Safety and Immunogenicity of a ChAd155-Vectored Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine in Infants 6-7 Months of age: A Phase 1/2 Randomized Trial

Safety and immunogenicity of a ChAd155-vectored rabies vaccine compared with inactivated, purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine in healthy adults

BACKGROUND

Rabies is a zoonotic viral encephalitis that is endemic in many countries and confers a high mortality. Licensed vaccines require several doses to ensure efficacy. To investigate a logistically favorable approach, we assessed the safety and immunogenicity of ChAd155-RG, a novel investigational rabies vaccine using a replication-defective chimpanzee adenovirus vector.

METHODS

We conducted a first-in-human, phase 1, randomized, double-blind, dose-escalation trial comparing ChAd155-RG with a licensed inactivated vaccine (RabAvert) in healthy adults. Participants received either RabAvert at standard dosing or ChAd155-RG at a low dose for one immunization or a high dose for one or two immunizations. To assess safety, we evaluated reactogenicity, unsolicited adverse events, and thrombotic events. To measure immunogenicity, we measured rabies viral neutralizing antibody (VNA) titers and anti-ChAd155 neutralizing antibodies.

RESULTS

Mild to moderate systemic reactogenicity and transient lymphopenia and neutropenia were more common among recipients of ChAd155-RG compared with those who received RabAvert. No thrombotic events or serious adverse events were reported. Only the groups receiving RabAvert or two doses of high-dose ChAd155-RG achieved 100 % seroconversion, and seroprotection was most durable in the RabAvert group. Most participants had preexisting anti-vector antibodies, which were boosted by ChAd155-RG. Baseline and post-vaccination anti-vector antibody titers were negatively associated with post-vaccination rabies VNA titers.

CONCLUSIONS

In this phase 1 clinical trial, a novel rabies vaccine using a simian adenovirus vector was safe and tolerable, but generated lower, less durable rabies VNA titers than a standard inactivated rabies virus vaccine, which may be due to preexisting, anti-vector immunity.

Immune Responses to Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines: Advances and Challenges

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a leading cause of acute respiratory infections, particularly in children and the elderly. This virus primarily infects ciliated epithelial cells and activates alveolar macrophages and dendritic cells, triggering an innate antiviral response that releases pro-inflammatory cytokines. However, immunity generated by infection is limited, often leading to reinfection throughout life. This review focuses on the immune response elicited by newly developed and approved vaccines against RSV. A comprehensive search of clinical studies on RSV vaccine candidates conducted between 2013 and 2024 was performed. There are three primary target groups for RSV vaccines: pediatric populations, infants through maternal immunization, and the elderly. Different vaccine approaches address these groups, including subunit, live attenuated or chimeric, vector-based, and mRNA vaccines. To date, subunit RSV vaccines and the mRNA vaccine have been approved using the pre-fusion conformation of the F protein, which has been shown to induce strong immune responses. Nevertheless, several other vaccine candidates face challenges, such as modest increases in antibody production, highlighting the need for further research. Despite the success of the approved vaccines for adults older than 60 years and pregnant women, there remains a critical need for vaccines that can protect children older than six months, who are still highly vulnerable to RSV infections.

Whole-Genome Sequencing and Genetic Diversity of Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Patients with Influenza-like Illness in Sicily (Italy) from 2017 to 2023

Monitoring the genetic variability of human respiratory syncytial virus (hRSV) is of paramount importance, especially for the potential implication of key antigenic mutations on the emergence of immune escape variants. Thus, to describe the genetic diversity and evolutionary dynamics of hRSV circulating in Sicily (Italy), a total of 153 hRSV whole-genome sequences collected from 770 hRSV-positive subjects between 2017 and 2023, before the introduction of expanded immunization programs into the population, were investigated. The phylogenetic analyses indicated that the genotypes GA.2.3.5 (ON1) for hRSV-A and GB.5.0.5a (BA9) for hRSV-B co-circulated in our region. Amino acid (AA) substitutions in the surface and internal proteins were evaluated, including the F protein antigenic sites, as the major targets of immunoprophylactic monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. Overall, the proportion of AA changes ranged between 1.5% and 22.6% among hRSV-A, whereas hRSV-B varied in the range 0.8-16.9%; the latter was more polymorphic than hRSV-A within the key antigenic sites. No AA substitutions were found at site III of both subgroups. Although several non-synonymous mutations were found, none of the polymorphisms known to potentially affect the efficacy of current preventive measures were documented. These findings provide new insights into the global hRSV molecular epidemiology and highlight the importance of defining a baseline genomic picture to monitor for future changes that might be induced by the selective pressures of immunological preventive measures, which will soon become widely available.

Vaccination for Respiratory Syncytial Virus: A Narrative Review and Primer for Clinicians

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) poses a significant burden on public health, causing lower respiratory tract infections in infants, young children, older adults, and immunocompromised individuals. Recent development and licensure of effective RSV vaccines provide a promising approach to lessening the associated morbidity and mortality of severe infections. This narrative review aims to empower clinicians with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions regarding RSV vaccination, focusing on the prevention and control of RSV infections, especially among vulnerable populations. The paper explores the available RSV vaccines and existing evidence regarding their efficacy and safety in diverse populations. Synthesizing this information for clinicians can help the latter understand the benefits and considerations associated with RSV vaccination, contributing to improved patient care and public health outcomes.