Shapiro SB, Laurie C, El-Zein M, Franco EL. Association between male circumcision and human papillomavirus infection in males and females: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
Clin Microbiol Infect 2023:S1198-743X(23)00149-0. [PMID:
37011808 DOI:
10.1016/j.cmi.2023.03.028]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Previous studies have suggested a protective effect of male circumcision on human papillomavirus (HPV) infections in males, and that this protection may be conferred to their female sexual partners.
OBJECTIVES
To synthesize the available evidence on the association between male circumcision and HPV infections in males and females.
DATA SOURCES
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, LILACS, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global for records published up to 22 June 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY
We considered observational and experimental studies that assessed male circumcision status and HPV prevalence, incidence, or clearance in males or females for inclusion.
PARTICIPANTS
Males and their female sexual partners who were tested for genital HPV infection.
INTERVENTIONS
Male circumcision compared to no circumcision.
RISK OF BIAS ASSESSMENT
The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for observational studies and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used for randomized trials.
DATA SYNTHESIS
We estimated summary measures of effect and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the prevalence, incidence, and clearance of HPV infections in males and females using random-effects meta-analysis. We assessed effect modification of circumcision on HPV prevalence by penile site in males using random-effects meta-regression.
RESULTS
Across 32 studies, male circumcision was associated with decreased odds of prevalent HPV infections (OR 0.45, CI 0.34-0.61), a reduced incidence rate of HPV infections (IRR 0.69, CI 0.57-0.83), and an increased risk of clearing HPV infections (RR 1.44, CI 1.28-1.61) at the glans penis among male subjects. Circumcision conferred greater protection against infection at the glans than shaft (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.98). Females with circumcised partners were protected from all outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
Male circumcision may protect against various HPV infection outcomes, suggesting its prophylactic potential. Understanding site-specific effects of circumcision on HPV infection prevalence has important implications for studies of HPV transmission.
Collapse