genome regions and endonucleases. All four HCMV strains had a high level of resistance to both ganciclovir and foscarnet. A single HCMV strain was shown to be responsible for the dual resistance in each patient. HCMV strain identity and uniqueness were shown for each of the four patients in blood samples, viral isolates, and plaque-purified strains. In addition, in two patients the same single HCMV strain shifted progressively from drug sensitivity to ganciclovir and then to ganciclovir-foscarnet resistance. These findings document that resistance to both ganciclovir and foscarnet of HCMV strains recovered from blood of AIDS patients represents an emerging problem. Although it is known that multiple HCMV strains may cocirculate in the blood of AIDS patients, single strains appear to be responsible for the dual resistance. Molecular mechanisms responsible for the double resistance of the four reported strains are under study.

Viral sensitivity testing in patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis clinically resistant to foscarnet or ganciclovir

PURPOSE

Resistance to antiviral therapy is a potential cause of progression of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. We investigated the results of viral sensitivity testing in a series of patients with clinically resistant retinitis who had positive results of blood or urine cytomegalovirus cultures.

METHODS

All patients with newly diagnosed cytomegalovirus retinitis between January 1990 and December 1991 were prospectively studied. Blood and urine cultures for cytomegalovirus were obtained in a nonrandomized subgroup of this group. The results of in vitro sensitivity to foscarnet and ganciclovir, determined by a DNA hybridization assay, were then analyzed in seven patients with clinically resistant cytomegalovirus retinitis and whose blood or urine culture results, or both, were positive for cytomegalovirus while on a treatment regimen.

RESULTS

Foscarnet-resistant cytomegalovirus (ID50 > 300 microM) was isolated from two patients, one of whom was being treated with foscarnet. Ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus (ID 50 > 6.0 microM) was isolated from four patients, three of whom were being treated with ganciclovir. Foscarnet- and ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus occurred with previous ganciclovir therapy in one patient. Clinical improvement occurred in three patients whose change in therapy was based on viral sensitivity testing. In general, prolonged therapy with one drug was associated with a progressive increase in the ID 50 for that drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Viral resistance to foscarnet or ganciclovir may explain refractory cytomegalovirus retinitis in some patients.

[Current status of human cytomegalovirus disease]

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) can establish lifelong persistence after primary infection with reactivation occurring as a result of immunosuppression. There is much evidence that molecular interactions between the immune system and the HCMV are responsible for immune escape. HCMV in many cells especially in mononuclear blood cells during latency are frequently the source of transmission and spreading and results in a variety of disorders. In this review some data about acute infection in immunocompetent host (mononucleosis, hepatitis), about intrauterine HCMV infection, about infection and endogenous reinfection in bone marrow and solid organ transplant recipients (pneumonitis) and about HCMV disease in AIDS patients (encephalitis, neuropathy, retinitis, colitis) are investigated. Moreover, HCMV associated vasculitis is described in patients with myocarditis, rheumatoid arthritis or polyradiculopathy. HCMV could play an important role in atherosclerosis. Several types of human malignancy have been linked to HCMV and it has been shown that HCMV ie genes upregulate expression of cellular oncogenes. The diagnosis of HCMV infection is carried out by viremia in cell culture using immediate early antigen staining, by antigenaemia which appears to be an early quantitative and predictive tool, by HCMV DNA detection using hybridization and PCR, and by IgM and IgG antibody evaluation. Two antiviral drugs are used for treatment: ganciclovir and phosphonoformic acid; few resistant clinical isolates have been reported. Specific gammaglobulin activity is discussed. HCMV vaccine is not available.

