A flowchart for building evidence-based care bundles in intensive care: based on a systematic review

Identifying the Bundle/Care Development Process in Clinical Risk Management: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

A bundle is a set of three to five evidence-based interventions designed to improve the quality and outcomes of care processes. Numerous international studies have evaluated the effectiveness of Bundles/Care Bundles (BCB) in reducing morbidity and mortality. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) has defined the concept of a bundle but has not outlined the development process.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the BCB development process in clinical risk scenarios from September 2005 to September 2023.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to identify studies describing the BCB development process in managing clinical risk situations. The databases consulted included PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL, along with manual searches on institutional websites. Relevant studies concerning the BCB development process were included.

RESULTS

A total of 1372 studies were retrieved, of which 16 were included. Duplicates were removed, and titles and abstracts were analyzed. The identified methods for BCB development include IHI guidelines, expert opinions, international guidelines, and flowcharts. The most common BCBs relate to the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia, surgical site infections, catheter-associated infections, and sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has identified the development processes of Care Bundles (BCBs) in clinical risk scenarios, highlighting how these tools facilitate compliance monitoring among members of the healthcare team. The review has revealed effective methods for designing evidence-based BCBs. However, the scarcity of studies on the methodology for developing BCBs is a limitation, suggesting the need for further research. In Italy, there is a growing interest in the use of care packages. It is essential to encourage research that optimizes the effectiveness of intervention strategies.

Development of an Evidence-based Care Bundle for Prevention of External Ventricular Drain-related Infection: Results of a Single-center Prospective Cohort Study and Literature Review

Background

External ventricular drain (EVD)-related infection (ERI) is a common complication in cranial neurosurgery practice with high mortality. The risk factors associated with ERI are not well studied in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) like India. Identifying the risk variables is a necessity to design robust evidence-based care bundles for ERI prevention.

Materials and methods

This is a single-center prospective cohort study. Patients with and without ERI during the 2-year study period were analyzed along with literature review to identify the risk variables associated with ERI. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) comprehensive flowchart was used to develop the concept care bundle for ERI prevention.

Results

A total of 211 EVD were inserted during the study period. 15 ERI (7.1%) were identified based on IDSA criteria, with an average infection rate of 11.12 per 1000 EVD days. Gram negative bacteria (GNB) were the predominant pathogen (12/15, 80%), with Klebsiella pneumoniae (6/15, 40%) being the most common bacteria isolated. In multivariate analysis, the risk variables associated with ERI were use of broad spectrum pre-surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis for long duration, choice of posterior craniometric points for EVD insertion, EVD duration >7 days, EVD leak and surveillance cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling at periodic intervals. Based on the risk variables identified in this study and literature review, a consensus decision on the care elements for the insertion and maintenance phases was chosen for the concept care bundle for ERI prevention.

Conclusion

An evidence-based concept care bundle for ERI prevention is proposed for further multicentric evaluation and validation.

How to cite this article

Ponnambath DK, Divakar G, Mamachan J, Biju S, Raja K, Abraham M. Development of an Evidence-based Care Bundle for Prevention of External Ventricular Drain-related Infection: Results of a Single-center Prospective Cohort Study and Literature Review. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(8):760-768.

Defining quality indicators, pharmaceutical care bundles and outcomes of clinical pharmacy service delivery using a Delphi consensus approach

BACKGROUND

Clinical pharmacy quality indicators are often non-uniform and measure individual activities not linked to outcomes.

AIM

To define a consensus agreed pharmaceutical care bundle and patient outcome measures across an entire state health service.

METHOD

A four-round modified-Delphi approach with state Directors of Pharmacy was performed (n = 25). They were asked to rate on a 5-point Likert scale the relevance and measurability of 32 inpatient clinical pharmacy quality indicators and outcome measures. They also ranked clinical pharmacy activities in order from perceived most to least beneficial. Based upon these results, pharmaceutical care bundles consisting of multiple clinical pharmacy activities were formed, and relevance and measurability assessed.

