Autoimmunity and immunological tolerance in autoimmune bullous diseases

The Discovery of New Antibody in Autoimmune Disease Using a Novel Approach of Coombs Test Based on Flow Cytometry Method

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the antibody to RBC in autoimmune disease patients with ANA using sensitive Coombs test based on flow cytometry method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) of autoimmune disease patients were added to red blood cells (RBCs) of blood group O. At the same time, healthy individuals' serums were also checked. The sample tubes were incubated for 30 min at 37°C. After incubation, each sample was analyzed on flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The agglutination of antinuclear antibodies in autoimmune patients was observed, while in healthy people, there was no agglutination between RBCs and serum. A significant difference was found between the disease group and healthy group (p < 0.0001) showing that a statistical analysis was conducted to compare the presence of ANA agglutination between the two groups. The reported p-value of less than 0.0001 shows that the observed difference is highly significant. The serum stability test conducted over ten consecutive days demonstrated a CV of 6.90% in the test results, indicating favorable stability.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study emphasizes the effectiveness of flow cytometry as a valuable tool for detecting RBC-bound antibodies and new antibodies in autoimmune disease patients. Its high sensitivity and accuracy have the potential to greatly improve diagnostic capabilities in clinical laboratories.

Extracellular vesicles and their cells of origin: Open issues in autoimmune diseases

The conventional therapeutic approaches to treat autoimmune diseases through suppressing the immune system, such as steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, are not adequately practical. Moreover, these regimens are associated with considerable complications. Designing tolerogenic therapeutic strategies based on stem cells, immune cells, and their extracellular vesicles (EVs) seems to open a promising path to managing autoimmune diseases' vast burden. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs), dendritic cells, and regulatory T cells (Tregs) are the main cell types applied to restore a tolerogenic immune status; MSCs play a more beneficial role due to their amenable properties and extensive cross-talks with different immune cells. With existing concerns about the employment of cells, new cell-free therapeutic paradigms, such as EV-based therapies, are gaining attention in this field. Additionally, EVs' unique properties have made them to be known as smart immunomodulators and are considered as a potential substitute for cell therapy. This review provides an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of cell-based and EV-based methods for treating autoimmune diseases. The study also presents an outlook on the future of EVs to be implemented in clinics for autoimmune patients.

Nail changes in pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid: A single-center study in China

Common autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs) include pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid (BP), which are primarily caused by IgG autoantibodies against the structural proteins of desmosomes at the cell–cell junction and hemidesmosomes at the epidermal–dermal junction. Few studies have assessed nail changes in patients with pemphigus or BP. In the present study, we collected the clinical data of 191 patients with AIBDs (108 patients with pemphigus and 83 patients with BP) and 200 control subjects. Nail changes were observed in 77.0% (147/191), 77.8% (84/108), and 75.9% (63/83) of patients with AIBDs, pemphigus, and BP, respectively, and 14.5% (29/200) of control subjects. Beau's lines and paronychia were the most common nail involvement, observed in 22.5% (43/191) and 22.5% (43/191) of patients with AIBDs, 25.0% (27/108) and 25.9% (28/108) of patients with pemphigus, 19.3% (16/83) and 18.1% (15/83) of patients with BP, respectively. The autoimmune bullous skin disorder intensity score (ABSIS) and the onset time of patients with pemphigus or BP with nail changes were different. Onychomycosis accounted for 21.5% (41/191) of all patients with AIBDs. The ABSIS was correlated with nail involvement in patients with BP (r = 0.46, p &lt; 0.001), and weakly correlated with nail involvement in patients with AIBDs (r = 0.37, p &lt; 0.001), pemphigus (r = 0.29, p = 0.009), and pemphigus vulgaris (PV; r = 0.35, p = 0.008). No correlation was observed between nail involvement and disease antibody titers. In conclusion, nail changes are frequently observed in patients with pemphigus and BP. The type and onset time of nail changes may indicate the severity of pemphigus and BP, which warrants the attention of dermatologists.

