Improving first-pass success rates during emergency intubation at an academic emergency department: a quality improvement initiative

Transitions in Video Laryngoscope Technology to Improve First-Pass Success

Prehospital intubation is a high-risk, relatively low frequency procedure. Provider experience plays a key role in first-pass success rates, especially in the setting of a difficult airway. While strong foundational knowledge is necessary to equip providers with an adequate understanding of intubation procedures and the skill set needed to manage a difficult airway, effective equipment may provide an extra boost in first-pass success for novice airway providers. First-pass success is correlated with decreased adverse events and should be maximized in the prehospital setting. After evaluating overall first-pass success of 66% to 83% from 2016 to 2020, AHN LifeFlight enacted changes in education, training, and video laryngoscopy equipment to successfully increase first-pass success to over 90%.

Predictive Factors for First-Pass Intubation Failure in Trauma Patients

Objective

The primary objective of this study was to elucidate risk factors for multiple intubation attempts (MIA) in trauma patients requiring emergent tracheal intubation (ETI). Risk factors for mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and prolonged ventilation were assessed as secondary outcomes. The association between multiple intubation attempts and adverse outcomes has been well described in the literature. Though previous studies have identified anatomical risk factors for difficult airways, no study to date has investigated predictors for MIA in a trauma setting.

Methods

The retrospective study involved 174 adult patients who required ETI and who presented to a Level 1 Trauma Center's emergency department between January 2019 and December 2022. Comorbidities, demographic information, triage vitals, intubation characteristics, and patient outcomes were identified to ascertain predictive risk factors for MIA. Variables were assessed for statistical significance on unadjusted analysis. Significant variables were entered into multivariate logistic regression models to test for adjusted associations, with p≤.0.05 as statistically significant, and presented as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Twenty-six (14.9%) of the 174 patients required multiple intubation attempts. There were no significant associations between MIA and patient gender, age, BMI, race, injury mechanism, or specific body region injuries. On univariate analysis, the MIA group had a statistically significant elevation in mean systolic blood pressure (151.71 ± 45.96 vs 133.55 ± 32.11, p = 0.019) and heart rate (106.30 ± 34.92 vs 93.35 ± 24.82, p < 0.032) compared to subjects with first-pass success. Elevation in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (151.71 ± 45.96 vs 133.55 ± 32.11, aOR 1.03 (1.01-1.06), p < 0.015) was an independent predictor of multiple intubation attempts.

Conclusion

Elevation in SBP was a significant predictor of multiple intubation attempts. Critical appraisal of patients requiring ETI with elevated SBP may mitigate risk in trauma settings.

Airway registries in primarily adult, emergent endotracheal intubation: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Emergency Department (ED) airway registries are formalized methods to collect and document airway practices and outcomes. Airway registries have become increasingly common in EDs globally; yet there is no consensus of airway registry methodology or intended utility. This review builds on previous literature and aims to provide a thorough description of international ED airway registries and discuss how airway registry data is utilized.

METHODS

A search of Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Libraries, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was performed with no date limitations applied. English language full-text publications and grey literature from centres implementing an ongoing airway registry to monitor intubations performed in mainly adult patients in an ED setting were included. Non-English publications and publications describing airway registries to monitor intubation practices in predominantly paediatric patients or settings outside of the ED were excluded. Study screening for eligibility was performed by two team members individually, with any disagreements resolved by a third team member. Data was charted using a standardized data charting tool created for this review.

RESULTS

Our review identified 124 eligible studies from 22 airway registries with a global distribution. We found that airway registry data is used for quality assurance, quality improvement, and clinical research regarding intubation practices and contextual factors. This review also demonstrates that there is a great deal of heterogeneity in definitions of first-pass success and adverse events in the peri-intubation period.

CONCLUSIONS

Airway registries are used as a crucial tool to monitor and improve intubation performance and patient care. ED airway registries inform and document the efficacy of quality improvement initiatives to improve intubation performance in EDs globally. Standardized definitions of first-pass success and peri-intubation adverse events, such as hypotension and hypoxia, may allow for airway management performance to be compared on a more equivalent basis and allow for the development of more reliable international benchmarks for first-pass success and rates of adverse events in the future.