Rapid screening for resistance to ganciclovir and foscarnet of primary isolates of human cytomegalovirus from culture-positive blood samples

A rapid screening assay for the detection of resistance to ganciclovir and foscarnet of primary isolates of human cytomegalovirus from culture-positive blood samples was developed by using single doses of both drugs and an immediate-early antigen plaque reduction assay. Results of the rapid assay with peripheral blood leukocytes as the viral inoculum were compared with those of a conventional assay with cell-free virus from the relevant viral isolates. Both assays gave overlapping results. The rapid assay offers the following major advantages: (i) it provides results within 4 to 6 days, (ii) it can be performed with peripheral blood leukocytes, and (iii) it reliably detects drug-resistant human cytomegalovirus strains.

Nucleotide analogs related to acyclovir and ganciclovir are effective against murine cytomegalovirus infections in BALB/c and severe combined immunodeficient mice

Acyclovir phosphonate [9-(3-phosphono-propyloxymethyl)guanine; SR3722] and the S enantiomer (SR3772), R enantiomer (SR3773), and R,S enantiomeric mixture (SR3745A) of ganciclovir phosphonate (9-[((+/-)-1-hydroxymethyl-3-phosphono)propyloxymethyl]guanine) were evaluated for their antiviral activities against murine cytomegalovirus. In severe combined immunodeficient mice infected with murine cytomegalovirus, SR3773 and SR3745A (12.5, 25, and 50 mg/kg of body weight per day) were superior to ganciclovir in extending the mean time to death, whereas SR3722 and SR3772 was less potent than ganciclovir. In normal BALB/c mice, SR3773 and ganciclovir were approximately equally active in preventing death. SR3773 caused renal tubular damage when administered at 50 mg/kg/day for 15 days. These results suggest that SR3773 may have potential for use in the treatment of human cytomegalovirus infections, but it may also exhibit renal toxicity.

Ganciclovir. An update of its therapeutic use in cytomegalovirus infection

The antiviral nucleoside analogue ganciclovir has demonstrated in vitro activity against human cytomegalovirus and effectively treats infection caused by this organism in various immunocompromised patient groups. The drug prolongs time to progression in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related cytomegalovirus retinitis although life-long maintenance therapy is required. Direct comparisons between ganciclovir and foscarnet in this indication are few; nevertheless, the 2 drugs appear to have equal therapeutic efficacy in treating cytomegalovirus retinitis although results from 1 study in this indication suggest that foscarnet has an advantage in terms of patient survival. AIDS-related gastrointestinal and, to a lesser extent, pulmonary cytomegalovirus infection also respond to treatment with ganciclovir; maintenance therapy does not appear to be required in these latter 2 indications. Ganciclovir is also useful against cytomegalovirus infection in organ transplant recipients. The drug is most effective when given prophylactically or as early treatment for asymptomatic infection in bone marrow transplant recipients; treatment of established infection is less effective in this patient group. However, established infection in solid organ transplant recipients appears to respond to treatment with ganciclovir. The most common adverse event during ganciclovir therapy is haematological toxicity but this appears to be readily reversible on discontinuation of the drug. In addition, coadministration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF) has been shown to prevent ganciclovir-associated neutropenia. Thus, ganciclovir is a valuable treatment for cytomegalovirus infection in patients with AIDS and in organ transplant recipients. Further studies comparing ganciclovir and foscarnet-ideally incorporating the use of G-CSF or GM-CSF to prevent ganciclovir-associated neutropenia and assessing survival as 1 endpoint--should further clarify the relative role of ganciclovir as treatment or prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection.

Foscarnet and ganciclovir combination therapy for CMV disease in HIV-infected patients

An open prospective trial of combined ganciclovir and foscarnet therapy for 3 weeks was initiated in 14 episodes of severe CMV-disease in 13 HIV-infected patients (all CDC class IV, age 30-42, median 34 years, CD4+ cell count 0-80, median 10/microliters). In seven episodes of gastrointestinal disease (five colitis, two esophagitis) remission of symptoms and mucosal changes was achieved in five. In seven episodes of retinitis, scarring was achieved in six. Renal toxicity was seen in two patients, moderate hematologic toxicity in eight patients. Overall efficacy was comparable to monotherapy; no new toxicities were seen with the combination of these two drugs.