Immunomodulatory effects of polysaccharides from marine algae for treating cancer, infectious disease, and inflammation

A significant rise in the occurrence and severity of adverse reactions to several synthetic drugs has fueled considerable interest in natural product-based therapeutics. In humans and animals, polysaccharides from marine microalgae and seaweeds have immunomodulatory effects. In addition, these polysaccharides may possess antiviral, anticancer, hypoglycemic, anticoagulant, and antioxidant properties. During inflammatory diseases, such as autoimmune diseases and sepsis, immunosuppressive molecules can serve as therapeutic agents. Similarly, molecules that participate in immune activation can induce immune responses against cancer and infectious diseases. We aim to discuss the chemical composition of the algal polysaccharides, namely alginate, fucoidan, ascophyllan, and porphyran. We also summarize their applications in the treatment of cancer, infectious disease, and inflammation. Recent applications of nanoparticles that are based on algal polysaccharides for the treatment of cancer and inflammatory diseases have also been addressed. In conclusion, these applications of marine algal polysaccharides could provide novel therapeutic alternatives for several diseases.

T-Cell‒Mediated Autoimmunity: Mechanisms and Future Directions

T cells are key drivers of autoimmunity in numerous noncommunicable inflammatory skin diseases by directly harming host tissue or through helping B cells in producing autoantibodies. Technological advances have contributed to identifying autoantigens, the Holy Grail of autoimmunity, in many inflammatory disorders of the skin. Novel therapeutic approaches such as chimeric (auto)antibody receptor T cells are a milestone on the way to finding individualized, well-tolerated, targeted therapies. This review summarizes the current knowledge on pathogenesis, immune response pattern‒related ontology, diagnostic approaches, and treatment options of autoimmune skin diseases.

Loss of AIRE-Mediated Immune Tolerance and the Skin

The core function of the immune response is to distinguish between self and foreign. The multiorgan human autoimmune disease, autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED/autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1) is an example of what happens in the body when central immune tolerance goes astray. APECED revealed the existence and function of the autoimmune regulator gene, which has a central role in the development of tolerance. The discovery of autoimmune regulator was the start of a new period in immunology and in understanding the role of central and peripheral tolerance, also very relevant to many skin diseases as we highlight in this review.

Mechanisms of skin autoimmunity: Cellular and soluble immune components of the skin

Autoimmune diseases are driven by either T cells or antibodies reacting specifically to 1 or more self-antigens. Although a number of self-antigens associated with skin diseases have been identified, the causative antigen(s) remains unknown in the great majority of skin diseases suspected to be autoimmune driven. Model diseases such as pemphigus, dermatitis herpetiformis, and more recently psoriasis have added greatly to our understanding of skin autoimmunity. Depending on the dominant T- or B-cell phenotype, skin autoimmune diseases usually follow 1 of 6 immune response patterns: lichenoid, eczematous, bullous, psoriatic, fibrogenic, or granulomatous. Usually, skin autoimmunity develops as a consequence of several events-an altered microbiome, inherited dysfunctional immunity, antigens activating innate immunity, epigenetic modifications, sex predisposition, and impact of antigens either as neoantigen or through molecular mimicry. This review summarizes currently known antigens of skin autoimmune diseases and discusses mechanisms of skin autoimmunity.

Pemphigus Vulgaris and Bullous Pemphigoid: Update on Diagnosis and Treatment

Autoimmune bullous disorders are a heterogeneous spectrum of skin disorders characterized by the production of autoantibodies against adhesion molecules of the skin. The 2 major groups of diseases are "pemphigus diseases" and "autoimmune bullous diseases of the pemphigoid type." Pemphigus diseases are a group of autoimmune blistering diseases of the skin and mucous membranes characterized by intraepithelial cleft and acantholysis. The main subtypes of pemphigus include pemphigus vulgaris, pemphigus foliaceus, and paraneoplastic pemphigus. Diagnosis is based on clinical manifestations and confirmed with histological, immunofluorescence, and serological testing. Recently multivariant enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay systems have been developed as practical screening tools for patients with suspected autoimmune bullous dermatoses. The current first-line treatment of pemphigus is based on systemic corticosteroids that are often combined with immunosuppressive adjuvants, such as azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab, usually at initiation of treatment. Rituximab efficacy is higher when it is administered early in the course of the disease. Therefore, it should be used as first-line treatment to improve efficacy and reduce cumulative doses of corticosteroids and their side effects. Treatment of bullous pemphigoid is based on disease extension. Localized and mild forms can be treated with superpotent topical corticosteroids or with nonimmunosuppressive agents. In patients with generalized disease or whose disease is resistant to the treatments described above, systemic corticosteroids are preferred and effective. Adjuvant immunosuppressants are often combined with steroids for their steroid-sparing effect.