RESULTS

Response rate ranged from 40 to 60%. Twenty-six individual clinical pharmacy quality indicators reached consensus. The top ranked clinical pharmacy quality indicator was 'proportion of patients where a pharmacist documents an accurate list of medicines during admission'. There were nine pharmaceutical care bundles formed consisting between 3 and 7 activities. Only one pharmaceutical care bundle reached consensus: medication history, adverse drug reaction/allergy documentation, admission and discharge medication reconciliation, medication review, provision of medicines education and provision of a medication list on discharge. Sixteen outcome measures reached consensus. The top ranked were hospital acquired complications, readmission due to medication misadventure and unplanned readmission within 10 days.

CONCLUSION

Consensus has been reached on one pharmaceutical care bundle and sixteen outcomes to monitor clinical pharmacy service delivery. The next step is to measure the extent of pharmaceutical care bundle delivery and the link to patient outcomes.

Effects of cluster nursing interventions on the prevention of pressure ulcers in intensive care units patients: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the impact of cluster nursing interventions on the prevention of pressure ulcers (PUs) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Computer searches were performed in databases including Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) implementing cluster nursing interventions for PUs prevention in ICU patients, with the search period covering the database inception to November 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and conducted quality assessments. Stata 17.0 software was employed for data analysis. Overall, 17 RCTs involving 1463 ICU patients were included. The analysis showed that compared with conventional nursing, cluster nursing interventions significantly reduced the incidence of PUs (odds ratio: 0.24, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.17-0.34, p < 0.001) and also significantly improved the levels of anxiety (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -1.39, 95% CI: -1.57 to 1.22, p < 0.001) and depression (SMD: -1.64, 95% CI: -2.02 to 1.26, p < 0.001) in ICU patients. This study indicates that the application of cluster nursing interventions in ICU patients can effectively reduce the incidence of PUs, as well as improve patients' anxiety and depression levels, thereby enhancing their quality of life, which is worth clinical promotion and application.

The Perioperative Pain Management Bundle is Feasible: Findings From the PAIN OUT Registry

OBJECTIVES

The quality of postoperative pain management is often poor. A "bundle," a small set of evidence-based interventions, is associated with improved outcomes in different settings. We assessed whether staff caring for surgical patients could implement a "Perioperative Pain Management Bundle" and whether this would be associated with improved multidimensional pain-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

METHODS

"PAIN OUT," a perioperative pain registry, offers tools for auditing pain-related PROs and obtaining information about perioperative pain management during the first 24 hours after surgery. Staff from 10 hospitals in Serbia used this methodology to collect data at baseline. They then implemented the "Perioperative Pain Management Bundle" into the clinical routine and collected another round of data. The bundle consists of 4 treatment elements: (1) a full daily dose of 1 to 2 nonopioid analgesics (eg, paracetamol and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), (2) at least 1 type of local/regional anesthesia, (3) pain assessment by staff, and (4) offering patients information about pain management. The primary endpoint was a multidimensional pain composite score (PCS), evaluating pain intensity, interference, and side effects that was compared between patients who received the full bundle versus not.

RESULTS

Implementation of the complete bundle was associated with a significant reduction in the PCS ( P < 0.001, small-medium effect size [ES]). When each treatment element was evaluated independently, nonopioid analgesics were associated with a higher PCS (ie, poorer outcome, and negligible ES), and the other elements were associated with a lower PCS (all negligible small ES). Individual PROs were consistently better in patients receiving the full bundle compared with 0 to 3 elements. The PCS was not associated with the surgical discipline.

DISCUSSION

We report findings from using a bundle approach for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing mixed surgical procedures. Future work will seek strategies to improve the effect.

Feasibility and impact of a postpartum hemorrhage emergency care package using a bundle approach in Migori County, Kenya

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of the PPH Emergency Care package (PPH EmC)-a holistic intervention that uses a bundle approach that has been implemented in Kenya, India, Nepal, Bangladesh, and Central America-in a low-resource setting.

METHODS

The feasibility and impact of PPH EmC implementation in Migori County, Kenya was studied using a qualitative research design. In March and April 2022 key informants were identified using purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted over Zoom from March to May 2022 until thematic saturation was reached. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for emerging themes.

