Contribution of Environment Sample-Based Detection to Ebola Outbreak Management

Characterization of Ebola Virus Risk to Bedside Providers in an Intensive Care Environment

Background: The 2014–2016 Ebola outbreak in West Africa recapitulated that nosocomial spread of Ebola virus could occur and that health care workers were at particular risk including notable cases in Europe and North America. These instances highlighted the need for centers to better prepare for potential Ebola virus cases; including understanding how the virus spreads and which interventions pose the greatest risk. Methods: We created a fully equipped intensive care unit (ICU), within a Biosafety Level 4 (BSL4) laboratory, and infected multiple sedated non-human primates (NHPs) with Ebola virus. While providing bedside care, we sampled blood, urine, and gastric residuals; as well as buccal, ocular, nasal, rectal, and skin swabs, to assess the risks associated with routine care. We also assessed the physical environment at end-point. Results: Although viral RNA was detectable in blood as early as three days post-infection, it was not detectable in the urine, gastric fluid, or swabs until late-stage disease. While droplet spread and fomite contamination were present on a few of the surfaces that were routinely touched while providing care in the ICU for the infected animal, these may have been abrogated through good routine hygiene practices. Conclusions: Overall this study has helped further our understanding of which procedures may pose the highest risk to healthcare providers and provides temporal evidence of this over the clinical course of disease.

Challenges and perspectives on the use of mobile laboratories during outbreaks and their use for vaccine evaluation

Mobile laboratories provide diagnostic capabilities for routine surveillance and patient identification during an outbreak. In either situation, they face many challenges including identification of the appropriate assay(s) to employ, logistical arrangements, and providing for the health and safety of the laboratory staff. Great strides have been made over the last decade in the development of mobile laboratories with assays that require minimal infrastructure and technical experience. This knowledge and expertise have been developed in partnership with many researchers and public health officials who live in regions prone to infectious disease outbreaks. Mobile laboratories should now also be used in the evaluation of novel vaccines and therapeutics in remote locations. Clinical mobile laboratories will include similar diagnostic capabilities as outbreak response mobile labs, but will also include additional point-of-care instruments operated under Good Clinical Practice guidelines. They will also operate rigorous data management plans so that the data collected will satisfy regulatory agencies during the licensure process. Failure to deploy an adequate clinical mobile laboratory when administering a novel biological product in a remote location is a significant limitation to any collected scientific data that could ultimately undermine clinical development and availability of life-saving interventions.