Validation of an Inhaled Therapy Beliefs Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Background: To carry out a validation questionnaire that assesses beliefs about inhaled treatments in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), as knowing patients' beliefs could help to improve medication adherence and health outcomes. Methods: We evaluated data from 260 COPD patients from electronic medical record databases from five primary healthcare centers, in a descriptive, cross-sectional study with a sample size calculated for a 10-item questionnaire, with an estimated Cronbach's alpha of 0.70 and a 95% confidence level. Study participants were selected via systematic random sampling. Variables: Ten-item Inhaled Therapy Beliefs Questionnaire, CCTI-Questionnaire v.2.0, time for completion, age, sex, educational level, spirometry severity (GOLD criteria), exacerbations (previous year), characteristics of inhaled treatment, and smoking habit. A two-year follow-up in a subsample of 77 patients from one health center was utilized. The Morisky-Green test, pharmacy dispensing data, test-retest (kappa coefficient), and an exploratory analysis of the adherence-belief relationship (ji-squared) were measured. Results: The 10-item questionnaire showed good viability (3 min completion time) when performed face-to-face or telephonically; its psychometric properties were acceptable, with an internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) score of 0.613. Three factors explained 47.58% of the total variance (p < 0.0001): use (factor 1), effects (factor 2), and objectives (factor 3) of inhalers. The two-year follow-up ultimately considered 58 out of the 77 patients (10 deceased, 4 unlocated, 2 mistakes, 2 no inhaled treatment, and 1 withdrawal). Non-adherence was 48.3% in terms of the Morisky-Green test; 31% in terms of pharmacy dispensing data; and 40.4% considering both methods. There was low test-retest reliability, indicated by items 4, 8, and 9 of the CCTI-Questionnaire (Kappa = 0.4, 0.26, and 0.34; p-value < 0.0001, 0.008, and 0.001, respectively). There was mild correlation between beliefs and adherence. Conclusions: The ten-item CCTI-Questionnaire v.2.0 demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties regarding feasibility, reliability, and content validity.

Exploring Effective Communication Strategies Employed by Physicians in Delivering Bad News in Ethiopian State Hospitals

Introduction

Delivering Bad News (DBN) presents a highly challenging situation in physician-patient communication. This study aims to gain insight into the various communication strategies employed by physicians when DBN.

Methods

This qualitative study conducted thematic analysis of in-depth interviews. Physicians from two comprehensive hospitals with large patient populations were selected purposively based on their engagement in delivering bad news to patients. Thematic analysis was made.

Results

Thematic analysis of the data revealed several communication strategies physicians use when delivering bad news. These communication strategies include. Jointly Initiated Physician-Patient Communication Strategies: ((i) Discussing with patient family/caregivers, (ii) Collaborating with other physicians and specialists), Patient-Engaged/Led Communication Strategies: ((iii) Investigating with adolescents alone or without the family, (iv) Helping patients predict what the news is, (v) Identifying patients' emotions related to bad news, (vi) Assessing patients' level of understanding, (vii) Minimizing patient anxiety), Physician-Related Communication Strategies: ((viii) Making sure diagnostic results are accurate, (xi) Identifying causes for rejection, (x) deliveringbad news using clear and simple communication).

Conclusion

Delivering bad news to patients can be challenging for physicians. It is important to be clear and accurate, and to prepare patients for the news. Patients may feel more comfortable and open when they are unaccompanied and with their healthcare provider. The study concluded that physicians need to be prepared to deliver bad news in a sensitive and effective manner.

Mapping Evidence of Patients' Experiences in Integrated Care: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

Despite the established clinical and cost-effectiveness of integrated care (IC) models for patients with comorbid mental and physical illness, little is known about whether these models facilitate a better care experience from the patient's perspective. The authors conducted a scoping review of the literature to explore how IC influences patients' care experiences.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, PSYC INFO CINAHL, AMED, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature were searched to identify relevant articles. Eligible studies were systematically reviewed and analyzed, using thematic analysis approach, to identify patterns, trends, and variation in patient experience within IC settings.

RESULTS

Search results yielded 5250 unique resources of which 21 primary studies met our eligibility criteria for analysis. Findings from this scoping review revealed variation in patients' experiences in IC settings. IC models enhanced patients' experience by creating theraputic spaces: improving patient access to care, developing collaborative relationships, and personalizing patient care to address individual needs.

CONCLUSION

Productive interactions with care team were key to improve patient engagement and experience of centeredness in IC settings. Successful implementation of IC demanded purposeful alignment of IC structural components and care processes to create therapeutic spaces that address patient care needs and preferences.