RESULTS

PPH EmC has positively impacted facility and health system preparedness, referral coordination, teamwork and communication, and overall capacity to provide quality PPH emergency care. Participants reported that PPH EmC is sustainable because of its low cost and support from local partners.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of PPH EmC in Migori County, Kenya was feasible and positively impacted PPH emergency care.

Care bundles to reduce unplanned extubation in critically ill children: a systematic review, critical appraisal and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the current evidence for the efficacy of care bundles in reducing unplanned extubations (UEs) in critically ill children.

DESIGN

Systematic review according to the Cochrane guidelines and meta-analysis using random-effects modelling.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane and SciELO databases from inception until April 2021. We conducted a quality appraisal for each study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) V.2.0 checklist.

MAIN OUTCOME

The primary outcome measure was UE rates per 100 intubation days.

RESULTS

We screened 10 091 records and finally included 11 studies. Six studies were pre/post-intervention studies, and five were interrupted time-series studies. The methodological quality was 'good' in 70%, and the remaining as 'fair' (30%). The most frequently used implementation strategies were staff education (100%), root cause analysis (100%), and audit and feedback (82%). Key bundle care components comprised identification of high-risk patients, endotracheal tube care and sedation protocol. Not all studies fully completed the SQUIRE V.2.0 checklist. Meta-analysis revealed a reduction in UE rate following the introduction of care bundles (rate ratio: 0.40 (95% CI: 0.19 to 0.84); p=0.02), which equates to a 60% reduction in UE rates.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that identifying high-risk patients, endotracheal tube care and protocol-directed sedation are core elements in care bundles for preventing UEs. However, there are several methodological gaps in the literature, including poor evaluation of adherence to bundle components. Future studies should address these gaps to strengthen their validity.

A nurse practitioner-led care bundle approach for primary care of patients with complex health needs

BACKGROUND

Often developed for acute care and less frequently for primary care, care bundles are clusters of evidence-based practices for improving care delivery and patient outcomes. Care bundles usually arise when ineffective or costly outcomes are identified, are meant to make care more reliable, and require superb teamwork and communication.

LOCAL PROBLEM

Patients using the highest proportion of health care services are those living with complex health conditions and challenging sociocultural lives, statistics corroborated within our primary care clinic. In our nurse practitioner (NP)-led, interprofessional, team-based primary care program serving mainly low-income patients, we noted that many patients with multiple chronic conditions had an excess of clinic encounters, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations.

METHODS

To improve health status for these patients and reduce costly care inefficiencies, we developed a unique bundle of care practices for embedding within our NP-led complex care program. Our goals were to improve patient efficacy for self-management of chronic conditions and promote appropriate use of health care resources and services.

INTERVENTIONS

Using AEIØOU as a mnemonic, the derived care bundle better focused our team efforts and provided us with a planning, communication, and documentation schema for quality improvement. It was particularly useful for team-based care because tasks could be documented or communicated by letter or number and easily reviewed by team members or others involved in patients' care.

RESULTS

Use of the AEIØOU bundle within our program resulted in better coordination of team-based comprehensive care for our high-needs patients, seen anecdotally in fewer unnecessary contacts and missed appointments and in patient appreciation comments. Emergency department visits and hospitalization data for the six months before compared with 6 months after enrollment in the program showed significant reductions.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve the primary care of complex patient populations, we recommend further use and testing of the AEIØOU bundle within other care models.

Bundle for the prevention and management of complications of neutropenia in cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

to construct and assess bundle content for the prevention and management of complications in neutropenia in cancer patients.

METHODS

a methodological study developed in four stages: scoping review; bundle construction; material assessment by experts (developed according to Pasquali's psychometry); pilot test in a High Complexity Assistance Unit in Oncology. For content assessment, the Delphi technique was applied in two rounds and those items with Content Validation Coefficient (CVC)> 0.78 and agreement> 80.0% were considered valid. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

RESULTS

all bundle requirements reached agreement between judges above 80.0%, in addition to statistically significant levels of assessment. At the end of the Delphi technique, bundle was significantly valid with CVC = 0.92 and CVC = 0.93, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

bundle content proved to be valid and highly credible.

Using a comprehensive audit to identify local context prior to care bundle design and implementation for inadvertent perioperative hypothermia in colorectal surgery

Background

The first step in bundle design or implementation is to identify the problem being addressed. Several validated approaches are recommended to facilitate this. These include using systematic reviews, adverse event triggers and risk assessment tools. However, these methods do not fully take the local context into account, which will limit the effectiveness of the bundle.

Aim

This study explores the potential benefit of using a comprehensive audit to identify an organisation’s local context prior to designing and implementing a care bundle.

Method

A comprehensive audit comprising observations of four patient journeys, interviews with 21 staff and clinical data was carried out at one large National Health Service trust in England. A patient warming care bundle was used as the exemplar.

Findings

Each of the three data collection methods identified specific local practices which would be addressed within the planning and implementation stages of a care bundle. These practices would not have been identified through other recommended methods.

Conclusion

A comprehensive audit, comprising observations, interviews and clinical data is a successful method to identify local contextual issues prior to care bundle implementation.

Impact of strategic planning, organizational culture imprint and care bundles to reduce adverse events in the ICU

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the occurrence of adverse events during a multifaceted program implementation.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional secondary analysis.

SETTING

The respiratory-ICU of a large tertiary care center.

PARTICIPANTS

Retrospectively collected data of patients admitted from 1 March 2010 to 28 February 2014 (usual care period) and from 1 March 2014 to 1 March 2017 (multifaceted program period) were used.

INTERVENTIONS

The program integrated three components: (1) strategic planning and organizational culture imprint; (2) training and practice and (3) implementation of care bundles. Strategic planning redefined the respiratory-ICU Mission and Vision, its SWOT matrix (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) as well as its medium to long-term aims and planned actions. A 'Wear the Institution's T-shirt' monthly conference was given in order to foster organizational culture in healthcare personnel. Training was conducted on hand hygiene and projects 'Pneumonia Zero' and 'Bacteremia Zero'. Finally, actions of both projects were implemented.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rates of adverse events (episodes per 1000 patient/days).

RESULTS

Out of 1662 patients (usual care, n = 981; multifaceted program, n = 681) there was a statistically significant reduction during the multifaceted program in episodes of accidental extubation ([Rate ratio, 95% CI] 0.31, 0.17-0.55), pneumothorax (0.48, 0.26-0.87), change of endotracheal tube (0.17, 0.07-0.44), atelectasis (0.37, 0.20-0.68) and death in the ICU (0.82, 0.69-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

A multifaceted program including strategic planning, organizational culture imprint and care protocols was associated with a significant reduction of adverse events in the respiratory-ICU.

Improving outcome of sepsis on the ward: introducing the 'Sepsis Six' bundle

BACKGROUND

The Sepsis Six bundle is designed to facilitate early intervention with three diagnostic and three therapeutic steps to be delivered within 1 h to patients with suspected sepsis.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of delivering the 'Sepsis Six' bundle by the Critical Care Outreach team on patient outcomes.

DESIGN

In a prospective observational study, all adult patients on the general wards from June 2012 to January 2014 with sepsis who were screened and treated by the Critical Care Outreach team were included.

METHODS

The main outcome measure was the change in National Early Warning Score following the delivery of the Sepsis Six bundle within 24 h. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mortality and overall bundle compliance.

RESULTS

A total of 207 patients were included in the analysis. Overall bundle compliance was 84%. National Early Warning Scores decreased significantly 24 h after administering the Sepsis Six, from 7·4 ± 2·6 to 3·1 ± 2·4 (p < 0·001). The distribution of the National Early Warning Score changed significantly. Mortality was lower at 90 days when patients who presented with signs of sepsis within 48 h of hospital admission were compared with those who presented with signs of sepsis after 48 h of hospital admission (14·5% versus 35·4% p < 0·03) despite similar baseline physiological variables.

CONCLUSIONS

We found better outcomes after the administration of Sepsis Six. Reliable delivery of the bundle, defined as 80% of patients receiving the standard of care, is achievable, and our quality improvement data suggest that it is likely to be sustainable in our environment.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Sepsis Six can reduce physiological impairment, monitored by the National Early Warning Scores. Consistent delivery of the bundle can lead to better patient outcomes.